Maryland Thoroughbred and Harness Horse Racing Tracks

Similar documents
Maryland Thoroughbred and Harness Horse Racing Tracks

Maryland Thoroughbred and Harness Horse Racing Tracks

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Special Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK September 2015

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 9, 2017

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2005 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development 2-12

80th Oregon Legislative Assembly 2019 Regular Session PRELIMINARY

IC Chapter 7. Conduct of Gambling Games at Racetracks

ANNUAL REPORT MARYLAND RACING COMMISSION NINETY-SEVENTH STATE OF MARYLAND

ARTICLE 14. CASINO SIMULCASTING

LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH COMMISSION PDF VERSION

RACING AND WAGERING BOARD HORSE RACING ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES. Report 2004-S-62 OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER DIVISION OF STATE SERVICES

U.S. 1, , 2000 JANUARY

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2004 Session

Funding Agreement & New Ontario Racing Overview. Spring 2018

William Crawford, Executive Director Ohio State Racing Commission

Office of the County Auditor 115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room 520 Fort Lauderdale, Florida FAX

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE

Enabling Legislation New York Thoroughbred Breeding and Development Fund

TRPB TOTE SECURITY SYSTEM

Working Draft: Gaming Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION SENATE BILL DRS45071-MQf-19. Short Title: Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting. (Public)

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE

New York Racing By the Numbers in 2005

SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to pari-mutuel wagering. (BDR )

Minnesota Racing Commission

THE ULTIMATE BETTING CHALLENGE Saturday, March 9, 2019 OFFICIAL RULES

CHAPTER 551 SLOT MACHINES Powers and duties of the division and law enforcement.

Laurel Racing Association Limited Partnership

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

Slot machines and slot machine components

SEMINOLE COMPACT , FS 1 Ratifies the 2015 Gaming Compact executed by the Governor- with required, specified amendments.

An Bille um Rásaíocht Capall Éireann, 2015 Horse Racing Ireland Bill Meabhrán Mínitheach Explanatory Memorandum

A REPORT BY THE NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER

[First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 10, 2018

11/2/2015. The Horse Racing Industry in Delaware. A Little History on the Sport. More. Mark Davis

Department of Legislative Services 2012 Session

CHAPTER 25. ENTRIES AND DECLARATIONS

Audit Report. Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General

New York State Assembly Sheldon Silver, Speaker

The Economic Impact of Colonial Downs in Virginia

RACING AND ATHLETICS REGULATION 6 SIMULCAST WAGERING

S 0037 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE. Education Funding Act of 2007

CHAPTER 9 RULES FOR PARI-MUTUEL BETTING

CHAPTER 65. PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

CHAPTER 65. PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Department of Legislative Services

[First Reprint] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 24, 2018

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE IOWA RACE HORSE INDUSTRY ON THE IOWA ECONOMY

1. DEFINITIONS. 1.1 In these Rules, unless otherwise specified:

Session of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Federal and State Affairs 2-21

Video Lottery/Tourism Promotion

The NSW Greyhound Breeders, Owners & Trainers Association

U.S. 1, 1999, 30, 2001 JANUARY

OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION

Effect of Proposed Lawrence Downs Casino and Racing Resort on Racing in Western Pennsylvania

AUDIT REPORT. Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General

New York Racing By the Numbers in 2006

Proponents of expanding gambling in. tracks will save the horse industry by increasing i purses for horse races by

2019 State of the New Jersey Horse Racing Industry

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL PROGRAMS REGULATION SECTION

Proposed Changes to 205 CMR 6.00 Pari-mutuel rules for thoroughbred racing, harness racing, and greyhound racing.

OFFICIAL RULES: THE 2018 SANTA ANITA PREAKNESS CHALLENGE, PRESENTED BY WHT ENTERPRISES, LLC

HORSE RACING AND CALIFORNIA FAIRS

CHAPTER 551 SLOT MACHINES Slot machine gaming authorized Definitions Powers and duties of the division and law enforcement.

New York State Racing by the Numbers in 2008

TEXAS LOTTERY COMMISSION INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

PEGASUS WORLD CUP BETTING CHAMPIONSHIP Gulfstream Park January 25 & 26, 2019

INFORMATION ON AND APPLICATION TO USE ACT RACE FIELD INFORMATION

A Bill Regular Session, 2005 SENATE BILL 999

FINAL CERTIFICATION RETURN YEAR ENDED ON JUNE 2017 NSW Harness Race Field Information Use

Ch. 870 SUPER 6 LOTTO CHAPTER 870. SUPER 6 LOTTO

Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998

Authorized By: New Jersey Racing Commission, Frank Zanzuccki Executive Director

STAFF PAPER. TRG Agenda ref 47. November 9, 2015

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session

Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

PART V. HARNESS RACING COMMISSION

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No ASSEMBLY BUDGET COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: DECEMBER 15, 2014

REVISED PROPOSED RULE CHANGES

SB 8 - GAMING SALE OF LOTTERY TICKETS AT POINT-OF-SALE TERMINALS

Report on Horse Racing

THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM HORSES

LICENSED DRIVERS BETTING POLICY HARNESS RACING VICTORIA

Atlantic Provinces Harness Racing Commission Act

SINGAPORE edevelopment LIMITED (Incorporated in Singapore) (Company Registration No W)

New York State Assembly Carl E. Heastie Speaker. Committee on. Racing and Wagering. J. Gary Pretlow Chair

Amendment 80 Non-AFA Trawl Gear Catcher/Processor

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION No. 38 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2014 SESSION

OKLAHOMA HORSE RACING COMMISSION REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING MAY 21, 2015 MINUTES

Hearing on Keno Bingo & Slots IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. June 17, :00 a.m.

