TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

Similar documents
Traffic Impact and Access Study PROPOSED DURKEE FARM ESTATES. Foster Street Littleton, Massachusetts. Prepared for: Grimes Road, LLC.

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

Transportation Advisory Board

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown

Vehicular turning and path of travel with a proposed curb bulb on the southwest corner of Mount Diablo Boulevard and Dewing Avenue.

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

Monroe County Department of Transportation Vertical Curve Safety Study

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

MEMORANDUM. Discussion of the planned crosswalk improvement on Mount Vernon Road near Stratham Drive

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

Driveway Design Criteria

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Traffic Impact and Access Study. The Preserve at Abbyville Proposed 40B Residential Development. Norfolk, Massachusetts

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

MASER ASSOCIATES. Engineers Planners Surveyors TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY SEA GULL VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF COLTS NECK

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

3 Department of Development Services Tim Snellings, Director Pete Calarco, Assistant Director

ENGINEER S PRELIMINARY REPORT. for the #######-###### COLLISION

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

KDOT Access Management Policy (AMP)

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

7 DESIGN CRITER RIA 7.1 Design Space Requirements

Hidden Oaks Elementary School

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

Troutbeck Farm Development

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESTRICTING PARKING ADJACENT TO 170 AND 171 BRISCO ROAD

Introduction to Roadway Design

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

PEER REVIEW. This letter is to provide a peer review to the City of Leavenworth for the Leavenworth Adventure Park TIA dated October 2018.

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Lake Whitney Elementary School

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

Roadway Design Manual

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

POWELL BUTTE HIGHWAY/NEFF ROAD INTERSECTION Interim Report: Existing Conditions, Needs, and Alternatives Review

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Staff Report Text Amendment Case #: TA

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, North Carolina

Military Road Safety Improvements

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

Access Management Standards

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Traffic Study of Fuller Street, Cady Street, West Street and West Avenue. Final Report

Giles Run Connector Road

Geometric Design Tables

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

Roundabout Design Aid PREPARED BY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

The west side of the intersection is not Fallkirk Drive. It is the Entrance/Exit to Ballantyne Apartments.

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

Durrance Elementary School

180 Grand Avenue, Suite x117 Dowling Associates, Inc.

TECHNICAL MEMO #1 EXISTING CONDITIONS

Draft Report. Traffic Impact Study. Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development. Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Prepared for

SECTION 7 INVENTORY OF SELECTED INTERSECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Date: April 4, Project #: Re: A Street/Binford Street Traffic/Intersection Assessment

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY NOTE 608A. Spacing for Commercial Drives and Streets. To Promote a Uniform Practice in Determining Access Spacing

The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank

THE BERKLEY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BERKLEY, MI

Focused Traffic Analysis for the 200 Nellen Avenue Project

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Windy Ridge Elementary School

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

Include autoturn exhibits of WB-67 trucks at each roundabout.

Appendix H. Traffic Analysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES. Figure Title

4.11 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION

TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane

Transcription:

DRAFT FOR CLIENT REVIEW ONLY TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest MEMORANDUM DATE: August 22, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Patrick Yamashita City of Mercer Island Chris Forster, P.E. TENW Trip Generation & Sight Distance Evaluation TENW Project No. 5523 This memorandum documents the trip generation and sight distance evaluation completed for the proposed 4320 Island Crest Way (Chiu Subdivision) development in Mercer Island, WA. The memo includes a project description, a trip generation estimate, and a sight distance assessment. Key Findings 1. The proposed Chiu Subdivision project is estimated to generate less than 10 new PM peak hour trips. Therefore, based on the City s General Traffic Impact Analysis Requirements, the project does not require a traffic impact analysis (TIA). 2. Stopping sight distance requirements are met at both site access locations on Island Crest Way. 3. Intersection sight distance is acceptable at both site access locations assuming clearing and regrading is conducted within the right-of-way to achieve clear sight lines looking north and south of the proposed access points. Project Description The project site is located at 4320 Island Crest Way in Mercer Island, WA as shown in Attachment A (vicinity map). The proposed development would include 6 single-family residential detached dwelling units. The existing site includes 2 single-family homes, both of which would be removed with the proposed project, resulting in a net addition of 4 single-family units. Vehicular access to/from five of the proposed lots (north access) would be provided via a new full-access private road onto Island Crest Way approximately 66 feet south of the north property line. This access would replace an existing driveway to the existing home on the north half of the site. Vehicular access to/from one lot (south access) would be provided at a new full access driveway located near the south property line in the same location as an existing driveway serving the existing home on the south half of the site. The project is expected to be constructed in 2018. A preliminary site plan is included as Attachment B. Transportation Planning Design Traffic Impact & Operations 11400 SE 8 th Street, Suite 200, Bellevue, WA 98004 Office (425) 889-6747

