SC Chile s Annual report Subsecretaría de Pesca y Acuicultura

Similar documents
1 st Meeting of the Scientific Committee

SWG JACK MACKEREL FISHERY IN CHILE

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc21 Chinese Taipei s Annual Report

SC China s Annual report Part II: The Squid Jigging Fishery Gang Li, Xinjun Chen and Bilin Liu

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc15 The Russian Federation s Annual Report

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc17 The European Union s Annual Report Wójcik I.

The Hague, Kingdom of the Netherlands October 2016 SC The European Union Annual report

Advice June 2012

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc19 Peru s Annual Report, part I (SPRFMO Area) IMARPE PRODUCE

SC5-Doc13. The European Annual Report. Irek Wojcik, Ad Corten

establishing further emergency measures in 2017 and 2018 for small pelagic stocks in the Adriatic Sea (GSA 17 and GSA 18)

The fishery for jack mackerel in the Eastern Central Pacific by European trawlers in 2008 and 2009

Pelagic fishery for Sebastes mentella in the Irminger Sea

ASSESSMENT OF THE WEST COAST OF NEWFOUNDLAND (DIVISION 4R) HERRING STOCKS IN 2011

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area

Chile s 2013 CMM 1.01 Implementation Report

Review of Taiwan s SBT Fishery of 2005/2006

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area.

CMM on Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area

High seas: conservation and management measures to prevent significant adverse impacts on vulnerable marine ecosystems

FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT

INTERIM MEASURES ADOPTED BY PARTICIPANTS IN NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-08 TARGET SIZE FOR THE TUNA FLEET IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Progress Made by Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs)

Cuota Global Anual de Captura de Jurel

SOMALIA National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2015

STOCK STATUS OF SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC):

Yellowfin Tuna, Indian Ocean, Troll/ pole and line

Year Avg. TAC Can Others Totals

Fishing mortality in relation to highest yield. Fishing mortality in relation to agreed target

Small pelagic fishery and research in Albania

9.4.5 Advice September Widely distributed and migratory stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

SC European Union 2013 Annual Report. Ad Corten

3.4.3 Advice June Barents Sea and Norwegian Sea Cod in Subareas I and II (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

"Present status of Tropical tuna fisheries in Iran"

5. purse seines 3 000

Bycatch accounting and management in the Ross Sea toothfish fishery

PROPOSAL IATTC-92 B-4 REVISED SUBMITTED BY BELIZE, GUATEMALA, NICARAGUA, COSTA RICA AND PANAMA

PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA STOCK ASSESSMENT

Advice June 2014

Successful management of small pelagics within a large international region:

South American Hake & Hoki. Mario Inostroza President of EMDEPES, Chile

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands;

Haddock, Iceland, ICES Va, Danish Seine

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE NINTH REGULAR SESSION August 2013 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Consultation Document

4.9.5 Norwegian spring-spawning herring

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

Draft Discussion Document. May 27, 2016

REC.CM-GFCM/40/2016/4

Management advisory for the Bay of Bengal Indian mackerel fishery

Advice June 2012

MEFISTO PREPARED APPLICATIONS MODELLING FISHERIES MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TWELFTH REGULAR SESSION. Bali, Indonesia 3-11 August 2016

By-Catch and Discard Management: The Key to Achieving Responsible and Sustainable Fisheries in Europe

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

Leif Nøttestad, Øyvind Tangen and Svein Sundby

2018 COM Doc. No. PA4_810 / 2018 November 7, 2018 (11:44 AM)

ASSESSMENT OF THE WEST COAST OF NEWFOUNDLAND (DIVISION 4R) HERRING STOCKS IN 2013

2001 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH (Cynoscion regalis)

IOTC 2013 WPB th Working Party on Billfish. La Réunion 18 th -22 nd September 2013

The Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Herring in the North Sea, Exploitation and Conservation. Presentation by Dr Beatriz A. Roel

A8-0377/

West Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history

HADDOCK ON THE SOUTHERN SCOTIAN SHELF AND IN THE BAY OF FUNDY (DIV. 4X/5Y)

CMM on the Management of Bottom Fishing in the SPRFMO Convention Area

3.4 Stock Summaries Advice June 2011

IOTC 2015 WPEB11 45 Rev_1

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

REVIEW OF BIGEYE TUNA CATCH INCLUDING FISH SIZE BY JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

Report of Implementation for the year 2014

Advice June 2013 Version 2,

2.3.1 Advice May Capelin in Subareas V and XIV and Division IIa west of 5 W (Iceland East Greenland Jan Mayen area).

IOTC Agreement Article X. Report of Implementation for the year 2016

SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE Polish Research Report, by A. J. Paciorkowski Sea Fisheries Institute Gdynia Poland.

