Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Community Conservation Plan

Similar documents
Overview of Federal and State Wildlife Regulations

Presented by: Barbara A. Brenner Stoel Rives LLP. Bakersfield Association of Professional Landmen May 10, 2011

Endangered Species Act Application in New York State What s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver

Endangered Species on Ranches. Nebraska Grazing Conference August 14 15, 2012

endangered species act A Reference Guide August 2013 United States marine corps

AOGA EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR. Endangered Species Act

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Act of 1973

IC Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation

Environmental Law and Policy Salzman & Thompson

AOGA Educational Seminar

Protecting Biodiversity

Endangered Species Act and FERC Hydroelectric Projects. Jeff Murphy & Julie Crocker NHA New England Meeting November 16, 2010

Listed species under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries that occur in the geographic area of responsibility of the Wilmington District are:

Living Beaches: Integrating The Ecological Function Of Beaches Into Coastal Engineering Projects and Beach Management

Information To Assist In Compliance With Nationwide Permit General Condition 18, Endangered Species

Natural Resource Statutes and Policies

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

BALD EAGLE PROTECTION GUIDELINES FOR VIRGINIA. Prepared by

Natural Resource Statutes and Policies. Who Owns the Wildlife? Treaties. Federal Laws. State Laws. Policies. Administrative Laws.

Pre-Visit Lesson Endangered Species On the Brink of Recovery

Appendix C - Guidance for Integrating EFH Consultations with Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations

Bill Hanson US Fish & Wildlife Service

ESCA. Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Changed in 1973 to ESA Amended several times

A. PURPOSE B. BACKGROUND

Frequently Asked Questions About Revised Critical Habitat and Economic Analysis for the Endangered Arroyo Toad

[Docket No. FWS HQ MB ; FF09M FXMB123209EAGL0L2] Eagle Permits; Removal of Regulations Extending Maximum Permit Duration of

SUBMISSION GUIDE NATIVE PLANTS AND ANIMALS. May

107 FERC 61,282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

October 5, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

[FWS R6 ES 2017 N031; FF06E FXES111606C0000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Enhancement of Survival Permit

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PLAN FOR CANADA LYNX AND MINNESOTA S TRAPPING PROGRAM

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Southern White Rhino

Proposed Terrestrial Critical Habitat for the Northwest Atlantic Loggerhead Sea Turtle Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Claimed statutory authorities and roles in the Bison Management Plan for the State of Montana and Yellowstone National Park

Re: Unauthorized incidental take of Florida panther due to Lee County excavation activities and associated increases in traffic volume

United States Department of the Interior

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Exotic Wildlife Association Membership Alert

May 11, It is unclear to PEER whether Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge management is aware of or condones the actions described below.

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

U.S. Atlantic Federal Shark Management. Karyl Brewster-Geisz Highly Migratory Species Management Division NMFS/NOAA May 2012

United States Department of the Interior

Endangered Species Emergency Consultation

APPENDIX Region 6 Inland Area Contingency Plan Compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act

US Dept. of Commerce NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Law Enforcement

[Docket No. FWS-HQ-ES ; FF09E FXES111609C0000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Candidate

Blending Research, Management, Outreach, and Policy to Recover a Federally Listed Species. Megan M. Seymour

United States Department of the Interior

Draft Range-Wide General Conservation Plan for Utah Prairie Dogs (Docket No. FWS-R6-ES )

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

United States Department of the Interior

2000 AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE FREE-RESPONSE QUESTIONS

CENTER for BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY VIA FACSIMILE AND CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Robert Williams, Field Supervisor

Endangered Species Act 1975 [8 MIRC Ch.3]

Legislation. Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2013

Permitting under the Endangered Species Act, 2007

United States Department of the Interior

Management of Shellfish Aquaculture and Propagation in Massachusetts Waters

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation - Biological Opinion

United States Department of the Interior

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 52-7 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 7. Exhibit 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

Management of Canada Geese

Developments Under the Endangered Species Act: What Organizations Need to Know. April 26, 2016

United States Department of the Interior

Agenda Item 7.1 For Information. Council CNL(10)24. Annual Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans USA

Laws of the People's Republic of China Governing Foreign-Related Matters Volume II

CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS. Section 1. Title. This Act shall be known as the Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act.

