LargePelagicMechanisedGillnetFishingSystemsofOdishaCoastIndia

Similar documents
Design features of Seer fish gill nets operated by OBM along the selected landing centres of Junagadh District, Gujarat

The purse seine has been in operation commercially

Design aspects of ring seine nets without pocket of Ratnagiri, Maharashtra

An Appraisal of Trawl Fishery of Kerala

Structural Changes in the Ring Seine Fishing System. 4.1 Introduction

Economic efficiency of mechanised fishing in Tamil Nadu a case study in Chennai

Cost and Earnings of Out Board Engine (OBM) Gill Netters along the Veraval harbour, Gujarat

CMFRI bulletin 44 NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN MARINE FISHERIES. Part One. MANDAPAM CAMP September 1987

MARINE FISHERIES INFORMATION SERVICE

SMALL BOAT TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY NORTH-WEST COAST OF SRI LANKA R. Maldeniya

Fishing Craft and Gear for Small Pelagics

pfli ) f 'fhi H.r'\j,ijn''^

Labour Deployment and Wage Distribution in Ring Seine Fishery of Central Kerala

Total Factor Productivity of Tuna Fisheries in Lakshadweep

AN OVERVIEW OF EXPLORING POSSIBILITIES OF COOPERATION ON INVESTMENT & TECHNICAL COLABORATION WITH NORWAY & ICELAND

Summary and Recommendations

Current Status of Crab Fishery in the Artisanal Sector along Gulf of Mannar and Palk bay Coasts

Figure 1. Pair trawlers are in operation.

Production economics of non mechanised fishing in the selected fish landing centres of Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu

Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal Indian mackerel fishery

PRESENTATION ON WILD CAUGHT SHRIMP OF INDIA BY MR. A.J. THARAKAN PRESIDENT OF THE SEAFOOD EXPORTERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA

TECHNICAL AND ECONOMICAL FEASBILITY IN THE OPERATION OF RAFT CATAMARAN OF KRISHNAPATNAM COAST, ANDHRA PRADESH

"Present status of Tropical tuna fisheries in Iran"

GENERAL INFORMATION ON TOGO RELATED TO FISHERIES

LIST OF TABLES. Districtwise distribution. in Kerala Districtwise distribution. Districtwise distribution

R.P. Prabath K. JAYASINGHE National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA) Colombo 15 SRI LANKA

S.S.K. Haputhantri. Abstract

Status of Monitoring, Control & Surveillance (MCS) in Fisheries Sector

Tuna Fishery of India with Special Reference to Biology and Population Characteristics of Neritic Tunas Exploited from Indian EEZ

Socioeconomic Characteristics of Payang Seine (Lampara) and Driftnet Fisheries in West Sumatra, Indonesia

Catch per unit effort of coastal prawn trammel net fishery in Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea

Trawl fishery management of Eastern Arabian Sea

BOBP/REP/57 GCP/RAS/118/MUL. BAY OF BENGAL PROGRAMME Small-Scale Fisherfolk Communities. Introduction of New Outrigger Canoes in Indonesia

Motorization of traditional craft and its effect on the exploitation of tuna and whitebait anchovy resources at Vizhinjam

Trends in penaeid shrimp landings by sona boats at Visakhapatnam Fishing Harbour, Andhra Pradesh

IOTC-2016-WPTT18-INFO3 Received: 4 November 2016

Age and growth, mortality and stock assessment of Euthynnus affinis (Cantor) from Maharashtra waters

Model Curriculum. Fishing Gear Technician SECTOR: SUB-SECTOR: OCCUPATION: REF ID: NSQF LEVEL:

Chapter 5. Material Substitution in Gill Nets for Seer and Tuna

SMALL SCALE FISHERIES GOVERNANCE - SIERRA LEONE AS A CASE STUDY. Kadiatu S. Kamara FAO Tenure and Users Right 2018, Yeosu- South Korea

Present Status of Off-shore Fishery Resources and Information on Tuna Fishery in MYANMAR.

