THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SKI AREAS ON THE ECONOMY OF NORTH CAROLINA SEASON. Final Report

Similar documents
The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina

Big Blue Adventure Event Analysis UTC Tourism Center October 2016

Golfers in Colorado: The Role of Golf in Recreational and Tourism Lifestyles and Expenditures

Residential Jurisdistions of Attendees 1998 Breeders Cup Races in Louisville

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

The University of Georgia

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

Oregon 2011 Regional Visitor Report Mt. Hood Columbia River Gorge

Economic Impact Analysis BOONE DOCKS RESORT AND MARINA, LLC

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT OF THE 2018 NCAA DIVISION I MEN S FINAL FOUR BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT IN SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado July 2009

CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL

APPENDIX 3: EAGLECREST MASTER PLAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS

Michigan Golf Tourists - Economic Impacts 1

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

Economic Impact of Mountain Biking in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat

The Economic Impact of Colonial Downs in Virginia

The 2010 Economic Contribution of Tourism to the Meadowlands Liberty Region

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

Video Lottery/Tourism Promotion

A study prepared for: Presented by:

The Economic Contributions of Hunting- Related Tourism in Eastern and Southern Africa

SKI THE SLOPES WITH ST. JAMES

1997 WINTER INQUIRY STUDY: MONITORING MEDIA EFFECTIVENESS AND ASSESSING VERMONT=S SKI MARKET

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

A Measure of the Economic Impact of Keeneland Racing and Sales on Lexington-Fayette County. Prepared by the Center for Business and Economic Research

hyped pro shop sales by merchandising new club designs

Accuplacer Arithmetic Study Guide

The Power of Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania:

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Montauk Beach Restoration Project. Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York January 2013

The 35th Annual Marine Corps Marathon. Economic Contribution and. Characteristics of Visitors and Local Spectators. Final Report.

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY

Methodology and Response Group Size and Age of Survey Respondents Summary of Passenger Comments and Suggestions Residency and Overnight Lodging

A Comparison of Highway Construction Costs in the Midwest and Nationally

MATH-4 CAT-KNAPP-place value Exam not valid for Paper Pencil Test Sessions

We started a whole new ball game.

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

THE FUTURE OF SALES TAX REVENUE

APPENDIX A SURVEY FORM

EAST VILLAGE SHOPPERS STUDY A SNAPSHOT OF TRAVEL AND SPENDING PATTERNS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS IN THE EAST VILLAGE

State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands

BICYCLING AND WALKING IN COLORADO:

GSOC Winter Park Ski Train- February Saturday February 9, Saturday February 16th, 2019

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon

HIS CHARACTERISTICS AND PREFERENCES

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

VALLEY GARDENS OVERNIGHT SKI & SNOWBOARD TRIP

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

Using and Representing Whole Numbers. Chapter 1 Review

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability

Oregon 2013 Regional Visitor Report Mt. Hood Columbia River Gorge

SKI BRADFORD 2018 Program Information, Grades 4-8 Please read through this packet before completing your registration and keep it for your reference.

15, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy. Prepared for: Ketchikan Visitors Bureau

City of Winston-Salem 2006 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report

Education Committee Economic Background and Issue Review

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington

GRE PROJECTS $78 MILLION IMPACT FROM 2013 PGA CHAMPIONSHIP TOURNAMENT TO BE HELD AT ROCHESTER S OAK HILL COUNTRY CLUB AUG. 5-11, 2013 Overview

SKI BRADFORD Program Information, Grades 4-8 Please read through this packet before completing your registration and keep it for your reference.

