Summary of the FSM Tuna FishenMPor SCTB^BRARY. IsecretariatofjhePaciHc^^ Total Catch ""

Similar documents
NFR-17. National Tuna Fishery Report Papua New Guinea. SCTB15 Working Paper. Ludwig Kumoru

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FIFTH REGULAR SESSION August 2009 Port Vila, Vanuatu

Marshall Islands National Tuna Fishery Report

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION August 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

NFR- Domestic Tuna Fisheries in the Solomon Islands. SCTB15 Working Paper. Eddie Oreihaka

PACIFIC TUNA TAGGING PROGRAMME MONTHLY TAGGING SUMMARY DECEMBER 2007

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

Taiwan Tuna Fisheries in the Western Pacific Ocean

SCTB15 Working Paper NFR 7. Fiji tuna and billfish fisheries. Jone Amoe. Fisheries Division, Ministry of Fisheries and Forests Fiji

Tuna Fisheries Report Papua New Guinea

Status of Albacore Fishing by Malaysian Tuna Longliners in the Southwest of Indian Ocean. Effarina Mohd Faizal, Sallehudin Jamon & Samsudin Basir

PART 1: INFORMATION ON FISHERIES RESEARCH AND STATISTICS SOLOMON ISLANDS

Overview of tuna fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, including economic conditions 2015 (WCPFC-SC /GN WP-1)

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOURTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Busan, Republic of Korea 8-16 August 2018

SCTB17 Working Paper SWG 5

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION August 2011 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

PACIFIC TUNA TAGGING PROGRAMME MONTHLY TAGGING SUMMARY NOVEMBER 2007

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION August 2010 Nuku alofa, Tonga

COMPARISON OF TUNA CATCH STATISTICS FOR THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN HELD BY FAO AND SPC

NFR 17. New Zealand Tuna Fisheries in 2002 and SCTB17 Working Paper. Terese Kendrick 1, Talbot Murray 2 and Susan Jane Baird 3

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ELEVENTH REGULAR SESSION. Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia 5-13 August 2015

Chile s 2013 CMM 1.01 Implementation Report

ANALYSIS OF LONGLINE CATCH PER VESSEL IN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Summary of U.S. fisheries statistics for highly migratory species in the central-western Pacific, Honolulu Laboratory, Hawaii

NFR-22. National Report: Update on tuna fisheries of Taiwan in the Pacific Region. SCTB15 Working Paper

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

COORDINATING WORKING PARTY ON FISHERY STATISTICS. Nineteenth Session. Noumea, New Caledonia, July 2001 AGENCY REPORT.

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ELEVENTH REGULAR SESSION. Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia 5-13 August 2015

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOURTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Busan, Republic of Korea 8-16 August 2018

Japan s report on Paragraph 13, CMM

Tuna Fisheries Report Papua New Guinea

IOTC 2013 WPB th Working Party on Billfish. La Réunion 18 th -22 nd September 2013

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Rarotonga, Cook Islands 9 17 August 2017

TROPICAL TUNAS CAUGH BY THE MALAGASY LONGLINERS IN 2012

The State of World Tuna. Professor Glenn Hurry Executive Director WCPFC Pohnpei FSM

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE EIGHTH REGULAR SESSION August 2012 Busan, Republic of Korea

WCPFC SC1 ST WP 4. Tim Lawson and Peter Williams. Oceanic Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community Noumea, New Caledonia

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION August 2010 Nuku alofa, Tonga

Economic Indicators Update. October 2010

Conversion Factors Estimated for Bigeye and Yellowfin Tunas Distributed in Surrounding Waters of Taiwan

Digitization and Discovery. An Acquaintance With Ancient Fishery Data

Agenda Item G.1.a Supplemental CDFW Report 2 September 2015

SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION. TWENTY-SECOND REGIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING ON FISHERIES (Noumea, New Caledonia, 6-10 August 1990)

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION August 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

Tuna Longline Fishery in the Indian Ocean by Thai Fleet during

The vertical and horizontal distribution of bigeye tuna (Thunnus( albacares) ) related to ocean structure

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE EIGHTH REGULAR SESSION August 2012 Busan, Republic of Korea

TECHNICAL AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION. 26 September 1 October 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

OVERVIEW OF THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN TUNA FISHERIES, Antony D. Lewis and Peter G. Williams

The Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean

NORTHERN COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION

Feleti P Teo WCPFC Executive Director

Fisheries Management Act The National Tuna Fishery Management Plan. Certified on : 02 FEB Gazetted on: 11 FEB 1999 (No.