Trip Generation Estimate The weekday daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed Chiu Subdivision development were based on trip rates documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9 th edition for land use code (LUC) 210 (Single-Family Detached Housing). Table 1 summarizes the trip generation estimate for the project (6 proposed single-family homes less 2 existing single-family homes). Table 1 Chiu Subdivision Trip Generation Summary Net New Trips Generated Time Period In Out Total Weekday Daily 19 19 38 Weekday AM Peak Hour 1 2 3 Weekday PM Peak Hour 3 1 4 As shown in Table 1, the proposed Chiu Subdivision development is estimated to generate 38 net new weekday daily trips with 3 net new weekday AM peak hour trips (1 entering, 2 exiting), and 4 net new weekday PM peak hour trips (3 entering, 1 exiting). The detailed trip generation estimates are included in Attachment C. Based on the City of Mercer Island General Traffic Impact Analysis Requirements dated 7/15/2015, a project requires a traffic impact analysis if the proposed use will generate 10 or more peak hour trips. The proposed Chiu Subdivision development is estimated to generate less than 10 net new peak hour trips. Therefore, the project does not require a traffic impact analysis. Sight Distance Assessment The following summarizes the results of the sight distance assessment conducted at the two site access driveways onto Island Crest Way based on a review of engineering standards, field measurements, and aerial photography. The posted speed limit on Island Crest Way in the vicinity of the project is 35 mph. A design speed of 40 MPH (posted speed + 5 MPH) was assumed for this analysis. The grade on Island Crest Way in the vicinity of the proposed site access location is less than 3 percent. Therefore, no adjustments were made to account for grade. For this assessment, we analyzed both Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) and Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) based on the standards in AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6 th Edition, 2011 (AASHTO). North Access Intersection Sight Distance (ISD): Based on AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6 th Edition, 2011 Table 9-6 (Case B1, Left Turn from Stop), the minimum required left turn ISD for a 40 MPH design speed is 445 feet. Because TENW August 22, 2017 Page 2

Island Crest Way is a multilane roadway (vehicles must cross 2 lanes to turn left from the access driveways), this value was adjusted based on AASHTO standards to 470 feet by adjusting the time gap. ISD was measured based on an entering vehicle driver eye height of 3.5 feet, measured 14.5 feet back from the edge of traveled way. ISD Looking North: The available ISD at the Island Crest Way/North Access intersection looking north will meet or exceed 470 feet assuming existing vegetation is cleared and any slope regraded to obtain a clear line of sight. Based on our review of aerial photography and property lines from King County Parcel Viewer, it appears that all required clearing would be within existing City right-of-way (ROW). A diagram showing the ISD sight line looking north is provided in Attachment D. View looking north on Island Crest Way from north site access location (view is from a point 6 feet behind the existing curb due to existing vegetation) ISD Looking South: The maximum available ISD at the Island Crest Way/North Access intersection looking south would be approximately 404 feet (does not meet the 470-foot standard) using the existing ROW line as the limiting factor (sight line tangent to ROW line). Meeting the 470-foot standard is not feasible as the line of sight crosses into private property due to the horizontal curve in Island Crest Way. In order for 404 feet of ISD to be achieved, existing vegetation must be cleared and slope regraded within the limits of the existing ROW. TENW August 22, 2017 Page 3