-Trip Dates- Tuesday, November 7, Dear Parent/Guardian:

Annual Report. U.S. Cellular Community Park. Economic Impact Analysis Annual Statistics 2016 Highlights 2017 Event Schedule

BICYCLE TOURISM IN MAINE: ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND MARKETING

2017/2018 WINTER GROUPS BOOKING PACKAGE

Economic Impact of the Michigan Equine Industry, 2006

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

Annual Report. U.S. Cellular Community Park. Economic Impact Analysis Annual Statistics 2017 Highlights 2018 Event Schedule

WILDLIFE WATCHING U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 2006 NATIONAL SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS*

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BICYCLING IN THE CENTRAL SHENANDOAH VALLEY

Economic Benefits of Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities

TARANAKI VISITOR STATISTICS SEPTEMBER 2017

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

Kissimmee Visitor Profile

EAGLECREST MISSION STATEMENT FY06 APPROVED BUDGET $1,548,500 CORE SERVICES FUNDING SOURCES

ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MIDDLE FORK OF THE SALMON FLOATER SPENDING ON LOCAL ECONOMIES

Three Rivers Alpine Patrol

The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey

HIGH YIELD ANGLERS IN RTO13: A SITUATION ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

Nevada County Population Projections 2013 to 2032 Based On The Last Estimate Year of 2012

2 Day Weekend Road Trip From $255pp ($255pp June 8-29 & Sept 3-21; $265pp 6,13 July & 31 August; $279pp 20 July 24 August)

Brook Trout Angling in Maine2009 Survey Results

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008

Evaluating the ECONOMIC IMPACT of Shared Use Paths

ISM Ski Trip to Switzerland Thursday 27 March Sunday 6 April 2014

GRE ESTIMATES $102.1 MILLION IMPACT FROM 2013 PGA CHAMPIONSHIP

Walkable Retail: When Old Becomes New Again Part 1

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

ON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION

DRBC RFAC Meeting Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center - Hawley, PA. December 3, 2015

Transcription:

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SKI AREAS ON THE ECONOMY OF NORTH CAROLINA 2002-2003 SEASON Final Report Prepared for the North Carolina Ski Areas Association By Dr. Steven W. Millsaps Dr. Peter A. Groothuis Department of Economics Appalachian State University November 2003

PART ONE The North Carolina Ski Industry The North Carolina Ski Industry is located in western area of the state. The seven ski areas included in this study were: Appalachian Ski Mountain, Ski Beech, Sapphire Valley Ski Area, Hawksnest Golf & Ski Resort, Wolf Laurel, Sugar Mountain Resort, and Cataloochee Ski Area. During the 2002-03 season, over 540,000 skier visits were recorded at these ski areas. The aggregate resort revenue from these skier visits was just over 23 million dollars, a 21.6 percent increase from the 2001-02 ski season. The seven resorts employ eighty-four year-round full-time employees. The seasonal fulltime employment is over nine-hundred people plus over eight-hundred part-time people. The annual payroll is almost seven million dollars. Capital expenditures from the seven resorts exceeded four million dollars, roughly double the expenditures for the 2001-02 season. Table One contains summary statistics for total skier visits, total ski resort revenues, total ski resort employment and total ski resort payroll for various ski seasons beginning with 1976-77, the first year a survey was administered. Figure One illustrates the trend in skier visits since the 1976-77 ski season. North Carolina s 1995-96 ski season still holds the alltime attendance record with over 641,000 skier visits.

Table One SUMMARY STATISTICS ON NORTH CAROLINA SKI AREA RESORTS (current and selected prior yers) Total Total Total Total Skier Resort Resort Resort Year Visits Revenues Payroll Employment** 1976-77 338,000 $5.7 mil. $1.4 mil. 760 1985-86 580,000 * $3.0 mil. 1,100 1995-96 641,000 $22.0 mil. * 1,404 2000-01 544,000 $21.5 mil. $6.6 mil. 1,788 2001-02 476,000 $18.9 mil. $6.5 mil. 1,644 2002-03 544,000 $23.1 mil. $6.9 mil. 1,759 Source: 2002-03 Survey of Ski Area Owners * Not available ** Seasonal full-time plus part-time employees Figure One Skier Visits to NC Resorts 1989-90 to 2002-2003 (various years) 700 641 Skier Visits (in thousands) 600 500 400 300 200 390 299 399 451 524 465 414 465 544 476 544 100 0 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 Ski Season

