Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Similar documents
Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Lake Zurich Police Department Traffic Safety Division 200 Mohawk Trail Lake Zurich, IL 60047

Overview. Updated pictures of the intersection are shown in Exhibits 1 thru 4, and the aerial photo provided by Google Maps is shown in Exhibit 5.

LINCOLNWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT

FEASIBILITY REPORT ON RED LIGHT CAMERAS PLACED AT CENTRAL AVENUE AND H STREET.

REPORT ON RED-LIGHT MONITORING SYSTEMS

Executive Summary. Albany Photo Red Light Enforcement Evaluation Page 2

Analysis of Solana Beach Red Light Camera Enforcement Program By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Executive Summary. Albany Photo Red Light Enforcement Evaluation Page 2

Analysis of the Red Light Camera Program in Garden Grove, CA By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

Red Light Camera Annual Report 2014

Analysis of the Red Light Camera Program in Los Alamitos, CA By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

Red-Light Safety Camera Program Analysis

Red Light Camera Increases Safety

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT SMILE, YOU RE ON RED LIGHT CAMERA

IRedwood i. rmmbr 2. Uti. Page 18. August Judge of the Superior Court Hall of Justice 400 County

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS CRASH DATA AND SAFETY ANALYSIS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DRAFT MAY 2016

2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Frequently Asked Questions Automated Red Light Enforcement Program Arlington, Texas

Comparison of Turning Movement Count Data Collection Methods for a Signal Optimization Study. White Paper

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

The total net revenue to the City for the previous four fiscal years was $255,856.

CITY OF JANESVILLE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE 8 NOVEMBER 2017

South Pasadena, FL Red-Light Safety Camera Program

Rock Road Transit. Northwest Plaza. Charles Rock Rd. Shopping Center Woodson & St. Center

Automated Traffic Enforcement Technology Guidelines

~~i~~pl"i~p ~Ou~t Of,~YD~ib~

LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT

Traffic Accident Data Processing

Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. The Honorable Board ofpolice Commissioners

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Ventura County Grand Jury

REPORT ON RED-LIGHT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL MONITORING SYSTEMS Third Annual Report. Prepared by the New Jersey Department of Transportation

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 26, 2013

THE VALUE OF CONFIRMATION LIGHTS AND THEIR UNINTENDED IMPACT ON DRIVER COMPLIANCE AND/OR DETERRENCE TO RUN A RED LIGHT

City of Sherwood Photo Red Light Program 2015 Legislative Report. 3/1/2015 City of Sherwood Police Captain Mark Daniel

Traffic Safety Study Report City Wide Intersection Study City of Coconut Creek Broward County, Florida

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Beaverton Police Department Traffic Safety Team

Effects of Traffic Signal Retiming on Safety. Peter J. Yauch, P.E., PTOE Program Manager, TSM&O Albeck Gerken, Inc.

2016 Annual Report. Work Zone Traffic Control. Bureau of Maintenance and Operations Highway Safety and Traffic Operations Division

City of Seattle Traffic Safety Camera Pilot Project. Evaluation Report. June 2007 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Walking in Traffic Violence. The pervasiveness of motor vehicle crashes with pedestrians in New York City

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Effectiveness of Red Light Cameras in Chicago: An Exploratory Analysis

Evaluation of LED-Outlined Backplates at Intersections With Light Rail Lines In Houston, Texas

Final Report. Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Right Turn Arrow at Silverbell Rd and Cortaro Rd. FHWA Experimentation #4-329(E)

Memorandum. TO: Town of Lysander Comprehensive Plan Update Committee

Bicycle Crashes. Number of Bike Crashes. Total Bike Crashes. are down 21% and severe bike crashes down 8% since 2013 (5 years).

SPEED MANAGEMENT FOR VISION ZERO

VDOT Crash Analysis Procedures for Roadway Safety Assessments

At intersections where RLR collisions decreased and rear end collisions increased, there was an overall 95.5% increase in collision severity.

