B.A.I.T. Bass Anglers Information Team 6 Annual Report Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Fisheries Section 6 North Union Street Montgomery, Alabama 6
B.A.I.T. Bass Anglers Information Team 6 Annual Report By Damon Lee Abernethy Reservoir Management Biologist Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Funded in part by the Federal Aid to Sport Fish Restoration Program Alabama DJ/WB Project F-8
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......p. Methods....p. Summary...... p. Chapter. Club Tournament Results.p.6 Results and Discussion....p.7 Tables Table. Statewide summary of tournaments for bass clubs participating in the 6 B.A.I.T. Program...p. Table. Ranking by quality indicators for all reservoirs with five or more tournament reports in the 6 B.A.I.T. Program.....p. Table. Tournament summary for bass clubs participating in the 6 B.A.I.T. Program.......p.5 Table. Clubs supporting the 6 B.A.I.T. annual report...p.6 Table 5. Bass eight pounds and larger from 6 B.A.I.T. data...p.7 Figures Figure. Annual catch for B.A.I.T. tournaments... p.8 Figure. Annual quality indicators for Coffeeville, Demopolis, and Eufaula Reservoirs through 6...p.9 Figure. Annual quality indicators for Gainesville, Guntersville, and Harding Reservoirs through 6...p. Figure. Annual quality indicators for Harris, Jones Bluff, and Jordan Reservoirs through 6...p. Figure 5. Annual quality indicators for Lay, Logan Martin, and Martin Reservoirs through 6 p. Figure 6. Annual quality indicators for Miller s Ferry and Mitchell Reservoirs, and the Mobile Delta through 6. p. Figure 7. Annual quality indicators for Neely Henry, Pickwick, and Smith Reservoirs through 6...p. Figure 8. Annual quality indicators for Warrior, Weiss, and West Point Reservoirs through 6...p.5 Figure 9. Annual quality indicators for Wheeler and Wilson Reservoirs through 6.. p.6 i
Chapter. Professional and Semi-professional Tournament Trail Results...p.7 Results and Discussion..p.8 Mobile Delta...........p.8 Eufaula........ p.8 Guntersville........... p.9 Neely Henry........... p.9 Pickwick......... p. Smith.......... p. West Point.......... p. Wheeler.......... p. Tables Table 6. Bass tournament statistics from the Mobile Delta during 6..p. Table 7. Bass tournament statistics from Eufaula during 6...p. Table 8. Bass tournament statistics from Guntersville during 6..p. Table 9. Bass tournament statistics from Neely Henry during 6.....p.5 Table. Bass tournament statistics from Pickwick during 6...p.6 Table. Bass tournament statistics from Smith during 6..p.7 Table. Bass tournament statistics from West Point during 6...p.8 Table. Bass tournament statistics from Wheeler during 6..p.9 Table. Bass tournament trail statistics from all Alabama reservoirs during 6..p. Acknowledgements.. p. ii
INTRODUCTION The printing of the 6 B.A.I.T. annual report marks the twenty-first year of the B.A.I.T. program. The objective of the program since its inception has been to gather information on bass populations by combining the efforts of bass club members and state fisheries biologists. The B.A.I.T. program summarizes catch data on reservoir bass populations that are collected and provided to us by participating clubs. This information is used by state fisheries biologists in combination with data from other sources as a basis for fisheries management decisions. Bass anglers use the report to establish future tournament sites or to locate a reservoir that provides a particular type of fishing. Through 6, we have summarized,7 tournament reports. Anglers have spent,5,8 hours collecting data for this program. They have contributed data from 58,89 bass that weighed 9,66 pounds. Beginning with this report, we have included an analysis of the larger trail-type tournaments, which will be reported in Chapter. Trail tournaments will be analyzed and reported separately in a second chapter due to inherent differences between trail and club tournaments. While a single trail tournament can sometimes provide huge amounts of data (often approaching 9 angler-days), they are also subject to biases that when used collectively, club tournament data are not. These biases may include weather events, water levels, or time of year, which could significantly alter the results of an analysis that included one very large tournament that may have taken place on a particularly good or bad day. Actual fishing time (effort) is also difficult to discern because of staggered weigh-ins which are a necessity when competitors are flighted for blast-off in the mornings. METHODS Chapter - Club Tournaments Every year we attempt to maintain the support of the previous year s clubs and to enlist the support of new clubs through public meetings, news releases and letters. Participating club officers or tournament directors are sent the previous year s annual report, with tournament report postcards to be completed following each tournament. Clubs are assigned individual numbers to insure confidentiality. As tournament cards are received, they are checked for accuracy and entered into a computer database. Club officers are contacted when data are suspected to be erroneous. We compile and analyze the data following receipt of December tournament reports. Statewide tournament results are sorted by reservoir and by club.
