Rio 2016 Olympic Games Men s Rugby Sevens Game Analysis Report

Rio 2016 Olympic Games Men s Rugby Sevens Game Analysis Report World Rugby Game Analysis

COMMENTARY The Rio 2016 Olympic Games, which saw the reintroduction of rugby to the Games after a gap of 92 years, provided the opportunity for rugby to display all those features of the game that make rugby sevens such a compelling sport. In addition to the skill, pace and excitement which are characteristics of the game, the competition at the Rio Olympic Games showed to the sporting world the elements of the game that gives it such a universal appeal. It showed that smaller countries could compete on the world stage. It showed that it is possible for a team to produce a unique interpretation of the game that reflects their particular skills, temperament and tradition. It shows that there is more than one way in which the game can be played. It showed that what happens in 15s rugby does not automatically transfer to rugby sevens. The men s competition saw Fiji secure the first men s sevens Olympic gold medal with Great Britain and South Africa winning silver and bronze respectively. The competition showed that the game of Rugby Sevens is highly competitive and often unpredictable and while the winner in Rio was Fiji, the number one seeded team, Great Britain secured the silver medal while being seeded in fourth, while Japan finished fourth from a seeding of tenth. New Zealand who were seeded third, finished fifth, while Australia finished eighth when seeded fifth and USA failed to progress to the medal knockout stages despite a seeding of sixth. Teams were seeded by their aggregate performance on the HSBC World Rugby Sevens Series in 2014-15 and 2015-16 and drawn into pools for the competition based on their seeding. The competition s seeding and final rankings are presented below. Olympic Ranking World Series Seeding Team 1 1 Fiji 2 4 Great Britain 3 2 South Africa 4 10 Japan 5 3 New Zealand 6 7 Argentina 7 8 France 8 5 Australia 9 6 USA 10 11 Spain 11 9 Kenya 12 12 Brazil 2 160818PD

Further indication of the competitiveness of the event can be seen in the comparison of the scoring margins of the medal quarter-finals and semi-finals in the Olympic Games and the Cup quarter-finals and semi-finals in 2015-16 HSBC World Rugby Sevens Series. QF/SF Scoring Margin 5pts or less 6pts or more Rio 2016 Olympics 67% 33% 2015-16 SWS 33% 67% Of the six Medal Quarter-Final and Semi-Final matches in the Olympic Games, 67 per cent were won by a margin of five points or fewer. In contrast, of the sixty Cup Quarter-Final and Semi-Final on the series, just 33 per cent were won by a margin of five points or fewer. Overall, 41 per cent of all matches in the Olympic Games were won by a margin of five points or fewer, compared to 32 per cent on the series. An intriguing element in rugby sevens is the opportunity it provides to the smaller rugby nations to compete at an elite level on the international stage and achieve significant success. This can be seen by comparing the final Rio 2016 rankings with the World Rugby Rankings (15s) in August 2016, which shows that dominance in the 15s game is not necessarily guaranteed in rugby sevens. This was graphically illustrated in Rio where, as mentioned earlier, New Zealand and Australia, the two finalists at Rugby World Cup 2015, and who dominated that competition, failed to progress beyond the quarter-finals. Team Rugby Sevens Olympic Games Ranking 15s World Rugby Rankings Fiji 1 11 Great Britain 2 2* South Africa 3 4 Japan 4 12 New Zealand 5 1 Argentina 6 8 France 7 9 Australia 8 3 USA 9 16 Spain 10 23 Kenya 11 22 Brazil 12 29 *England is used to represent Great Britain in the 15s World Rugby Rankings A further feature of rugby sevens is that there are several approaches that can be taken in how to play the game and achieve success. This was very evident in the comparison of the style of play of the gold medal match participants Fiji and Great Britain. Fiji s strategy, for example, was to avoid contact, and distribute and retain the ball with the result that over the competition. They obtained 20 per cent more possession than Great Britain. They made over 40 per cent more passes than Great Britain. 160818PD 3

