Public Opinion, Traffic Performance, the Environment, and Safety After Construction of Double-Lane Roundabouts

Similar documents
Factors Leading to Older Drivers Intersection Crashes

The Case for Roundabouts:

Gap Acceptance Cycles for Modelling Roundabout Capacity and Performance

Intersection Improvement: Sturgeon Road, Silver Avenue and Murray Park Road Roundabout. Welcome. Public Information Session

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

Introduction Roundabouts are an increasingly popular alternative to traffic signals for intersection control in the United States. Roundabouts have a

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

A Comprehensive HCM 2010 Urban Streets Analysis Using HCS 2010 US 31W in Elizabethtown, KY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

Updated Roundabout Analysis Methodology

Effects of Automated Speed Enforcement in Montgomery County, Maryland, on Vehicle Speeds, Public Opinion, and Crashes

Background on the Revisions to VDOT s Access Management Spacing Standards

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

ROUNDABOUT MODEL COMPARISON TABLE

ROUNDABOUT MODEL COMPARISON TABLE

Turn Lane Warrants: Concepts, Standards, Application in Review

Chapter 7 Intersection Design

Reducing Speed: The C-Roundabout

SUPERSTREETS IN TEXAS. ITS Texas Annual Meeting San Marcos, Texas Session 6A - Operations November 11, 2011

Management of Multi-Lane Highways in Jordan (Case Study)

Stanley Street/Shotover Street, Queenstown. Traffic Modelling Report

INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road

Intersection Design. Leah Ness, Craig Hardy and Eric Sorensen

Attachment C: Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet

Intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Maple Street in Lexington Signalized Intersection and Roundabout Comparison

Way. Roundabout (FUNCTIONING AS A ROUNDABOUT) Driving the

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Evaluating Roundabout Capacity, Level of Service and Performance

Module 5: Navigating Roadways

Roundabouts The Virginia Experience

Signal Spacing A Technical Memorandum Prepared by

Traffic Impact Analysis

Defining Purpose and Need

Roundabout Model Calibration Issues and a Case Study

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

Roundabouts A Case Study and Brief Overview

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM VDOT Central Region On Call Task Order

Safety Evaluation at Innovative Geometric Designs Gilbert Chlewicki, PE Advanced Transportation Solutions

ROUNDABOUTS. Improving Safety and Efficiency. SR83 & Smithville Western Rd. Joel Montgomery, PE Director of Administration

INTERSECTION SAFETY RESEARCH IN CRACOW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Crashes at Multilane Roundabouts and How to Reduce Them By Mehrdad Givechi, PE, PTOE

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

Roundabout Design 101: Roundabout Capacity Issues

Washington St. Corridor Study

An Analysis of the Travel Conditions on the U. S. 52 Bypass. Bypass in Lafayette, Indiana.

3.9 - Transportation and Traffic

Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts. Presentation to the Howard-Suamico School Board November 26, 2007

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 UPDATE HISTORY

INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 NORTH GLEBE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA PHONE 703/ FAX 703/

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

A New Lane-Based Model for Platoon Patterns at Closely-Spaced Signalised Intersections

CR 30 / CR 11 and CR 30 / CR 11C Intersection Improvement Project. What Should We Build?

An Analysis of Reducing Pedestrian-Walking-Speed Impacts on Intersection Traffic MOEs

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

The Effect of Pavement Marking on Speed. Reduction in Exclusive Motorcycle Lane. in Malaysia

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

Use of Additional Through Lanes at Signalized Intersections

INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 NORTH GLEBE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA PHONE 703/ FAX 703/

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

Project Goals and Objectives

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

aasidra for Roundabouts INTRODUCTION

Effects of Traffic Condition (v/c) on Safety at Freeway Facility Sections

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

MEASURING PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE) FOR LARGE VEHICLES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Assessing Level of Service for Highways in a New Metropolitan City

League City Parkway at Brittany Lakes/Fennigan Intersection Evaluation/ Traffic Study. Second Public Meeting February 6, 2018

REDUCING COLLISIONS AT HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Driver Yielding at Midblock Crossings Based on Roadway, Traffic, and Crosswalk Characteristics

Modern Roundabouts: a guide for application

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Hewson Planning 35 Corbett Road RD2 Whangarei 082. Attachment 5. Traffic Assessment

