The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey

Similar documents
RESEARCH Massachusetts Recreational Boater Survey. Project Summary

APPENDIX A SURVEY FORM

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

Coastal and marine recreation in New England is ingrained in the region s economic and

June NMFS Address 11, 2014 (NOAA): Council Address. Dover, DE 19901

Economic Impact Analysis BOONE DOCKS RESORT AND MARINA, LLC

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

Cost-Earnings Data Collection for the Hawaii Small Boat Fishery

Angler Spending on Fishing-related Durable Goods: Results from the 2014 Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

The University of Georgia

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

The Economic Contribution of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Angling Permit Holders in New England and the Mid-Atlantic, 2011

Recreational Saltwater Fishing Industry Trends and Economic Impact January 2007

NOTICE: This publication is available at:

The Nevada 1st Congressional District

Economic Analysis of Recreational Fishing in the Proposed GRNMS Research Area Updated April,

Office of Science & Technology

NOAA Fisheries Recrea.onal Fisheries Economics & Human Dimensions Program

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

The Economic Significance of Florida Bay. Dr. Andrew Stainback GEER April Coral Springs, Florida

Surfrider s Recreational Use Survey and Marine Spatial Planning in Washington State. Gus Gates- WA Policy Manager

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Economics of Large (>200 anglers) Fishing Tournaments at Lake Fork, Texas

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore

A Comparison of Highway Construction Costs in the Midwest and Nationally

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

The Operations and Economics of the For-Hire Fishing Fleets of the South Atlantic States and the Atlantic Coast of Florida

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE HORSE INDUSTRY

Integration of Sustainable Development on Long Island s Coastal Industries 1

Atlantic Striped Bass Draft Addendum V. Atlantic Striped Bass Board May 9, 2017

Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea

Ohio Sea Grant ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LAKE ERIE ON NORTHERN OHIO. Ohio State University Sea Grant Program. AGI HDlOl. no.604. c.6

Big Blue Adventure Event Analysis UTC Tourism Center October 2016

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Summer Flounder. Wednesday, April 26, Powered by

OR DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY:

Montauk Beach Restoration Project. Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York January 2013

Balance in the Bay. An introduction to ecosystem-based management and the Monterey Bay market squid fishery.

Florida Boating Access Facilities Inventory and Economic Study including a Pilot Study for Lee County Executive Summary

Fishery Dependent Data Collection Office of Science and Technology

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Team OCEAN at Rookery Bay

2006 Economic Assessment of the Connecticut Commercial Lobster Industry Robert Pomeroy, Nancy Balcom and Emily Keiley

Marine Recreational and Commercial Industries and Activities in Lee and Charlotte Counties: Economic Consequences and Impacts

Economic Impact of the Recreational Fisheries on Local County Economies in California s National Marine Sanctuaries 2010, 2011 and 2012

National Survey for Wales Key Facts for Policy and Practice

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

Brook Trout Angling in Maine2009 Survey Results

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

Chesapeake Bay Jurisdictions White Paper on Draft Addendum IV for the Striped Bass Fishery Management Plan

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SKI AREAS ON THE ECONOMY OF NORTH CAROLINA SEASON. Final Report

WILMAPCO Public Opinion Survey Summary of Results

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS 3 rd Quarter 2015 Report

2001 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH (Cynoscion regalis)

The 2010 Economic Contribution of Tourism to the Meadowlands Liberty Region

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS 2 nd Quarter 2016 Report

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling

Some Steps Towards Climate-Ready Management of U.S. Fisheries

Presentation on Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Interstate Flow in the Northeast in 2014 November 13, 2017

Habitat Omnibus Amendment DEIS draft sections relative to recreational fishery DRAFT. Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

110 Edgar Martinez Drive South P.O. Box Seattle, WA (206) August 15, 2018

COASTAL TOURISM TESTED BY CLIMATE CHANGE. by Pearl Macek. Aerial photographs by John Supancic

NOAA Marine Debris Program

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Closure Memo

Summary of Findings and Historical Commentary

INDUSTRY STATISTICS & RESEARCH RECREATIONAL BOATING. Statistical Abstract $950

Recreational Boating Industry

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Julie Horowitz, Shellfish Policy Advisor Governor s Legislative Affairs and Policy Office

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

Taking Recreational Fishing and Boating to the next level

Update on the 2017 Atlantic Menhaden Fishing Season

Demand for Harbors, Dockage, and Other Navigational Needs for Small Boats and Commercial Fishing Vessels in Alaska

Boating Safety Account Continuation Review

A Bioeconomic Model of the Recreational Gulf of Maine Cod and Haddock Fishery

Appendix 13 Rowing and sculling in the sea

ADVANCING NATURAL GAS IN THE MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS MARKET