Marine Fisheries Census 2005 and 2010 of Andhra Pradesh: A comparison

Socio-economic status of fishermen in district Srinagar of Jammu and Kashmir

The bycatch records of sharks, marine turtle and seabirds by the Malaysian tuna longliners and the Malaysian coastal fisheries

Regional Logbook Best Practices Guidelines: Module 4, 5 and 6: Daily Catch Reporting, Biological Data, Socio-economic Data

Performance Assessment of Tuna Longline Fishing in Lakshadweep Sea, India

MARINE FISHERIES INFORMATION SERVICE

The use of Traditional FADs in Thai Fisheries and the Review of it's possibility to Apply in IOTC area. Abstract

ASSESSMENT OF ARTISANAL FISHING GEARS IMPACT ON KING FISH (Scomberomorus commerson) IN THE KENYAN MARINE ECOSYSTEM.

Neritic Tuna Catch, Species composition and monthly average landings in Sri Lankan Tuna Gillnet Fishery operate within EEZ

AMBLYGASTER SIRM (WALBAUM) OFF THE NEGOMBO COAST

Socio Economic Impact of Trawl ban on the livelihood of Marine Fishers' of Palk Bay, Tamil Nadu

Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal hilsa fishery June 2012

GCP/RAS/040/SWE. BAY OF BENGAL PROGRAMME Development of Small-Scale Fisheries BOB P/WP/28 FISHING TRIALS IN BANGLADESH

Gill net Selectivity and Fishing Pressure on Indian Major Carp in Thirumoorthy Reservoir, Tamil Nadu

PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON THE PURSE SEINE FISHERY IN THE SOUTH-WEST COAST OF SRI LANKA

ValidatingWindProfileEquationsduringTropicalStormDebbyin2012

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 7, No 2, 2018,

***This summary does not include shad and herring net requirements.***

A Dynamic Optimization Model for Marine Fisheries Management in Kerala

A present scenario of seine nets fishing gears of pulicat coast, Tamil Nadu, India

MARINE FISHERIES INFORMATION SERVICE

STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISHERY RESOURCES OF INDIA

An economic analysis of fishing crafts in Tharuvaikulam fishing village, Tamil Nadu

Trawl Fishery Management Myanmar

GEAR TECHNOLOGY NOTE - Towed Gear

Estimates on potential yield and maximum sustainable fleet size for marine fisheries in Kerala

Model Curriculum. Marine Capture Fisherman SECTOR : SUB-SECTOR : OCCUPATION : REF ID : NSQF LEVEL :

State Department for Fisheries and The Blue Economy

Utilization of IRS P4 ocean colour data for potential fishing zone A cost benefit analysis

6. IND-28 : PLYWOOD CANOE, 9.1 m WITH 9 hpdiesel ENGINE

PRAWN FISHERY BY THE 'BIG TRAWLERS' ALONG THE NORTHEAST COAST

Diversity of selective and non-selective fishing gear and their impact on the White Nile River, Khartoum State, Sudan

+ 6 Crs ( Crc) construction.

The Development of Multi-Rig Trawling Systems in the UK Past, Present and Future?

CHARACTERISTICS OF CAPTURE FISHERY RESOURCES, THEIR ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT K. ALAGARAJA

National Report of Guyana s Fishing Industry to the Caribbean Fisheries Forum. Marine Fishery Aquaculture Inland Fishery. - Brackish-water Culture

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

INVESTIGATION RESULTS

Tuna Fishery Status and Future Management Plans for Indian Ocean

5. purse seines 3 000

Estimation and Analysis of Fish Catches by Category Based on Multidimensional Time Series Database on Sea Fishery in Greece

Energy Consumption of Small Scale Fishing Vessel Operations in Indonesia A Case Study in Palabuhanratu, Indonesia

PROJECT Nº 96/005: SIZE SELECTIVITY AND RELATIVE FISHING POWER OF BALTIC COD GILL-NETS

COASTAL & OFFSHORE PACIFIC CORPORATION 242 Rosa Corte Walnut Creek, CA Via

Best Practice Guidance for Assessing the Financial Performance of Fishing Gear: Industry-led gear trials

Outlook for global tuna stocks and the contribution of Indonesia to global tuna management

Characterization of the Sole Fishery in The Gambia. Gambia-Senegal Sustainable Fisheries Program (Ba Nafaa)