PRESIDENCY WORKING DOCUMENT

11th Meeting of the Science Working Group. Lima, Peru, October SWG-11-12a. New Zealand SPRFMO Observer Implementation Report for 2011

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

YELLOWFIN TUNA (Thunnus albacares)

Advice June, revised September Herring in Division IIIa and Subdivisions (Western Baltic spring spawners)

STATUS OF THE PACIFIC COAST

Odd Aksel Bergstad Institute of Marine Research Norway

IOTC 2015 SC18 ES06[E]

SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING JUNE Assessment of Demersal Redfish in NAFO Subarea 1

Northeast Atlantic Mackerel, Handlines

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FIFTH REGULAR SESSION August 2009 Port Vila, Vanuatu

Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in the Northeast Atlantic

Advice October 2012

The South African and Namibian horse mackerel fisheries Prepared by Dave Japp and Melanie Smith. The South African horse mackerel

Sustainable Seas - Marine Fisheries Fisheries and Fishing

RESOLUTION 15/04 CONCERNING THE IOTC RECORD OF VESSELS AUTHORISED TO OPERATE IN THE IOTC AREA OF

NFR-22. National Report: Update on tuna fisheries of Taiwan in the Pacific Region. SCTB15 Working Paper

Transcription:

3 rd Meeting of the Scientific Committee Port Vila, Vanuatu 28 September - 3 October 2015 SC-03-14 Chile s Annual report Subsecretaría de Pesca y Acuicultura

ANNUAL NATIONAL REPORT SPRFMO-SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE August, 2015.

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY 1.1 Composition of the Fleet. Between January and July 2015, the industrial purse seine fleet operating on jack mackerel fishery in both, the SPFRMO area and Chilean EEZ combined, consisted of 88 vessels. This number is slightly lower than 2014 (88 vessels) and represents a stabilization in the downward trend observed since 2009, when 129 vessels operated. The fleet contraction has been mainly associated with a reduction of the catch quota resulting from the resource s critical condition. The fleet observed in 2015 was constituted by 67% for vessels with a hold capacity not exceeding 600 m3 which operated mainly in the north area of the country (Table I) Table I. Number of industrial purse seine vessels catching jack mackerel in both, the Chilean EEZ and SPRFMO area combined, between 2011 and July 2015. Data were assembled by year and hold capacity. (2015* are preliminary data). Hold Capacity (m 3 ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (*) 0-300 2 0 1 0 2 300-600 67 60 60 60 57 600-900 10 8 8 6 7 900-1200 10 6 6 5 4 1200-1500 11 9 8 5 7 1500-1800 12 9 9 8 8 1800-2100 5 5 4 4 3 TOTAL 117 97 96 88 88 As a result of changes in the resource s distribution, between 2012 and 2014, the jack mackerel fleet operated mainly within the Chilean EEZ. Nevertheless this condition was reversed during 2015, with a 30% of the fleet operating in the SPRFMO, mainly represented in that area by vessels with hold capacities greater than 900 m3 (Table II).

Table II. Number of industrial purse seine vessels catching jack mackerel in the SPRFMO area between 2011 and July 2015. Data were assembled by year and hold capacity. (2015* are preliminary data). Hold Capacity (m 3 ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (*) 0-300 0 0 0 0 0 300-600 0 0 0 0 0 600-900 4 0 2 0 3 900-1200 4 2 1 3 4 1200-1500 9 1 3 3 7 1500-1800 10 3 3 4 8 1800-2100 5 3 1 1 3 TOTAL 32 9 10 11 25 1.2 Catches, Seasonality of Catches, Fishing Grounds and By-catch Catches As observed from 2011 to date, the total catch of jack mackerel by the Chilean fleet has remained stable due to compliance with the catch quotas set by the SPRFMO. The catch projection to August 2015 reached 269,893 metric tons, a value 2% lower than registered during the entire 2014. Unlike 2014, this year 56,223 metric tons have been captured in the SPRFMO Area, which represent near 20% of the total catch of the national fleet (Figure 1 and Table III). In spite of yet restricted fishing quotas, during 2015 catches of jack mackerel in the northern area of the country have been higher than those recorded in the past four years, totaling 35 thousand tons during the first half. These catches were mainly composed by jack mackerel caught as bycatch in the anchovy fishery. Besides jack mackerel, the national fleet also captured chub mackerel, which totaled 40,198 by July 2015, value significantly exceeding the average registered for the period 2012-2014. However, catches of chub mackerel in the SPRFMO area did not exceed 1% of the total catch of this resource during the same period in 2015 (Figure 2 and Table IV).