They rucked and mauled 40 per cent fewer times than Great Britain. They retained possession in 93 per cent of their rucks and mauls whereas Great Britain retained possession in only 74 per cent of theirs. They were 50 per cent more successful then Great Britain in turning over their opponents rucks and mauls. They kicked the ball half as often as Great Britain. The finalists also illustrated how success is not the result of a simple universal playing formula. In contrast to Fiji, Great Britain s game was heavily based on a well-organised and committed defence which is illustrated in their unbeaten journey to the final. They conceded more tries than they scored, conceding 15 and scoring 14. (Fiji scored 26 tries and conceded only 10). They scored more tries than their opposition in only two out of their five victories. (Fiji scored more tries than their opposition in all of their matches). In those victories, their average winning margin was seven, with three of those matches being won by just two points (Fiji had an average margin of 16 points). Japan were a surprising success in Rio, finishing fourth despite entering the competition seeded 10th. The main differences in their performance in Rio compared to that on the world series centred around a particular strategic approach which recognised the importance of retaining possession and playing at a high tempo. The result was that: Japan won more possession than any other team. They also played at pace with the third-highest passing rate and the fourth-highest rucking rate. They kicked the least just twice in the whole competition. It was the final, however, which epitomised the appeal of rugby sevens. This was a match between Fiji, with a playing population of 65,980 players in a country of 899,277 inhabitants, playing against Great Britain, with a playing population of 463,096 players in a state of 65,238,727 inhabitants, where the smaller country produced a performance of such pace, skill and strength that it could constitute a benchmark for the game of sevens. In that match: Five tries were scored in the first half. The half-time score was 29 0, the game ending 43 7. In the first half, Great Britain were restricted to just 51 seconds of possession. Great Britain only had the ball in their possession on two occasions. In the entire game the Fijian players were only tackled twice once in each half. The game was a fitting finale to what was a memorable tournament. 4 160818PD

The following report is a quantitative review of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games men s rugby sevens competition. It brings together the relevant data relating each team s performance in the competition. The report has several objectives: To provide a profile of how the game of sevens was played at Rio 2016 Olympic Games. To provide a profile of each participating team s performance in the competition. To provide an instrument to compare the development of the game from the series to the Olympic Games. To present the relative performance of each participating team in all aspects of the game, enabling a comparison in performance between teams. To identify alternative strategies in performance adopted in certain areas of game play by various teams. In summary, the report comprises an analysis of all aspects of play together with the approach and performance of all the participating teams. For questions concerning any of the Rio 2016 Olympics Men s Rugby Sevens Game Analysis Statistical Report, please contact: Rhys Jones (World Rugby Game Analysis Manager) rhys.jones@worldrugby.org Phil Dunne (World Rugby Sevens Game Analyst) phil.dunne@worldrugby.org 160818PD 5

RIO 2016 OLYMPIC GAMES FACTS Scoring An average of 32.4 points were scored per game Seventy-nine per cent of the points scored came from tries with an average of 5.2 tries scored per match A try was scored every 84 seconds of possession The winning team scored the most tries in 28 or 82 per cent of matches Conversion success was 65 per cent and one penalty goal was successfully kicked A third of tries came from penalty or free-kick possession, while a fifth came from turnover possession Sixty-four per cent of tries contained no ruck or maul in the build-up play, while 58 per cent contained three or fewer passes Sixty-two per cent of possessions that entered into the opposition s 22m area resulted in a try The referee video review (RVR) was used a total of nine times with 56 per cent of referrals resulting in a try being awarded Open play Ball in play time averaged 52 per cent or seven minutes and 14 seconds per match A pass was made once every 6.6 seconds of possession, resulting in an average of 66 passes being made per match Fourteen per cent of phases in play, or one every seven, contained five or more passes, while 30 per cent contained just one pass There was an average of 17 rucks and mauls per game with 84 per cent being retained Sixty-nine per cent of all rucks and mauls were located between both 22m lines An average of 2.8 kicks occurred per game Set piece Sixty-two per cent of all restarts kicked were contestable Possession was retained in 28 per cent of contestable restart kicks Scrum success rate was 98 per cent Lineout success rate was 79 per cent Discipline An average of 7.4 penalties and free-kicks were awarded per match Sixty-seven per cent of all penalties were awarded at the breakdown Sixty-four per cent of penalties awarded at the breakdown were against the defending team A total of 17 yellow cards were given Seventy-six per cent of cards shown were for foul play offences 6 160818PD

