Explosive Fittings Testing

Similar documents
Study on Intensity of Blast Wave Generated from Vessel Bursting by Gas Explosion

Development of a Shock Loading Simulation Facility

Client Report : Air Overpressure from Le Maitre Flash Report Effects

A Study of Pressure Safety Valve Response Times under Transient Overpressures

Engineering Report Crash Safety (Impulse) Shock Test. Crystal Group, Inc. for. Prepared by. Phillip M. Toftely, Test Engineer.

BLOCKAGE LOCATION THE PULSE METHOD

[Graphic Division] 10

EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SECONDARY BEHIND ARMOR EFFECTS INSIDE A COMPARTMENT PERFORATED BY A KINETIC ENERGY PROJECTILE

Flow in a shock tube

Series Environmental Chambers

TEST REPORT. Solamatrix Inc. GLASS-GARD GGL1200 Multi-ply Window Film and Wetglaze Anchoring System on Single 6mm (1/4 ) Annealed Glass.

Analysis of Pressure Rise During Internal Arc Faults in Switchgear

Type Testing Procedure for Crankcase Explosion Relief Valves

Dräger PAS AirPack 1 Compressed Air Breathing Apparatus

The Protection of Silos From Over. Pressurisation During Filling

AN ANALYSIS ON HIGH PRESSURE DYNAMIC CALIBRATORS USED IN THE DEFENSE AREAS

Pilot HON 625. Entwurf. Product information. serving the gas industry worldwide

AC : MEASUREMENT OF HYDROGEN IN HELIUM FLOW

Pneumatic high-pressure controller Model CPC7000

Joint industry project on foam

Impulsive Pressurization of Neuronal Cells. M. Nienaber, J.S. Lee, R. Feng and J.Y. Lim

Sense Element Pump Ripple Fatigue

HYDROGEN RELEASES IGNITED IN A SIMULATED VEHICLE REFUELLING ENVIRONMENT

SEMATECH Provisional Test Method for Pressure Cycle Testing Filter Cartridges Used in UPW Distribution Systems

SSI Solaris 150 RTA Revision /27/2016 Page 1 of 9. SSI Solaris 150 RTA

RM-80 respiration monitor

Bomb Blast Mitigation Test

New Findings for the Application of Systems for Explosion- Isolation with Explosion Venting

SPECIFICATION FOR REPEATED LOAD TRIAXIAL (RLT) TESTING FOR PAVEMENT MATERIALS

SPIRIT III Radiometer Saturation Effect

Lab 4: Pressure Gradients over a Wing

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION DESCRIPTION OF TEST SAMPLE TEST RIG GENERAL ARRANGEMENT TEST SEQUENCE...7

The API states the following about tube rupture for a shell-and-tube heat exchangers:

Specification & scope of work for Multi Component Gas Separation test Rig

MODELLING OF FUME EXTRACTORS C. R.

Pneumatic high-pressure controller Model CPC7000

Technical Review Agenda

CASH VALVE TYPE KP BACK PRESSURE VALVES

PTB Ex PT Scheme. Procedure Instruction of program Explosion Pressure - Test Round 2017

WL16 WATER LEVEL LOGGERS Submersible pressure transducer and USB datalogger combination

New Highly Productive Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing Machine for Aluminium Plates for Aircraft Applications

MITIGATE GAS COMBUSTION IN CASE OF INTERNAL ARC

ASSE International Product (Seal) Listing Program

Pressure Regulators. Operating Instructions. Instrumentation

Subsonic Wind Tunnel 300 mm

Summary of Substantive Changes between the 2012 and 2018 editions of CSA B125.3 Plumbing Fittings

STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATION OF CNG COMPOSITE CYLINDERS BY ACOUSTIC EMISSION MONITORING

XSL-360-5E. UV LED 5 mm TECHNICAL DATA. Absolute Maximum Ratings (T a =25 C) Specifications (If=20mA, T a =25 C) Drawing

Electronic Volume Correctors

Active Hydrophore System AHS-01

Lab #4 Pipe Flow, Minor and Major Losses, and Walking in Osborne Reynolds Shoes CEE 331 Fall 2006

