Summary report on all harvested species on Patuxent Research Refuge from September 1 - January 31, 2017 Deer Harvest

Similar documents
STATUS OF WILDLIFE POPULATIONS, FALL 2008

This page intentionally blank

WEBLESS MIGRATORY GAME BIRD AND WATERFOWL SEASONS. DOVE (Mourning, White-winged and Eurasian Collared) SORA AND VIRGINIA RAIL

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

Deer Management Unit 122

Guided hunt in maryland

HUNTING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Deer Management Unit 127

Deer Management Unit 255

Deer Management Unit 152

CAMERA SURVEYS: HELPING MANAGERS AVOID THE PITFALLS

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

Hunting and Fishing Bag Limits and Seasons

Deer Management Unit 252

ODNR Division of Wildlife Proposed OAC Rule Changes (Effective )

Deer Management Unit 249

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

2014 Oregon Hunting Survey: An effort to better understand the choices Oregon hunters make regarding ammunition

Hunt ID: OK-WMDeerTurkeyQuailDuck-All-ETTARN-OW-EITHK Deer hunt for the Long Ranger, I didn t say Lone ranger, it is Long Ranger, as in shooting big w

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Wildlife. Contest Details: The contest shall be divided into team and individual activities. The following is a breakdown of the scoring to be used.

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Proposed Upland Game Bird Regulations

The Forty-Fourth Annual Maryland Migratory Game Bird Stamp Design Contest for

021 Deer Management Unit

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

U.S MINT STATE DUCKS SALE

Deer Management Unit 349

Migratory Bird Hunting Activity and Harvest During the 2008 and 2009 Hunting Seasons

Migratory bird hunting activity and harvest during the and hunting seasons

Migratory Bird Hunting Activity and Harvest During the 2009 and 2010 Hunting Seasons

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

2018 Season Waterfowl Hunter Survey Summary. Presented by Josh Richardson, Sr. Biologist Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

Lead Ammunition Survey Summary

Summary of the 2012 Off-Reservation Treaty Waterfowl Season

Deer Harvest Characteristics During Compound and Traditional Archery Hunts

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report, Nov. 16, 2017

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

Survey Techniques For White-tailed Deer. Mickey Hellickson, PhD Orion Wildlife Management

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

DMU 452 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission Proclamation Hunting Seasons and Bag Limits on Select National Wildlife Refuges and Other Federal Areas

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

How to Use Survey and Harvest Data

2018 South Carolina FFA Association State Wildlife Contest

2009 SMALL GAME HUNTER MAIL SURVEY

Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission Proclamation Hunting Seasons and Bag Limits on Select National Wildlife Refuges and Other Federal Areas

Proposed Upland Game Bird Regulations

Comprehensive Deer Management Program Montgomery County, MD. Rob Gibbs Natural Resources Manager M-NCPPC, Montgomery Dept of Parks

Acknowledgements Frank C. Bellrose & Daniel Holm

Women in Shooting Sports Survey Results

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

2015 WILDLIFE HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA

2009 ANNUAL REPORT Wells Wildlife Mitigation Program Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License Number Submitted by:

Analysis of the 1948, 1949, and 1950 Waterfowl Kill Samples in Iowa

2007 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

GAME BIRD PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UPLAND and MIGRATORY GAME BIRD SEASONS

FLATHEAD INDIAN RESERVATION

Migratory bird hunting activity and harvest during the 2005 and 2006 hunting seasons: Preliminary Estimates

Hunting License Information

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE AND HUNTING SEASONS

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report 10 October 2013

Hunting Seasons and Bag Limits

By: Stephanie Ray and Sarah Phipps

STATELINE RV PARK & MINI STORAGE 4X6 PICTURE

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

2009 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. January 24-28, 2019

2012 Minnesota Wolf Season Report

± ACRES HUNTING / RECREATIONAL LAND TALBOTTON, GEORGIA

We are looking forward to another successful season in 2017 and we will again be requiring the following:

DMU 487 Northern Multi-County Deer Management Unit

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

RANCH & FARM SALES PRESENTS

Deer Management in Maryland. Brian Eyler Deer Project Leader Maryland DNR

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. December 18-23, 2018

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

The Migratory Gamebird Regulatory Process. Early Waterfowling. Tim White TWRA Migratory GameBird/WMA Program Coordinator

PROCEDURE MANUAL of 6. Moose Harvest Management. This Procedure Replaces: None

MDWFP Aerial Waterfowl Survey Report. November 13-16, 2017

Controlled Bow Hunt Questions and Answers

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS CR SEASONS, BAG LIMITS, AND SPECIAL REGULATIONS FOR MIGRATORY GAME BIRDS

Transcription:

Patuxent Research Refuge Harvest Report 2016-2017 1 Summary report on all harvested species on Patuxent Research Refuge from September 1 - January 31, 2017 Deer Harvest Central Tract Compound Crossboloader Muzzle- 2016-2017 North Tract Lottery Schafer Farm South Tract Total Bow Shotgun Total Harvest 127 28 11 41 207 42 31 37 96 Buck Total 62 21 3 17 103 Doe Total 65 7 8 24 104 Antlered Total 38 13 1 7 59 Antlerless Total 89 15 10 34 148 Deer Population Estimates Population Estimation Methods Area Bucks Does Fawns Total Pop Density (Deer/sq. mi) North Tract 124 124 62 310 24.68 1. Formula based on harvest doe:buck ratio Central Tract 48 48 24 120 40.96 South Tract 34 34 17 85 21.09 Refuge Wide 206 206 103 515 26.38 North Tract 124 248 124 496 39.49 2. Formula based on 2:1 doe:buck ratio Central Tract 48 96 48 192 65.53 South Tract 34 68 34 136 33.75 Refuge Wide 206 412 206 824 42.21 3. Formula based on camera trapping doe:buck ratio Refuge Wide North Tract 331.33 4. Pop'n est from density extrapolation method (deer/sq mile Central Tract 77.29 * # sq miles) South Tract 106.31 Refuge Wide 514.94 2016-2017 deer population estimate = 515. Density is 26.38 deer/sq mi (515/19.5) for entire refuge. Based on doe:buck ratio from harvest. (1.01). See formulas below. State recommends density of 20 deer/square mile. Pop'n Estimation Formula: (Buck harvest x 2) + [(Buck harvest x 2) x (doe:buck ratio)] + ([(Buck harvest x 2) x (doe:buck ratio)] x 0.5) Density (Deer/Sq Mile) formula: Estimated Pop'n / square miles of refuge or tract. Because Central and South Tracts have low harvest numbers, population estimates or deer density for these 2 tracts unreliable. Deer Habitat Acres & Sq Mi by Tract Tract Deer Habitat Acres Square Miles (acres/640) North 8040 12.56 Central 1872 2.93 South 2579 4.03 Refuge 12491 19.52 Refuge-wide Doe:Buck Ratio Does Bucks << 1:1 doe:buck ratio based << 2:1

Patuxent Research Refuge Harvest Report 2016-2017 2 density for these 2 tracts unreliable. 104 103 1.010 2016-2017 Deer Population Estimate based on harvest doe:buck ratio 600 500 515 400 300 200 100 0 310 206 206 124 124 120 103 85 62 48 48 34 34 24 17 Bucks Does Fawns Total Pop North Tract Central Tract South Tract Refuge Wide

Patuxent Research Refuge Harvest Report 2016-2017 3 Waterfowl and Small Game Harvest Waterfowl Total Harvest Small Game Canada goose 30 Gray Squirrel 63 Mallard 20 Wood duck 33 Migratory Birds Hooded merganser Mourning Dove 22 Gadwall Ring-necked duck 1 Forest Game Bird American black duck Wild Turkey TBD Bufflehead Green-winged teal 2016-2017 Waterfowl Harvest 0 0 1 0 0 0 33 20 30 Canada goose Mallard Wood duck Hooded merganser Gadwall Ring-necked duck American black duck Bufflehead Green-winged teal