To rank reservoirs, five fishing quality indicators were used: percent of successful anglers (percent of anglers with one or more bass at weigh-in), average bass weight, number of bass per angler-day, pounds of bass per angler-day, and hours required to catch a bass five pounds or larger. Since the length of a fishing day varies between tournaments, an angler-day is defined as hours of fishing effort. A minimum of five tournaments for an individual reservoir is considered necessary for minimum confidence in each reservoir dataset. Reservoirs with five or more tournament reports are ranked for each of the quality indicators. Values are assigned to each rank and an overall rank is determined for each reservoir by summing the values of the five quality indicators. This ranking system is intended to be a quick reference for club tournament site selection. It does not constitute a best and worst list of Alabama reservoirs and should not be interpreted that way. Chapter - Trail Tournaments This section of the report is also intended to aid clubs in scheduling tournaments since the quality of fishing can vary considerably from one season to the next on any given reservoir. It also allows anglers to better understand their chances of winning or receiving a check in a high profile tournament on a given lake by studying in detail how anglers performed during previous tournaments. When studying this section of the report, be aware that some results are from team tournaments, draw tournaments, Pro/Am s, etc., and that catch rates can be quite variable depending upon the format. Trail tournament reports are provided to help anglers answer those questions, and to a much lesser degree, help describe individual bass fisheries. There are several reasons why these large tournaments are not included with the traditional B.A.I.T. report in chapter one. Their biggest shortcoming is that anglers sometimes have a tendency not to weigh in if they know they are not going to earn a check; thus, these tournaments do not provide accurate statistics about the numbers and weight of fish actually caught during the tournament. These tournaments are not included in the club-level statistics because many of them are Pro/Am tournaments, where the amateur angler is severely handicapped because they are essentially an observer who is allowed to fish, but have no right choose areas or tactics. These anglers are particularly disadvantaged in the spring when bed fishing is so popular. Furthermore, in some cases, trail tournaments may require amateur anglers to weigh in less than five fish, which impacts many of the statistics calculated in this report. In Chapter (the traditional B.A.I.T. report), an angler-day is equal to ten hours; however, in this section, an angler-day is equal to one competition day (about 8.5 hours). This
distinction is made because it is difficult to calculate actual time fished because larger tournaments use flights and a staggered weigh in. It also differs from club reports in that it does not include the number of bass over five pounds, simply because of the number of anglers participating. For lakes where there are ten or more trail tournaments, detailed statistics are calculated and are broken down by month. The last money weight is the weight caught by the angler who received the last check. Checks are usually issued to the competitors with total weights in the top % of the field. SUMMARY In general, 6 was one of the best years for bass fishing in the state of Alabama since the largemouth bass virus swept through the state in 998. Although most statewide quality indicators slipped slightly below 5 levels, last year was still among the best years since this program s inception in 986, with the number and pounds of bass per angler-day approaching all-time highs. The following summary outlines the most important points from the 6 B.A.I.T. report. Jordan top lake in the overall quality indicator rankings Jordan, Lay, Guntersville, Harris, Eufaula, Demopolis, and Wheeler Lakes that improved in the overall quality indicator rankings Jordan, Weiss, Lay, Logan Martin, and Aliceville Top five lakes in the overall quality indicator rankings Guntersville, West Point, Aliceville, Eufaula, and Weiss Top five big bass lakes in Alabama.7 Number of bass caught per angler-day.8 Pounds of bass caught per angler-day.8 Average weight of bass caught 7 Hours required to catch a bass over 5 pounds. Weight of the largest bass caught 7 Number of bass 8 pounds and larger 8 Number of bass 5 pounds and larger
Black Warrior and Tombigbee River Systems o Fishing improved system wide in 6 o Each reservoir maintained or showed an increase in average weight of bass, bass per angler-day, and pounds per angler-day o Smith The average winning weight was. pounds The heaviest five fish limits were caught in March The biggest bass were caught in January Alabama River System o Fishing generally declined in 6 o Moderate decrease in number and pounds of bass caught per angler-day o Average weight of bass remained fairly constant Coosa River System o Showed the greatest improvement of all major river systems o Three year trend of increasing catch rates and total pounds weighed in o Many lakes approached or exceeded their previous year peaks Chattahoochee River System o Fishing was more variable than on most river systems o Quality of fishing continues to decline at Harding o Spotted bass on the rise o West Point Big bass averaged 6.9 pounds The heaviest five fish limits were caught in May Most competitors caught more and bigger fish from Mar.-Apr. o Eufaula Average winning weight was.86 pounds Catch rates were best (8%) from Jan.-Feb. Average weight of bass varied little throughout the year Tallapoosa River System o Provided excellent fishing o Average weight of bass remained small o Catch rates have skyrocketed during the last three years