OLYMPIC GAMES AND SEVENS WORLD SERIES COMPARISON Overall, there were differences in the shape of the game in Rio compared to the 2015-16 series in the following areas: The frequency of tries scored was significantly reduced. A try was scored every 84 seconds of play in Rio compared to every 71 seconds of play in the 2015-16 series. The time the ball was in play was significantly increased. Ball-in-play percentage was 52 per cent in Rio compared to 49 per cent in the 2015-16 series. The contest at the breakdown was reduced. Ruck and maul retention was 84 per cent in Rio compared to 80 per cent in the 2015-16 series. The restart set-piece was less contested. Restarts were contested 62 per cent of the time in Rio compared 73 per cent in the series. Possession was retained in 26 per cent of these restarts in Rio compared to 36 per cent in 2015-16. The rate of infringements increased. An average of 7.4 penalties and free-kicks were awarded per match in Rio compared to 6.6 per match in the series. 2016 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 Olympics SWS SWS SWS SWS SWS MATCHES 34 450 405 405 392 392 SCORING POINTS (average per game) 32.4 36.6 36.4 33 33 34 TRIES (average per game) 5.2 5.8 5.8 5.2 5.4 5.4 TRY SCORING RATE (rate) 1 every 84s 1 every 71s 1 every 73s 1 every 83s 1 every 80s 1 every 79s CONVERSION SUCCESS (%) 65% 64% 65% 65% 63% 62% PENALTY / DROP GOALS (total) 1 7 10 7 18 11 MATCH WON by scoring most tries (%) 82% 88% 87% 91% 85% 88% SOURCE OF TRIES - pens/fks (%) 33% 33% 32% 34% 33% 33% ORIGIN OF TRIES - own half (%) 39% 43% 42% 40% 44% 44% TRY BUILD UP no rucks/mauls (%) 64% 62% 64% 67% 62% 70% TRY BUILD UP - 3 or fewer passes (%) 58% 57% 57% 60% 57% 56% ACTIVITY BALL IN PLAY (%) 52% 49% 50% 51% 51% 51% PASSES (average per game) 66 64 64.1 64 66 68 5+ PASSING MOVEMENTS (rate) 1 in 7 1 in 7.3 1 in 8 1 in 8 1 in 8 1 in 7.7 RUCKS/MAULS (average per game) 17 16.4 17.2 17 17 18 RUCK/MAUL RETENTION (%) 84% 80% 80% 79% 81% 84% KICKS (average per game) 2.8 2.0 2.3 2.8 2.6 2.4 SET PIECE CONTESTABLE RESTARTS (%) 62% 73% 72% 70% 71% 70% CONTESTABLE RESTARTS REGAINED (%) 28% 36% 34% 36% 36% 33% RESTART ERRORS (rate) 1 in 15.3 1 in 15 1 in 13.3 1 in 16 1 in 15 17 SCRUMS (average per game) 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.6 2.8 4 SCRUMS possession retained (%) 98% 96% 96% 96% 94% 94% LINEOUTS (average per game) 3 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.4 2 LINEOUTS possession retained (%) 79% 80% 79% 79% 77% 74% QUICK THROWS (rate) 1 in 50 1 in 19.8 1 in 17 1 in 13 1 in 9.5 1 in 13 PENALTIES/FREE-KICKS AND CARDS PENALTIES (average per game) 7.4 6.6 6.2 6.8 6.2 6 CARDS (YC + RC total) 17 150 + 4 142 + 2 113 + 3 119 + 4 93 + 4 160818PD 7

