Blakely Island, N Thatcher Bay. Restoration Recommendation: Rank Score (total score)

Similar documents
Estuarine Shoreline Stabilization

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

VIMS CCRM Coastal Management Decision Tools. Decision Tree for Undefended Shorelines and Those with Failed Structures

Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project Restore America s Estuaries Conference 2012 Tampa, FL

Habitat Development: Habitat Boulders Lawson Pier Foreshore Enhancement

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION

SHOREHAM BEACH LOCAL NATURE RESERVE

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

Stevens Creek Corridor

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

Coastal Change and Conflict

DUNE STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION

San Juan County Shoreline Modification Inventory Restoration Opportunities Report

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Conservation and Restoration Florida s Coastal Marshes: An Overview of MESS. Jeff Beal, Kent Smith, Erin McDevitt, Maria Merrill

Protecting our Beaches

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

COASTAL MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION METHODS! 1

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

Shoreline Studies Program, Department of Physical Sciences, VIMS

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

AIRPORT RD. EROSION HOMEOWNER FOCUS GROUP SUMMARY 1/1/ PM NATURE COAST BIOLOGICAL STATION

Design Considerations for Living Shorelines in Connecticut. Jennifer E.D. O Donnell Department of Marine Sciences University of Connecticut

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

The Malaspina Okeover

APPENDIX A Shoreline Walk & History

For more information or permission to reprint slides, please contact Donna Milligan at 1

CHAPTER 4 - SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDY AND PLAN

Chesil Beach, Dorset UK High energy, shingle coastline. Brighton Beach, Sussex UK Pebble beach

Overview. Beach Features. Coastal Regions. Other Beach Profile Features. CHAPTER 10 The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes.

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

An Update of Coastal Erosion in Puerto Rico

Oceans and Coasts. Chapter 18

Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida

Soft Designs for a Harsh Climate: Trends in Coastal Engineering

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

SHORE EROSION CONTROL GUIDELINES

Briefing Book - Glossary. Accretion due to stream sediment added naturally to the shore Puget Sound, Everett

Steelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

BALD HEAD ISLAND, NC SAND SHARING SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT. Erik J. Olsen, P.E. olsen associates, inc.

PROJECT TO INSTALL LARGE WOOD HABITAT STRUCTURES IN THE CARMEL RIVER USING CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME GRANT FUNDS

County of Santa Barbara Permit Option Analysis Goleta Beach JULY 13, 2017

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

ST. JOSEPH PENINSULA, GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA Beach Re-Nourishment and Environmental Enhancement Project RECOMMENDATIONS

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

Puget Sound Shorelines. Waves and coastal processes. Puget Sound shorelines: Effects of beach armoring

Fish Community. Fish Habitat, Streams and Rivers

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

Absecon Island Shore Protection The planning behind the project

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

Shoreline Modification Inventory for San Juan County, Washington

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

Cross-Vane Plan View FIN-UP Habitat Consultants, Inc. 220 Illinois Avenue Manitou Springs, CO (719) P.

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

23- Year Sand Volume Changes at Site 132, 15th Street, Brigantine

RLRC COMMUNITIES EAST GRAND FORKS AREA CHARACTER THE RED LAKE RIVER & THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH CONFLUENCE EAGLE POINT BOAT LAUNCH DESIGN

TO: FROM: Y.102/MIN

GEO/PLAN ASSOCIATES 30 MANN STREET HINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS Voice & Fax: (781)

TITLE: COASTAL EROSION AND LANDFORMS.

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

North Shore of Long Island, Feasibility Study

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Fairfax County Shoreline Management Plan

There are many different kinds of beaches which are generally characterized by the dominance of waves, tides, rivers and currents, and in particular

Understanding Types and Benefits of Fish Habitat

4/20/17. #32 - Coastal Erosion Case Histories - Lake Michigan

* Appalachian Mountains -the mountain range in the Eastern U.S. which terminates in north-central Alabama

Creation of Fish and Wildlife Habitat on the Closed Salmon Harbour Mine in Minto, NB

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY WETLANDS BOARD Minutes May 15, 2013

COASTAL SYSTEMS WAVE ENERGY

Waikanae River Environmental Strategy. 12. Arapawaiti/Otaihanga Reach

Earth Science Chapter 16 Section 3 Review

Figure 262. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 279

Feasibility Study for Restoration of Titlow Lagoon Fish Passage. South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group

The Dynamic Coast. Right Place Resources. A presentation about the interaction between the dynamic coast and people

Shorelines Earth - Chapter 20 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the major environments on Mustang Island.

