INLAND MARITIME INITIATIVE: FOREST CARNIVORES. Winter 2011 Update

Similar documents
Study Terrestrial Furbearer Abundance and Habitat Use

Cabinet-Yaak / Selkirk Mountains 2016 Grizzly Bear Monitoring

Wolverine Tracking Project Scat Surveys

Wolverine Tracking Project Collecting Genetic Samples

FIELDTRIP REPORT. 7 th June to 8 th August 2016 DRY SEASON. Report by: Jessica Comley, Rhodes University, Grahamstown

Dear Volunteer: Sincerely, Anne Coles. President, Alberta Trappers Association. RFMA Log Book- Trapping Season 2017/18 Page 1

TAKE A CHANCE PART 2

Cascadia Wild Wolverine Tracking Project Season Report

Progress Report

2017 FIELD SEASON REPORT

Lynx Protection Zone and Trap Restrictions

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

2014 SPRING-FALL FIELD SEASON REPORT

submitted: fall 2009

A guide to identifying evidence of pine martens in Wales

Evaluating genetic connectivity and re-colonization dynamics of moose in the Northeast.

FIELDTRIP REPORT. The Selati River flowing. 5 th January to 7 th March st WET SEASON. Report by:

Best Management Practices for Trapping American Marten in the United States

Minnesota TREK MINNESOTA TRAIL SELF-GUIDED TOUR 6TH - 8TH GRADE. Minnesota Trek 6 8th grades 1

NEW BRUNSWICK FURBEARER HARVEST REPORT

Wayne Kasworm: 2018 Research / Monitoring Update

Final Report on 2014 and 2015 ISSSP Pacific Fisher Inventory on the Willamette and Umpqua National Forests

HOME RANGE AND HABITAT USE OF PLAINS SPOTTED SKUNKS IN THE OZARK MOUNTAINS OF ARKANSAS

Tracking the Trackers, Does Citizen Science Help or Hinder Rare Carnivore Research

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

Tiger Conservation: Capacity Building Training for Forest Frontline Staff, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh

San Joaquin River Restoration Program, 2013 Chinook Salmon Trap and Haul Summary

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

Project Updates January 2015

Greater Yellowstone Wolverine Program

Cougar Outline. Historic and current status of cougars in the Midwest. Likelihood of cougar recolonization. Evidence of cougar presence

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Developing a target selective bait delivery technique for control of feral goats.

FWCP External Projects Delivered by Stakeholders and First Nations

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

Status and management of large carnivores in. Estonia. Peep Männil Nature Department Estonian Environment Agency. Photo: Toomas Tuul

NEVADA DIVISION OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F YELLOWSTONE CUTTHROAT TROUT EASTERN REGION

Pollinators in Decline

2015 Bear and Cougar Activity in Mountain View County

Overview Life history Distribution Management

Ma Ming Camera trapping on snow leopards in the Muzat Valley, Reserve, Xinjiang, P.R. China (October-December 2005).

Wolverines on the rebound in Washington By Seattle Times, adapted by Newsela staff May. 05, :47 PM

Heartwood Forest Small Mammal Survey Report October 2012

San Diego Feral Pig Eradication

Alberta Conservation Association 2013/14 Project Summary Report. Project Name: Mikkwa River Arctic Grayling Population Assessment

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

The first of its kind in Québec!

Conservation Planning in Vermont

LOOK AT THE PICTURE BELOW AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:

Introduction. Description. This animal

Salamanders of Idaho. Ambystomatidae Mole Salamanders Long-toed Salamander Barred Tiger Salamander. Dicamptodontidae Idaho Giant Salamander

Wyoming Game and Fish Department

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Red Wine Mountains Herd (RWMH) Caribou

Annex 1 to ISPM No. 26 (ESTABLISHMENT OF PEST FREE AREAS FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE)) Fruit fly trapping (200-) Steward: Walther Enkerlin

Evolving niche of the coy-wolf in northeastern forests and implications for biodiversity

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT CAPTURES, RELOCATIONS, AND REMOVALS IN NORTHWEST WYOMING

2018 Season Waterfowl Hunter Survey Summary. Presented by Josh Richardson, Sr. Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

Conservation of Elephants in Southern Murchison Falls Conservation Area, Uganda

Background. Kofa NWR historically had large numbers of desert bighorn average about 800 individuals

REPORT ON THE LYNX MONITORING TRAINING COURSE

Monitoring Amur Leopards in Southwest Primorskii Krai, Russia

Alberta Conservation Association 2009/10 Project Summary Report. Project Name: North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment

Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status

Rosettes, Rifles and Regulation: A Synthesis of the leopard hunting industry in Africa

SAULT STE. MARIE, ONTARIO COURSE OUTLINE

A NEW ERADICATION STRATEGY FOR SMALL, REMOTE GYPSY MOTH INFESTATIONS

Figure 39. Yearly Trend in Death Rates for Drowning: NSW, Year

Wyoming Range Mule Deer Project. Summer 2017 Update

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Amur Tiger Conservation in Lazovsky Zapovednik and Adjacent Areas, January-December 2017

TRANSNATIONAL TOOLBOX FOR POPULATION-LEVEL LYNX MONITORING O.T

What was the historic coaster fishery like?

SEA GRANT PROGRESS REPORT

Eastem Cougar Foundation. Newsletter. Update on ECF Activities:

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

PRELIMINARY CAMERA-TRAP OTTER SURVEY IN NAKAI-NAM THEUN NATIONAL PROTECTED AREA NOV-DEC 2015

Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of

JULY 2017 SUMMARY BULLETS

2015 Florida Black Bear Hunt Summary Report

BRIEFING on IBERIAN LYNX (Lynx pardinus) MANAGEMENT PLAN AT DOÑANA NATIONAL PARK

Environmental Law Under Trump: Public Lands, Wildlife, and Federalism

Into the Al Hajar with the Arabian Tahr 2012 FIELD REPORT

Conservation status of large carnivores in Hungary

Saskatchewan Wild Fur Harvest And Cash Values

Crossing Corridors. Objective. Materials. Background Information

Species at Risk. Provincial Government Overview. September 13 rd, Kendra Morgan, R.P.Bio.

Goldfish Removal Millar s Pond. Resort Municipality of Whistler

Inshore wrasse pot fishery What are the issues?

THE NEW TRAPPER S NOTEBOOK Notebook completion guide

The Importance of Radio-collared Bears

Saskatchewan Wild Fur Harvest And Cash Values

Big Cats and Augmented Reality

New Jersey Furbearer Management Newsletter Winter New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife Upland Wildlife and Furbearer Project

Determining Potential Environmental and Social Factors Affecting the Success of the Black Rhinoceros in Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa

Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Furbearer Management Report Harvest Year

Transcription:

INLAND MARITIME INITIATIVE: FOREST CARNIVORES Winter 2011 Update Idaho Department of Fish and Game Idaho Panhandle National Forest U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station

INTRODUCTION From January through April 2011, we used three techniques to survey forest carnivores in the West Cabinet and Selkirk Mountains: bait stations, live trapping, and incidental observations (Figures 1-4). BAIT STATIONS We surveyed 15 grids with 17 bait stations from January 22 through April 24, 2011 (Figure 1). Bait stations were located in the West Cabinet (n = 12), Selkirk (n = 4,) and Purcell Mountains (n = 1). We used a 10km x 10km grid system to maximize dispersal of cameras across the study area. Stations were visited 2-3 times: once for set up, once to collect samples/re-bait, and once to take down the set. Camera stations were baited with a whole, skinned beaver nailed and wired to a tree. Beginning approximately 1-2 feet below the bottom of the beaver, 2 concentric rings of 6 gun brushes (about 6 inches apart) were attached to the tree. A ring of glue strips was nailed to the tree approximately 6-12 inches below the gun brushes. A Reconyx RM45 or RC55 camera was placed on a tree approximately 10 feet away from the bait tree. At some sites, we used a film camera in place of the digital Reconyx camera. We attempted to re-bait all stations within 2-3 weeks of deployment, although in some cases, snow conditions prevented us from reaching the site. When a re-bait occurred, all gun brushes were collected in envelopes and replaced, glue strips were removed, camera memory cards were replaced, and a fresh beaver was hung in the tree. Bait station used to detect forest carnivores. A Reconyx camera (on left tree) captures pictures of carnivores visiting bait (on right tree). Gun brushes (inset) collect hair for DNA analysis.

Figure 1. 10km x 10km survey cells for 2010 (red), 2011 (yellow), and 2010-11 (orange)

Samples were allowed to dry after collection to minimize degradation of DNA. 355 total samples were collected. 187 were sent to the laboratory for genetic analysis. Cameras at all stations detected at least one species of carnivore including marten at 12 sites, fisher at 8 sites, ermine at 2 sites, and grizzly bear at 1 site (Figure 2). The film camera at one set captured a picture of two fisher kits, showing that reproducing adults are present in this population. Species detected with cameras during winter 2011. Clockwise from upper left: marten, fisher, 2 fisher kits, and ermine.

