NC Demographic Trends Through 2035

Similar documents
NC Demographic Trends Through 2035

Demographic Change in North Carolina

NC s Shifting Population: Growth, Decline, and Rebound

WHERE ARE ARIZONA DEMOGRAPHICS TAKING US? HOW GROWING SLOWER, OLDER AND MORE DIVERSE AFFECTS REAL ESTATE

Transportation 2040 Update: Travel Trends. Transportation Policy Board June 9, 2016

Population & Demographics

Boulder Economic Summit The Future of the Talent-Driven Economy

Developing Regional Solutions In Southeast Michigan

Future of Housing Trends and the Housing Market Demographic Waves in the Region and Future of Housing. Illinois Finance Forum January 25, 2019

North Carolina Competitiveness

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

Michigan Population Trends: The School Age Population

Competitiveness

Location Matters: Where America Is Moving

INTERSECTIONS. Metro Denver 2016 Economic Forecast January 2016

Summary of Travel Trends Findings from the 2017 NHTS. Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst Anthony Fucci, Westat

Nebraska Births Report: A look at births, fertility rates, and natural change

Planning for Economic and Fiscal Health

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

Missing Opportunities: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Twin Cities Metro in 2016

THE 2010 MSP REGION TRAVEL BEHAVIOR INVENTORY (TBI) REPORT HOME INTERVIEW SURVEY. A Summary of Resident Travel in the Twin Cities Region

National Community and Transportation Preferences Survey. September 2017

METRO Now. Transit Leader. One of only four urban. gain bus ridership in Purple and Green Lines. Red Line is one

Walkability. The Pathway to Atlanta s Future Growth April 19, 2017

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY:

The Case for New Trends in Travel

North Carolina Complete Streets Summit. Welcome and Opening Plenary

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Oakmont: Who are we?

North Carolina. Bicycle Crash Facts Prepared for

Report Overview Policy versus Performance: Directions for North Carolina s Largest Transit Systems

Houston and Tomball Economic and. Housing Outlook. recenter.tamu.edu. Dr. James P. Gaines Research Economist

Factors Associated with the Bicycle Commute Use of Newcomers: An analysis of the 70 largest U.S. Cities

Detroiters need to be able to conveniently and reliably get to work, school, church, stores, and parks.

Changing Commuting Patterns and Impacts on Planning & Infrastructure. William E. Frawley, AICP Texas A&M Transportation Institute October 3, 2013

Colorado Economic Update

The Wisconsin and Minnesota Economies: What can we learn from each other? Noah Williams

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey U.S. Metro Areas, 2015 July 23, 2015

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

2017 Nebraska Profile

Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity

MANITOBA'S ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY: A 2001 TO 2026 POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

Key Findings & Corridor Highlights

U.S. Course Openings & Closures

Demographic Characteristics and Trends of Bexar County and San Antonio, TX

Acknowledgements. Ms. Linda Banister Ms. Tracy With Mr. Hassan Shaheen Mr. Scott Johnston

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

MIDCOAST MAINE TRANSIT STUDY. In Association with: MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Roaring Fork and Colorado River Valleys Regional Travel Patterns Study. Transportation Analysis Zone Map of the Region

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Participation. Workers Compensation Insurance Seminar. May 22, Nick Beleiciks

Cleve Gaddis Gaddis Partners, RE/MAX Center & USA Management

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program

Joseph Von Nessen, Ph.D. Research Economist November 16, 2018

Travel Patterns and Characteristics

4 Ridership Growth Study

How Policy Drives Mode Choice in Children s Transportation to School

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

City of Jeffersonville Complete Streets Workshop

BID Strategy Group and Stakeholders Meeting. April 17, 2018

Travel Patterns 255, ,382279, , , , , Year

Community Social Profile Wellesley, Wilmot and Woolwich

DFW MULTIFAMILY TRENDS & OBSERVATIONS Q2 2017

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

Changing Demographics in the U.S. and the Impact on Congress

TR NEWS. Public Health and Transportation. Innovation, Intervention, and Improvements NUMBER 299 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 2015

Spring Time for Housing

Project Kickoff Meeting February 15, 2018

REPORT OF THE ENGINEERING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION

2014 Metro Transit Customer Survey Highlights

How Travel Demand Has Been Changing. Susan Handy Asilomar 2015

Appendix B: Benefit-Cost Analysis

2016 Texas Prosperity Conference The Barnhill Center Brenham, Texas August 26, Dr. James P. Gaines Chief Economist. recenter.tamu.