Tennessee River System o Fishing has declined slightly, but is still excellent o Catch-rates are lower o Still very few big bass in Wheeler o Guntersville is better than ever It took at least pounds to win 7 of tournaments from Jan. Mar. Big bass exceeded 8 pounds in 6 of tournaments from Jan. Mar. Catch rates were highest in April (9%) o Wheeler Average winning weight was. pounds It took at least 8.98 pounds to receive a check Catch rates were highest in May (95%) o Pickwick Average weight of bass was only five ounces below its year peak number of bass caught per angler-day was among the lowest ever average winning weight was.7 pounds Catch rates were highest in June 5
CHAPTER CLUB TOURNAMENTS 6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Bass clubs submitted 6 tournament reports during 6, decreasing from the 9 received in 5 (Tables and ). Club representatives did an excellent job filling out the cards and few reports were rejected due to incomplete or erroneous information. We want to again, thank all of the participants of the B.A.I.T. program and urge them to keep up the good work! Thirty four Alabama clubs provided data in 6. Two hundred and two reports from Alabama waters were received from Dr. Carl Quertermus of the University of West Georgia, who summarizes tournament data from the Georgia Bass Federation, and another reports were received from Biologist, Larry Pugh, with the Mississippi Division of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks. Without their support, several Alabama reservoirs would not have been well represented in the quality indicator rankings (Table ). Once again we must stress that reports from more locations increase the capability of the summaries to reflect actual fish population conditions and not just a good or poor day's fishing by one or two clubs. In 6, tournament reports were received for 9 bodies of water that were fished 87,965 hours. B.A.I.T. anglers caught,888 bass that weighed 7,65 pounds (Table ). A total of 8 bass five pounds and larger were reported for an overall catch rate of one bass five pounds or larger for every 7 hours of fishing. Tournament anglers weighed in 7 bass eight pounds and larger in 6 (Table 5). The largest bass caught in 6 came from Lake Guntersville and weighed. pounds. With 5 bass weighing five pounds or larger, Guntersville led this category. Other top lakes for big bass included West Point, Aliceville, Eufaula, and Weiss. Of the 5 clubs or organizations that submitted data during 6, 6 submitted five or more tournament reports. Twelve clubs submitted or more reports. Eleven contributors submitted only one report. All club representatives should understand that every tournament report is important if this program is to continue being successful. A list of clubs contributing tournament results for the 6 B.A.I.T. report is presented in Table. Average catch rates in 6 for both number (.7) and pounds (.8) of bass per angler-day were similar to 5, and were above their respective -year averages. Compared to 5, seven lakes improved in overall fishing success in 6. The most notable improvements were on Jordan and Lay Lake, which finished st and rd, respectively, in the overall ranking (Table ). Improvements on these lakes were a direct result of an increase in the numbers of fish caught rather than an increase in fish size. More tournament reports in 6 were received from Eufaula (5), Guntersville (), and West Point (6). Logan Martin, Martin, the Mobile Delta, Pickwick, and Weiss each had or 7
more tournament reports (Table ). A good distribution of reports provides more representative catch statistics from which meaningful summaries can be prepared. All club representatives should understand that every tournament report is important if this program is to continue to be successful. Of the 9 reservoirs from which reports were received, had five or more tournament reports (Table ). The following comments deal with these reservoirs, which are ranked by quality indicators in Table. The percent of successful anglers (those with one or more fish) ranged from 9% at Smith to over 9% at Logan Martin. The average weight of bass caught ranged from. pounds at Harding to.76 pounds at Guntersville (Table ). Catch rates expressed as bass per angler-day ranged from.56 at Pickwick to.9 at Logan Martin. Catch rates as pounds per angler-day ranged from.78 at Harding to 7.56 at Jordan. The statewide average weight for bass caught on all 9 reservoirs was.8 pounds. Overall, Lake Jordan accumulated more quality indicator points (8) than any other reservoir in Alabama, replacing Weiss from 5. Weiss (75) fell to second while Lay Lake (7) jumped from ninth to third. Readers should note that the primary