Year Chilean Jack Mackerel (t) Chilean EEZ SPRFMO Area Total 2008 376,370 519,738 896,108 2009 491,792 343,135 834,927 2010 355,510 109,298 464,808 2011 193,722 53,573 247,295 2012 223,322 4,138 227,460 2013 225,443 5,917 231,360 2014 268,531 3,983 272,514 2015 213,670 56,223 269,893 Figure 1 and Table III. Total annual jack mackerel catch in the Chilean EEZ and the SPRFMO area with purse seine nets for the period 2008 - August 2015 (31 th august projection).

180 160 Thousand Tons 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 SPRFMO Area Chilean EEZ 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year Years Chub Mackerel (t) Chilean EEZ SPRFMO Area Total 2008 87,316 45,702 133,018 2009 136,516 21,936 158,452 2010 94,723 936 95,659 2011 23,077 2,979 26,056 2012 24,120 199 24,319 2013 26,086 243 26,325 2014 24,135 31 24,166 2015 39,478 1,440 40,918 Figure 2 and Table IV. Total annual chub mackerel catch in the Chilean EEZ and SPRFMO area with purse seine nets for the period 2008 - July 2015. Note: the total catch in 2014 was modified.

Seasonality of Catches During the first half of 2015, monthly catches of jack mackerel fluctuated around 22 thousand metric tons (Figure 3), the lowest value recorded for period 2010-2015. This condition is mainly explained by low catches registered during February, when a high presence of juveniles was detected in catches. Nevertheless, contrary to the usually low catches observed during the months of April, May and June in the period 2012-2014, for 2015, a significant increase in catches occurred in those months, with 56,200, 41,700 and 52,800 metric tons respectively, which accounted for 71% of the cumulative total catch of jack mackerel this year. Related to the historic pattern exhibited by the national fleet, the above reflects a slight shift in the fishing season, which extended in one month its operations this year. Figure 3: Seasonality of jack mackerel catches by the purse-seine fleet for the period 2010- August 2015. Source: SERNAPESCA. Spatial Distribution of Catches During 2013 and 2014, the fleet operating in the south-central area of the Chile exhibited a catch pattern mainly restricted to the EEZ, within the first 100 nm, not displaying the typical shift towards international waters during the second and third trimesters as observed in previous years.

For the first quarter of 2015, the spatial distribution of jack mackerel catches in the south central area of Chile were concentrated near the coast (first 100 nm) and between 29-37 SL and. Later in April and May, catches were concentrated further north-west, between 29-35 SL but still within the EEZ (Figure 4). Nevertheless in June 2015 the fleet exhibited a different pattern of operation compared with previous years (2013 and 2014) with catches obtained away from the coast, even outside the EEZ. These were concentrated further south, between 39-43 SL.

Figure 4: Spatial-temporal distribution of industrial jack mackerel purse seine fleet 2013, 2014, and Jun 2015. Source: IFOP.