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-08 TARGET SIZE FOR THE TUNA FLEET IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Tuna [211] 86587_p211_220.indd 86587_p211_220.indd /30/04 12/30/04 4:53:37 4:53:37 PM PM

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TWELFTH REGULAR SESSION. Bali, Indonesia 3-11 August 2016

Fishing Ground and Abundance Distribution of Kawakawa (Euthynnus affinis) by Purse Seiner Fisheries along the Andaman Sea Coast of Thailand, 2016

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

IOTC-2018-CoC15-CR10 [E] IOTC Compliance Report for: Japan Report produced on: 12/04/2018

The Catch of SBT by the Indonesian Longline Fishery Operating Out of Benoa, Bali in 2008

ASIA AND PACIFIC COMMISSION ON AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ELEVENTH REGULAR SESSION. Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia 5-13 August 2015

Neritic Tuna Catch, Species composition and monthly average landings in Sri Lankan Tuna Gillnet Fishery operate within EEZ

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Second Regular Session 7-18 August 2006 Manila, Philippines

Feleti P Teo Executive Director

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ELEVENTH REGULAR SESSION. Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia 5-13 August 2015

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

Estimates of large-scale purse seine and longline fishing capacity in the western and central Pacific based on stock assessments of target species

OCTOBER 2008 BLUEFIN TUNA SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND MARKET OF JAPAN

OVERVIEW OF TUNA FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN, INCLUDING ECONOMIC CONDITIONS 2004

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018

"Present status of Tropical tuna fisheries in Iran"

Majuro Based Transhipment Industry Study. FFA Report 92/23

SCTB16 Working Paper SWG 6

The fishery for jack mackerel in the Eastern Central Pacific by European trawlers in 2008 and 2009

CATCH AND EFFORT BY KOREAN FLAGGED FLEET

An Analysis of Fishing Capacity in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Tuna Fishery and Management Implications 1

PROPOSAL IATTC-92 B-4 REVISED SUBMITTED BY BELIZE, GUATEMALA, NICARAGUA, COSTA RICA AND PANAMA

IOTC Agreement Article X. Report of Implementation for the year 2016

Thai Tuna Longline Fishing in the Indian Ocean from 2000 to 2006

Fishery Subsidies: Japan

Samoa Tuna Fisheries Report 2005

Research Priorities of the SPC Oceanic Fisheries Programme. John Hampton Oceanic Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community

Maturity and Spawning of the Small Yellow Croaker, Larimichthys polyactis

31 Exports of Fishery Products

SC China s Annual report Part II: The Squid Jigging Fishery Gang Li, Xinjun Chen and Bilin Liu

NFR 8. Tuna fisheries in French Polynesia in SCTB16 Working Paper

China s Growing Tuna Fishing Fleet in the Pacific Ocean: A Samoan Fisheries Perspective

DOCUMENT SAC-06 INF-L

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Rarotonga, Cook Islands 9 17 August 2017

NATIONAL TUNA REPORT PHILLIPINES

Basis for regional structures used in the 2014 tropical tuna assessments, including regional weights

Draft. Hiroki Yokoi, Yasuko Semba, Keisuke Satoh, Tom Nishida

Transcription:

scr^s^ Summary of the FSM Tuna FishenMPor SCTB^BRARY IsecretariatofjhePaciHc^^ Total Catch "" The catch figures are as yet preliminary as the amount of catch return forms not yet included are unknown. Estimation of changes in accuracy of reporting is also not quantified. The preliminary estimate of the 1995 total catch of tuna reported in the FSM EEZ was 229,841 metric tonnes (MT), this represents a 9% increase on the 1994 catch. The contributions to tuna catch by gear-type was 85% purse seine and about 8% each for both longline and pole and line. The total annual catch of tuna of 1995 is 9% more than that of 1994, which is also 49% more than the average of the past 6 years reported catch. All gear types had a greater catch than the previous year; purse seine 4%, long line 1% and pole and line 288%. The pole and line fleet not only had the largest proportional increase in catch, it also had the largest actual increase in tonnage, an increase from 1994's catch of over 11, metric tonnes. Table 1, Catches of Tuna by Gear Type in the FSM EEZ from 1989-1995. Source: Vessel Catch reports 12193 BibUothcque CPS Year ParseSeihe -, >t ieongune " f*»bfeandline 1- Caf&flVIT} V fcatch carry, i^tcht<3mrr) 4 5> - tcatch{mto> * 1989 9,667 12,93 2,466 123,226 199 13,163 14,82 1,57 128,49 1991 18,268 9,956 23.379 141,63 1992 125,52 12.645 3,119 141,284 1993 157,514 14,842 6,549 178,95 1994 188,377 15,674 6,41 21,92 Average 128,918 13,338 11,677 153,933 1995 195,183,,"-/ 17.25&, V ; ' - 17,48- Sti. 229,84$ 1