SCORING AND CONCEDING TRIES The average number of points scored in a match was 32. The average number of points scored/conceded by a team was 16 but, not surprisingly, there were major variations around this average. Fiji scored an average of 26.7 points and conceded an average of 10.7 points, whereas Brazil scored an average of 4.8 points and conceded an average of 29 points. Overall there was a try scored every 84 seconds of play. Try-scoring rates show how effective each team was in scoring points in relation to the possession that they obtained, and try conceding rates show how effective each team was in restricting points in relation to the possession that their opponents obtained. The below tables give the relevant figures for each participating team. South Africa had the best try-scoring and conceding rate, scoring a try every 55 seconds of their own possession and conceding a try every 219 seconds of opposition possession. Avg points scored Avg points conceded Avg tries scored Avg tries conceded Try scoring rate Try conceding rate FJI 26.7 10.7 4.3 1.7 RSA 55 RSA 219 RSA 22.7 6.3 3.7 1.0 FJI 57 FJI 118 USA 21.4 13.0 3.4 2.2 USA 70 NZL 117 NZL 17.8 14.2 2.8 2.2 NZL 78 ARG 102 ARG 17.0 13.0 2.7 2.0 AUS 84 USA 97 AVG 16.2 16.2 2.6 2.6 AVG 84 GBR 96 FRA 15.8 15.2 2.3 2.5 GBR 87 AVG 84 JPN 15.8 20.2 2.5 3.2 ARG 93 FRA 82 GBR 15.3 15.5 2.3 2.5 FRA 97 KEN 75 AUS 14.7 18.0 2.3 2.8 JPN 99 AUS 74 KEN 11.0 20.8 1.8 3.2 KEN 104 JPN 59 ESP 8.6 22.4 1.4 3.6 ESP 148 ESP 57 BRA 4.8 29.0 0.8 4.6 BRA 216 BRA 51 8 160818PD

CONVERSIONS The overall conversion success rate was 65 per cent. There were noticeable variations in the percentage success rates as seen in the below table. Because of the relatively few tries scored by some teams, applying percentages can only be regarded as indicative. In addition, the location of the score can be a significant factor in achieving a successful conversion. The below table shows the success rate of all participating teams, with France having the highest conversion success rate with 79 per cent and Brazil the lowest with 50 per cent. There was one penalty goal. Conversion Success (%) FRA 79% GBR 79% ARG 69% JPN 67% NZL 65% USA 65% AVG 65% AUS 64% RSA 59% FJI 58% ESP 57% KEN 56% BRA 50% TRY SCORING There were 175 tries scored, giving an average of 5.2 per match. Fiji scored an average of 4.3 tries per match and conceded an average of 1.7 tries. The average number of tries scored and conceded by all participating teams is shown in the table on the previous page. IMPACT OF TRIES With one penalty goal and a conversion success rate of 65 per cent, it was inevitable that tries would determine the winning team in the vast majority of matches and this proved to be the case. Of the 34 matches, 28 (or 82 per cent) were won by the team scoring the most tries, while in six (or 18 per cent) tries were equal. In those six matches, all were won by the team that scored the more conversions. There were no draws. 160818PD 9

SOURCE OF TRIES Teams obtained possession of the ball prior to scoring a try from a variety of sources which are presented in the table below. It can be seen that the most fruitful source of tries was penalties and free-kicks (33 per cent). The table shows the importance of turnovers, with 20 per cent of all tries scored from possession originating at a turnover. The following table shows the possession source of tries scored by each team. The team that scored the highest proportion of their tries from penalties/free-kicks were Australia and France, from turnovers South Africa and from restarts Kenya. Penalty & Free-Kick Lineout Turnover Kick Receipt Scrum Restart AUS 50% 0% 14% 0% 29% 7% FRA 50% 7% 7% 14% 21% 0% GBR 43% 0% 29% 0% 14% 14% FJI 42% 8% 19% 4% 4% 23% JPN 40% 33% 0% 0% 13% 13% ARG 38% 6% 13% 6% 25% 13% AVG 33% 14% 20% 4% 16% 13% NZL 29% 29% 18% 0% 24% 0% ESP 29% 29% 0% 14% 29% 0% USA 24% 24% 24% 0% 18% 12% RSA 18% 14% 50% 0% 0% 18% BRA 0% 25% 50% 0% 25% 0% KEN 0% 11% 11% 22% 22% 33% ORIGIN OF TRIES Of all the tries scored, 43 per cent originated in the try-scoring team s own half and 57 per cent in the opposition half. The team that scored the highest proportion of tries from their own half was Spain. Own Half Halfway to 10m 10m to 22m 22m to Tryline ESP 57% 0% 29% 14% KEN 56% 11% 22% 11% USA 53% 6% 24% 18% RSA 50% 18% 23% 9% ARG 44% 13% 6% 38% AVG 39% 12% 21% 27% FJI 38% 8% 38% 15% GBR 36% 36% 7% 21% NZL 35% 0% 29% 35% AUS 29% 14% 21% 36% FRA 29% 29% 14% 29% BRA 25% 0% 25% 50% JPN 20% 0% 7% 73% 10 160818PD

