Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Similar documents
Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

Water surface slope extending up to 20 channel widths up and downstream of crossing.

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

Joe Rathbun Michigan DEQ Water Resources Division Nonpoint Source Unit * Thanks to The Nature Conservancy

Added Introduction: Comparing highway design and stream design

Simulating Streams Through Culverts in Mat-Su, Alaska

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

Presented by Fred Halterman, URS Jennie Agerton, URS

General Information for Culvert Design

CHAPTER 4 SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN

CALIFORNIA SALMONID STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION MANUAL APPENDIX IX-A CULVERT CRITERIA FOR FISH PASSAGE INTRODUCTION

Habitat Conditions, Design Strategies,

Assessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at. Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595. Marquette County, Michigan

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Three Mile Creek 2011

Fish Passage Assessment Report Mare Brook Culverts

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

SELBY CREEK SILVERADO TRAIL CULVERT FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT

Geomorphic Stream Classification A Classification of Natural Rivers, Rosgen, D.L.

Hydrologic, Hydraulic and Geomorphic Technical Memorandum

Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington. Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc.

Stream Assessment. Date. Data Collected by. Location. Name of Stream and River Basin. Stream Order. Streambank Materials. Streambank Vegetation

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

Cross-Vane Plan View FIN-UP Habitat Consultants, Inc. 220 Illinois Avenue Manitou Springs, CO (719) P.

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

Stephens Creek Culvert Replacement. CAC April 28, 2010

Management of headwater streams in the White Mountain National Forest

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

Massachusetts Stream Crossing Case Studies

Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage. Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 1 / 6 Spring 2012 updated 1/27/2012

Understanding the Impacts of Culvert Performance on Stream Health

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

Illinois State Water Survey

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek

Quantifying Performance of Stream Simulation Culverts in the Chehalis Basin, WA

Culvert Design Basics

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

BC Ministry of Forests. March Fish Stream Crossing Guidebook. Forest Practices Code of British Columbia.

Delaware Basin Stream Management Program

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Rehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011.

Packwood Hydroelectric Project Barrier Analysis December 12, 2006

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;

TREATING RIVERS RIGHT & EXAMPLES OF BEST USE OF WOOD IN RESTORATION

RESTORING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN CREEK AND LAKE: FRESH WATER ESTUARINE CREATION IN MISSISSAUGA

CE 535, Spring 2002 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

Design Report for Janes Creek Roughened Channel

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

Fish Friendly Crossings- Examples from Nash Stream

Fish Passage at Road Crossings Assessment Boise National Forest FY 2004

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

Hydraulic Modeling of Stream Enhancement Methods

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES

Salmon Run G.C. Hole 3: Tributary & Wetland Restoration

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

Gaviota Creek Fish Passage and Geomorphic Assessment

Little Traverse Bay Watershed Road/Stream Crossing Inventory

LONGITUDINAL FIELD METHODOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF TMDL SEDIMENT AND HABITAT IMPAIRMENTS

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

The Basics of Culvert and Inlet Design

Components of a Barrage

OKANAGAN RIVER RESTORATION INITIATIVE - FAQ

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

Stevens Creek Corridor

Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence

FISH PASSAGE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ON PENNYPACK CREEK AT VERREE ROAD DAM AND ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD DAM PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

Fish Habitat Design, Operation and Reclamation Worksheets for

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS IN THE NOTES AUTUMN 2018

Applying Engineering Solutions to the Science of Protection and Enhancement of Aquatic Environments. Bill Holman, P.E. Stanley Consultants

FSOC Upstream Fish Passage Guidance Document

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

Fish Passage Culvert Assessment for Cahilty Creek Watershed FIA Project #

Rock Ramp Design Guidelines. David Mooney MS Chris Holmquist-Johnson MS Drew Baird Ph.D. P.E. Kent Collins P.E.