Patuxent Research Refuge Harvest Report 2016-2017 4 ANNUAL DEER POPULATION ESTIMATE AND DEER DENSITY FOR PATUXENT REFUGE. Below is the step by step process for calculating the population size and density for the deer at Patuxent Refuge. This should be done annually and then compared with results of five consecutive years to observe trends. We only perform these calculations for deer. Harvest rates for other species are too low to produce reliable estimates. A useful formula used by MD DNR for estimating population from harvest data is: bucks + does + fawns, however actual numbers harvested are not what is input in this formula. 1. To get bucks, multiply actual buck harvest x 2. This is called calculated bucks number. 2. To get does, multiply calculated bucks by your best doe:buck ratio (see choices below). The result will be the calculated does. 3. To get fawns, multiply the "calculated" does x 0.5. 4. Now you are ready to add calculated bucks + calculated does + calculated fawns to get estimated population totals. When presenting population estimates, be sure to indicate which doe/buck ratio it is based upon (actual harvest, camera trapping, or a 2:1 ratio). Because Central and South tracts have low harvest numbers, population estimates or deer density for those individual tracts are not reliable, so present only for illustration purposes. Better to assume that these tracts have similar density as North Tract where hunting is more intense and provides more data. 5. Where does a doe to buck ratio come from? It can be obtained from the year's harvest numbers, from camera trapping surveys ( if done that year), or the generalized 2:1 doe to buck ratio. You can try all three for comparison purposes, but we will use the either harvest ratio or camera trap ratio for reporting purposes however. If you have a ratio from camera trapping surveys, that is the best one to use because it is least biased. If that s not available, use the ratio obtained from the harvest data of the year. Keep in mind it too is biased because it derives from hunter choice. Finally there are generalized ratios based on national and regional demographic data. The general range-wide ratio for white tailed deer is 3:1, but there s a lot of mortality in bucks. Also, if you have a hunt program that conserves bucks, like a 15 rule, that would mean more bucks out there. So the 2:1 mig ht be a more realistic than 3:1. However, we will use the actual harvest ratio, or deer camera survey ratio. The standard ratio for Maryland for fawn calculation is 0.5 of does. 6. Now that you have population estimates, you can calculate deer density in deer per square miles (of deer habitat) for the refuge. and for each tract if desired. This is obtained by dividing the population estimate by the square miles of deer habitat of the refuge to get deer/sq mi. We have already subtracted acres of roads, parking lots, buildings and open water (i.e. non-deer habitat) from refuge total acres to obtain total deer habitat acres and have converted them to square miles for you, presented in the table below. Acres are divided by 640 to convert to square miles. Tract Deer Habitat Acres Square Miles (acres/640) North 8040 12.56 Central 1872 2.93 South 2579 4.03 Refuge 12491 19.52 7. Once you have a refuge wide density factor, you can multiply that factor by the area ( square miles) of any of the three tracts to get a per-tract population estimate. For example, assume refuge wide the deer density was 29.26/sq mile for the 2015-16 hunt season: and you want a population

Patuxent Research Refuge Harvest Report 2016-2017 5 population estimate. For example, assume refuge wide the deer density was 29.26/sq mile for the 2015-16 hunt season: and you want a population estimate for North Tract: 29.26 x 12.56 = 364 deer.

Patuxent Research Refuge Harvest Report 2016-2017 6 Example calculation: For 2015-2016 harvest at North Tract, where 109 bucks were taken, and using a doe to buck ratio of 0.49 (harvest data 81:164): (109* 2)+ (218 * 0.494) + (106.82 * 0.5) = 218 + 106.82 + 53.41 = 378.23 total population for North Tract To get the density or deer per square mile, divide the total deer by the square mileage of the property: 378.23 divided by 12.56* = 30.11 deer per square mile. *Based on 8040 acres of suitable deer acres, NT To calculate the refugewide population estimate: (164 * 2) + (328 * 0.494) + ( 162 *.5) 328 162 81 = 569.42 = 571 Refugewide density estimate: 571/19.52 = 29.26