Longhorn Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta longiantenna)

Similar documents
Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp (Lepidurus packardi)

Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi)

SEASONAL OCCURRENCE AND HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME VERNAL POOL BRANCHIOPODA IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, U.S.A. Sean P. Gallagher

Biology & Ecology of large branchiopods

A.23 RIVER LAMPREY (LAMPETRA

Preserving Biodiversity

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense)

Klamath Lake Bull Trout

Catlow Valley Redband Trout

Frequently Asked Questions About Revised Critical Habitat and Economic Analysis for the Endangered Arroyo Toad

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

Marine Ecosystems. Aquatic Ecosystems Section 2

Restored Vernal Pools in California and post-creation Monitoring and Management Introduction Vernal Pool Context Biota of Vernal Pools

Scientific Name: Ameiurus melas Common Name: Black bullhead BISON No.:

Description of the Fields

Protect Our Reefs Grant Interim Report (October 1, 2008 March 31, 2009) Principal investigators: Donald C. Behringer and Mark J.

CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND SUSTAINING S LIVELIHOODS ALONG THE MEKONG RIVER IN LUANG PHRABANG, XAYABOURI AND

AQUATIC HABITAT AND LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS PREDICT DISTRIBUTION OF AMPHIBIANS IN ELKHORN SLOUGH. January 16 th, 2007

Managing floodplain productivity: Slow it down, Spread it out, Grow em Up

We Should Protect Vulnerable Vernal Pools

Habitat Fact Sheets. Rocky habitats are dominated by seaweeds and often mussels, which rely on the rocks for attachment.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

ESA, Proposed Threatened ESA, Threatened New Mexico-WCA, Endangered

Warner Lakes Redband Trout

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

ESRM 350 Habitat Loss and Fragmentation

Covered Species Accounts Green Sturgeon

INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR THE DOS PALMAS AREA

Overview of Federal and State Wildlife Regulations

Oceans Humans both depend on it and threaten it with their activities

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Other Relevant International Standards OIE Global Conference on Rabies Control 7-9 September 2011, Incheon, Korea

Oregon Spotted Frogs 101. Deanna Lynch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Western native Trout Status report

Living World Review #2

Species at Risk Act (SARA) Consultation Workbook

Extinction. The real reason dinosaurs went extinct

Living Beaches: Integrating The Ecological Function Of Beaches Into Coastal Engineering Projects and Beach Management

SPECIES FACT SHEET. Common Name: Siuslaw Sand Tiger Beetle or Siuslaw Hairy-necked Tiger Beetle

Ireland s biodiversity at risk

Sustaining Wild Species

Goldfish Removal Millar s Pond. Resort Municipality of Whistler

Our foundation introduce Nature and conservation in Lake Izunuma Uchinuma.

Wildlife in the Classroom

Crossing Corridors. Objective. Materials. Background Information

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

WHALE SHARK (Rhincodon typus) RECOVERY PLAN

Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District

Understanding the Impacts of Culvert Performance on Stream Health

Malheur Lakes Redband Trout

Coho Salmon 1. COMMON NAMES: Silver salmon, Coho, blue back, silversides, and jack salmon.

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Community Conservation Plan

Sustaining the Great Salt Lake Brine Shrimp Resource

Policy Position Statement on Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and hybrids in Ireland and Northern Ireland

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

October 5, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Union Pacific Railroad

CARL BLACKWELL LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Aggregate Permit Applications: Natural Environment Report A.R Yes. Lands & Waters Aggregate & Petroleum Resources March 15, 2006

Productivity per unit area (m 2 ) Total Productivity (global)

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

Section 2: Biodiversity at Risk

*attached below (scroll down)*

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

First Nations Fish Habitat Program Discussion Workbook

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

A.21 SACRAMENTO SPLITTAIL (POGONICHTHYS

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

Managing Chesapeake Bay s Land Use, Fish Habitat, and Fisheries: Studies. Jim Uphoff & Margaret McGinty, Fisheries Service

What is a CTS. Amphibian Conservation. CTS Pre-Test. California Tiger Salamander Biology and Conservation. Pete Trenham

FACT SHEET I. LOCATION

Searsville Dam Removal

State of San Francisco Bay 2011 Appendix O Steelhead Trout Production as an Indicator of Watershed Health

Managing Development and Chesapeake Bay s Estuarine Fish

Field Guide: Teacher Notes

A Forest Without Elephants: Can We Save One of Earth s Iconic Species?

