Abstract. Introduction. Igor Ponjiger*, Dajana Lulić*, Milutin Kovačević**, Milan Malinić*** Received: August 2015 Accepted: September 2015

Similar documents
IMPACT OF HUNTING TOURISM ON SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

Position of WWF Mongolia Program Office on current situation of Argali hunting and conservation in Mongolia

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

Early History, Prehistory

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Monitoring Amur Leopards in Southwest Primorskii Krai, Russia

Sustainable use of wildlife in the context of the GIZ Regional Programme in Central Asia

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Island Fox A POPULATION IN TROUBLE T E A C H E R. Activity Overview

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

NEW MULTI-CRITERIA VALORIZATION OF HUNTING TOURISM DESTINATION

Native Species Restoration and its Impact on Local Populations

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

IUCN Guidelines for THOPHY HUNTING to promote conservation. Sandro Lovari

Mountain Gorillas. International Gorilla Conservation Program (IGCP) Mr. Stephen Asuma, IGCP Country Representative,Uganda.

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

021 Deer Management Unit

Chapter 14. Wildlife, Fisheries and Endangered Species. What are we Saving? Traditional Single-Species Wildlife Management

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

!!!!!!! Quarterly!Update!!Kordofan!giraffe!(Giraffa& camelopardalis&antiquorum),!garamba!national!park,! Democratic!Republic!of!Congo!!

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Crossing Corridors. Objective. Materials. Background Information

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Section 3: The Future of Biodiversity

Dallas Safari Club Auction of a Permit to Hunt a Namibian Black Rhino

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

ST HUBERTUS HUNTING TOURS

Classroom Activity: Population Study Game (Oh, Deer!)

Mountain Goat Horns Of The Kootenay Region Of British Columbia

Deer Management Unit 122

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

Threats to Biodiversity/Sustainability

Deer Management Unit 252

A Discussion on Conservation Strategies for Endangered Charismatic Megafauna

"Oh! Deer! & Limiting Factors" adapted from Project Wild Mr. Mark Musselman Audubon at the Francis Beidler Forest

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Furbearer Management Newsletter

Available online at ScienceDirect. Transportation Research Procedia 14 (2016 )

Marker, L. (2005). Aspects of ecology, biology and conservation strategies of Namibian farmland cheetahs. Animal Keeper's Forum 7/8.

Map Showing NAFO Management Units

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Deer Management Unit 152

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

Status and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois

BROWN BEAR MANAGEMENT IN SLOVENIA. Marko JONOZOVIČ, B.Sc. Slovenia Forest Service Head of Wildlife & Hunting Department

Law on the Conservation of Species and Biotopes

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Deer Management Unit 127

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

Trophy hunting & sustainability: Temporal dynamics in trophy size & harvesting patterns of wild herbivores

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Section 2: Biodiversity at Risk

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Wildlife poaching and trafficking Case of Kenya

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

A Threatened Bay: Challenges to the Future of the Penobscot Bay Region and its Communities

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology

RECONSTRUCTION OF ROADS ROAD TO SAFETY

Scuba diving in the Oosterschelde: Combining travel cost estimates with stated choice experiments

SOCIETAL GOALS TO DETERMINE ECOSYSTEM HEALTH: A FISHERIES CASE STUDY IN GALVESTON BAY SYSTEM, TEXAS

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

AmericAn PlAice. consultations on listing under the Species at Risk Act

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

The Barbary Serval. By: Dylan Crimm, Richard Kaminski, and Geno Pichorra

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Subject: Scoping Comments Ochoco Summit OHV Trail Project

At Risk Species. What do these have in common?

Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) District Councils (DCs) 27,924 km 2 (3.0% of Tanzania) 148 villages inhabited by 480,000 people. 21 registered WMAs

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Stakeholder Activity

Re: Consultation on the addition of narwhal and two bowhead whale populations to the SARA List

The Lesson of the Kaibab

A Level Threatened. Species Trail. Answers

Deer Management Unit 255

Memorandum of Understanding concerning. Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica tatarica)

2009 Update. Introduction

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION. Hunting, Trapping, and Fishing

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Chesapeake Bay Jurisdictions White Paper on Draft Addendum IV for the Striped Bass Fishery Management Plan

Transcription:

TURIZAM Volume 19, Issue 3 139 145 (215) Value of Chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra L.) Trophies as a Part of Hunting Tourism Offer in the National Park Tara (Serbia) Igor Ponjiger*, Dajana Lulić*, Milutin Kovačević**, Milan Malinić*** Received: August 215 Accepted: September 215 Abstract Chamois dispersion and population in Serbia today is relatively small in contrast to many suitable habitats across the country. One of the last stable populations can be found in the Tara Mountain. It is also one of the last places in Serbia where hunting tourists can hunt chamois. Considering that, it can be said that Tara chamois population can represent an important attracting factor for hunting tourists, both domestic and foreign. This paper analyses the significance of this population on the increase of variety of hunting tourism offer on TaraMountain, but also in Serbia. Also, the values of trophies realized through hunting tourism are analyzed in terms of keeping track of the demand, but also as a way to monitor the population so it remains preserved in the future. Key words: chamois, Rupicapra rupicapra, game trophy, hunting tourism, National park Tara Introduction Tara Mountain is located in the western part of Serbia, on the border with Bosnia and Herzegovina. It belongs to internal Dinarides and is a part of Serbian VlachMountains. Tara is a medium-high mountain with an average altitude of 1.2 meters and the highest peak, Kozji rid, 1,591 meters high. It is a typical forest area (over 85% of forest cover) with many endemic and endangered species (http://www.nptara.rs/). It was declared a National park in 1981 with total area of the park being 19.175 ha and a protected buffer zone around it of 37.584 ha. Within NP Tara we can differentiate two spatially-functional characteristic areas: High Tara (11.562 ha) and Flat Tara (7.613 ha) (Radović, 27). The focus of this paper is chamois, which is one of the symbols of National park Tara. It is a native species and inhabits mostly canyon parts of the rivers Rača, Derventa, Drina and Brusnica. Chamois are social animals that live in larger or smaller herds, led by the female. Adult * Society of Young Researchers of Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Branislav Bukurov Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21 Novi Sad. Corresponding author: ponjiger@yahoo.com ** Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel; Faculty of Sciences; University of Novi Sad; Dositej Obradović 3, 21 Novi Sad *** National Park Tara, MilenkaTopalovića 3, BajinaBašta, Serbia 139

Value of Chamois (Rupicaprarupicapra L.) Trophies as a Part of Hunting Tourism Offer in the National Park Tara (Serbia) males are separated from the herd rarely gather in small herds, mostly in winter. At the time of mating all herds are joining. Mating is in November and the first half of December when there s the start of a fight between males. Populations are fragile, being extremely cautious animals, due to disturbances such as hikers, predators and avalanches (Ristić, 213). Horns of chamois are very reputable trophy among hunters, since this is one of the craftiest and cautious animals, and also their habitat is often very hard to reach. The trophies itself are the horns along with the part of the skull, or a stuffed head also with horns. Both males and females have relatively short, straight horns which are curved backwards near the tip. Males usually have thicker horns, which are also more curved backwards and have bigger span than the ones of the females. Since both male and female individuals have horns that represent trophies, but are slightly different, there are separate categories for assigning medals according to the number of points (Ristić, 29). Table 1. Range of the number of points per medals Gender Bronze medal Silver medal Gold medal Male Chamois 1-14.99 15-19.99 11 Female Chamois 95-99.99 1-14.99 15 Source: Ristić, 29. Determining of the sex of the individual is important before the process of assessment of the trophy. Next, all of the elements are measured. Those are the lengths of each horn, height, girth of the wider horn and span. Also, there are additional points for age, and deducting points for resin on the horns. Summation of all the elements gives the final score of the trophy. The population in Tara is one of the last stable ones in Serbia. Therefore the status of the species on the national level is defined as VU (vulnerable). During the later half of the 2th century the population had many up and downs, up until the 21st century when finally it reached its peak and stays that way for over a decade (Gačić, et al., 21). Historically, chamois was a frequent type of game, especially in eastern and western part of Serbia. Due to constant harassment, and deforestation, especially after World War II, and also poaching and animal husbandry, chamois was slowly disappearing from its ancient habitats. Chamois as allochthonous species, survived only in the western part of Serbia, on the Tara mountain, mostly in the canyon of Drina river (Marinović, Ristić, 27) As can be seen in Figure 1 the population was in a very bad condition during the 196s when first counting of the population occurred. Proper managing has led to an increase in population during the next two decades. However, in the 199s the war in the neighboring Bosnia and Herzegovina, less than 1 kilometers from the National park, and poaching on a large scale led the population on the verge of survival, with only less than 1 individuals left. Since then the situation has improved drastically and the number has come close to its economic optimal number which is 38 according to Annual game management plan. Today the number of individuals is 37 according to the spring count in 215. According to Ristić (24) hunting tourism is considered as providing services for interested domestic or international hunting tourists, in order of organizing a visit to domestic hunting grounds for hunting, or observation and recording of game, with payment of certain compensation which is regulated in the pricelist of each hunting ground. On the other hand, hunting tourism returns a significant portion of revenues earned to the hunting ground, which for the most part later focuses on the production and protection of wild animals, ie. the introduction of at least the same number of the individuals of certain 14 TURIZAM Volume 19, Issue 3, 139 145 (215)

