New town planning and imbalanced development: The case of Stevenage

Similar documents
Understanding the Pattern of Work Travel in India using the Census Data

REPORT OF THE ENGINEERING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION

Life Transitions and Travel Behaviour Study. Job changes and home moves disrupt established commuting patterns

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

European Golf Statistics 2017

Mobility and Congestion

Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) Picture of Lewisham 2018

Understanding the. Dr. Christopher Waller. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

What did the World Student Games do for Sheffield? The 1991 Games as the catalyst for the regeneration of Sheffield

WELCOME Region of Waterloo Transportation Master Plan Update Public Consultation Centre

Americans in Transit A Profile of Public Transit Passengers

Economic Transformation and Recovery in Hong Kong and Singapore

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Nebraska Births Report: A look at births, fertility rates, and natural change

Demographic and Economic Trends in the Tri-State Region

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Economics 134 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Spring 2018 Professor David Romer

Acknowledgements. Ms. Linda Banister Ms. Tracy With Mr. Hassan Shaheen Mr. Scott Johnston

The End of Hyper growth: Political and Economic Responses to a Slowing China

Participation. Workers Compensation Insurance Seminar. May 22, Nick Beleiciks

Clackmannanshire Council. Housing Need and Demand Assessment. 1.0 Introduction

Population & Demographics

45,

Lewisham Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment Appendix B - Lewisham The Place

TEST OF ENGLISH FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES

Demographic Change in North Carolina

Location Matters: Where America Is Moving

THE PHILIPPINE ECONOMY: Recent Performance and Long-Term Outlook. Undersecretary Rolando G. Tungpalan 17 February 2016

MANITOBA'S ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY: A 2001 TO 2026 POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Housing, Economics and People in the U.S. and Wisconsin

Zhang Shuguang. The Development of Community Sports Facilities in China: Effects of the Olympic Games

Telling Canada s story in numbers Elizabeth Richards Analytical Studies Branch April 20, 2017

The Quality of Life of the People in Norway

Fixed Guideway Transit Outcomes on Rents, Jobs, and People and Housing

THE I-79 CORRIDOR. I-79 provides motorists with connections to the following major highways: I-80, PA 358, PA 965 and PA 208.

GETTING WHERE WE WANT TO BE

SITUATIONS AND CHALLENGES OF ROAD SAFETY IN CHINA

Nebraska s Population and Economic Trends

Webinar: The Association Between Light Rail Transit, Streetcars and Bus Rapid Transit on Jobs, People and Rents

Housing Market Update Greater Moncton. Housing market intelligence you can count on

SPORTS PARTICIPATION CHANGES IN LONDON FOLLOWING LONDON 2012 WITH NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS

Active travel and economic performance: A What Works review of evidence from cycling and walking schemes

Cycling to work in London, 2011

I write in response to the current consultation. I am copying this to Derrick Ashley and I will be posting this online.

Michigan Population Trends: The School Age Population

FIVE GREAT STAGNATIONS

The Baltic economies: Current situation and future trends, possibilities and pitfalls

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

APPROVED OUTLAY AND EXPENDITURE ON ROAD TRANSPORT DURING XTH FIVE YEAR PLAN

Growth Trends in Hampton Roads

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

South Jersey certainly has many of quality of life issues related to transportation. In spite of being a small state, the Garden State has the 3 rd

9. Parking Supporting Statement

Public transport and town planning from a retroactive point of view C. Wallstrom, S. Johansson et al

Five Ways the 2016 Census Affects Marketers

Why a low unemployment rate doesn t mean everything is rosy in the labour market

Water Development Office

Wenlin Liu, Senior Economist. Stateof Wyoming. Economic Analysis Division State of Wyoming 1

The Long-term Perspective: IHS Scenarios to 2030 applied to Automotive. Presented by: Nigel Griffiths Chief Automotive Economist IHS Automotive

EFFECTS OF IMPORT AND INVENTORY AMOUNTS ON CHANGES IN WHOLESALE PRICES OF SALMON IN JAPAN

An Overview of the Canadian Labour Market

World supply and demand of tilapia

CAMBRIDGE ACCESS STUDY: TACKLING CONGESTION WORKSHOP

Football factsheet Football is the most popular team sport for women October 2012

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Social Convergence, Development Failures and Industrial Relations: The Case of Portugal

Delivering Accident Prevention at local level in the new public health system

TOUR DE FRANCE GRAND DÉPART YORKSHIRE

1.0 FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL...

Land Use and Cycling. Søren Underlien Jensen, Project Manager, Danish Road Directorate Niels Juels Gade 13, 1020 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Dr Neil J. Bristow. 8 th WSD Steel Success Strategies European Steel Conference London, 30 th November H & W Worldwide Consulting

