Managed Lanes: The Fitch Approach. Saavan Gatfield, Senior Director

Similar documents
Public Hearing October 21, 2014 University of North Florida Adam W. Herbert University Center Alumni Drive Jacksonville, FL 32224

Managed Lanes 2017: What They Are and How They Work. Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation

Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

Investing in Real Estate. The smart choice for today s investor

Sustainable Transportation Planning in the Portland Region

It s Been 15 Years Already?!

Managed Lanes: A Popular and Effective Urban Solution. Ed Regan Presented by Susan Buse

Preview. Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

National Housing Trends

TAMPA BAY EXPRESS (TBX)

What are Managed Lanes?

National Housing Trends

Roadway Congestion in Major Urban Areas: 1982 to 1988

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

Preview. Second midterm Tables in your paper Mass Transit as alternative to auto California s problems in urban transportation

5 THINGS TO KNOW IN Vail R. Brown, STR

National Housing Trends

National Housing Trends

Presented by: Keith Nichols, PE Principal Transportation Engineer, TTAC Agenda Item #14 October 7, 2015

Hotel InduSTRy Overview What Lies Ahead

Demographic Characteristics and Trends of Bexar County and San Antonio, TX

Golf Participation in the U.S Edition

Dr. Richard Wobbekind Executive Director, Business Research Division and Senior Associate Dean for Academic Programs University of Colorado Boulder

Kevin Thorpe Financial Economist & Principal Cassidy Turley

THE MOST INFORMATIVE EVENT COVERING REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

Public Transport and Development: Making It Work

Beyond Bullet Points: Statistics, Trends and Analysis

ORLANDO MSA MARKET OVERVIEW LAST UPDATED: MAY 2018

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

Section 1: Introduction

Lodging Market Update. Valley Hotel and Resort Association April 13, 2016 Presented by: Robert Hayward

91 Express Lanes Model Update 2006 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. Gerald V. Nielsten May 18, 2007

APPENDIX B Methodology for 2004 Annual Report

Arnold Hinojosa

Traffic Safety Facts. State Traffic Data Data. Overview

US LODGING INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

A Comparison of Highway Construction Costs in the Midwest and Nationally

Toll Express Lanes for the Research Triangle region Including discussion of possible applications on I-40

The Future of All Electronic Tolling Brian Patno Raytheon ITS Texas October 26, 2012

CONGESTED LOS ANGELES

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Application to Miami-Dade Transit

Carol Tomé CFO and Executive Vice President, Corporate Services

THE 2005 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT

DEVELOPING A POLICY TO PLAN AND OPERATE MANAGED LANES IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: LBJ IN DALLAS COUNTY AND AIRPORT FREEWAY IN TARRANT COUNTY

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

Overview of 64 Express Lanes. Secretary of Transportation Aubrey Layne April 12, 2017

Fundamental Certainty

Real Estate: Investing for the Future. Sponsored By:

Small Places, Smart Mobility

2012 Raleigh-Durham Market Forecast Investment Sales. Jeff Glenn CBRE Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Click to edit Master title style

2014 Economic Forecast: Boulder & Beyond. Keynote Presentation

13,351. Overall Statewide Results. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle? What is your primary means of transportation?

Golf Participation in the U.S Edition

What s Ahead for The Colorado Economy?

Appendix PIT Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Growth, Innovation, and the Future of the Arizona Economy. Michael Crow Arizona State University December 21, 2016

395 Express Lanes Extension

Safe Access to Transit:

THE 2004 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT

MOVEABLE BARRIER. Congestion Management Solutions

Technology and the Changing Face of Tollways

US 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY

THE FUTURE OF SALES TAX REVENUE

U.S. Economic and Apartment Market Overview and Outlook. July 15, 2014

GEOGRAPHY LESSON 1: PRE-VISIT - SAFE AT HOME LOCATION, PLACE AND BASEBALL BASEBALL COAST TO COAST HOUSTON ASTROS IN PARTNER WITH THE NBHOF

5. Golf Industry Trends and Developments in the US 6. The US Macro Economy Factors and Impact over Golf Industry

Zions Bank Economic Overview

International Trade Economic Forecasts An Overview of Orange County and Southern California Exports

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

There are three major federal data sources that we evaluate in our Bicycle Friendly States ranking:

IMPACTS TO TRANSIT FROM LOS ANGELES CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION. Word Count: 3,386 (body) + 2,000 (8 tables) + 1,500 (6 figures) = 6,886 words

IH 85 EXPRESS LANES ATLANTA, GA USDOT Congestion Reduction Demonstration Program Grant ($110M)

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

Riverside Rising Economic Outlook for the Region April 2015

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

Changing Demographics in the U.S. and the Impact on Congress

Southern Lodging Summit 2018

Sketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby

Briefing on the State of the State. presented to the. SCAA Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy

10 County Conference. Richard Wobbekind. Executive Director Business Research Division & Senior Associate Dean Leeds School of Business

Will 2016 Be the Last Hurrah for Commercial Real Estate? Presented By: John Chang First Vice-President Marcus & Millichap Research Services

Traffic Hotspots. Measuring the impact of congestion in the United States. Measuring September 2017 the impact of congestion in the United States

Form DOT F (8-72) 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHW AlTX 98/ Performing Organization Code

UNITED 2026 BID: TRAINING SITE AGREEMENT. Park Board Committee Meeting Monday, February 19, 2018

More of the Same; Or now for Something Completely Different?