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

TOP:001.3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service TECHNICAL OPERATING PROCEDURE

2O-2 Open Channel Flow

USING A LABYRINTH WEIR TO INCREASE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY. Dustin Mortensen, P.E. 1 Jake Eckersley, P.E. 1

Vermont. Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department 1 National Life Drive Montpelier, VT

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

STREAM CROSSING INVENTORY AND BARRIER RANKING GUIDELINES

Fish Passage Design Aids Wildlife Crossing in Washington State State of the Practice

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

APPENDIX D: North Fork Nooksack Sub-basin Report

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

Report prepared for: Prepared by: January 2002 BEAK Ref

Follow this and additional works at:

Fremont Weir Fish Passage Proof of Concept. Final Engineering Report

Reconnecting Waters; Reconnecting Roads

Identifying and Executing Stream Projects Kristin Thomas, Aquatic Ecologist MITU


Creation of Fish and Wildlife Habitat on the Closed Salmon Harbour Mine in Minto, NB

Fish Migration Barrier Severity and Steelhead Habitat Quality in the Malibu Creek Watershed

Transcription:

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Overview Culvert Design Considerations Hydraulic Terms Culvert Impacts Low vs High Gradient Design Low Gradient Culvert Design High Gradient Culvert Design

Culvert Hydraulics Terms Plunge pool Invert, Headwater (HW), Tailwater (TW) Headwater/Depth Ratio (HW/D): HW / pipe depth Supercritical Flow: high velocity, shallow water Subcritical Flow: low velocity, deep water

Aquatic Organism Passage Culvert Impacts Depth, Velocity and Exhaustion Barriers Jump Barriers

Sediment Sources Culvert Impacts Road Surface Erosion Frequent Failures Scour Embankment Erosion

Upstream Ponding Culvert Impacts on Channel Morphology Caused by culverts set too high or sediment deposits from frequent failures Result in stagnant water and upstream sediment deposition of muck, silt and sand Can increase water temperature

Culvert Design Methods Low Gradient: No Slope, Tailwater Control High Gradient: Stream Simulation

Low vs High Gradient Low Gradient = Tailwater Control Key Considerations Channel slope and bedform lengths Culvert length (fill ht, skew, side slope) Headcut potential (slope, channel type/material) Tailwater control Approximate Slope Breaks Low gradient < 0.3 percent High gradient > 1.0 percent

Water Surface Slope ~ 0.1% Low Gradient Low vs High Gradient

Water Surface Slope ~ 1.4% High Gradient Low vs High Gradient

All Good Culvert Designs Require: Complete Field Survey Stream profile Stream x-sec (2 up, 2 down) Road profile (and x-sec) Plan view sketch and/or topographic survey with total station Hydrologic Analysis Design flood flow (100-yr with HW/D<1, check 500-yr) Frequent flood flow (1.5 or 2-yr to check model accuracy) Fish passage flows (1 and 99% duration, ave daily flows) By-Pass flows during construction (ave monthly, median)

Culvert Size and Bankfull Width Low Gradient Culvert Design Bankfull Width Straight segment Narrow Unaffected by road crossing Bankfull Width - Riley Cr Example Min = 7.0 feet Mean = 9.2 feet Range = 7.0-11.5 feet, n=6 Select Culvert Width > BF Width Compare H&H Width to BF Width

Low Gradient Culvert Design Field Survey Hydrologic Analysis Select Invert Elevation (and Skew) Hydraulic Analysis - Model Flows Finalize Design

Culvert Skew Low Gradient Culvert Design Determine culvert skew Affects culvert length May affect stream profile

Culvert Elevation Low Gradient Culvert Design Set flat (on low gradient streams) Check profile for channel morphology impacts Consider channel adjustment and restoration Consider plunge pool and tailwater longevity Ensure tailwater will provide good depth and low velocity in culvert