intent of Table was not to determine the overall best reservoir, but to characterize the fishery of each reservoir. Anglers should first review the quality indicator that is most important to them. The overall rating would be used to narrow choices. For example, if an angler wanted to have the best chance to catch a bass greater than 5 pounds, then Guntersville would be the first choice, followed by West Point and Aliceville. Clubs interested in having all its members catch good quality stringers would look at the pounds per angler-day rankings to find that Lakes Jordan, Logan Martin, and Lay lead the way. If catching lots of bass is important, Logan Martin would provide the best opportunity based upon its bass per angler-day ranking, followed by Lakes Harris, Jordan, and Martin. Bass data as expressed in the B.A.I.T. report from reservoirs with harvest restrictions or length limits will be biased since the data is a function of the restrictions. Length limits are imposed to increase the number of fish below a minimum length or within a specified length range (slot limit) which should eventually result in a greater supply of bass above the limit. Because all minimum lengths and length ranges will be above the -inch limit fished in most tournaments, the restrictions will reduce the total harvest in numbers and possibly pounds. However, those fish weighed in will be larger (longer) by virtue of the minimum length or slot limit. In the B.A.I.T. report, length limit lakes should rank high for average weight and near the bottom for percent success and bass per angler-day. For instance, bass per angler-day averaged.7 statewide in 6 but for Guntersville it was.6. Statewide average weight was 8
.8 pounds for all 9 reservoirs but at Eufaula, Demopolis, and Guntersville, average weight was.9,., and.76 pounds, respectively. These average weights were higher primarily because anglers must release the smaller fish due to the minimum length limits. Length limits remained in effect during 6 on West Point (-inch minimum on largemouth bass), Wilson (-inch minimum on smallmouth bass), Guntersville (5-inch minimum on all black bass), Eufaula (-inch minimum on largemouth bass), Demopolis (- inch minimum on all black bass), Pickwick (-inch minimum on smallmouth bass), Little Bear Creek (-6 inch slot on largemouth bass), and Smith (-5 inch slot on all black bass). During April 6, the Lake Harris slot limit was modified from -6 inches for all black bass to -6 inches on largemouth bass only. The quality of fishing on the Black Warrior and Tombigbee River lakes all improved in 6, with each reservoir maintaining or showing an increase in average weight of bass, bass per angler-day, and pounds per angler-day. Interestingly, of the six reservoirs from which reports were received, all showed an increase in the number of bass caught per angler-day, which was reflected in the overall average total weight per angler-day. At Demopolis, the two most important quality indicators to anglers (pounds and number of bass per angler-day) increased in 6, while average weight of bass has remained fairly constant since 996. Recruitment and growth rates of largemouth bass at Demopolis have fallen since. Warrior reservoir also showed marked improvements in average weight of bass (.6 pounds), number of bass per angler-day (.7 fish), and pounds per angler-day (.7 pounds). Fishing in the Alabama River lakes declined in 6, with both Jones Bluff and Millers Ferry showing moderate decreases in number of bass caught per angler-day and pounds perangler-day, while average weight of bass in those reservoirs remained fairly constant. The Coosa River lakes showed the greatest improvement in bass fishing during 6. A three year trend of increasing catch rates (bass per angler-day) and total pounds weighed in (pounds per angler-day) was evident in most lakes, and many of them approached or exceeded their previous year peaks. However, average weigh of bass declined in five of six Coosa River lakes, most notably Neely Henry (down %). Logan Martin surpassed its previous maximums for bass per angler-day by % and pounds per angler-day by %. Lake Jordan was even more impressive, exceeding its previous year peaks by % and % for bass per angler-day and pounds per angler-day, respectively. Fishing on the Chattahoochee River system in 6 was more variable than on most river systems in Alabama. At Eufaula, average weight of bass has shown a slow but steady decrease from. pounds in 99 to.9 pounds in 6. However, the number of bass 9
