THE INFLUENCE OF FOOTBALL BOOT CONSTRUCTION ON BALL VELOCITY AND DEFORMATION. Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia

Similar documents
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KICKING PERFORMANCE BASED ON DIFFERENT KIND OF SHOES

Development of an end-effector to simulate the foot to ball interaction of an instep kick in soccer

Impact Points and Their Effect on Trajectory in Soccer

Optimal Football Pressure as a Function of a Footballer s Physical Abilities

Characteristics of ball impact on curve shot in soccer

APPROACH RUN VELOCITIES OF FEMALE POLE VAULTERS

2) Jensen, R. Comparison of ground-reaction forces while kicking a stationary and non-stationary soccer ball

BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF RUNNING AND SOCCER SHOES: METHODOLOGY AND TESTING PROCEDURES. Ewald M. Hennig

Describing the Performance of Cricket Bats and Balls

The validity of a rigid body model of a cricket ball-bat impact

Procedia Engineering 00 2 (2010) (2009) Properties of friction during the impact between tennis racket surface and ball

ScienceDirect. Rebounding strategies in basketball

BODY FORM INFLUENCES ON THE DRAG EXPERIENCED BY JUNIOR SWIMMERS. Australia, Perth, Australia

Ball impact dynamics of knuckling shot in soccer

Original Article. Relationship between speed and accuracy of instep soccer kick

Steffen Willwacher, Katina Fischer, Gert Peter Brüggemann Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany

Friction properties of the face of a hand-held tennis racket

Biomechanical analysis of the medalists in the 10,000 metres at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics

Basketball free-throw rebound motions

EF 151 Exam 3 - Spring, 2017 Page 1 Copy 1

Exploring the relationship between the pressure of the ball and coefficient of restitution.

Biomechanical Comparison of Two Different Kicks in Soccer

A study on the effect of limb length and arm strength on the ball release velocity in cricket

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THE EFFICIENY OF THE START TECHNIQUES IN THE ROMANIAN COMPETITIVE SWIMMING

Artificial Soccer Turf What Shoes to Wear?

Biomechanics and Models of Locomotion

SKILL ANALYSIS SAMPLE F

ScienceDirect. Relating baseball seam height to carry distance

Analysis of Backward Falls Caused by Accelerated Floor Movements Using a Dummy

The Examination of Upper Limb Ambidexterity in Wrestling Snap Down Technique

Exploring the relationship between the pressure of the ball and coefficient of restitution.

Impact of target selection on front kick kinematics in taekwondo pilot study

BALL IMPACT KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS IN SOCCER KICKING

Analysis of Gait Characteristics Changes in Normal Walking and Fast Walking Of the Elderly People

INTERACTION OF STEP LENGTH AND STEP RATE DURING SPRINT RUNNING

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 112 (2015 )

Kinematics, Impulse, and Human Running

A study of football footwear bending stiffness

SPRINTING CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMEN S 100 METER FINALS AT THE IAAF WORLD CHAMPIONSHOPS DAEGU 2011

Original Article. Dependence of Football Repulsion on the Pressure Within This Sport

Original Article. Pressure dependence of handball repulsion within this sport

Variation of Nordic Classic Ski Characteristics from Norwegian national team athletes

An investigation of kinematic and kinetic variables for the description of prosthetic gait using the ENOCH system

Tuesday, 18 July 2006 TUA2-4: 12:00-12:15

Analysis of the swing motion on knuckling shot in soccer

Available online at ScienceDirect. Brendan Kays a, Lloyd Smith a *

Interesting sporting examples for motivating student learning in Mechanics. Stephen Lee (MEI) Abstract. Ball straight up in the air 20/07/2012

AERODYNAMICS OF SOCCER BALLS AND VOLLEYBALLS. lresearch Institute for Olympic Sports ]yvaskyla, Finland

Artifacts Due to Filtering Mismatch in Drop Landing Moment Data

Introduction. o 2. ! "#$ % & ' (" 4 Watt/m 2. Major

GROUND REACTION FORCE DOMINANT VERSUS NON-DOMINANT SINGLE LEG STEP OFF

07/08/2017. Goalkeepers (GK) in soccer. Goal kicking of soccer? Previous study. The goal kicking of professional GK. Introduction

Ground Forces Impact on Release of Rotational Shot Put Technique

The curve kick of a football I: impact with the foot

Golf Ball Impact: Material Characterization and Transient Simulation

SIMULTANEOUS RECORDINGS OF VELOCITY AND VIDEO DURING SWIMMING

APPLICATION OF FILMING AND MOTION ANALYSIS IN MOVEMENT STUDIES. Xie Wei Sports Medicine and Research Center, Singapore Sports Council, Singapore