PART TWO The Research Design and Survey Instrument The expenditures of visitors to the North Carolina ski areas were estimated using a survey questionnaire (see Appendix A). A random sample of skiers and snowboarders at the resort areas were asked to complete the questionnaire while on-site at the resort. The survey was administered during the months of December through February, the majority of the 2002-03 ski season. A total of 261 surveys were completed from five of the ski areas Appalachian, Beech Mountain, Cataloochee, Hawksnest, and Sugar Mountain. The survey is designed to ascertain skier information in two important areas: (1) demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of skiers including their criteria for selecting ski areas, their skiing ability and experience, their evaluation of the quality of their skiing experience while in North Carolina, and their intentions regarding return visits in the future, and (2) expenditures by visitors to the ski areas, including spending at the resort itself (lift tickets, clothing and equipment rentals, parking fees, etc., and expenditures offresort (food, lodging, transportation expenses, clothing and equipment, entertainment, etc.). The expenditure portion of the survey is used to estimate total direct spending by skiers visiting the area. The expenditures were broken down into two categories: Spending Within 25 Miles of the Ski Resort and Spending Farther Away but Still In North Carolina. These two categories summed provide an estimate of direct skier expenditures in North Carolina.

PART THREE Statistical Summary of Ski Area Participants The North Carolina ski industry is an economic contributor to the local and state economy through its employment base, through its expenditures on goods and services in the area, and through the spending of visitors to the resort area (both on and off the resort). Residents from the western part of the state, including a large student population of skiers from local private and state colleges and universities, are within a few hours driving time to one of the resorts. Residents from other Southeastern states are within one day s travel from their homes to the ski areas Skiers in the North Carolina Ski Areas come from as far away as California and as close as I own a home across from the ski area. The average distance traveled to the ski resort was 260 miles. While forty percent of the skiers come from within North Carolina, the majority come from out of state with eighteen percent from Georgia, sixteen percent from South Carolina and fourteen percent from Florida. The mountains of North Carolina have become the winter playground of the South. Skiers tend to travel in groups to ski resorts with the average group size of nine participants. Large groups are common with as many as sixty participants. Over seventy percent of visitors to the resorts ski, while about twenty percent snowboard and five percent tube. The vast majority, over ninety percent, indicate that the visiting the ski area was their primary motivation for their trip. In addition, ninety percent intend to visit the same ski area next ski season.

Skiers plan to ski an average four days at the resort where they answered the questionnaire and an additional two days at other ski resorts in North Carolina. Skiers to the North Carolina mountains report a wide range of ability with 28% reporting beginner skills, 27% low intermediate skills, 36% high intermediate and 9% advanced skills. Eighteen percent report that this is their first ski experience. In addition skiers also plan on shopping, eating at restaurants, visiting other area attractions such as the Smoky Mountains and the Blue Ridge Parkway, and enjoying the winter scenery on their ski trip. PART FOUR Statistical Summary of Skier Visits and Expenditures Aggregate Skier Visit Expenditures The expenditures per skier visit are summarized in Table Two and Figure Two. In Table Two the average spending in dollars by category (ski resort, lodging, restaurant, etc.) is displayed. The average expenditure was $124.48 per skier visit broken down as follows: $117.42 (94.3%) spent within 25 miles of the ski resort and $7.06 (5.7%) spent farther away than 25 miles but still within North Carolina. Figure Two displays the percentage breakdown of spending in North Carolina by category of spending. Spending at the ski resort represented thirty-five percent of the total expenditure. Lodging accounted for twenty-one percent of the spending with restaurant expenditures adding another eleven percent. These three categories of spending make up two-thirds of total skier spending in North Carolina.