Igor Ponjiger, Dajana Lulić, Milutin Kovačević, Milan Malinić 5 Number of individuals (N) 4 3 2 1 196 197 198 1996 24 25 26 27 28 29 Year Figure 1. Dynamics of spring density of chamois population in the hunting ground Tara Source: Gačić, et al., 21. species of wildlife, as much as tourist hunting hunted. Part of funds gained through hunting tourism is directed at investments to improve the overall conditions for the implementation of hunting in hunting grounds (construction and maintenance of hunting-technical facilities, facilities for nutrition and accommodation of tourists, facilities for providing services for tourists in the hunting ground, transportation means and al.). Therefore, the main conclusion is that hunting tourism is the main generator of hunting (Štetić, 27). Methods and data The managing of hunting ground and National park is done by public company National park Tara. Its employees carry out the duties of monitoring and managing the wildlife. All of the data used in this paper were obtained from the professional service of the National park. Along with the Main hunting plan and Annual game management plans, the annual information about hunting quotas and game hunted through hunting tourism for the 26-215 period were also obtained. Trophies were measured in a standard way according to regulations of CIC (International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation) and 126 chamois were measured in the observed period. Methods used for the research consisted of collecting and analysing the data obtained from the professional service of the National park Tara and also from overview of the existing literature. Results and discussion Hunting tourism is one of the key factors in game management. Significant financial resources are being returned to the hunting ground this way. The main precondition for hunting tourism is a stable number of the game. As it was seen in Figure 1 the population number was steadily growing in the past decade. According to Annual game management plan for 215-216 hunting season chamoishas reached the number of 37 individuals in 215. This means that certain number of individuals can be offered through hunting tourism. TURIZAM Volume 19, Issue 3, 139 145 (215) 141

Value of Chamois (Rupicaprarupicapra L.) Trophies as a Part of Hunting Tourism Offer in the National Park Tara (Serbia) 25 Huntning bag per season 2 15 1 5 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 213/14 214/15 Figure 2. Hunting bag from 26 to 215 Hunting bag during the entire observed period was 126 individuals and the annual hunting bag can be seen in Figure 2. During nine hunting seasons, the number of hunted chamois reached its peak in 29/21 hunting season. Recent years show a certain decrease in overall hunting bag. During the observed period, nine hunting seasons, 126 chamois was hunted, of which 76 were male and 5 were female. The sex ratio of hunted animals is 1: 1.52 in male chamois favor. Even though more male chamois was hunted, the gender ratio remains in the acceptable limits, with the ratio being 1:1, 1 in female chamois favor, according to the spring count in 215. 39.68 % 6.32 % Male Female Figure 3. Ratio of hunted chamois by gender 142 TURIZAM Volume 19, Issue 3, 139 145 (215)

Igor Ponjiger, Dajana Lulić, Milutin Kovačević, Milan Malinić 2 15 Domestic International 1 5 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 213/14 214/15 Figure 4. Number and origin of hunting tourist in the hunting ground Tara Hunting tourism offer represents appropriate number of attractive game, hunting tourism services and goods, available for placement on the market, in order to please the need of hunting tourist for hunting of preferable game. Most important part of hunting tourism offer is the game, because it is the main motive for hunting tourists (Prentović, 26). Total number of hunting tourists during the observed period was 12. As it can be seen in Figure 4 larger part in the total number of tourists consists of domestic tourists. This can be attributed to the fact that the hunting ground still hasn t positioned itself on the international market. The following Figure 5 shows the average value of points of hunted chamois in hunting tourism from 26 to 215. As it can be seen in the graph, the average number of points for last 9 hunting seasons is almost identical. The lowest average value recorded is in the hunting 12 Average score Highest score Lowest score 1 8 6 4 2 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 213/14 214/15 Figure 5. Average number of points for trophies of hunted chamois from 26 to 215 TURIZAM Volume 19, Issue 3, 139 145 (215) 143

