Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Similar documents
Appendix F: Wayfinding Protocol and Best Practices

Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc. june 2011

Appendix D. City of Fort Collins Bicycle Wayfinding System Guidance. Appendix D: Bicycle Wayfinding System Guidance Final Draft 11/20/2014 1

Task 4 Wayfinding Elements, Placement and Technical Guidance 4.1 Wayfinding Elements

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

NCHRP Task 350. U.S. Bicycle Route Signing

OBJECTIVE: Improve safety by designing all bicycle facilities to the latest AASHTO bicycle guidelines and 2009 MUTCD Standards.

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

(This page left intentionally blank)

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

Who is Toole Design Group?

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

DUPAGE COUNTY ON-ROAD BICYCLE CONNECTION GUIDELINES

Off-road Trails. Guidance

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

MINNEAPOLIS PARK & RECREATION BOARD DRAFT TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR: SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR STREET BANNER APPLICATION PACKAGE

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 8 Maintenance of Pedestrian Facilities and Alternate Pedestrian Access Routes in Work Zones

City of Dallas Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Control and Safety Treatments at Trail-Road Crossings

ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE (1) For

Hidden Oaks Elementary School

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

Driveway Design Criteria

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SIGN AND MARKING PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

Designing On Road Bikeways

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

PART 7. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR SCHOOL AREAS CHAPTER 7A. GENERAL

Bike Planning: A New Day

Best Practices for the Design and Operation of Reduced Conflict Intersections

Bicycle Facilities Planning

Construction Specifications Manual

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Bases, Ballasts, and Paving

Coquitlam Cross-town Bike Route Improving Bicycle Facilities in a Mature Suburban Environment

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

Dakota County Transportation Department Roadway Guidance Signing

Arlington County, Virginia ~ National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Transportation and Land-Use Connections (TLC) Program

APPENDIX G SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SUPPLEMENT

Duwamish Way-finding and CTR Report

UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

CHAPTER 7 BICYCLING, WALKING, & TRAILS: DESIGN GUIDELINES

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

Traffic Control Devices

PEDESTRIAN FENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 30

Tract or Parcel Project Name PCN Checked By Date

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

APPENDIX 4 PEDESTRIAN FACILITY DESIGN INFORMATION

C C C

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

An Overview of the 2009 MUTCD

LANCASTER CITY BICYCLE NETWORK

Roadways. Roadways III.

Appendix A-6. Signing and Marking Guidelines. Number Name Pages. 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1. 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

Emergency Response Support Signage on Multi-Use Trails Plan

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

CONSTRUCTION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION AND PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS

Town of Windsor Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

REVISION 2 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. Ginger Quinn & Paul Kelley April 11, 2018

Railroad Inspection Procedure Manual

INTERSECTION DESIGN TREATMENTS

A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown

In response to your request for information on mid-block pedestrian crossing policies and guidelines, the following information is enclosed:

TRAFFIC LINE MANUAL Edition Revision 1 June 2012 TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION

Transcription:

Appendix C Bicycle Route Signage

This page intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX C - BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE Bicycle route signs are wayfinding signs that guide bicyclists along preferred, designated routes to destinations throughout the region. The following guidelines are a supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD; 2009 edition) and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO, 1991 edition 1 ) Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. They are not design standards and should not be used as such. When designing and installing bicycle route signage; engineering judgment should always be used to apply the guidance provided in this appendix. All signs in the recommended bicycle route signage system are currently found in the MUTCD s guidelines for directional bicycle signage. The bicycle route signage system was modeled after the City of Seattle and City of Chicago systems. This document also covers the following topics: Family of Bicycle Signs, Destination Hierarchy, Sign Placement Graphics, and new guidance on trail signing from the 2009 MUTCD. Bicycle route signs should provide bicyclists with direction, destination, and distance information to commercial centers, rail stations, shared use paths, and other popular destinations. The signage system should provide three general forms of guidance: 1. Directional and Spot Directional Signs placed at decision points where routes intersect or where guidance is needed 2. Regional Route Signs placed along designated routes 3. Confirmation Signs (also called Designation Signs) used to confirm route choice All signs can be used on-street or on shared-use paths. The intent is to create a single, integrated signing system. Design Guidelines for Sign Types: Directional and Spot Directional Signs Directional signs and spot directional signs are placed at decision points where routes intersect or guidance is needed. 1 1999 Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities is being revised. Plan should be updated to guidance found in the new guide 1

