Black Bear Response Guide

Similar documents
Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes. Guidelines and Information

Grizzly Bear Conservation in Alberta: 2010 Management Activities and Recovery Implementation

City of Isle of Palms, SC Coyote Management Plan

Town of Mount Pleasant Coyote Management Plan

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT CAPTURES, RELOCATIONS, AND REMOVALS IN NORTHWEST WYOMING

COYOTE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Purpose

Town of New Castle. DRAFT Coyote Response Plan

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASTLE PINES NORTH APPROVING A COYOTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Jeffrey Cole, Wildlife Manager Fish and Wildlife Dispatch

Hazing Guidelines Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW), Area 5 For distribution to local government agencies

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

THE BLACKFOOT WATERSHED WOLF AND BEAR ACTIVITY REPORT 10/27/2014

WildSafeBC Elk Valley and South Country Annual Report Including: Elkford, Sparwood and the surrounding rural Elk Valley and South Country

Province of Alberta Rat Control Plan

Living With Alligators. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

Polar Bear Interaction Plan

MODULE 2. Conservation needs of cheetah and wild dogs and related threats to their survival. Notes:

NCDE Spring Meeting Notes

HABITUATED BEARS IN ROMANIA A CHALLENGE FOR ROMANIAN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT

Critical Incident Review Report

United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Yellowstone National Park April 1977 Rev: April 1979

Subject: Human/Wildlife Interactions in California: Mountain Lion Depredation, Public Safety, and Animal Welfare

Title 12: CONSERVATION

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PENTICTON COUNCIL REPORT. DATE: 9 th January 2012 RES:

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

Living With Your Wild(er) Neighbors. Kristin Cannon, District Wildlife Manager-Boulder North

PLEASE DON T FEED THE WILDLIFE

Township of Muskoka Lakes Bear Hazard Assessment January 2006

LANCU46v2 - SQA Unit Code H2PW 04 Control vertebrate pests and predators using traps

Beausoleil First Nation Eleven O-Gemaa Miikaan Christian Island, ON L9M 0A Fax:

Mayor Cooper, Deputy Mayor Saunderson and Councillors. Coyote Management Threat Assessment / Options

Management of Canada Geese

Alberta Conservation Association 2016/17 Project Summary Report. Primary ACA staff on project: Stefanie Fenson, Jeff Forsyth and Jon Van Dijk

Proposals to Modernize Canada s Migratory Birds Regulations to Improve Management of Hunting Bait Restrictions

Hundreds of encounters turn out okay because people react appropriately says DeBolt. Decades of education and bear advocacy by the WYGFD have saved

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

Cambodian Mekong Dolphin Conservation Project. Phay Somany Fisheries Administration Of Cambodia

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

2015 Bear and Cougar Activity in Mountain View County

BROWN BEAR MANAGEMENT IN SLOVENIA. Marko JONOZOVIČ, B.Sc. Slovenia Forest Service Head of Wildlife & Hunting Department

Government Facts.

WildSafeBC Annual Report 2015 Columbia Valley

FACT SHEET Ministry of Natural Resources

DEC :52 FR INflC:SOUTH SK TO Ochapowace Law

Fisheries, Wildlife, Migratory Birds and Renewable Resources Act

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

MILWAUKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT

2. Time Critical: Yes hunting proponents have requesting the matter be brought before Council.

Guidelines for fishing for sharks posing an imminent threat to public safety

WildSafeBC Annual Report 2016

How people should respond when encountering a large carnivore: opinions of wildlife professionals

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

New Road Safety Strategy Aims to Ensure Canada Has World s Safest Roads

2016 Bear and Cougar Activity in Mountain View County

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE POLICY Human Resources Division

Fact sheet. Badgers A Guide for Developers. January Page 1 of 8

WildSafeBC Year End Report 2015 Kaslo and Area

Coyotes: Wild and free on the urban interface. Dana Sanchez Extension Wildlife Specialist

March , 7:00 p.m. 8:30 p.m. Central Arena 519 Drury Lane Burlington, Ontario 9/14/2015

PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY ISSUES

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

Livestock Concerns with Feral Hogs. Aaron Sumrall Newton Co. Extension Agent

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

Challenges of Florida Panther Conservation. Presented by: Darrell Land, Florida Panther Team Leader

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

City of Fountain Valley COYOTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Coyotes (Canis latrans) in Florida: the Good, the Bad, & the Ugly

Automated Traffic Enforcement Technology Guidelines

Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of

Surfing Australia Shark Risk Management Policy

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

Know and Save the Bear

Predators & Policies. Overview

!! Conduct Management! Change for the better.