O L A. Gambling Regulation and Oversight OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF MINNESOTA EVALUATION REPORT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

AUDIT U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WILDLIFE AND SPORT FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM GRANTS

In addition to the definitions provided in Paragraph 1.2 of Rule 1 and Rule 10, and unless the context in this Amended Rule 10.A otherwise requires:

Financial Condition of New York State Regional Off-Track Betting Corporations

AUDIT REPORT. Report No. R-GR-FWS

Transcription:

Audit Report Maryland Thoroughbred and Harness Horse Racing Tracks August 2012 OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITS DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY

This report and any related follow-up correspondence are available to the public through the Office of Legislative Audits at 301 West Preston Street, Room 1202, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. The Office may be contacted by telephone at 410-946-5900, 301-970-5900, or 1-877- 486-9964. Electronic copies of our audit reports can be viewed or downloaded from our website at http://www.ola.state.md.us. Alternative formats may be requested through the Maryland Relay Service at 1-800-735-2258. The Department of Legislative Services Office of the Executive Director, 90 State Circle, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 can also assist you in obtaining copies of our reports and related correspondence. The Department may be contacted by telephone at 410-946-5400 or 301-970-5400.

2

Background Information Racetracks The thoroughbred and harness racing tracks are licensed by the State of Maryland to conduct live racing and accept wagering on simulcast racing from other facilities throughout the United States. Details of live race days and wagering at the racetracks for calendar year 2010 are provided in the following table: Type of Racing Thoroughbred Harness Calendar Year 2010 Racetrack Activity Racetrack Live Pari-mutuel Race Wagering Days Laurel Park 119 $125,286,760 Pimlico Race Course 20 $63,646,054 Timonium Race Course 7 $1,694,243 Rosecroft Raceway 0 $11,184,716 Ocean Downs Racetrack 4 $11,568,851 Total 150 $213,380,624 Source: Maryland Racing Commission records (unaudited) Status of Licensees There were two transfers of ownership, affecting three racetracks, since our preceding audit report dated September 2, 2010. Both license transfers were approved by the Maryland Racing Commission. A recent financial statement audit for another licensee raised substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going concern. Maryland Racing, Incorporated (MRI), through the Maryland Jockey Club, owns Laurel Park and Pimlico Race Course. Ownership of MRI was transferred from its co-owners, MI Developments, Incorporated, and Penn National Gaming, Incorporated, to the Stronach Trust on July 1, 2011. A new parent company of Rosecroft Raceway, Penn National Gaming, Incorporated, reopened the racetrack to live racing on October 21, 2011. The racetrack had been closed since July 2010 due to bankruptcy under a different licensee (Cloverleaf Enterprises, Incorporated). In its fiscal year 2011 audited financial statement report, which was submitted subsequent to the completion of our audit fieldwork, the Ocean Downs Racetrack independent auditor commented that recurring losses from 3

operations and cash flow deficiencies raised substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going concern. Automated Online Wagering Systems Wagers at racetracks, both in Maryland and throughout the United States, are recorded electronically by use of various automated systems. In Maryland, racetracks generally use one system to transmit wagering transactions and compute the payoff of winning bets, and another system to compute deductions, such as for purses, State taxes, and simulcast signal fees. Status of Finding From Preceding Audit Report Our audit included a review to determine the status of the finding contained in our preceding audit report dated September 2, 2010. We determined that the finding was not satisfactorily addressed and is repeated in this report. 4

Scope, Objectives, and Methodology Scope We have audited the licensees for the following racetracks for the period beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2011: Laurel Park Pimlico Race Course Timonium Race Course Rosecroft Raceway Ocean Downs Racetrack These racetracks are licensed by the Maryland Racing Commission (the Commission) to conduct live thoroughbred and harness racing in Maryland, and to accept wagering on simulcast racing from other facilities throughout the United States. The purpose of this audit was to determine the licensees compliance with certain State laws, rules, and regulations. We also determined the status of the finding included in our preceding audit report. The Business Regulation Article, Section 11-313 of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires the Office of Legislative Audits to audit the licensees of thoroughbred and harness racing tracks at least once every two years in accordance with the provisions of the State Government Article, Sections 2-1217 through 2-1227, of the Annotated Code of Maryland. Our audit was performed in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. Objectives The three objectives of our audit were to determine whether 1. licensees disclosed all forms of ownership, as defined by the Annotated Code of Maryland, to the Commission; 2. various systems used by licensees to distribute wagering revenues, including taxes due the State, generated reliable financial information; and 5