Within 25 Miles Farther Away But Total Percent Type of Expenditure of Ski Resort ($) Still in NC ($) Expenditures ($) of Total Ski Resort 43.20 43.20 34.70 Lodging 25.20 1.38 26.58 21.35 Restaurant 12.70 0.70 13.40 10.76 Clothing & Equipment 10.85 0.55 11.40 9.16 Automobile 6.38 1.18 7.56 6.07 Other Retail Shopping 6.17 0.12 6.29 5.05 Retail Food & Beverage 6.02 0.68 6.70 5.38 Commercial Transportation 3.97 2.25 6.22 5.00 Night Club/Bar 1.23 0.12 1.35 1.08 Admission Fees 0.66 0.05 0.71 0.57 Child Care 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.22 Personal Health 0.25 0.03 0.28 0.22 All Other Expenses 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.41 Total 117.42 7.06 124.48 100.00 Source: 2002-03 Survey Questionnaire Table Two AVERAGE SPENDING PER PERSON 2002-03 SKI SEASON Figure Two: Percentage of Expenditures by Category of Spending 2002-03 Ski Season (total spending) Commercial Transportation 5% Retail Food & Be verage 5% All Other Expenses 3% Other Retail Shopping 5% Automobile 6% Ski Resort 35% Clothing & Equipment 9% Restaurant 11% Lodging 21%

Aggregate Skier Expenditures The total direct spending by category was found by multiplying the average spending per category by the number of skier visits. The results are summarized in Table Three. The results show that skiers spend an estimated total of $67.7 million: $63.9 million of this total was spent within 25 miles of the resort and the remaining $3.8 million was spent farther away but still within North Carolina. Spending at ski resorts received the largest share at $23.5 million. Lodging expenditures totaled almost $14.5 million and restaurant spending totaled another $7.3 million. Spending for clothing and equipment outside the ski resort totaled $6.2 million. Expenditures for food and beverages consumed away from the resort and not in restaurants totaled $3.6 million. Retail shopping not included in the previous categories totaled $3.4 million. Table Three TOTAL ESTIMATED DIRECT SKIER EXPENDITURES IN NORTH CAROLINA* 2002-03 SKI SEASON (millions of $) Within 25 Miles Farther Away But Total Percent of Type of Expenditure of Ski Resort (mils. $) Still in NC (mils. $) Expenditure (mils. $) Total Ski Resort 23.51 23.51 34.70 Lodging 13.71 0.75 14.46 21.35 Restaurant 6.91 0.38 7.29 10.76 Clothing & Equipment 5.90 0.30 6.20 9.16 Automobile 3.48 0.64 4.12 6.07 Other Retail Shopping 3.36 0.07 3.43 5.05 Retail Food & Beverage 3.28 0.37 3.65 5.38 Commercial Transportation 2.16 1.22 3.38 5.00 Night Club/Bar 0.67 0.07 0.74 1.08 Admission Fees 0.36 0.03 0.39 0.57 Child Care 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.22 Personal Health 0.14 0.02 0.16 0.22 All Other Expenses 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.41 Total 63.90 3.85 67.75 100.00 Source: Table Two * Average Spending Per Person (from Table Two) x 544,219 Skier Visits

The majority of this spending occurs during the months of December, January, and February when local hotel occupancy rates are lowest (about 40% v. 73.5% in July and 67.5% in October). Thus, the economic impact of the timing of the expenditures is as important to the local economy as the amount of the expenditures. Absent the ski industry, local folks in the restaurant business, the lodging business, and the retail shopping business might be in for a cold winter indeed. PART FIVE The Total Economic Impact In Part Four, the direct spending by skiers was discussed. In order to estimate the total economic effect of the North Carolina Ski Industry, we must next consider and estimate the indirect effect of expenditures within the state. The indirect or multiplier effect of direct spending generates additional income within North Carolina. When the income of the ski resorts and local businesses rises due to direct skier expenditures on goods and services, they, in turn, increase their own spending. This will generate additional income within the area. The total impact is calculated as the sum of both the direct and indirect impacts. In this study, we used a multiplier of 1.77. 1 This value implies that each dollar of direct spending generates an additional, or indirect spending, of 77 cents. Direct spending was estimated to be $67.7 million (see Table Three). Thus, the estimated total economic impact of the North Carolina Ski Industry for the 2002-03 season is almost $120 million. The indirect effect is estimated to be just over $52 million. 1 The indirect or multiplier effect was determined by the minimum requirements technique suggested by Moore: Craig L. Moore, A New Look at the Regional Trade Multiplier, Northeast Regional Science Review, Vol. 3,1973, pp. 164-171; Craig L. Moore, A New Look at the Minimum Requirements Approach to Regional Economic Analysis, Economic Geography, Vol. 51,1975, pp.350-356. This multiplier is the same value used in the two previous economic impact studies (1989-90 season and 1995-96 season) conducted at Appalachian. See also R. Kirkpatrick and J. Shogren, The Economic Impact of Appalachian State University on Watauga County, North Carolina, November (1988).