BUILD-UP TO TRIES The table below shows how many rucks/mauls and number of passes preceded each try in the competition. The table shows that 64 per cent of tries were preceded by no ruck or maul and that 58 per cent of tries were preceded by three or fewer passes. Ruck/maul in try build-up % Cumulative None 64% 64% 1 ruck/maul 17% 81% 2+ ruck/mauls 19% 100% Passes in try build-up % Cumulative None 11% 11% 1-3 passes 47% 58% 4-6 passes 21% 79% 7+ passes 21% 100% The percentage of tries both scored and conceded with no rucks in the build-up and the percentage of tries scored with three or fewer passes are in the table below. It shows, 81 per cent of tries scored by Fiji contained no rucks in the build-up, while 80 per cent of tries conceded by Fiji contained no rucks. It also shows that 75 per cent of tries scored by Brazil contained three or fewer passes in the build-up, compared with 43 per cent by Spain and Great Britain. Thirty-seven per cent of tries conceded by Japan contained three or fewer passes in the build-up. % of tries with no ruck or maul % of tries with < 3 passes Tries scored Tries conceded Tries scored Tries conceded BRA 100% RSA 33% BRA 75% JPN 37% FJI 81% NZL 46% JPN 73% KEN 44% AUS 71% FRA 47% KEN 67% NZL 46% GBR 71% KEN 56% USA 65% RSA 50% USA 71% USA 64% AUS 64% FRA 53% JPN 67% AVG 64% ARG 63% GBR 53% FRA 64% AUS 65% AVG 58% AVG 58% AVG 64% ARG 67% FRA 57% USA 64% ARG 63% JPN 68% RSA 55% AUS 65% RSA 55% ESP 72% FJI 54% ARG 67% NZL 53% GBR 73% NZL 47% ESP 67% KEN 44% BRA 74% GBR 43% FJI 70% ESP 14% FJI 80% ESP 43% BRA 74% 160818PD 11

ENTRY INTO OPPOSITION 22M AREA Of all team possessions, an average of 4.1 possessions per match resulted in entering the opposition s 22m area. Of these entries, an average of 62 per cent resulted in a try being scored from the possession. Fiji had an average of 5.5 possessions per match that entered the opposition s 22m area, with 79 per cent of Fiji s entries resulting in a try being scored. South Africa s opposition had an average of 1.5 possessions that entered their 22m area, with 67 per cent of these entries resulting in a try being scored. Avg 22m Entries Opposition 22m Tries scored per entry (%) Avg 22m Entries Own 22m Tries scored per entry (%) FJI 5.5 79% RSA 1.5 67% ARG 5.0 53% ARG 3.2 63% JPN 5.0 50% FJI 3.2 53% AUS 4.8 48% AUS 4.0 71% RSA 4.7 79% FRA 4.0 63% USA 4.4 77% JPN 4.0 79% NZL 4.3 66% AVG 4.1 62% AVG 4.1 62% NZL 4.2 52% FRA 4.0 58% GBR 4.5 56% KEN 3.4 53% USA 4.6 48% GBR 3.2 74% KEN 5.2 62% BRA 2.8 29% BRA 5.8 79% ESP 1.6 88% ESP 6.2 58% REFEREE VIDEO REVIEW The referee video review (RVR) may be used if the referee and the assistants are unsure as to whether a try has been scored or not. The referee may only refer to the RVR in instances in the act of scoring such as ball grounding in-goal, touch in-goal or being made dead, a player in touch in the act of scoring and foul play in-goal in the act of scoring. The RVR was referred to on nine occasions with a try being awarded in five or 56 per cent of these referrals. RVR total Try No try 9 5 4 56% 44% 12 160818PD