The great obstacle is simply this: the conviction that we cannot change because we are dependent on what is wrong. But that is the addict s excuse,

Deschutes Bull Trout

The Ribbet Hypothesis

Blending Research, Management, Outreach, and Policy to Recover a Federally Listed Species. Megan M. Seymour

Florida Key deer Odocoileus virginianus clavium

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 10

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Shelly Cotterman Nashville Zoo

Endangered Species Act Application in New York State What s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver

Chapter 11: Sustaining Biodiversity-The Species Approach

Aquatic Biological Assessment. Lassen 15 Restoration Project. Modoc National Forest Warner Mountain Ranger District

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Wildlife Introduction

Willamette River Oregon Chub

The Salmonid Species. The Salmonid Species. Definitions of Salmonid Clans. The Salmonid Species

Transcription:

Status State: Meets the requirements as a rare, threatened, or endangered species under CEQA Federal: Endangered Critical Habitat: Designated 2006 (USFWS 2006) Population Trend Global: Declining due to habitat loss and fragmentation (Eriksen and Belk 1999) State: As above Within Inventory Area: Unknown Data Characterization The location database for the longhorn fairy shrimp (Branchinecta longiantenna) within the inventory area includes 2 records from 1982 and 1990 near the Los Vaqueros Reservoir (Eng et. al. 1990, California Natural Diversity Database 2001). These 2 locations are shallow, sandstone-rock-outcrop vernal pools within non-native grassland. Other natural and artificial habitats have a high probability of being occupied by additional populations of the longhorn fairy shrimp throughout the grassland habitats within the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area. In addition to the original description (Eng et. al. 1990), Eriksen and Belk (1999) presented a brief discussion of the longhorn fairy shrimp and provided a distribution map. Hill and Shepard (1997) produced a scanning electron micrograph of the cyst (resting egg), and Helm (1997) provided some generalized natural history data. No other peer-reviewed technical literature has been published concerning the longhorn fairy shrimp. Range Only 8 populations of the longhorn fairy shrimp are known (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1996). Longhorn fairy shrimp occurrences are rare and highly disjunct with specific pool characteristics largely unknown (USFWS 2003). The Altamont pass subunits of the species occur within clear depression pools in sandstone outcrops (Eriksen and Belk 1999; EBRPD 2001; CNDDB 2002). Other populations in the middle and southern range of the species occur in loam and shallow alkaline soil, respectively (USFWS 2003). Occurrences within the ECCC HCP/NCCP Inventory Area Two records for this species exist in the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area: sandstone outcrops on both the Souza Ranch (type locality), and in Vasco Caves East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 1

Regional Preserve. The paucity of data points within the inventory area may be due to a lack of survey effort. Critical habitat has been designated for the species in Vasco Caves Regional Preserve (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2006). Biology Habitat Typical habitat for listed fairy shrimp in California include vernal pools, seasonally ponded areas within vernal swales, and ephemeral freshwater habitats (USFWS 2003). Other kinds of depressions that hold water of a similar volume, depth, and area, and for a similar duration and seasonality as vernal pools and ponded areas within swales also may be potential habitat. These other depressions--typically artificial habitats and partially or completely unvegetated-- may be suitable for this species. Examples of artificial habitats that may be suitable for this species are railroad toe-drains, roadside ditches, abandoned agricultural drains, ruts left by heavy construction vehicles, and depressions in firebreaks (Eng et al. 1990). Longhorn fairy shrimp in Contra Costa and Alameda Counties are primarily reported from water pooled in sandstone depressions. Vernal pools in other parts of California that support these fairy shrimp are either loam and sandy loam or shallow, alkaline pools (USFWS 1994). The seasonal pool habitat is subject to seasonal variations, and longhorn fairy shrimp are dependent on the ecological characteristics of such variations. These characteristics include duration of inundation and presence or absence of water at specific times of the year (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994). The longhorn fairy shrimp is capable of living in vernal pools of relatively short duration (pond 6 to 7 weeks in winter and 3 weeks in spring) (Eriksen and Belk 1999). Feeding Longhorn fairy shrimp are omnivorous filter-feeders. Fairy shrimp indiscriminately filter particles from the surrounding water, including bacteria, unicellular algae, and micrometazoa (Eriksen and Belk 1999). The precise size of items these fairy shrimp are capable of filtering is currently unknown. However, fairy shrimp will attempt to consume whatever material they can fit into their feeding groove and do not discriminate based upon taste, as do some other crustacean groups (Eriksen and Belk 1999). Ecology Longhorn fairy shrimp are a component of the planktonic crustacea within seasonal temporary pools and can occur in densities as high as 200 per liter of water. Planktonic crustacea are important in the food web, as they represent a high-fat, high-protein resource for migratory waterfowl. Mallard, Green-winged East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 2

