North Turnaround. Option 3: Best facilitates transfers from local to rapid transit services. High cost

Similar documents
NORTH TURNAROUND. Recommended Design: Expand the existing transit terminal

Changes to Traffic Circulation with Centrerunning

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

Station Plan: Penn & 43rd Avenue

MUNI FORWARD Proposed Changes: Stanyan

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

ALTERNATIVE A ONLY. Right Turn Only. BOTH ALTERNATIVES on southbound Mission from 23rd St to 25th St and on northbound Mission from 20th St to 23rd St

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Bus rapid transit network

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

Appendix K: Traffic Analysis July 2017

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Mumford Terminal Replacement Opportunities Neighbourhood Open House. we are here. PHASE 2 Identifying and Evaluating Candidate Sites

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Road Safety in Addis Ababa

Roadways. Roadways III.

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Item Description: Presentation and Discussion: Berkeley Rapid Transit Locally Preferred Alternative

Broadway Complete Streets Project

Better Market Street Project Update. Urban Forestry Council September 17, 2014

GEARY CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT Environmental Analysis. Special Intersections: Preliminary Concepts

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

Table of Contents. London BRT Transit Project Assessment Process Draft Environmental Project Report

Welcome to the Public Meeting. Red Hill Business Park South Transportation Master Plan Addendum. December 4, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit: Staff-Recommended Alternative

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Frequently Asked Questions

BRT Standard 2016 Edition. Jacob Mason Transport Research and Evaluation Manager July 26, 2016

Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project

Appendix E-1: Traffic Analysis

University Avenue & Farley Avenue/University Bay Drive Area Scenario Base Conditions Multiple concerns

York Region Rapid Transit Corporation

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Bicycle Facilities Planning

Feasibility Study of Pedestrian Crossings Along Route 7, East of Cascades Parkway and West of Dranesville Road. October 3, 2017

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Appendix Y. Guiding Traffic Control Principles for Intersection Operations

York Boulevard Streetscape Master Plan

9. TRANSIT ACCOMMODATIONS

J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

Public Information Meeting

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Welcome! Thank you for joining us today for a Geary Rapid project open house. Geary Rapid Project. SFMTA.com/GearyRapid

Superstreet Concepts & Application. Prepared by: PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. October 16, 2012

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES TABLES. Executive Summary Report: BLUE LINE

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

RICHARDS STREET UPGRADES

TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS

4 MOBILITY PLAN. Mobility Plan Objectives. Mobility Context. 1. Integrate with Local and Regional Transit Improvements

PUBLIC HEARING. for State Road (S.R.) 5/U.S. 1 Roundabout at Old Dixie Highway Flagler County, Florida. Financial Project ID No.

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

REDWOOD CITY STREETCAR - ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

Centennial Neighbourhoods Transportation Management Plan Summary of Phase 1 Consultation. Overview of Issues

THE ALAMEDA CONCEPT DESIGN COMMUNITY MEETING 3. A Plan for The Beautiful Way JANUARY 28, 2010

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Innovative Intersections

PROJECT OBJECTIVES. Improve vehicle capacity for the intersection. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access

GRTC Bus Rapid Transit: Semi-Final Design Phase Public Meetings: October 26 & 27, 2015

From Disarray to Complete Street:

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

South Park Street Bicycle Lane Improvements. Public Engagement. November 2017

C Line Rapid Bus Preliminary Station Design

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

September 20, 2016 L Taraval Rapid Project SFMTA Board of Directors Meeting

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Controlled. Semi-Controlled PAGE 01 CHAPTER 12 INTERSECTIONS

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

Washington County, Oregon

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON JANUARY 10, 2017

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Service Development 1600 Franklin Street, Oakland CA 94612

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

Municipal and School PROUD TO SERVE. Transportation Assistance

Transcription:

