Downtown Signals Traffic Analysis

Similar documents
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOLUTIONS ANDREA HARTH, PE, PTOE TEC ENGINEERING, INC.

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

CITY OF CASSELBERRY WINTER PARK DRIVE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

Crosswalk Policy Revisions & Pedestrian & Bicycle Connection Plans. Presentation to Sanibel City Council July 16, 2013

Traffic Signal Study. City of Marysville, Ohio. ms consultants, inc. engineers, architects, planners 2221 Schrock Road Columbus, Ohio

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ASSESSMENT SR 934/NORMANDY DRIVE AND 71 Street

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

1 To provide direction to Administration when determining the appropriate Pedestrian Crossing Control Device for a particular location.

Signal Warrant Studies

Project Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Mandan Commission Meeting August 2, 2016 Mandan City Hall

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

Alexander Ikefuna City of Charlottesville Director of Neighborhood and Development Services

DRAFT Old Worthington Mobility Study Phase 2 High Street Pedestrian Crossings City of Worthington, Ohio

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

Session 76 Pedestrians and Intersections

S.R. 3009, Section A20 South Park & Logan Road Intersection Improvement Project

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Advancing Transportation Choices in Des Moines. MPO Environmental Roundtable January 9, 2018

Establishing Procedures and Guidelines for Pedestrian Treatments at Uncontrolled Locations

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

STATUS OF 2009 PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN (AS OF DECEMBER 2013)

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Safety Effectiveness of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

Transportation Policy Manual

including shade trees; Recommend minimum 13 ft total sidewalk

Transportation Planning Division

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY Various Crosswalk Locations Oberlin, Ohio

Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation

ST. PETERSBURG CITY COUNCIL. Consent Agenda. Meeting of February 5, The Honorable Charlie Gerdes, Chair and Members of City Council

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Traffic Signals at Bike Boulevards

SBCAG STAFF REPORT Federal Transportation Improvement Program. MEETING DATE: January 19, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: 5E

Observations and Ideas: Toomer s Corner Streetscape Improvements

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

November 2012: The following Traffic and Safety Notes were revised:

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Guidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways

Military Road Safety Improvements

Hennepin County Transportation Department

TECH MEMOS #3 & #4 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS TRAVEL FORECASTING APPROACH CITY OF NOVI THOROUGHFARE MASTER PLAN

Fisher Ave and Snoqualmie Parkway Signal

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Guidelines for Pedestrian Treatments at Uncontrolled Locations

City of Scotts Valley CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

FUNDING OPTIONS FOR COMPLETE STREETS PROJECTS. Dean Ledbetter, PE Senior Planning Engineer NCDOT Division Eleven

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

Operations -- Transit From: N/A To: N/A. Improvement Type: Regionally Significant: No

MEMORANDUM. Nick Hutchinson, P.E., City Engineer Public Services Area Project Management Services Unit

Traffic Signal Redesign 50% Design Report

Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017

Traffic Engineering Update on Bike/Ped Topics. Marc Lipschultz, P.E. PTOE Central Office Traffic Engineering Division

Traffic Control Devices

THE NACTO MANUALS AND DESIGNING FOR VISION ZERO ZAKI MUSTAFA SHIRLEY ZAMORA

City of Moorhead Committee of the Whole Meeting

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Roundabout Evaluations in Virginia: US 15/US 50 Gilberts Corner, VA SR 106/SR 634 Prince George County, VA

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Broadway Street Pedestrian Safety Study Cass Street to 700 Feet North of Randall Avenue

Marshall Metcalf, P.E. Dan Mlacnik, P.E. Division of Highways/District 6 February 24, 2015

C. Best Practice Pedestrian Treatment Toolbox

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLAY COUNTY

Pedestrian Road Safety Audit

Complete Streets Funding Program Project Prioritization Plan

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Community Meeting #1

MEMORANDUM. Discussion of the planned crosswalk improvement on Mount Vernon Road near Stratham Drive

Arlington Public Schools New Elementary School at Thomas Jefferson Site Off-Site Transportation. Thomas Jefferson BLPC / PFRC Meeting July 27, 2016

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Hillsboro Tanasbourne Town Center

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

Meadow Woods Elementary School

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines 2016

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

CITY OF LANCASTER PROPOSED NEW PROJECTS

Topic No January 2000 Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies Revised July Chapter 8 GAP STUDY

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Transcription:

Downtown Signals Traffic Analysis City of St. Mary s April 16, 2018

Presented by: Allan Heitbrink, P.E. & Craig Eley, P.E.

Who We Are Craig Eley, P.E o o o Previously the ODOT D7 Traffic and Safety Engineer. 25+ years in traffic. Responsible for approximately 140 signalized intersections, performed maintenance, installation, upgrades, etc. o Project Engineer on major signal upgrades in Bellefontaine and Urbana. o Retired from ODOT in 2014. o Joined Choice One in 2015. Allan Heitbrink, P.E. o Graduated from University of Dayton in 2013, BS in Civil Engineering. o Joined Choice One in 2013. o o o Northwestern Center for Public Safety in Chicago, 2014. Concentrating on traffic engineering. Project Engineer and Lead Designer on 35 traffic signals.

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal Advantages & Disadvantages

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal Advantages & Disadvantages

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal Advantages & Disadvantages

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal Advantages & Disadvantages As maintaining agency periodic review of all traffic signals is necessary.

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal Advantages & Disadvantages As maintaining agency periodic review of all traffic signals is necessary. Funding need to know if the traffic signals are warranted.

