Introduction to Transportation Engineering. Discussion of Stopping and Passing Distances

Similar documents
Introduction to Transportation Engineering. Discussion of Stopping and Passing Distances

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES. Figure Title

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

LECTUR 10 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DRIVER, THE PEDESTRIAN, THE VEHICLE AND THE ROAD. One problem that faces traffic and transportation engineers is:

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES

Design Considerations for Complete Streets. The Kiewit Center for Infrastructure and Transportation

Sight Distance. The availability of sufficient sight distance for the driver to see ahead is critical to the design of a safe highway.

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

SIGHT DISTANCE GUIDELINES

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Geometric designs for Safe Highways. Dr. Manoj M. Asst. Professor Department of Civil Engineering IIT Delhi

GUIDELINES FOR USING DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE AT IGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS NEAR VERTICAL CURVES

TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS. Unit I

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY NOTE 608A. Spacing for Commercial Drives and Streets. To Promote a Uniform Practice in Determining Access Spacing

The Influence of Human Factors on Access Management Design

Unit 7 Speed, Travel Time and Delay Studies

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Highway geometric design QUESTION PAPER

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Visibility Research and the Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems

Subject: Use of Pull-off Areas in Work Zones Page: 1 of 13. Brief Description: Guidance for the use and placement of pull-off area in work zones.

7 DESIGN CRITER RIA 7.1 Design Space Requirements

Chapter 5 5. INTERSECTIONS 5.1. INTRODUCTION

Chapter Capacity and LOS Analysis of a Signalized I/S Overview Methodology Scope Limitation

Montana Teen Driver Education and Training. Module 3.3. Mixing with Traffic. Montana Teen Driver Curriculum

Road Safety Assessment

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Issues Relating to the Geometric Design of Intersections Vergil G. Stover

200 Horizontal and Vertical Design. Table of Contents

Transportation Advisory Board

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines

Driver Training School Instructor Curriculum Requirements for Student Learning & Performance Goals

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESTRICTING PARKING ADJACENT TO 170 AND 171 BRISCO ROAD

SUBJECT: Chapters 2 and 3 (Sight Distance), 5, and 8 (Drainage Structures and Castings)

Roadway Vertical Alignments

Interchange Access Management

NCHRP Superelevation Criteria for Sharp Horizontal Curves on Steep Grades. Research Team: MRIGlobal Pennsylvania State University

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

Roadway Design Manual

KDOT Access Management Policy (AMP)

Safe Stopping Distance at Two- Way Stop Intersections

Evaluating Roundabout Capacity, Level of Service and Performance

A Study on the Widths Design of Highway Roadside Clear Zone by Considering Multi-Factors

Roadway Horizontal Alignment Design

Geometric Design, Speed, and Safety

Roadway Vertical Alignments

Significant Changes to California's Yellow Signal Timing Protocols

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

BTW Lesson 5. Traffic Flow

GUIDELINES FOR EMERGENCY TRAFFIC CONTROL

Human Factors for Limited-Ability Autonomous Driving Systems

Module 5: Navigating Roadways

GRADE CROSSINGS STANDARDS. July, 2014

Roadway Horizontal Alignment

Characteristics of. Entering & Exiting High Speed Considerations

Determining Minimum Sightlines at Grade Crossings: A Guide for Road Authorities and Railway Companies

Everyday Hazards for School Bus Drivers. Reference Guide and Test

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Preventing Rear End Collisions. OSACH Safety Group Meeting April 16, 2009

DRIVING ON EXPRESSWAYS/ INTERSTATE CHAPTER 11

Pedestrian and Driver Distraction: Overview & NHTSA Prevalence and Risk Study. Heidi Coleman, NHTSA Bob Scopatz, VHB

Chapter 11 Motion. Displacement-. Always includes Shorter than distance

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Texas Driver Education Classroom and In-car Instruction Model Curriculum

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

Yellow and Red Intervals It s Just a Matter of Time. 58 th Annual Alabama Transportation Conference February 9, 2015

EFFICIENCY OF TRIPLE LEFT-TURN LANES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Figure 1. Results of the Application of Blob Entering Detection Techniques.

Driver Response to Phase Termination at Signalized Intersections at Signalized Intersections: Are Driving Simulator Results Valid?

Crash Facts Scenario 1 Pedestrian Accident - Solution - May 2006

Transportation Knowledge

By Kay Fitzpatrick, Ph.D., P.E., Ann Do, P.E., and Bruce Friedman, P.E.

