Auckland Transport Code of Practice 2013

Similar documents
Review of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Policy Statement. Objective. Context. References and Supporting Documentation

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

(This page left intentionally blank)

11 CHECKLISTS Master Checklists All Stages CHECKLIST 1 FEASIBILITY STAGE AUDIT

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

Part B Design Guidance / Principles _

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

6. BREENS/GARDINERS/HAREWOOD INTERSECTION - SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS

CHECKLIST 6: EXISTING ROADS: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

Table of Contents. Introduction. Prompt List Arterials and Streets. Prompt List Interchange. Prompt List Intersections. Prompt List Limited Access

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

To position power poles a safe distance from the road to minimise the likelihood of being accidentally hit by vehicles.

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Geometric Design Tables

RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING CHECKLIST Road Safety Review of Railway Crossings

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

The Safe System Approach

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

Who is Toole Design Group?

Proven Safety Countermeasures. FHWA Office of Safety January 12, :00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

H8 Signs, Supports and Poles

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

General Design Factors

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

TGSI Tactile Ground Surface Indicators

Traffic Signs and Markings. Instructor: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Associate Prof. Of Transportation

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Safety Barrier System Acceptance Conditions SMART Steel Crash Cushion

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

A5.1 Permitted activities

Memorandum. Exhibit 60 SSDP To: Jenny Bailey, Senior Planner. From: Bill Schultheiss, P.E. (WA. P.E. #46108) Date: June 20, 2017

4. TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Quality Assurance Statement. Prepared by: Glen Koorey. Reviewed by: Axel Wilke. Project Number: Version: 1

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Shared Use Path Design

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Roadway Design Manual

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

Interim Report on the Development of Road Safety Infrastructure Facility Design Standard for the Asian Highway Network

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Guidelines for flush medians RTS 4

The 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide: An Overview

SMART STEEL CRASH CUSHION

Development of the Technical Standard on the Road Safety Facility For the Asian Highway Networks

Traffic Management Guidelines for Structure Rehabilitation Projects

Part 8: Roading. Contents. Part 8: Roading. Christchurch City Council Infrastructure Design Standard 8-1

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

PEDESTRIAN FENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 30

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

PART 5. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW-VOLUME ROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

CYCLING TIME TRIALS The national governing body for CYCLING time trials

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

Roadway Departure Focus State Initiative Roadside Safety Systems Inspection, Maintenance & Designers Mentoring Program

Roadway Design Manual

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Design and Installation of Low Level Cycle Signals

ENGINEERING STANDARD FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF ROADS AND STREETS ORIGINAL EDITION MAR. 1996

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Classification 2

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew

CHECKLIST 4: PRE-OPENING STAGE AUDIT

Grade-separation for cyclists includes cycling bridges and cycling tunnels, specially built for cyclists and possibly co-used by pedestrians.

SECTION 5 DELINEATION AND HAZARD MARKERS

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

SCHEME DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

Zlatko Krstulich, P.Eng. City of O9awa

CHECKLIST 5: ROADWORK TRAFFIC SCHEME AUDIT

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Site Improvements

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

Designing with the Railroad

DRAFT OPERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC ROADS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA DRAFT VERSION 2

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

Transcription:

P age 234

9 Roadside Restraint Devices 9.1 Scope This chapter includes the following: Road Safety Barrier Systems Fences Railings Bollards Sight Rails It excludes: Fences and restraints required within Parks and Recreational areas Restraints not within the road reserve Where requirements within this document differ from existing standards or guidelines, the requirements of this document shall apply. All references to reports, documents, standards, guidelines, acts and regulations in this standard are references to the latest versions complete with all amendments. 9.2 Road Safety Barrier Systems The main purpose of roadside barriers is to improve the safety of people. It serves to reduce the severity of crashes by dissipating the kinetic energy of errant vehicles. Barriers, however, in themselves pose a hazard and the provision thereof needs to be balanced between the safety benefits they provide as opposed to the safety hazards they create. The design of road safety barrier systems must be compliant with crash tested design or approved under Section 3: Approval of Road Safety Barrier Systems of NZTA standards for road safety. Changes to the crash tested, approved design configuration will render the barrier system non-compliant with the specification. All road barrier systems must be installed and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer s instructions. AT requires Consultants and Contractors carrying out design and/or supervision work involving road safety barriers to have attained the Barrier Installation and Maintenance Inspections Qualification (BIMIQ) by having attended the practical workshop and having attained competence through a practical assessment. Timber faced guardrail barriers are not pre-approved by Auckland Transport (AT), but AT will consider them on a case-by-case basis depending on the context of their proposed application. Approval for their use must be obtained from the AT Road Corridor Operations Manager. P age 235

Road safety barrier systems must be designed and installed in accordance with the following: NZTA Geometric Design Manual, Section 7- Roadside Features NZTA Bridge Design Manual, Section B Bridge Side Protection, June 2004 NZTA, M23 Specifications for Road Barrier Systems NZTA, M23 Notes on Specifications NZTA, M23A Approved Road Safety Barrier Systems NZTA Maintenance Specification 17: Barrier Repairs NZTA, RTS 11 Urban Roadside Barriers and Alternative Treatments AS/NZS 3845:1999 Road Safety Barrier Systems NCHRP Report 350 Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board National Research Council, 1993 AUSTROADS Guide to Road Safety AASHTO Roadside Design Guide, 4 th Edition 2011 The requirements of the road safety barrier (including end treatments/crash cushions etc.) Manufacturer s installation and maintenance instructions 9.3 Fences The terms fences and railings are sometimes used interchangeably. For the purposes of ATCOP, there is a difference as described in sections 9.3 and 9.4. Importantly, fences are road restraint devices but railings are not. Fences along and within road reserves are used to control entry to road reserves or crossing of roadways by vehicles, cyclists or pedestrians. They are also used to safeguard people from injury caused by falling. In this context, such fences are often referred to as barriers (Clause F4 Safety from Falling- New Zealand Building Code (NZBC) ). A further use is to provide security and to restrict access to specific areas. Simply put, fences comprise posts (vertical), supporting rails (horizontal) and a secure infill material between ground (or floor) and the uppermost rail. The nature and form of the infill material is a function of the primary purpose of the fence. For example, security and fall prevention fences must have an infill which is non-penetrable and non-climbable so that people cannot reasonably pass through it or climb over it. Fences for fall prevention have specific compliance criteria as described below. Fences solely for the prevention of vehicle access may have a different form of infill one which can withstand reasonable vehicle impacts. Fences normally provide most of the functionality of railings but generally the converse is not so. The differentiating feature of fences is the characteristic detailing to safeguard people from injury caused by falling, to prevent vehicle access, and to provide robust security. Railings do P age 236

not usually have adequate fall prevention capability, vehicle access prevention features or adequate security characteristics. Fences can themselves present safety hazards e.g. when impacted by vehicles or cyclists. Therefore fences should only be erected with a clear purpose and when the safety benefits outweigh any safety downsides. Fences should be designed so as not to constitute a hazard for road users. Horizontal rails that could spear or snag vehicles, non-frangible or large posts, and fencing materials that could yield hazardous debris (e.g. splintered wood fragments) must not be used. Where fences are installed alongside the edge of a carriageway and in the vicinity of a pedestrian crossing, then the fence must not obscure motorists visibility of pedestrians as they move toward and access the pedestrian crossing. The style of fencing selected must be closely aligned with the urban design and landscape requirements of the surrounding area. It should also be of a type that will minimise the risk of graffiti damage refer to ATCOP Chapter 6 Street Amenities. The provision of fences should take into account the principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). Fences must comply with the following: Clause F4 Safety from Falling New Zealand Building Code (NZBC). NZTA Bridge Manual Section B: Bridge Side Protection (in particular Clause B6.3 Pedestrian and Cycle Barrier). Fences must be designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with the following general requirements: Where a pedestrian facility is at a height above ground of 1m or greater, then a fence ( barrier in NZBC terminology) must be installed in compliance with Clause F4, NZBC. For pedestrians the fence height must be at least 1100mm. Where cyclists may use a path on a bridge and the bridge height above ground is greater than 2m, then a bridge fence ( barrier in NZTA Bridge Manual terminology) must be installed in compliance with Section B of the NZTA Bridge Manual. The fence height must be at least 1400mm. New fences must comply with standard drawings as follows (or like for like in the case of isolated repairs/replacements to existing fences): PLAN No. RR001 Fence Types A & B PLAN No. RR002 Fence Type D P age 237

