Glen Echo Lake Weed Biomass Study

Similar documents
Aquatic Plants of the Three Lakes

BIG MARINE LAKE, WASHINGTON COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT

Table 1. Physical Characteristics of Your Lake.

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Cates Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Assessing the Risk of AIS in Waters with no Public Boat Access Hennepin County 2018

2015 Macrophyte Survey Results

Kerr Lake Vegetation Survey. October November Report submitted by NC State University. Background

Big Fish Lake Association Marcellus, MI 49067

FACT SHEET I. LOCATION

DRAFT AMENDMENT 1. Introduction

REQUEST FOR BID FOR DIVER ASSISTED SUCTION HARVESTING

Chateaugay Lakes Milfoil Control Program

GRASS CARP SPAWNING IN LAKE ERIE TRIBUTARIES: WHEN AND WHERE?

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

2016 Field Survey Oneida Lake / Three Mile Bay WMA SLELO-PRISM Early Detection Surveillance

Wetland Habitat Flashcards. Wetlands

Table 1. Physical Characteristics of Your Lake.

Aquatic Plant Management and Importance to Sport Fisheries

LAKE PLEASANT Steuben County 2006 Fish Management Report. Larry A. Koza Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Tittabawassee River Assessment. Miles. Gladwin Smallwood Impoundment. Harrison. Clare. Midland. Mt. Pleasant. St. Louis. Saginaw.

MEMORANDUM Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District

Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012

Introduction: JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Habitat Stewardship Series n e w h a m p s h i r e w i l d l i f e a c t i o n p l a n

Eurasian Water-milfoil Bed Mapping Survey Red Lake (WBIC: ) Douglas County, Wisconsin

EcoLogic Memorandum. TO: Ben Brezell; EDR FROM: Mark Arrigo RE: Possible Impacts of Dredging Snooks Pond DATE: 6/4/07

Water-level change effects on northern pike spawning and nursery habitat and reproductive success in Rainy Lake and Namakan Reservoir, Minnesota

Aquatic Vegetation of Bass Lake

MISSISSIPPI MAKEOVER A Plan for Restoration, Just Around the Bend

Winter Drawdown Issues of Concern

Annex B SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. Table of Contents. Scientific Names of Select Plants and Animals. Fish species collected in Curwensville Lake

A Guide to Selected Invasive Non-native Aquatic Species in Massachusetts

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Ebert Lake 8 Lime Lake - 13

2014 Threatened and Endangered Fish Survey of. East Loon Lake and West Loon Lake. Lake County, Illinois

Delaware Estuary Aquatic Nuisance Species of Concern Summary of ANS Survey, Summer 2002 Kirstin Wakefield, DEP & Ann Faulds, PA Sea Grant

AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN

Dexter Marsh Wildlife Management Area and Muskellunge Creek: Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Assessment

Osoyoos Lake Aquatic Plant Mapping

Lake LeAnn 2018 Fish Survey

Onondaga Lake Fishery: 2011 Fact Sheet

BASELINE SURVEY OF AQUATIC PLANTS LAKE MURRAY, SC 2007

Aquatic Invasive Plant Surveys in the BLM Medford District During 2012

feeding - clear moderate-sized shallow streams with moderate vegetation spawning - nests in gravel, sand, or hard rock substrate

Pond Management. Dan Lekie Agriculture & Natural Resource Agent K-State Research & Extension Johnson County

Oklahoma Water Resources Board

Healthy lakes add value to our communities. They provide a place to relax and recreate,

LITTLE WHITE OAK Knox County 2006 Fish Management Report. Debbie King Assistant Fisheries Biologist

2015 Starry Stonewort Inspection and Assessment Report: Lake Koronis, Stearns County MNDNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources

Warmwater Fisheries Assessments 2014

An Assessment of the Fish Community in Lake Acworth

Upper/Lower Owl Creek Reservoir

Transforming Chadwick Lake

Hazardous Paths to the Columbia Gorge

Countermeasures against Alien Fishes (Largemouth Bass and Bluegill) in Lake Biwa

Bottom habitat mapping in Plateliai lake applying remote underwater video techniques

Bear Lake. Final Results Portage County Lake Study. March 31, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Portage County Staff and Citizens

Fisheries Survey of Saratoga Lake

KICKAPOO LAKE Shakamak State Park Sullivan, Greene, and Clay Counties 2009 Fish Management Report. David S. Kittaka Fisheries Biologist

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

I Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I

Pow Wow Papakeechie Protective Association Newsletter-Spring 2017

Aquatic Invasive Species in Muskoka. March 2010

Waubee Lake Kosciusko County Fish Management Report 2006

MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc.

