Moving from Data Warehousing to Decision Support. Dr. Bruce Hellinga Feb. 28, 2013

Similar documents
84-88 Columbia Street West Waterloo, Ontario Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

New York s Revolutionary Transit Signal Priority Program

CITY OF HAMILTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Transportation Planning and Parking Division

IMPACT OF TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY (TSP) ON BUS TRAVEL TIMES, LATE BUS RECOVERY, DELAY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Improving the Bus Network through Traffic Signalling. Henry Axon Transport for London

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Application to Miami-Dade Transit

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Implementation Options

Bus Queue Jump (Lane) Utilization: A case study in Calgary, AB Canada Muhammad Asim P.Eng, M.Sc. The City of Calgary

Analysis of the Impacts of Transit Signal Priority on Bus Bunching and Performance

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

University of California, Davis Transit Signal Priority Implementation Study

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

Bike Routes Assessment: 95 Ave, 106 St & 40 Ave. Replace with appropriate image in View > Master.

Model Applications for Oakland Park Boulevard Transit Corridor Study

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

CHAPTER 8 APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF CONGESTION MEASURES

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Roadways. Roadways III.

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

Operational Ranking of Intersections: A Novel Prioritization Methodology

Peterborough Council on Aging

INCREASING SCHOOL-YEAR ROAD SAFETY: PROVEN STRATEGIES YOU CAN USE NOW

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

Joseph Iacobucci. James Czarnecky, AICP

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

ENCOURAGING TAXI DRIVERS TO BEHAVE: GRAFTON BRIDGE TAXI AND BUS LANE TRIAL

Complete Streets: Policy Framework Complete Streets: Implementation Plans A more Complete Street: Laurier Bike Lane Pilot Project

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

Appendix MSP Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

EE16B Designing Information Devices and Systems II

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

North Vancouver Community Associations Network. November 15, pm to 9 pm

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

URBAN AGE CONFERENCE GOVERNING URBAN FUTURES

Land at Chesterton, Cirencester

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

GEARY BRT SIMULATION VISSIM Calibration and Existing Conditions Results

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Guide to travelling to and around Panmure April 2013

Transit Signal Preemption and Priority Treatments

Public Meeting #1 January 30, 2018

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

A Comprehensive HCM 2010 Urban Streets Analysis Using HCS 2010 US 31W in Elizabethtown, KY

Appendix SEA Seattle, Washington 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Transit Signal Priority: Help or Hype? Peter G. Furth Northeastern University

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

Traffic Engineering for Optimal BRT and TSP Success

State Street Transit and Traffic Operational Plan June Æa «44 «55. Installation of Bus Bays. Land Use Activities

Appendix ELP El Paso, Texas 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

New Brunswick Strategic Planning Proposal

Alta Planning + Design

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

WDA response to O'Brien summary of recommendations dated 4 September 2017

MEMORANDUM. TO: Transportation Planning and Programming Committee December 4, 2008 of the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization

TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY The Toronto Experience

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

MARK MESSIER TRAIL LONG-RANGE PLANNING STUDY WELCOME. Mark Messier Trail Planning Study 137 Avenue to Anthony Henday Drive.

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

Appendix LOU Louisville, Kentucky 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Project MAVEN. Preliminary survey results. Ondřej Přibyl Czech Technical University in Prague Czech Republic. October 2018, Greenwich

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Development and Application of Transit Signal Priority Implementation Guidelines - A Proven Process

BURGAS INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECT. Information day, 5 th July 2011, Burgas

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Empirical Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority through Fusion of Heterogeneous Transit and Traffic Signal Data and Novel Performance Measures

POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING

February 2018 METRO TRANSIT RIDERSHIP AUDIT PROGRAM EVALUATION AND AUDIT

Chair Jim Wideman and Members of the Planning and Works Committee. Recommended Intersection Modifications at Mill Street and Ottawa Street

The Bay Bridge Corridor Congestion Study

WHAT IS BRT? Jack M. Gonsalves, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. February 22, 2012

Appendix PDX Portland, Oregon 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Edgewater Drive & Vassar Street Area Traffic Study