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Marshall Metcalf, P.E. Dan Mlacnik, P.E. Division of Highways/District 6 February 24, 2015

HEADWAY AND SAFETY ANALYSIS OF SPEED LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES IN HIGHWAY WORK ZONES

Selected Intersection Crash Analysis for Prepared by: Rita Morocoima-Black Susan Chavarría Lucas Cruse

City of Edmonton Office of Traffic Safety

Mission: The mission of FARS is to make vehicle crash information accessible and useful so that traffic safety can be improved

WEST AVENUE AND NEW ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY PART III WEST AVENUE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized Intersections

ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE Traffic Section. Crash Data Analytics Vehicle vs Pedestrian/Cyclist For the INTERNATIONAL DRIVE DISTRICT

Safety and Active Transport. Dr. Maureen Carew, Medical Officer of Health Renfrew County and District Health Unit May 30, 2014

Use of Throw Distances of Pedestrians and Bicyclists as Part of a Scientific Accident Reconstruction Method 1

DART Bus Crash Analysis. typical scenarios associated with selected crash types

Traffic Calming Policy

Safety Assessment of Installing Traffic Signals at High-Speed Expressway Intersections

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 886, FOOTPATHS, PEDESTRIAN WAYS, BICYCLE PATHS, BICYCLE LANES AND CYCLE TRACKS. Chapter 886

Integrating Safety into the Transportation Decision Making Process

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

CARE AND VIGILANCE SAVE LIVES!

Capital Region Council of Governments

Review of Considerations and Requirements for Automated Enforcement

Crash Patterns in Western Australia. Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services

Characteristics of Traffic Accidents in Highway Work Zones

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Public Works Update Safety Campaign. Second Quarter Report

Appendix A: Before-and-After Crash Analysis of a Section of Apalachee Parkway

MEMORANDUM. City Constituents. Leilani Schwarcz, Vision Zero Surveillance Epidemiologist, SFDPH

AUTOMATED SPEED ENFORCEMENT: REDUCING SPEED TO SAVE LIVES

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2007 June 2011 (All ages) Mode of travel

San Francisco 2009 Collisions Report April 21, 2011

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Boston Post Road Design Feasibility Study

Military Road Safety Improvements

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN

Transcription:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/11-208.6 Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System: (k-7) A municipality or county operating an automated traffic law enforcement system shall conduct a statistical analysis to assess the safety impact of each automated traffic law enforcement system at an intersection following installation of the system. The statistical analysis shall be based upon the best available crash traffic and other date, and shall cover a period of time before and after installation of the system sufficient to provide a statistically valid comparison of safety impact. The statistical analysis shall be consistent with professional judgment and acceptable industry practice. The statistical analysis also shall be consistent with the data required for valid comparisons of before and after conditions and shall be conducted within a reasonable period following the installation of the automated traffic law enforcement system. The statistical analysis required by this subsection (k-7) shall be made available to the public and shall be published on the website of the municipality or county. If the statistical analysis for the 36-month period following installation of the system indicates that there has been an increase in the rate of accidents at the approach to the intersection monitored by the system, the municipality or county shall undertake additional studies to determine the cause and severity of the accidents, and may take any action that it determines is necessary or appropriate to reduce the number or severity of the accidents at that intersection. A Red Light Running (RLR) Photo Enforcement System was installed at the intersection of on February 26, 2010 after finding limited success with other attempted measures to promote safer driving and improve compliance with traffic laws. The following statistical analysis was performed through 2015. Calendar year 2016 was not included as the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) has not yet completed collecting all data. The statistical analysis will be updated annually, as collected data becomes available from IDOT.

Blue Island, IL RLR Photo Enforcement System monitors violations occurring on the northbound approach of the intersection RLR Photo Enforcement System installed: February 26, 2010

, Northbound Approach, Southbound Approach

, Eastbound Approach, Westbound Approach

Average Daily Traffic Data was obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation s website www.gettingaroundillinois.com. (Northbound/Southbound) 13,000 (2002) 10,900 (2006) 8,100 (2010) 5,100 (2014)

Average Daily Traffic Data was obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation s website www.gettingaroundillinois.com. (Eastbound) 30,000 (2002) 28,700 (2006) 28,900 (2010) 11,400 (2014)

Average Daily Traffic Data was obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation s website www.gettingaroundillinois.com. (Westbound) 30,000 (2006) 28,700 (2014) 28,900 (2010) 27,300 (2014)

