Frog and Toad Survey 2014 By Jessica Kitchell, Andrew Badje, and Tara Bergeson

Similar documents
Frog and Toad Survey, 2000 By Brian Dhuey, and Bob Hay

Wisconsin Frog and Toad Survey

Summary of Volunteer Effort

SUMMARIZING FROG AND TOAD COUNT DATA

Lye Brook Amphibian Monitoring. Update. For the Vermont Monitoring Cooperative

Amphibian Monitoring on Mt. Mansfield, Underhill, Vermont

Mt. Mansfield Amphibian Monitoring. Update

HOP TO IT!! GUNFLINT TRAIL FROGS & TOADS

Amphibian Calling Survey Summary 2011

Amphibian Monitoring on Mt. Mansfield, Vermont

Amphibian Calling Survey Summary 2008

Goldfish Removal Millar s Pond. Resort Municipality of Whistler

Author: Abstract: Keywords: Introduction

Frogs of Anderson County, TN

Status and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois

Bear Lake. Final Results Portage County Lake Study. March 31, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Portage County Staff and Citizens

Information needs for resource management in and around Florida Bay

Northern Leopard Frog Recovery Program

Fishery Report 2017: Dissostichus spp. (Subarea 48.2)

r-r;- Jr"'- ~ /3 r q_-;; s C/Jf /-:64#.f 199tr /b: A REPORT ON THE OCCURRENCE OF THE WESTERN DIAMONDBACK RATTLESNAKE Crota1us atrox IN KANSAS

The Leopard Frogs of New Jersey

Matching respondents over time and assessing non-response bias. Respondents sometimes left age or sex blank (n=52 from 2001 or 2004 and n=39 from

A Survey and Discussion of the Geographical Range of. Anolis cristatellus. Travis Doggett

Environmental Change and its Effects

MINNESOTA GROUSE AND HARES, John Erb, Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group DNR, Grand Rapids, MN 55744

In each summer issue of Lake

Preliminary submission of information relevant to the status review of the thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) (NOAA-NMFS )

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

A Guide to Larval Amphibian Identification in the Field and Laboratory

Salamanders and Frogs!

Reading the River. Greetings from the President. In this Issue. Board of Directors

Ruffed Grouse Conservation Plan Executive Report

Monitoring Amur Leopards in Southwest Primorskii Krai, Russia

DEER AND ELK POPULATION STATUS AND HARVEST STRUCTURE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: A SUMMARY OF STATE AND PROVINCIAL STATUS SURVEYS.

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA Amendments to Appendices I and II of CITES

SCTB16 Working Paper FTWG 5

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology

Wildlife. Contest Details: The contest shall be divided into team and individual activities. The following is a breakdown of the scoring to be used.

West Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

United States Commercial Vertical Line Vessel Standardized Catch Rates of Red Grouper in the US South Atlantic,

COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2015 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 160

Studbook breeding program Cuora mccordi (McCord s box turtle)

Largemouth Bass in Northern Wisconsin: Factors Regulating Recruitment and Potential Dietary Interactions with Walleyes

Fall Wild Turkey Population Survey, 2010

WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISH MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES DELAVAN LAKE SPRING 2012

Sheepshead Fishery Overview South Atlantic State/Federal Management Board May 2014 Introduction Life History Landings

Survey of Calling Behavior of Orthoptera Species at Springfield, Dominica

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Rainy Lake Open-water Creel Survey:

The Ribbet Hypothesis

REPORT ON THE LYNX MONITORING TRAINING COURSE

A location model for pedestrian crossings in arterial streets

SPECIES FACT SHEET. Common Name: Siuslaw Sand Tiger Beetle or Siuslaw Hairy-necked Tiger Beetle

State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Causes of Tiger (Panthera tigris) Population Decline, and Potential Consequences if the Decline Continues

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

Political Interference in Endangered Species Science A Systemic Problem at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Kingfishes (whitings), Menticirrhus spp.

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

A Survey of Bone Lake s Frogs and Toads in 2012

Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Field Notes Summer 2010 Welcome

Conservation Worksheet III

The Ozark Hellbender: No longer found under the rocks. By: Justine M. Dover

Furbearer Management Newsletter

The Life History of Triturus v. vittatus (Urodela) in Various Habitats

4/2/2009. What exploitation is How amphibians are being exploited

Fig. 1 Regions of the continental U.S. and southern Canada included in the Christmas Bird Count (CBC). Points designate CBC survey locations.