The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina

Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Recreational Management Measures for the

THE IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL CRABBING ON NORTH CAROLINA S CRAB POPULATION

Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan: New England

NOAA Fisheries Update:

National Standard 10 Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking New England Fishery Management Council

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS

Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing for Bonefish, Permit and Tarpon in Belize for 2007

Socioeconomic Values of Reefs in Monroe County

A USERS GUIDE TO MOORINGS IN DARTMOUTH

Spatial/Seasonal overlap between the midwater trawl herring fishery and predator focused user groups

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Transcription:

The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey April 2016

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 1 CONTENTS 30TABOUT THE SPONSORS30T... 2 30TEXECUTIVE SUMMARY30T... 3 30TSURVEY OVERVIEW30T... 5 30TECONOMIC IMPACTS30T... 7 30TOn-Water Trips30T... 7 30TInterstate Spending: On-Water Trips30T... 7 30TSpending on Non On-Water Trips30T... 8 30TInterstate Spending: Non On-Water Visits30T... 8 30TGeneral Annual Expenses30T... 9 30TInterstate Spending: General Annual Expenses30T... 10 30THurricane Sandy30T... 10 30TBOATER BEHAVIOR30T... 11 30TMonthly Boat Visits30T... 11 30TMonthly On-Water Trips30T... 11 30TOvernight Trips30T... 12 30TDistance to Boat30T... 12 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared by the Monmouth University Urban Coast Institute (UCI) based on survey data collected in partnership with the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO). The survey was conducted by the Center for Survey Research at the University of Massachusetts-Boston with funding from Office for Coastal Management (OCM), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The statements, findings, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or the U.S. Department of Commerce. The UCI wishes to extend a special thanks to the students of Monmouth University Professor Richard Bastian s fall 2015 Statistical Consulting course for their contributions to this effort. The students were responsible for decoding and analyzing survey data provided by the consultant and extrapolated the statistics presented in this report.

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 2 ABOUT THE SURVEY SPONSORS The Monmouth University Urban Coast Institute The Urban Coast Institute (UCI) was established in 2005 as one of Monmouth University s Centers of Distinction. The UCI s mission is to serve Monmouth University and the public interest as a forum for research, education and collaboration in the development and implementation of science-based policies and programs that support stewardship of healthy, productive and resilient coastal ecosystems and communities. www.monmouth.edu/uci The Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean Established in 2009 by the Governors of New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO) provides a forum for our coastal Mid-Atlantic states to collaborate on shared regional priorities related to marine habitats, renewable offshore energy, climate change adaptation, and ocean water quality. MARCO has initiated and oversees the Mid-Atlantic Ocean Data Portal to assist the region with ocean planning efforts. midatlanticocean.org

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recreational boating is deeply ingrained in the economy and cultural fabric of the Mid-Atlantic region. Nearly a half-million privately owned vessels that were believed to be used for recreation on ocean waters were registered in the states of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia in 2013. However, there has historically been little documented data about the details of recreational saltwater boating, such as how much money people spend to support their activities, the duration of trips, and when and where boats visit. This report provides a snapshot of recreational boater spending and activities in the four states. It is based on data collected during a six-month Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey effort led by the Monmouth University Urban Coast Institute (UCI) and the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO) and conducted by the University of Massachusetts Boston Center for Survey Research and EcoTrust in 2013. The report s completion marks the final phase of a two-part project. The Mid- Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey asked respondents to complete questionnaires regarding their spending and trip activities summarized in this report while also using an online program to map their trip routes. The mapped data was uploaded to the Mid-Atlantic Ocean Data Portal (30Tportal.midatlanticocean.org30T) in 2015. The results of the questionnaires are presented here for the first time.

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 4 Respondents were asked to complete a survey each month from the May to October boating season that contained questions about their most recent boat trips. They were also given an end of season survey in October that included questions about other general expenses of owning a boat. Among the results: Boat owners and their parties spent an average of $318 per on-water trip. The largest expenses were maintenance/equipment/repairs ($86), fuel/oil ($78) and food/drinks ($50). Boat owners and their parties spent an average of $727 during visits to their vessels that didn t involve on-water trips. The largest expenses were maintenance/equipment/repairs ($474), transient/guest dockage ($78) and food/drinks ($61). Total expenditures for an end of season survey which covered general annual expenses of owning a boat such as financing, insurance fees, storage and documentation fees, were placed at $7,722. The economic impact of recreational boating crosses state lines. Respondents reported that on 14% of on-water trips, at least some portion of their expenses occurred outside of the state where their boat was launched. New Jersey owners took their boats on the water most frequently throughout the season (5.05 days per month), while Marylanders were on the water an average of 5.71 days in July the most by any state for a single month. The average monthly total for all four states was 4.68 days. Delaware boat owners took the most overnight trips (2.4 days per month). The average for all four states was 1.46 days. Virginians traveled the furthest to the site where their boats were launched 65.62 miles per round trip. The average for the four states was 57.25 miles. 7% of respondents reported their boats were damaged during Superstorm Sandy. Of those, 52% received a small amount of damage, 36% saw moderate damage and 12% saw a large amount of damage.