Crash History and Analysis Table 1 includes crash data obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation, detailing angle, turning, rear-end, and other type crashes occurring at the intersection pre/post RLR Photo Enforcement System installation. ALL INTERSECTION APPROACHES Crashes Rear-End (% of Angle (% of Turning (% of Other (% of Total 2007 5 35.7% 2 14.3% 6 42.8% 1 7.1% 14 2008 5 55.5% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 2 22.2 9 2009 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 3 42.8% 0 0.0% 7 Total: 14 46.7% 3 10.0% 10 33.3% 3 10.0% 30 2007-2009 Average: 4.7 1.0 3.3 1.0 10.0 RLR Camera Installation: February 26, 2010 2010 6 85.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 7 2011 6 60.0% 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 1 10.0% 10 2012 7 77.8% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 9 2013 4 57.1% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 7 2014 7 70.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 10 2015 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 10 Total: 27 58.7% 5 10.9% 8 17.4% 6 13.0% 46 2011-2015 Average: 5.4 1.0 1.6 1.2 9.2 Other indicates the following: Pedestrian, Pedal Cyclist, Fixed Object, Sideswipe, Head-On and Unknown Table 1 DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation, based upon information derived from multiple sources. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s). Additionally, for coding years 2015 to present, the Bureau of Data Collection uses the exact latitude/longitude supplied by the investigating law enforcement agency to locate crashes. Therefore, location data may vary in prior years, since the data prior to 2015 was physically located by bureau personnel. Given the subjective nature of the reporting process, the modifications in the incident locating protocols and the changes to the crash reporting thresholds effective 2009, the City of Blue Island acknowledges the potential for discrepancies in the final conclusions drawn.

Crash History and Analysis (continued) Table 2 includes crash data obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation, detailing angle, turning, rear-end, and other-type crashes occurring at the intersection involving the northbound approach only, pre/post RLR Photo Enforcement System installation. NORTHBOUND APPROACH ONLY (PHOTO ENFORCED APPROACH) Crashes Rear-End (% of Angle (% of Turning (% of Other (% of Total 2007 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 4 57.1% 1 14.3% 7 2008 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 2009 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 Total: 5 33.3% 2 13.3% 6 40.0% 2 13.3% 15 2007-2009 Average: 1.7 0.7 2.0 0.7 5.0 RLR Camera Installation: February 26, 2010 2010 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 3 2011 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 2012 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2013 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 2014 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 5 2015 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 5 Total: 5 31.2% 4 25.0% 4 25.0% 3 18.7% 16 2011-2015 Average: 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 3.2 Other indicates the following: Pedestrian, Pedal Cyclist, Fixed Object, Sideswipe, Head-On and Unknown Table 2 DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation, based upon information derived from multiple sources. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s). Additionally, for coding years 2015 to present, the Bureau of Data Collection uses the exact latitude/longitude supplied by the investigating law enforcement agency to locate crashes. Therefore, location data may vary in prior years, since the data prior to 2015 was physically located by bureau personnel. Given the subjective nature of the reporting process, the modifications in the incident locating protocols and the changes to the crash reporting thresholds effective 2009, the City of Blue Island acknowledges the potential for discrepancies in the final conclusions drawn.

Comparison of annual averages shows the total number of crashes decreasing by 8.0% at the intersection for all approaches and by 36.0% on the northbound (photo enforced) approach post-camera installation. The US Department of Transportation Project Development and Design Manual states that turning, angle or head-on crashes have a number of probable crash causes, to include: Large volumes of left /right turns Large total intersection volume Excessive speed on approaches Inadequate traffic control devices Poor visibility of signals While red light cameras cannot truly decrease the volume of cars entering the intersection, speed and proximity of vehicles entering an intersection or the amount of turning traffic volume, red light cameras and red light camera photo enforcement warning signs have the ability to reduce traffic crashes and improve compliance with traffic control devices.

Adjudication Experience RLR camera violations are contested and adjudicated through an administrative hearing conducted monthly. Adjudication data for the City s Automated Enforcement Program is shown below in Table 3. The data presented below only reflects adjudication activity beginning August 2015, when the City contracted with a new vendor. Data from the previous Red Light Camera provider is no longer available. Data compiled is not intersection specific, rather totals for the program as a whole. CITY OF BLUE ISLAND ADJUDICATION FOR AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM YEAR /TOTALS LIABLE NOT LIABLE 2015 134 50 2016 397 152 2017 To Date* 149 77 TOTAL: 680 279 *Adjudication data provided thru July 2017 Table 3 The high quality video footage and photographic evidence produced by the enforcement system is a contributing factor in a majority of the contested RLR violations being upheld by the Hearing Officer. The police officers assigned to review and approve/reject potential violations are vigilant in applying the same officer discretion and criteria they would if issuing an in-person citation, resulting in only highly prosecutable violations being mailed out.