While 404 feet of ISD is less than the AASHTO standard for left-turns, it is greater than the minimum required ISD for a right turn. Based on AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6 th Edition, 2011 Table 9-7 Case B2, Right Turn from Stop, the standard for a 40 MPH design speed is 385 feet for right turns. Considering the fact that a majority of the traffic from these homes will be right turns onto Island Crest Way (as opposed to left-turns), we believe that 404 feet of ISD is acceptable (with clearing/regrading within ROW). In addition, TENW also reviewed the most recent 3-year collision history (2014-2016 WSDOT data) and confirmed that there were no reported collisions at the existing north site driveway (or at any of the nearby driveways on Island Crest Way). Diagrams showing the ISD sight lines looking south (470 feet and 404 feet) are provided in Attachment D. View looking south on Island Crest Way from north site access location (view is from a point 6 feet behind the existing curb due to existing vegetation) Stopping Sight Distance (SSD): Based on AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6 th Edition, 2011 Table 3-1 (Stopping Sight Distance on Level Roadways), the minimum required SSD for a 40 MPH design speed is 305 feet. SSD was measured based on an approaching vehicle driver eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 2.0 feet. SSD was measured along the centerline of the curb-side lane on Island Crest Way. Northbound: Based on field measurements, the existing available SSD for a vehicle traveling northbound on Island Crest Way approaching the north access location exceeds 305 feet. TENW August 22, 2017 Page 4

Southbound: Based on field measurements, the existing available SSD for a vehicle traveling southbound on Island Crest Way approaching the north access location exceeds 305 feet. South Access Intersection Sight Distance (ISD): Based on AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6 th Edition, 2011 Table 9-6 (Case B1, Left Turn from Stop), the minimum required left turn ISD for a 40 MPH design speed is 445 feet. Because Island Crest Way is a multilane roadway (vehicles must cross 2 lanes to turn left from the access driveways), this value was adjusted based on AASHTO standards to 470 feet by adjusting the time gap. ISD was measured based on an entering vehicle driver eye height of 3.5 feet, measured 14.5 feet back from the edge of traveled way ISD Looking North: The available ISD at the Island Crest Way/South Access intersection looking north will meet or exceed 470 feet assuming existing vegetation is cleared and any slope regraded to obtain a clear line of sight (currently the available ISD is only 255 feet due to existing vegetation). Based on our review of aerial photography and property lines from King County Parcel Viewer, it appears that all required clearing would be within existing City right-of-way (ROW). A diagram showing the ISD sight line looking north is provided in Attachment E. View looking north on Island Crest Way from south site access location (14.5 feet behind curb) TENW August 22, 2017 Page 5

ISD Looking South: The maximum available ISD at the Island Crest Way/South Access intersection looking south would be approximately 310 feet (does not meet the 470-foot standard) using the existing ROW line as the limiting factor (sight line tangent to ROW line). Meeting the 470-foot standard is not feasible as the line of sight crosses into private property due to the horizontal curve in Island Crest Way. In order for 310 feet of ISD to be achieved, existing vegetation must be cleared and possibly slope regraded within the limits of the existing ROW. While 310 feet of ISD is less than the AASHTO standard, it is greater than the required SSD standard of 305 feet. Meeting the minimum SSD standard ensures that safe ingress/egress can occur as there will be more than sufficient sight distance available for vehicles travelling on Island Crest Way to be able to stop for conflicting traffic. In addition, it should be noted that this is a driveway to one single family home at a location where one already exists. The existing available ISD looking south at this location is only 145 feet. If the recommended clearing of vegetation and regrading is conducted within the limits of existing ROW, the resulting ISD will be a significant improvement over existing conditions (more than 2 times the existing ISD). TENW also reviewed the most recent 3-year collision history (2014-2016 WSDOT data) and confirmed that there were no reported collisions at the existing driveway (or at any of the adjacent driveways on Island Crest Way). Based on these considerations, we believe that 310 feet of ISD is acceptable (with clearing/regrading within ROW) for an access to a single family dwelling. Diagrams showing the ISD sight lines looking south (470 feet and 310 feet) are provided in Attachment E. View looking south on Island Crest Way from south site access location (14.5 feet behind curb) TENW August 22, 2017 Page 6