Teal, Greater Yellowlegs, and Killdeer all forage actively in Central Valley vernal pools on the invertebrate and amphibian fauna during the winter months. Predator consumption of fairy shrimp cysts (resting eggs) aids in distributing populations of fairy shrimp. Predators expel viable cysts in their excrement, often at locations other than where they were consumed (e.g., Wissinger et al. 1999). If conditions are suitable, these transported cysts may hatch at the new location and potentially establish a new population. Cysts can also be transported in mud carried on the feet of animals, including livestock, that may wade through their habitat (Eriksen and Belk 1999). Beyond inundation of the habitat, the specific cues for hatching are unknown (Eriksen and Belk 1999), although temperature is believed to play a large role. Typically, midvalley fairy shrimp mature in about 16 days when water temperatures reach at least 20 degrees Celsius (Eriksen and Belk 1999). Longhorn fairy shrimp have been reported to co-occur with the vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi). Threats Longhorn fairy shrimp are threatened by the same activities as other vernal pool invertebrates. These threats include the conversion of vernal pool habitat to agricultural lands and urban development, and extinction because of the small and isolated nature of remaining populations (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994). The limited and disjunct distribution of vernal pools, coupled with the even more limited distribution of the longhorn fairy shrimp, means that any reduction in vernal pool habitat could adversely affect this species. Habitat fragmentation can isolate and reduce population size, resulting in a process of progressive population extinction. Small or isolated populations are more susceptible to extinction from random environmental disturbance. Recolonization opportunities are also diminished when physical barriers, such as development or lack of vernal pool habitat, isolate populations from one another or inhibit transport of cysts. Isolated populations are potentially more susceptible to inbreeding depression, which can result in local extinction or reduced fitness (Gilpin and Soule 1986, Goodman 1987a, 1987b). However, this has never been demonstrated for branchiopod crustaceans. Activities that alter the suitability of habitat may impact the special-status crustaceans dependent on these habitats. These activities include damaging the impermeable clay and /or hardpan layers of the habitat bottom, filling in the habitat, altering (e.g. through contaminants) or destroying the watershed that conveys overland flow into the habitat. Additionally, introduction of non-native plants, destruction or degradation of the surrounding upland habitat, introduction of fish (such as Gambusia spp.) into special-status shrimp habitats, and activities that would discourage or prevent waterfowl and waders from feeding at occupied habitats and thereby restrict gene-flow between populations would also significantly affect longhorn fairy shrimp populations. East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 3

Conservation and Management Because comprehensive surveys for the longhorn fairy shrimp in the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area have not been conducted and known occurrences throughout the species range are based mostly on incidental observations (e.g., CNDDB), the population size and locations of this species in the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area are not known. Also, suitable habitat for the longhorn fairy shrimp in the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area was identified based on a general classification of land-cover types. Field evaluation of the habitat classification has not been conducted, and the extent to which vernal pools in the inventory area meet the habitat requirements of longhorn fairy shrimp is unknown. Also, the importance of artificial habitats that may support longhorn fairy shrimp in the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area has not been evaluated. However, the dependency of this species on vernal pool habitats provides some useful information on the types of impacts that can occur to longhorn fairy shrimp from covered activities. Based on its restricted distribution, the current USFWS conservation requirement for this species is that no take (individuals or habitat) will be allowed. Species Distribution Model No species distribution model could be developed for the longhorn fairy shrimp because suitable microhabitats (sandstone vernal pools) occur at too small a scale to be mapped in the inventory area. Literature Cited Eng, L., D. Belk, and C. Eriksen. 1990. Californian Anostraca: Distribution, Habitat, and Status. Journal of Crustacean Biology 10(2):247 277. Eriksen, C. and D. Belk. 1999. Fairy shrimps of California s pools, puddles, and playas. Mad River Press, Eureka, California. Gilpin, M. E. and M. E. Soule. 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Pp. 11 34 in M. E. Soule, ed. Conservation Biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer and Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA. Goodman, D. 1987a. The demography of chance extinction. Pp. 11 34 in M. E. Soule, ed. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain. Goodman, D. 1987b. How do species persist? Lessons for conservation. Conservation Biology 1:59 62. East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 4

Helm, B. 1997. The biogeography of eight large branchiopods endemic to California. Pp 124-139 in: C.W. Witham, E. Bauder, D. Belk, W Ferrin, and R. Ornduff (eds.), Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems Proceedings from a 1996 conference. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Hill, R. E. and W. D. Shepard. 1997. Observations on the identification of California anostracan cysts. Hydrobiologia 359:113 123. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. September 19, 1994. Federal Register Final Rule; determination of endangered status for the conservancy fairy shrimp, longhorn fairy shrimp, and the vernal pool tadpole shrimp; and threatened status for the vernal pool fairy shrimp.. April 19, 1996. Interim survey guidelines to permittees for recovery permits under Section 10(a) (1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act for the listed vernal pool brachiopods.. August 6, 2003. Federal Register Final Rule; designation of critical habitat for four vernal pool crustaceans and eleven vernal pool plants in California and southern Oregon.. February 10, 2006. Federal Register Final Rule; Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Designation of Critical Habitat for Four Vernal Pool Crustaceans and Eleven Vernal Pool Plants, Final Rule. Federal Register 71(28):7118 7316. Wissinger, S. A., A. J. Bohonak, H. H. Whiteman, and W. S. Brown. 1999. Habitat Permanence, salamander predation and invertebrate communities. In: Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North America: Ecology and Management, edited by D. P. Batzer, R. B. Bader, and S. A. Wissinger, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. NY. East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 5