MEMORANDUM. Date: September 22, Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority. Yongliang Zhu, Lochner

Similar documents
Analysis of Weaving, Merging, and Diverging Movements CIVL 4162/6162

BASIC FREEWAY CAPACITY STUDIES Definitions

EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES FOR THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FREEWAY WEAVING SECTIONS. Alexander Skabardonis 1 and Eleni Christofa 2

Basic Freeways and Multilane Highways (LOS) CIVL 4162/6162

HCM Sixth Edition. Plus More. Rahim (Ray) Benekohal University of Illinois at Urban Champaign,

Highway Capacity Manual 2010

Transportation Knowledge

Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

Multilane Highways 54

2009 PE Review Course Traffic! Part 1: HCM. Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP Crawford Bunte Brammeier Washington University

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

Exam 2. Two-Lane Highway Capacity and LOS Analysis. Two-lane Highway Characteristics. LOS Considerations 10/24/2009

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Training Strategies and Materials

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I)

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Operational & Geometrical Analysis Technical Memorandum

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Management of Multi-Lane Highways in Jordan (Case Study)

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP CBB Transportation Engineers + Planners ITE International President Washington University

Traffic Academy: IJS & IMS FAQ/RULES OF THUMB

Highway Capacity. 1. A traffic stream is carrying 4500 veh/hr in three lanes in one direction. What is the average headway per lane?

Updated Roundabout Analysis Methodology

Chapter Capacity and LOS Analysis of a Signalized I/S Overview Methodology Scope Limitation

February 8, Ms. Jamie Jun, Esq. Fromhold Jaffe & Adams 789 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 220 Villanova, PA 19085

7.0 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

Traffic Technical Environmental Study

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer

MEMO DRAFT VIA . Mr. Terry Bailey Foremost Development Company. To: Michael J. Labadie, PE Steven J. Russo, E.I.T. Fleis & VandenBrink.

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

HIGHWAY CONCEPTS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 12 CONTENTS

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

Production of the Post 2010 Highway Capacity Manual Chapter on Managed Lane Facilities

Place Vanier 250 Montreal Road Transportation Impact Study Addendum. Prepared for Broccolini Construction September 20 th, 2012

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

unsignalized signalized isolated coordinated Intersections roundabouts Highway Capacity Manual level of service control delay

Effects of Traffic Condition (v/c) on Safety at Freeway Facility Sections

Technical Memo. Steve Gramm, SDDOT. RE: Phase 1, Task 100: Baseline Analysis. To: From: Steve Hoff, HDR Engineering, Inc.

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Defining Purpose and Need

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT

Technical Memorandum. Subject: Interchange Ramp Terminal Configuration. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction

Offset Single Point Interchange I-25 at Rio Bravo Boulevard Albuquerque, New Mexico

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Gwinnett County Department of Transportation SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 / SR 403 Interchange Project Number F , PI No.

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REPORT. Pacheco Boulevard Alignment Study and Alternatives Analysis

I-95/Temple Avenue Interchange

Volume-to-Capacity Estimation of Signalized Road Networks for Metropolitan Transportation Planning

joint access drive. will be

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Simulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer

Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

Clay Street Realignment Project Traffic Study

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

Traffic Analysis and Design Report. NW Bethany Boulevard. NW Bronson Road to NW West Union Road. Washington County, Oregon

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.

US-6 Spanish Fork Fact Finding Study. December 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Assessing the Traffic and Energy Impacts of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs)

US 81 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM NORTH OF UNION CITY SOUTH TO SH 19 SOUTH OF CHICKASHA CANADIAN AND GRADY COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA JULY 2007

APPENDIX C Additional Traffic Data

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

James M. Moore, Director of Planning & Building Services, Town of Fairfax. Victory Village Senior Housing Development Traffic Study

Operational Ranking of Intersections: A Novel Prioritization Methodology

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.

Student Housing Development

Traffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama.

ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM Date: September 22, 2014 To: Don Skillingstad, Spokane Transit Authority From: Yongliang Zhu, Lochner Re: Attachments: Median Flyer Stop Weave Analysis West Plains Transit Center IJR Project No.: 9715 Exhibit 1: HOV Access Ramp Exhibit Exhibit 2: Base Year Model Link Volume and Actual Traffic Count Comparison Exhibit 3: Weave Analysis HCS Reports Summary On August 8, 2014, at the West Plains Transit Center Kick-Off meeting, Mike Frucci (WSDOT) expressed his concern about buses being able to accelerate from a median flyer stop located immediately west of the I-90/SR 902 interchange and exit at the I-90/SR 904 interchange to the west. Mike recommended a weave analysis to confirm that the movement was possible before continuing to study that option. In response to WSDOT s request, Lochner conducted a weave analysis for the westbound I-90 segment between the proposed West Plains Transit Center median flyer stop and SR 904 off ramp, with the methodology defined by the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, assuming 2040 as the design year. The analysis is summarized as follows: During the AM peak hour, the freeway operates at LOS B During the PM peak hour, the freeway operates at LOS C Median Flyer Stop Alternative The Medical Lake interchange is categorized as an urban interchange with a 70 mph design speed on I-90. The on-connection for the median flyer stop would have a total width of 24 and a maximum grade of 5% (See WSDOT Design Manual page 1420-12). For a left-side on-connection, WSDOT recommends a parallel on-connection, which adds a parallel lane long enough for the merging vehicle to accelerate in the lane and then merge with the through-traffic. This merge is similar to a lane change and the driver can use side- and rear-view mirrors to his or her advantage. A parallel on-connection consists of acceleration length, gap acceptance length, and taper, as shown below: 1

The length of the proposed on-connection is 4270, which includes: Acceleration length: La = 3045 (WSDOT DM page 1420-14), Gap Acceptance Length: Lg = 925 (WSDOT DM page 1420-15), and 300 taper. (WSDOT DM page 1420-13) See attached Exhibit 1 for details. During the design process, the ramp length will be adjusted to account for final profile and alignment to meet current design standards. Model Validation and Post Processing The traffic volumes for the weave analysis are taken from the Spokane Region Transportation Council (SRTC) 2040 model. Before the model being used to obtain the future traffic volumes, the preliminary checks are performed to ensure that the forecasting processes are suitable for this project. This check involved comparing the 2010 base year simulated link volumes with the actual traffic count data. A statistical measure of root-mean-square-error (RMSE) is calculated per NCHRP Report 765 Chapter 4.4. The calculation is summarized as follow: For the AM peak period, the average traffic volume for the selected links within the study area is 420 vph with a RMSE of 159. This results a traffic forecasting error of 38%, which is within the accuracy limit of 42% listed on NCHRP Report 765, page 81, Table 4-6. 2 September 09, 2014 hwlochner.com

For the PM peak period, the average traffic volume for the selected links within the study area is 468 vph with a RMSE of 153. This results a traffic forecasting error of 32%, which is close to the accuracy limit of 31% listed on NCHRP Report 765, page 81, Table 4-6. This preliminary check indicates that SRTC models are suitable for the future traffic forecasting for the study area and is also adequate for the weave analysis. The 2010 base year link volumes and actual traffic count data comparison is attached as Exhibit 2. To account for localized discrepancies between existing ground counts and model-generated volumes, a model postprocessing is utilized. This method is described as Factoring Procedure Difference Method in NCHRP 765 Chapter 6, which add the model growth increment (the difference between the 2010 and the 2040 model volumes) to the existing ground count traffic volumes. The weave analysis uses the adjusted 2040 peak hour traffic volumes coming out of the post-processing. Weave Analysis The weaving area on the westbound I-90 between the proposed West Plains Transit Center median bus lane and SR 904 off ramp is 4,360 feet long. It is considered a two-sided weave with a one-lane, left-sided on-ramp followed by a one-lane rightsided off-ramp. The traffic volumes are taken from the Spokane Region Transportation Council (SRTC) 2040 model and adjusted per NCHRP Special Report 765. The weave analyses were conducted for AM and PM peak hours for the design year 2040. They were summarized as follows: During the AM peak hour, the freeway weaving operates at LOS B with weaving segment density of 14.1 pc/mi/ln. During the PM peak hour, the freeway weaving operates at LOS C with weaving segment density of 21.5 pc/mi/ln. The detailed weaving reports are attached in Exhibit 3. Conclusion This analysis shows that a bus exiting the median flyer stop has approximately 4,360 feet after entering the freeway mainline, to change lanes and exit the freeway at SR 904. The section of I-90 between the proposed median flyer stop and the off-ramp to SR 904 is in a tangent and on level terrain. Based on these conditions and the volumes presented in the analysis, the weave distance provided, and shown in Exhibit 1, is adequate to safely make the maneuver in all weather conditions. 3