North Turnaround Shared Local / Rapid Transit Terminal Options 1. Expand Existing Transit Terminal or, Relocate Transit Terminal to: 2. South of Hillview Boulevard, East Side; 3. Sunnyside Drive; or, 4. South of Hillview Boulevard, West Side Rapid Transit On-Street Option 5. Maintain existing transit terminal for local services, and operate BRT services in an on-street loop Option 1: Option 2: Option 3: Option 4: Option 5: Benefits Low cost Most balanced walking distance to area developments Reasonable walking distance to area developments Acceptable walking distance to area developments Low cost Least impact on developable property Challenges Occupies highlydesirable developable area Displaces 5-10 spaces Close proximity to busy Fanshawe Park Road / Street intersection High cost High cost Occupies highlydesirable developable area Displaces 70-80 spaces (est.) Restricts left-turn movements at intersection for general traffic Poor walking distance to area developments Displaces 5-10 spaces (est.) Restricts left-turn movements at intersection for general traffic High cost Occupies highlydesirable developable area Displaces 5-10 spaces (est.) Restricts left-turn movements at intersection for general traffic Least convenient passenger transfers between local and Significant out-of-way travel and additional travel time for rapid transit services

Western University The proposed Rapid Transit route through Western University would connect Richmond Street with Western Road, supporting a reduction of car traffic on the Western University campus.

Richmond Street: Options Oxford Street to University Drive Existing Conditions: No right-turn lanes Left-turn lanes only at Grosvenor and University Option 1: 2 centre-running BRT lanes Raised median 2 general Option 2: 2 curb-side BRT lanes 2 general 1 centre left-turn lane Option 3: 2 centre running BRT lanes Raised median 4 general (2 north, 2 south) Option 4: 2 curb-side BRT lanes (1north, 1 south) 4 general (2 north, 2 south) 1 centre left-turn lane

Richmond Street North BRT Lane Options OPTION 1: 2 LANES CENTRE-RUNNING TRANSIT, 2 LANES GENERAL TRAFFIC OPTION 2: CURB-RUNNING RAPID TRANSIT, 2 LANES GENERAL TRAFFIC

Richmond Street North BRT Lane Options 2 30 OPTION 3: 2 LANES CENTRE-RUNNING TRANSIT, 4 LANES GENERAL TRAFFIC PLATFORM LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED OPTION 4: CURB-RUNNING RAPID TRANSIT, 4 LANES GENERAL TRAFFIC

Richmond Street: Comparison Oxford Street to University Drive *Placement of Transit Lanes Must Match Richmond Least Property Impacts Least Tree Impacts Least Cultural/Built Heritage Impacts Safer Left-turns More Reliable Rapid Transit Easier Midblock Access Efficient Winter Maintenance Efficient Local Transit Operations Efficient Waste Removal Option 1: 2 Centre BRT 2 general from 25 properties, and 5 full properties Impacts 90-100 trees (estimated) Option 2: 2 Curb BRT 2 general from 18 properties, and 5 full properties Impacts 70-80 trees (estimated) Option 3: 2 Centre BRT 4 general from 21 properties, and 9 full properties Impacts 170-180 trees (estimated) Option 4: 2 Curb BRT 4 general from 18 properties, and 7 full properties Impacts 170-180 trees (estimated) Options 1 and 3 have fewer conflicts between left-turning and through vehicles, meaning safer left-turns. Options 1 and 3 have more reliable rapid transit service with less interaction between buses and turning / stopping cars and trucks. Options 2 and 4 have easier access to unsignalized side streets and driveways from the centre two-way left-turn lane. Options 1 and 3 have more efficient winter maintenance with transit lanes in the centre maintained first. Options 1 and 3 have more efficient local transit Options 1 and 3 have more efficient waste removal with transit in the centre and waste removal at the curb.

Property Impacts Richmond Street Oxford Street to University Drive Your Thoughts? Tree Impacts Cultural and Built Heritage Impacts Traffic and Transit Impacts Operation Impacts and Benefits