Student Worksheet: River Health and Indicator Species

Cat Island Chain Restoration

2011 Haha Lake Northern Pike Control

Waupaca Chain O' Lakes Anonymous Stakeholder Survey Surveys Distributed: 804 Surveys Returned: 432 Response Rate: 54% Chain Property

Arizona Game and Fish Department Region VI Fisheries Program

SKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

CARL BLACKWELL LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Friends of the Detroit River Habitat Restoration Project Update

AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES EARLY DETECTORS A HOW-TO GUIDE

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Mud Bay SLELO-PRISM Water Chestnut & Hydrilla Surveillance 2012

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Goldfish Removal Millar s Pond. Resort Municipality of Whistler

Brant Lake Aquatic Invasive Species Training Brant Lake, NY July 30 th, 2010

PERFORMANCE REPORT. As Required by FEDERAL AID IN SPORT FISH RESTORATION ACT TEXAS FEDERAL AID PROJECT F-30-R-34

Creation of Fish and Wildlife Habitat on the Closed Salmon Harbour Mine in Minto, NB

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

Activity Title: Don t Stop for Hitchhikers

Lake Murray Fisheries Management Plan

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

Boat electrofishing survey of Lake Rotokaeo, Hamilton

Our foundation introduce Nature and conservation in Lake Izunuma Uchinuma.

UNIVERSITY OF. ILL»hOlS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN NATURAL HIST. SURVEY

Lake Winnibigoshish Fisheries Information Newsletter

Factors Affecting the Reproduction of Bluegill Bream and Largemouth Black Bass in Ponds

BENSON PARK POND FISH SPECIES

Lake information report

Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Aquatic Plant Management (APM)

DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Fisheries and Lake Management Planning. CAP Mtg Nov21,2012 Brett Tregunno Aquatic Biologist, Kawartha Conservation

Name of Applicant Phone Number # Mailing Address. City State Zip

Transcription:

Weed Biomass Study Charlton, Massachusetts PREPARED FOR: Glen Echo Improvement Association PO Box 578 01508 PREPARED BY: ESS Group, Inc. 100 Fifth Avenue, 5th Floor Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 ESS Project No. G239-000 November 2017 www.essgroup.com

SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 AQUATIC VEGETATION... 1 3.0 FISH AND WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT... 2 3.1 Birds... 3 3.2 Fish... 3 3.3 Reptiles and Amphibians... 3 3.4 Invertebrates... 4 3.5 Wetland Habitat... 4 4.0 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS... 5 TABLES Table A Species Detected During Aquatic Vegetation Survey on September 27, 2017 Table B Species Observed During the Fish and Wildlife Assessment on September 27, 2017 Table C Dominant Wetland Vegetation FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Aquatic Vegetation Cover Aquatic Vegetation Biomass Biomass of Waterwort (Elatine sp.) Biomass of Spikerush (Eleocharis sp.) Biomass of Golden Hedge-hyssop (Gratiola aurea) Biomass of Low Milfoil (Myriophyllum humile) Biomass of Stonewort (Nitella sp.) Biomass of Brittle Naiad (Najas minor) Biomass of Thinleaf Pondweed (Potamogeton pusillus) Biomass of Common Bladderwort (Utricularia macrorhiza) Biomass of Water Celery (Vallisneria americana) Biomass of Sagittaria sp. Mussel Locations This document or any part may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording without the express written consent of ESS Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