Situations that a B2/ALKS highway system may encounter

Turn Lane Warrants: Concepts, Standards, Application in Review

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

TRAFFIC ACCIDENT STUDY GUIDE 2003

Background on the Revisions to VDOT s Access Management Spacing Standards

Understanding the highway and traffic system to drive safely. Gopinath Menon Vice-Chairman, Singapore Road Safety Council

DELAY, STOP AND QUEUE ESTIMATION FOR UNIFORM AND RANDOM TRAFFIC ARRIVALS AT FIXED-TIME SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

Township Signing Practices

Traffic Control Devices

CAPACITY, LEVEL OF SERVICE, FUNDAMENTALS OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

JUNE, 2000 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 5-0(1) CHAPTER 5 AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS

Analysis of Unsignalized Intersection

Probabilistic Models for Pedestrian Capacity and Delay at Roundabouts

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

unsignalized signalized isolated coordinated Intersections roundabouts Highway Capacity Manual level of service control delay

Access Management Benefits & Techniques. Access Management Workshop June 2, 2006

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Basic Freeways and Multilane Highways (LOS) CIVL 4162/6162

RAMP CROSSWALK TREATMENT FOR SAN DIEGO AIRPORT, TERMINAL ONE

ACCESS CONTROL DESIGN ON HIGHWAY INTERCHANGES

BICYCLE LEVEL OF SERVICE for URBAN STREETS. Prepared by Ben Matters and Mike Cechvala. 4/16/14 Page 1

OBJECTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY OF PERCEIVED SAFETY & COMFORT DURING ASSISTED DRIVING

A Novel Approach to Evaluate Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings using Trajectory Data

Transcription:

Introduction to Transportation Engineering Discussion of Stopping and Passing Distances Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia Fall, Spring 2009 Virginia Tech 1

Introductory Remarks The presentation of the materials that follow are taken from the American Association of State and Highway Officials (AASHTO): A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets - 2004 This text is the standard material used by transportation engineering to design highways and streets Virginia Tech 2

Driver Performance The human-machine system The driver Perception and reaction Vehicle kinematic equations Acceleration and deceleration problems Stopping distance criteria Passing sight distance criteria Examples Virginia Tech 3

Human Machine Systems Complex human-machine behavior in transportation engineering Some examples: Air traffic controllers interacting with pilots who in turn control aircraft Highway drivers maneuvering at high speeds in moderate congestion and bad weather A train engineer following train control signals at a busy train depot Virginia Tech 4

Sample Problem Driving behavioral models are perhaps the easiest to understand Driver Strategy: control, guidance, and navigation Virginia Tech 5

The Driver Transportation engineers deal with large numbers of drivers Elderly Middle age Young Handicapped, etc. Design standards cannot be predicated on the basis of the average driver In-class discussion Example of reaction time study Virginia Tech 6

Anecdotal Experience About Drivers Drivers do not like more than 0.3 g of lateral acceleration at low speeds (< 30 m.p.h.) No more than 0.1 g at 60 m.p.h. Human factor issues in highway design: a) As speed increases so does visual concentration b) As speed increases, the focus of visual concentration changes (600 ft. at 25 m.p.h., 2000 ft. at 65 m.p.h.) c) As speed increases, peripheral vision is reduced (100 deg. At 25 m.p.h., 40 at 60 m.p.h.) d) As speed increases, foreground details fade (large shapes meaningful at high speeds) e) As speed increases, space perception is impaired Virginia Tech 7

Visual Acuity Ability to distinguish details clearly Varies from person to person Affected by the speed of the objects passing by Affected by weather and environmental conditions (i.e., day acuity is better than nighttime acuity) A person with 20/20 vision can read letters one inch in height at 60 ft. (or 1/3 inch at 20 ft.) A person with 20/40 vision can read the same one inch letters at only 30 ft. Virginia Tech 8

Design Speed While designing highways and other transportation systems we use the concept of design speed Design speed is the speed used to establish the geometric features of the roadway or guideway (in case of trains) Design speed features: a) As high as practically possible (except for local streets) b) Should be higher than the typical operating speeds of the roadway or guideway c) Consistent with the speed users are expect from the facility Virginia Tech 9

Highway Design Speed Equivalents (AASHTO 2004) Design Speed (km/hr) Design Speed (m.p.h.) 20 15 30 20 40 25 50 30 60 40 70 45 80 50 90 55 100 60 110 70 120 75 130 80 Virginia Tech 10

Perception: Perception and Reaction a) Process of extracting information from the surrounding environment b) Too much information can easily overload a human controller (driver, pilot, controller) c) Drivers and pilots can only perceive small amounts of bits/ second of information Secondary tasks or activities are very dangerous and distracting (driving and using a cell phone) a) Value for perception time used in highway design is 2.5 seconds b) Accounts for the worse case scenario (a distracted driver) Virginia Tech 11