NFR 8. Tuna fisheries in French Polynesia in SCTB16 Working Paper

COUNTRY INVENTORY FISHERIES MONITORING SYSTEMS

Economics, fisheries and responsible fisheries management

Indigenous Technical Knowledge (ITK) of coastal fisherfolk on climate change - a case study in Chennai, south-east coast of India

Fish Conservation and Management

Updated landings information for the commercial fisheries in Puerto Rico with emphasis on silk and queen snapper and parrotfish fisheries

SOMALIA National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2015

BAY OF BENGAL PROGRAMME Development of Small-Scale Fisheries

Journal of Coastal Development ISSN : SELECTIVITY OF Decapterus macarelus (SCAD) DRIFT GILLNET IN KAYELI BAY MALUKU BY KITAHARA S METHOD

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA LIBERIA MARITIME AUTHORITY

Reviewing effectiveness of conservation and management measures on sharks in Sri Lanka over past five years

DESCRIPTION OF THE MALTESE LONGLINE FISHERY TARGETING BLUEFIN TUNA (THYNNUS THUNNUS L.) IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA

Transcription:

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: D Agriculture and Veterinary Volume 16 Issue 1 Version 1.0 Year 2016 Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA) Online ISSN: 2249-4626 Print ISSN: 0975-5896 DOI: 10.17406 Large Pelagic Mechanised Gillnet Fishing Systems of Odisha Coast, India By P. S. Muhammed Sherief, Saly N. Thomas & Leela Edwin Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, India Abstract- Mechanisation brings about major developments in fishing systems. Main fishing gear operated in Odisha state targeting large pelagics are drift gillnets. Odisha coast is an ecologically sensitive area having one of the four significant arribada beaches of Olive Ridley turtle, with three mass nesting beaches. Large mesh drift gillnets are reported to be the main gear contributing to incidental catch of turtles. The gillnet fishing sector has undergone many changes during the last few decades in terms of size of craft and gear, area of operation and trip duration. This paper deals with design and general features of mechanised gillnet fishing system operated in the coastal waters of Odisha. Presently mechanised gillnetters of 8-19 m L OA with 70 to 140 hp inboard engines go for voyage fishing of up to 30 days. Drift gillnets of the states are made of Polyamide (PA) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) having mesh size ranging from 80-380 mm. Total fleet size of the net increased substantially over the years extending up to 9300 m. Drift gillnets targeting tuna, seerfish, bill fish and shark are operated mainly during night time in waters up to a depth of 1200 m. In view of the increase in the size of the gear running several kilometres, there are more chances of turtle kill which calls for monitoring and surveillance. Keywords: large mesh drift gill net, HDPE, polyamide, large pelagic fishes, odisha. GJSFR-D Classification : FOR Code: 070107, 070499 LargePelagicMechanisedGillnetFishingSystemsofOdishaCoastIndia Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of : 2016. P. S. Muhammed Sherief, Saly N. Thomas & Leela Edwin. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Large Pelagic Mechanised Gillnet Fishing Systems of Odisha Coast, India P. S. Muhammed Sherief α, Saly N. Thomas σ & Leela Edwin ρ Abstract- Mechanisation brings about major developments in fishing systems. Main fishing gear operated in Odisha state targeting large pelagics are drift gillnets. Odisha coast is an ecologically sensitive area having one of the four significant arribada beaches of Olive Ridley turtle, with three mass nesting beaches. Large mesh drift gillnets are reported to be the main gear contributing to incidental catch of turtles. The gillnet fishing sector has undergone many changes during the last few decades in terms of size of craft and gear, area of operation and trip duration. This paper deals with design and general features of mechanised gillnet fishing system operated in the coastal waters of Odisha. Presently mechanised gillnetters of 8-19 m L OA with 70 to 140 hp inboard engines go for voyage fishing of up to 30 days. Drift gillnets of the states are made of Polyamide (PA) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) having mesh size ranging from 80-380 mm. Total fleet size of the net increased substantially over the years extending up to 9300 m. Drift gillnets targeting tuna, seerfish, bill fish and shark are operated mainly during night time in waters up to a depth of 1200 m. In view of the increase in the size of the gear running several kilometres, there are more chances of turtle kill which calls for monitoring and surveillance. Keywords: large mesh drift gill net, HDPE, polyamide, large pelagic fishes, odisha. I. Introduction G illnetting is a highly selective fishing gear and one of the predominant energy efficient fishing methods spending fuel mainly for propulsion. Drift netting is a type of gillnetting in which the net is freely allowed to drift in the sea. Drift nets having fleet length up to 15000 m are in operation in coastal and deeper waters of India. Drift gillnet is mainly operated in high seas to catch large pelagic species like seerfish tuna, sailfish, sword fish and shark. The gillnet fisheries of India are considered to be the mainstay of the artisanal sector, comprising of small scale localised operation (Thomas, 2010).The gillnet fisheries of Odisha were the major gears contributed towards the marine fish landings. Among the major maritime States of India, Odisha stands 8 th in marine fish production (Kumar and Shivani, 2014).Successful introduction of large pelagic gillnets in east coast of India was reported by Pajot, (1993). Scariah et al., (1995), reported marine fisheries of Odisha and production trends. Chaidee et al. (2007) Author α σ ρ: Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, P. O. Matsyapuri, CIFT Junction, Cochin, Kerala, India. e-mail: sheriefmuhammed@gmail.com effectively used drift gillnets in marine resource surveys conducted in Bay of Bengal. Fishing crafts and gears operated off Orissa reported by (Sivakami and Kuriakose, 2009). Details of gillnet fishing systems of Odisha coast were reported by (Edwin et al, 2014). In the mechanised fishing system of Odisha 35% crafts are gillnetters (Kumar and Shivani, 2014). Thomas (2005) reported HDPE as a new material for gillnets along with nylon multifilament which is used in north east and west coast of India. Odisha State has the coastline of 480 km among the maritime states of India. The continental shelf up to 200m depth covers an area of 24,000 sq. km, which is 4.5% of the total area of the country s continental shelf. It has 6 coastal districts viz. Ganjam, Puri, Jagatsinghpur, Kendrapara, Bhadrak and Balasore. The mechanised sector mostly uses trawl net and gillnets. As per marine fisheries census conducted by CMFRI, 2010 a total of 20257 mechanized gillnetters are operated in the Indian waters. In Odisha coast, there are 2248 mechanised fishing crafts in Odisha state; of which781 are gillnetters (Fig.2) (CMFRI, 2010). These vessels operate, gillnets made of Polyamide (PA) and HDPE. Probably, Odisha is the only state in the country to witness an increase in the traditional fishing vessels along with modern fishing technology during the same time. Therefore the aim of the study was to document the design and structural details of mechanised gillnetters and large mesh gillnets operated in the Odisha coast. II. Materials and Methods The data was collected during January 2012-2013 from the selected fishing harbour and landing centres of Odisha using structured questionnaire covering details of the mechanised gillnet fisheries sector in Odisha. The details crafts and gears were recorded according to Fyson (1986), Sree Krishna & Shenoy (2001), and Thomas & Hridayanathan, (2002). Design details were depicted as per Nedelec (1975).Representative samples of fishing vessels were selected based on the most prevalent designs of the region and the type of operation. Lines plan and structural details of most widely used gillnetters were collected during the survey. The details of the engine power, fish hold capacity, number of crew, type of fishing, average fuel consumption etc. were collected. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D) Volume XVI Issue I V ersion I Year 2016 271

