ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Similar documents
Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Shortening or omitting a pedestrian change interval when transitioning into preemption

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Railroad and Light Rail Transit and Signals Technical Committees

Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council

PART 10. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR HIGHWAY-LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT GRADE CROSSINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Railroad and Light Rail Transit and Signals Technical Committees

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. Revision to Publication 149, Chapter 20 (Criteria for the Design of Traffic Signal Supports) - March 2009 Edition

Part 8. TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR RAILROAD AND LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT GRADE CROSSINGS

Rules of the Road Committee (RORC)

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

(This page left intentionally blank)

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

(This page left intentionally blank)

ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE (1) For

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Bicycle Technical Committee and Signals Technical Committee. Recommendation Bicycle Signal Faces

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

S 0659 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Traffic Control Devices

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

PART 7. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR SCHOOL AREAS CHAPTER 7A. GENERAL

Chapter 315 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Section Manual and Specifications For Traffic Control Devices.

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

This Manual Part recommends functional/operating guidelines for control of automatic grade crossing warning systems. Draft

2003 Edition Page 2B-1

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

CHAPTER 2F. TOLL ROAD SIGNS. Table 2F-1. Toll Road Sign and Plaque Minimum Sizes

(This page left intentionally blank)

2004 NC Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

Traffic Signs and Markings. Instructor: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Associate Prof. Of Transportation

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Markings Technical Committee Chapter 3H: Roundabout Markings APPROVED IN NCUTCD COUNCIL ON JANUARY 20, 2006

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Taking a Step back, can we make crossing the street less chancy? Kerry Wilcoxon City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

PART 5. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW-VOLUME ROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS

C. Best Practice Pedestrian Treatment Toolbox

800 RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS Traffic Engineering Manual

Windy Ridge Elementary School

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS

An Overview of the 2009 MUTCD

Proposed Language as approved by the NCUTCD on June 23, 2011, for new section on Pedestrian Channelizing Devices

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

2003 Edition Page 2C-1

Meadow Woods Elementary School

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

STREET and UTILITY REPAIRS WORK AREA PROTECTION GUIDE

Sets forth Basic Principles and Prescribes

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Table 1 Traffic and Pedestrian Counts on Lafayette Street

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

CHAPTER 12-7 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS, SIGNALS AND DEVICES

Task 4 Wayfinding Elements, Placement and Technical Guidance 4.1 Wayfinding Elements

Appendix Work Zone Traffic Control

MINNEAPOLIS PARK & RECREATION BOARD DRAFT TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR: SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SIGN AND MARKING PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

Orange Center Elementary School

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Including Revision 1 dated May 2012 and Revision 2 dated May 2012

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices II (MUTCD) Gregory J. Taylor, P.E.

Traffic Signs and Signals

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

Presented By: Jim Roth, P.E. Signing Engineer Office of Traffic Engineering Ohio Department of Transportation 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio

ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

CHAPTER 313 Traffic Control Devices

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

BICYCLE RULES OF THE ROAD

City of Dallas Standards and Guidelines for Traffic Control and Safety Treatments at Trail-Road Crossings

Transcription:

ATTACHMENT NO. 11 RRLRT No. 2 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: TOPIC: Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION RRLRT TC Draft: 06/23/2011 RRLRT TC Approval: 06/27/2014 Transmitted to Sponsors: 03/25/2014 Council Approval: 06/28/2014 ORIGIN OF REQUEST: AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: NCUTCD / RR/LRT TC Proposed New Section 8E SUMMARY: The purpose of these changes is to provide standardization of traffic control devices for grade crossings of highways with busways. Busways operate similar to light rail transit, and the proposed traffic control devices are similar. Where it is determined to be necessary based on engineering judgment, automatic gates may be used to supplement and enhance the meaning of traffic signal indications. Automatic gates may especially be of benefit where there are potential turning movement conflicts with the busway, where the bus operates at a speed that prevents safe stopping short of an obstruction within the busway. Where used, automatic gates at a highway-busway grade crossing would exhibit the operating characteristics of automatic gates used at highway-rail and highway-lrt grade crossings. DISCUSSION: Page 1of 10

