Table 1. Key plant indicators observed during the study period. 75% green-up 100% green-up. Annual bluegrass 75% boot 16 April

Similar documents
Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Evaluation of Plant Growth Regulators and Fertilizer to Fairway Height Creeping Bentgrass J.A. Borger and M.B. Naedel 1

Post-emergent Goosegrass Control in a Mixed Stand of Fairway Turf with Sulfentrazone (Dismiss) and Fenoxaprop (Acclaim Extra), 2006

Early Dollar Spot Disease Control for Chicago Fairways

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Karine Paré Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University Jan. 3, 2008

2005 Turfgrass Research Report. In Cooperation With The

Objective: Rationale:

Amicarbazone, a Newer Herbicide for Annual Bluegrass Control In Bentgrass

Comparison of MON76980 (Xtendimax) and Liberty Herbicide Systems for weed control in Soybeans at Rochester, MN in SUMMARY:

1987 TURFGRASS SOIL RESEARCH REPORT. P. E. Rieke, M. T. McElroy and Douglas Lee Crop and Soil Sciences Department, M.S.U.

Bayer Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Putting Greens in Montana, Idaho, and Washington (Final Report)

Dollarspot continues to be a

Civitas + Harmonizer with or without Low Rates of Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Putting Greens in Washington

Heat stress separates old and new bentgrasses

2004 GREEN MAINTENANCE STUDIES Dr. Thomas Nikolai, L.D. McKinnon, C. Johnson Michigan State University

Charles T. Golob and William J. Johnston Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University June 5, 2013

Civitas Plus Harmonizer Tank Mixed with Reduced Rates of Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Putting Greens in Idaho and Washington

The Effect of Winter Protection Products on Putting Greens. D.D. Minner and F.J. Valverde Iowa State University Horticulture Department

Report Prepared for Old South Country Club. 17 July Turfgrass Disease Solutions, LLC Steve McDonald, M.S

Turf Screen Solar protectant tests on creeping bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera L. plant quality under stress conditions.

2000 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

2017 Turfgrass Proceedings

2012 Turfgrass Pathology Field Research

Evaluation of Burn Down Herbicides Before Overseeding Fairways

What to Do about Mixed-Species (Heinz 57) Fairways on Golf Courses: Eliminating Perennial Ryegrass with Corsair & Update on Controlling Earthworms

EPA Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPP September 22, 2017

Sep (Dollar spot fungicide Trial 2012) Site Description Page 1 of 14 University of California, Riverside

Report Prepared for Glen Oak Country Club September 2016 Turfgrass Disease Solutions, LLC Steven McDonald, M.S. On Saturday September 3 rd, I visited

HRI s Mission: Copyright, All Rights Reserved

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

Insect, Weed and Overseeding Management for Wendy Gelernter Ph.D.

Effects of Fungicides for Control of Spring Dead Spot Disease on Bermudagrass Turf in California

Bayer Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Fairways in Montana and Idaho (Final Report)

Syngenta/Bayer Fungicide Trial: Reduced Rates of Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Fairways in Idaho and Washington

The Use of Cold Tolerant Bermudagrasses on Northern Golf Courses

AMVAC - Snow Mold Control with Various Fungicide Combinations with AMV4820-G or Turfcide 400 on Fairways in Washington and Montana

Objective. Rationale. How It Was Done

TURFGRASS WEAR 1. Dr. James B. Beard Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Texas A&M University

North Carolina State University

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

Southern Illinois University BOLT Technology Herbicide Programs - Southern USA.

Snow Mold Recovery Observations. Introduction

National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) 2008 Bentgrass Green Test Progress Report. J. S. Ebdon, Ph. D., and W. T.

(09 SLL-1 Liberty Link SB) Site Description Page 1 of 13 Northeast Research & Extension Center

Minimum Daily Light Integral Requirements for Warm-Season Fairway/Tee and Rough Cultivars: Mowing Height and Growth Regulator Interactions

Hunters Ridge Golf & Country Club Bonita Springs, Florida

provide uniform green speeds from hole to hole on the same golf course.