Appendices

APPENDIX A SURVEY INSTRUMENT 2002-2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT SURVEY PART I: GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR VISIT TO THIS RESORT 1. How many individuals are traveling in your party on this trip (include yourself)? 2. In this party, how many individuals are going to: SKI SNOWBOARD SKATE TUBE OTHER (specify) 3. Why did you choose to come to this ski area? 4. When did you plan this trip? TODAY LESS THAN ONE WEEK AGO 1-3 WEEKS AGO 4-8 WEEKS AGO MORE THAN 8 WKS. AGO 5. Is skiing/snowboarding the primary reason for this trip to the N.C. mountains? YES NO If NO, please list your primary reason 6. Why did your party choose to visit this particular resort? 7. Including travel time, how many days will this trip last? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE THAN WEEK 8. How many nights will you spend in area hotel lodging? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORE THAN 1 WEEK 9. From where you live, how many miles did you travel one way to this resort? miles. 10. Please list two other attractions or activities you plan for this trip to the mountains. 1. 2. 11. On this trip, for how many sessions does your party plan to purchase lift tickets? 12. During this year s outdoor season, for how many days do you expect to ski/snowboard? days at this resort. days at other NC resorts days at resorts outside of NC Where outside NC?

13. How do you rate the quality of your skiing/snowboarding experience at this resort? EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR If you rated the experience as FAIR or POOR, please explain your concerns. 14. Do you plan a return trip to this resort next year? YES NO 15. Have you seen this year s SKI NORTH CAROLINA TV advertisement? YES NO 16. Where is your home? CITY STATE 17. In total, how much does your group expect to spend on this skiing/snowboarding trip? $ PART II: GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR SKIING/SNOWBOARDING 1. Is this a first time skiing/snowboarding experience for you? YES NO 2. Is this a first time experience for any other members in your party? YES(how many) NO 3. Did you take a lesson? YES NO 4. Did your visit involve a night session only? YES NO 5. How do you rate your skiing/snowboarding ability? BEGINNER LOW INTERMEDIATE HIGH INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED

PART III: EXPENDITURES In order to estimate the economic impact of the ski/snowboard industry on North Carolina, we are interested in finding the total amount of money you and the other members of your party spent attending area ski/snowboard resorts during 2002-2003. This total amount spent includes items that may have been purchased prior to your trip to the ski resort. In the space below, please list the estimated amount you and others traveling with you spent or will spend during this trip. When recording the dollar amount, please identify such expenditures according to where they were made. Please round each estimate to the nearest whole dollar amount. Type of Expenditure Ski Resort Expenses: (spending at this resort for lift tickets, food and beverages, equipment and clothing rentals, souvenirs, parking fees, tubing and ice skating, etc) Location of Expenses Within 25 miles More than 25 miles of resort but still in NC Lodging Expenses: (spending for motel, hotel, bed and breakfast, overnight fees) Restaurants NOT AT RESORT: (spending for dining and/or catering away from the restaurant at this resort) Clothing and Equipment NOT AT RESORT: (spending for clothing [e.g., jackets and bibs] and equipment [e.g., skis, snowboards, boots] bought elsewhere for use on this trip.) Private Auto Expenses: (spending for gas, oil, repairs, towing fees, traffic tickets, etc.) Food and Beverages: (spending for food and beverages in retail stores [grocery, package, e.g.]) Admission Fees: (spending for concerts, plays, theaters, and sporting events) Night Clubs and Bars: (spending for drinks, snacks, cover charges, etc.) Commercial Transportation: (spending for airline, bus, train, rental car, taxi/limo) Personal and Health Expenses: (spending for barber shop, beauty shop, doctor, lawyer, dry cleaning and laundry, emergency room, etc.) Other Retail Shopping: (spending in retail stores for gifts, etc.) Baby-Sitter Fees: Any Other Expenses: (please identify ) How many individuals were included in these expenditures? (Your answer should be the same as Question #1 on the survey)