The scantling details of different parts such as hull, deck and wheel house were measured and recorded. Data on gillnet designs, fabrication, operation and investment details were collected and recorded. The structural, operational and design differences in the common large mesh gillnets operated in different coastal districts viz., details regarding the dimensions, materials, accessories like floats, sinkers and operational parameters of the gillnets were also covered. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D) Volume XVI Issue V ersion I Year 2016 28 I III. Results and Discussion a) Fishing vessel The details of gillnetter operating from Odisha are given in table 1 and the detailed specifications of large mesh drift gillnets are given in Table 2. The design of large mesh drift gill net are given in Fig.2-3. Table 1 Type of gillnetter L OA (m) Horsepower Small gillnetters 8 12 70-97 Medium size gillnetters 13-18 97-110 Large gillnetters 18-22 106-140 Fig. 1 : Coastal map of Odisha showing study area Total Puri Jagatsinghpur Bhadrak 2 111 190 The drift gillnets of India which was small-scale in nature, till early 2000s, showed a clear shift to the large scale operations, at least in certain pockets of the country (Thomas, 2010).The change in the fishing systems from subsistence-based activities to commercial operations from simple, low-cost operations to comparatively hi-tech, high-investment operations. Earlier the gear is deployed from mechanised boats (10 m) in the inshore waters within 10-15 km from the foreshore (Pati and Pati,1982). Among the different types of crafts used in mechanized sector of Odisha, 35% are gillnetters (Kumar and Shivani, 2014). 781 Balasore 478 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Fig.(2) : Distribution of gillnetters along coastal districts in Odisha (Source of data: CMFRI, 2012a)