PRACTICE STANDARDS AND NR 328. Choosing a Technique and Getting a Permit

Affects of Tides on Lateral Coastal Access at. Las Varas Ranch. Gaviota, California. Photos Courtesy of California Coastal Records Project

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

Shoreline Erosion Control Failures and How To Avoid Them

Design and Construction of Living

WHAT ARE ECOSYSTEMS? Dr. V. N. Nayak Professor of Marine Biology (Retd)

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Constructive waves build beaches. Each wave is low. As the wave breaks it carries material up the beach in its. material will then be deposited as

2014 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

Coastal Hazards and Management in North Carolina. Braxton Davis April 14, 2015

Inspection of Clarence City Beaches following Winter 2011 Storm Events

Name: Form: 2.To know the difference between Constructive and Destructive wave # $

Marine Ecosystems. Aquatic Ecosystems Section 2

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Combating Erosion at Mosquito Point

Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Annual Report Fiscal Year 06: July 1, 2005 June 30, 2006

Transcription:

Soft Shore Protection/Structure Removal Blueprint for San Juan County Forage Fish Beaches Appendix 2: Recommendations for sites scoring below the top ten, sorted by island (east to west) Blakely Island, N Thatcher Bay Remove 20+ creosote piles and dolphins in Bay. Remove concrete debris, steel cables and boulders on beach adjacent to the ramp (that have fallen from damaged rock revetment). na Beach restoration feasibility score: na Habitat enhancement value na Lopez Island Aleck Bay-north Redesign/reconfigure current beach access. Remove (threatened) cement wall and rockery protecting access. Cut notch into bank for new simple stairway to limited quantity of retained rock (keyed 2+ ft below grade) at base only. Install protective cobble-pebble berm along upper-most beach surrounding beach access. Anchored driftwood should also be used to deflect direct wave energy around beach access. Riparian vegetation should be planted atop the bluff, which will help to slow erosion rates along this community owned shore. 5.2 (33) Beach restoration feasibility score: 4.8 Habitat enhancement value 5.6

Lopez Island East Shoal Bay-spit Remove cement platform, and relict solider pile bulkhead (especially creosoted wood). Import small quantity gravel and sand for berm along upper-most beach, plant dune vegetation to help absorb wave energy and recreate lost habitat. 5.6 (35) Beach restoration feasibility score: 6.8 Habitat enhancement value 4.4 Lopez Island East Shoal Bay - east Remove bulkheads and overwater structure over time. If shore protection is truly required, avoid creosoted wood and have structures against bank toe. 4.9 (31) Beach restoration feasibility score: 4.5 Habitat enhancement value 5.3 2

Lopez Island East Shoal Bay-central Plant additional riparian vegetation along bank on ends, and maintain central vegetation (the modified is located above MHHW.) 4.8 (30) Beach restoration feasibility score: 4.5 Habitat enhancement value 5.0 Lopez Island East Shoal Bay-west Remove home-made erosion control structures that do not substantially slow bank erosion, but make habitat unavailable. Use alternative erosion control techniques including possibly narrow protective berm along upper-most beach with composite structures (e.g. anchored driftwood), plant dune vegetation to help absorb wave energy and recreate lost habitat. 5.4 (34) Beach restoration feasibility score: 5.8 Habitat enhancement value 5.0 3

Lopez Island, Agate Bay Decommission road that runs adjacent to beach and relocate road or use alternate road that runs landward of homes. Remove riprap from bank and beach install soft shore protection design. A large volume of material should be distributed across the upper beach with composite structures designed to provide additional protection to the toe of the bank during high water storm events. Requires further work. na Beach restoration feasibility score: na Habitat enhancement value na Orcas Island, Buck Bay (total score) Remove rockery and broken concrete from beach. Relocate road landward to avoid beach narrowing. Nourish upper beach with mix of sediment defined by sampling adjacent unmodified reference beach. Install protective berm with composite materials (including driftwood/root wads), to help absorb wave energy. Plant native vegetation (shrubs and conifers) along bank to enhance bank stability and overhanging marine riparian vegetation. 2.7 (16) Beach restoration feasibility score: 2.6 Habitat enhancement value 2.8 4