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION FIGURE C-1 Directional Signs (D1-1c) Directional signs include direction, destination, and distance information, and are placed 30 to 100 feet before routes intersect. Installation of directional signs should be based on the following guidelines: The maximum number of characters allowed per directional sign (mileage numbers not counted) is 18. Directional blades, or signs such as that shown in Figure C-1, should be placed at decision points where signed routes intersect and where routes lead directly to the intended destination. Placing signs at these locations reinforces the use of designated routes. No more than three destinations should be provided on a given post so that the proper vertical clearance between directional blades is maintained. No more than two signs should point in the same direction on a given post. Limiting destinations to two in one direction is necessary to provide space for destinations in other directions as this sign type will occur at intersecting routes. The sign with the nearest destination should go at the top of the assembly, with the farthest destination at the bottom. If destinations are equal in distance, the sign with an up arrow should be placed on top. This arrangement allows for the nearest destination to be removed the top of the sign and subsequent destinations to move up as bicyclists approach. When directional blades are placed on or direct riders to regional routes (routes that continue outside the City of St. Louis), regional route signs (M1-8a and auxiliary blades) may be placed on the same sign post below the blades. Placing multiple sign types on one post will reduce the number of posts and provide all the necessary information for bicyclists in one location. Destinations are ranked: Primary: shared-use trails, commercial centers, downtown area, regional parks, bridges Secondary: Institutions, major universities and community colleges, Metro transit stations, other municipalities Tertiary: Other public institutions such as sport stadiums, airports etc. (to be determined on case-by-case basis) Along bicycle routes, distances are indicated to the geographical centers of downtown and 2

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE commercial areas, and to the access points to other destinations such as shared-use trails, regional parks, and transit stations. Directional Spot Signs (D1-1b - MUTCD Reference) Directional Spot Signs are similar to directional signs but provide direction and destination information only (not distance). They are used when a destination is off the signed route or when getting to the route requires additional wayfinding. They should not be installed on the same posts as directional signs. Spot signs may include the words To and Via where necessary, and may vary in width to accommodate limited space in the right-of-way. Spot signs do not need to be followed by a confirmation sign. Spot signs may be used where: Guidance is needed to reach signed bicycle routes from adjacent roadways, side paths, etc., or access to important facilities such as bridges. Guidance from signed bicycle routes is needed when important destinations are a short distance off the signed route. In such cases, a directional sign may indicate the best access point from the signed route to the destination. Additional spot signs can be used to guide bicyclists to that destination. Regional Route Signs Place along designated routes. FIGURE C-2 Regional Route Signs (M1-8a) Regional route signs will be placed along named or numbered regional on-street routes and trails to assist bicyclists in wayfinding along the route or to confirm that they are on the desired route. The signs also include auxiliary signs such as directional arrows (M7 series) and words like To, End, and Begin. On shred use path routes, the regional route signs will be used: 30 to 50 feet after every intersection or street crossing or every ¼ mile where there is a gap in 3

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION signage At transitional locations (such as path -to-road transitions) or in cases where bicyclists will be transitioning to sidewalks. At trail entrances and exits, Begin and End auxiliary signs should be used above the regional route sign. On street routes, the regional route signs will be placed: 30 to 100 feet before a turn (with an auxiliary arrow). 30 to 60 feet after the turn to confirm the path. At decision points, where needed. Within proximity (a few blocks) to regional routes, similar to a spot sign. Sign can be used in conjunction with an auxiliary sign such as an arrow or the word To. When distance is farther than a few blocks, directional signs are used to direct riders to regional routes. Organization of signs on posts: Regional route signs can be mounted on the same post, below regulatory, warning or destination signs. Regional route signs may be placed back-to-back or back-to-back with regulatory or warning signs. When multiple regional route signs are placed on the same post, they can be stacked depending on height and visibility. The current route should be the top sign. See Appendix C for system layout examples. Confirmation Signs (D11-1c) Confirmation signs are used to confirm route choice, and will include destination information generally with the text "to" the location indicated on the directional blade. In cases where a confirmation sign is found on a regional route and the route must be confirmed after a turn has been made, a regional route sign may be place below the confirmation sign. FIGURE C-3 Installation of Confirmation Signs should be based on the following Guidelines: a. Maximum characters per confirmation sign: 22. b. Confirmations signs should be placed: 4