1.0 INTRODUCTION is currently drawn down approximately four feet in the winter to help manage aquatic nuisance plants. ESS Group, Inc. prepared this study to provide additional information on the lake s flora and fauna to determine the consequences of increased winter drawdown beyond four feet. 2.0 AQUATIC VEGETATION ESS conducted an aquatic vegetation survey of Glen Echo Lake on September 27, 2017. ESS used a submeter accurate GPS receiver to navigate to 100 sampling locations and assessed the depth and aquatic vegetation present at each point. Individual species biomass, overall plant cover (Figure 1), and overall plant biomass (Figure 2) were assessed at every sampling point. For the purpose of this study, ESS defines biomass as the amount of water column filled by the aquatic plant species (not the weight of the plants, although the two would be linked). Plant rake with common bladderwort and invasive fanwort. The aquatic plant community was dominated by waterwort (Elatine sp.), spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), golden hedge-hyssop (Gratiola aurea), low milfoil (Myriophyllum humile), stonewort (Nitella sp.), brittle naiad (Najas minor), thinleaf pondweed (Potamogeton pusillus), common bladderwort (Utricularia macrorhiza), water celery (Vallisneria Americana), and arrowhead (Sagittaria sp.). Biomass maps for each dominant species are found in Figures 3 through 12. Brittle naiad and fanwort (Cabomba caroliniana) were the only aquatic invasive species found in the lake during the survey. All species found during the survey are listed in Table A. Table A. Species Detected During Aquatic Vegetation Survey on September 27, 2017 Scientific Name Common Name Dominant Growth Type Native or Exotic Drawdown Response* Brasenia schreberi Watershield Floating Native D Cabomba caroliniana Fanwort Submerged Exotic D Callitriche sp. Water Starwort Submerged Native Ceratophyllum demersum Coontail Submerged Native D Elatine spp. Waterwort Submerged Native Eleocharis sp. Spikerush Submerged Native V Filamentous Algae Submerged Native Fontinalis sp. Aquatic Moss Submerged Native V Gratiola aurea Golden Hedge-hyssop Submerged Native Isoetes sp. Qillwort Submerged Native Lemna sp. Duckweed Floating Native NC Ludwigia palustris Marsh Seedbox Submerged Native Myriophyllum humile Low Milfoil Submerged Native D Myriophyllum sp. Submerged Native D Najas flexilis Bushy Naiad Submerged Native I

Weed Biomass Study November 2017 Scientific Name Common Name Dominant Growth Type Native or Exotic Drawdown Response* Najas minor Brittle Naiad Submerged Exotic I Nitella sp. Stonewort Submerged Native V Nuphar lutea variegata Yellow Water Lily Floating Native D Nymphoides cordata White Floating Heart Floating Native D Pontederia cordata Pickerelweed Emergent Native Potamogeton epihydrus Floating-leaf Pondweed Floating Native I Potamogeton nodosus Longleaf pondweed Floating Native I Potamogeton perfoliatus Clasping-leaf Pondweed Submerged Native I Potamogeton pusillus Thinleaf Pondweed Submerged Native I Potamogeton robbinsii Robbins' pondweed Submerged Native D Sagittaria sp. Arrowhead Submerged Native I Sparganium Bur-reed Emergent Native Typha sp. Cattail Emergent Native I Utricularia macrorhiza Common Bladderwort Submerged Native Vallisneria americana Water Celery Submerged Native V * The symbols I represents an increase, D represents a decrease, V represents varies, and NC indicates no change based on ESS experience with winter drawdowns and a review of literature available including the Massachusetts Generic Environmental Impact Report for Lake Management and other sources pertaining to winter drawdown. 3.0 FISH AND WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT ESS also conducted a very limited fish and wildlife assessment on September 27, 2017 to help assess the potential for increased impacts from additional drawdown. Table B lists all species observed during the fish and wildlife assessment. Table B. Species Observed During the Fish and Wildlife Assessment on September 27, 2017 Birds Fish Reptiles Scientific Name Common Name Native or Exotic Anas platyrhynchos Mallard Duck Native Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron Native Lepomis macrochirus Bluegill Exotic Micropterus dolomieu Smallmouth Bass Exotic Micropterus salmoides Largemouth Bass Exotic Perca flavescens Yellow Perch Native Chrysemys picta Painted Turtle Native 2