APPENDIX B SURVEY INSTRUMENT SUMMARY 2002-2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT SURVEY PART I: GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR VISIT TO THIS RESORT 1.How many individuals are traveling in your party on this trip (include yourself)? 9.0 -MEAN 5 -MEDIAN 4 -MODE 1 -MINIMUM 60 -MAXIMUM 2. In this party, how many individuals are going to: 6.52 (71.3%) SKI 1.71 (19.2%) SNOWBOARD 0.12 (1.3%) SKATE 0.42 (4.7%) TUBE 0.11 (1.2%) OTHER 3. Why did you choose to come to this ski area? (most common) been here before, close to home, convenient, friends, price, word of mouth, school/church/scout trip 4. When did you plan this trip? 7.4% -TODAY 24.3% -LESS THAN ONE WEEK AGO 24.6% -1-3 WEEKS AGO 22.7% 4-8 WEEKS AGO 21.0% -MORE THAN 8 WKS. AGO 5. Is skiing/snowboarding the primary reason for this trip to the N.C. mountains? 89.2% YES If NO, please list your primary reason (most common) -Family/relatives, -mountains, -vacation, -school, -live here, -see snow 6. Why did your party choose to visit this particular resort? Close to home, went here last year, good skiing 7. Including travel time, how many days will this trip last? 2.88 MEAN

8. How many nights will you spend in area hotel lodging? 1.52 MEAN 9. From where you live, how many miles did you travel one way to this resort? 258.5 MEAN 180 MEDIAN 200 MODE 1 MINIMUM 2000 MAXIMUM 10. Please list two other attractions or activities you plan for this trip to the mountains. Grandfather mountain, Smokey Mountains, Blowing Rock, shopping 11. On this trip, for how many sessions does your party plan to purchase lift tickets? 2.77 MEAN 12. During this year s outdoor season, for how many days do you expect to ski/snowboard? 4.2 days at this resort. 1.9 days at other NC resorts 1.6 days at resorts outside of NC Where outside NC? West Virginia 17 Colorado 8 Virginia 5 Tennessee 3 Georgia 2 Utah 2 Pennsylvania 1 New York 1 Chili 1 13. How do you rate the quality of your skiing/snowboarding experience at this resort? 33.9% -EXCELLENT 52.8% -GOOD 10.6% -FAIR 2.7% -POOR If you rated the experience as FAIR or POOR, please explain your concerns. busy-congested, icy-slushy-rainy weather concerns, too many beginners 14. Do you plan a return trip to this resort next year? 87.5% YES

15. Have you seen this year s SKI NORTH CAROLINA TV advertisement? 16.6% YES 16. Are you familiar with the Gold Card Program? 14.3% YES 17. In total, how much does your group expect to spend on this skiing/snowboarding trip? $1094.29 MEAN $500- MEDIAN $1000 MODE $0 MINIMUM $8000 MAXIMUM PART II: GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR SKIING/SNOWBOARDING 1. Is this a first time skiing/snowboarding experience for you? 18.4% YES 2. Is this a first time experience for any other members in your party? 50.2 YES 3.Did you take a lesson? 24.1 YES 4. Did your visit involve a night session only? 23.8 YES 5. How do you rate your skiing/snowboarding ability? 28.2 BEGINNER 26.9 LOW INTERMEDIATE 35.9 -HIGH INTERMEDIATE 9.0 ADVANCED 6.Where is your home? STATE 40.2% -North Carolina 18.4% -Georgia 15.7% -South Carolina 13.8% -Florida 5.7% -Tennessee 2.3%-Other (CA, KY, LA, MS, NY, TX)