Previously mechanised Pablo boats ranging 10 to 20 m L OA with drift gillnet is operated for harvesting large pelagic fishes of Odisha coast (Silas and Pillai, 1985., Pravin et al, 2008). Presently small gillnetters operating in Odisha have range of 8 m to 12.0 m L OA and they are constructed of wood. These vessels are fitted with Indian made engines with engine power in the range of 70-97hp. Box type of steering are usually used in these fishing vessels. Electronic equipments such as GPS and echosounder are used for monitoring the depth of operation, nature of fishing ground, safety, navigation and location of fishing grounds. Most of the vessels are dry docked once in a year. The number of crew onboard is 4-6 including serang and engine driver. Fig. 2 and 3 : A view of typical mechanised gillnetters operated from Odisha The size of large gillnetters exceeds 18 m L OA. Wood and fibre glass are the main construction material used in this type of vessels and the vessels are well equipped for multiday deep sea fishing. Large gillnettersare installed with engines of 106-140hp. The fish hold with made with wood and fibre and can store The L OA of medium size gillnetters range from 13 m to 18 m. Vessels are constructed of either wood or fibre glass. These types of gillnetters are installed with Indian made engines with power ranging from 97 to 110hp.Box type of steering systems is used in medium size trawlers. Diesel is stored in 1-3 tanks, with a total capacity of 3,000 to 5,000 litres. Ice storage capacity of this type of vessels ranges from 10-15 m 3.Fishing is normally multiday and it extends from 8 to12 days. The vessel has a crew complement of 7-10.View of atypical mechanised gillnetter from Odisha and its profile and deck layout are given in Fig. 2, 3 and 4. 400 kg to 10 tonnes of fish. Generally2-4 diesel tanks are provided with a total capacity of 3,000-7,000 litres. The steering used is of box type. Large gillnetters undertake multiday fishing extending from 10 to 17 days with crew complement of 8-12 fishermen. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D) Volume XVI Issue I V ersion I Year 2016 29 1 Fig.4 : Profile and deck layout of a typical gillnetter from Odisha