IC Chapter 6. Regulation of Birds and Mammals

Big Cypress National Preserve. Hunting Management Plan /

Past, Present and Future Activities Being Conducted in the Klamath River Basin Related to the Protection and Recovery of Fish and Their Habitat

II. Comments Regarding the Mitigation Goals of Net Conservation Benefit and No Net Loss

Other Relevant International Standards OIE Global Conference on Rabies Control 7-9 September 2011, Incheon, Korea

Essential Fish Habitat Consultation

Bexar County Environmental Services 233 North Pecos La Trinidad, Suite 420, San Antonio, Texas (210) Office (210) Fax

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

Section 3: The Future of Biodiversity

Wildlife Issues With Oil and Gas Exploration. Peter D. McKone, CWB Senior Project Director

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Amendment to

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

3608, H.R. 6344, H.R. 6345, H.R. 6346, H.R. 6354, H.R. 6355, H.R. 6356, H.R.

SENATE BILL No Agenda Item H.1 Supplemental Attachment 3 April 2018 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 21, Introduced by Senator Allen

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the Draft Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) Conservation Strategy

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; ; ABC Code: C6] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reinstatement of the Regulation that

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

CENTER for BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION AND CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tulsa, Oklahoma. Jonna Polk, Field Supervisor

FISHERIES, WILDLIFE, MIGRATORY BIRDS AND RENEWABLE RESOURCES ACT

San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex, CO; Availability of Record of

Spring-run Chinook Salmon Reintroduction Experimental Population Designation Elif Fehm-Sullivan National Marine Fisheries Service

inc SIMON JACKSON Nature conservation Fact sheet 14

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on Petitions to Delist

Re: Revisions to Regulations for Eagle Incidental Take and Take of Eagle Nests

OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DIVISION 046

Case 1:11-cv GZS Document 1 Filed 01/31/11 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE. Defendants.

Transcription:

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Community Conservation Plan Overview Workshop January 21, 2006 David Zippin, Ph.D. Project Manager Paola Bernazzani, M.S. Deputy Project Manager Section 1. Overview of Federal and State Laws Relevant to Plan 1-1

Federal Endangered Species Act Purpose and policies Purpose: Conserve ecosystems and species that depend on those ecosystems Policies: Federal agencies should use existing authorities to conserve species and cooperate with state programs Responsibilities for administration Secretary of Commerce: NOAA Fisheries (marine and anadromous species) Secretary of the Interior: USFWS (most species) Section 4: Listings Key Terms Species: species, subspecies, includes distinct population segments Endangered Species: in danger of extinction through all or significant portion of its range Threatened Species: likely to become endangered Proposed Species: proposed for listing in Federal Register 1-2

Section 4: Listings Key Terms (Cont.) Candidate Species: under consideration for proposing to list Conservation: methods to allow species recovery Critical Habitat: formally designated specific geographic areas essential to conservation of species 4(d) Rule: if appropriate, specifies protection for species listed as threatened Section 9: Prohibited Acts Prohibition: all persons are prohibited from importing, exporting, taking, transporting, or selling fish and wildlife species listed as endangered under federal ESA Persons: prohibition applies to all private or public entities or individuals subject to U.S. government jurisdiction Take: action of or attempt to hunt, harm, harass, pursue, shoot, wound, capture, kill, trap, or collect a species 1-3

Section 9: Prohibited Acts (Cont.) Harm: any act that kills or injures species, including significant habitat modification or degradation Harass: any act or omission, intentional or negligent, that creates the likelihood of injury to a species by annoying it to such an extent to significantly disrupt normal behavior patterns Section 9: Prohibited Acts (Cont.) Listed Plants: Take prohibition applies to fish and wildlife species only; Section 9 prohibits unlawful removal and reduction to possession, or malicious damage or destruction of any endangered plant under federal control; Section 9 prohibits acts to remove, cut, dig up, or damage or destroy an endangered plant in nonfederal areas in knowing violation of any state law or in the course of criminal trespass ES-7c 1-4