RULES AND REGULATIONS

Water Quality Guidelines for Total Gas Pressure: First Update

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Fauna Management Procedure Environment

NJDEP Division of Fish and Wildlife

5 AUTOMATED SPEED ENFORCEMENT PROPOSAL

Coyotes (Canis latrans) in Florida

SPURRING POSITIVITY PROGRAM (11 Pages)

CODE OF DISCIPLINE and MINIMUM SUSPENSIONS (Revised August 2016)

TRACEABILITY CATTLE IDENTIFICATION REGULATION

VILLAGE OF STIRLING IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA Bylaw No Animal Control Bylaw

The first of its kind in Québec!

SOME COUGAR ADVICE (Source: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife)

Dear Valued Partner: If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact your Canada Goose sales representative directly.

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

Species at Risk Act (SARA) Consultation Workbook

WILDLIFE HERITAGE TRUST ACCOUNT PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

8.0 Fish and Wildlife Management

Tuesday 7 June 2016 Morning

Coexisting in Coyote Country

DRAFT G-1 DRAFT. United States Lifesaving Association Shark Bite Prevention and Response Guidelines January 6, p.1 of 4

Transcription:

Title: Black Bear Response Guide Number: Program Name: Fish and Wildlife Policy Effective Date: April 1, 2016 This document was updated on: ISBN No. Disclaimer: April 1, 2016 ISBN 978-1-4601-2715-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-4601-2716-2 (PDF) Copyright in this publication, regardless of format, belongs to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Alberta. Reproduction of this publication, in whole or in part, regardless of purpose, requires the prior written permission of Alberta Environment & Parks. Black Bear Response Guide INTRODUCTION An effective wildlife management strategy must balance the needs of wildlife with those of the public. Protection of life and property is a priority, along with considering what is best for the black bear population. This guide provides a standard approach in deciding black bear management responses. It is a resource for government staff who must act in situations of conflict where clear, concise and consistent direction is needed. The guide supports the province s Black Bear Management Plan (2016) and is the result of collaboration among biologists, enforcement officers, and problem wildlife specialists. Except in national parks, this guide will apply to specific events involving black bears throughout the province, including lands within provincial parks and protected areas. The guide is reviewed annually and revised as required. The guide also shows Albertans how human/black bear incidents will be handled. Staff will use the guide as a reference to communicate with stakeholders and the public about managing human-black bear conflicts and to promote public and community support for black bear conservation. 01/04/2016 Black Bear Response Guide Page 1 of 5

PREVENTATIVE ACTION Preventative action is the first response in most situations where a black bear has not presented an immediate threat to humans. Preventative actions include: Assess situation/monitor; Close area to public access; Educate by providing information on wildlife behaviour and presence; Remove or order removal of attractants; Allow access by groups only; Erect electric fences around camps and/or attractants; Limit access through timing restrictions; Allow hard-sided accommodation only (no tents or tent trailers); Use hazing or aversive conditioning on site by trained personnel; and Hard release involves release soon after capture and usually at the capture site, with harassment. Often, preventative actions may be sufficient to prevent future incidents. For example, if a black bear is utilizing areas of natural foods in close proximity to humans, then closing the area to public access until the bear leaves the area, or by removing the attractant, will effectively prevent potentially dangerous encounters. Preventative actions are often the appropriate first response. USING THE GUIDE If preventative actions have proven insufficient and control actions are deemed necessary, this guide will be used to determine the appropriate response. The guide relies on the results of an incident investigation along with assessing the black bear age/sex classification, behaviour, and known conflict history, to enable staff to determine an appropriate response option for a human/black bear conflict incident. Black bears have known behavioural patterns that, when combined with location, time and other factors, may indicate an incident is probable. It is unlikely however that the guide anticipates all possible situations. Where situations do not fall cleanly within the guide, staff will make decisions that most closely follow the guide. INVESTIGATION Reports of human/black bear conflict or property damage will be investigated by trained government staff. The aim of the investigation is to collect evidence, including witness reports and physical evidence that will provide an accurate account of the bear s actions, as well as any human activity involved. CLASSIFICATION Four main factors are used to help determine an appropriate response to human/bear conflict or property damage. They include the age, sex, and family status of the animal (sow with cub, 01/04/2016 Black Bear Response Guide Page 2 of 5