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 5 SURVEY OVERVIEW The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey was actually a series of surveys conducted monthly from May through October of 2013. Each survey asked respondents to reflect back on their boating activity from the previous month and describe their most recent on-water trip on Mid-Atlantic coastal waters. If respondents visited their boat during the month but didn t take it on the water, they were asked a series of alternate but similar questions about their spending on the trip. The final (October) survey also contained an end-of-season component in which boaters were asked about general expenses of owning the vessel. The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey was patterned closely after 2010 and 2012 projects focused on the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut and New York. The Mid-Atlantic questionnaire was very similar to the one used in the 2012 Northeast survey, which allowed for the collection of consistent data from the two regions that could be compared directly. One notable difference with the Mid-Atlantic survey was the inclusion of questions about how boaters were affected by Superstorm Sandy, which occurred in the fall of 2012. The survey team considered several approaches for collecting trip data. Ultimately, it was determined that asking respondents about their most recent trip would provide the most accurate results and best response rates, since it would be easy to understand, respondents would be more likely to remember their trip details and summarizing a single trip would be less time-consuming than other alternatives. It was not deemed feasible to ask about each trip taken during the month, since it risked overburdening respondents. Asking about a randomly chosen trip during the month was considered, but determined to be too confusing. Another component of the survey asked boaters to map the exact route taken during the monthly trip using a web-based mapping application. That data was integrated in 2015 in the Mid-Atlantic Ocean Data Portal (30Tportal.midatlanticocean.org30T), an interactive ocean mapping and information website focused on the coasts of New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia.

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 6 The sample for this study came from five separate databases. Four of these were the state databases of registered boaters and the fifth was a Coast Guard database of documented vessels. This included boats with a current valid registration, designated for recreational use, at least 10 feet long, and to the extent possible, known to be for use on ocean waters. Overall, a total of 475,596 boats were found to be eligible for the study from across the four states. Virginia had the most eligible boats with 207,266, followed by New Jersey with 144,568, Maryland with 93,039 and Delaware with 30,723. A sample of 32,000 boats from across the region was selected for potential inclusion in the survey. In April of 2013, all 32,000 sample boat owners were mailed a short recruitment survey that sought to determine their eligibility through two questions. The first question asked whether they still owned the boat selected from the recreational boat databases. The second question inquired as to whether they used the boat, at least partially, on saltwater. If the answer to either question was no, the boat owner could not participate in the survey. Of the 31,947 recruitment surveys that were assumed to be delivered to boat owners (53 were returned as bad addresses), a total of 940 were completed online. Sample map from the Mid-Atlantic Ocean Data Portal showing boater route and activity data submitted by survey respondents. A total of 715 respondents were ultimately deemed eligible and completed a survey one or more times throughout the six-month survey period. This included 300 participants from Maryland, 249 from New Jersey, 97 from Virginia and 69 from Delaware.

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 7 ECONOMIC IMPACTS On-Water Trips Respondents were asked to specify how much money was spent on a list of common expenses during their last on-water trip of the survey month. Category Mean Spending Equipment, maintenance, repairs $85.56 and upkeep Boat fuel and oil $77.92 Restaurant meals & drinks $49.59 Groceries $23.56 Transient/guest dockage (marina $22.99 fee) Auto gas and oil $20.92 Fishing gear, bait, ice, etc. $13.70 Recreation and entertainment $7.97 Lodging (hotel/motel) $6.60 Shopping and souvenirs $3.73 Lodging (camping/b&b) $2.61 Launch fees $1.95 Pump out fees $0.42 Total: $317.52 Interstate Spending: On-Water Trips Respondents were asked approximately what percent of the total spending they listed for their last on-water trips occurred in the state where they launched or boarded their boats. Spending in State Percent of Respondents 0% 2.14% 1%-10% 0.84% 11%-20% 0.76% 21%-30% 0.31%