2010 Base Model Link Volume vs Traffic Count Comparison Link No. Link AM PM V (forecast) C (count) V (forecast) C (count) 1 SR 902 EB On Ramp 503 493 552 426 2 SR 902 EB Off Ramp 311 144 198 196 3 SR 902 WB On Ramp 161 140 388 198 4 SR 902 WB Off Ramp 491 368 477 400 5 SR 902 Between EB and WB Ramps NB 464 283 436 282 6 SR 902 Between EB and WB Ramps SB 642 537 717 555 7 Westbow Blvd East of Aero Rd WB 291 132 316 107 8 Westbow Blvd East of Aero Rd EB 234 85 276 92 9 Aero Rd North of Westbow Blvd NB 487 440 584 417 10 Aero Rd North of Westbow Blvd SB 473 330 511 442 11 Aero Rd South of Westbow Blvd NB 196 121 268 186 12 Aero Rd South of Westbow Blvd SB 239 203 236 201 13 Hayford Rd East of Medical lake Rd EB 380 190 305 219 14 Hayford Rd East of Medical lake Rd WB 190 115 467 287 15 Medical Lake Rd North of Hayford Rd NB 410 291 426 334 16 Medical Lake Rd North of Hayford Rd SB 448 393 456 343 17 Medical Lake Rd South of Hayford Rd NB 675 396 601 445 18 Medical Lake Rd South of Hayford Rd SB 523 427 794 518 19 SR 904 Off Ramp 853 443 886 652 Average Link Volume 420 468

Phone: E-mail: HCS 2010: Freeway Weaving Release 6.50 Fax: Operational Analysis Analyst: Yong Zhu Agency/Co.: Lochner Date Performed: 8/15/2014 Analysis Time Period: AM peak Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-90 Westbound Weaving Location: Between SR904 and SR902 Analysis Year: 2040 Description: West Plains Transit Center Inputs Segment Type Freeway Weaving configuration Two-Sided Number of lanes, N 2 ln Weaving segment length, LS 4360 ft Freeway free-flow speed, FFS 70 mi/h Minimum segment speed, SMIN 15 mi/h Freeway maximum capacity, cifl 2400 pc/h/ln Terrain type Level Grade 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Volume Components VFF VRF VFR VRR Volume, V 861 0 705 8 veh/h Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 234 0 192 2 Trucks and buses 20 0 10 100 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 0 % Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fhv 0.909 1.000 0.952 0.667 Driver population adjustment, fp 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, v 1029 0 805 13 pc/h Volume ratio, VR 0.007 Configuration Characteristics Number of maneuver lanes, NWL 0 ln Interchange density, ID 0.5 int/mi Minimum RF lane changes, LCRF 0 lc/pc Minimum FR lane changes, LCFR 0 lc/pc Minimum RR lane changes, LCRR 2 lc/pc Minimum weaving lane changes, LCMIN 26 lc/h Weaving lane changes, LCW 163 lc/h Non-weaving vehicle index, INW 400 Non-weaving lane change, LCNW 2356 lc/h Total lane changes, LCALL 2519 lc/h Weaving and Non-Weaving Speeds Weaving intensity factor, W 0.147