PLAN No. RR003 Fence Type E PLAN No. RR004 Fence Type F PLAN No. RR005 Fence Type G Part One of Three PLAN No. RR006 Fence Type G Part Two of Three PLAN No. RR007 Fence Type G Part Three of Three PLAN No. RR008 Typical Picket Fence Detail PLAN No. RR009 Typical Wire Fence Detail A PLAN No. RR010 Typical Wire Fence Detail B 9.4 Railings Simply put, railings have a typical form comprising posts (vertical) and rails (horizontal) but no infill material. For ATCOP, railings are not classified as a road restraint device. They generally provide support for people movement assistance and/or directional guidance. The spacing of both posts and rails is usually of a composition to deter people movement through the railing but is not sufficient to provide fall prevention. Railings are used to provide support to, or assist the movement of a person e.g. cycle hold rails. They may also be used to guide pedestrians to more desirable routes or crossing points or entry/exit points, contain people for safety reasons in situations where people are not exposed to a potential fall of greater than 1m. (Where people could fall 1m or more, then fences ( barriers in NZBC terminology) must be installed. (Refer to above)). For example, railings to control approach speeds of cyclists before an at-grade rail crossing, railings to contain pedestrians on a pedestrian refuge island. They must not be used as a fall prevention device. Handrails on bridges, parapets on bridges and elevated structures, handrails along retaining walls, handrails on stairs, handrails on elevated walkways are not fences, but their primary purposes are to prevent falls and provide assistance for the safe movement of people. All such handrails must comply with Clause D1 Handrails on Stairs New Zealand Building Code (NZBC) and ATCOP Chapter 16 Structures (in particular handrails/parapets on bridges and other structures). Pedestrian Railings are covered in ATCOP Chapter 12 Footpaths and Pedestrian Facilities. Cycle Railings are covered in ATCOP Chapter 13 Cycling Infrastructure Design. 9.5 Bollards The function of bollards is generally to control vehicular access. The design of bollards is closely linked to urban design guidelines. Refer to ATCOP Chapter 6 - Streetscape Amenities. For bollards on cycle paths or shared pedestrian cycle paths, refer to ATCOP Chapter 13 Cycle Infrastructure Design. P age 238

9.6 Sight Rails Sight rails are sometimes mistakenly considered to be some form of road restraint. Sight rails do not form part of any approved roadside safety barrier system (refer to section 9.2 above), and must not be used as such. Sight rails can address crashes such as vehicle collisions with roadside objects, loss of control and over-shooting intersections. Sight rails have been used to highlight hazards such as curves, bridges, culverts and intersections. They are usually constructed of light timber and are painted white. The use of sight rails to protect dangerous roadside hazards such as bridge abutments and steep banks is not an acceptable practice. In such instances, the provisions of ATCOP section 9.2 Roadside Safety Barrier Systems, must be applied. It is considered that, in most situations, the use of correctly installed conventional delineation devices as explained in NZTA, RTS 5-Guidelines for Rural Road Marking and Delineation (reprint 2002), would make the use of sight rails unnecessary. Also, refer to ATCOP Chapter 10 Traffic Signs and Road Markings. For those situations where sight rails are the solution of last resort, they must be designed, constructed and maintained in compliance with NZTA, RTS 5 (reprint 2002). P age 239