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D) Volume XVI Issue V ersion I Year 2016 30 I The engine used in Odisha by mechanized is Indian made marine diesel engines. Large sized mechanized prefer high power Indian made diesel engine. Diesel cost forms the major share in the operational expenditure of the gillnetters. The diesel consumption per hour varied from 6 to 20 litre h -1, depending on the size, installed engine horse power and displacement of the vessel, location of the fishing ground and duration of the fishing trip. Almost all mechanized gillnetters in the Odisha are equipped with modern electronic equipment such as GPS, echosounder and VHF transceiver. Mobile phones are also used for shore communication.the wheel house is constructed on the middle of the main deck L OA (m) Type of trawler Table. 3 : Investment for gillnetter, gear and accessories and an awning is provided behind the wheel house. Even in multiday fishing vessels toilet facilities are not provided. In medium size and large gillnetters food is prepared onboard. Berth facilities for crew are provided in all medium size and large gillnetters. As the initial investment for a fishing vessel is high, most of the fishing vessels are of multiple ownership. Fishing vessels are built by order of the investor and construction takes 3-4 months. Total investment including engine, gear and accessories range from 1.75 million for small wooden gillnetter (8.7-12.0m L OA ), Rs. 4.6 million for large steel gillnetter (>16.0m L OA ), to Rs. 5.7 million for medium size FRP gillnetter (12.1-16.0 m L OA ) (Table 3). Horsepower Investment, Rs. x 10 5 Vessel Engine Gear and accessories 8.0-12.0 Wooden 07-97 15 7 5 27 13.- 18.0 Wood FRP 97-110 30 12 5 47 >18.0 Wood FRP 106-140 45 18 7 70 b) Fishing Gear Polyamide monofilament and multifilament netting are used for making gill net in Odisha. Large meshed (100 mm) and very large meshed (150-200mm) are very common types of gillnets operated along the Total coast (Pillai et al., 2000).Gill nets and lines are used all along the coast, but have different specifications in the north and south of Orissa (www.uaaodisha.org).details of drift gillnets used for fishing operations from mechanized gillnetters from Odisha are given Table 4. Table 4 : Details of drift gillnets operated from Mechanized gillnetters from Odisha Vernacular name Mesh sizes, mm Fleet Depth, m Target species length, m Bhetki 85 10,000 18 Hilsa Bahaljaal 95 12,000 16 Pomfrets,Hilsa Phasijalo 100 8000 15 Tuna,sword,dolphin fish Nakundajalo 110 6,500 15 Seerfishes,tunas chandijalo 80 1,500 15 Seerfishes i. Design details Gill nets for large pelagic fishes Gill nets for seerfishes and tunas are operated as drifting gear at the surface or in the column waters. Gillnet is generally held vertically by a buoyant float line at the top of the net and a lead line at the bottom. However, the large mesh polyamide (PA) multifilament twines were used drift gill nets for seerfishes and tunas operated from the mechanized boat are free of sinker line or even footrope. These are operated in column or surface depending on the swimming layer of the fish during different seasons. At times the float line is rigged in such a way that it remains below the surface by adjusting the buoy lines which are attached to the float line at regular intervals. Drift nets are usually operated during night-time. Large mesh sized gillnets, meant mainly for Hilsa and pomfrets, are used in the northern side of Odisha coast (Edwin, 2014). PA monofilament and multifilament twines were used throughout the Odisha coast for Hilsa, seerfish and tuna gill nets. Coloured multifilament yarns were used as netting material throughout the coast.green and red colours were commonly used. Yarn having specification of 210d 2 3 to 210d 12 3 were most commonly used according to the mesh size. PA monofilament of mesh size 0.50 to 1 mm diameter and selvedge meshes of PE of 1 to 4 mm diameter is used gillnets for shark. During December-January months, when comparatively larger specimens of seerfish occurred in the fishery, PA 2l0dx9x3 (Rtex 683) and 2l0dxl2x3 (Rtex 911) were used. The use of 210d 2 3, 2l0dx4x3 and 2l0dxl2x3 was observed at different coastal belts of Odisha. The mesh size ranged between 90 and 200 mm, however the most common are 90 and 160 mm. The fleet lengths of net ranged between 3900-9300m. PA multifilament twines were used throughout the coast for seer fish and tuna nets. The operation of large mesh drift gill nets, for high sea pelagic species is at 100-1200 m depth zones. The hanging coefficient of the gear varied between 0.45 and 0.6 in different regions. The net is free of footrope or sinkers for effective entangling. The hung depth of the

nets ranged from 10 to 18 m. Regional variations exists in hung depth of the gear. c) Operational details Mechanised vessels operating from Odisha operated deeper than their motorized counterparts. The depth of operation of mechanized crafts ranged between 100 and 1000 m and similar observations were reported by Akhilesh et al. (2012). Previously the operations of large mesh gillnets were limited to 100 m depth (Thomas, 2001). Larger vessels, with higher engine power and ice storage facilityconducted operations in distant and deeper waters.the drift gillnets are operated by fishermen from inboard engine fitted vessels with of 12-18 m L OA and having navigational and fish finding electronic instruments like GPS, Echosounder and VHF transceivers are used for navigation and fishing in the high seas of Odisha. During operation nets were freely allowed to drift along with the boat for 4-6 h during night time and one end of the net is tied to the vessel after shooting the net. Hauling is done manually. Indicator flag lights are attached to the two ends of the net during night operation. It helps fishermen to avoid heavy losses because their nets are damaged or cut loose by passing ships or other larger vessels (Pajot, 1980). After hauling the net, the catch is sorted species wise. In late 1990 s one to two weeks multi voyage fishing started for gillnet fishing (Thomas, 2001). Now this trip duration is increased changed and they are going for 20-30 day long trip to for high sea fishing in Odisha coast. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D) Volume XVI Issue I V ersion I Year 2016 311 Fig. 5 : Design of a typical of a typical HDPE drift gillnet operated in Odisha