Orcas Island, Olga residences Remove creosote piles from intertidal habitat, eradicate invasive species and remove steel debris and boulders from the intertidal. na Beach restoration feasibility score: na Habitat enhancement value na Orcas Island, White Beach Remove (dock-related) heavily-creosoted structure from backshore as it is toxic to fish and other species. na Beach restoration feasibility score: na Habitat enhancement value na 5

Orcas Island, Ferry landing (total score) Move shore protection landward as it is repaired/replaced and remove if road in no longer needed. Eradicate invasive species on bluff including Cytisus scoparius and Rubus Discolor. 2.7 (16) Beach restoration feasibility score: 2.6 Habitat enhancement value 2.8 Orcas Island, West Sound, on leeward side of Double Island Remove rockery along lot located between 2 homes, nourish upper beach profile and create higher berm with driftwood and dune vegetation in place of rock. na Beach restoration feasibility score: na Habitat enhancement value na 6

Orcas Island North Pole Pass northern property Remove rockery and nourish the upper beach with mix of sediment defined by sampling adjacent unmodified (reference) beach. Beach nourishment design could include the installation of berm with driftwood/root wads, to help absorb wave energy. Plant native vegetation (shrubs and conifers) along bank to enhance bank stability, prevent erosion exacerbated by run-off and enhance overhanging marine riparian buffer. 3.3 (21) Beach restoration feasibility score: 5.5 Habitat enhancement value 1.3 Orcas Island North Pole Pass Cove and North Pole Pass (all restoration opportunities are on single residential property) Remove toppling rockery, as it provides minimal function as erosion control and merely precludes access to intertidal habitat. Eradicate invasive species, and cease dumping yard waste onto the beach. Plant riparian buffer in backshore and bluff slope to reduce erosion rates and enhance habitat. Beach nourishment optional near/around structures (low erosion rate would nt threaten large uplands). Very good habitat potential. Site visit and consultation with Jim Johannessen recommended. 4.6 (29) Beach restoration feasibility score: 6.5 Habitat enhancement value 2.8 7

San Juan Island Turn Point marsh (eastern corner of Bay) Remove small intertidal rockery along marsh front. Rockery is not at all necessary along this accretionary beach. This will free upper beach habitat as well as enable natural berm, and possibly inlet channel to reform. This would add clear habitat benefits and could be termed true restoration. 5.1 (32) Beach restoration feasibility score: 7.4 Habitat enhancement value 2.8 San Juan Island Turn Pt east and central properties Remove rockeries and nourish upper beach profile with mix of sediment defined by sampling adjacent (east) unmodified reference beach. Install driftwood/root wads to help absorb wave energy (and ferry wake). Plant native vegetation (shrubs and conifers) along bank to enhance bank stability and overhanging marine riparian vegetation. 2.9-3.0 Beach restoration feasibility score: 5.2-5.5 Habitat enhancement value 0.6-0.9 (18-19) 8

San Juan Island Turn Pt western properties (including county-owned property) Remove unnecessary small rock wall. Nourish upper beach from MHHW to extreme high water (EHW), plant dune vegetation and some native shrubs. Place anchored drift logs in former location of rock to buffer wave attack during storms. Clear out culvert that flows out onto beach near county property s southern boundary. Best solution would be to remove culvert and daylight small creek around house and recreate mini-estuary at shore for habitat. 3.7-3.5 Beach restoration feasibility score: 5.5-6.1 Habitat enhancement value 0.9-1.9 (22-23) San Juan Island Friday Harbor South north and central properties Remove rockery, rock groin and non-native angular beach sediment that are inappropriate for beach habitat. Nourish upper beach profile with mix of sediment defined by sampling adjacent unmodified (reference) beach. Install protective berm with composite materials (including driftwood/root wads), to help absorb minor wave energy (and ferry wake). Plant native vegetation (shrubs and conifers) along bank to enhance bank stability and overhanging marine riparian vegetation. 3.7 (23) Beach restoration feasibility score: 5.2 Habitat enhancement value 2.2 9

