Chautauqua Lake Macrophyte Management Strategy Final Draft April 2016

Similar documents
Update on Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force

Black Sturgeon Regional Plan

Quarterly Progress Meeting - May Brook Trout Outcome. Stephen Faulkner, USGS Brook Trout Action Team Lead

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROJECT

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

Analysis Data Sources

Restoring the Kootenai: A Tribal Approach to Restoration of a Large River in Idaho

GULF ANGLER FOCUS GROUP INITIATIVE PROCESS OVERVIEW AND PHASES SUMMARY

CHAPTER 4 DESIRED OUTCOMES: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Coastal and marine recreation in New England is ingrained in the region s economic and

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft Freshwater Fisheries Management Plan on behalf of Victoria s recreational fishing sector.

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

NOTICE: This publication is available at:

Aquatic Plant Management and Importance to Sport Fisheries

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

THE WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE PLAN FOR STRATEGIC ACTIONS November GOALS, OBJECTIVES, and KEY STRATEGIC ACTIONS

The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank

[FWS R1 ES 2015 N076; FXES FF01E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Draft Recovery Plan for

Kerr Lake Vegetation Survey. October November Report submitted by NC State University. Background

NEWS RELEASE. Lake Tahoe experts share research and aquatic invasive species control programs on second visit to Lake George.

Three point plan to addressing land use and habitat loss impacts on Chesapeake Bay tidal fish and shellfish

Eastern Shore Islands Area of Interest Community Newsletter

FWCP External Projects Delivered by Stakeholders and First Nations

SECTION 41 Table of Contents

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Orange County MPA Watch M o n i t o r i n g H u m a n U s a g e

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Recovery Plan for the. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the

Case Study 3. Case Study 3: Cebu Island, Philippines MPA Network 10

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan. 05 Policy Topic: Piers- Fish Habitat, Design, and Scenic Issues

Stakeholder Communication and Public Involvement Plan

Funding Habitat Restoration Projects for Salmon Recovery in the Snake River Region SRFB Grant Round Version: 2/19/16

Environmental Review and Permitting for Wild Trout

2016 Brook Trout Survey Project Remote Ponds and Coastal Streams Volunteer Angler Survey Results Report to Public

Overview Open Space and Recreation

Marine Debris from Land to Sea: Holistic Characterization, Reduction and Education Efforts in New Hampshire

1.Warm Springs Creek (Anaconda) Watershed Description and Land Use

Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary Program for Golf Courses. Place Alternating Slideshow Photo Here

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: Inland Fisheries - Hatchery Management

Cook Inlet Habitat Conservation Strategy

A Comparison of Western Watershed Councils. Presentation Prepared by Jeff Salt, Great Salt Lakekeeper

Some Steps Towards Climate-Ready Management of U.S. Fisheries

Refined Designated Uses for the Chesapeake Bay and Tidal Tributaries

Wild Virginia and Heartwood first raised this issue at the May 19, 2014 public meeting.

Starry Stonewort in Silver Lake Washington County, WI BRAD STECKART AIS COORDINATOR FOR WASHINGTON AND WAUKESHA COUNTIES

Coastal Wetlands Protection Act. Fisheries Management, Marine Sanctuaries and Closures

PROJECT BACKGROUND/DESCRIPTION

Advancing the Gulf of Mexico Shellfish Initiative (GoMexSI)

September 4, Update on Columbia basin Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Planning

A. PURPOSE B. BACKGROUND

Life History Study of the Alligator Gar in the Ouachita River, Arkansas


LIONFISH CONTROL PLAN

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Native American Crosscut Funding

Project Webpage:

Orange County MPA Watch Program Quarterly Report (Jan 1 March 31, 2012)

Integrated Pest Management Program Final Report

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS

Lake Texoma Advisory Committee

Brook Trout in Massachusetts: A Troubled History, A Hopeful Future

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

WELCOME Asian Carp Management and Control in the Ohio River and Upper Mississippi River Basins

INLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY Spring 2008

Table xxx: Listed and Suspected Impairments for Willow Creek 2010 Reach Impairment Pollutant Impaired Uses

Upper Iroquois River atershed Management Plan

IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA. Strategic Plan

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

Loughs Agency Freshwater Fisheries Monitoring Programme

Restoration Project at Trout Run Nature Preserve

BASS LAKE PLANNING UNIT Willow Creek Watershed

LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM UPDATE

The approach of CanoeKayak BC Whitewater (CKBC-WW) to River Access issues is driven by the organizational Mission Statement:

3.10 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan 05 Policy Topic: Piers- Fish Habitat, Design, and Scenic Issues

NEWS RELEASE. Fall Treatments on Lake George Tackle Invasive Asian Clams at Norowal Marina, Middleworth Bay, and Lake George Village

FACT SHEET MCGREGOR LAKE RESTORATION HABITAT PROJECT POOL 10, UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Preserving Biological Diversity for Future Generations

Orange County MARINE PROTECTED AREAS 2 nd Quarter 2016 Report

Employing Geographical Information Systems in Fisheries Management in the Mekong River: a case study of Lao PDR Kaviphone Phouthavongs

Proposed Shuswap River Boating Regulations Open House

POLITICS A MONUMENTAL TASK FOR STREAM RESTORATION: AN EXAMPLE FROM TRAPPER CREEK OREGON

Fighting Milfoil at Lake Louise

Integrated Pest Management: Application in the Sea Lamprey Control Program

Caloosahatchee River Citizen s Association

Western native Trout Status report

2016 Annual Work Plan

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Cates Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Mud Bay SLELO-PRISM Water Chestnut & Hydrilla Surveillance 2012

APPENDIX 2.1 Lake Sturgeon - Mitigation and Enhancement

Corps Plays Vital Role in Protecting Pacific Reefs

Site Tour, August 24, Fish Science - Big Lake Coho Salmon Migration and Habitat Use

STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS

Cat Island Chain Restoration

CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL The River Connects Us

Estimated on-the-ground start and end dates: 1 June October 2018

MISSISSIPPI MAKEOVER A Plan for Restoration, Just Around the Bend

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Transcription:

Chautauqua Lake Macrophyte Management Strategy Final Draft

Executive Summary... i Acknowledgments... iii Key Acronyms... iv PART I Developing a Macrophyte Management Zoning Approach for Chautauqua Lake CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1.1 Overview... 1-1 1.2 History of Human Impacts on Chautauqua Lake... 1-2 1.3 Background of Chautauqua Lake Management Efforts... 1-4 1.4 New Integrated Management Approach... 1-5 CHAPTER 2: Goals and Objectives 2.1. Introduction: Problem Statement... 2-1 2.2. Why a Macrophyte Management Strategy?... 2-1 2.3. Why this Approach Is Unique... 2-2 2.4. Stakeholder Collaboration... 2-2 2.5. Goal... 2-3 2.6. Objectives... 2-3 CHAPTER 3: Environmental, Social, and Economic Setting 3.1 Introduction... 3-1 3.2 Environmental Setting... 3-2 3.2.1 Chautauqua Lake and Watershed... 3-2 3.2.2 Productivity and Trophic State... 3-4 3.2.3 Aquatic Habitat... 3-5 3.3 Social and Cultural Setting... 3-8 3.4 Economic Setting... 3-9 3.5 Implications for Management... 3-9 CHAPTER 4: Recent Status of the Macrophyte Community 4.1 Introduction... 4-1 4.2 Historical Conditions... 4-1 4.3 Recent Conditions... 4-3 4.3.1 Littoral Zone Boundaries... 4-3 4.3.2 Species Richness... 4-3 4.3.3 Unique Macrophyte Communities... 4-3 4.3.4 Invasive Species Threats... 4-4 4.4 Major Findings... 4-4 4.4.1 Data Source for Macrophyte Maps... 4-4 4.4.2 Species Abundance... 4-4 4.5 Implications for Management... 4-5