The Moscow Department for Transport and Road Infrastructure

Traffic Engineering for Transit Operations

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Unit 7 Speed, Travel Time and Delay Studies

EFFECTS OF TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY ON BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM. Sahil Chawla, Shalini Sinha and Khelan Modi

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

York Region Rapid Transit Corporation

Understanding Our Options, Lessons and Potential of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Graham Carey P.E., AICP November 2, 2011

CIRCLE DRIVE TRAFFIC AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDE. Management Principles and Implementation Concepts

Transcription:

Moving from Data Warehousing to Decision Support Dr. Bruce Hellinga Feb. 28, 2013

Prior to Data Warehousing Problem definition Analysis Characteristics: Limited data spreadsheet tools applicable But small sample limits confidence in results Analysis difficult to reproduce Data not (systematically) archived Ad-hoc quality control

Data Warehousing Automated data collection systems AVL/APC Farecard Data Archive (Warehouse) Characteristics: Large quantity of data Increased confidence in results, but Quality control an issue Require more robust analysis tools Analyst needs to pull data/information from warehouse to identify problems and causes

Beyond Data Warehousing Wide variety of terms in use: Decision Support System (DSS) Business Intelligence (BI) Expert System Intelligent Agent (IA) All are about automating the transformation of data to information that is useful

The Four Pillars Quality Assurance (QA) Measures Of Performance (MOP) Assisted/ Automated Diagnosis Push and Pull

Distance (km) P1: Quality Assurance Data Errors (Reality different from recorded data) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Route 51 - GRT Actual AINSLIE STREET TERMINAL SMART!CENTRES CAMBRIDGE HOLIDAY INN TERMINAL Scheduled CAMRIDGE CENTRE TERMINAL 1 Schedule deviation 0-21 -18-15 -12-9 -6-3 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 Time (minutes)

P1: Quality Assurance Data Anomalies Data are accurate but should not be used for calculating performance measures and/or for decision making

100% 85% Cumulative Relative Frequency All weather conditions Excluding snow storms Travel Time (minutes)

Distance (km) But it is not always easy to determine whether data are erroneous, anomalies, or valid! 40 ixpress 200; Departing 5:15pm 42 minutes CONESTOGA MALL 35 McCORMICK 30 UPTOWN WATERLOO 25 CHARLES TERMINAL 20 FAIRVIEW 15 10 SMART!CENTRES CAMBRIDGE 5 0 AINSLIE STREET TERMINAL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Time (minutes)

P2: Measures of Performance With rich, precise data, it is possible to compute many measures of performance, but significant care is required. Example: Schedule adherence MOP = % on-time on-time = does not depart early and does not arrive more than 3 minutes late.

Fraction of observations departing more than X seconds early 20% 18% 16% 14% 18.8% # observations (i.e. departures from time points) = 127,622 14.4% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 10.7% 7.7% 5.9% 4.6% 0% > 0s early > 15s early > 30s early > 45s early > 60s early > 75s early

P3: Automating Diagnosis Questions: 1. What are the problems? 2. What are the (likely) causes of these problems? 3. How do we solve the problem? Data Warehouse

P4: Push and Pull An Intelligent DSS should identify problems and notify the appropriate people at the appropriate time with the appropriate information so they can make the appropriate decision Relevant information (alerts) are pushed out from the system automatically Still retain the ability for an analyst to pull information for custom queries

Leveraging the data Transit data is not only valuable for the transit operator and/or transit user!

Signalized Intersections Transit Operator Delays at signalized intersections increase operating costs and decrease quality of service Can implement All of these TSP activities or queue require jump data lanes, about but where? existing conditions at the intersections AND Inadequate we LOS don t necessitates know ahead improved of time which signal timings intersections we need data for. Signals Manager Infrastructure Planning Calibrate planning models Identify corridors approaching capacity for which capital expansion will be required

Archived AVL/APC Data Stopped delay (d) Each point is from a particular bus on a given run (e.g. route, date, and time of day) Distance (X) Signalized intersection 1

d max Stopped delay (d) Can Compute: # obs Mean Stdev Percentiles X P1 X P2 Distance (X)