San Juan Island Friday Harbor South central Remove degraded concrete bulkhead and restore natural bank. should be nourished with a mix sand and gravel to be determined by sampling nearby reference beach. Large logs should be integrated into the nourishment design to help dissipate wakes, as well as terminal groins to maintain beach sediment. Additional alternative erosion control methods could also be utilized to curb erosion (if necessary) including vegetation and storm water management. Native shrubs and trees should be planted restore marine riparian bluffer, which will also aid in reducing bank erosion. 3.7 (23) Beach restoration feasibility score: 5.2 Habitat enhancement value 2.2 San Juan Island, Friday Harbor South southern property Remove creosote bulkhead and restore natural bank. Beach should be nourished with a mix sand and gravel to be determined by sampling nearby reference beach. Large logs should be integrated into the nourishment design to help dissipate wakes. Drift logs should also be utilized as terminal groins to maintain beach sediment. Additional alternative erosion control methods could also be utilized to curb erosion (if necessary) including vegetation and storm water management. Native shrubs and trees should be planted to enhance marine riparian bluffer. 3.8 (24) Beach restoration feasibility score: 4.8 Habitat enhancement value 2.8 10

San Juan Island, Friday Harbor West- southern properties Restore natural bank by removing riprap and allowing natural beach profile to reform. Beach should be nourished with a mix sand and gravel to be determined by sampling nearby reference beach. Additional alternative erosion control methods should be considered to curb erosion (if necessary) including vegetation and needed storm water management. Native shrubs and trees should be planted to restore marine riparian bluffer. 4.1 (26) Beach restoration feasibility score: 6.5 Habitat enhancement value 1.9 San Juan Island Friday Harbor West central properties Remove rockery, solider pile and creosote bulkhead and other misc. materials below MHHW. Install limited beach nourishment with driftwood/root wads, to help absorb minor wave energy (and ferry wake). Plant native vegetation along bank to enhance bank stability and overhanging marine riparian vegetation. Some limited bank regarding may be required. 3.7 (23) Beach restoration feasibility score: 5.2 Habitat enhancement value 2.2 11

San Juan Island Friday Harbor West northern properties Remove rockery, solider pile and creosote bulkhead and other misc. materials below MHHW. Install limited beach nourishment with driftwood/root wads, to help absorb minor wave energy (and ferry wake). Plant native vegetation along bank to enhance bank stability and overhanging marine riparian vegetation. Some limited bank regrading may be required. 5.6 (35) Beach restoration feasibility score: 6.5 Habitat enhancement value 4.7 San Juan Island, False Bay Rd Remove the riprap and large boulder lag deposits both of which cover considerable upper intertidal area, including valuable habitat. Relocating the False Bay Road and nourishing the beach (and the aforementioned removal of rockery and lag deposits) will enhance habitats that are degraded under current conditions, as well as enabling beaches to naturally translate (migrate landward) under sea level rise scenarios. Relocating the road will also (likely) provide additional area for marine riparian restoration. Need s additional study for implications and details. 4.4 (26) Beach restoration feasibility score: 2.6-3.7 Habitat enhancement value 5.0-5.9 12

San Juan Island, Yacht Haven Remove boat ramp/paved intertidal and nourish beach (assuming it is not in use). Failing bulkhead in the southern portion of the beach should be relocated landward or removed. Relict concrete footings should also be removed. Remove infringing rockery from intertidal as it not only precludes access to upper beach substrate in forage fish spawning area, but is obstructing net shore-drift. na Beach restoration feasibility score: na Habitat enhancement value na 13

- Legend Unscored_opportunities Additional Opportunities Olga residents N Pole Pass & Pole Pass Cove ORCAS ISLAND Leeward of Double Island, Westsound Buck Bay White Beach Orcas Ferry Landing Yacht Haven Blind Bay SHAW ISLAND Shoal Bay SAN JUAN ISLAND Thatcher Bay, Blakely Island W. Friday Harbor S. Friday Harbor Turn Pt False Bay LOPEZ ISLAND Mud Bay Barlow Bay & MacKaye Harbor Rd Aleck Bay Agate Bay 0 0.35 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.8 Miles 1:100,000 Figure 30. opportunities found throughout San Juan County San Juan County Soft Shore Protection/Bulkhead Removal Blueprint