Best Practices for Installation of Gaseous Sample Pumps

3 GALLON, OILLESS PANCAKE COMPRESSOR INSTRUCTIONS. Item #31289

Pressure Piping Code-Industrial Piping. Part 6: Safeguarding

Journal of Applied Fluid Transients, Vol 1-1, April 2014 (3-1)

Offshore platforms survivability to underwater explosions: part I

Thermal Profiling the Reflow Process

AUTOMATIC GAS MANIFOLDS

SX150A. Features. Typical Applications. Description

American Society of Sanitary Engineering PRODUCT (SEAL) LISTING PROGRAM

Accessories for Sanitary Installations

Xactix XeF2 OPERATION MANUAL

The Performance of Vertical Tunnel Thrusters on an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Operating Near the Free Surface in Waves

indd indd

PumpAgents.com - Click here for Pricing/Ordering Nominal psi (bar) Cut-In Cut-Out

GUIDELINES. Systems. Pressure

BUYER S GUIDE AQUAlogger 520

TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION

ATEX VACUUM PUMPS AND GAUGES CHEMICALLY RESISTANT, OIL-FREE AND SAFE

Impact Fatigue on Suction Valve Reed: New Experimental Approach

Actuator HON 670 / 671

Deploying the TCM-1 Tilt Current Meter in an Inverted (Hanging) Orientation By: Nick Lowell, Founder & President

Pneumatic High-Speed Pressure Controller Model CPC3000

SAFETY MANUAL FOR FLAMMABLE PRODUCT TRANSFER

Active Pulse Pressure Compensator APPC

Calibration System (CAL-04, CTC-04) Installation and Operation Instructions (Version 2.0)

Title: Pressure Relieving and Venting Devices Function: Ecology & Safety No.: BC Page: 1 of 7 Reviewed: 6/30/12 Effective: 7/1/12 (Rev.

Bubble Chamber Detector System

ZIN Technologies PHi Engineering Support. PHi-RPT CFD Analysis of Large Bubble Mixing. June 26, 2006

H 2 O Bubble Chamber Superheated Active Target System. Safety and Systems Overview B. DiGiovine

Flow transients in multiphase pipelines

The HumiPyc ( Model 2) - Gas Pycnometer; Density, Moisture, Permeation Analyzer; Filter Integrity Tester; RH sensor Calibrator

Some Aspects Regarding Testing Procedures for 9x19 mm Ammunition System while Evaluating Ballistic and Safety Characteristics During Life Cycle

Dräger PAS AirPack 2 Compressed Air Breathing Apparatus

CONTAINING SHOCK WAVES GENERATED IN EXPLOSIONS BY: CHIRAPHA ANANTAPHATHANAWONG

DELTI. Vac. DELTI-Vac MIL. Application. Principle. Characteristic

Burner Management System DEMO Operating instructions

Flex-Kleen CT Series Pulse-Jet Dust Collectors For high pressure/high vacuum applications

Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT)

AUTOMATIC HOSE TEST UNIT, TYPE SPU

Cash Valve TYPE KP PILOT OPERATED BACK PRESSURE VALVE. ISSUED - DECEMBER 2000 CAVMC-0518-US-0208 ISO 9001 Certified

Investigation of Quasi-detonation Propagation Using Simultaneous Soot Foil and Schlieren Photography

Pipeline Flooding, Dewatering and Venting Dr Aidan O'Donoghue, Pipeline Research Limited, Glasgow, Scotland

NEW TYPE M PRESSURE RELIEF DEVICE

Experimental determination of deflagration explosion characteristics of methane air mixture and their verification by advanced numerical simulation

I. Ostrovskyet al., 2008

Oxford Instruments Plasma Technology. PlasmaPro NGP80. Installation Data Sheet. Original Instructions.