Markings Technical Committee Chapter 3H: Roundabout Markings APPROVED IN NCUTCD COUNCIL ON JANUARY 20, 2006

Roundabouts in Australia: the state of the art on models and applications

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY TASK FORCE. Jeff Moseley Texas Transportation Commission

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

Safety Assessment of Installing Traffic Signals at High-Speed Expressway Intersections

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

I-95 Northbound at US 1 (Exit 126) Design and Study Final Report

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

Traffic Academy: IJS & IMS FAQ/RULES OF THUMB

Introduction to Roundabout Analysis Using ARCADY

Crash Patterns in Western Australia. Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services

Rural Highway Overtaking Lanes

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Safety Benefits of Raised Medians and Pedestrian Refuge Areas. FHWA Safety Program.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Transcription:

Public Opinion, Traffic Performance, the Environment, and Safety After Construction of Double-Lane Roundabouts TRB 93 rd Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. January 15, 2014 Wen Hu, Ph.D.

Intersection crashes 2012 42% of all police-reported crashes 46% of injury crashes 23% of fatal crashes 7,696 deaths

Safety benefits of converting traditional intersections to roundabouts European, Australian, and U.S. research 35-61% reductions in all crashes 25-87% reductions in injury crashes Greater safety benefits for single-lane roundabouts than for double-lane roundabouts Smaller reductions in crashes at double-lane roundabouts, or Increases in crashes at double-lane roundabouts

Traffic and environmental benefits of converting traditional intersections to roundabouts Previous research 13-89% reductions in vehicle delays 14-52% reductions in the proportion of vehicles stopped Vehicle emissions and fuel consumption reduced Roundabout construction often part of larger construction project; unclear in prior studies whether effects of roundabouts separated from other construction effects

Potential benefits of roundabouts for older drivers Older drivers are over-involved in intersection crashes A study of at-fault drivers in nonfatal intersection crashes found older drivers more likely than younger drivers to be cited for failure to yield the right-of-way Consequences of failing to yield likely less severe at roundabouts than at traditional intersections A 2007 study found support for roundabouts was lower among drivers 65 and older than among younger drivers 1 year or longer after construction Concerns that older drivers will choose alternative routes to avoid roundabouts

Study of conversions of two traditional intersections to double-lane roundabouts near Bellingham, Washington Limited research on multi-lane roundabouts in the United States Evaluate the impacts of the double-lane roundabouts on: Public attitudes Traffic performance and the environment Crashes Evaluate whether older drivers avoided roundabouts by taking an alternative route

Study roundabout

Guide Meridian Road Before construction: 2-lane undivided road After construction: 2 lanes in each direction, divided with a median and cable barrier Construction started in April 2008 about 2 miles 2 lanes undivided

Study roundabouts Guide Meridian-Pole Road roundabout Traffic signal-controlled before conversion Fully operational in August 2009 Guide Meridian-Wiser Lake Road roundabout Two-way stop-controlled before conversion Fully operational in October 2009

Public attitudes and perceptions

Percent of drivers who support roundabouts Telephone surveys of Bellingham area residents 80 60 40 20 0 before construction 6 months after construction 1 year after construction

Percent of drivers who support roundabouts By driver age 80 60 drivers younger than 70 drivers 70 and older 40 20 0 before construction 6 months after construction 1 year after construction

Percent of drivers who reported taking an alternate road to Guide Meridian By driver age 80 drivers younger than 70 drivers 70 and older 60 40 20 0 6 months after construction 1 year after construction

Reasons for opposing roundabouts Top reason before and after construction Roundabouts are unsafe Other frequent responses before construction Roundabouts are confusing Prefer traffic signal Other frequent responses 6 months and 1 year after construction Problems with right-of-way or yielding Problems with large trucks

Percent of drivers who agreed that signs and pavement markings clearly conveyed One year after construction that drivers are approaching a roundabout 88 which lane drivers needs to be in to exit 69 what speed drivers should travel 59 which lane has the right-of-way to exit 55 that drivers should not drive beside large trucks in a roundabout 52

Traffic performance analysis

Data and modeling software Traffic recorded during 7 a.m. 7 p.m. on three weekdays shortly before and 4 months after roundabout construction Peak hour traffic analyzed: 7 a.m. 9 a.m., 11 a.m. 2 p.m., and 4 p.m. 6 p.m. Intersection characteristics before and after roundabout construction obtained from Washington DOT Analysis performed with SIDRA INTERSECTION 5.1 Highway Capacity Manual 2010 model

