The Heber-Reno Domestic Sheep Driveway and Management of Bighorn Sheep in Arizona.

Similar documents
Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Final Review of New Information Appendix E AMPs-Sheep Allotments in Gravelly Mountains. c,llorttarta 'Fisft, MADISON RANGER DISTRICT.

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Background. Kofa NWR historically had large numbers of desert bighorn average about 800 individuals

BRENT N. LONNER, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, Fish & Wildlife Division, PO Box 488, Fairfield, MT 59436, USA

WILDLIFE HERITAGE TRUST ACCOUNT PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM

FINAL Drought Monitoring 2013 WildHorseEducation.org

If you would like to receive project updates as they are published please send your address to

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Frequently Asked Questions Reintroduction of Bison to Banff National Park

The Lesson of the Kaibab

Research Status. Management Problems

Overview Life history Distribution Management

Utah. North Stansbury Mountains Wilderness Study Area Site-Specific Monitoring Guide

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

2012 Diamond Complex Assessment BLM administered: Battle Mountain, Ely, Elko districts

RE: Development of an Environmental Assessment for a mountain lion management plan on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona

submitted: fall 2009

Status Of Oregon Rocky Mountain Goats

BIGHORN SHEEP IN IDAHO

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

COUNTY ADVISORY BOARD TO MANAGE WILDLIFE 2019 BIG GAME SEASONS RECOMMENDATIONS

Sheep Producers Are Challenged By Enviros Over Bighorn Issue

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Black Bear Quota Recommendations CR 17-13

Splitting seasons into multiple, shorter ones is preferable to long, crowded seasons.

Biology B / Sanderson!

Status of Bighorn Sheep in California, 2011

Case 1:17-cv CWD Document 7 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 12

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

Title of the Selection Desert Bighorn Sheep in Texas Teaching Band Grades 3-5 Genre: Nonfiction Informational, Magazine Article

December 26, Domestic Sheep grazing on a permitted allotment in the Gravelly Mountains

SPECIAL AUCTION AND RAFFLE TAGS

Attachment 2 SPECIAL AUCTION AND RAFFLE TAGS

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

Wilderness Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Sinbad Wild Burro Gather Utah (Day 1)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District

Mining & Petroleum Focus Group Southern Rocky Mountain Management Plan. Synopsis of Focus Group Key Issues

Subject to sale, withdrawal, or error.

Travel~anagement. Tonto National Forest Arizona Game and Fish Department Report ::: ;:::: _

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Photo by Mark Hebblewhite

Native Species Restoration and its Impact on Local Populations

NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT FOR THE SAIGA ANTELOPE MOU AND ACTION PLAN

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

R E S T O R AT I O N A N D M A N AG E M E N T OF D E S E RT

Arizona Statewide Elk Management Plan

Final Review of New Information Appendix D AMPs-Sheep Allotments in Gravelly Mountains

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

Arizona Statewide Elk Management Plan

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

APPENDIX A. Population characteristics, movements, and disease surveillance in the Palisades mountain goat herd, Wyoming 2015.

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990 (wildlife guidelines)

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

Exotic Wildlife Association Membership Alert

DRAFT Environmental Assessment for Limiting Mountain Lion Predation on Desert Bighorn Sheep on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

JC Mesa Ranch. Colorado - San Miguel County - Telluride

Early History, Prehistory

Cross F & Diamond Ranches Sunflower, Maricopa County, AZ

DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Operations Division 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Ste. 120 Reno, Nevada (775) Fax (775)

placed on the market.