So Why Study? OMUTCD Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Signal Warrants 1. Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume 2. Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 3. Peak Hour 4. Pedestrian Volume 5. School Crossing 6. Coordinated Signal System 7. Crash Experience 8. Roadway Network 9. Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Basis for Installation or Removal Advantages & Disadvantages As maintaining agency periodic review of all traffic signals is necessary. Funding need to know if the traffic signals are warranted. Suggested improvements for the signals remaining.

Project Information Analyzed thirteen (13) signalized intersections in the downtown area Reviewed the operations and timing at each location Locations included: 1. High & Wayne 2. High & Main 3. High & Front 4. Spring & Wayne 5. Spring & Main 6. Spring & Front 7. Spring & Ped. #1 8. Spring & Ped #2 9. Spring & Chestnut 10. Spring & Spruce 11. Spring & Pine 12. Spring & Vine 13. Main & South Analysis included: turn movement counts, signal warrant analysis, operations analysis, and recommendations for potential operation improvements.

Map of Improvements

Existing Signals to be Rebuilt Main & High, Main & Spring, Main & South, Spring & Spruce to be rebuilt/upgraded in the future as funding allows

Existing Signals to be Rebuilt MAIN STREET & HIGH STREET: Upgrade signal to meet OMUTCD & ODOT Standards. Adjust signal timing. Add a left turn phase for the NB and SB directions. Add side and main street detection. Install pedestrian signals/pushbuttons. Update curb ramps. Main & High, Main & Spring, Main & South, Spring & Spruce to be rebuilt/upgraded in the future as funding allows

Existing Signals to be Rebuilt MAIN STREET & SPRING STREET: Upgrade signal to meet OMUTCD & ODOT Standards. Adjust signal timing. Add a left turn phasing. Add side and main street detection. Install pedestrian signals/pushbuttons. Update curb ramps. Install left turn signs to mast arms. Main & High, Main & Spring, Main & South, Spring & Spruce to be rebuilt/upgraded in the future as funding allows

Existing Signals to be Rebuilt SPRING STREET & SPRUCE STREET: Upgrade signal to meet OMUTCD & ODOT Standards. Adjust signal timing. Add side and main street detection. Install pedestrian signals/pushbuttons. Update the SE & NE curb ramps. Main & High, Main & Spring, Main & South, Spring & Spruce to be rebuilt/upgraded in the future as funding allows

Existing Signals to be Rebuilt MAIN STREET & SOUTH STREET: Upgrade signal to meet OMUTCD & ODOT Standards. Adjust signal timing. Add side and main street detection. Install pedestrian signals/pushbuttons. Update the curb ramps. Main & High, Main & Spring, Main & South, Spring & Spruce to be rebuilt/upgraded in the future as funding allows

Existing Signals to be Removed

Wayne St. & High Street Remove existing traffic signal and install four-way stop. Existing poles and overhead lights to remain. Existing signal is not warranted. No intersection sight distance issues. 2 crashes in 3 years.

High St. & Front Street Remove existing traffic signal and install four-way stop. Existing signal is not warranted. 4 crashes in 3 years. On-street parking to remain. Update curb ramps to meet current ADA requirements.

Wayne St. & Spring Street Remove existing traffic signal and install four-way stop. Strain poles are to remain, since luminaires are on the poles. Existing signal is not warranted. 3 crashes in 3 years.

Spring St. & Front Street Remove existing traffic signal with Spring Street Reconstruction project. Install two-way stop along Front Street. Existing signal is not warranted. Buildings create ISD problems. 8 crashes in 3 years.

Spring St. & Front Street Remove existing traffic signal with Spring Street Reconstruction project. Install two-way stop along Front Street. Existing signal is not warranted. Buildings create ISD problems. 8 crashes in 3 years. Bump outs Increase ISD & shorter pedestrian crossing

Pedestrian Crossings & Spring Street Remove existing pedestrian signal. Install pedestrian signs and enhance crosswalks with pavement markings. Existing signals are not warranted. 2 crashes at West crossing 4 crashes at East crossing

Pedestrian Crossings & Spring Street Remove existing pedestrian signal. Install pedestrian signs and enhance crosswalks with pavement markings. Existing signals are not warranted. 2 crashes at West crossing 4 crashes at East crossing Consider installing a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)

Chestnut Street & Spring Street Remove existing traffic signal with Spring Street Reconstruction Project. Install two-way stop along Chestnut Street. EB approach should be restriped to a single Left/Thru/Right lane. Update curb ramps to meet ADA requirements Signal is not warranted. 4 crashes in 3 years. Buildings on SE & SW corners create ISD problems.

Chestnut Street & Spring Street Remove existing traffic signal with Spring Street Reconstruction Project. Install two-way stop along Chestnut Street. EB approach should be restriped to a single Left/Thru/Right lane. Update curb ramps to meet ADA requirements Signal is not warranted. 4 crashes in 3 years. Buildings on SE & SW corners create ISD problems. Bump outs improve ISD

Spring Street & Pine Street Signal is not warranted. 4 crashes in 3 years. Remove existing traffic signal. Install two-way stop along Pine Street. Remove 1-2 spots to further enhance ISD. Update curb ramps on NW & NE corners.

Spring Street & Vine Street Signal is not warranted. 4 crashes in 3 years Remove existing traffic signal. Install two-way stop along Vine Street. Remove approx. 100 ft. of parking along the east leg of Spring St. on the north side to increase ISD. Update the NW & NE curb ramps.

Map of Improvements

Questions Craig Moeller City of St. Marys 419.394.3303 X3118 cmoeller@cityofstmarys.net Craig Eley Choice One Engineering 937.497.0200 cce@choiceoneengineering.com Allan Heitbrink Choice One Engineering 937.497.0200 ajh@choiceoneengineering.com