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D) Volume XVI Issue V ersion I Year 2016 32 I Fig. 6 : Design detail of typical PA multifilament drift gillnet operated in Odisha d) Species composition The main targeted species are tuna Euthynnus affinis, seerfish (Scomberomorouscommerson ands. guttatus), Rays (Himantura bleekeri, H.uarnak)and shark (Carcharinus sorrah and Sphyrna lewini) and billfish Istiophorousplatypeterus, Barracudas,Sphyraena barracudaand other fishes like Ilisha elongata, Epinephelus chlorostigma, Pampus argentus, P. chinensis, Tenualos ailisha, Eleutheronema tetradactylum. Studies with the large mesh gillnets showed that, it is the effective fishing method for exploiting large pelagic fish species found in the high seas, which are not being caught by other fishing gears (Pravin et al., 2002). The main fishing season was from January to Marchand peak catch was observed during January.Pati and pati (1982), reported drift gillnets are the principal gear used in the coastal waters of Odish to catch hilsa, pomfrets, seerfish, marine catfishes, silver-

bars and sharks and minor quantity of horse mackerel, long-finned herring, shad, Indian salmon, serranids and sciaenids Polyamide multifilament is widely used for the fabrication of gillnets in India, which is gradually being replaced by HDPE in late 1990s (Pillai, 1989, Pravin et, al. 1998, Rao et al. 2002, and Thomas & Hridayanathan, 2002). Even though motorization of country crafts took place during 1986-87 periods in Orissa, the same was reflected in Puri district only in 1989. From 1991 onwards an increasing trend was observed in fishing by motorized crafts using gill nets and hooks &lines (Ammini, 2008). The Government of India (GOI) also states that the fishing operations done by vessels using winches and other mechanised system for fishing operations maybe stated as mechanised fishing. The fishing operations on the Orissa coast by these above mechanised vessels using gill nets is carried out without the use of winches or any mechanised system, and is totally manual in nature. Therefore it is only accurate to say that the mechanised vessels of these regions conduct non-mechanised fishing, which is not prohibited by the Orissa Marine Fisheries Regulation Act (OMFRA), 1981. This clause in the OMFRA is misused by the fisher people of Odisha to meet their objectives which leads to the mass mortality of the turtles. Clearly, the marine fisheries sector in Odisha deserves a special research attention for several reasons. First, it is a sector that provides employment to a large number of people, even if at a subsistence level. Second, the sector has witnessed a remarkable growth that need to be explained further. Thirdly, the sector has witnessed a remarkable technological advancement although substantial sections of the people drawing a living from it are still doing that with traditional and nonmechanised methods of capture. It is in this context that we seek to observe the labour market outcomes in the sector in Odisha. The information on design, structural parameters and operation of mechanised gillnetter and large mesh pelagic drift gillnets would serve as baseline data which would help future study. IV. Acknowledgment The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Agricultural Science Fund (NASF), for funding this study. They also thank Dr. C. N Ravishankar, Director, CIFT for the facilities provided and for his kind encouragement and guidance during the course of the study. Help and technical assistance from shri.v.pradhan, Technical staff, of CIFT greatly acknowledged. References Références Referencias 1. Akhilesh, K. V., Ganga, U., Pillai, N. G. K., Vivekanandan, E., Bineesh, K. K., RajoolShanis, C. P., & Manjebrayakath, H. 2011. Deep sea fishing for Chondrichthian resources and sustainability concerns-a case study from Southwest coast of India. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 40(3).pp 347-355. 2. Ammini, P.L., Lata L. Khambadkar, Sindhu Augustine, K (2008) A brief report on the marine fisheries of Puri, Orissa. Marine Fisheries Information Service T&E Ser., No. 195, 2008. 3. Chaidee, P., Darumas, N., Chamasont, O., Sada, M. N., Jayasinghe, R. P. K., Chinthaka, K. S. D.,. Sein A.W, Nalla, J and Thapanand-Chaidee, T. (2007) Marine Resource Surveys by Drift Gill Net in the Bay of Bengal. 4. CMFRI (2012) Marine fisheries census 2010 Part-I India, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries and Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin, 98 pp. 5. Edwin, L., Pravin, P., Madhu, V.R., Thomas, S.N., Remesan, M.P., Baiju, M.V., Ravi, R., Das, D.P.H., Boopendranath, M.R.and Meenakumari, B. (2014) Mechanised Marine Fishing Systems: India, Central Institute of Fisheries Technology,Kochi: 276 p. 6. Fyson, J. 1986. Design of Small Fishing Vessel Fishing News Books Ltd. 7. Nedelec, C. (1975) FAO Catalogue of Small Scale Fishing Gear, 191 p, Fishing News (Books) Ltd., Farnham, Surrey, England. 8. Pajot, G. (1980) Improvement of large mesh drift net for small scale fisheries of Sri Lanka, BOBP News No.93. 9. Pajot, G. (1993) Large pelagic fishing in India,BOBP News No. 51, pp 18-20. 10. Pillai, N.S., Boopendranath, M.R. and Kunjipalu, K.K. 1989. Studies on the Suitability of HDPE Material for Gill Nets, Fish. Technol., 26: 1-3. 11. Mahadevan Pillai, P.K. Balakrishnan, G, Varughese Phillpose and Rajendran, V (2000) An appraisal on the marine fishing craft and gear of the Indian coast. In Marine Research and Management(V.N. Pillai and N.G. Menon) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute. 12. Pravin, P., Remesan, M.P. and George Mathai,P. (1998) Gill net fishing in Gujarat. In: Advances and Priorities in Fisheries Technology, (Balachandran, K.K.,Iyer,T.S.G., Madhavan, P., Joseph, J., Perigreen, P.A., Raghunath, M.R., & Varghese, M.D.,Eds), pp 170-176, Society of Fisheries Technologists (India), Cochin. 13. Pravin, P., Saly N. Thomas, P. George Mathai, B. Meenakumari and M.P. Remesan (2009) Studies on Drift Gillnet Fishing at Agatti Island (Lakshadweep). Fishery Technology Vol. 46(1) pp: 7 14. 14. Rao, S. V. S, Rajeshwari, G. and Raghuprakash, R.(2002) Studies on the gillnets of Andhrapradesh,Fish.Technology 39:15-19. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D) Volume XVI Issue I V ersion I Year 2016 331