The Advisory Committee is comprised of the following members and their respective affiliations:

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Operations Division 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Ste. 120 Reno, Nevada (775) Fax (775)

Lesson Two. The Horses We All Own - The Wild Horse & Burro Program. Lessons about the Unwanted Horse. Teacher Guide and Resources: Goals

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

Engineering Report: Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests. Black Mesa Ranger District. Analysis of. National Forest System Roads (NFSRs) #s 504 & 169

Attachment 6. Public Correspondence. Public correspondence received as of July 2, 2008

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE AND HUNTING SEASONS

WORKING WITH COMMUNITIES AND INTEREST GROUPS

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

NEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector

Iroquoia Heights Conservation Area White-tailed Deer Management Strategy

Bison Conservation in Canada

Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Proposal

Note Taking Sheet for Pass-Around Cards

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

Ely, Nevada Highway Commercial Office/Warehouse/Industrial Property

Bighorn Sheep, Mule Deer and The Central Arizona Project

Science Skills Station

Deer and Bison Artiodactyla

Bison: National Treasure or Pernicious Vector?

All Graduate Plan B and other Reports

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Limiting Mountain Lion Predation on Desert Bighorn Sheep on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge

Wildlife Introduction

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

Short briefing Abjatta shall Lakes national parks

CWD 102 for Managers. Chronic Wasting Disease - the beginnings Colorado Univ. of Wyoming

Transcription:

The Heber-Reno Domestic Sheep Driveway and Management of Bighorn Sheep in Arizona.

The driveway occurs on 60 miles of the Apache Sitgreaves National Forest and 80 miles of the Tonto National Forest. The lower eight miles run through bighorn sheep habitat.

Use would occur two times per year, spring and late summer. Total travel time would not exceed 57 days, normally 31 days in the spring and 26 days in the fall.

History of Bighorn Sheep Declines : Bighorn populations in Arizona apparently began to decline as early as the 1860 s. We can only conjecture about the reason for the severe declines of bighorn. However, the role of livestock and disease is likely to have been a key reason. Homesteaders from the Castle Hot Springs area stated that the area s bighorn sheep began to disappear shortly after the first domestic sheep were introduced around 1879. By the early 1900 s bighorn persisted only in some of the desert mountain ranges of the southwestern portion of Arizona and in portions of the Grand Canyon.

Heber Reno Sheep Driveway History In 1898 Woodrow Wilson created a proclamation allowing for domestic sheep driveways in specifically designated areas but the proclamation did not give any rights on USFS lands. The actual record of the Heber-Reno Domestic Sheep Driveway establishment in Arizona has not been located but the Tonto and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests have references to the Forester's marking of the boundaries of the Driveway in 1908. This route was used by as many as 400,000 sheep, twice a year in the early part of the 20th century. Driveways in the West were established in the 1890 s, and formalized by law and Executive Order by 1916.

Unit 22 Desert Bighorn Sheep Reintroduction In 1982, the Arizona Game and Fish Department released desert bighorn sheep in an area that was at that time thought to be far enough east of the Driveway as not to facilitate the mixing of domestic sheep and wild sheep. As the herd expanded to the west they occupied the habitat that is adjacent to the Driveway.

Current Facts of the Driveway Approximately 8,000 permitted sheep are authorized on the Heber-Reno Sheep Driveway. Two to four 2,000-sheep bands are authorized to cross the southern boundary of the Tonto NF in the Usery Pass area located on the Mesa RD. The Usery Pass and the Blue Point bedding grounds are separated from bighorn sheep habitat by 1.0 and 0.34 miles, respectively. The Usery Pass bedding ground is separated from bighorn sheep habitat by flat ground and the Blue Point bedding ground is separated from bighorn sheep habitat by the Salt River.