Figure 1. FSM EEZ Total Catch by Gear Type for the period 1988-1994. Source: Catch Return forms, Tuna Database s.5 I 2, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, Purse Seine BLongline DPole and Line Year Fleet Structure The estimation of fleet sizes was done by examining the numbers of vessels fished during the calendar year. During 1995, 638 vessels fished in FSM waters. The composition of the fleet was 444 Longline vessels 151 single Purse seiners (plus 4 Korean seiner carriers) and 39 pole and line vessels. Purse Seine The most common flag of the 151 purse seiners fishing in the FSM EEZ, was the US fleet (3% of vessels). The U.S. fleet concentrated their efforts in the FSM EEZ more than in previous years. This was reflected in a much higher catch than in previous years by the U.S. fleet. The Taiwanese comprised 28% of the purse seiners; the Japanese vessels 22%; and the Korean vessels 14%. The rest of the rest of the purse seiners were made up of the FSM domestic fleet, Vanuatuan, Kiribati and Papua New Guinean vessels. An additional 4 Korean seiner carrier vessels received permits to tranship at FSM ports. 2

Figure 2. 199S Composition by flag of purse seine vessels fishing in FSM EEZ 14% N = 151 The activity or effort (days) through time of the different fleets was determined by the number of days recorded each month on the submitted catch return forms. The most effort was recorded by the Japanese, U.S. and Taiwanese vessels respectively. The U.S. fleet showed a greater presence in the FSM EEZ than in previous years, this was also reflected in their catches. Not all the purse seine fleets were active for the entire year. The Korean association, one of the larger fleets, was unable to come to an agreement with the MMA to renew their Agreement in 1995 and hence only fished for the first 2 months of 1995. 3

Figure 3. Purse seine activity (effort per month) among fleets fishing in FSM EEZ 6 5 4 3 io 2 :lt Jan March i I-- JU. May July Days Sept. Nov. Japan U.S. GB Taiwan D Korea FSM Vanuatu Kiribati PNG Longline The Chinese vessels made up the bulk of the Longline fleet (5%). These vessels plus the Japanese (3%) and the Taiwanese (16%) comprised almost all the fleet. The other 3% was composed of vessels from the US (Guam) and the domestic FSM fleet. Figure 4.1995 Composition by flag of purse seine vessels fishing in FSM EEZ CH 5% JP 3% FM 2% The Chinese flagged longliners also had the most trips in FSM waters, 3,48 followed by the Taiwanese fleet, 582; the Japanese vessels, 56; then the domestic fleet, 12; Guam based US fleet, 54 and the Koreans, 2. 4

The activity of the fleets was not uniform throughout the year. The Japanese effort was concentrated earlier than the Chinese. This may be a consequence to the Chinese observing their Chinese New Year period. Although, this pattern is not evident in the Taiwanese fleet. Figure 3. Longline activity (effort per month) among fleets fishing in FSM EEZ 199S Longline Activity in FSM EEZ Jan March May July Month Sept. Nov. Pole and Line The 41 Pole and line vessels with permits to fish in FSM waters last year were all Japanese. The activity of the vessels was principally in the first half of 1995. Figure 4. Activity of pole and line fleet in the FSM EEZ I Japan March May ~ I Month July Sept Nov. 5