National Landings of Jumbo Flying Squid With the exception of 2010, when the industrial fleet increased its operation on jumbo flying squid, in recent years the national landings of this resource mainly came from the artisanal fleet (Fig. 5). At present, jumbo flying squid is being caught using jigging by the demersal artisanal fleet in Regions IV, V and VIII, and occasionally by the artisanal pelagic purse seine fleet in Region VIII. In the early years of this fishery, the industrial fleet caught this resource as bycatch, when targeting other pelagic and demersal species of higher economic value. However, from 2011 to date, this species has also become a target species and part of the fishing effort turns to its exploitation. This condition is a response to the declining abundance of other resources of higher value. In 2012 jumbo flying squid was declared in a state of full exploitation and a fishing quota of 180,000 metric tons was established, which later increased to 200,000 metric tons in. 2013, 2014 and 2015. Figure 5: National Landings of Jumbo Flying Squid Bycatch, Discards and Incidental Catch In order to enhance focus on conservation, in September 2012 the Chilean Government enacted a discard (bycatch) law (N 20.625) establishing control measures and sanctions for those who discard at sea, and improving working conditions for fisheries observers, ensuring the collection of unbiased data. Provisions on the incidental catch of seabirds, turtles and marine mammals were also established through this law Since discard and incidental catch were largely unknown, the law required a two-year research program, to gather basic information on these subjects (quantities, causes,

and spatial variations). On the other hand, to discourage atypical fleet s behaviors during the program, participating vessels were exempted from discard penalties. The research program started with bottom-trawl fisheries, but was expanded to other fisheries and gears in 2014 and 2015 through increased budget. In February 2015, trough Resolution 524, the program was initiated in the industrial purse seine fleet targeting mackerel in both, the central south area (V-X Regions) and international waters. Data are being collected by observers on board and results will be of public domain once the study is finished in February 2017 Within 3 years of initiated the jack mackerel program, a reduction plan, containing technological and administrative measures, surveillance programs, codes of conduct, and incentives to improve selectivity, shall be established. Discards and incidental catches shall be informed by vessel owners, and as of 2016 vessels 45 feet must install electronic monitoring systems to detect discard (observers cannot monitor compliance). 2. EFFORT AND CPUE FOR JACK MACKEREL FISHERY The information contained in this section concerns the fleet of the central-southern area targeting jack mackerel. Catch, effort, and CPUE were calculated for fishing trips where jack mackerel represented more than 50% of the catch Due to the remoteness of the fishing grounds, until 2010, the length of fishing trips for jack mackerel exhibited a growing trend (Figure 6). Subsequently, in 2012 and 2013, catches were concentrated within the EEZ, which reduced considerably (-50%) the average length of the fishing trips and stabilized the decrease off the fishing effort. In 2015, catches have been congregated southwestward, as evidenced by increased length of the fishing trips. Consequently, fishing effort, measured as the number of fishing trips with catch decreased progressively until reaching the lowest levels in 2010, then stabilized between 2011 and 2014, and recently exhibited a slight increase during 2015. On the other hand, the standardized CPUE, measured as the utilization rate of the carrying capacity of the fleet (catch/(hold capacity displaced x length of fishing trip)) exhibited a decreasing trend between 2001 and 2011. Subsequently, in 2012, this indicator changed its trend toward higher values with a slight decreasing tendency between 2012 and 2015. The change in trend observed from 2012 onwards is explained by a decrease in the average length of the fishing trips as a result of changes in the distribution of the resource (Figure 7).

Figure 6: Effort in number of trips with catch (blue), and length of fishing trips in days (red) for the purse seine fleet in the center-southern zone, period 2001-2015 (preliminary). Data SERNAPESCA. Source: IFOP. Figure 7: Nominal CPUE for the purse seine fleet in the center-southern zone, period 2001-2015 (preliminary). Source: IFOP.

3. RESEARCH PROGRAMS Research programs for jack mackerel include standard projects carried out annually by IFOP (Fisheries Development Institute) along with complementary projects. The information obtained is used by the Fishing Authority to support the decisionmaking process. Basic (standard) projects performed by IFOP during 2014: Hydroacoustic assessment of jack mackerel biomass between XV-IV Regions, 2014 This research cruise took place from March 18st through April 24 th 2014, and included an exploration area located between the northern boundary of the country and Coquimbo (30 05 SL), where perpendicular transects reaching up to 100 nm from the coast, were prospected. As a result, in the prospected area, a jack mackerel biomass of 85,200 tons was estimated. Monitoring of the jack mackerel fishery This study allowed gathering real-time information on the evolution of the main biological and fishing indicators, associated with the jack mackerel fishery and its bycatch. The monitoring was carried out along the entire maritime space between the north boundary of Chile and 47 00 SL, and included information gathered at sea from both the small-scale, and the industrial fleet as well information form disembarking points. Assessment of total allowable catch Similarly as done by the SWG, this study used the Joint Jack Mackerel (JJM) model. This project was aimed to set up the status of the resource, and also to assess biologically sustainable exploitation rates. The results were used by the Fishing Authority to improve the stock evaluation, simulate different exploitation scenarios and conduct additional analyses.