CHAPTER 5: Ecologically Important Habitat 5.1 Introduction... 5-1 5.2 Methods... 5-1 5.3 Major Findings... 5-2 5.3.1 Natural Shoreline Areas... 5-2 5.3.2 Fisheries Habitat... 5-3 5.3.3 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species... 5-3 5.3.4 Wetlands... 5-3 5.3.5 Unique Plant Communities... 5-4 5.3.6 Important Bird Areas... 5-4 5.4 Implications for Management... 5-5 CHAPTER 6: Human Uses of Chautauqua Lake 6.1 Introduction... 6-1 6.2 Methods... 6-1 6.3 Major Findings... 6-2 6.3.1 Community Access and Uses of Chautauqua Lake... 6-2 Access via Boat Launches, Marinas, and Docks... 6-2 Motorboating and Related Activities... 6-3 Sailing, Kayaking, and Canoeing... 6-3 Fishing... 6-3 Swimming... 6-4 Campgrounds and Parks... 6-4 Residential Development (Density)... 6-4 Conservation and Wildlife Management Areas... 6-4 Undeveloped Shore... 6-5 Water Intakes... 6-5 6.3.2 Intensity of Human Uses Based on Survey Results... 6-5 6.3.3 Human Use Intensity by Area... 6-6 6.4 Implications for Management... 6-6 CHAPTER 7: Lake Zones Based on Environmental Sensitivity and Human Use 7.1 Introduction... 7-1 7.2 Methods... 7-1 7.2.1 Map Creation... 7-2 7.2.2 Alphanumeric Codes... 7-3 7.3 Major Findings... 7-3 7.3.1 Environmental Restrictions... 7-3 Natural Shoreline Areas/Zones... 7-4 Game Fish Spawning and Rearing Zones... 7-4 Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species Areas/Zones... 7-4 Unique Plant Community Areas/Zones... 7-4 Water Supply Zones... 7-4

7.3.2 Human Use Areas... 7-4 Lake Access Areas... 7-4 Lakeshore Use Areas... 7-4 Marina Areas... 7-4 Residential Areas... 7-5 Swimming Areas... 7-5 Undeveloped Land Areas... 7-5 Conservation Areas... 7-5 Water Intake Areas... 7-5 7.3.3 Combined Areas and Codes... 7-5 7.4 Implications for Management... 7-6 CHAPTER 8: Evaluation of Macrophyte Management Techniques 8.1 Introduction... 8-1 8.2 Sources of Information... 8-2 8.3 Physical Techniques... 8-2 8.3.1 Benthic Barriers... 8-2 8.3.2 Hand Pulling... 8-3 8.3.3 Hand Cutting... 8-4 8.4 Mechanical Techniques... 8-5 8.4.1 Automated Macrophyte Management Devices (Weed Rolling)... 8-5 8.4.2 Mechanical Harvesting... 8-6 8.4.3 Diver Harvesting... 8-6 8.4.4 Diver-Operated Suction Harvesting... 8-7 8.4.5 Hydroraking... 8-8 8.5 Chemical Management Options... 8-9 8.5.1 2,4-D (AquaKleen and Navigate )... 8-9 8.5.2 Endothall (Aquathol )... 8-10 8.5.3 Glyphosate (Rodeo, AquaMaster, and AquaPro )... 8-11 8.5.4 Triclopyr (Renovate OTF /Renovate LZR )... 8-11 8.6 Biological Management Options... 8-12 8.6.1 Herbivorous Insects... 8-13 8.7 Behavioral Management Techniques Focus on Prevention... 8-14 8.7.1 Public Education and Outreach... 8-14 8.7.2 Boat Launch Stewards... 8-15 8.7.3 Regulatory Controls... 8-16 8.8 Early Monitoring and Emergency Response... 8-17 8.9 No Intervention to Manage Macrophytes... 8-18 8.10 Implications for Management... 8-18

CHAPTER 9: Recommended Macrophyte Management Techniques by Zone 9.1 Introduction... 9-1 9.2 Methods... 9-1 9.3 Recommendations: Macrophyte Management Techniques by Zone... 9-2 9.3.1 Benthic Barriers... 9-2 9.3.2 Hand Pulling... 9-3 9.3.3 Hand Cutting... 9-3 9.3.4 Weed Rolling... 9-3 9.3.5 Mechanical Harvesting... 9-4 9.3.6 Diver Harvesting... 9-4 9.3.7 Diver-Operated Suction Harvesting... 9-5 9.3.8 Herbicide Application... 9-5 9.3.9 Summary of Acceptable Macrophyte Management Techniques... 9-5 9.4 New Invasives Emergency Response... 9-6 9.5 Implications for Management... 9-7 CHAPTER 10: Ongoing Assessment of Lake Zones and Macrophyte Management Techniques 10.1 Introduction... 10-1 10.2 Methods... 10-1 10.2.1 Updates to Zones Containing Ecologically Sensitive Areas... 10-1 10.2.2 Updates to Human Use Zones... 10-2 10.2.3 Updates to Macrophyte Management Techniques... 10-3 10.3 Recommendations and Implications for Management... 10-3 PART II Applying the Macrophyte Management Zoning Approach on Chautauqua Lake CHAPTER 11: Macrophyte Abundance and Type 11.1 Introduction... 11-1 11.2 Methods... 11-1 11.3 Major Findings... 11-2 11.3.1 Macrophyte Abundance... 11-2 11.3.2 Macrophyte Species Distribution and Density... 11-3 11.3.3 Priority Macrophyte Areas... 11-5 11.4 Implications for Management... 11-5 CHAPTER 12: Conflicts between Humans and Macrophytes 12.1 Introduction... 12-1 12.2 Methods... 12-1 12.3 Major Findings... 12-1 12.4 Implications for Management... 12-2