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( D) Volume XVI Issue V ersion I Year 2016 34 I 15. Silas, E. G. and Pillai, P.P. 1985. Indian tuna fishery developmentperspectives and management plan. Bull. Cent. Mar. Fish. Res. Inst., 36: 193-208. 16. Sreekrishna, Y. and Shenoy, L. (2001) Fishing Gear and Craft Technology, 242 p, Directorate of Information and Publication of Agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. 17. Thomas, S.N (2001). Gill nets of Kerala: A study on technologies and operational aspects, Ph.D Thesis., Cochin University of science and technology, Cochin. 18. Thomas, S.N. and Hridayanathan, C. (2002) Substitution of polyamide multifilament by polyethylene twisted monofilament in large mesh gill nets Fish Technol. 39 pp 100-106. 19. Thomas, S.N., Meenakumari, B., Pravin, P. and George Mathai, P. (2005) Gill nets in Marine Fisheries of India, 45 p. Monograph, ATIC, CIFT, Cochin. 20. Thomas, S.N (2010).Gilinet fishing in India.Coastal Fishery Resources of India, onservation and Sustainable Utilisation. 21. Pati.S. andpati D. K. (1982) The role of rainfall on the Hiilsa fishery along the Orilssa coast. Indian J. Fish., 19: 35-53.Vol 29, No 1 & 2. 22. Singh Tarun Kumar and Patnaik Shivani (2014). Marine Fisheries; Its Current Status, Sustainable Management and Socio-Economic Status of the Marine Fishers of Odisha, Through Indian Marine Policy: A Case Study.Research Journal of Animal, Veterinary and Fishery Sciences. Vol. 2(7), 10-19, July (2014). 23. Sivakami, S and Somy Kuriakose(2009) An appraisal of the marine fisheries of Orissa, India. Asian Fisheries Science, 2009. www.uaaodisha.org.

Global Journals Inc. (US) Guidelines Handbook 2016 www.globaljournals.org