Appendix A. Figures. Proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Bank Areas

Similar documents
Montana Natural Heritage Program 1515 East Sixth Ave., Helena, Montana (406)

Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tulsa, Oklahoma. Jonna Polk, Field Supervisor

Bouchardina robisoni. Bayou Bodcau Crayfish. out of 100. Distribution. Ecoregions where the species occurs: Malacostraca Decapoda Cambaridae

Bouchardina robisoni. Bayou Bodcau Crayfish. out of 100. Distribution. Ecoregions where the species occurs: Malacostraca Decapoda Cambaridae

Tim Lane Southwest Virginia Mussel Recovery Coordinator Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries

Field Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Minnesota. Bernard E. Sietman

FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT

Summary of Previous and New Records of the Arkansas Darter (Etheostoma cragini) in Arkansas

ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

[FWS R4 ES 2017 N043; FXES FF04E00000] ACTION: Notice of receipt of permit applications; request for comment.

Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program

Freshwater Mussel Propagation and Culture 2014

Steelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project

Got Mussels? Freshwater Mussel Volunteer Survey Program

Report prepared for: Prepared by: January 2002 BEAK Ref

PUBLIC NOTICE ANNOUNCING ARKANSAS REGIONAL CONDITIONS FOR THE REISSUANCE OF THE NATIONWIDE PERMITS

STREAM SURVEYS RESULTS FOR THE GRAVEL CHUB (ERIMYSTAX X-PUNCTATUS), SLENDER MADTOM (NOTURUS EXILIS), AND BLUNTNOSE DARTER (ETHEOSTOMA CHLOROSOMUM)

Full Project Proposal

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Watershed Restoration Plan for the Hiwassee River Basin

SPECIES FACT SHEET. Common Name: Siuslaw Sand Tiger Beetle or Siuslaw Hairy-necked Tiger Beetle

The Mussel Fauna of the Glover River, Oklahoma

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

PROJECT TO INSTALL LARGE WOOD HABITAT STRUCTURES IN THE CARMEL RIVER USING CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME GRANT FUNDS

Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Annual Report Fiscal Year 06: July 1, 2005 June 30, 2006

Illinois Lake Management Association Conference March 23, 2018 By Trent Thomas Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries

San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Watershed Management Plan, Final Version Part I: Existing Conditions Report

Wildlife Introduction


NOTES RANGE EXTENSION AND STATUS UPDATE FOR THE OKLAHOMA CAVE CRAYFISH, CAMBARUS TARTARUS (DECAPODA: CAMBARIDAE)

Should you have any questions, please contact the communicating author at Sincerely yours, Megan Brown

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Field Notes Summer 2010 Welcome

FRESHWATER MUSSELS. Master Naturalist Program September 27, 2016

Acipenser fulvescens. Lake Sturgeon. out of 100. Distribution. Ecoregions where the species occurs: Actinopterygii Acipenseriformes Acipenseridae

October 5, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Enhancing and Conserving Pennsylvania s Diverse Natural Resources for Future Generations

Update on Mussel Restoration Efforts in the Clinch and Powell Rivers. Clinch-Powell Clean Rivers Initiative, St. Paul, VA September,

Nechako white sturgeon are an Endangered Species

Florida panther conservation challenges. Darrell Land, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

DELAWARE WILDLIFE JUDGING LEADER S GUIDE 2018

Restoring the Kootenai: A Tribal Approach to Restoration of a Large River in Idaho

October 12, Mr. Angel Correa Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration 700 West Capitol, Room 3130 Little Rock, Arkansas

The Value of Springs to The Petersen Ranch

ARkAnsAs tennessee Primary Partner: Primary Partner: Habitat Work: Habitat Work:

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture. Update

TESTIMONY OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY TRIBES BEFORE PACIFIC FISHERIES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL

A Status Survey of Freshwater Mussel Populations in the Upper Clinch River, Tazewell County, Virginia

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, invite the public to comment on the

ARKANSAS RIVER, LAKE FORK

BASS LAKE PLANNING UNIT Willow Creek Watershed

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Transforming Chadwick Lake

Klickitat County Shoreline Master Program Update. Open House March 15, 2017

Cross-Vane Plan View FIN-UP Habitat Consultants, Inc. 220 Illinois Avenue Manitou Springs, CO (719) P.

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Three Mile Creek 2011

Alasmidonta marginata

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Tips for Using & Printing Spreadsheets

Allegheny Parker. Credit: Timothy Wertz, PFBC

Blue-tipped Dancer. Summary. Protection Not listed in New York State, not listed federally.