Section 9: Prohibited Acts (Cont.) Threatened Species: under Section 4(d) of the federal ESA, the protections under Section 9 are discretionary; however, if no special rule regarding take is defined, Section 9 prohibitions apply (USFWS, not NOAA Fisheries) Proposed Species, Petitioned Species, Candidate Species: receive no protection under Section 9 ES-7c Exceptions to Section 9 Federal Agency Involvement (Section 7), No- Jeopardy Biological Opinion: as part of the federal agency s formal consultation requirement under Section 7, statement authorizing the incidental take of a listed species No Federal Agency Involvement (Section 10), Section 10 Permits: Scientific, Enhancement of Survival, and Incidental Take Permits 1-5

Section 10: Permits Section 10(a)(1)(A) Authorized Take Permits: issued by USFWS/NOAA Fisheries for Scientific research and recovery permits - associated with activities such as captive breeding, trapping/banding; Interstate commerce permits - associated with transport and captive breeding activities Enhancement of survival permits (ESP) - associated with Safe Harbor Agreements and Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances (CCAA) Section 10(a)(1)(B) Incidental Take Permits (ITP): issued by USFWS/NOAA Fisheries for take resulting from otherwise lawful activities What Is a Habitat Conservation Plan? Legal basis for HCPs under Section 10(a)(2)(A): No permit may be issued by the Secretary authorizing any taking referred to in paragraph (1)(B) unless the applicant therefore submits to the Secretary a conservation plan. Habitat Conservation Plan required for issuance of a Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit 1-6

Section 10 HCP Process: Primary Sources of Authority Federal Endangered Species Act Section 10 (16 U.S.C. 1539) USFWS Section 10 Regulations (50 CFR 17) NOAA Fisheries ESA Regulations (50 CFR 222) Handbook for Habitat Conservation Planning and Incidental Take Permitting Process, November 1996 ( HCP Handbook ) Final Addendum to the HCP Handbook ( Five-Point Policy ) (65 Fed. Reg. 106, 35242 35257, June 1, 2000) Section 7: Consultation Requirement: All federal agencies must, in consultation with USFWS/NOAA Fisheries, ensure that its actions do not jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species, or destroy or adversely modify the listed species critical habitat Federal Action: discretionary actions authorized, funded, or carried out by federal agency Effects of the Action: environmental baseline and indirect effects ( may effect determination) Process: informal consultation (federal agency request species list, prepare biological assessment) and formal consultation (Service prepares biological opinion) Jeopardy: reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild 1-7

Internal Section 7 Consultation on Section 10 Permit Consultation within USFWS or NOAA Fisheries separate Section 7 staff and Section 10 staff Additional Section 7 considerations Indirect and cumulative effects Listed plants (jeopardy determination) Effects on listed critical habitat Jeopardy v. no jeopardy USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries Section 10 Findings Take is incidental to otherwise lawful activity Applicant will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize and mitigate the impacts of taking Long-term funding for mitigation is ensured Taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the species in the wild 1-8

NEPA Compliance for HCPs Lead agency USFWS or NOAA Fisheries EIS (regional or large project HCP), EA (small project HCP), or categorical exclusion ( low-effect HCP) Proposed Action issuance of Incidental Take Permit Analysis of the impacts on the human environment of implementing the HCP Scoping, public involvement, responding to comments Concludes with Record of Decision (ROD) for EIS California Endangered Species Act California Fish & Game Code Sections 2070 2075 Listing process Section 2080 Prohibition against take Section 2081 Allowance for incidental take 1-9

California Endangered Species Act Listing Process: Key Terms Endangered: native bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant in serious danger of becoming extinct overall or a significant portion of its range Threatened: native bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant not presently endangered but likely to become endangered if not given special protection Excludes invertebrates and non-native species from listing Candidate Species: under review for listing Prohibited Acts Endangered and Threatened Species (Section 2080): prohibition against commerce and taking Candidate Species (Section 2084): discretionary protection (Fish and Game Commission) Take (Section 86): hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill Harm and Harassment constitute take if they are the proximate cause of death (DFG General Council) 1-10