Average weaving speed, SW 63.0 mi/h Average non-weaving speed, SNW 65.4 mi/h Weaving Segment Speed, Density, Level of Service and Capacity Weaving segment speed, S 65.4 mi/h Weaving segment density, D 14.1 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS B Weaving segment v/c ratio 0.403 Weaving segment flow rate, v 1680 veh/h Weaving segment capacity, cw 4164 veh/h Limitations on Weaving Segments If limit reached, see note. Minimum Maximum Actual Note Weaving length (ft) 300 5793 4360 a,b Maximum Analyzed Density-based capacty, 2400 2290 c ciwl (pc/h/ln) Maximum Analyzed v/c ratio 1.00 0.403 d Notes: a. In weaving segments shorter than 300 ft, weaving vehicles are assumed to make only necessary lane changes. b. Weaving segments longer than the calculated maximum length should be treated as isolated merge and diverge areas using the procedures of Chapter 13, "Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments." c. The density-based capacity exceeds the capacity of a basic freeway segment, under equivalent ideal conditions. d. Volumes exceed the weaving segment capacity. The level of service is F.

Phone: E-mail: HCS 2010: Freeway Weaving Release 6.50 Fax: Operational Analysis Analyst: Yong Zhu Agency/Co.: Lochner Date Performed: 8/15/2014 Analysis Time Period: PM peak Freeway/Dir of Travel: I-90 Westbound Weaving Location: Between SR904 and SR902 Analysis Year: 2040 Description: West Plains Transit Center Inputs Segment Type Freeway Weaving configuration Two-Sided Number of lanes, N 2 ln Weaving segment length, LS 4360 ft Freeway free-flow speed, FFS 70 mi/h Minimum segment speed, SMIN 15 mi/h Freeway maximum capacity, cifl 2400 pc/h/ln Terrain type Level Grade 0.00 % Length 0.00 mi Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions Volume Components VFF VRF VFR VRR Volume, V 1318 0 996 8 veh/h Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Peak 15-min volume, v15 358 0 271 2 Trucks and buses 20 0 10 100 % Recreational vehicles 0 0 0 0 % Trucks and buses PCE, ET 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Recreational vehicle PCE, ER 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Heavy vehicle adjustment, fhv 0.909 1.000 0.952 0.667 Driver population adjustment, fp 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow rate, v 1576 0 1137 13 pc/h Volume ratio, VR 0.005 Configuration Characteristics Number of maneuver lanes, NWL 0 ln Interchange density, ID 0.5 int/mi Minimum RF lane changes, LCRF 0 lc/pc Minimum FR lane changes, LCFR 0 lc/pc Minimum RR lane changes, LCRR 2 lc/pc Minimum weaving lane changes, LCMIN 26 lc/h Weaving lane changes, LCW 163 lc/h Non-weaving vehicle index, INW 591 Non-weaving lane change, LCNW 2537 lc/h Total lane changes, LCALL 2700 lc/h Weaving and Non-Weaving Speeds Weaving intensity factor, W 0.155

Average weaving speed, SW 62.6 mi/h Average non-weaving speed, SNW 63.3 mi/h Weaving Segment Speed, Density, Level of Service and Capacity Weaving segment speed, S 63.3 mi/h Weaving segment density, D 21.5 pc/mi/ln Level of service, LOS C Weaving segment v/c ratio 0.595 Weaving segment flow rate, v 2479 veh/h Weaving segment capacity, cw 4167 veh/h Limitations on Weaving Segments If limit reached, see note. Minimum Maximum Actual Note Weaving length (ft) 300 5772 4360 a,b Maximum Analyzed Density-based capacty, 2400 2292 c ciwl (pc/h/ln) Maximum Analyzed v/c ratio 1.00 0.595 d Notes: a. In weaving segments shorter than 300 ft, weaving vehicles are assumed to make only necessary lane changes. b. Weaving segments longer than the calculated maximum length should be treated as isolated merge and diverge areas using the procedures of Chapter 13, "Freeway Merge and Diverge Segments." c. The density-based capacity exceeds the capacity of a basic freeway segment, under equivalent ideal conditions. d. Volumes exceed the weaving segment capacity. The level of service is F.