Traffic performance analysis scenarios To isolate effects of roundabout conversions from increased traffic capacity, hypothetical intersections were developed with original traffic controls but additional travel lanes Traffic performance evaluated for: Before-construction intersections with before traffic volumes Before-construction intersections with after traffic volumes Hypothetical intersections with after traffic volumes Roundabouts with after traffic volumes Effects of roundabouts estimated as difference between roundabout performance and hypothetical intersection performance

Measures of traffic performance and environmental effects Traffic performance Degree of saturation, or vehicle/capacity ratio Average intersection control delay Maximum control delay 95% queue length of the worst lane Proportion queued Level of service Environmental effects Fuel consumption Emissions of carbon dioxide, hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxide

Percent change in traffic performance measures Roundabouts vs. hypothetical intersections with additional lanes 40 20 0-20 -40 degree of saturation average intersection control delay maximum control delay 95% queue length, worst lane proportion queued -60-80 -100 Guide Meridian-Pole Road Guide Meridian-Wiser Lake Road

Percent change in environmental measures Roundabouts vs. hypothetical intersections with additional lanes 0-20 -40 fuel consumption carbon dioxide hydrocarbon carbon monoxide nitrogen oxide -60 Guide Meridian-Pole Road Guide Meridian-Wiser Lake Road

Crash analysis

Methods Before and after analysis with comparison intersections Selected comparison intersections based on similarity in traffic control, intersection layout, and traffic volumes Guide Meridian-Pole Road: 5 sites Guide Meridian-Wiser Lake Road: 8 sites Study periods Before: January 2003-December 2007 After: January 2010-December 2011 Included crashes occurring at intersection or intersection-related Crash rates computed with average annual daily traffic counts Poisson regression for all crashes, property damage-only crashes and injury and fatal crashes combined

Percent change in crash rates at Guide Meridian- Pole Road and comparison intersections After vs. before roundabout construction 60 40 Guide Meridian-Pole Road Comparison intersections 20 0-20 -40-60 property damage only crashes injury and fatal crashes total crashes

Percent differences in actual crash rates at Guide Meridian-Pole Road vs. expected rates without roundabout conversion 40 20 significant not significant 0-20 -40 property damage-only crashes injury and fatal crashes total crashes

Percent change in crash rates at Guide Meridian- Wiser Lake Road and comparison intersections After vs. before roundabout construction 100 60 Guide Meridian-Wiser Lake Road Comparison intersections 20-20 -60-100 property damage-only crashes injury and fatal crashes total crashes

Percent differences in actual crash rates at Guide Meridian-Wiser Lake Road vs. expected rates without roundabout conversion 600 400 significant not significant 200 0-200 property damage-only crashses injury and fatal crashes total crashes

Older driver travel patterns

Methods Drivers photographed before and 4 months after roundabout construction 2 locations along Guide Meridian study corridor 2 comparable locations on Hannegan Road Driver age category coded by researchers Younger than 20, 20-59, 60-69, 70 and older Odds ratio computed for whether drivers 70 and older were more likely to take Guide Meridian vs. Hannegan Road after the roundabout construction than before

Proportions of drivers 70 and older on Guide Meridian Road and Hannegan Road Before and after roundabout construction 6 4 2 before after Odds Ratio = 0.32; i.e., odds that older drivers would travel on Guide Meridian vs. Hannegan Road after roundabout construction was 0.32 times lower than before Proportions of older drivers were very small (< 5 percent) 0 Guide Meridian Road Hannegan Road

Conclusions Drivers acceptance of roundabouts improved over time Substantial benefits in traffic operations and environmental effects Serious crash rates declined at roundabouts although not significantly Increased complexity of double-lane roundabouts may present challenges Confusion about navigating roundabouts persisted one year after Some older drivers may be taking an alternative route to avoid roundabouts Property damage-only and total crash rates increased Relatively short-term effects of roundabout conversions examined When roundabouts are part of a larger effort to increase capacity on a roadway, effects on traffic performance, emissions, and even safety may accrue some years after construction

Dedicated to reducing deaths, injuries, and property damage on the highway Wen Hu, Ph.D. Research Transportation Engineer 703-247-1560 whu@iihs.org