Joint Plan for Orderly Annexation of Gainesville s Urban Reserve Area

Similar documents
City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Feasibility Study to Assess the Viability of Developing Shared Indoor Pool/Aquatic Facility

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

Parks & Recreation Department. Date to Committee: November 14, 2012 Date to Council: November 26, 2012

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Athletic Field Use & Demand Analysis Study

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Fishing License Renewals and Angler Lifestyles 2015 Angler Participation Research Summary Report

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

EVAN GLASS. Montgomery County Council District 5

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Population & Demographics

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

The Atlanta BeltLine. Quarterly Briefing December @atlantabeltline. Eastside Trail Southern Extension

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

Student Population Projections By Residence. School Year 2016/2017 Report Projections 2017/ /27. Prepared by:

GIS for Public Opinion / Survey Research. Timothy Michalowski Senior Statistical GIS Analyst Abt SRBI - New York, NY

Analyzing Gainesville s Bicycle Infrastructure

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

AFL Masters WA (Incorporated) Governance Policy

The North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy and Western Richmond Terrace 1 : The Forgotten Corridor

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan Update

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented By: The Inavero Institute September 8, 2009

PROJECT OVERVIEW. Auburn Station Access Improvements Project

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Planning for tennis in your Local Government Area. A resource from Tennis Australia

NASHUA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Travel Behavior of Baby Boomers in Suburban Age Restricted Communities

STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

Health Impact Analysis for Integrated Regional Land Use and Transportation Plan

7 Ciphers Segmentation Cracking The Code On The Urban Market >>

University Park, Texas

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

MTA Surveys: Facts and Findings. NYMTC Brown Bag March 12, 2014 Julia Seltzer, MTA Planning

PROJECT OVERVIEW. Auburn Station Access Improvements Project

2016 National Post-Election Study

Community Transportation Plan

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Urban Environmental Climate Maps for Urban Planning Considering Urban Heat Island Mitigation in Hiroshima

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Pedestrian Activity Criteria. PSAC March 8, 2011

4 Ridership Growth Study

Overview: Phase 3 Draft Development and Circulation Plans, White Bear Station

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

Building Community Partnerships for Mobility:

Light Rail Proposal. June 13, 2016 Presentation for the Joint Sustainability Committee by the Central Austin Community Development Corporation

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

Mobility Plan Status Report 2012 Average Annual Daily Traffic

CORPORATE SPONSORSHIP INFORMATION

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

The Walkability Indicator. The Walkability Indicator: A Case Study of the City of Boulder, CO. College of Architecture and Planning

Accessibility, mobility and social exclusion

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

Walkable Retail: When Old Becomes New Again Part 1

Update on Bicycle Helmet Ordinance. Presented to the Quality of Life & Environment Committee May 12, 2014

OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY

Scope of Services BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MPO

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Non-motorized Transportation Planning Resource Book Mayor s Task Force on Walking and Bicycling City of Lansing, Michigan Spring 2007 pg.

WEST CENTRAL DRAFT DISTRICT PLAN SUBMISSION 3 HASSAL ST WESTMEAD

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY:

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

THESE DAYS IT S HARD TO MISS the story that Americans spend

MIDCOAST MAINE TRANSIT STUDY. In Association with: MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS

County Donegal Public Participation Network Work Plan

Walkable Communities and Adolescent Weight

Built Environment and Older Adults: Supporting Smooth Transitions Across the Life- Span. Dr. Lawrence Frank, Professor and Bombardier UBC

Regional Bicycle System Master Study. Preliminary Results Update

North Central Texas Council of Governments

Smart Growth: Residents Social and Psychological Benefits, Costs and Design Barbara Brown

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard City Council Study Session Summary

OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION

Application of Demographic Analysis to Pedestrian Safety. Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida

SARASOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT Parks and Recreation

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

Making Phoenix Streets Complete. City of Phoenix Complete Streets Initiative

Arapahoe Square Zoning + Design Standards & Guidelines Task Force Meeting 9 January 27, 2016

John H. Furbee Aquatics Center Operations Study

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

March 6, 2013 Tony Giarrusso, Rama Sivakumar Center for GIS, Georgia Institute of Technology

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

THE PHILADELPHIA COMPLETE. an overview

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

Transcription:

Legislative File #: 080404 ORDERLY ANNEXATION TEAM Joint Plan for Orderly Annexation of Gainesville s Urban Reserve Area September 29 th, 2008

ORDERLY ANNEXATION TEAM Presentation Overview I. Background II. Lifestyle Segmentation Profiles III. Plan for Orderly Annexations

Background Schedule for Development of a Plan for Orderly Annexations June 2007 Appointment of an Interlocal Team by both Managers Goal Setting and Development of a Team Charter Team Orientation to the Annexation Process Discussion and development of plan concept alternatives Development of collaborative work elements for City and County Development of Annexation Plan for Approval by City and County Today

Identification of Potential Annexation Sub-Areas 14 Sub-areas Identified

Previous Action taken by the Joint Commission March 18, 2008 The City Commission & County Commission: endorsed the 14 identified sub-areas for further evaluation; authorized the implementation of the survey, and approved extension of the required timeframe for completion of the Final Proposed Annexation Plan to September, 2008.