US 1 Express Lanes Public Kick-Off Meeting

Richmond Area MPO Regional Transportation and Land Use Performance Measures 2013

Managed Lanes in California:

Colorado Counties Treasurers Association

Key Trends in the Meetings & Conventions Sector

Proposed Action, Purpose and Need Technical Memorandum

National Performance Management Measures. April 20, 2016 Webinar

Performance Measure Summary - Denver-Aurora CO. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

City of San Francisco 2009 Pedestrian Count Report. April 2010

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Appendix SEA Seattle, Washington 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Performance Measure Summary - San Jose CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Iowa DOT FHWA Safety Targets

Transcription:

Managed Lanes: The Fitch Approach Saavan Gatfield, Senior Director

HOT Lanes Getting Hotter Priced Managed Lanes Across the United States As of 4/27/14 Sources: HNTB Corporation; GAO analysis of USDOT, state departments of transportation; and local authorities information 1

Policies Matter Annual Toll Revenue and Operating Cost Operating Managed Lanes $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 I-35W Minneapolis, MN I-394 Minneapolis, MN Source: FHWA Managed Lanes Handbook Annual Revenues (Millions) I-25 Denver, CO I-15 San Diego, CA Annual Operating Costs (Millions) Hov 2+ I-10 Houston, TX Hov 3+ I-95 Miami, FL SR-91 Orange County, CA 2

Low Average Time Savings Observed I-95 Northbound Travel Time and Tolls (2012) Minutes Saved Minute Saved Typical Price 4 $4 3 $3 2 $2 1 $1 0 12:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM $0 Source: FDOT 3

ML Volume Volatile, Even in Congested Corridor 91 Express Lanes Average Daily Traffic Percentage Change Global ADT General Purpose ADT SR 91 ADT 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Source: OCTA 4

Evolution of ML Traffic 95 Express Lanes Northbound Annual ML Traffic by Hour Average Vehicles Per Lane Per Hour (VPLPH) 2009 2010 2011 2012 1H 2013 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 12:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM Source: FDOT 5

Change in Toll Rates 95 Express Northbound Annual Typical Toll Rate by Hour Typical Toll Rate $3.50 2009 2010 2011 2012 1H 2013 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 12:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM Source: FDOT 6

Volume to Capacity and Toll Price Affect Capture Rate 95 Express Lanes (FL) Northbound 2012 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Volume/ GP Capacity Capture Rate Typical Toll/ Mile $0.40 $0.30 $0.20 $0.10 0% 12:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM $0.00 Source: FDOT 7

Understanding the Project * Strength of service area * Competing facilities? * Connected locations * Radial v circumferential? * One/two directional traffic? * Regional travel patterns * Ingress / egress * Lane barriers What? Why? Where? When? 8

Understanding the Project Who? What For? How Often? Where does it fit in the system? Who uses it? Why? When is it busy? 9

Understanding the Project National Declining Per-Capita Driving Trend Vehicle-Miles Traveled, U.S. (millions) 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 Population Growth Critical Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) VMT per capita 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012* 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 * 2012 data based on U.S. Department of Transportation s (U.S. DOT) Traffic Volume Trends report. Previous years based on U.S. DOT Highway Statistics series of reports Source: US Department of Transportation 0 VMT Per Capita 10

Understanding the Project Forecast Growth Focused in Few States States with Highest Forecast Population Growth Pop Increase 2000 2030 (mm) 2030 Pop (mm) Annual Pop Growth Rate 2000 2030 1 Florida 12.7 28.7 2.0% 3 2 California 12.6 46.4 1.1% 1 3 Texas 12.5 33.3 1.6% 2 4 Arizona 5.6 10.7 2.5% 10 5 North Carolina 4.2 12.2 1.4% 7 6 Georgia 3.8 12.0 1.3% 8 7 Virginia 2.7 9.8 1.1% 12 8 Washington 2.7 8.6 1.3% 14 9 Nevada 2.3 4.3 2.6% 28 10 Maryland 1.7 7.0 0.9% 16 United States 82.2 363.6 0.9% 2030 Rank Source: United States Census Bureau, Fitch 11

Understanding the Project Top 10 MSAs by Employment Growth Forecast 2012 18 Growth Rank MSA Employment (000s) 2013 2019 CAGR % 1 Orlando, FL 1,065 1,255 2.77% 2 Houston, TX 2,788 3,278 2.74% 3 Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 1,226 1,431 2.60% 4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 3,090 3,602 2.58% 5 Phoenix, AZ 1,813 2,112 2.58% 6 Denver, CO 1,294 1,499 2.48% 7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL 2,349 2,666 2.13% 8 Portland, OR-WA 1,037 1,174 2.09% 9 Atlanta, GA 2,405 2,722 2.09% 10 Tampa- St. Petersburg, FL 1,177 1,331 2.07% Source: Global Insights Note: Data has been sorted to exclude MSAs with total employment less than 1 million 2012 12

Benchmarking & Stress Testing Source: NASA Is Traffic Forecasting Rocket Science? 13

Benchmarking & Stress Testing All Models Are Different! Source: NASA Source: NASA 14

Benchmarking & Stress Testing Indicative Sensitivities Peak Toll: Opening Year (Average per Mile, 2014$) $0.40 $0.70 Strong $0.30 $0.50 Moderate $0.20 $0.40 Weak Service Area 15

Benchmarking & Stress Testing Indicative Sensitivities Revenue CAGR 5.0 7.0% Strong 4.0 6.0% Moderate 3.0 5.0% Weak Service Area 16

People in pursuit of answers 17

Disclaimer Fitch Ratings credit ratings rely on factual information received from issuers and other sources. Fitch Ratings cannot ensure that all such information will be accurate and complete. Further, ratings are inherently forward-looking, embody assumptions and predictions that by their nature cannot be verified as facts, and can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed. The information in this presentation is provided as is without any representation or warranty. A Fitch Ratings credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security and does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. A Fitch Ratings report is not a substitute for information provided to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with a sale of securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch Ratings. The agency does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. 18

New York 33 Whitehall Street New York, NY 10004 London 30 North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5GN