Protocol for otolith reading in jack mackerel This project aims to develop a protocol for determining the age of jack mackerel, by validating the identification of the first annual ring and the assessment of the age of jack mackerel trough standardized reading of annual rings. Population structure and assessment of recruitment indices for Jack mackerel based on biophysical models (Phase I). This study aims to implement a spatially explicit biophysical model that allows predicting areas of recruitment for juvenile jack mackerel as well as connectivity relations between all the spawning areas of the resource. Discard and incidental catch research program for industrial fleet targeting jack mackerel in V-X Regions and International Waters This study began in February 2015 and is intended to quantify the discards of target species and the incidental catch of seabirds, turtles and marine mammals. Additionally it has to identify the causes of these practices and how they occur. The study should include a proposal of measures aimed at the reduction of discards and incidental takes which will be implemented through a reduction plan by 2017. Data are being obtained through both observers on board and self-reporting by skipper or vessel owners. 4. BIOLOGICAL SAMPLING, AND LENGTH AND AGE COMPOSITION OF THE CATCH. 4.1 Biological sampling Biological information is obtained on a regular basis from samples collected along the Chilean coast for jack mackerel and its associated species. Sampling are conducted on a daily basis, mainly at landing sites/processing plants, but are also complemented with information gathered by fisheries observers on board fishing vessels. The information collected includes fork length measurements, otolith collection, total weight, gutted weight, gonad weight, and sex and maturity stages. The amount of length and biological samples obtained for jack mackerel during 2014 added up 191.524 y 18.734 specimens, respectively. For the industrial fleet, samples included at-sea sampling as well as port sampling, covering the whole range of activity reported for this fishery in Chile. The main landing ports sampled were Caldera and Coquimbo in the north area, and Talcahuano in the central-south area of the fishery (Table III).

Chub mackerel, the main bycatch for jack mackerel, was also sampled during 2014. A total of 12.153 and 740 specimens for length and biological samples were collected respectively. Table III. Number of Jack mackerel and Chub mackerel specimens collected in 2014 to gather biological and length samples. Landing Port Jack Mackerel Chub Mackerel Lenght Sampling Biological Sampling Lenght Sampling Biological Sampling Arica 6.796 94 1343 Iquique 18.753 293 3779 Antofagasta 24.598 351 4953 139 Caldera 46.619 2384 1521 129 Coquimbo 58.944 906 476 39 S. Antonio 11.224 3.897 25 183 Talcahuano 16.306 6.989 37 225 Valdivia 7.766 3.761 19 25 Chiloé 518 59 Guaitecas TOTAL 191.524 18.734 12.153 740 4.2 Length and age composition of catches a.- Jack mackerel Unlike the observed between 2012 and 2014, during the first half of 2015, the size structure of jack mackerel showed a multimodal distribution, with a shift of the main mode toward smaller individuals. In 2015, the main mode was 26-27 cm FL, followed by a secondary mode of 35 cm FL. These modes belong to fish caught in the south-center area of the fishery, where juveniles have been present during most part of this year. It should be noted that a smaller mode occurred at 14-15 cm FL, which belongs to juvenile fish caught as bycatch in the purse seine fishery for anchovy in the north area of the country (Figure 8)

Figure 8. Length structure of jack mackerel, total catch in number 2011 - june 2015. Source: IFOP During 2014, the age structure for jack mackerel was constituted by 20 age groups, where ages V and VI (caught in the central south area), and age II (caught in the north area) represented the main modes. Similarly as observed in 2013, an important contribution of juvenile fish (age II) was detected in 2014, differing from 2012, when juvenile were almost absent in the fishery (Figure 9). 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 0 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI Age XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX Figure 9: Age structure of jack mackerel, total catch in numbers, 2010-2014. Source: IFOP.