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE 30-60 after decision points (preferably within sight of Directional Sign) 30-60 after major intersections, or After every ¼ mile of unsigned segment along designated on-street routes. Additional Guidance on Sign Posts a. If possible, place sign on an existing post to minimize visual clutter and reduce costs. b. Wooden Utility Poles: Bicycle wayfinding signs cannot be placed on wooden utility poles. Sign posts must be at least 5 from wooden utility poles to allow for climbing of wooden utility pole. c. Metal Utility Poles: Bicycle wayfinding signs can be placed on metal utility poles, light poles and strain poles. Recommended Use/Installation Parameters/Criteria The following table and illustration provide guidelines for sign post height based on AASHTO minimum clearances 5

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION FIGURE C-4 1999 AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities 6

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE FIGURE C-5 7

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION FAMILY OF BICYCLE SIGNS - SIGNS AND SIGN SPECIFICATIONS The following signs are to be used in conjunction with the Bicycle Route signage and Way-finding Protocol. FIGURE C-6 TO C-9 8

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE FIGURE C-10 9

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION FIGURE C-11 10

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE Figure C-12 11

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION FIGURE C-13 12

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE FIGURE C-14 13

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION DESTINATION HIERARCHY FIGURE C-15 14

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE 15

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION C.6: "BICYCLE DOT" GUIDANCE Bicycle Dots are pavement markings intended to supplement, complement or be used in lieu of bicycle route signs. Unlike shared lane markings, Bicycle Dots are not intended to provide guidance on bicycle positioning within the roadway, Bicycle Dots are they intended to affect bicyclists or motorists behaviors. They are a tool intended to provide guidance in route finding. FIGURE C-16 Bicycle Dots are not in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2009; and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 1999. They are not design standards, and should not be used as such. Application of guidance provided in this document requires experimental status through the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in conjunction with the use of engineering judgment. 2 They have been used in Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon. Bicycle Dots and the accompanying arrows may be used: 1. In lieu of signed routes that are not regional routes. Bicycle Dots should provide guidance where routes turn, and to confirm the route after the turn. Where two routes intersect Bicycle Dots should be supplemented with directional signage. 2. On signed regional routes at locations where route-finding guidance is needed but installing a sign is not feasible due to limited space or potential sign clutter. 3. In marked crosswalks where trail crossings intersect a roadway to guide bicyclists across the marked crosswalk. 4. Transitions from road to sidewalk or side path and vice-versa. 5. Miscellaneous spot locations based on engineering judgment. 2 For guidance on how to apply for experimental status, go to http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/condexper.htm 16

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE Placement Guidelines Bicycle Dots on non-arterial streets (no center turn lane): 1. Place a Bicycle Dot with appropriate arrow marking(s) 30 before the intersection at intersection approaches. 2. Place a Bicycle Dot approximately 50 from back of the sidewalk (sidewalk on cross street; private property side of sidewalk) when used to confirm a turn. 3. On streets with 2 parking lanes and 1 lane of travel place Bicycle Dots 11 from the curb. 4. On streets with no parking place Bicycle Dots in the middle of the lane assuming there are 2 lanes of travel. 5. If the width of street is 30 or less, combine confirmation and directional Bicycle Dots (see figure C-17 below). Dots should be placed at 50 from the intersection. If width of street is greater than 30, confirmation Bicycle Dots and directional Bicycle Dots should be separate as per guidelines 1 and 2. FIGURE C-17 17

CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST. LOUIS REGION FIGURE C-18 Bicycle Dots on arterial streets: 1. 30 before a right turn (with appropriate supplemental arrow). 2. 30 before any channelization if the turn requires merging into any lane other than the right most lane. This distance allows for bicyclists to position themselves in the proper lane in order to make the turn. 3. 50 after a turn to confirm the route. 4. 50 after major intersections to confirm the route. 5. Every ¼ mile of straight segment to confirm the route. 6. On arterials streets with parking lanes place Bicycle Dots 11 from the curb. 7. On arterial streets with no parking place Bicycle Dots in the middle of the right most lane. 18

Appendix C BICYCLE ROUTE AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE l " l l " l FIGURE C-19 Placement at Major Intersection Crossing Bicycle Dot placement at arterial crossing (with or without signal): 1. Place Bicycle Dot with arrow at approach to intersection. Place 30 from back (private property side) of sidewalk. 2. On far side of intersection with positive traffic control place confirmation Bicycle Dot 50 from back (private property side) of sidewalk on cross street. 19

This page intentionally left blank.