BALL IN PLAY AND POSSESSION The ball was in play for an average of 52 per cent of available time with each team averaging 3mins 37secs possession per match. There was a considerable variation in the amount of possession achieved by the various teams. This is shown in the below table, which gives the average possession times and proportion of possession percentages achieved by each team and their opponents in the competition. As seen in the table, there were some measurable differences. Argentina, Fiji and Japan averaged the highest possession per match with 4m 08s, with Brazil only averaging 2m 52s. Japan achieved the highest proportion of possession with 57 per cent and Brazil had the least proportion of possession with 42 per cent. Own avg possession time % Opp avg possession time % ARG 04:08 55% 03:25 45% FJI 04:08 56% 03:17 44% JPN 04:08 57% 03:08 43% USA 03:58 53% 03:33 47% FRA 03:47 53% 03:25 47% NZL 03:42 47% 04:13 53% AVG 03:37 50% 03:37 50% ESP 03:28 50% 03:25 50% GBR 03:24 46% 04:01 54% RSA 03:22 48% 03:38 52% AUS 03:15 48% 03:30 52% KEN 03:06 44% 04:01 56% BRA 02:52 42% 03:55 58% 160818PD 13

PASSING The average number of passes in a match was 66. The average number of passes by a team was 33 but, not surprisingly, there were major variations around this average. The next table shows major differences between the teams. Such differences can, however, partly be explained by the amount of possession obtained by each team more possession typically means more passes. If possession is taken into account, therefore, the rate at which each country passed the ball can be far closer. Fiji had the highest passing rates (passes per minute of possession) and Kenya the lowest. Passing activity can also be measured as the number of passes made per phase (or movement) of play. The frequency at which a team completes five or more passes in one phase or movement of play is reported in the table below. A 5+ passing movement occurred on average once every seven phases of play. Fiji had the highest frequency of 5+ passing movements and Kenya had the lowest, completing a 5+ passing movement only once every 25.5 movements. Passing rate Avg passes Movements with 5+ passes FJI 5.8 43 FJI 4.1 ARG 5.9 41.8 JPN 4.5 JPN 6.2 39.8 ARG 5.2 ESP 6.3 32.8 GBR 5.7 BRA 6.4 27 USA 6.2 USA 6.6 35.8 ESP 6.4 AVG 6.6 32.9 BRA 6.7 AUS 6.9 28.2 AVG 7.0 GBR 6.9 29.7 NZL 9.5 FRA 7 32.5 RSA 10.0 RSA 7.1 28.5 FRA 11.1 NZL 7.3 30.5 AUS 18.5 KEN 8.2 22.6 KEN 25.5 14 160818PD

RUCKS AND MAULS The average number of rucks and mauls in a game was 17. The average number of ruck and mauls by a team was 8.5 but, not surprisingly, there were major variations around this average. The table below shows major differences in the average number of rucks created by each team. Some of this can be explained by the amount of possession obtained by each team. If this is taken into account, the rate at which each country rucked is far closer, as also shown in the table. This expresses rucks as rucks per minute possession. Spain had the highest rucking rate and Fiji the lowest. Rucking rate Avg rucks ESP 17.3 12 AUS 19.8 9.8 NZL 20.8 10.7 JPN 22.8 10.8 FRA 23.9 9.5 KEN 23.9 7.8 RSA 25.2 8 BRA 25.4 6.8 AVG 25.6 8.5 USA 25.8 9.2 ARG 33 7.5 GBR 35.9 5.7 FJI 55 4.5 160818PD 15