Procedia Engineering Procedia Engineering 2 (2010)

Effect of Diameter on the Aerodynamics of Sepaktakraw Balls, A Computational Study

Available online at ScienceDirect. The 2014 conference of the International Sports Engineering Association

A COMPARISON OF SELECTED BIOMECHANICAL PARAMETERS OF FRONT ROW SPIKE BETWEEN SHORT SET AND HIGH SET BALL

Kinetics of the knife-hand strike used in power breaking in ITF Taekwon-do

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Technology 20 (2015 )

KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF SHOT PUT IN ELITE ATHLETES A CASE STUDY

Georgian University GEOMEDI. Abstract. In this article we perform theoretical analysis of long jumps with the purpose to find

University of Kassel Swim Start Research

Analysis of Movement

KASAMATSU VERSUS TSUKAHARA VAULT

ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher

Changes in speed and efficiency in the front crawl swimming technique at 100m track

An examination of try scoring in rugby union: a review of international rugby statistics.

End of Chapter Exercises

RELATIONSHIP OF SELECTED KINEMATIC VARIABLES WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF DOUBLE HANDEDBACKHAND IN TENNIS. Rajesh Kumar, M.P.Ed,

THREE DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS OF THE DIRECT FREE KICK IN SOCCER WHEN OPPOSED BY A DEFENSIVE WALL

Kinetic Energy Analysis for Soccer Players and Soccer Matches

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SELECTED TAKRAW BALLS IN MALAYSIA

Can the intensity of game load affect the shooting performance in basketball?

Biomechanical Analysis of a Sprint Start. Anna Reponen JD Welch

Unit 2 Review: Projectile Motion

Qualitative Analysis of Jumping Standing Long Jump Goals Note: Standing Long Jump

Hockey Scholars: Math and Science Test Study Guide-Answer Key

Study on the Influencing Factors of Gas Mixing Length in Nitrogen Displacement of Gas Pipeline Kun Huang 1,a Yan Xian 2,b Kunrong Shen 3,c

Biomechanical analysis of spiking skill in volleyball

Volume 2, Issue 5, May- 2015, Impact Factor: Structural Analysis of Formula One Racing Car

Biomechanical Analysis of Taekwondo Kicking Technique, Performance & Training Effects

How do we know if something is moving quickly or slowly? What about the speed of things we can t see? (think about internet speed ) Has our idea of

BIOMECHANICS OF A BACKHAND

Kinematics of the Mawashi Shoudan Kick as a Parameter of Designing a Training Program for Karate Juniors

D.O.I: Assistant Prof., University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

A MODEL FOR ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT BETWEEN A TENNIS RACKET AND A BALL

Development of a Simulation Model for Swimming with Diving Fins

A Pilot Study on Electromyographic Analysis of Single and Double Revolution Jumps in Figure Skating

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TAEKWONDO ROUNDHOUSE KICK EXECUTED BY THE FRONT AND BACK LEG - A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY

FORGET WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT CARBON FIBER PLATES. FOOTWEAR MATERIALS SHOULD WORK WITH THE FOOT, NOT AGAINST IT. 26 BONES 33 JOINTS 100+ MUSCLES

Gait analysis for the development of the biped robot foot structure

Sample Solution for Problem 1.a

Comparison of distance covered in paddle in the serve team according to performance level

EF 151 Exam #3, Spring, 2015 Page 1 of 5

Comparing the Performance of Baseball Bats

TOPIC OF THE MONTH FOR MARCH 2010 HOW CAN KICKERS AND PUNTERS INCREASE POWER?

Transcription:

International Conference on echanical Engineering Research (ICER23), -3 July 23 Bukit Gambang Resort City, Kuantan, Pahang, alaysia Organized By Faculty of echanical Engineering, Universiti alaysia Pahang Paper ID: P262 THE INFLUENCE OF FOOTBALL BOOT CONSTRUCTION ON BALL VELOCITY AND DEFORATION. A. Aris,*, Z. Taha, and. H. A. Hassan Centre for Sports Engineering, Faculty of echanical Engineering, Universiti alaysia Pahang, 266 Pekan, Pahang, alaysia * Email: azriaris9@yahoo.com Phone : +694246358 ; Fax : +6942422 ABSTRACT Running footwear research on the biomechanical properties of foot boots has received little scientific attention. Recently, modern and scientific foot boots has been developed that affords excellent control, shooting and running ability. Different construction of foot boots delivers different velocity and deformation of the. In this study, three commercially available foot boots were compared during kicking experiment in terms of, velocity and deformation of the. A subject performed three repetitive shots of the into the net for each foot boot model. The footer foot and the velocity were recorded using a high speed camera. From the recorded video, the kicking velocity, velocity and deformation were measured. Based on the foot and velocity data, the Coefficient of Restitution (COR) was calculated. The results obtained show the COR value varies with different boots (COR boota =.89, COR bootb =.59, COR bootc =.47) thus delivers different velocities at same kicking foot velocity (U = 4 ms - ). It is apparent that the Boot A was made with the best upper material (Teijin synthetic leather), design and also construction of the boot. Keywords: COR, Ball velocity, Foot boot, Soccer, Deformation INTRODUCTION Kicking is the most specific technique in foot, so it is appropriate to give considerable attention for our understanding of this skill from a biomechanical perspective. Researchers have widened their interest to consider the kick beginning from the way a player approaches the to the end of the flight. This field of study has encapsulated the overall technique and the influences of the upper body, support and pelvis on the kicking action, foot- impact and the influences of footwear and soccer s, launch characteristics and corresponding flight of the. When a is kicked, the is putting energy into the and the deformed. The part of the impacted by the foot was flattened for a few milliseconds. The energy going into the collision is the kinetic energy of the foot plus the stored energy in the deformed and the energy coming out is the kinetic energy of the. The conservation of energy causes the to go faster than the velocity of the foot

As kicking the is categorized as a collision mechanics (Sterzing and Hennig, 27), the velocity can be determined by using the law of the conservation of momentum and Coefficient of Restitution (COR). U U V V () V e U V U (2) From the above equations, the derivation of the actual formula for the velocity of the is (Lees et al., 993): V U ( e) (3) The velocity of the kicking (U ) is controlled by the player before contact. It has been proven that powerful kicking at impact results in differing velocities (Kellis and Katis, 27). The term ) relates to the muscles involved ( in the kick, and their strength at impact. The (+e) term relates to the rigidity of the foot at impact (Lees et al., 993). In this study, the effort to manipulate the mass of can be neglected as the player cannot gain the mass of while kicking to achieve maximum velocity. The focus of this study is on the foot boot construction where the COR (e), is the variable that can be measured to increase the velocity. The COR in kicking determine the transfer of velocity from the foot to the during the impact phase and is the ratio between relative velocity (V V ) after impact and the relative velocity before impact (Andersen et al., 25). The factors determining the COR are the mechanical properties of the foot and, i.e. stiffness, contact area and contact point. There are several studies that had been done by researchers to evaluate the best method for foot kicking. In Japan, a study claimed that for a more precise, the side-foot kick are the most suitable style while for a faster, the instep kick should be used (Shinkai et al., 28). It was found that the difference in the passive foot angular motion during impact was due to the difference of the impacting part of the two kicks and that foot motion of both side-foot kicking and instep kicking were different but the quality of the impact was similar for both type of kicking. For this current study, the toe kick is selected to be used for the kicking experiment. A study in Denmark (Andersen et al., 25) had found that the toe kick produce a larger COR compared to the instep kicking. Several kicking experiments had been done by researchers to evaluate the factors influence the velocity in kicking. Previous research had found that foot boot also contributed towards the velocity. In UK, a study was done to analyze whether foot boot mass has an effect on velocity (oschini and Smith, 22). Ten male university students participated in the study to kick a with three different masses of boots that was attached with three different lead plates (8.8 g, 26.6 g, and 356. g). They had concluded that the foot linear velocity does decrease with heavier boots but the velocity was not affected.