2003 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

On the green. Poa control on greens: No longer impossible? Another look at poa management on greens and fairways. On the green Keep bentgrass healthy

National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) 2008 Bentgrass Fairway Variety Trial Progress Report. J. S. Ebdon, Ph. D., and W. T.

EVALUATION OF POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES ON EIGHT NATIVE GRASS SPECIES GROWN FOR SEED, Marvin Butler, Claudia Campbell, and Tom Shibley

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

Glen Oak Country Club. Steve McDonald Turfgrass Disease Solutions, LLC

Establishing and Trafficking New Bentgrass Putting Greens

USGA GREEN SECTION TURF ADVISORY SERVICE REPORT

This letter will serve as brief summary of the issues discussed during our follow up visit to Sewickley Heights Golf Club on Monday May 7, 2012

Turf Management I. Careers in Turf. Turf Terminology. Turf Quality 2/7/2008. Rapid Growth. Career Opportunities

(04 08 CRR-04 DUP USA Prequel North Pivot) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

PS 310 Introduction to Turfgrass Management Syllabus Fall Semester Leon Johnson Hall

North Carolina State University

Pollok Golf Club. Richard Windows Turfgrass Agronomist. for excellence in sports surfaces

Michigan State University participates in the

Performance of New Bermudagrass Varieties in the Southeast. Kyley

USGA GREEN SECTION TURF ADVISORY SERVICE REPORT

The Spartan Cap Athletic Field System

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Final Report. Herbicide screening trial. Les Mitchell Eurofins Agrisearch. Project Number: TU13032

Title: Solvita Soil Test Kits to Categorize Golf Course Fairway Responsiveness to Nitrogen Fertilization. Project Leader: Karl Guillard

Back to TOC PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Evaluation of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV)-resistant Tomato Varieties in Commercial Conditions

2011 Turfgrass Pathology Field Research

JAMES RIVER COUNTRY CLUB Newport News, Virginia

of various turfgrass species How to save irrigation water without sacrificing Turfgrass evapotranspiration coefficients

Summary Points. PGRs reduce clipping yield for a duration dependent upon air temperature.

16 th Days of Education 18 and 19 November 2014 Hotel Maestoso Lipica, Slovenia

ROLLING HILLS COUNTRY CLUB McMurray, Pennsylvania

DURBANVILLE GOLF CLUB COURSE REPORT FEBRUARY 2013

USGA GREEN SECTION TURF ADVISORY SERVICE REPORT

Isolation of the rapid blight pathogen Labyrinthula terrestris from Bermudagrasses in Arizona

Tidewater Ag. Res. & Ext. Ctr.

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AFFECTING PUTTING GREEN SPEED. The management practices identified in the survey of golf courses

USGA GREEN SECTION TURF ADVISORY SERVICE REPORT

plot with topdressing had greater root growth than the untreated check. Under compacted conditions, the Maple Lane Spiker and the Ryan 5/8 11

Zeon Zoysia Changed My Career and Life

Cutless 50W Turf Growth Regulator

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

Heavy Repetitive Fall Overseeding To Improve Low-Input Sports Fields

Lightweight rolling around the world

PLANT DEFENSE ACTIVATION USE AT MEADOW BROOK CLUB JOHN D. CARLONE, CGCS

EFFICIENT IRRIGATION FOR RECREATIONAL TURF IN NEW ENGLAND: EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND CROP COEFFICIENTS. Principal Investigators

FERNANDINA BEACH GOLF CLUB Fernandina Beach, Florida

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Determining Safety of Preemergence Herbicide Use During Propagation of Three Woody Ornamental Species

USGA GREEN SECTION TURF ADVISORY SERVICE REPORT SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS GOLF CLUB Sewickley, Pennsylvania

2. There was not any statistical difference between treatments

Key findings from a survey

DURBANVILLE GOLF CLUB COURSE REPORT APRIL 2013

Transcription:

Evaluation of Ethephon (Proxy) and Trinexapac-ethyl (Primo MAXX) Combinations for Suppression of Annual Bluegrass Seedheads on a Golf Course Putting Green Cale A. Bigelow and Glenn A. Hardebeck Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of three plant growth regulators for their ability to suppress annual bluegrass seedheads on a golf course putting green containing a mature mixed stand of annual bluegrass and creeping bentgrass. Experimental Procedures: All treatments were applied with a pressurized CO 2 (30 psi) sprayer equipped to deliver 1.0 gallon of spray volume per 1000 sq ft. Where specified, four treatments were initiated on 27 March, 2004 which co-incided with the date nearest the second mowing of the new growing season. The remaining treatments were initiated on 2 April. The dates, rates and actual application timings are all footnoted in the data tables. The study area was conducted on #6 putting green, a par-4 golf hole located at the Lafayette Municipal Golf Course in Lafayette, IN. This putting green had approximately 45 to 60 % annual bluegrass that was assumed to be primarily the annual biotype. The turf on this green was located in full sun and is cultivated on a native soil rootzone that had been regularly sand topdressed for several decades. Turf was maintained under typical municipal golf course practices which include daily triplex mowing at 0.150 inches and annual fertilization with approximately 3.0 lbs. of N/1000 sq ft. throughout the growing season. This site was selected because of its relatively uniform annual bluegrass population and long-term history of annual bluegrass. Plots were 5 ft x 5 ft, and arranged in a randomized complete block with four replications. In the absence of rainfall the plots were only irrigated to prevent stress. Several environmental indicators like percentage turfgrass green-up, annual bluegrass boot stage and timing of forsythia bloom. (Table 1) were recorded in order to provide key indicators for golf course managers to determine product application timings. Plots were rated for the presence of seedheads, turfgrass quality, and turf injury. Percent of plot area covered by seedheads was assessed on a linear 0 to 100 % scale where 0 = no seedheads observed, and 100 = entire plot area covered by seedheads. Turfgrass quality was assessed on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 equals brown or dead turf and 10 equals optimal greenness, density and uniformity. Turf injury was rated on a 0-5 scale where 0 = no injury and 5 = complete chlorosis. No injury was observed by any treatment during this study and therefore the data is not presented. Air and soil temperatures (0.25 and 2 inch depths) were continuously monitored throughout the study using logging temperature probes (Onset Corp.) adjacent to the putting green. Unfortunately the Lafayette Municipal course experienced a severe flood from the Wabash River during the second week of June which completely covered the environmental monitoring equipment. Therefore, the environmental data contained in this report are from the West Lafayette airport. 66