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

THE I-79 CORRIDOR. I-79 provides motorists with connections to the following major highways: I-80, PA 358, PA 965 and PA 208.

June 2015 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SNAPSHOT

SNCC Demographic Trends

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

MS Transportation Common Stop Placement Project

Longitudinal analysis of young Danes travel pattern.

I-20 East Transit Initiative. Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 9, :00-6:00 PM

Estimating Ridership of Rural Public Demand- Response Transit

SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL TOWNS: RESULTS AND LESSONS

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

APPENDIX A COUNTY-LEVEL HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS IN 2000

Reflections on our learning: active travel, transport and inequalities

Ranking Walkable Urbanism in America s Largest Metros

Connect 2045 The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the

recenter.tamu.edu Dr. James P. Gaines Research Economist Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University

Americans in Transit A Profile of Public Transit Passengers

Southwest Ohio Regional Economy in Context. Richard Stock, PhD. Business Research Group

Travel Patterns and Cycling opportunites

The North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy and Western Richmond Terrace 1 : The Forgotten Corridor

Transcription:

NC Demographic Trends Through 2035 Joint Appropriation Committee on Transportation February 21, 2017 Rebecca Tippett, PhD Director, Carolina Demography

July 1 Population (Millions) North Carolina s Total Population (July 1), 1990-2035 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 Year Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates, NCOSBM Projections

July 1 Population (Millions) North Carolina s Total Population (July 1), 1990-2035 14 12 10 Officially 9th most populous state as of 2014 8 6 4 2 0 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 Year Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau

July 1 Population (Millions) North Carolina s Total Population (July 1), 1990-2035 14 12 10 8 Officially 9th most populous state as of 2014 >10M in 2015 6 4 2 0 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 Year Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau

July 1 Population (Millions) North Carolina s Total Population (July 1), 1990-2035 14 12 10 8 Officially 9th most populous state as of 2014 >10M in 2015 6 4 2 0 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 Year Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, NC OSBM

July 1 Population (Millions) North Carolina s Total Population (July 1), 1990-2035 14 12.1M in 2035 12 10 8 Officially 9th most populous state as of 2014 >10M in 2015 6 4 2 0 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 Year Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, NC OSBM

66% of NC residents lived in an urban area in 2010 Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Population growth will be uneven across North Carolina Projected population growth, 2010-2035 Data Source: NC OSBM

Nearly all of the fastest growing counties are in major metro areas Projected population growth, 2010-2035 Data Source: NC OSBM

Many counties outside of major metros projected to lose population Projected population growth, 2010-2035 Data Source: NC OSBM

Almost all future NC growth projected to occur in urban areas Projected share of 2010-2035 state population growth for select metropolitan areas Triangle 34% Charlotte 34% Triad 10% Wilmington 7% Asheville 5% All Other Metros 10% No Metro Area 1% Data Source: NC OSBM

Two-thirds of NC growth projected to occur in Triangle or Charlotte Projected share of 2010-2035 state population growth for select metropolitan areas Triangle 34% Charlotte 34% Triad 10% Wilmington 7% Asheville 5% All Other Metros 10% No Metro Area 1% Data Source: NC OSBM

Observed growth more uneven than projected Population growth, 2010-2015 Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Observed growth suggests Triangle may outpace projections Share of state projected vs. observed growth for select metro areas Triangle 34% 40% Charlotte 34% 34% Triad 10% 10% Wilmington 7% 8% Asheville 5% 4% All Other Metros 5% 10% Projected (2010-35) No Metro Area -2% 1% Observed (2010-15) Data Sources: NC OSBM, U.S. Census Bureau

50% of jobs are in Southwest or North Central PZs Data Source: 2016 (Q2) QCEW

Concentration of jobs in urban centers drives population shifts Share of NC employment in Mecklenburg, Wake, and Durham, Q2 2006 vs. Q2 2016 2006 (Q2) 2016 (Q2) Data Source: QCEW Mecklenburg Wake Durham