b. Chub mackerel size composition Restricted by small catches of chub mackerel during the last three years (2012-2015), the numbers of samples obtained have not been representative enough as to establish an age structure. However, as a reference point, it is possible to indicate that samples obtained between 19-24 SL during the first half of 2015, exhibited a multimodal structure with a main and a secondary mode at 33 and 36 cm FL respectively. In the southern area of the country (33-40 SL), the size structure for this resource exhibited of a main mode of 33 cm FL. c.- Jumbo Flying Squid Research carried out in recent years by the Institute for Fisheries Development have indicated an adjustment of the length-weight ratio for Jumbo Flying Squid according to the following relation P = 0.0000254 L 3.0771664 ; see also Figure 10 The above has allowed to estimate a growth model based in mantle length and body weight as exhibited in Figure 11. Figure 10: Adjustment of the length-weight ratio

Figure 11: Growth models in mantle length and body weight for Jumbo Flying Squid in central Chile. 5. AT-SEA AND PORT SAMPLING PROGRAM. To assess the level of sampling coverage in the SPRFMO area, only fishing trips targeting jack mackerel (i.e. over 50% of the total catch per fishing trip) that also carried fisheries observers on board and/or included at-port samplings by observers, were considered in this report Due to a more costal pattern of the jack mackerel fishery during the last years, it has been difficult to cover the operations of the fleet in the SPRFMO area with observers on board, since fishing trips have become infrequent and unpredictable there and not planed in advance as to guarantee the presence of an observer. In spite of the restrictions, onboard sampling coverage and at-port sampling coverage for fishing trips in the SPRFMO in 2014 was 19.5% and 18.5% respectively, with a total combined sampling coverage of 38%. (Table V). Inside the Chilean EEZ, on board sampling coverage by observers was 12,2%, and atport sampling coverage was 13,9%, with a combined total sampling coverage of 26%.

Table V. Sampling coverage by observers at port and observers onboard in the Chilean jack mackerel fishery At-Port On board Total Chilean EEZ 13,9% 12,2% 26% SPRFMO 18,8% 19,5% 38% Total 15,1% 13,9% 29% 6.- ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES Total catch quota. Each year, by the month of December, the Undersecretariat for Fisheries and Aquaculture establishes catch quotas for every resource in full exploitation regime, to be applied in the next year. The quota for jack mackerel proposed by the Undersecretariat in December 2014 was 310 thousand metric tons. Subsequently and according to agreements reached in February 2015 during the third Meeting of the SPRFMO in Auckland, New Zealand, the annual quota for jack mackerel (including high seas and EEZ catches) was reduced to 297,000 tons (Exempted Decree N 204/2015), which is close to be fully consumed. Discard Law and Discard Research Program In 2012 Law N 20.625 established control measures and sanctions for those who discard at sea, In February 2015, trough Resolution N 524, a research program to study discard was initiated in the industrial purse seine fleet targeting mackerel in both, the central south area (V-X Regions) and international waters. Seamounts measure protect The General Law on Fisheries and Aquaculture includes the protection of the vulnerable marine ecosystems within the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), defining Vulnerable Marine Ecosystem (VME) as a natural unit consisting of fragile geological structures, populations or communities of low biological productivity invertebrates that shows low or poor recovery against anthropological disturbances, such as seamounts, hydrothermal vents, cold-water coral formations, or submarine canyons. Chilean legislation defines seamounts as elevations of the ocean floor that do not emerge to the surface and with heights over 1,000m measured from the surrounding

sea floor that constitutes their base. Likewise, it states that in the case of seamounts, bottom fishing shall not be allowed, unless there is scientific research conducted in accordance with the protocol and regulation demonstrating that fishing activities do not have negative consequences on the vulnerable marine ecosystems within the area. Therefore, seamounts are acknowledged as VMEs and protection measures to be adopted are established, in the case that fishing operations could be conducted. A piece of research conducted in 2006 (Yañez et al., 2008), allowed the collection and systematization of the existing knowledge regarding the geographical distribution of seamounts, identifying 118 seamounts within the Chilean EEZ (see figure). A recent review of this information allowed to identify one of them outside the EEZ and four of them located near Easter Island, within the Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park (Figure 12). In order to comply with the protection of seamounts in accordance with the law, areas associated to them were determined, considering a circular area estimated from the 3,000 m isobath of depth next to it. In such areas and in accordance with the law, bottom fishing is prohibited. Figure 12. Chile seamounts protect areas.