CHAPTER 13: Macrophyte Management Scenarios and Costs 13.1 Introduction... 13-1 13.2 Methods... 13-1 13.3 Major Findings... 13-1 13.3.1 Identification of Management Options... 13-1 13.3.2 Estimated Costs of Management Options... 13-2 13.4 Implications for Management... 13-3 CHAPTER 14: Macrophyte Monitoring and Assessment 14.1 Introduction... 14-1 14.2 Methods... 14-1 14.2.1 Rake-Toss Distribution and Abundance... 14-1 14.2.2 Acoustic Biovolume Mapping... 14-2 14.2.3 Updates and Revisions... 14-3 14.3 Major Findings... 14-3 14.4 Implications for Management... 14-4 CHAPTER 15: Implementation 15.1 Introduction... 15-1 15.2 Methods... 15-1 15.3 Major Findings... 15-2 15.3.1 Roles of Local, State, and Federal Government in Lake Management... 15-2 15.3.2 Local Partners in Chautauqua Lake and Watershed Management... 15-3 Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development... 15-3 Chautauqua Lake Management Commission... 15-4 Chautauqua Watershed Conservancy... 15-4 Chautauqua Lake Association... 15-4 Chautauqua County Soil & Water Conservation District... 15-4 15.3.3 Capacity Analysis... 15-5 15.4 Barriers to Implementation... 15-5 15.5 New York State Environmental Quality Review Act... 15-6 15.6 Recommendations... 15-6 15.6.1 Continued and Strengthened Collaboration... 15-6 15.6.2 Creation of an Alliance... 15-6 15.6.3 Deployment of Resources... 15-7 15.6.4 Year 1: Crawl... 15-8 15.6.5 Years 2 5: Walk... 15-8 15.6.6 Years 6+: Run... 15-9 LITERATURE CITED

Tables, Figures, Maps TABLES Table 1-1. History of Mechanical Harvesting and Herbicide Treatment, Chautauqua Lake... 1-7 Table 3-1. Subwatershed Characteristics... 3-4 Table 3-2. Water Quality Indicator Thresholds and Chautauqua Lake Conditions... 3-5 Table 3-3. Spawning Preferences of Common Chautauqua Lake Fish Species... 3-6 Table 4-1. Species of Macrophytes Observed in Chautauqua Lake, 1937-2007... 4-6 Table 6-1. Popularity of Cited Recreational Uses, Rank Order... 6-5 Table 7-1. Environmental Restrictions... 7-4 Table 7-2. Human Use Areas... 7-5 Table 7-3. Macrophyte Management Zones, Defined by Human Use and Environmental Restrictions... 7-7 Table 8-1. Macrophyte Management Techniques for Chautauqua Lake (Summary)... 8-19 Table 8-2. Macrophyte Management Techniques Rejected for Use in Chautauqua Lake (Summary)... 8-21 Table 9-1. Description of Mactophyte Management Techniques... 9-8 Table 9-2. Macrophyte Management Techniques by Human Use Zones... 9-10 Table 9-3. Macrophyte Management Techniques by Human Use Zones Containing Environmentally Sensitive Areas... 9-11 Table 9-4. Macrophyte Management Techniques by Human Use Zones and Environmentally Sensitive Areas Combined... 9-12 Table 9-5. Management Techniques for Macrophyte Management Zones... 9-13 Table 9-6. Consolidated Macrophyte Management Regimes... 9-16 Table 9-7. Allowable Techniques by Macrophyte Management Zone (North & South Basins)... 9-17 Table 11-1. Semi-quantitative Metrics for Macrophyte Biomass Based on Rake Toss... 11-2 Table 12-1. Assignment of Conflict Zone Priority... 12-1 Table 13-1. Codes for Macrophyte Management Techniques by Zone... 13-5 Table 13-2. Estimated Management Costs by Priority Areas... 13-6 Table 13-3. Zones with High Priority Management Areas... 13-7 Table 13-4. Zones with Medium Priority Management Areas... 13-8 Table 13-5. Zones with Low Priority Management Areas... 13-10 FIGURES Figure 3-1. Location Map: Chautauqua Lake Watershed... 3-2 Figure 3-2. Chautauqua Lake Subwatersheds... 3-3 Figure 3-3. Land Use in the Watershed... 3-8 Figure 4-1. Macrophyte Species Richness in Chautauqua Lake, 1937-2007... 4-2 Figure 4-2. Percent of Rake Toss Sites with the Eight Most Common Macrophyte Species, 2007... 4-5 Figure 6-1. Regions of the Lake Cited for Recreational Usage... 6-6 Figure 7-1. Development of Macrophyte Management Zones Based on Human Use and Environmental Sensitivity... 7-2 Figure 8-1. Section of the Product Label for Renovate OTF... 8-12 Figure 9-1. Macrophyte Management Alternatives Arrayed by Degree of Aggressiveness... 9-5