MIL-STD-883G METHOD

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL No ME 5088

ANL Bubble Chamber Superheated Active Target System

Transcription:

Explosive Fittings Testing BFM Global Ltd. May 2012 EXCELLENCE IS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT

Contents 1. Summary... 3 2. Description of Samples... 4 3. Equipment... 4 4. Test Plan and Methodology... 5 4.1. Test Plan... 5 4.2. Experimental Method... 5 5. Results... 6 2

1. Summary Rocket Lab Limited (RLL) was contracted to conduct explosive testing of various flexible duct coupling products (fittings) supplied by BFM Global Limited (BFM). The purpose of the testing was to subject the fittings to desired test pressures resulting from an explosion. This was achieved by placing designed explosive charges within a vented pressure vessel which integrated the fitting specimens, subjecting them to a relatively short pressure pulse by igniting the charges. Five different fitting types were tested, made of various materials. Each fitting type was conditioned and tested at a target temperature range specified by BFM. All five tests performed on the BFM SEEFLEX 040E fittings were successful, with 60kPa exceeded for all tests. All six tests performed on the BFM SEEFLEX fittings with WM12K cover were successful with an average pressure in excess of 0kPa observed. The single test on the standard SEEFLEX specimen (with hose clamps) failed at an overpressure of 26.1kPa. Similarly, the single test on the standard Silicon specimen (with hose clamps) failed at an overpressure of 43.1kPa. 3

2. Description of Samples Five different types of fitting were supplied by BFM for testing, made from various materials. Five specimens were tested of each fitting type. The types comprised of: 1. SEEFLEX 040E Transparent polyester based thermoplastic polyurethane alloy (with a minimum material thickness of 0.9mm) 5 tests. 2. SEEFLEX with WM12K Cover Transparent polyester based thermoplastic polyurethane alloy with an exterior Kevlar cover 6 tests. 3. Standard SEEFLEX with Hose Clamps Transparent polyester based thermoplastic polyurethane alloy fitted with hose clamps 1 test. 4. Standard Silicon with Hose Clamps White, 5mm thick Silicon fitted with hose clamps 1 test. 3. Equipment The experimental setup consisted of: Steel pressure vessel integrating BFM and 3 rd party fittings, designed to contain explosive charge and pressure. Explosive charge, designed to produce minimum desired peak pressure Ballistic pressure sensor to measure pressure inside vessel Low-pass filter and amplifier to condition sensor signal Data acquisition system to record sensor data onto personal computer High frame rate (300fps) colour video cameras Pressure Vessel and Test Article A steel pressure vessel supplied by BFM, which integrated the fitting and contained the explosive charge. A pop-off relief valve was located on top of the vessel to automatically vent all pressure after ignition. Explosive Charge An explosive charge manufactured by RLL, designed and tested to produce a minimum desired peak pressure. The propellant is low-explosive black powder, initiated by an electric-match igniter. Pressure Sensor, Conditioning and Data Logging A PCB 113A26 piezoelectric ballistic pressure sensor was used to record the pressure. This type was selected due to its extremely short rise and response time. The sensor s output signal was conditioned using a PCB 483A02 Charge Amplifier and a Krohn-Hite Model 3321 Filter which further amplified increased the signal-to-noise ratio in the recorded signal. A National Instruments USB-6009 14-bit data acquisition system was used to log the signal at a frequency of 00Hz. All data from the DAQ system was directly recorded on a desktop computer. Imaging Devices A high-speed colour video camera was used to capture test footage at frames of 300 frames per second. 4

4. Test Plan and Methodology 4.1. TEST PLAN A total of 13 tests were conducted. These comprised of the following: 5 x SEEFLEX 040E 6 x SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover 1 x Standard SEEFLEX with Hose Clamps 1 x Standard Silicon with Hose Clamps BFM required the specimens to reach a peak temperature within a range during the explosive testing. The following table specifies the target temperatures for the different material types. Material Type Target Temperature ( C) SEEFLEX 040E 40 50 SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover 40 50 Standard SEEFLEX with Hose Clamps 30 Standard Silicon with Hose Clamps 40 50 4.2. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD Specimens were preconditioned in a temperature-controlled oven. To allow for cooling of the specimen between removal of the oven and ignition of the charge, conditioning temperatures were higher than the desired target temperature (typically 75-80 C). Specimen temperatures were recorded both prior to and after each explosive test. Prior to mounting the specimens, the explosive device was placed in the test pressure vessel at a specified distance from the specimen fixture. The fittings were then mounted in place and the temperature recorded before proceeding with the ignition procedure. Pressure data within the test vessel was recorded using a ballistic pressure transducer through a National Instruments DAQ system. A sampling rate of 00Hz was used for all tests. When the charge is ignited, the pressure climbs quickly and relatively linearly to a peak value before the pressure wave relieves through the valve. After the initial pressure wave, secondary pressure waves pass through the fitting. For the larger explosive charges (~0kPa overpressure), these secondary pressure waves can sometimes be greater than the initial pressure wave. These secondary pressure waves are due to internal reflections within the pressure vessel. The entire duration of positive pressure due to the explosive charge is in the order of 600 800 milliseconds. The intensity of the explosive charge and an integrated relief valve at the top of the test vessel predominantly affects the amplitude and duration of the pressure trace. BFM also required high-speed footage of some testing. Colour videos with a frame rate of 300fps were captured. 5