COR A research to quantify the influence of different shoe upper friction properties on velocity during kicking was done in Germany (Sterzing and Hennig, 27). They have used four boots with different friction properties of the upper materials during their experiment. In this study, they concluded that friction materials of foot boot uppers did not show any statistically significant influence in achieving different velocity during instep kicking. ETHODS One male university soccer player with no lower limb injury in the previous six month was chosen as the subject in this study (23 y; 74.3 kg;.77 m). Before the experiment, the subject was asked to perform warm up in order to avoid musculo-skeletal injuries during the session. A simple briefing session was carried out to make sure the subject was fully understood the experiment procedures. Three different type of foot boot was chosen for the kicking experiment (Nike ercurial Vapor VIII FG (Boot A); Adidas AdiPower Predator TRX FG (Boot B); Puma King Finale SL I FG (Boot C)). The participant had to perform three maximal toe kicks for each foot boot with a mandatory rest period between single kicks to avoid fatigue. The subjects were instructed to take three steps before kicking the into the net 2 m from the kick area. A green Adidas FIFA standard foot size 5 with diameter of 22 mm and weight 45 g was used for the experiment. The was inflated with a pressure of.65 bar. arkers were placed on the specific area on the foot and to aid in velocity and deformation measurement. The kicking action was captured using EPIX SV643C high-speed camera with 2,5 frames per second recording speed. The recorded video was than analyzed using the XCAP high-speed camera build-in software to calculate the foot kicking velocity (U ), foot after kicking velocity (V ), and also the velocity (V ). The COR of each foot boot was calculated using Eq. (2). The deformation on one selected kicking velocity was measured and grouped based on the type of foot boot. RESULTS The kicking action was captured using a high speed camera and analysed to get foot kicking velocity (U ), foot after kicking velocity (V ), and also the velocity (V ). The COR varies with the foot kicking velocity for each boot as shown in Fig to 3..5.75.69.89 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Foot velocity (ms-) Figure. Calculated COR for Boot A with different kicking velocity

COR COR COR.5.56.59.74 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 Foot velocity (ms-) Figure 2. Calculated COR for Boot B with different kicking velocity.5.47.78.83 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 Foot velocity (ms-) Figure 3. Calculated COR for Boot C with different kicking velocity From three calculated analysis above, Boot A recorded the highest COR value (.89) while Boot B and Boot C recorded.59 and.47 respectively at a specific selected kicking foot velocity (U = 4 ms - ) as shown in Fig 4..5.89.59.47 Boot type Figure 4. COR of each boot at 4 ms - kicking foot velocity The maximum deformation of the was measured using the XCAP build-in measuring software. The measured data was grouped into certain kicking velocity based on each foot boot model. The largest deformation was produced with Boot A ( 36 mm). The maximum deformation picture by boot type is shown in Fig 5. Figure 5. aximum deformation for each boot type A summary of the foot kicking velocity, maximum deformation, velocity and also COR are shown in the table.

Table. Experiment result summary Foot kicking velocity (ms - ) 4 4 4 ax deformation (mm) 36 3 26 Ball velocity (ms - ) 2.8 9.2 6.2 COR.89.59.47 CONCLUSION From the experiment, the COR value varies with different boots (COR boota =.89, COR bootb =.59, COR bootc =.47) thus delivers different velocities at same kicking foot velocity (U = 4 ms - ). A high COR results a high velocity and also deformation. It can be concluded that the Boot A was designed with the best upper material construction properties for toe kicking compared with other two foot boots. This type of upper material (Teijin synthetic leather) and the boot construction design with forefront thickness (t) of.88 mm would be the best to be use to produce high velocity with the lowest kicking velocity compared to the Boot B (full-grain calfskin, t = 2.59 mm) and Boot C (premium kangaroo leather, t =.75 mm). An experiment with larger sample sizes could be conduct in future to obtain precise and statistically analysis results. ACKNOWLEDGEENT The authors would like to thank Universiti alaysia Pahang and the inistry of Higher Education, alaysia for providing the funds for this research under the grant RDU27. REFERENCES ANDERSEN, T. B., KRISTENSEN, L. B., SØRENSEN, H. & CABRI, I. J. 25. Coefficient of Restitution (COR) in the toe and instep soccer kicks. Science and Foot V: The Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Science and Foot, 5, 73-77. KELLIS, E. & KATIS, A. 27. Biomechanical characteristics and determinants of instep soccer kick. Journal of Sports Science and edicine, 6. LEES, A., REILLY, T., CLARYS, J. P. & STIBBE, A. 993. Biomechanics of Foot. Science and Foot, 2. OSCHINI, A. & SITH, N. 22. EFFECT OF SHOE ASS ON SOCCER KICKING VELOCITY. 3th Annual Conference of Biomechanics in Sports, 5-53. SHINKAI, H., NUNOE, H., SUZUKI, H., SUITO, H., TSUJIOTO, N. & IKEGAI, Y. 28. COPARISON OF BALL IPACT CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN SIDE-FOOT AND INSTEP KICKING IN SOCCER. 26 International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports. STERZING, T. & HENNIG, E.. 27. The Influence Of Friction Properties Of Shoe Upper aterials On Kicking Velocity In Soccer. Journal of Biomechanics, 4, Supplement 2, S95.