MAPS (at the end of each chapter) Map 3-1. Water Depths and Littoral Zone Map 4-1. Macrophyte Abundance by Type Map 5-1. Ecologically Important Habitat (North & South Basins) Map 5-2. Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map 6-1. Human Uses Map 6-2. Recreational Uses Map 6-3. Human Use Zones Map 6-4. Human Use Intensity Map 7-1. Human Use Zones and Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map 7-2. Macrophyte Management Zones (North & South Basins) Map 9-1. Macrophyte Management Techniques (North & South Basins) Map 11-1. Macrophyte Abundance of All Species Map 11-2. Macrophyte Distribution by Species Map 11-3. Macrophyte Abundance and Distribution of Key Species Map 12-1. Human Use Conflicts with Macrophytes Map 12-2. Human Use Conflicts with Macrophytes Prioritized (North & South Basins) Map 12-3. Conflict Areas Prioritized (North & South Basins) Map 13-1. Priority Areas with Management Options (North & South Basins) Appendixes APPENDIX 1. Public Opinion Survey on Recreational Uses of Chautauqua Lake APPENDIX 2. Macrophyte Abundance by Type (Maps)

Executive Summary Seeking Balance for Chautauqua Lake Chautauqua Lake is a vital resource to New York s western-most county and the region. It is a recreational and economic cornerstone for people who live and play in the area, and it also serves as home to wide variety of plants and animals that are profoundly affected by human activity within the lake s watershed. Submerged aquatic plants, called macrophytes, have existed at levels of concern in the lake for many years, interfering with recreational uses of the lake. Chautauqua Lake s communities have been challenged to balance the needs of groups who use the lake primarily for recreation, and those who place great importance on its function as habitat for plant and animal life. The Chautauqua Lake Macrophyte Management Strategy assesses unique challenges facing the Lake, and identifies a range of macrophyte management techniques that can serve various human needs while supporting a healthy ecosystem for the benefit of all life within the watershed. The result is a balanced, holistic strategy that will work for the Chautauqua Lake community well into the future. Managing Macrophytes: Analysis of Options A range of methods exists for managing aquatic vegetation. At present, however, the only large-scale macrophyte management technique being employed to control the Chautauqua Lake macrophyte community is mechanical weed harvesting. To make use of a broader range of options, the community must seek permission from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), which requires a detailed analysis of the Lake that takes into account human uses, types and density of weeds, identification of priority conflict areas, and the environmental sensitivities within these areas. This analysis must also include the weighing of pros and cons associated with various management options. The desire to open the toolbox to a broader range of management options has prompted an effort to develop this Macrophyte Management Strategy (MMS) and ultimately implement a range of options that make economic and environmental sense. Developing the Strategy This document presents a unique approach to macrophyte management; the strategy applies concepts of land use zoning to Chautauqua Lake to delineate zones within the Lake s littoral zone based on environmental conditions and human uses. This approach enables managers to identify areas of the lake where conflicts are most severe and assign priorities for management. The MMS includes a detailed review of current macrophyte management techniques and summarizes their costs, benefits, and risks. There is no one macrophyte management technique that is appropriate for every zone of Chautauqua Lake. Rather, the zoning-based approach recommends the management techniques that can be used in each zone based on the type and intensity of human uses and the zone s environmental sensitivity. While this is not a perfect solution to balancing conflicting interests, it provides the level of detail needed to make an informed decision about what management techniques are recommended for use in specific areas. A Guide to the Document The MMS is presented in two parts. Part I: Developing a Macrophyte Management Zoning Approach for Chautauqua Lake provides a summary of recent human use and environmental conditions and demonstrates how the lake zones were developed. Additionally, an inventory and review of macrophyte management measures and recommendations for their applicability within the various zones is presented. Part I culminates in a zoning map with allowable management techniques that can be employed for each zone. The maps for this section are to be updated periodically (3-5 years) as human uses of the lake evolve, environmental conditions change, and new management techniques are approved. Part II: Applying the Macrophyte Management Zoning Approach on Chautauqua Lake defines and prioritizes the primary conflict areas between humans and macrophytes, based on the intensity and type of these uses and the density of macrophytes. A scenario for managing these priority areas using recommended management Page i