Table 1. Key plant indicators observed during the study period. Turfgrass 50 % green-up 75% green-up 100% green-up 24 March 26 March 1 April Annual bluegrass 75% boot 16 April Forsythia Bud extension 50% bloom 75% bloom 100% bloom 24 March 28 March 29 March 30 March Results: At initial application of all treatments the percentage of the plots containing annual bluegrass seedheads was rather low, (< 5 %), and remained that way until 16 April (Table 2). Over the next three weeks as air and soil temperatures increased (Table 3), the presence of seedheads increased. Compared to the untreated turf which had 24 % of the plot area covered by seedheads on 30 April, most treated plots had > 13 % seedheads which would certainly be noticeable to golfers. The Proxy + Primo Maxx combinations applied at the 2 nd mowing, the Proxy + Primo Maxx combination applied at 5.0 oz of Proxy one week after the 2 nd mowing and repeated three weeks later, and the Embark T/O application resulted in superior annual bluegrass seedhead suppression on 30 Apr. Seedheads in the untreated plots increased dramatically to, 39 % and 55% on 7 and 14 May, respectively. Seedheads present at this amount would severely disrupt ball roll on the putting green. On these two rating dates, there was no consistent seedhead suppression by any PGR or PGR combination. By, 21 May, seedheads decreased to 11 % of the plot in the untreated, but a second wave of seedheads, > 36%, was recorded on 28 May. This could possibly be explained by variation in annual bluegrass biotypes (e.g. some plants naturally flowered later) or fluctuating environmental conditions during this week of May. On the three worst seedhead rating dates, 7, 14 and 28 May when the untreated plots possessed > 36 % seedheads, no single treatment consistently reduced seedheads compared to the untreated plots. However, all treatments except Proxy + Primo Maxx (3.33 + 0.83 oz) applied three times and Embark T/O, effectively suppressed seedhead production on two of the three rating dates. Seedhead suppression during this period was lowered from 19-39 % compared to the untreated plots which had 36 55 % of the plot area covered with seedheads. Compared to Embark T/O applied on 27 March, which has historically been widely regarded in the industry as the standard for annual bluegrass seedhead suppression, no single Proxy + Primo Maxx treatment provided superior control until 14 May (Table 1). On that date the Proxy + Primo Maxx (3.0 + 0.125) treatment applied 1 week after the 2 nd mowing and repeated 1 WAT decreased annual bluegrass seedheads from 38 % to 16 %. By 21 May, numerous other Proxy + Primo Maxx combinations also provided superior seedhead suppression compared to Embark T/O. One possible reason for this response may have been that the Embark T/O was a single treatment application, whereas the Proxy + Primo Maxx treatments involved multiple applications which probably extended seedhead suppression. Turfgrass quality and color were visually assessed throughout the study. No discoloration was observed from any treatment during this experiment (data not shown). Thus, in this study under these environmental conditions all treatments were deemed safe for use on a municipal golf course putting green. However, previous reports have indicated mild chlorosis associated with certain environmental conditions during spring green-up and the manufacturer s product labels should be consulted prior to using these products on various bentgrass cultivars. 67

As expected, turfgrass quality generally increased as the study progressed (Table 3). This is attributed to more favorable growing conditions and an overall greener appearance as the turf grew more actively. The worst date for untreated turf quality was on 14 May. This date had highest seedhead ratings (55 %) which severely disrupted surface uniformity and was the reason for the poor quality rating. As with seedhead suppression ratings, no single treatment provided superior quality throughout the study. The most consistent treatment for turf quality was Proxy + Primo Maxx (3.33 + 0.083) applied three times, which provided superior quality compared to the untreated plots on four of the six rating dates. Additionally, Proxy + Primo Maxx (3.0 + 0.125) provided superior quality on three of six rating dates, indicating its promise for improving turf quality. In summary, no treatment consistently reduced annual bluegrass seedheads throughout this study. Several treatments, although erratic in their response showed significant benefit for reducing seedheads and improving visual turf quality during the peak seedhead production period from 7 to 28 May. On the worst seedhead rating date, 14 May, several treatments decreased percentage of the plot covered by seedheads from 55% to approximately 20 %. This would be much more tolerable from an aesthetic standpoint and in terms of ball roll or playability. These treatments included; Proxy + Primo Maxx at both the 3.0 and 5.0 oz Proxy rates applied at the 2 nd mowing and repeated 4 weeks after initial treatment, and Proxy Primo at both the 3.0 and 5.0 oz rates 1 week after the 2 nd mowing and repeated one week after initial application. Lastly three applications of Proxy (3.33 oz) + Primo (0.083 oz) applied three times on two week intervals starting at the 2 nd mowing improved turfgrass quality. Future research needs to continue to identify optimum application timings and rates of these PGRs to better suppress seedheads on putting greens. Thus, as has been well documented in the scientific literature, annual bluegrass continues to be a tenacious weed problem on putting green turf. An effective seedhead suppression program will likely require application(s) of a PGR or PGR combination that provides 6 to 8 weeks of suppression in order to limit seedhead production of all annual bluegrass biotypes present and account for variable environmental conditions from golf green micro-climate to micro-climate and year to year differences. Additionally, employing proper cultural practices to favor the desired turfgrass species throughout the growing season are essential in order to effectively reduce annual bluegrass populations. Acknowledgements This research was supported by a grant-in-aid from Bayer Environmental Sciences and the Midwest Regional Turf Foundation. Appreciation is extended to the staff at the Lafayette Municipal Golf Course for their maintenance of the test area and co-operation throughout the treatment application and data collection period. 68