Figure 2. 10km x 10km cells surveyed (yellow outline) during winter of 2010 and 2011 where fisher (purple), wolverine (red, detected 2010), and lynx (blue, detected 2010) were detected.

WOLVERINE TRAPS We constructed two log traps in the Selkirk Mountains. We chose trap locations in areas we knew to be used by wolverine and lynx from the 2010 survey. Trap dimensions are approximately 4 ft x 6 ft x 8 ft. Traps were baited with skinned beaver. VHF trap transmitters were placed on each trap to monitor the status of the trap (open or closed) remotely. Signals were monitored at least twice a day and we visited the traps in person every three days to re-bait and make sure that trap transmitters were functioning properly. A Reconyx RC55 was placed at each trap to monitor the trap. Traps were run from January 19 th February 16 th 2011, left open but not set from February 17 th March 16 th to avoid capturing females with newborn kits, then opened again from March 17 th to March 29 th 2011, resulting in 82 total trap nights. Wolverine traps (left) were constructed from lodgepole pine and subalpine fir and were equipped with VHF transmitters (right) for remote monitoring. No wolverines were captured in 2011, however, one trap was visited twice by a wolverine. The first visit occurred on March 14 th when the traps were not set. The wolverine entered the trap and removed the bait. Chest patch markings identify this individual as likely the same wolverine that visited a bait station on February 28 th, 2010 (see photos below). This suggests that this is a resident wolverine and not a transient animal. The second visit was March 20 th when traps were open and set. The wolverine investigated, but did not enter, the trap (see photo below). We compared pictures of wolverines that visited the trap March 14 th and March 20 th and cannot determine if it is the same individual. Two non-target animals were captured this season. A marten was trapped on March 23 rd and a fisher was trapped on March 29 th. Hair samples were taken from the fisher for genetic analysis. Both animals were released unharmed.

A wolverine visited the trap on March 20 th, but was not captured. Pictures taken on March 14 th, 2011 (left) and February 28 th, 2010 (right). The chest patch pattern indicates this is the same individual and, therefore, likely a resident wolverine.

INCIDENTAL OBSERVATIONS Over the course of the season, we documented tracks of wolverines and lynx detected by ourselves or by volunteers with photo corroboration. Two DNA samples were obtained by backtracking a wolverine and a lynx. These samples have been sent to the lab for genetic analysis. Wolverine tracks observed by volunteers. Note the five toes characteristic of mustelids.

Wolverine tracks observed January 27 th, 2011. The animal detoured to scent mark the sapling and then returned to the road, which is typical wolverine behavior. Wolverine tracks documented during the April 2010 aerial survey. The animal appears to have made a detour, possibly to scent mark a tree.

SUMMARY The three targeted forest carnivore species of greatest conservation need (wolverine, fisher, and lynx) were detected during both the 2010 and 2011 winter surveys. Results of the last two winters surveys lead us to conclude there is at least one resident wolverine using the Idaho Selkirk Mountains. The gender and reproductive status of this individual remains unknown. The DNA sample collected in January, 2011 should yield gender and individual identification for this wolverine. Three sets of wolverine tracks were detected in the West Cabinets in 2011. However, we have not yet detected a pattern of landscape use. Lynx were detected once in 2010 (Selkirks) and once in 2011 (Purcells). A genetic gender test indicated the 2010 lynx is most likely a male. Lynx were not detected in the Selkirks in 2011, despite a baited wolverine trap being located near the 2010 detection site. A scat was collected from a lynx in 2011, which was backtracked in the Purcells. This scat sample was sent to the lab for analysis and genetic results are pending. Fishers were detected at 67% (8 of 12) of bait stations in the West Cabinets in 2011. This is greater than the 2010 survey where fishers were detected at 6% (1 of 16) bait stations in the Selkirks. A set of 2 fisher kits were photographed in the West Cabinets in 2011, indicating the presence of reproductive adults. PARTNERSHIPS This project is a collaborative effort between the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Idaho Panhandle National Forest, and U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station. Community volunteers and volunteers from Friends of Scotchman Peak Wilderness, Selkirk Conservation Alliance, and Selkirk Outdoor Leadership Experience have provided tremendous support in conducting field work. The Oregon Zoo Conservation Fund provided a grant to conduct the 2010 aerial survey. West Cabinet Mountains