GIS Data Transit routes Signalized intersections

A

Stopped Delay (s) Stopped Delay (Seconds) Route 200 dn (University@Phillip to University@Albert) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Total stopped delay per service trip due to traffic signal 0 16:30 16:40 16:50 17:00 17:10 17:20 17:30 17:40 17:50 18:00 Time of Day 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 20 16 12 8 4 0 0% 20% 40% 60% Relative Frequency (%)

Relative Frequency (%) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% The stopped delays experienced by the transit vehicles are essentially the same as those experienced by general purpose vehicles! 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Stopped Delay per service trip (Seconds) TM # service trips % trips having to stop Mean of all trips (s) Mean of trips that stop (s) Std of all trips (s) COV 85 th %ile delay (s) Thru 658 44% 7.4 16.7 9.8 1.3 20

Ranking the Route Segments on the basis of signal delays 52: DUNDAS@Easton to HESPELER/WATER@Coronation/Dundas 52: KING@River to FAIRWAY@King 11: OTTAWA@Alpine to OTTAWA@Homer Watson 51: PINEBUSH@Walmart&Home Depot to HESPELER@Eagle And Pinebush 5: ERB@Beechwood And Gateview to FISCHER-HALLMAN@Thorndale 16: HOMER WATSON@Doon South Rd And Monarch Tr to HOMER 10: DOON VILLAGE@Pioneer to HOMER WATSON@ManitouAndDoon Village 201: FISCHER-HALLMAN@McGarry to FISCHER HALLMAN@Greenbrook And 10: WILSON@Kingsway to FAIRWAY@Wilson 8: Terminal to FAIRWAY@Fairview Park Mall 15: LACKNER@Keewatin to VICTORIA@Natchez 3: OTTAWA@Alpine to OTTAWA@Homer Watson 9: NORTHFIELD@Highpoint to NORTHFIELD@Skylark 53: FRANKLIN@Clyde to FRANKLIN@Savage 23: N/A to FAIRWAY@Fairview Park Mall 110: HOMER WATSON@Doon South Rd And Monarch Tr to HOMER 64: CONCESSION@Bishop to HESPELER@Dunbar 9: N/A to NORTHFIELD@Kraus 61: Terminal to HOMER WATSON@Conestoga College 21: KING@Conestoga Mall to KING@Northfield 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Mean Stopped Delay (s)

Route + Section Name Mean Delay 90th Percentile Delay (s) Queue (m) Proportion of Trips Experiencing Signal Delay (%) 52: DUNDAS@Easton to HESPELER/WATER@Coronation/Dundas 50.2 102.0 127.0 85% 325 52: KING@River to FAIRWAY@King 41.0 83.9 106.0 81% 385 11: OTTAWA@Alpine to OTTAWA@Homer Watson 39.1 64.0 189.0 85% 268 51: PINEBUSH@Walmart&Home Depot to HESPELER@Eagle And Pinebush 39.0 101.0 102.0 58% 280 5: ERB@Beechwood And Gateview to FISCHER-HALLMAN@Thorndale 37.8 87.0 76.0 76% 258 16: HOMER WATSON@Doon South Rd And Monarch Tr to HOMER WATSON@Conestoga College 36.6 98.0 121.0 57% 134 10: DOON VILLAGE@Pioneer to HOMER WATSON@ManitouAndDoon Village 34.4 69.4 91.0 81% 201 201: FISCHER-HALLMAN@McGarry to FISCHER HALLMAN@Greenbrook And Hwy 7And8 WB Rmp 33.4 82.0 152.0 52% 445 10: WILSON@Kingsway to FAIRWAY@Wilson 32.1 64.7 120.0 71% 258 8: Terminal to FAIRWAY@Fairview Park Mall 32.1 74.1 162.0 84% 258 15: LACKNER@Keewatin to VICTORIA@Natchez 31.7 72.7 76.0 77% 234 3: OTTAWA@Alpine to OTTAWA@Homer Watson 31.3 81.0 154.0 60% 181 9: NORTHFIELD@Highpoint to NORTHFIELD@Skylark 31.1 65.0 76.0 69% 189 53: FRANKLIN@Clyde to FRANKLIN@Savage 31.1 71.0 76.0 79% 310 23: N/A to FAIRWAY@Fairview Park Mall 30.8 75.0 131.0 65% 255 110: HOMER WATSON@Doon South Rd And Monarch Tr to HOMER WATSON@Conestoga College 30.0 87.7 107.0 56% 129 64: CONCESSION@Bishop to HESPELER@Dunbar 29.7 69.9 91.0 69% 283 9: N/A to NORTHFIELD@Kraus 29.6 69.4 76.0 75% 190 61: Terminal to HOMER WATSON@Conestoga College 29.5 69.8 91.0 64% 220 21: KING@Conestoga Mall to KING@Northfield 28.7 64.0 119.0 57% 122 Num Obs