5. Results The following results were observed: All five SEEFLEX 040E specimens tested successfully withstood peak overpressures of at least 60 kpa. The material temperature range for these tests was 44-50 C. All specimens tested had a thickness tolerance of 0.9mm or greater. The SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover specimens successfully withstood six tests with an average peak overpressure of 4.2kPa. The maximum and minimum peak pressures observed were 129.3kPa and 90.4kPa respectively. The material temperature range for these tests was 42-49 C. The single standard SEEFLEX specimen (with hose clamps) failed with a peak overpressure of 26.1kPa. The material temperature for this test was approximately 30 C. The failure was caused by the material pulling through the hose clamps, enabling the rapid decompression of the hot gases. The single standard Silicon specimen (with hose clamps) failed with a peak overpressure of 43.1kPa. The material temperature for this test was approximately 52 C. The failure was caused by the failure of one of the hose clamps, enabling the rapid decompression. The sequence of images below was captured from high-speed footage of a test of SEEFLEX 040E specimens. The images clearly show the expansion of the fitting due to the pressure from the explosion, and the venting of pressure from the relief valve. (1) (2) 6

(5) (6) (7) (8) Figure 1: Sequence of images from high-speed footage of explosive test. Images numbered in chronological order The results for all specimens are summarised in the table below. The figures on the following pages show pressure data from each of the individual tests. Specimen Peak Pressure (kpa) Positive Pressure Duration (ms) Specimen Temperature ( C) Pre-test Post-test Peak Temp. ( C) Result SEEFLEX_040E_1 60.1 632 42 44 44 PASS SEEFLEX_040E_2 60.2 687 42 47 47 PASS SEEFLEX_040E_3 62.8 642 42 47 47 PASS SEEFLEX_040E_4 63.0 671 42 50 50 PASS SEEFLEX_040E_5 60.3 761 42 46 46 PASS SEEFLEX_040AS_WM12K_1 125.9 656 45 43 45 PASS SEEFLEX_040AS_WM12K_2 90.5 687 43 42 43 PASS SEEFLEX_040AS_WM12K_3 91.8 701 47 47 47 PASS SEEFLEX_040AS_WM12K_4 95.2 620 49 47 49 PASS SEEFLEX_040AS_WM12K_5 129.6 597 45 47 47 PASS SEEFLEX_040AS_WM12K_6 92.2 677 45 43 45 PASS STANDARD_SEEFLEX_1 26.1 36 28 30 30 FAIL STANDARD_SILICON_1 43.1 52 52 46 52 FAIL 7

SEEFLEX 040E #1-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 SEEFLEX 040E #2-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 SEEFLEX 040E #3-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 8

SEEFLEX 040E #4-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 SEEFLEX 040E #5-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 130 SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover #1 1 9 0-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 9

130 SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover #2 1 9 0-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 130 SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover #3 1 9 0-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 130 SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover #4 1 9 0-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

130 SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover #5 1 9 0-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 130 SEEFLEX 040AS with WM12K Cover #6 1 9 0-0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Standard SEEFLEX with Hose Clamps - 0 20 40 60 80 0 120 11

Standard LM4 with Hose Clamps - 0 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Standard Silicon with Hose Clamps - 0 20 40 60 80 0 120 12