Weed Biomass Study November 2017 Invertebrates 3.1 Birds Scientific Name Common Name Native or Exotic Elliptio sp. Elliptio Native Bryozoa Native Viviparus georgianus Banded Mystery Snail Exotic The only birds observed during the survey were mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) and great blue heron (Ardea herodias). Both are common and native to New England lakes. These species depend on the lake habitat for foraging. Ducks rely directly on aquatic plants and their seeds for food, whereas herons would rely principally on fish and aquatic invertebrates. Under a winter drawdown, it is anticipated that seed forming aquatic plants would generally increase and thus this would seem to support the conclusion that a drawdown would be of benefit to foraging ducks. As long as the drawdown is conducted in a manner consistent with the state s guidance on winter drawdowns, there should not be a negative impact to the avian community supported by the lake. 3.2 Fish Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), largemouth bass (M. salmoides), and yellow perch (Perca flavescens) were observed during the wildlife survey. Bluegill were particularly abundant and observed throughout the lake. In addition, roughly half a dozen potential bluegill spawning beds observed in northern end of lake. Abundant young of the year smallmouth bass were observed in the shallow littoral zone in the northern end of the lake. Larger largemouth bass and yellow perch were observed in the southern and central portions of the lake. Sunfish, bass, and perch represent a typical New England warmwater fish community. This community relies on shallow sand and gravelly areas for spawning during the spring to complete its life cycle within the lake. Winter drawdowns performed in a manner that allow for the water levels to be restored in time for the spring spawning season would not be expected to impact the fish community within the lake. In fact, the lowering of water levels can actually enhance this fish community s ability to spawn as it would be expected that the drawdown would help to move finer sediments out of the shallow water and toward the central portion of the lake. 3.3 Reptiles and Amphibians The only reptile observed during the survey were painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Painted turtles were observed lounging on rocks and logs in the northern end of the lake. Amphibians were not observed or heard during the wildlife survey. However, common amphibians likely present in the area would be those typical of central Massachusetts and are probably include spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer), green frogs (Lithobates clamitans), and bullfrogs (L. catesbeianus). Elliptio mussels were found throughout the southern and central portions of the lake. 3

Weed Biomass Study November 2017 3.4 Invertebrates Elliptio mussels (Elliptio sp.) and banded mystery snails (Viviparus georgianus) were observed in the southern and central portions of the lake. One Bryozoan colony was observed on the base of a cattail bed in the northern portion of the lake. Elliptio were observed at depths up to roughly 10 feet and at densities less than one per square foot (Figure 13). Elliptio are native to New England, but banded mystery snails are not. Banded mystery snails are native to the southeastern United States and may compete with native snails for food and habitat. These snails may have been introduced by boats and equipment or released from home aquariums. Three banded mystery snails were found during the wildlife survey and are not thought to be abundant in the lake. Drawdowns can have an impact on Three exotic banded mystery snails were found in the southern and central portions of the lake. mollusks, particularly the less motile species such as mussels. If the drawdown is conducted in a manner in which the water levels are lowered slowly, even the slow-moving mussel can effectively relocate with the receding waters in all but the most flatly sloped shoreline areas. 3.5 Wetland Habitat ESS also assessed the wetland areas adjacent to the lake to assess available habitat. Wetland areas adjacent to the lake were exclusively located on the undeveloped, northern end of the lake. The wetland habitat was dominated by native cattail (Typha sp.). Tussock sedge (Carex stricta), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), and pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata) were also present along the shoreline. No exotic common reed (Phragmites australis) or purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) were observed. Land adjacent to the wetland area at the northern tip of the lake was dominated by red maple (Acer rubrum). Table C lists dominant wetland vegetation present adjacent to Glen Echo lake. The wetlands associated with the lake appear to be healthy and dominated by native species despite the previous drawdown activities at the lake. This would support a conclusion that these wetlands supported hydrologically by groundwater and surface flows moving towards the lake through the wetlands or the soils within the wetlands rather than relying solely upon the water level within the lake to support their existence. Winter drawdowns during the period when these plants are dormant would not be expected to impact the wetland community. Wetland areas were confined to the undeveloped in northern end of the lake and dominated by native cattail. 4