Table 2. Visual seedhead ratings of a mixed creeping bentgrass/annual bluegrass native soil putting green as affected by various plant growth regulator application rates and timings,. Application Seedhead rating Treatment Rate Timing a 16 April 30 April 7 May 14 May 21 May 28 May 4 June oz /1000 ft 2 --------------------------------- (% seedheads) b ------------------------------------- Proxy + 3.0 2 nd mowing 2 bc c 15 b 26 abcd 21 bc 5 bcd 23 bc 6 b Proxy + 5.0 2 nd mowing 2 bc 13 b 27 abc 19 bc 5 bcd 15 c 3 b Proxy 3.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 3 ab 16 ab 15 bcd 35 abc 5 bcd 16 c 10 ab Proxy 5.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 4 a 14 b 30 ab 31 bc 6 bcd 18 c 3 b Proxy 3.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 3 ab 18 ab 18 bcd 34 bc 11 ab 24 bc 21 a Proxy 5.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 3 ab 18 ab 16 bcd 33 bc 10 abc 28 abc 9 ab Proxy 3.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 1 c 16 ab 11 cd 16 c 5 cd 21 bc 9 ab Proxy 5.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 2 bc 16 ab 9 d 18 bc 10 abc 28 abc 10 ab Proxy 3.33 2 nd mowing 2 bc 19 ab 23 abcd 19 bc 2 d 16 c 6 b Primo Maxx 0.083 + 2 weeks + 2 weeks Embark T/O 40 oz/a 2 nd mowing 2 bc 14 b 21 bcd 38 ab 13 a 41 a 15 ab Untreated --- --- 2 bc 24 a 39 a 55 a 11 ab 36 ab 16 ab a Treatments initiated at 2 nd mowing were applied on 27 March, 2004. All subsequent treatments were based off this date. The + 1 week, +2 weeks, + 3 weeks, and +4 weeks were applied on 2, 9, 16 and 23 April respectively. All treatments were applied in 1.0 gal 1000 ft 2 spray carrier volume. b Visual seedhead ratings were based on a 0-100 linear scale where 100 is turf canopy completely covered by annual bluegrass seedheads and zero is none. c Means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different according the LSD t-test (p=0.05). 69

Table 3. Visual turfgrass quality b ratings of a mixed creeping bentgrass/annual bluegrass native soil putting green as affected by various plant growth regulator application rates and timings, Application Treatment Rate Timing a 24 April 7 May 14 May 21 May 28 May 4 June oz /1000 ft 2 Proxy + 3.0 2 nd mowing 5.0 c c 5.8 bc 5.6 bc 6.0 bc 7.1 abc 7.5 ab Proxy + 5.0 2 nd mowing 5.0 c 5.3 cd 5.5 bc 6.0 bc 7.3 ab 8.0 a Proxy 3.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 5.8 ab 6.0 ab 6.0 ab 6.3 abc 7.4 ab 6.9 b Proxy 5.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 5.3 bc 5.5 bcd 6.0 ab 7.0 a 7.3 ab 7.5 ab Proxy 3.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 5.3 bc 5.5 bcd 5.5 bc 5.8 bc 7.0 abc 7.0 b Proxy 5.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 5.8 ab 6.0 ab 6.1 ab 6.3 abc 6.9 bc 7.1 ab Proxy 3.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 5.3 bc 5.9 abc 6.0 ab 6.5 ab 7.6 a 7.6 ab Proxy 5.0 1 wk after 2 nd mowing 5.5 abc 6.0 ab 6.0 ab 5.5 c 6.5 c 7.0 b Proxy 3.33 2 nd mowing 6.0 a 6.5 a 6.4 a 7.0 a 7.4 ab 7.3 ab Primo Maxx 0.083 + 2 weeks + 2 weeks Embark T/O 40 oz/a 2 nd mowing 5.8 ab 5.4 bcd 5.3 cd 6.0 bc 6.5 c 6.9 b Untreated --- --- 5.0 c 5.0 d 4.7 d 5.8 bc 6.7 bc 6.8 b a Treatments initiated at 2 nd mowing were applied on 27 March, 2004. All subsequent treatments were based off this date. The + 1 week, +2 weeks, + 3 weeks, and +4 weeks were applied on 2, 9, 16 and 23 April respectively. All treatments were applied in 1.0 gal 1000 ft 2 spray carrier volume. b Visual quality was based on a 0-10 scale where 0 equals brown dead turf, and 10 equals optimum greenness, density and uniformity. c Means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different according the LSD t-test (p=0.05). 70