The proposed changes have been reviewed bythe RR/LRT TC. It was recommended that the proposed changes be sent for sponsor comment for review at the January 2013 meeting of the NCUTCD. RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE MUTCD Note: All text proposed in this Recommended Change NEW to the 2009Edition of the MUTCD is shown in BLACK. Explanatory comments are shown in GREEN. Page 2of 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 CHAPTER 8E. BUSWAY GRADE CROSSINGS Section 8E.01 Introduction The design and operation of a busway is similar to light-rail transit in a semi-exclusive alignment. Guidance Highway-busway grade crossings should be equipped with an active busway grade crossing warning system unless an engineering study indicates that the use of STOP signs or YIELD signs alone would be adequate. Standard Where a busway and a railroad are adjacent to one another such that the active grade crossing warning system and the active busway grade crossing warning system share common grade crossing traffic control devices, the warning system for the railroad shall control the operation of all grade crossing traffic control devices, and the warning system for the busway shall be interconnected with the active grade crossing warning system to provide notification of an approaching bus to the active grade crossing warning system. Section 8E.02 Bus Only Lane Signs A Bus Only Lane (R15-4d or R15-4e) sign may be used on a roadway lane limited to only bus use to indicate the restricted use of a lane. The overhead R15-4e Bus Only Lane sign may be used as an alternative to the post-mounted R15-4d sign. Guidance: If used, the R15-4d Bus Only Lane sign should be installed on a post adjacent to the roadway containing the bus lane. See Chapter 2G for additional information regarding preferential lane signing. See Chapter 3D for information regarding preferential lane pavement markings. Standard: If used, the R15-4e Bus Only Lane sign shall be mounted over the lane to which it applies. Page 3of 10

45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 R15-4e Bus Only Lane Signs Section 8E.03 Bus-Activated Blank-Out Turn Prohibition Signs Busway operations can include the use of bus-activated blank-out signs for turn prohibition signs. The signs are typically used on roads paralleling a busway where road users might turn across a busway. Guidance: A bus-activated blank-out turn prohibition sign (R3-1, R3-2, R3-4, R3-18 or R3-27) should be used where an intersection is within 100 of a highway-busway grade crossing and is controlled by STOP sign, or is controlled by traffic control signals with permissive turn movements for road users crossing the busway. A bus-activated blank-out turn prohibition sign may include a blank-out BUS COMING message or a Bus Approaching blank-out warning sign (see Section 8E.05), or both. If used, the word message and the Bus Approaching sign may be flashed. As an alternative to bus-activated blank-out turn prohibition signs at intersections with traffic control signals, exclusive traffic control signal phases such that all movements that cross the busway have a steady red indication may be used in combination with No Turn on Red (R10-11, R10-11a, or R10-11b) signs (see Section Page 4of 10

77 78 79 80 81 82 2B.54). Standard: Turn prohibition signs that are associated with preemption or priority shall be visible only when the highway-busway grade crossing turn prohibition is in effect. 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 BUS COMING Bus-Activated Blank-Out Turn Prohibition Sign Section 8E.04 Highway-Busway Grade Crossing Advance Warning Signs Guidance: A Highway-Busway Grade Crossing Advance Warning sign should be used on each highway in advance of every busway grade crossing except in business or commercial areas where active highway-busway grade crossing traffic control devices are in use. A BUSWAY supplemental plaque should be installed with every Highway- Busway Grade Crossing Advance Warning sign. Page 5of 10

103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 Highway-Busway Grade Crossing Advance Warning Sign [The side view symbol of a bus is consistent with the side view symbols on vehicular traffic warning signs in Figure 2C-10. FHWA staff has confirmed that they will test alternative bus symbols before final approval of this sign] Section 8E-05 Busway Warning Sign A Busway Warning sign with a one-direction arrow for one-way busways or a two-direction arrow for two-way busways may be used at the crossing point of highway-busway grade crossings where there are no active traffic control devices. As an alternative to the Busway Warning sign, the legend TWO-WAY BUSWAY may be used at two-way busways. Page 6of 10