Gizachew Tiruneh, Ph. D., Department of Political Science, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, Arkansas

Age and Winning in the Professional Golf Tours

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

The great obstacle is simply this: the conviction that we cannot change because we are dependent on what is wrong. But that is the addict s excuse,

A.23 RIVER LAMPREY (LAMPETRA

A Combined Recruitment Index for Demersal Juvenile Cod in NAFO Divisions 3K and 3L

Potential collision risks of large whales and fast ferries traveling between Korea and Japan

Wildlife Introduction

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

written and illustrated by Mrs. Shellenberger s First Graders

3. DYNAMICS OF GLOBAL CLIMATIC INDICES AND MAIN COMMERCIAL CATCHES

2018 South Carolina FFA Association State Wildlife Contest

2015 Forest Grouse Parts Collection Summary

Beaver Trapping Questionnaire By Brian Dhuey and John Olson

Western Great Lakes Region FAN UPDATE

2014 Forest Grouse Parts Collection Summary

Alberta Conservation Association 2013/14 Project Summary Report

LOGAN MARTIN RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT REPORT. Prepared by. E. Daniel Catchings District Fisheries Supervisor

ELECTRO-FISHING REPORT 2016 UPPER TWEED

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

Fig. 3.1 shows the distribution of roe deer in the UK in 1972 and It also shows the location of the sites that were studied in 2007.

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

How does war affect gorillas?

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Summary of 2012 DNR and Partners Fisheries Surveys in St. Clair/Lake Erie and Fishery Forecast for 2013

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation. for

3.3: Time Series and Index Numbers

Free fish and invertebrate ID classes gets SCUBA divers involved in marine conservation

Transcription:

Frog and Toad Survey 2014 By Jessica Kitchell, Andrew Badje, and Tara Bergeson Abstract Survey sites with American bullfrog, boreal chorus frog, Cope s gray treefrog, gray treefrog, green frog, northern cricket frog, spring peeper, and wood frog were above their long-term averages. Of the twelve Wisconsin anuran species, seven showed an increase in percent occurrence in 2014 from the 2013 levels. The number of frog survey routes that were run increased from 96 in 2013 to 130 in 2014. This number falls short of our goal of two routes per county. Introduction The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) has coordinated a volunteer frog and toad survey since 1984. The survey arose from concerns about declines in populations of some frog species and was endorsed and expanded by the WDNR Surveys committee in 1990. Wisconsin has twelve anuran species. One species (Blanchard s cricket frog) is endangered and four species (American bullfrog, mink frog, northern leopard frog, and pickerel frog) are included on the Natural Heritage working list as "special concern". In general, anurans are considered to be good indicator species for the habitats where they are found. In 2008, the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles changed the naming convention of five species; bullfrog to American bullfrog, Blanchard s cricket frog to northern cricket frog, eastern American toad to American toad, eastern gray treefrog to gray treefrog, and northern spring pepper to spring peeper. Recent genetic sampling in cricket frogs of the genus Acris documents the Blanchard s cricket frog (Acris blanchardi) as a distinct and separate species and not a subspecies of the northern cricket frog (Acris crepitans) (Gamble et al. 2008). Methods Survey routes are distributed statewide, with a goal of two survey routes in each county of Wisconsin. Survey routes consist of 10 sites which are monitored three times yearly, in 2014 the surveys periods were 8-30 April for the southern half of the state and 8 April to May 7 th for the northern half of the state. This being so, because the northern half was delayed by the onset of spring. The other survey periods stayed the same. For instance the 2 nd period was still 20 May through 5 June, and the 3 rd was 1-15 July. Surveys are started at dusk on evenings with wind velocities of less than eight miles per hour. Water temperature is recorded at each stop where possible. The occurrence of each frog species is determined at each site by presence or absence of their call. The abundance of each species is ranked by the relative number of calling individuals. Stops with species calling in which individuals can be counted and there is no overlap in calls has an abundance rank of 1. When calls of individuals can be distinguished but there is some overlapping of calls the abundance rank is 2. When calls are constant, continuous and overlapping (full chorus), the abundance rank is 3. Percent occurrence is determined for each species specific geographic range and peak calling periods. Survey data are analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS). The calling index for each species was summed to provide an index to the route population each year. These route populations are regressed on time to create a species population trend.

Results The number of survey routes increased from 96 in 2013 to 130 in 2014. Observers increased from 93 in 2013 to 132 in 2014 (Fig. 1). The number of routes run in each county is still below our goal of two per county (Fig. 2). Of the 12 anuran species, seven showed an increase in percent occurrence in 2014 from 2013 levels. These were the American toad, boreal chorus frog, Cope s gray treefrog, gray treefrog, mink frog, northern cricket frog, and pickerel frog (Fig. 3). The northern leopard frog was below its previous year s occurrence levels and long-term mean. Population trends, based on the call index, for each anuran species can be reviewed in Figure 3. Literature Cited Gamble, T., P.B. Berendzen, H.B. Shaffer, D.E. Starkey, and A.M. Simons. 2008. Species limits and phylogeography of North American cricket frogs (Acris: Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48:112 125.

Figure 1. The numbers of observers and frog routes completed, 1984-2014. Figure 2. The number of frog survey routes run in each county in 2014.

Figure 3. Percent occurrence and abundance of the 12 anuran species in Wisconsin, 1984-2014.