Perception and Reaction Times Car Obstacle Virginia Tech 12

Sight Distance Considerations The ability of an operator to see ahead Critical in the design of transportation facilities (highways, railways, etc.) For highways two types of analyses are critical: a) stopping sight distance b) passing sight distance Each technique applies in diverse conditions Virginia Tech 13

Stopping Sight Distance Two distance components are important to calculate Sight Stopping Distance (SSD): Reaction distance Distance traversed while the driver makes a decision to perceive, identify and react to an unexpected situation Braking distance Distance traversed in the physical activity of braking a vehicle Virginia Tech 14

Stopping Sight Distance Formulas Braking Distance d b = 2 V ----- d 2a (1) V d where: is the design speed (m/s), is the vehicle d b acceleration (m/s 2 ) and is the braking distance (m). a Reaction Distance d r = V d t r (2) t r where: is the reaction time (s) and is the reaction distance (m). d r Virginia Tech 15

Stopping Distance Formulas Add two components to get, Sight Stopping Distance d SSD = 2 V ----- d + V d t r 2a (3) This estimates the total sight stopping distance of the vehicle. Virginia Tech 16

Design Values In practical situations the following design values are recommended by ASHTO a = 3.4 m/s 2 (11.2 ft./s 2 ) t r = 2.5 seconds Driver s eye position = 1,080 mm (3.5 ft.) Height of the critical object = 600 mm (2.0 ft.) A table showing the recommended AASHTO stopping distances is shown in the following page. Virginia Tech 17

Stopping Sight Distance Table source: Table 3.1 in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO 2004, pp.112. Virginia Tech 18

Stopping Sight Distance on Grades Grades affect stopping distance due to the gravitational force acting in favor (downhill) or opposing (uphill) the motion of a vehicle. ASSHTO recommends the following formula to adjust the braking distance for grade conditions, d b = 2 V d ---------------------------------------- a 254 --------- + G 9.81 (4) Virginia Tech 19

G In this equation is the percent of grade divided by 100. Also, this equation requires V d be expressed in km/hr and the deceleration rate in m/s 2. a A table showing corrected braking distances by grade is shown in the table in the following page. Virginia Tech 20

Stopping Sight Distance on Grades (AASHTO Table) source: Table 3.1 in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO 2004, pp.115. Virginia Tech 21

Exercise for Home Derive equation (4) using the following free body diagram. F f +/- mg sin(θ)= ma F f = mg cos(θ) f (V f ) 2 = (V o ) 2 +2 ad θ V f = final speed V o = initial speed W = mg F f = friction force (braking) f = equivalent coefficient of friction (dimensionless) a = vehicle acceleration/deceleration d= distance traveled F f Virginia Tech 22

Values of Equivalent Coefficients of Friction AASHTO Equivalent Coefficients of Friction (f) for Practical Stopping Distance Calculations. Speed (m.p.h.) Coefficient of Friction (f) 20 0.40 30 0.35 40 0.32 50 0.30 60 0.29 70 0.28 Virginia Tech 23

Passing Sight Distance Applicable for two-lane roads and two-way highways Major source of concern from a design viewpoint Many assumptions in the analysis (AASHTO, 2004): a) Overtaken vehicle travels at uniform speed b) Passing vehicle trails the overtaken vehicle c) Passing driver needs short period to perceive and react to the passing maneuver d) Delayed start and hurried to the opposing lane e) When the passing vehicle returns to its travel lane there is enough clearance between this vehicle and the oncoming vehicle Virginia Tech 24

Passing Sight Distance Diagram Virginia Tech 25

Assumptions in Passing Sight Distance source: Table 3.1 in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO 2004, pp.120. Virginia Tech 26

Initial maneuver distance (d 1 ) d 1 = 0.278t i v m at + ----- i 2 (5) t i where: is the time of initial maneuver (s), is the average vehicle acceleration (km/hr/s), v is the average speed of the passing vehicle (km/hr), and m is the difference in speeds of the overtaken vehicle and the passing vehicle (km/hr). a Virginia Tech 27

Distance While Passing Vehicle Occupies Left Lane (d 2 ) d 2 = 0.278vt 2 (6) t 2 where: is the time the passing vehicle occupies the left v lane (s) and is the average speed of the passing vehicle (km/hr) Virginia Tech 28

Clearance Length (d 3 ) and Distance Traversed by Opposing Vehicle (d 4 ) Clearance distance d 3 = [ 30, 75] (7) This distance has been found by empirical observations to vary from 30 to 75 meters. Distance traveled by Opposing vehicle 2 d 4 = --d 2 3 (8) Somewhat optimistic assumption but used in practice. Virginia Tech 29

Passing Sight Distance (Design Values) source: Table 3.1 in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO 2004, pp.124. Virginia Tech 30