Value of Chamois (Rupicaprarupicapra L.) Trophies as a Part of Hunting Tourism Offer in the National Park Tara (Serbia) season 214/215, while the highest average value is recorded in season 213/214. The total average value of CIC points of hunted chamois is 83.24. As it can be seen from average values, foreign and domestic hunters prefer selective hunting in which points are not important. This kind of hunting makes significant financial income. Selective hunting in other European countries is practiced for a long time. Trophy hunting of wild game is mostly performed on the most valuable capital game with time of hunting should be kept in mind (just after mating) and scope of hunting, which must be done so that it does not later lead to a decline in the trophy value of game (Main hunting plan). Trophy hunting is usually done by members of the hunting association, or by hunting tourists. The overall volume of harvest is influenced by the real growth rate, above which hunting can t be realized, and also the possible migration that occur in the hunting ground. Except trophy hunting, this hunting ground also offers selective hunting. Selective cull represents reduction of game that has bad hereditary qualities, condition of health, trophy values, weight, fur color, physical appearance, behavior and other characteristics that differ from the normal state in hunting ground. Also, this is the way to control the population gender and age structure. Selective cull needs to be conducted in younger categories of game, in the case of chamois, prior to the fifth year. Individuals that are extracted from the population are ones with small horns and weak physique, and also ones with broken horns (Jevremović, Jovančić, 29). 5 4 Male Female 3 2 1 Bronze Silver Gold Figure 6. Overview of capital trophies of chamois in the observed period As far as capital trophy chamois, for the last nine hunting seasons in this hunting ground hunting tourists hunted six capital trophy male chamois, five in bronze and one in silver medal, and one female chamois in silver medal. Considering the fact that this population was on the decline until the end of the last century, the results displayed in this paper show that today the population is much more stable and in better condition. For the past three years a project Strengthening of biological capacities and technical infrastructure for reintroduction of chamois to suitable habitats in Serbia is being carried out on the territory of the hunting ground, so the results in that period need to be taken with reservations. The goal of the project is to capture and relocate certain number of individuals to habitats that chamois used to inhabit across Serbia. 144 TURIZAM Volume 19, Issue 3, 139 145 (215)

Igor Ponjiger, Dajana Lulić, Milutin Kovačević, Milan Malinić Conclusion The population of chamois in Tara today is stable and has recovered from severe decrease of population during the last decade of the 2th century. The work of the professional service is starting to show with the stable number of individuals in the population but also in the steady increase of the value of trophies for the past decade. Taking into account all of the facts, it can be said that the population is stable, but also vulnerable. Hunting tourism is declining, but this area still remains recognizable among hunting tourists, which are expected to continue to visit this destination. In the paper it was shown that the number of tourists fluctuates and that there is more domestic hunting tourist. Fact is that the population is still recovering and during the observed period progress can be seen in the number of game and also in the trophy value. In order to have even better results hunting ground Tara needs to position itself as one of the diverse hunting grounds and thus attract more tourists. As far as chamois population, hunting ground Tara has large national importance and needs to be managed sustainably. Acknowledgement We wish to express our gratitude to the National park Tara, especially the head of hunting service Milan Malinić, for providing us the necessary information and documents, and also for valuable advices and assistance during the writing of this paper. References Annual game management plan for 215-216 hunting seasonfor the Hunting ground Tara. (in Serbian) Gačić, D., Lavadinović, V., Bjedov, V., Malinić, M. (21). Chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra balcanica) management in the National park Tara, Forest ecosystems and climate changes, Belgrade. Jevremović, M., Jovančić, S. (29.) Hunting and wild game in hunting grounds of Serbia, Synopsis, Belgrade. (in Serbian) Main hunting plan of hunting ground Tara, valid 27-217. (in Serbian) Marinović, Lj.,Ristić Z. (27). Potential habitats for chamois in the mountain areas of Serbia, Turizam 11, 239-241. (in Serbian) Prentović, R. (26). Basics of hunting, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Novi Sad. (in Serbian) Radović, D. (27). Evolving GIS at Tara National Park (Serbia) Ristić, Z. (24). Feathered game as a part of hunting tourism offer of Vojvodina, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Novi Sad. (in Serbian) Ristić, Z. (29). Evaluation of hunting trophies, Sajnos, Novi Sad. (in Serbian) Ristić, Z. (213). Game zoology and hunting taxonomy, volume 1, IK Ljubostinja, Trstenik. (in Serbian) Štetić, S. (27). Special forms of tourism, Belgrade. (in Serbian) https://earth.google.com http://www.nptara.rs TURIZAM Volume 19, Issue 3, 139 145 (215) 145