Appropriation of Funding for Proposed Survey Funding was not appropriated by the City Commission or the County Commission to perform the surveys. Alternative mechanisms were proposed to better understand the needs of residents living in the 14 sub-areas identified by the team.

Alternative Methodology Use Lifestyle Segmentation Profiles to: 1. Define the voting population in desired subareas. 2. Examine ballots cast in previous annexation votes and related issues. 3. Target areas in which to pursue annexation.

What are LSPs? The Community Tapestry segmentation system provides an accurate, detailed description of U.S. neighborhoods. Areas are divided into 65 segments based on demographic variables such as age, income, home value, occupation, household type, education, and other consumer behavior characteristics.

What are LSPs? Segmentation systems operate on the theory that people with similar tastes, lifestyles, and behaviors seek others with the same tastes hence the adage "like seeks like. People are segmented by their propensity to consume: Is a household more likely to spend money on books or tennis shoes?

What are LSPs? Example: L4 - Solo Acts Singles who prefer city life, many are young, startup households Well-educated, working professionals either attending college or holding a degree Income ranges from a low median of $40,400 to approximately $91,000

Alachua County

Desired Sub-Areas

Voting Precincts

Area 5-4

A Closer Look at Area 5-4 L6 Scholars and Patriots Butler Plaza Annexed

L6 - Scholars and Patriots The Scholars and Patriots group is characterized by youth, lower incomes, and either college life or military service. Few own homes due to their lifestage. Most residents are students pursuing college degrees who work part-time and low-paying jobs to support themselves. Scholars and Patriots participate in sports activities. They are style conscious and well connected with PC s, cell phones, and MP3 s and are beginning to acquire household furnishings.

Tapestry Output Precinct 36

Tapestry Output Precinct 36

Tapestry Output Precinct 36

Tapestry Output Precinct 36

Tapestry Output Precinct 36

The Plan A Closer Look at Sub Area 5-4 Obtain student records, cross check with voters registered in Area 5-4 Geocode students permanent addresses to identify parent LSPs Identify the parents, hopefully, identify the students.

Progress A Closer Look at Sub Area 5-4 Current student records have not yet been received from UF Registrar Used student records from 2005 to approximate the demography of current population in the following pivot tables

A Closer Look at Sub Area 5-4 Here we see the cumulative percentage of population by LSP Who are their parents?

L1 - High Society Sophisticated Squires, Suburban Splendor, Boomburbs, Exurbanites and Connoisseurs all are classified as High Society (L1) Who are their parents?

L1 - High Society Residents segmented as High Society are affluent and well educated. They represent 12% of U.S. households, but generate 25% of the total U.S. income. Median household income is $97,400, almost twice the national median.

L1 - High Society Married couple families with median home value of $346,400. One of the least diverse groups, it is one of the fastest growing, increasing at 2% annually. Residents are financially, civically and physically active. They participate in a wide variety of public activities and sports, and they travel extensively.

Summary The demography of an area does not change significantly over a 3 year period. This study will be repeated with current data.

Future Directions Obtain list of Super-voters from the Supervisor of Elections Office. Map and classify sub-areas by Supervoter density.

Future Directions 10,817 4,961 0 13,681 2,019 9,945 2,184 9,073 20,969 10,961 6,193 10,881

Uses of LSP Data Results can be used to: Develop Outreach Clearly define the voting population Match target areas with benefits Understand issues

Plan for Orderly Annexations Conduct one annexation referendum per year over the next five years. Use lifestyle segmentation approach to identify the best area to annex at that time. Conduct the annexation referendum in a different zone each year.

Annexation Referendum # 1 Plan for Orderly Annexations Zone 5 SW 20th Avenue # 1 2 3 4 5 Area Area 5-4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 Target Dates November 4, 2008 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Annexation Referendum # 2 Plan for Orderly Annexations # Area Target Dates Zone 1 Brittany Estates Zone 2 Eastside Area Kincaid Hills Area SE 441 1 2 3 4 5 Area 5-4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 November 4, 2008 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Annexation Referendum # 3 Plan for Orderly Annexations # Area Target Dates Zone 3 53 rd Avenue 39 th Avenue Rustlewood Zone 4 NW 43 rd Avenue Newberry Rd. N Tower Rd. East 1 2 3 4 5 Area 5-4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 November 4, 2008 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Annexation Referendum # 4 Plan for Orderly Annexations # Area Target Dates Zone 1 Brittany Estates Zone 2 Eastside Area Kincaid Hills Area SE 441 1 2 3 4 5 Area 5-4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 November 4, 2008 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Annexation Referendum # 5 Plan for Orderly Annexations # Area Target Dates Zone 3 53 rd Avenue 39 th Avenue Rustlewood Zone 4 NW 43 rd Avenue Newberry Rd. N Tower Rd. East 1 2 3 4 5 Area 5-4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 zone 1 or 2 zone 3 or 4 November 4, 2008 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Summary 1. Conduct five referendums over the next five years in a balanced geographic pattern. 2. Work collaboratively using methods such as Lifestyle Segmentation Profiles to ensure success. 3. Continue effective strategies to mitigate service delivery impacts.

Recommended Action City Commission & County Commission: Adopt the proposed plan to conduct one annexation referendum per year over the next five years, balanced geographically across each of the five zones of Gainesville s Urban Reserve Area ; and Extend the Annexation Transition Agreement (ATA) to 2013.