Weed Biomass Study November 2017 Table C. Dominant Wetland Vegetation Scientific Name Common Name Native or Exotic Typha sp. Cattail Native Solidago sp. Goldenrod Native Carex stricta Tussock Sedge Native Pontederia cordata Pickerelweed Native Acer rubrum Red Maple Native 4.0 MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The results of this survey indicate that the lake has not experienced significant impacts from prior winter water level drawdowns. This conclusion is supported by the presence of a relatively diverse plant community, healthy perimeter wetlands, the presence of a reproducing warmwater fish community, and an abundance of native mussels. The mapping that ESS has conducted as part of this study illustrate where each of the dominant plant species within the lake occur and should help regulators see where certain plant species would be likely to proliferate with increased winter drawdown levels. Similarly, it is also evident where other species may be reduced from the increased drawdown levels. Most species of plants that are desirable for fish cover and duck foraging, such as the various Potamogeton species, would be expected to increase in abundance due to increased winter drawdown depths. In contrast, species such milfoil and the exotic species fanwort which spread principally through vegetative fragmentation, would be likely to decrease. As with any drawdown, the management action is not specific and cannot be expected to target only undesirable species. In fact, the exotic species, including brittle naiad, may actually increase within the lake in response to winter drawdown. Although ESS does not anticipate any negative impacts to the overall flora and fauna associated with the lake in response to an increased drawdown, it is our recommendation that the effects of the drawdown be monitored annually. Annual mapping of the aquatic plants in a manner similar to what was conducted to support this baseline study would enable scientists to document any unexpected proliferation in exotic species or other observed negative impacts to the ecosystem so that they could be addressed proactively before the system becomes unbalanced or shifts beyond what can easily be corrected by simply reducing the degree of drawdown going forward. 5

www.essgroup.com Figures

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig01_PlantCover.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE FREIGHT HOUSE CITY DEPOT SCOTT SCOTT D RI V E MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ELLIOTT ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT HOLLYWOOD BROOKFIELD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. % Plant Cover at Sample Location 26% - 5 51% - 75% 76% - 10 Aquatic Vegetation Cover Figure 1

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig02_Biomass.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE FREIGHT HOUSE CITY DEPOT SCOTT SCOTT D RI V E MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ELLIOTT ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT HOLLYWOOD BROOKFIELD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. % Plant Biomass at Sample Location 26% - 5 51% - 75% Aquatic Vegetation Biomass Figure 2

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig03_BiomassElatine.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Elatine % Plant Biomass at Sample Location Biomass of Waterwort (Elatine sp.) Figure 3

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig04_BiomassEleocharis.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Eleocharis % Plant Biomass at Sample Location Biomass of Spikerush (Eleocharis sp.) Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Figure 4

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig05_BiomassGratiolaAurea.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Gratiola aurea % Plant Biomass at Sample Location Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Biomass of Golden Hedgehyssop (Gratiola aurea) Figure 5

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig06_BiomassMhumile.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Myriophyllum humile % Plant Biomass at Sample Location 26% - 5 Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Biomass of Low Milfoil (Myriophyllum humile) Figure 6

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig07_BiomassNitella.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Nitella % Plant Biomass at Sample Location Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Biomass of Stonewort (Nitella sp.) Figure 7

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig08_BiomassNajasMinor.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Najas minor % Plant Biomass at Sample Location 26% - 5 Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Biomass of Brittle Naiad (Najas minor) Figure 8

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig09_BiomassPpusillus.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Potamogeton pusillus % Plant Biomass at Sample Location 26% - 5 Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Biomass of Thinleaf Pondweed (Potamogeton pusillus) Figure 9

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig10_BiomassUtriculariaMacrorhiza.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Utricularia macrorhiza % Plant Biomass at Sample Location 25% - 5 Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Biomass of Common Bladderwort (Utricularia macrorhiza) Figure 10

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig11_BiomassVallisneria Americana.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Vallisneria americana % Plant Biomass at Sample Location Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Biomass of Water Celery (Vallisneria americana) Figure 11

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig12_BiomassSagittaria.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Sagittaria % Plant Biomass at Sample Location Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Biomass of Sagittaria sp. Figure 12

OSGOOD PARK Path: J:\G239-000 Glen Echo Improvement Association - 2017 Biomass Study\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\G239_000_GlenEcho_Fig13_Mussels.mxd NORTH STURBRIDGE CITY DEPOT MAPLE OAK WESTVIEW ASH OSGOOD BROOKSIDE STEPHENS VINE CITY DEPOT BROOKFIELD HOLLYWOOD STEVENS PARK *Detail Contour (2' Interval) Mussels at Sample Location No Yes Note: elevation on date of survey (9/27/2017) was 231.83', 2-inches below the top of the spillway. Mussel Locations Figure 13