Impact of VLTs on Lottery Ticket Sales in New York

Population trends in Hungary in the 2nd half of the 20th century and in the last 15 years

The World and U.S. Economy and San Pedro Bay Container Trade Outlook Forecast Review

Outmigration and the Changing Economy of the Great Plains

Steel: A Buyer s Market for the Worst of Reasons. John Anton Director, IHS Global Insight Steel Service August 2009

SCIENTIFIC ADVISER. In support of shooting on Welsh public land

WHERE ARE ARIZONA DEMOGRAPHICS TAKING US? HOW GROWING SLOWER, OLDER AND MORE DIVERSE AFFECTS REAL ESTATE

Relationship Between Child Pedestrian Accidents and City Planning in Zarqa, Jordan

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

Capacity of transport infrastructure networks

NC s Shifting Population: Growth, Decline, and Rebound

Safety culture in professional road transport in Norway and Greece

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

A Case Study of Leadership in Women s Intercollegiate Softball. By: DIANE L. GILL and JEAN L. PERRY

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Figure 39. Yearly Trend in Death Rates for Drowning: NSW, Year

The U.S. Economic Recovery: Why so weak and what should be done? William J. Crowder Ph.D.

Paul Bingham Managing Director, Global Trade and Transportation February 18, 2009

Page 1 of 12. ISM Survey Report December 2008

Page 1 of 12. ISM Survey Report June 2009

4. WIDER SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH

Deficit Reduction and Economic Growth: Are They Mutually Exclusive Goals? Tuesday, May 1, 2012; 2:30 PM - 3:45 PM

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

Iran Unrivalled Market in the Middle East

The global economic climate and impact on SA Mining during a downward phase in the commodity cycle.

A Profile of Plaistow South Big Local Area

The Wisconsin and Minnesota Economies: What can we learn from each other? Noah Williams

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

Quantifying the Lasting Harm to the U.S. Economy from the Financial Crisis

Transcription:

New town planning and imbalanced development: The case of Stevenage Mohammad, A. Shokouhi Department of Geography Ferdowsi University, Campus University Azadi Squre Mashhad Iran. Abstract: The major differences between British new towns and other towns is they have been designated with specific objectives and characteristics. There are some major characteristics for British new towns, which are defined by British government. One of the most important them is that they should be established and developed as balanced communities for work and living (Ogilvy [5]). It means hat the structure of employment should not be dominated by a single firm or type of industry. The pattern of employment change in Stevenage shows that the this new town during the 1960s benefited substantially from the new town programme policy, but from 1971 as a Mark I new town, it actually experienced slower growth than other towns of similar size. This new town for the first time during the 1980s experienced considerable out-migration of labour from the town. There are many reasons for this out-migration. Of particular importance is the fact that the development of Stevenage new town was mainly dependent upon a limited number of big companies. Stevenage has failed to become a balanced community. The recession of the early 1980's caused the loses of a considerable number of manufacturing jobs. Keywords: new town, balance, labour market, manufacturing 1 Introduction: The new town originates with formal recognition, and then the population and industry increases until it reaches the required size. Because of the order of development in new towns it is possible to exercise more control over the town's structure, the type of economic activity and the kind of residents, than the traditional town (Robinson, [7]). The major differences between British new towns and other towns is they have been designated with specific objectives and characteristics. There are some major characteristics for British new towns, which are defined by British government. The general characteristics of these new towns were defined by the new towns Committee chaired by Lord Reith. The Reith Committee set up in 1945, suggested guide-lines according to which such towns should be established and developed as self- contained and balanced communities for work and living (Ogilvy, [5]). Cresswell and Thomas [1] identified three criteria relating to the balanced community concept: a) that there should be a balance between population and employment ; b) that the structure of employment should not be dominated by a single firm or type of industry; c) that the new towns are not to be oneclass communities. The second meaning of balance was that the structure of employment should not be dominated by a single firm or type of industry. The reason for this is to prevent a catastrophe if the dominant industry