RUCK SUCCESS At the breakdown, the team taking in the ball retained possession by either winning the ball or being awarded a penalty on 84 per cent of occasions. The percentage success rate of each team in attack and defence is shown below. In attack Fiji had the highest success at their own rucks, Great Britain the least. In defence, Fiji had the highest success at their opponents rucks winning 28 per cent of breakdowns, however South Africa won the highest average amount with an average of 2.8 rucks won per match. USA were the least successful team at their opposition s breakdown. % Success own rucks Avg own rucks won % Success opp rucks Avg opp rucks won FJI 93% 4.2 FJI 28% 2.2 BRA 91% 6.2 AUS 24% 2 JPN 90% 9.7 RSA 24% 2.8 AUS 87% 8.5 BRA 19% 1 ESP 85% 10.2 GBR 19% 1.8 RSA 84% 6.7 NZL 17% 1.8 AVG 84% 7.1 AVG 16% 1.4 ARG 83% 6.2 ARG 16% 1.2 NZL 81% 8.7 JPN 14% 0.8 FRA 81% 7.7 FRA 11% 1.2 KEN 77% 6 ESP 8% 0.6 USA 76% 7 KEN 8% 0.6 GBR 74% 4.2 USA 7% 0.6 RUCK LOCATION The location where a ruck occurs was categorised into four areas of the pitch: from a team s own try line to their 22m, from a team s 22m to the halfway line, from the halfway line to the opposition s 22m and from the opposition s 22m to the try-line. The percentage of rucks within the categorised pitch areas in attack and defence for each team are presented in the tables on the next page. Sixty-nine per cent of all rucks occur between the 22m areas with 11 per cent between a team s try line and 22m, and 20 per cent between the opposition s 22m and try line. In attack, Japan had the highest percentage of rucks inside the opposition s 22m, while Spain had the highest percentage of rucks between both 22m areas. In defence, South Africa had the lowest percentage of rucks inside their own 22m, while Australia had the lowest percentage between both 22m areas. 16 160818PD

Attacking Own Try-22m 22m-Halfway Halfway-22m 22m-Opp Try Total JPN 3% 40% 26% 31% 65 NZL 8% 41% 27% 25% 64 ESP 13% 50% 32% 5% 60 AUS 3% 36% 34% 27% 59 FRA 14% 26% 39% 21% 57 AVG 11% 37% 32% 20% 578 RSA 6% 42% 29% 23% 48 USA 4% 46% 33% 17% 46 ARG 11% 22% 42% 24% 45 KEN 15% 33% 31% 21% 39 BRA 21% 32% 32% 15% 34 GBR 29% 29% 29% 12% 34 FJI 11% 33% 41% 15% 27 Defending Own Try-22m 22m-Halfway Halfway-22m 22m-Opp Try Total RSA 9% 29% 52% 10% 69 FRA 24% 21% 48% 8% 63 NZL 19% 37% 33% 11% 63 GBR 35% 39% 19% 7% 57 AUS 16% 33% 24% 27% 49 AVG 20% 32% 37% 11% 578 FJI 11% 34% 51% 4% 47 USA 20% 39% 37% 4% 46 ARG 16% 31% 33% 20% 45 KEN 30% 38% 30% 3% 40 ESP 42% 47% 11% 0% 38 JPN 11% 9% 54% 26% 35 BRA 15% 35% 42% 8% 26 160818PD 17

KICKING Kicks comprises of all kicks made in general play including punts, chips, ground (i.e. football kick) and grubber kicks. The average number of kicks in a game was 2.8. As can be seen in the table, Great Britain were most likely to kick and Japan the least. Avg own kicks % Avg opp kicks GBR 3 72% 1.2 28% FRA 2.7 70% 1.2 30% ARG 1.7 45% 2 55% ESP 1.4 100% 0 0% AVG 1.4 50% 1.4 50% FJI 1.3 62% 0.8 38% AUS 1.2 37% 2 63% KEN 1.2 35% 2.2 65% RSA 1.2 39% 1.8 61% NZL 1 30% 2.3 70% BRA 0.8 44% 1 56% USA 0.4 50% 0.4 50% JPN 0.3 22% 1.2 78% % 18 160818PD