Table 4. Maximum and minimum air and soil temperatures throughout the study, West Lafayette, IN 2004. Air Soil 4 depth Soil 4 under grass Date Max Min Max Min Max Min 27-Mar 69 55 64 53 58 52 28-Mar 75 55 65 55 59 54 29-Mar 62 47 65 51 58 53 30-Mar 53 41 55 48 54 51 31-Mar 51 38 56 45 51 48 1-Apr 49 34 52 41 49 45 2-Apr 55 33 59 38 50 43 3-Apr 63 32 61 39 50 43 4-Apr 48 34 58 41 49 43 5-Apr 54 26 63 37 51 41 6-Apr 67 38 62 42 52 44 7-Apr 70 43 69 48 55 47 8-Apr 59 42 64 51 53 50 9-Apr 59 31 66 44 54 46 10-Apr 59 37 66 48 54 48 11-Apr 54 35 67 47 54 48 12-Apr 49 34 53 44 50 46 13-Apr 47 33 51 41 47 44 14-Apr 66 28 65 38 52 42 15-Apr 72 43 68 46 54 46 16-Apr 79 55 73 54 58 50 17-Apr 83 62 79 59 62 55 18-Apr 84 64 77 62 63 58 19-Apr 80 56 76 65 63 59 20-Apr 65 49 64 57 60 56 21-Apr 69 51 67 58 60 57 22-Apr 53 45 56 51 58 54 23-Apr 66 45 70 50 59 52 24-Apr 63 43 61 50 57 53 25-Apr 67 52 65 55 59 55 26-Apr 63 42 67 48 57 53 27-Apr 53 36 65 46 55 51 28-Apr 75 41 69 49 56 50 29-Apr 76 58 72 57 59 54 30-Apr 75 59 75 59 61 56 1-May 53 43 65 51 60 54 2-May 54 42 63 48 56 51 3-May 54 35 62 45 56 51 4-May 61 40 64 47 55 51 5-May 73 46 78 51 61 53 6-May 85 57 81 58 64 56 7-May 72 53 70 61 62 59 8-May 85 51 82 54 65 56 9-May 84 63 83 64 67 61 71

Air Soil 4 depth Soil 4 under grass Date Max Min Max Min Max Min 10-May 83 66 82 68 67 63 11-May 81 64 80 66 69 64 12-May 83 66 82 65 69 65 13-May 75 65 74 68 67 65 14-May 73 54 70 62 67 65 15-May 58 50 66 57 64 61 16-May 71 44 76 53 65 59 17-May 81 59 80 60 67 62 18-May 79 60 80 66 68 64 19-May 79 56 79 62 68 64 20-May 79 68 75 67 69 66 21-May 86 71 82 69 72 67 22-May 83 71 86 69 72 69 23-May 74 69 72 68 70 68 24-May 76 58 79 62 70 66 25-May 72 61 74 65 69 66 26-May 72 55 80 61 69 65 27-May 81 59 77 65 70 65 28-May 68 51 80 61 70 65 29-May 79 46 84 57 69 62 30-May 80 64 75 67 68 65 31-May 71 62 73 66 68 66 1-Jun 76 55 79 59 69 64 2-Jun 69 57 77 63 66 64 3-Jun 72 48 81 57 68 62 4-Jun 77 47 86 59 70 61 72