R52Up; DUNDAS@Easton to HESPELER/WATER@Coronation/Dundas

Route + Section Name Mean Delay 90th Percentile Delay (s) Queue (m) Proportion of Trips Experiencing Signal Delay (%) 52: DUNDAS@Easton to HESPELER/WATER@Coronation/Dundas 50.2 102.0 127.0 85% 325 52: KING@River to FAIRWAY@King 41.0 83.9 106.0 81% 385 11: OTTAWA@Alpine to OTTAWA@Homer Watson 39.1 64.0 189.0 85% 268 51: PINEBUSH@Walmart&Home Depot to HESPELER@Eagle And Pinebush 39.0 101.0 102.0 58% 280 5: ERB@Beechwood And Gateview to FISCHER-HALLMAN@Thorndale 37.8 87.0 76.0 76% 258 16: HOMER WATSON@Doon South Rd And Monarch Tr to HOMER WATSON@Conestoga College 36.6 98.0 121.0 57% 134 10: DOON VILLAGE@Pioneer to HOMER WATSON@ManitouAndDoon Village 34.4 69.4 91.0 81% 201 201: FISCHER-HALLMAN@McGarry to FISCHER HALLMAN@Greenbrook And Hwy 7And8 WB Rmp 33.4 82.0 152.0 52% 445 10: WILSON@Kingsway to FAIRWAY@Wilson 32.1 64.7 120.0 71% 258 8: Terminal to FAIRWAY@Fairview Park Mall 32.1 74.1 162.0 84% 258 15: LACKNER@Keewatin to VICTORIA@Natchez 31.7 72.7 76.0 77% 234 3: OTTAWA@Alpine to OTTAWA@Homer Watson 31.3 81.0 154.0 60% 181 9: NORTHFIELD@Highpoint to NORTHFIELD@Skylark 31.1 65.0 76.0 69% 189 53: FRANKLIN@Clyde to FRANKLIN@Savage 31.1 71.0 76.0 79% 310 23: N/A to FAIRWAY@Fairview Park Mall 30.8 75.0 131.0 65% 255 110: HOMER WATSON@Doon South Rd And Monarch Tr to HOMER WATSON@Conestoga College 30.0 87.7 107.0 56% 129 64: CONCESSION@Bishop to HESPELER@Dunbar 29.7 69.9 91.0 69% 283 9: N/A to NORTHFIELD@Kraus 29.6 69.4 76.0 75% 190 61: Terminal to HOMER WATSON@Conestoga College 29.5 69.8 91.0 64% 220 21: KING@Conestoga Mall to KING@Northfield 28.7 64.0 119.0 57% 122 Num Obs

R11IB; OTTAWA@Alpine to OTTAWA@Homer Watson 189m

Key Points Need to get the pillars right! QA; MOP; Diagnosis; Push & Pull Automating Diagnosis is not trivial but big payback Leverage the Archived AVL/APC data Distribute cost of DSS over more entities in organization.

Thank you! Email: bhellinga@uwaterloo.ca Web: www.civil.uwaterloo.ca/bhellinga www.wpti.uwaterloo.ca

Photo Sources Slide 2: http://paraelink.org/bmk3k4/bmk3k4_3.htm Slide 3: GRT buses: www.therecord.com; GPS: www.gpscentral.ca; Passenger counter: www.parvus.com Slide 6: detour sign: http://embracingthedetour.com/detours-part-ii-day-52/; snow: www.guelphmercurary.com; Octoberfest parade: www.therecord.com; temporary bus stop: www.flickr.com