Elevation (ft, local datum) Specify Invert Elevation Low Gradient Culvert Design 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 Riley Cr at FR 2161 Stream Thalweg Water Surface Road Surface Existing Culvert Invert Existing Culvert Top New Culvert 94-250 -200-150 -100-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Distance (ft)

Elevation (ft) Specify Culvert Elevation Low Gradient Culvert Design 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 Stream Water Road Culvert Invert New Culvert Invert 88-150 -100-50 0 50 100 150 200 Distance (ft)

Low Gradient Culvert Design Field Survey Hydrologic Analysis Select Invert Elevation (and Skew) Hydraulic Analysis - Model Flows Finalize Design

42 x29 CMP Profile Low Gradient Culvert Design Riley Cr at FR 2161 Example

87 x63 CMP Profile Low Gradient Culvert Design Riley Cr at FR 2161 Example Culvert 7.25 ft wide BF Widths: Min=7.0 ft Mean=9.2 ft Max=11.5 ft N=6

72 x54 CMP, Culvert Table Low Gradient Culvert Design Riley Cr at FR 2161 Example

Low Gradient Culvert Design Field Survey Hydrologic Analysis Select Invert Elevation (and Skew) Hydraulic Analysis - Model Flows Finalize Design

Finalize Design Low Gradient Culvert Design Culvert Elevation, Size, Type, Shape, Length and Skew Flood and fish passage flows Channel morphology Channel restoration Fill height and side slopes Stream-road alignment Road Construction Surfacing, low point, ditches, side slopes Erosion control: riprap, silt fence, by-pass, re-vegetation

Stream Simulation High Gradient Culvert Design Premise: provide a channel through the structure that will present no more of a challenge to organisms than the natural channel. (i.e., pass water, organic matter, sediment and aquatic organisms) How? Use a reference reach to guide design of a simulated channel through the structure 24

Stream simulation does not provide: Riparian functions especially bank vegetation Light Lateral channel and floodplain processes Passage of some aquatic, semi-aquatic or terrestrial organisms

Stream Simulation Design Process Assess stream simulation feasibility Examine profile and alignment Find reference reach Unstable channel Determine bed shape and material Define structure width, elevation, details Mobility / stability Design profile control Aggrading or alluvial fan

Suitable for stream simulation most sites in the midwest

Stream Simulation Design Process Assess stream simulation feasibility Examine profile and alignment ID reference reach Determine bed shape and material Define structure width, elevation, details Evaluate mobility/stability Design profile controls

Elevation (ft). Longitudinal Profile Phase 2: Pre-emption at FR 377 102.00 Preemption Cr at FR 377 Chequamegon-Nicolet NF 101.00 100.00 99.00 98.00 Existing Culvert 5.0' x 3.0' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 97.00 96.00 95.00 5 6 7 Bend 1.0% Bend w/ Some Wood (# 5) 94.00 93.00 92.00 3 4 2.3% Woody Debris (# 4) 91.00 90.00 89.00 88.00 87.00 86.00 1 Debris Jam (# 1) 2 2.4% Boulder Step and Log (# 2) Step at Base of Cobble/Boulder Cascade (# 3) Culvert Plunge Pool Stream Thalweg Water Surface Road Existing Culvert Invert Existing Culvert Top X-Section Locations 85.00-325 -300-275 -250-225 -200-175 -150-125 -100-75 -50-25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 Distance (ft)

Elevation (ft). Design Slope and Vertical Adjustment Potential Phase 3: Pre-emption at FR 377 102.00 Preemption Cr at FR 377 Chequamegon-Nicolet NF 101.00 100.00 99.00 98.00 Existing Culvert 5.0' x 3.0' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 97.00 96.00 95.00 5 6 7 Bend Bend w/ Some Wood (# 5) 94.00 93.00 92.00 3 4 Woody Debris (# 4) Ave Slope = 2.25% 91.00 90.00 2 Culvert Plunge Pool 89.00 88.00 87.00 86.00 1 Debris Jam (# 1) Boulder Step and Log (# 2) Step at Base of Cobble/Boulder Cascade (# 3) Stream Thalweg Water Surface Road Existing Culvert Invert Existing Culvert Top X-Section Locations 85.00-325 -300-275 -250-225 -200-175 -150-125 -100-75 -50-25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 Distance (ft)