orphan, etc.), the animal s behaviour, location of the incident, and its known conflict history. For example, a black bear that has been involved in conflict in the past will be classified differently than one that has no history. An experienced Fish and Wildlife Officer or, in Provincial Parks, a Conservation Officer or Ecologist, will make these determinations based on evidence collected during an investigation, and may call upon other technical experts to assist with the evaluation. The subsequent response will be based on these factors as outlined in the guide. The following age-based descriptions are used to classify the type of black bear involved in an incident: Cub: < 12 months Orphan Cub: < 12 months not accompanied by adult Young: A cub or yearling that is accompanying the mother Adult: > 12 months A bear is further classified based on its behaviour: Habituated: A habituated black bear shows little or no perceived reaction to people. This is an animal whose presence could be interpreted as, or lead to a public safety risk. A habituated bear may frequent developed areas or areas of high human use, or may feed on natural foods within or adjacent to developed sites or in areas frequented by people such as roadsides, campgrounds, or ranch yards. Preventative actions should be used on a black bear classified as habituated. Food-conditioned: A black bear that has learned to associate people (or the smell of people), human activities, human-use areas, or food storage receptacles, including for agriculture, with anthropogenic food. The black bear regularly uses unnatural food materials (such as garbage, pet food, compost, bird feed, or livestock food) that have been reasonably secured from black bears. It repeatedly feeds on agricultural crops or other anthropogenic food sources in close proximity to humans and is considered an imminent public safety risk. Depredation: A depredation black bear has attacked, killed, or is an immediate threat to a pet or livestock animal. Offender: An offender black bear is one that presents an apparent threat to human safety or has had contact with, injured or killed a human after being provoked (i.e. the black bear s actions were the result of, or response to, actions by the human). An offender bear will not always require capture, for example if the bear s response was defensive in nature and the contact was not prolonged. Predator: A predator black bear is one that has killed a human and either fed upon or concealed the body, or has stalked, pursued, chased or ambushed a human (unprovoked) resulting in black bear-human contact, whether or not the victim was killed or injured. If the black bear s young participated in the attack or fed upon the victim, then all members of the family group will be classified as Predator. 01/04/2016 Black Bear Response Guide Page 3 of 5

An animal s history is also used to determine an appropriate response, taking into account the number of times the behaviour of a particular black bear has been rated against this guide. This history will be informed by strong evidence that the conflict history is associated with the individual in question. For example, DNA and marked bears provide the strongest level of evidence towards the history. Depending on the severity of an offence, multiple occurrences related to the same bear in a short period of time, during which no capture occurs, will be interpreted as a single offence. In some instances, a black bear will be captured, radio marked, and monitored as part of a research or an aversive conditioning program. Such a capture event will not be counted as part of the bear s conflict history. RESPONSE If a bear needs to be captured by culvert trap, snare, or immobilization it will be done in accordance with the established departmental standards and procedures. The following chart identifies the types of responses based on the age, behaviour and history of the bear. When euthanasia is determined to be the appropriate response, the action will follow the Canada Council on Animal Care Guidelines. 01/04/2016 Black Bear Response Guide Page 4 of 5

BLACK BEAR RESPONSE CHART PREVENTATIVE ACTION WILL BE THE INITIAL RESPONSE BEFORE THE DECISION IS MADE TO CAPTURE (see above) THE RESPONSE CHART RELATES TO BEARS CAPTURED AS THE RESULT OF A CONFLICT INCIDENT BEHAVIOUR RANK HABITUATED / FOOD CONDITIONED DEPREDATION OFFENDER/ PREDATOR HISTORY RANK 1 2 1 2 1 BEAR TYPE Adult RL / EU EU RL / EU EU EU Cub/Orphan Cub EU EU EU RESPONSE TYPE RL- Relocation within Bear Management Area EU- Euthanasia Original signed by: Travis Ripley Executive Director Fish and Wildlife Policy Branch Environment and Parks Date: 01/04/2016 Black Bear Response Guide 2016 Government of Alberta Page 5 of 5