suffered a drop in employment, bringing about large-scale unemployment in the town. In relation to the industrial base in new towns, Cresswell and Thomas [1] and Luttrell [4] argued that the new towns have attracted mostly light industries. Cresswell and Thomas mentioned some exceptions, such as Corby with a dependence on steel, Welwyn Garden City on chemicals, Stevenage on vehicle production, (in the form of aerospace), Basildon, Cwmbran, and East Kilbride all on vehicle production. Gratton [3] who studied the industrial diversification in new towns, explains that increasing size leads to increasing diversification. The object of this paper is presnt an an tomy of the imbalanced development of Stevenage in the post war development. 2 Migration and population change The rate of population change in Stevenage is directly influenced by migration over the different stages of its development. The rate of growth of population in Stevenage new town clearly shows the process of development of this town. Data from censuses of population show that, in general, the rate of growth of Stevenage's population declined over this period. As we can see in Table 2, Stevenage's population grew significantly during the first stage (1950s) after designation by an average growth rate of 19.38%; by contrast it increased by 0.08% over the period 1981-1991, the fourth stage. If we compare Stevenage New Town and Hertfordshire County over each of the four decades, we can see that Hertfordshire's rate of population growth was similar to that of Stevenage New Town, decreasing over time; of course at a different rate. Stevenage's population increased at an average rate of 19.38% during 1951-1961, about 6.6 times faster than in Hertfordshire County, while it increased by just 0.08% over 1981-1991, less than Hertfordshire County. Stevenage New Town, because of redistribution of population in the region and the development of the New Town, grew at a considerable rate, over the period 1951-1961. By contrast over the fourth stage (1981-1991), because of considerable out-migration, the rate of population change was just 0.08% per year. As we can see in Table 3,Stevenage's first decade of development as a small town involved a large amount of in-migration into the area (about 418% of the Stevenage's population in 1951). Out-migration, with the effect of reducing Hertfordshire's population, began in the 1970s. For the first time since its designation in 1948, during the 1980s Stevenage New Town had a high level of out-migration and as a result its population growth rate was less that than of Hertfordshire. 3 Migration and the stages of development of Stevenage The results of the labour market accounts for Stevenage, indicate that this town experienced a huge amount of in-migration over the first and second stages of its development. This town experienced 393% and 32% in-migration respectively over the first and second stages. this was because of substantial growth of job opportunities in Stevenage during these stages. But, like other new towns, in the maturity and stagnation stages this town experienced a decline and even a negative change in in-migration. Stevenage for the first time in the stagnation stage experienced out-migration. As we know, there is a close relationship between change in employment structure and change in migration in Stevenage. As we can see in Table 1, there are important differences between the results for males and females. This is because of the pattern

of employment change in Stevenage new town. During the last four decades there was a growth in the service sector and a decline in the number of in manufacturing jobs in Stevenage. The pattern of change in employment structure of Stevenage has been reflected on the pattern of inmigration to the Stevenage. There was a growth in level of female in-migration and a decline in rate of male in-migration over the last four decades. It must be mentioned that the huge volume of in-migration to Stevenage during the first and second stages had an important effect on the level of population in these stages and on the growth of local labour force in third and fourth stages. 4 The importance of manufacturing in Stevenage Stevenage New Town was the first postwar New Town designated to attract population and industry from the London area. Because of this we can see a considerable change in employment in Stevenage New Town during the 1950s and 1960s. But, in common with many of the first generation New Towns, there was a considerable decline in the rate of employment change during the maturity stage, (1971-81). The important component of growth of employment in Stevenage was in the manufacturing sector. Until 1966, as much as 65% of employment in the town was in manufacturing. Consequently Stevenage, compared with most other towns in Hertfordshire, had a high proportion of its employment in manufacturing. As we can see in Table3, in 1971 just 24.7% of employment in the County was in manufacturing. However, after 1966 the proportion of manufacturing sector began to decrease as employment growth in the service sector increased (By 1971 about 57% of Stevenage's employment was in manufacturing compared with 24% in Hertfordshire). By 1981 only 40.7% of employment in Stevenage was in manufacturing compared to 35% in Hertfordshire. The Stevenage proportion decreased to 16.4% in 1991. Generally speaking, the change in employment structure was an important factor in the general trend of employment change in Stevenage. The relative importance of manufacturing employment has declined in Stevenage as service sector employment has grown. This is a reflection of national and regional trends. Stevenage New Town developed very rapidly during the 1950's and 1960's. During these decades a large number of manufacturing companies moved into the Stevenage new town. (Stevenage County Borough Council [8]). The number of jobs in Stevenage had grown rapidly between 1946 and 1981. At designation in 1946 there were about 2500 jobs in the town, this number grew rapidly to 19209 fourteen years later and to nearly 35000 jobs by 1981. During this period, as Fothergill and Gudgin [2] found, Stevenage New Town like other small towns and rural areas was successful in expanding its manufacturing base. Furthermore, this New Town during this period benefited substantially from New Towns policy. As we saw in Table 2, during the 1980s for the first time in its history as a new town, Stevenage experienced out-migration, equivalent to 8.6% of its economically active population in 1981. There are many reasons for out-migration of labour force from Stevenage during the 1980s. One of the most important is the fact that the development of Stevenage New Town was mainly dependent upon a number of limited big companies. 1 (Stevenage Borough Council, [9]). 1 These companies included English Electric Ltd (British Aerospace), de Havilland Propellers Ltd (Hawker Siddeley), Mentmore