3. licensees complied with certain requirements of State law (such as having an annual audit performed of the financial statements for each racetrack, and properly using revenue from video lottery proceeds), as well as with licensing requirements of the Commission contained in the Code of Maryland Regulations. Methodology To accomplish our objectives, we interviewed various individuals employed by the licensees. In addition, we reviewed applicable State laws, as well as records maintained by the Commission. Furthermore, independent auditors for Laurel Park, Pimlico Race Course, Rosecroft Raceway, and Ocean Downs Racetrack performed certain agreed-upon procedures to provide assurances regarding the accuracy of wagering revenues collected and the related distributions during the audit period. 1 The related reports disclosed no material deficiencies. We have relied on the work of the independent auditors to provide audit coverage of wagering revenues collected and related distributions. Therefore, our audit procedures in these areas were generally limited to obtaining a sufficient basis for that reliance. The financial statements of each licensee are to be audited annually by independent auditors for the purpose of expressing opinions on the fair presentation of the licensees financial statements. We reviewed the available financial statements and the related independent auditors reports for 2009 and 2010 (most of which are on a calendar year basis) to ensure the audits had been completed as required by State law and to determine if any other conditions existed that would impact our audit objectives. In each report issued, 2 the auditors stated that the licensees financial statements presented fairly, in all material respects, their respective financial positions, results of operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. 1 Due to the limited number of racing days (seven) at Timonium Race Course, and because the Maryland Jockey Club (which operates Laurel Park and Pimlico Race Course) provided the pari-mutuel staff and expertise during those seven days of racing, agreed-upon procedures were not conducted for Timonium Race Course. For similar reasons, we also excluded such procedures from our scope. Nevertheless, an independent accounting firm, under contract to the Maryland Racing Commission, monitors the wagering and payments at each of the five tracks whenever racing is conducted. 2 Three of the five licensees had not obtained required audited financial statements (see Finding 1). 6

Our fieldwork was completed during the period from October 2011 to February 2012. A copy of this draft report was provided to each licensee and to the Commission. The Commission s response to our findings and recommendations is included as an appendix to this report and represents the consolidated views of the Commission and the licensees. Separate written responses to this report were not requested from the licensees. As prescribed in the State Government Article, Section 2-1224 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, we will advise the Commission regarding the results of our review of its response. 7

Conclusions We concluded that, for the licensees tested, all forms of ownership were properly reported to the Maryland Racing Commission as required by law. In addition, based on our review of the work performed by other auditors, no material deficiencies were disclosed regarding the various systems used by the licensees to distribute wagering revenues, including taxes due to the State from wagering. However, we noted that certain racetracks had not obtained audited financial statements, as required by State law. We also noted that a written agreement regarding the allocation of certain revenue at two racetracks had not been executed. Financial Statements Findings and Recommendations Finding 1 Audited financial statements had not been completed as required by State law. Analysis Three of the five licensees had not obtained audited financial statements, as required by State law, due to certain financial issues associated with the licensees. Specifically, as of June 4, 2012, one licensee (Rosecroft) had not obtained audited financial statements for two fiscal years, covering the period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010. In addition, two licensees (Laurel and Pimlico) had not obtained audited financial statements for the period from January 1, 2009 through April 30, 2010. We were advised that the financial statements were not audited during these periods due to the bankruptcy status of the entities that previously owned controlling interests in the racetracks. In our preceding audit report, the financial statements for two of these licensees (Laurel and Pimlico) for fiscal year 2008 (January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008) were not issued. These financial statements also remain outstanding. Because of the changes in ownership, Maryland Racing Commission management advised us that it believes it is unlikely to receive these outstanding financial statements. The Business Regulation Article, Title 11-313 (b) of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires licensees to submit audited financial statements within 90 days of the end of the fiscal year. 8

Recommendation 1 We recommend that the Commission work with the licensees to ensure that audited financial statements are completed in accordance with the requirements of State law (repeat). Finding 2 Two racetracks had not entered into formal agreements concerning the allocation of simulcast funds used for purses. Analysis Two thoroughbred racetracks (Laurel and Pimlico) had not entered into formal agreements with the organizations that represent trainers and breeders concerning how to allocate the revenue received from simulcast races at Maryland racetracks. Instead, we were advised that only an oral agreement to allocate the funds is in place. According to licensee records, simulcast revenue for the two racetracks totaled $15.3 million during calendar year 2010. State law requires that revenue from simulcast races in this state shall be allocated to the licensee, purse, and applicable bred fund according to the agreement made by the licensee, licensed owners and trainers, and breeders. Recommendation 2 We recommend that the racetracks execute written agreements with organizations that represent trainers and breeders as to how to allocate the revenue from simulcast races. 9

AUDIT TEAM Stephen C. Pease, CPA Audit Manager Joel E. Kleiman, CPA Senior Auditor