Take Authorization Section 2080.1: authorized take for joint federal/state-listed species with federal Section 7 or 10 authorization Section 2081(a): take for scientific, educational, or management purposes Section 2081(b): take incidental to otherwise lawful activities Section 2086: take incidental to agricultural activities under approved voluntary local program Section 2835: take authorized under regional NCCP Natural Community Conservation Planning Act of 2002 SB107 passed legislature in 2001 Signed by the Governor February 2, 2002 Went into effect January 1, 2003 Repealed and replaced existing 1991 NCCPA Greatly enhanced NCCPs now HCP plus 1-11

Natural Community Conservation Planning Act Need for broad-based planning to provide effective protection of wildlife resources and allow appropriate development and growth Reduce conflicts Voluntary program (alternative to Sect. 2081 permit) Promotes coordination and cooperation Southern California Coastal Sage Scrub NCCP Region 1-12

NCCPA Components Planning Agreement Public involvement process Independent scientific review Natural Community Conservation Plan Implementation Agreement DFG NCCP determination CEQA compliance Public Review Process (Sec. 2815) DFG and participants shall establish a public participation process throughout plan development Draft documents made available to public for at least 60 days prior to adoption Documents made available 10 working days prior to public hearings Make available to public all draft plans, MOUs, maps, species lists, guidelines 1-13

Public Review Process (Cont.) May be concurrent with CEQA public review process and must integrate with hearings otherwise required by law Shall include an outreach program to provide access to information to all persons interested in the plan 1-14

DFG Findings to Approve NCCP (Sec. 2820a) Consistent with Planning Agreement Protects habitat, natural communities, and species diversity on a landscape level (through creation of habitat reserves or measures that provide equivalent conservation of covered species ) DFG Findings to Approve NCCP (Cont.) Reserve system and conservation measures must: Conserve ecological integrity of large habitat blocks, ecosystem functions, and biodiversity Provide conservation of covered species in plan area; linkages among reserves and with outside areas - conservation = recovery or preventing listing Support sustainable populations of covered species Provide range of environmental gradients and habitat diversity to support shifting species distributions Sustain movement of species among reserves 1-15

DFG Findings to Approve NCCP (Cont.) Identify activities allowed within reserves Specific conservation measures for covered species Includes monitoring program Includes adaptive management program Plan implementation schedule and landowner and participant obligations if schedule not met Provisions to ensure adequate funding Specific rationale for covered species (Sec. 2821a) Implementing Agreement (Sec. 2820b) Define species coverage and conditions Provisions for establishing reserves or other conservation measures Specific terms and conditions that, if violated, would result in permit revocation. Must include: failure to provide funding failure to mitigate (roughly proportional to impacts) changes in plan or projects without prior wildlife agency approval level of take exceeds permit 1-16

Implementing Agreement (Cont.) Plan amendment procedures Provisions to ensure monitoring and adaptive management are implemented Provisions for oversight of plan implementation Provisions for periodic reporting to wildlife agencies and the public Mechanisms to ensure adequate funding Implementing Agreement (Cont.) Provisions to ensure mitigation is roughly proportional in timing and extent to impacts on habitat and covered species 1-17

Assurances Provided For unforeseen circumstances: additional land, water, or financial compensation or additional restrictions on use of land, water, or other natural resources shall not be required without the consent of plan participants (Sec2820[f][2]) Caveats on level of assurances tied to level of knowledge/data and plan size/duration Other California Fish and Game Code Protection Species protected under California Fish and Game Codes for which DFG may not authorize take, except for scientific research Section 3511 Fully protected birds Section 4700 Fully protected mammals Section 5050 Fully protected reptiles and amphibians Section 5515 Fully protected fish no provision of this code or any other law shall be construed to authorize the issuance of permits or licenses to take any fully protected [bird], [mammal], [reptile or amphibian], [fish]... ES-49 1-18

Fully Protected Species in Santa Clara County American peregrine falcon** Brown pelican California black rail California clapper rail California least tern Golden eagle** Southern bald eagle** White-tailed kite** Ring-tailed cat** Salt marsh harvest mouse San Francisco garter snake **Species being considered for HCP/NCCP ES-50 1-19

Other Relevant Federal Laws Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act Migratory Bird Treaty Act Clean Water Act Sections 401 and 404 (wetlands and water quality permitting) National Historic Preservation Act (addressed in EIS) Section 2. The Santa Clara Valley HCP/NCCP Context and Process 1-20