Brook Trout in Massachusetts: A Troubled History, A Hopeful Future

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

What is a River Basin Restoration Priority? 1. Criteria for Selecting a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 2. Hiwassee River Basin Overview 3

Penns Creek, Section 05 Fishery Update and Regulation Review

Freshwater Mussel Surveys of the Big Darby Creek System in Central Ohio G. THOMAS WATTERS

2012 Bring Back the Natives Awarded Projects

Elkhorn Creek Westslope Cutthroat Restoration Efforts

Northern Clustered Sedge

APPENDIX A-4 SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FRESHWATER MUSSEL ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013

Chapter 635 Division 44 Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission January 20, 2017 Salem, Oregon

Rehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011.

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

Illinois State Water Survey

1.Mill Creek Watershed Summary Description and Land Use

Fish and Mussel Surveys in Hudson Mills Metropark, Huron River

Outline. 1. Overview 2. Population 3. Flooding 4. Land Use 5. References. Overview

Casey Cox, Intern, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Arkansas Field Office, Conway, AR Phone:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Stream Habitat Improvement Projects

Freshwater Mussels of the Mackinaw River

The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank

Black Sturgeon Regional Plan

Frequently Asked Questions About Revised Critical Habitat and Economic Analysis for the Endangered Arroyo Toad

SALAMANDERS, MUDPUPPY AND NEWT OF WISCONSIN

FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DUFFINS CREEK AND CARRUTHERS CREEK JUNE, 2004

PROTECTED WILDLIFE, HOLDING AND PROPAGATING RULES

2004 ANNUAL REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Section 2: Biodiversity at Risk

Pre-Visit Lesson Endangered Species On the Brink of Recovery

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

ESA, Proposed Threatened ESA, Threatened New Mexico-WCA, Endangered

3. The qualification raised by the ISRP is addressed in #2 above and in the work area submittal and review by the ISRP as addressed in #1.

Trip Report: Eagle Creek, Arizona

Executive Summary. Map 1. The Santa Clara River watershed with topography.

2018 New Hampshire Envirothon: Fish and Wildlife Test. 1. barred owl 13. Canada lynx. 2. bobolink 14. porcupine. 3. spring peeper 15.

Example Applications

River Restoration: Culvers Island weir removals and river naturalisation project.

ALABAMA WILDLIFE -VOLUME 2~ Imperiled Aquatic Mollusks and Fishes RALPH E. MIRARCHI JEFFREY T. GARNER MAURICE F. (SCOTT) METTEE PATRICK E.

Transcription:

Appendix A Figures Proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Bank Areas

A-1 Figure 1 Location of the proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Banking Sites in relation to Illinois River and Osage Creek watersheds

Figure 2 Location of proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Banks Areas 1, 2, and 3 in relation to the regional area and local vicinity A-2

Figure 3 Overview of the proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Bank Area 1 A-3

A-4 Figure 4 Overview of the proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Bank Areas 2, 3A and 3B

Figure 5 Soils map for Area 1 A-5

A-6 Figure 6 Soils map for Area 2

A-7 Figure 7 Soils map for Areas 3A and 3B

A-8 Figure 8 Proposed conservation actions for Area 1

A-9 Figure 9 Proposed conservation actions for Area 2

A-10 Figure 10 Proposed conservation actions for Areas 3A and 3B

A-11 Figure 11 Proposed service areas for the Osage Creek Mitigation Bank

Appendix B Site Photographs Proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Bank Areas

B-1 Figure 1 Index of areas depicted in site photographs for Area 1

B-2 Figure 2 Index of areas depicted in site photographs for Area 2

B-3 Figure 3 Index of areas depicted in site photographs for Areas 3A and 3B

Photo 1 Area 1 looking north from Old Highway 68 Photo 2 Area 1 looking west toward typical near-channel vegetative community near stable sections of the river that will be preserved B-4

Photo 3 Area 1 looking downstream toward a riverbank that will be restored Photo 4 Area 1 looking towards the west from alluvial terrace towards Osage Creek B-5

Photo 5 Area 1 looking downstream toward a riverbank that will be restored Photo 6 Area 1 looking downstream B-6

Photo 7 Area 1 looking upstream Photo 8 Area 1 looking downstream toward a riverbank that will be restored B-7