As we know, one of the major original objectives of British New Towns was for them to be balanced communities. Cresswell and Thomas [1] defined the balanced communities as a community that the structure of employment should not be dominated by a single firm or type of industry. The reason for this was to prevent a catastrophe if the dominant industry suffered a drop in employment. It is clear that Stevenage New Town has failed to achieve this objective. Stevenage had been dominated by aerospace since the mid-1950s when the English Electric Company relocated a large part of its production to the Stevenage. By 1961, 26% of the total employment in Stevenage was in aerospace. (Philpott and Kraithman, [6]). During the early 1980s the national economy experienced a severe recession; consequently Stevenage, because of its dependence on these manufacturing companies was badly affected. Many of the companies, such as Kodak, ICI and Platignum, were closed completely; whilst others reduced their workforces (e.g British Aerospace). 5 Conclusions The results indicate that Stevenage, like other New Towns, experienced substantial growth in the level of employment and in-migration over the first stage of its development. It is clear that the migration of heads of families to the New Towns led to the growth in the level of unemployment in the town. In the maturity (third) stage, the Stevenage new town experienced a lower rate of employment change. As a result of the mismatch between labour supply and labour demand, they experienced a growth Manufacturing Co Ltd (Platignum), British Tabulators (ICL), British Visqueen (ICI) and Kodak. in the level of job-shortfall and unemployment. Furthermore, Stevenage during the fourth stage experienced out-migration. This was because of a weakness in the economic position of New Towns in this stage. Of course, out-migration and out-commuting reduced the level of unemployment and job-shortfall during this stage. The important component of growth of employment in Stevenage was in the manufacturing sector. Until 1966, as much as 65% of employment in the town was in manufacturing. Consequently Stevenage, compared with most other towns in Hertfordshire, had a high proportion of its employment in manufacturing. Furthermore, the Stevenage has always been dominated by a small number of large firms. This might therefore explain a relative lack of success in Stevenage's manufacturing industry. During 1980s, there was no growth in the demand side of the Stevenage labour market. As a result, this town, experienced an out-migration of its labour force. The decrease in demand for labour in Stevenage, was because of a considerable decline in manufacturing jobs in this town. The recession conditions of early 1980s, led to a general decline in manufacturing jobs throughout the country. Over this period, Stevenage New Town lost a considerable number of manufacturing jobs. References [1] Cresswell, P. and Thomas, R., Employment and Population Balance, in Evans, H. (ed.), New Towns : The British Experience, Charles Knight & Co. Ltd. London, PP. 66-79, 1972. [2] Fothergill, S. and Gudgin G. Unequal Growth: Urban and Regional Employment Change in the UK, Heinmann, London, 1982.

[3] Gratton, C., Industrial Diversification in New Towns, Urban Studies, Vol. 16, No.2, PP. 157-164, 1979. [4] Luttrell, W.F.C., The Growth of Industry, in Evans, H. (ed.), New Towns : The British Experience, Charles Knight & Co. Ltd. London, PP. 80-87, 1972. [5] Ogilvy, A., The Self-contained New Towns : Employment and Population, Town Planning Review, vol. 39, No 1, PP. 38-54, 1968. [6] Philpott, J.C. and Kraithman D.A., Structural Change in a New Town: The Case of Stevenage, A paper presented to the ESRC Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle, March 19th. 1986. [7] Robinson, A.J., Economics and New Towns: A Comparative Study of the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. Praeger Publishers, New York, 1975. [8] Stevenage Borough Council, People, Homes and Jobs, 1981. [9]Stevenage Borough Council, The Economic Development of Stevenage, 1946-1994, 1994.

Table 1: Population change in Stevenage New Town and Hertfordshire County 1951-1961 1961-1971 1971-1981 1981-1991 Stevenage 19.38 4.55 1.05 0.08 Hertfordshire 3.44 1.61 0.33 0.20 Note : The rate of growth of population per year. Table 2: In-migration in Stevenage New Town and Hertfordshire County 1951-1961 1961-1971 1971-1981 1981-1991 M P/M M P/ M M P/M M P/ M New Town 30597 418 7753 18 1552 2.3-6317 -8.4 County 177811 31 20964 2.6-4036 -0.4-4459 -0.5 Note : M.:Net in-migration, P/M : Ratio between population and migration Table 3: Change in employment structure in Stevenage New Town and Hertfordshire County (10%, sample) 1971 1981 1991 1971-1981 1981-1991* Services New Town 1173 1823 2384 650 557 % 37.3 51.6 66.0 20.7 14.3 County 2968 13654 33072 10686 19418 % 52.2 50.3 70.0 23.8 142.0 Manufact uring New Town 1789 1436 922-353 -515 % 56.9 40.7 16.4-19.7-13.2 County 1407 9694 9460 8287-234 % 24.7 35.7 20.0 18.5-16.0 * : These data are for Stevenage District, %:Percentage of economically active population in base year