Catch by Species/Gear Table 2. Total Catch of all species by gear and flag for FSM EEZ Source: Catch Return Forms; Tuna Database FTa& fitn* %' n(r w3 Japan 1,968 33 23 8,813 134 56 17,48 39 86 127,189 US 44,165 45 187 54 44,165 Taiwan 28,9 43 277 2,166 69 582 3,256 Korea 16,25 21 53 16,25 FSM 3,467 11 143 11 12 3.61 Vanuatu 1,135 1,135 Kiribati 1,38 1,38 PNG 7 7 China Total 6,133 224 348 195,183 149 749 17.255 444 478 17,48 39 86 6,133 229,846 Species Composition The submitted catch return reports indicate the FSM pelagic fishery comprised 71% skipjack, 25% yellowfin, 3% bigeye and 1% other species. However, catches of bigeye tuna were not reported by the purse seiners. Observer reports indicate that about 2% of the reported yellowfin catch is actually bigeye. Thus this would estimate the correct the purse seine bigeye tuna catch to have been 9,791 MT tuna and 39,163 MT of yellowfin. This correction would then make the total FSM EEZ catch for these species as estimated at 47,723 MT (21%) yellowfin and 16,592 MT (7%) bigeye. 6

Figure 5. Corrected species composition of the reported FSM tuna fishery catch by weight Yellowfin 21% N = 229,846 MT Skipjack 71% Purse Seine The catch among fleets for 1995 varied from 7 MT to about 1, MT of tuna. The order of catches corresponded to the order of effort for the fleets; from 18 to 4,15 days engaged in fishing in the FSM EEZ. There was a considerable range in overall CPUE among fleets from 3.9 MT/day for the PNG vessels to 46.7 MT/day for the Koreans. However, both these fleets spent relatively little time fishing in the FSM EEZ thus they are probably not representative of catch rates. The fleets that invested the most effort in the FSM EEZ (Japan, U.S. and Taiwan) were closer to an average of about 2 MT/day. Observer reports indicate the reported low purse seine catches of 'Other' species reflects the poor recording of by catch species. 7

Table 3. 1995 Catch by Species of the purse seine fishery in FSM EEZ Japan US Taiwan Korea FSM Vanuatu Kiribati PNG Total Day* 4,15 1,975 1,681 348 319 71 66 18 8,628 73,672 31,54 22,74 14,51 2,368 895 886 7 145,979 17.8 16 13.1 41.7 7.4 12.6 13.4 3.9 16.92 27,128 12,582 6,16 1,74 1,99 24 149 48,954 6.5 6.4 3.6 5 3.4 3.4 2.3 5.67 w% Other 168 8 3 251.3 MT Total '(CPUE 1,968 44,165 28,9 16,25 3,467 1,135 1,38 7 195,183 24.3 22.4 16.7 46.7 1.9 16 15.7 3.9 22.62 Longline The longline catches of target tuna by flag ranged from 123 MT to 5,388 MT. The effort range was from about 4, hooks by the domestic fleet to over 19, hooks set by the Chinese. The number of hooks set by the Chinese and Japanese fleets were relatively similar, despite the Chinese having almost twice as many vessels and having made nearly seven times the number of trips. This shows the difference between the two fleets in effort per vessel. The Japanese set more hooks per set and have trips of longer duration. The difference in the CPUE demonstrates also the difference in the fishing efficiency of the different gears. The Japanese had the highest overall CPUE as well as the highest CPUE for the target tunas. Table 4. 199S Catch by Species of the longline fishery in FSM EEZ 1 Flag 1 s oi hooks Yelk >wfiu MT CPUE MT B«l CPUE * Other *. MT * TO MX <> tal #M China 19,33 2,941.51 2,427.3 745 6,133.92 Japan 189,45 4,565.95 3,52.47 746 8,813 1.51 Taiwan 59,924 756.38 843.31 575 2,166.98 FSM 3,898 94.94 29.19 2 143 1.29 Total 443,17 8,356.2 6,81.2 2,86 17,255.4 8

Pole and Line The Japanese pole and line fleet tended to focus on the FSM EEZ in 1995. This is shown in the relatively high catches and effort compared to prior years. Table 5. Species Composition of the pole and line catch in FSM EEZ. 9