Photo 9 Area 1 eroding streambank located along upstream portion of the site Photo 10 Eroding streambank in Area 2 that will be restored B-8

Photo 11 Eroding streambank in Area 2 that will be restored Photo 12 Area 2 looking northeast toward a forested riparian area B-9

Photo 13 Moderate streambank instability that would be addressed at Area 2 Photo 14 Intermediate bench naturally present along river channel, riparian area will be enhanced at Area 2 B-10

Photo 15 Looking northwest toward an eroding streambank in Area 2 Photo 16 Area 2 looking north toward an eroding streambank in Area 2 B-11

Photo 16 Area 2 looking north toward an eroding streambank that will be restored Photo 17 Looking south toward an eroding streambank and riparian in Area 3A that will be restored Photo 18 Area 3A looking south toward an eroding streambank and riparian that will be restored B-12

Photo 19 Eroding streambank in Area 3A that will be restored Photo 20 Eroding streambank in Area 3A that will be restored B-13

Photo 21 Eroding streambank and riparian in Area 3A that will be restored Photo 21 Incised stream channel with bankfull scour lines B-14

Photo 22 Looking south toward an eroding streambank and riparian in Area 3B that will be restored Photo 23 Looking south toward an eroding streambank and riparian in Area 3B that will be restored Photo 24 Looking downstream toward an eroding streambank in Area 3B that will be restored B-15

Photo 25 Area 3B looking downstream toward a severely eroding streambank with no riparian Photo 26 Area 3B looking downstream toward a severely eroding streambank with no riparian B-16

Appendix C Tables Proposed Osage Creek Mitigation Bank Sites

Species of Greatest Conservation Needed in Osage Creek Watershed Name Common Name Federally Listed Global Ranking State Ranking Ecoregions Vertebrates Etheostoma mihileze Sunburst darter - GNR S3 - Nocomis asper Resdspot chub - G4 S2 - Table A. SGCN recorded near mitigation site in the Osage Creek Watershed (10-digit HUC=1111010303) C-1

SGCN in Illinois Watershed near Mitigation Site Scientific Name Animals-Invertebrates Common Name Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Alasmidonta marginata elktoe - INV G4 S3 Caecidotea macropropoda bat cave isopod - INV G2G3 S2 Caecidotea stiladactyla an isopod - INV G3G4 S3 Cambarus aculabrum a crayfish LE SE G1 S1 Hesperochernes occidentalis a pseudoscorpion - INV G5 S1 Lampsilis rafinesqueana Neosho mucket C SE G2 S1 Lampsilis siliquoidea fatmucket - INV G5 S3 Lasmigona costata flutedshell - INV G5 S3 Ptychobranchus occidentalis Ouachita - INV G3G4 S3 kidneyshell Quadrula cylindrica cylindrica rabbitsfoot C SE G3G4T3 S2 Stygobromus onondagaensis an amphipod - INV G3 S1? Stygobromus ozarkensis Ozark cave - INV G4 S2 amphipod Trigenotyla parca a cave obligate - INV G1G2 S1 millipede Venustaconcha ellipsiformis ellipse - INV G4 S1 Villosa iris rainbow - INV G5Q S2S3 Villosa lienosa little - INV G5 S3 spectaclecase Amblyopsis rosae Ozark cavefish LT SE G3 S1 Etheostoma cragini Arkansas darter C SE G3G4 S1 Eurycea spelaea grotto salamander - INV G4 S3 C-2

Eurycea tynerensis Oklahoma - INV G3 S3 salamander Myotis grisescens gray myotis LE SE G3 S2S3 Nocomis asper redspot chub - INV G4 S2? Percina phoxocephala slenderhead - INV G5 S2 darter Asclepias incarnata ssp. swamp milkweed - INV G5T5 S2 incarnata Carex aggregata cluster sedge - INV G5 S1 Carex conjuncta soft fox sedge - INV G4G5 S1 Caulophyllum thalictroides blue cohosh - INV G4G5 S2 Diphasiastrum digitatum Heuchera villosa var. arkansana southern runningpine Arkansas alumroot Table B. SGCN near mitigation site in the Illinois Watershed (HUC = 11110103) - INV G5 S1S2 - INV G5T3Q S3 C-3