Stopping Sight Distance (SSD): Based on AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6 th Edition, 2011 Table 3-1 (Stopping Sight Distance on Level Roadways), the minimum required SSD for a 40 MPH design speed is 305 feet. SSD was measured based on an approaching vehicle driver eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 2.0 feet. SSD was measured along the centerline of the curb-side lane on Island Crest Way. Northbound: Based on field measurements, the existing available SSD for a vehicle traveling northbound on Island Crest Way approaching the south access location exceeds 305 feet. Southbound: Based on field measurements, the existing available SSD for a vehicle traveling southbound on Island Crest Way approaching the south access location exceeds 305 feet Sight Distance: Conclusions 1. Stopping sight distance requirements are met at both site access locations on Island Crest Way. 2. Intersection sight distance is acceptable at both site access locations assuming clearing and regrading is conducted within the right-of-way to achieve clear sight lines looking north and south of the proposed access points. If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at 206-498- 5897 or email at forster@tenw.com. cc: Jayson Taylor Alan Chiu Attachments A. Vicinity Map B. Preliminary Site Plan C. Trip Generation Estimate D. Preliminary ISD Sight Line Diagrams North Access E. Preliminary ISD Sight Line Diagrams South Access TENW August 22, 2017 Page 7

ATTACHMENT A Site Vicinity Map

ATTACHMENT B Preliminary Site Plan

ATTACHMENT C Trip Generation Estimate Weekday Daily ITE Directional Split Trip Rate Trips Generated Land Use Units 1 LUC 2 In Out Total In Out Total Proposed Use Single-Family 6 DU 210 50% 50% 9.52 28 29 57 Less Existing Use Single-Family 2 DU 210 50% 50% 9.52-9 -10-19 Total Net New Weekday Daily Trips Generated = 19 19 38 AM Peak Hour Trip Generation ITE Directional Split Trip Rate Trips Generated Land Use Units LUC 1 In Out Total In Out Total Proposed Use Single-Family 6 DU 210 25% 75% 0.75 1 4 5 Less Existing Use Single-Family 2 DU 210 25% 75% 0.75 0-2 -2 Total Net New AM Peak Hour Trips Generated = 1 2 3 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation ITE Directional Split Trip Rate Trips Generated Land Use Units LUC 1 In Out Total In Out Total Proposed Use Single-Family 6 DU 210 63% 37% 1.00 4 2 6 Less Existing Use Single-Family 2 DU 210 63% 37% 1.00-1 -1-2 Notes: Total Net New PM Peak Hour Trips Generated = 3 1 4 1 DU = Dwelling Units. 2 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 9th edition Land Use Code.

ATTACHMENT D North Access ISD Sight Line Diagrams

D1 NORTH ACCESS: ESD Looking North 40 MPH Design Speed AASHTO Standard = 470' ESD MET assuming clearing within ROW 80'-0" Sight Line 66'-0" 470'-0" CENTER OF SITE ACCESS 5'-6"

D2 NORTH ACCESS: ESD Looking South 40 MPH Design Speed AASHTO Standard = 470' ESD NOT MET 20'-0" 80'-0" 5'-6" 66'-0" CENTER OF SITE ACCESS ESD SIGHT LINE OUTSIDE OF CITY RIGHT OF WAY 470'-0" Sight Line

D3 NORTH ACCESS: ESD Looking South Approx. Max ESD Measured = 404 FT (assuming clearing within City ROW) 20.0 ft 80.0 ft 5.5 ft 66.0 ft CENTER OF SITE ACCESS ESD SIGHT LINE TANGENT TO CITY RIGHT OF WAY 404.0 ft Sight Line

ATTACHMENT E South Access ISD Sight Line Diagrams

E1 SOUTH ACCESS: ESD Looking North 40 MPH Design Speed AASHTO Standard = 470' ESD MET assuming clearing within ROW 20'-0" 80'-0" Sight Line 470'-0" CENTER OF SITE ACCESS 5'-6"

E2 SOUTH ACCESS: ESD Looking South 40 MPH Design Speed AASHTO Standard = 470' ESD NOT MET 5'-6" CENTER OF SITE ACCESS ESD SIGHT LINE OUTSIDE CITY RIGHT OF WAY 90'-0" 470'-0" Sight Line

E3 SOUTH ACCESS: ESD Looking South Approx. Max ESD Measured = 310 FT (assuming clearing within City ROW) 5'-6" CENTER OF SITE ACCESS ESD SIGHT LINE TANGENT TO CITY RIGHT OF WAY 310'-0" 90'-0" Sight Line