Design profile control, transitions Stream Simulation Design Process Assess stream simulation feasibility Examine profile and alignment Find reference reach Determine bed shape and material Define structure width, elevation, details Mobility / stability

Selection of reference reach Represents stream type through crossing Gradient Width/depth Channel materials pebbles count and key pieces Bedforms Provides design parameters for stream simulation Out of influence of existing crossing Try to avoid very complex channels

Channel Cross-Sections 5-3 Phase 2: Pre-emption at FR 377

Design profile control, transitions Stream Simulation Design Process Assess stream simulation feasibility Examine profile and alignment Find reference reach Determine bed shape & material Define structure width, elevation, details Mobility / stability

Stream Bed Particle Sizes Duck Creek at Hwy 139 Particle size distribution from pebble count Perform pebble count Measure 10 key (largest) pieces Streambed mix from particle size distribution

Design profile control, transitions Stream Simulation Design Process Assess stream simulation feasibility Examine profile and alignment Find reference reach Determine bed shape & material Define structure width, elevation, details Mobility / stability

Structure type and width (width >BF to allow for bank rocks and floodplain) Bridge Box Pipe Arch Bottomless Arch Embedded Round

Structure Selection Phase 3: Pre-emption at FR 377 Options: 12 x8 5 Ellipse 9 x12 Concrete Box 12 3 Aluminum Box Invert Elevations: Up = 91.2 Center = 90.5 Down = 89.8 Bed Elevations: Up = 94.2 Center = 93.5 Down = 92.8 Fill Over Pipe = 3 ft

Stream Simulation Design Process Assess stream simulation feasibility Examine profile and alignment Find reference reach Determine bed shape & material Define structure width, elevation, details Sediment mobility/stability Design profile control, transitions

Sediment Mobility and Stability Hydraulic modeling (HEC-RAS) and modified critical sheer stress equation Primary Considerations: Key pieces must be stable: bank rocks, grade controls Simulation and reference bed mobilize at same flow If upstream replacement unlikely, need most of bed stable 40

Stream Simulation Design Process Assess stream simulation feasibility Examine profile and alignment Find reference reach Determine bed shape & material Define structure width, elevation, details Mobility / stability Design profile control, transitions

Profile control options grade controls rock bands Riffle or riffle/step structures Constructed with a band of primarily larger (D84-D100) size unsorted rocks. They help form channel cross-section and profile shape.

Elevation (ft). Design Profile: Culvert and Bed Elevations Phase 3: Pre-emption at FR 377 102.00 Preemption Cr at FR 377 Chequamegon-Nicolet NF 101.00 100.00 99.00 98.00 Existing Culvert 5.0' x 3.0' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 97.00 96.00 95.00 Streambed 5 6 7 Bend Bend w/ Some Wood (# 5) 94.00 93.00 92.00 91.00 90.00 89.00 88.00 87.00 86.00 1 Debris Jam (# 1) 2 3 Boulder Step and Log (# 2) 4 Step at Base of Cobble/Boulder Cascade (# 3) Culvert Plunge Pool Culvert Woody Debris (# 4) Ave Slope = 2.25% Stream Thalweg Water Surface Road Existing Culvert Invert Existing Culvert Top X-Section Locations 85.00-325 -300-275 -250-225 -200-175 -150-125 -100-75 -50-25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 Distance (ft)

Project Construction Duck Creek at Hwy 139 Painted bed and bank lines Walk behind front-end loader Streambed and bank rocks

Culvert Design Methods Low gradient: Set it low and let it flow! (No Slope -Tailwater Control) High gradient: Simulate the stream! (Stream Simulation)