techniques offered in Part I is also discussed. Part II recommends a re-evaluation each year of conflict areas as the density and types of weeds change in relation to human uses. The MMS concludes with a recommended institutional framework for implementation that involves collaboration among current and evolving stakeholders. It is hoped that this approach will not only intensify the management of macrophytes in Chautauqua Lake, but may also serve as a template for other communities that are facing similar challenges. Page ii

Acknowledgments The Chautauqua County Legislature, through the innovative use of the County s Occupancy Tax to fund worthwhile projects for the improvement of the County s Lakes and Waterways, provided much of the funding for this project. Additional funding was provided by the Chautauqua Lake Partnership and the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The Chautauqua Lake Watershed Management Plan was completed in 2010. A key goal of this plan was the development of a strategy to manage nuisance aquatic vegetation in Chautauqua Lake. The preparation of this Macrophyte Management Strategy was an ambitious effort that involved a dedicated group of member organizations, professional consultants, and a dedicated group of stakeholders. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals. Vince Horrigan, Chautauqua County Executive Chautauqua County Department of Planning and Economic Development Kevin Sanvidge, Director Mark Geise, Deputy Director Donald McCord, Senior Planner Dave McCoy, Watershed Coordinator Debbie Liliestedt, Senior Typist Consultants Cedar Eden Environmental, LLC CEE was the primary technical consultant responsible for the field work, GIS-based data collection and analysis, and synthesis of the Macrophyte Management Strategy. EcoLogic, LLC, Aquatic, Terrestrial and Wetland Consultants EcoLogic provided technical guidance as well as formatting and editing of the Macrophyte Management Strategy document. Pashek Associates Pashek Associates provided assistance with GIS mapping and graphics. Technical Review Committee Jane Conroe, Jamestown Audubon Society and Chautauqua Watershed Conservancy Rebecca Nystrom, Jamestown Community College John Jablonski III, Chautauqua Watershed Conservancy Thomas Erlandson, PhD, Chautauqua County Water Quality Task Force Karen Rine, Chautauqua Lake Partnership Key Partners New York State Department of Environmental Conservation United States Army Corps of Engineers Chautauqua Lake Management Commission partners and members Page iii

Key Acronyms CCDPED CEE CLA CLMC CLP CLWMP CRCF CSLAP CWC EBM EDRR GEIS GIS HAB IBA MEA MMS NAIP NYNHP NYSDEC NYSDOS-DCR RTE SAV SEIS SEQRA SWCD TMDL USACE USEPA Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development Cedar Eden Environmental Chautauqua Lake Association Chautauqua Lake Management Commission Chautauqua Lake Partnership Chautauqua Lake Watershed Management Plan Chautauqua Region Community Foundation Citizens Statewide Lake Assessment Program Chautauqua Watershed Conservancy Ecosystem-Based Management Early Detection and Rapid Response Generic Environmental Impact Statement Geographic Information System Harmful Algal Bloom Important Bird Area Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Macrophyte Management Strategy National Agriculture Imagery Program New York Natural Heritage Program New York State Department of Environmental Conservation New York State Department of State Division of Coastal Resources Rare, threatened, and endangered species Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement State Environmental Quality Review Act Soil and Water Conservation District Total Maximum Daily Load U.S. Army Corps of Engineers United States Environmental Protection Agency Page iv