RESTARTS Restarts are the most common set pieces in rugby sevens with an average of 6.2 restarts per match. Restarts have been classified into two types, contestable and non-contestable: 62 per cent of restarts kicks were contestable (kicked short) and 38 per cent were non-contestable (kicked long). Retention rates reflect the number of times that possession was retained at contestable restarts. They varied considerably. Overall, of all contestable restarts, the kicking team regained 28 per cent of restarts. Spain kicked the highest percentage of contestable restarts and France were the most successful in regaining their own short restarts. New Zealand kicked non-contestable restarts the most, while South Africa, Brazil and Japan did not regain possession once from their own short restarts. There was a restart error once in every 15.3 restarts. France and USA made a restart error one in every 8.5 attempts while Australia, Fiji and Kenya did not make a restart error. % Contestable restarts % Restarts regained Restart errors (rate) ESP 100% FRA 54% NZL 22.0 FJI 87% ESP 50% JPN 18.0 GBR 83% AUS 44% AVG 15.3 KEN 77% ARG 33% RSA 12.0 FRA 76% KEN 30% ESP 10.0 USA 71% AVG 28% ARG 9.0 ARG 67% FJI 27% BRA 9.0 AVG 62% USA 25% GBR 9.0 AUS 50% GBR 20% FRA 8.5 RSA 42% NZL 17% USA 8.5 BRA 33% BRA 0% AUS 0.0 JPN 33% JPN 0% FJI 0.0 NZL 27% RSA 0% KEN 0.0 160818PD 19

SCRUMS AND LINEOUTS Overall scrum success was 98 per cent and lineout success was 79 per cent. The following table shows the success rates for each team on their own put-in/throw-in. Ten teams won 100 per cent of their scrum put-ins, while four teams won 100 per cent of their lineout throw-ins. Scrum success % Lineout success % ARG 100% FRA 100% AUS 100% NZL 100% FJI 100% ESP 100% FRA 100% USA 100% GBR 100% ARG 85% JPN 100% GBR 83% KEN 100% FJI 80% NZL 100% AVG 79% RSA 100% JPN 75% USA 100% KEN 67% AVG 98% RSA 62% ESP 91% BRA 57% BRA 86% AUS 33% 20 160818PD

PENALTIES, FREE-KICKS AND CARDS The average number of penalties and free-kicks per game was 7.4. What needs to be noted is that absolute statistics and averages do not necessarily reflect the true degree of discipline or ill-discipline of a particular team. The number of penalties can, for example, vary from match to match. Some referees penalise more than others. A better and probably more accurate indicator, therefore, is the proportion of penalties conceded by a team in all their matches compared with their opponents. Each team s proportion for and against can be seen in the below table, together with the totals. Australia were penalised the least and New Zealand the most. Of all penalties awarded, 67 per cent were awarded at the breakdown, with 64 per cent of the penalties against the defending team and 36 per cent against the attacking team. New Zealand and Kenya were the most penalised team at the breakdown, while Brazil were the least penalised. Avg Pen/FK against Avg tackle/ruck Pen against % PK against % PK for Cards NZL 5.3 3.0 46% 54% 1 USA 4.8 2.6 43% 57% 1 KEN 4.4 3.0 33% 67% 2 GBR 4.3 1.5 46% 54% 1 ESP 3.8 2.6 32% 68% 1 ARG 3.7 1.8 52% 48% 5 AVG 3.7 1.9 50% 50% 17 FJI 3.5 1.2 52% 48% 2 RSA 3.5 1.9 43% 57% 0 JPN 3 1.8 61% 39% 2 BRA 2.8 0.4 60% 40% 2 FRA 2.7 1.5 62% 38% 0 AUS 2.5 1.7 63% 38% 0 160818PD 21