Disposal of Catch Longline The total amount offish that was offloaded (transhipped and reject) was 19% less for 1995 compared with that of 1994. The yellowfin offloaded was 34% greater than 1994 but bigeye offloadings were down 37% and billfish down 18%. The transhipped fish are immediately flown via Guam to markets in Japan and the reject fish are frozen and taken by Ting Hong on ships to Taiwan or are sold to the domestic processors. Table 6. - Summary for Longline Transhipment for Year 1995 Source: Port Sampling Data di l&«c. Fort r "* Tran No 46,374 37,334 171 12 83,891 Pohnpei 217 Wt* 1,638,71 1,746,18 8,74 691 3,394,123 Rej Tran No Wt No 17,174 3,561 1,953 1,964 24,652 544,549 14,912 98,733 74,42 858,596 33,55 18,99 768 53,227 Chuuk 825 Wt 1,51,323 874,37 36,91 1,962,54 Rej Tran No Wt No 13,441 1,522 4,845 3,93 23,738 392,342 63,89 229,878 79,714 765,23 17,927 1,353 28,28 Kosrae 779 Wt 617,246 469,673 1,86,919 Rej No Wt 7,558 1,24 3,43 3.458 15,83 247,751 44,96 198,62 91,827 581,736 Tran No 11,32 13,17 18 24,45 Yap 414 Wt 426,119 666,17 7,347 152 1,99,788 Rej No 2,741 864 699 1,16 5,41 Wt 96,741 41,56 37,471 38,224 213,942 ffltitf-.*? 5,14,7*1 T 4,45,711..y " 6\7$ t*21gft8l M* 8,8623 SM* *All weights are in Kilograms (kg). In 1995 Pohnpei had the greatest amount of longline caught tuna offloaded, followed by Chuuk. In 1994 Chuuk had had the premier position among ports. However, problems with the states' utilities and safety concerns caused the vessels to prefer Pohnpei for transhipment. 1

Figure 6. Transhipped and Rejected Longline Target Tuna by Port kg 3,5, 3,, 2,5, 2,, 1,5, 1,, 5, 1 h- i 1 L_( +.n^.. I r-i c 5. Pi J3 o a. 2 3 a! is u Port/Classification C Q. CO CO i5 >- <* >. Purse Seine There were 32% fewer purse seine transhipments in 1995 compared to 1994. Correspondingly there was a 33% decrease in the volume transhipped. The Korean purse seiners were without an agreement and did not fish for most of the year. There was also only 4 transhipments made after October in the port. 11

Table 7-1995 Purse Seine Transhipment Summary Source: MMA Cargo Manifest Form ' "*^>$Sh. sia l8ps 1 * Fr 1 SOte *J#* Total " No.o D veries < M Jan 18,977 2,126 1, 22,13 AU(3). KR(15), TW(35) Feb 22,833 4,12 26,935 AU(1),KR(24), TW(42), VU(1) J Mar 12,373 2,65 14,978 AU(1), FM(1), PG(2), TW(3) Apr 8,463 257 8,72 AU(1),PG(2),TW(11), VU(1) May 11,415 472 68 12,567 AU(1),TW(23) Jun 14,42 1,738 16,14 AU(1),FM(1), PG(1), TW(32) Jul 4,378 1,45 1,58 7,48 AU(3), TW(15), US(2), VU(1) Aug 5,61 3,92 4,182 13,685 FM(2), TW(24), US(12) Sep 7,812 4,195 4,116 16,123 PG(4),TW(31), US(8), VU(1) Oct 6,99 5,731 1,85 13,86 AU(2), TW(24), US(6) Nov 95 98 1,93 PG(1),TW(2), US(2), Dec NONE Total 114,194 27,558 12,643 154,395 369 Deliveries Average = 418.41 MT * All figures are in metric tonnes (MT). Observer Program In total, 49 observer trips were made in 1995. This is less than 1994 (58 trips), however the program was without a biologist for about half the year. The composition of the trips was intended to cover a representative sample of the trips being made in the FSM EEZ. The breakdown of the trips by gear was 49% longline, 43% purse seine (plus 2 trips on purse seine research vessels) and 4% pole and line. 12

Figure 7. Composition of Observer Trips by Gear Type PS LL 49% PL 4% N = 49 The breakdown of trips by flag covered all the major fleets. The majority of trips in order were made on Taiwanese vessels followed by Chinese then Japanese. Trips were also made on US and domestic vessels 13

Figure 8. Composition of observer trips by Flag Composition of Observer Trips by Flag Jr 21% N = 49 Yellowfin Tuna Reproductive Study The collection of gonads for the yellowfin tuna reproductive study was completed in April 1996. During 1995, 934 gonads were collected form longline pole and line and purse seine vessels by observers as a part of their routine duties. Onshore Developments No PS Transhipments since Nov 1995. Future Prospects Korean PS reentered an agreement Taiwan PS to come back to the table 14