Concentration of jobs in urban centers drives population shifts Share of NC employment in Mecklenburg, Wake, and Durham, Q2 2006 vs. Q2 2016 2006 (Q2) 2016 (Q2) 13.6% 10.7% 4.4% Data Source: QCEW Mecklenburg Wake Durham

Concentration of jobs in urban centers drives population shifts Share of NC employment in Mecklenburg, Wake, and Durham, Q2 2006 vs. Q2 2016 15.5% 2006 (Q2) 2016 (Q2) 13.6% 10.7% 12.4% 4.4% 4.6% Mecklenburg Wake Durham Data Source: QCEW

More than 40% of NC workers work in these 5 counties Net commuting patterns, 2009-2013 -100,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 Mecklenburg Wake Guilford Durham Residents who Work Elsewhere Resident Workers Non-Resident Workers Forsyth Data Source: 2009-2013 5-Year American Community Survey

More than 40% of NC workers work in these 5 counties Net commuting patterns, 2009-2013 -100,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 Mecklenburg Wake Guilford Durham Residents who Work Elsewhere Resident Workers Non-Resident Workers Forsyth Data Source: 2009-2013 5-Year American Community Survey

More than 40% of NC workers work in these 5 counties Net commuting patterns, 2009-2013 -100,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 Mecklenburg Wake Guilford Durham Residents who Work Elsewhere Resident Workers Non-Resident Workers Forsyth Data Source: 2009-2013 5-Year American Community Survey

More than 40% of NC workers work in these 5 counties Net commuting patterns, 2009-2013 -100,000 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 Mecklenburg Wake Guilford Durham Residents who Work Elsewhere Resident Workers Non-Resident Workers Forsyth Data Source: 2009-2013 5-Year American Community Survey

Average commute to work: 24 minutes Data Source: 2015 American Community Survey

Non-car commuting (among 4.5 million workers) 228,000 work at home 50,000 public transit 89,000 bike or walk Data Source: 2015 American Community Survey

Nearly half of state s 1.9M new residents by 2035 will be 65+ Projected NC population growth by age, 2017-2035 910,000 459,000 317,000 218,000 Data Source: NC OSBM Under 18 18 to 34 35 to 64 65+

By 2035, more than 1 in 5 NC residents will be 65 or older Projected population share 65+, NC vs. US, 2010-2035 Population Proportion 65+ 25% US NC 20% 21.4% 20.7% 15% 10% 13% 5% 0% 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, NC OSBM Year

41 counties projected to have fewer children by 2035 Counties with projected declines in child population (0-17), 2017-2035 Data Source: NC OSBM

47 counties projected to have fewer young adults by 2035 Counties with projected declines in young adult population (18-34), 2017-2035 Data Source: NC OSBM

58 counties projected to have fewer working age adults by 2035 Counties with projected declines in prime working age adult population (35-64), 2017-2035 Data Source: NC OSBM

Only one county projected to have fewer older adults by 2035 Counties with projected declines in older adult population (65+), 2017-2035 Data Source: NC OSBM

Proportion of 18+ Population 2017 marks first year Millennial adults will outnumber Boomers Generational composition of North Carolina's 18+ population, 2010-2035 45% 40% 35% Boomers (1946-1964) 31% Millennial in 2017 Millennial (1982-2004) 30% 25% Gen X (1965-1981) 20% 15% Silent (1928-1945) 10% Gen Z (2005- ) 5% Greatest ( -1927) 0% 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Data Source: NC OSBM Year

Housing Unit Demand 2017-2035 +982K households +708K homeowners Source: Carolina Demography projections using ACS, CPS, and NC OSBM data

Presence of vacation homes also impacts infrastructure demands Proportion of county housing units for seasonal use, 2010 Data Source: 2010 Census

Increases in vacation homes concentrated in west, southeast Vacation home change by NC census tract, 2000 to 2010 Loss of 100 or more 5 to 99-99 to -5-4 to 4 100 to 249 250 or more Data Source: Carolina Demography

We help organizations make data-driven decisions. DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH AND CONSULTING Contact us: demography@unc.edu (919) 962-6151 Learn more: http://demography.cpc.unc.edu @ncdemography