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 8 31%-40% 0.69% 41%-50% 0.76% 51%-60% 1.14% 61%-70% 0.84% 71%-80% 2.06% 81%-90% 2.82% 91%-99% 2.06% 100% 85.58% Spending on Non On-Water Trips Respondents who reported visiting their boats during a survey month but did not take them on the water were also asked how much they spent on a series of items. Category Mean Spending Equipment, maintenance, repairs $473.97 and upkeep Transient/guest dockage (marina $77.58 fee) Restaurant meals & drinks $61.38 Boat fuel and oil $34.36 Auto gas and oil $31.75 Groceries $17.93 Lodging (hotel/motel) $11.82 Recreation and entertainment $6.86 Shopping and souvenirs $6.71 Fishing gear, bait, ice, etc. $4.56 Pump out fees $0.06 Lodging (camping/b&b) $0.00 Total Spent: $726.98 Interstate Spending: Non On-Water Visits Those who reported visiting their boats during a survey month but did not take them on the water were asked to estimate what percent of the total spending they listed occurred in the state where the boats were located.

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 9 Spending in State Percent of Respondents 0% 6.48% 1%-10% 1.54% 11%-20% 0.62% 21%-30% 0.62% 31%-40% 0.62% 41%-50% 0.93% 51%-60% 0.31% 61%-70% 0.62% 71%-80% 3.09% 81%-90% 1.85% 91%-99% 2.16% 100% 81.17% General Annual Expenses The final survey contained an end of season component in which boaters were asked about general expenses of owning their vessel over the last 12 months. Expense Type Mean Spending Non trip-specific expenditures/other $2,024.65 items not listed below Dockage, mooring, storage $1,131.55 Boat loan payments $1,050.19 Routine vessel maintenance, $968.60 including parts and labor Repairs to existing vessel, including $970.53 parts and labor Boat insurance $520.97 Purchase of new equipment or $489.53 upgrades for the vessel, including parts and installation labor Taxes $166.40 Purchase of a new trailer $125.99 State registration, trailer registration $95.13 and/or USCG documentation fees Fishing-related expenses $92.07 Safety-related equipment $86.86 Total $7,722.47

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 10 Interstate Spending: General Annual Expenses Respondents to the end of season survey component were asked to estimate the percent of total spending in the categories above that occurred in the state where their boats were registered. Percent of Spending in State Percent of Respondents 0% 1.80% 1%-10% 1.80% 11%-20% 1.80% 21%-30% 0.36% 31%-40% 1.08% 41%-50% 1.44% 51%-60% 0.36% 61%-70% 1.44% 71%-80% 3.24% 81%-90% 7.55% 91%-99% 5.40% 100% 73.74% Hurricane Sandy Respondents were asked a few questions about the storm s impact on their boats. Those who said their boats were damaged summarized the severity. Boat Was Damaged Percentage Does not Apply 0.27% Yes 6.83% No 92.90% Damage Level Large Amounts of Damage 12% Moderate Amount of Damage 36% Small Amount of Damage 52% Percentage

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 11 BOATER BEHAVIOR In addition to the spending questions, the monthly surveys also contained questions pertaining to the frequency, duration and distances traveled for recreational boat trips. Monthly Boat Visits Respondents were asked how many total days during the month they visited their boats for recreation or maintenance. Delaware Maryland New Jersey Virginia May 5.37 5.36 4.6 3.38 4.84 June 6.75 6.74 6.13 4.17 6.16 July 6.65 6.11 6.4 4.33 6.16 August 5.93 5.24 6.25 5.41 5.89 September 5.91 3.61 5.14 3.72 5.03 October 5.63 3.97 3.72 3.63 4.4 Total 6.06 5.26 5.45 4.11 5.47 Combined Monthly On-Water Trips Respondents were asked how many days they took trips out on the water each month. Delaware Maryland New Jersey Virginia Combined May 4.52 4.234 4.1 3.46 4.23 June 5 4.58 5.4 3.49 4.88 July 4.91 5.71 5.58 3.53 5 August 5.09 4.55 5.59 4.06 5.05 September 4.85 5 4.67 3.1 4.53 October 3.61 4.47 4.25 3.5 3.91 Total 4.75 4.76 5.05 3.53 4.68

Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey 12 Overnight Trips Respondents were asked how many times per month they stayed on board their boats overnight. Delaware Maryland New Jersey Virginia May 2.53 0.24 0.83 1.21 1.56 June 2.51 0.66 0.99 0.3 1.45 July 2.52 0.25 1.33 0.25 1.5 August 2.2 0 1.68 0.82 1.58 September 2.25 0 1.03 0.58 1.37 October 2.37 0 0.55 0 1.13 Total 2.4 0.23 1.13 0.52 1.46 Combined Distance to Boat Respondents were asked approximately how many miles they traveled roundtrip to reach the place where they launched or boarded their boats. Total Delaware Maryland New Jersey Virginia Combined 63.51 41.41 51.72 65.62 57.25