122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 Busway Warning Sign [The design of this sign is consistent with the design of crossing signs in Figures 2C-10 and 2C-11 which use the W16-7P diagonal downward pointing arrow when the sign is placed at the location of the crossing point. FHWA staff has confirmed that they will test alternative bus symbols before final approval of this sign] Section 8E.06 Bus Approaching-Activated Blank-Out Warning Sign The Bus Approaching-Activated Blank-Out warning sign supplements the traffic control devices to warn road users crossing the busway of an approaching bus. A Bus Approaching-Activated Blank-Out warning sign may be used at signalized intersections near busway grade crossings or at crossings controlled by STOP signs. 144 145 146 147 148 149 Bus-Activated Blank-out Sign [This sign is consistent with the front view symbol of LRT on the existing Page 7of 10

150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 W10-7 blank-out warning sign] Section 8E-07 Use of Traffic Control Signals for Control of Buses at Busway Grade Crossings Busway grade crossings can occur at intersections or at midblock locations, including public and private driveways. Guidance: Bus movements at busway grade crossings that are equipped with traffic control signals should be controlled by special bus signal indications. Bus signals that are used to control only bus movements should display the light rail transit signal indications illustrated in Figure 8C-3. Standard traffic control signal indications may be used instead of bus signals to control the movement of buses. Standard: If a separate set of standard traffic control signal indications (red, yellow, and green circular and arrow indications) is used to control bus movements, the indications shall be positioned so they are not readily visible to motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists (see Section 4D.12). If the busway crossing control is separate from the intersection control, the two shall be interconnected. The signal indications conflicting with the bus phase shall not be shown until after the bus has cleared the crossing. Bus signals may be used at busway grade crossings and at intersections where buses operate in mixed traffic in conjunction with standard traffic control signals where special bus signal phases are used to accommodate turning bus vehicles or where additional bus clearance time is desirable. Guidance: Bus signal faces should be separated vertically or horizontally from the nearest highway traffic signal face for the same approach by at least 3 ft. At busway grade crossings with traffic control signals, preemption control or priority control of the traffic control signal may be given to buses. Section 4D.27 contains information about preemption and priority control of traffic control signals. Page 8of 10

195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 Section 8E-08 Busway Automatic Gates Automatic gates may be used to supplement traffic control signals at highwaybusway grade crossings. Standard: Busway automatic gates, if used, shall conform to standards set forth in Section 8C.04 for Automatic Gates and shall be standard railroad size, striped with 16-inch alternate vertical, fully retroreflectorized red and white stripes. Flashing red lights in accordance with the Standards for those on railroad gates shall be included on the gate arm and they shall only be operated if the gate is closed or in the process of being opened or closed. In the horizontal position, the top of the gate shall be approximately 4 feet above the pavement. Busway automatic gates, if used, shall be interconnected with the busway traffic control signals. Busway automatic entrance gates shall be designed to fail-safe in the down position. Four quadrant Busway Automatic Gates shall conform to requirements set forth in Section 8C.06. Section 8C.04 contains further details regarding automatic gates and Section 8D.06 contains details regarding pedestrian automatic gates. Section 8E-09 Traffic Control Signals Near Highway-Busway Grade Crossings If a traffic control signal is near an active busway grade crossing warning system, refer to Manual Parts 8C.09, 8C.10, 8C.11 and 8C.12. Section 8E-10 Pathway-Busway Grade Crossings A pathway-busway grade crossing may be controlled using bus signals for the busway approaches and pedestrian signals for the pathway approaches if the operation of the busway provides for the bus to be able to stop before entering the pathway. A Busway Warning sign may be used at pathway-busway grade crossings with no active traffic control devices. Standard: If an active busway grade crossing warning system is used at a pathway- Page 9of 10

241 242 busway grade crossing, a bell or other audible warning device shall be provided for each pathway approach to the crossing. Page 10of 10