What's at stake Unit 22 Desert bighorn sheep population Unit 24B Desert bighorn sheep population Establishment of new Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep herds Desert Bighorn Sheep transplant stock Desert Bighorn Sheep viewing opportunities adjacent to major urban population Valley of the Sun

Serge W. Wright Unit 22 190 2010

Transplant to Goldfield Mountains Desert Bighorns

Unit 23 Hells Gate Wilderness Rocky Mountain bighorns

More Background on Unit 22 Survey Data: During 1980 and 1981 30 desert bighorn sheep were released near Goat Mountain in Unit 22. The first bighorn sheep hunt permit was issued in this unit by 1986. Survey Total October 1994-116 observed, population estimate +200 (population peak) July 1995-12 desert bighorn sheep transplanted from Unit 22 to Unit 24B Survey Total October 1995-66 observed, population estimate +104 (beginning of Population decline) Survey Total October 1997-30 observed, population estimate 47 (population low)

The Department conducted research on the bighorn sheep in the southern portion of Unit 22. One hope for the research was to try to determine, after the fact, the cause of the decline in the mid 1990s. The research, results and conclusions were based on the parameters of the population at the time of the research, which was conducted from 2000-2003. To complicate the research effort even more, from April 2001 to 2003 use of the sheep driveway in the area was curtailed by the Forest Service due to drought and insufficient forage for sheep.

Disease was suspected for the decline of the population, but no clinical symptoms of disease (other than contagious ecthyma) were ever observed during 2000-2003. Other evidence of exposure to disease agents was not found. The report hypothesizes that nutritional status and mountain lion predation were the biggest factors in the bighorn sheep population during the study period (McKinney et al 2005).

Time line of Environmental Assessment of the Driveway: 2004 Conservation groups settlement stipulates that the Forest Service analyze environmental impacts of the Heber-Reno domestic sheep "driveway" on the Tonto National Forest's bighorn sheep population. Prior to this lawsuit an Environmental Assessment for the driveway was on indefinite hold. 2007 ID Team established by the USFS and a Risk Assessment Team established with our Department as the lead.

Unit 22 and the Risk Assessment: The question was asked why AGFD reintroduced sheep in this area in the 1980 s knowing that the Driveway existed. The Department released the sheep in an area that was at that time thought to be far enough east of the Driveway as not to facilitate the mixing of domestic sheep and wild sheep. As the herd expanded to the west they occupied the habitat that is adjacent to the Driveway.

The conclusions and recommendations of this Workgroup are only designed to assist with the NEPA process and include assumptions that have not been quantitatively substantiated. The following are the items that received the most votes and are recommendations by the Workgroup: 1. Aerial surveys of wild sheep locations prior to domestic sheep entering the Driveway and the use of volunteers to haze wild sheep and locate domestic sheep strays should reduce risk. 2. An AGFD policy for removal and management of wild sheep that have come in contact with domestic sheep is needed. 3. Sustained compensation for permittees for use of pastures in lieu of the Driveway, trucking domestic sheep around wild sheep habitat, truncating the Driveway around wild sheep habitat, or elimination of Driveway will reduce risk of Pasteurella/Mannheimia-type pneumonic disease.

Furthermore, the Workgroup makes the following conclusions: 1. The Driveway in its entirety represents very low to low risk of nose-to-nose contact between domestic sheep and wild sheep. 2. The Mesa Ranger District subsection of the Forest represents the highest risk for nose-to-nose contact between domestic sheep and wild sheep and was rated as low risk.

Environmental Assessment for Heber-Reno/Morgan Mountain Sheep Driveways Tonto and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests April 2010

2010 Legal notice for the preliminary Environmental Assessment published Alternative 1 No Action no authorization of driveway Alternative 2 The Proposed Action no change Alternative 3 Partial Use remove portion that lies within bighorn sheep habitat

February 18, 2011 Decision Notice and final finding of no significant impact for the Heber-Reno and Morgan Mountain Sheep Driveway project Alternative 2, business as usual.

Although bighorn sheep are known to disperse between mountain ranges through flat areas, bighorn sheep generally prefer rugged topography to escape predators. The Usery Pass and the Blue Point bedding grounds are separated from bighorn sheep habitat by 1.0 and 0.34 miles, respectively, of flat ground.

In addition, the Blue Point bedding ground is separated from bighorn sheep habitat by the Salt River.

April 5, 2011 deadline to appeal decision AGFD written response for Alterative 3

Uncertain Future