Scientific Name Animals-Invertebrates Species of Greatest Conservation Needed in Osage Creek Federal Common Name State Status Status Global Rank State Rank Caecidotea stiladactyla an isopod - INV G3G4 S3 Cambarus aculabrum a crayfish LE SE G1 S1 Hesperochernes occidentalis a pseudoscorpion - INV G5 S1 Heterosternuta sulphuria Sulphur Springs diving - INV G1? S1? beetle Ligidium elrodii an isopod - INV G4G5 S2 Orconectes meeki brevis a crayfish - INV G4T3 S2 Orconectes nana a crayfish - INV G3 S3 Stygobromus onondagaensis an amphipod - INV G3 S1? Stygobromus ozarkensis Ozark cave amphipod - INV G4 S2 Trigenotyla parca Animals-Vertebrates a cave obligate millipede - INV G1G2 S1 Amblyopsis rosae Ozark cavefish LT SE G3 S1 Ambystoma annulatum ringed salamander - INV G4 S3 Ambystoma tigrinum eastern tiger - INV G5T5 S3 tigrinum salamander Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron - MON G5 S3B,S4N Etheostoma cragini Arkansas darter C SE G3G4 S1 Etheostoma microperca least darter - INV G5 S1 Etheostoma mihileze sunburst darter - INV GNR S3 Eurycea spelaea grotto salamander - INV G4 S3 C-4

Eurycea tynerensis Oklahoma salamander - INV G3 S3 Myotis grisescens gray myotis LE SE G3 S2S3 Nocomis asper redspot chub - INV G4 S2? Thryomanes bewickii Bewick's Wren - INV G5 S2B,S3N Plants-Vascular Asclepias incarnata ssp. swamp milkweed - INV G5T5 S2 incarnata Calopogon oklahomensis Oklahoma grass-pink - INV G3 S2 Carex aggregata cluster sedge - INV G5 S1 Carex buxbaumii brown bog sedge - INV G5 S1 Carex conjuncta soft fox sedge - INV G4G5 S1 Carex conoidea open-field sedge - INV G5 S1 Carex opaca opaque prairie sedge - SE G4 S2S3 Carex scoparia var. scoparia pointed broom sedge - INV G5T5 S1S2 Eleocharis wolfii Wolf's spike-rush - INV G3G4 S3 Erysimum capitatum var. western wallflower - INV G5T5 S2 capitatum Koeleria macrantha prairie June grass - INV G5 S2 Scleria muehlenbergii Muhlenberg's nutrush - INV G5 S1S2 Trillium ozarkanum Ozark trillium - INV G3 S3 Utricularia subulata zigzag bladderwort - INV G5 S2 Table C. SGCN in the Osage Creek Watershed (10-digit HUC=1111010303) C-5

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 GH GU GX T- RANK S GNR Global Rank Codes Critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity (5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extinction. Imperiled globally because of rarity (6-20 occurrences or few remaining individuals or acres) or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extinction. Either very rare and local throughout its range or found locally (even abundantly at some of its locations) in a restricted range (e.g., a single western state, a physiographic region in the East) or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extinction throughout its range; in terms of occurrences, in the range of 21-100. Apparently secure globally, though it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especially at the periphery. Demonstrably secure globally, though it may be quite rare in parts of its range, especially at the periphery. Of historical occurrence throughout its range, i.e., formerly part of the established biota, with the expectation that it may be rediscovered (e.g., Bachman's Warbler). Possibly in peril range-wide but status uncertain; more information is needed. Believed to be extinct throughout range (e.g., Passenger Pigeon) with virtually no likelihood that it will be rediscovered. T subranks are given to global ranks when a subspecies, variety, or race is considered at the state level. The subrank is made up of a "T" plus a number or letter (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, H, U, X) with the same ranking rules as a full species. Not yet ranked. Table D. Global ranking codes for conservation status State Rank Codes S1 Extremely rare. Typically 5 or fewer estimated occurrences in the state, or only a few remaining individuals, may be especially vulnerable to extirpation. S2 Very rare. Typically between 5 and 20 estimated occurrences or with many individuals in fewer occurrences, often susceptible to becoming extirpated. S3 Rare to uncommon. Typically between 20 and 100 estimated occurrences, may have fewer occurrences but with large number of individuals in some populations, may be susceptible to large-scale disturbances. S4 Common, apparently secure under present conditions. Typically 100 or more estimated occurrences, but may be fewer with many large populations, may be restricted to only a portion of the state, usually not susceptible to immediate threats. SH Historically known from the state, but not verified for an extended period, usually 15 years. SX Apparently extirpated from state. SNR Not yet ranked. Table E. State ranking codes for conservation status C-6