caught per angler-day on Eufaula has generally increased since 999, resulting in an increase in pounds per angler-day from. pounds in 999 to.7 pounds in 6. The quality of fishing in Lake Harding continued its decline in 6, with average bass weight, number of bass per angler-day, and pounds of bass per angler-day all falling to near record lows. Although average weight of bass in West Point Lake has been declining since the late 98 s, the number caught by anglers (bass per angler-day) has shown an increase during the same time period. Because of the increase in number of fish caught, West Point bass anglers weighed in a record number of pounds per angler-day in 5 and then broke that record again in 6. Recent changes in the West Point bass fishery can be attributed largely to the fact that its fertility level has declined making it more suitable for the aggressive spotted bass, which have begun to dominate the fishery. Reservoirs on the Tallapoosa River system provided excellent fishing in 6. Although average weight of bass remained fairly constant on both Harris and Martin as it has for the last years, catch rates (number of bass per angler-day) have skyrocketed during the last three years, approaching or exceeding previous peaks achieved last year on Harris and in 99 on Lake Martin. Lake Harris has been experiencing drastic improvements since 999 with all quality indicators improving each year since. However, the large increases in number and pounds of bass per angler-day in 6 are a direct result of lifting of the -6 inch slot limit on spotted bass, which artificially inflated both quality indicators. With the exception of Guntersville, fishing in the Tennessee River system declined somewhat in 6. Although anglers caught fewer and smaller bass from Wheeler in 6 than in 5, the fishery is near its year norm for average bass weight, number of bass per angler-day, and pounds per angler-day. However, Wheeler Lake was hit very hard by the largemouth bass virus in 998 and has never recovered; in fact there was not a bass over five pounds caught by B.A.I.T. clubs during 6. During the eleven years prior to the virus, it took fishermen an average of 95 hours to catch a bass over five pounds, while it has taken them an average of,76 hours during the eight years since the virus. The average size bass caught by B.A.I.T. anglers in Wilson has declined during the last three years from.6 pounds to. pounds. However, anglers are catching three times as many bass than they did during the late 99 s and early s when catch rates were around fish per angler-day. Wilson bass anglers caught.8 pounds of bass per angler-day in 6, the second best weight for any year since 986. This was due in part to the removal of the -inch minimum size limit on largemouth bass and spotted bass in. Since, the already excellent bass fishery at Lake Guntersville has continued to improve. All five quality indicators showed improvement and
have approached or exceeded their year maximums. The length limit on smallmouth bass in Pickwick is continuing to help sustain an excellent fishery for this species. The average weight of Pickwick bass in 6 was. pounds, only five ounces below its year peak in 998. However, the number of bass caught per angler-day was among the lowest during the same time period, resulting in near average number of pounds per angler-day. In general, 6 was one of the best years for bass fishing in the state of Alabama since the largemouth bass virus swept through the state in 998. Although most statewide quality indicators slipped slightly below 5 levels, last year was still among the best years since the B.A.I.T. Program s inception in 986, with the number and pounds of bass per angler-day approaching all-time highs. A trend that first appeared in the 998 B.A.I.T. data that has been a major concern ever since is the dramatic decrease in angler s catch rate of bass over five pounds from reservoirs throughout the State. The average number of hours (effort) needed to catch a five-pound and larger bass dramatically increased beginning in 998 and reached its peak of 87 the following year. From 999 through 5, the amount of effort has steadily decreased from 87 hours to hours (Figure ). However, in 6, it increased to 7 hours of fishing effort to catch a bass five pounds and larger or about % more effort than it took prior to 998. Although there was a recent increase, it appears now that this trend is continuing to show improvement. The decrease in large fish in Alabama occurred regardless of the river system, reservoir size, reservoir location, or type of management. Regionally this phenomenon was also documented in Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. It is now generally accepted among fisheries biologists and researchers that this decrease in the number of larger fish being caught by anglers can be attributed largely to the impact on bass populations of the Largemouth Bass Virus Disease (LMBV). Although there have been no recent outbreaks, we are continuing to cooperate with researchers at Auburn University and other agencies to assess the presence of this virus in Alabama bass populations and to monitor any further fish mortalities caused by this pathogen. The decreasing amount of effort required to catch large bass in Alabama since 999 is a hopeful trend and this has been interpreted by many of the researchers monitoring this disease as an indication that our bass populations are beginning to adapt to this new pathogen. There are still indications that this disease is continuing to impact our bass populations by elevating natural mortality rates above what was observed prior to its introduction, but it is hoped that in time our bass populations will develop a greater resistance to this disease. In addition, fisheries management biologists and fisheries pathologists from across the country are now working together to learn more about this disease as quickly as possible in hopes of
determining strategies to minimize its impact on our largemouth bass fisheries. To aid us in this effort please report any unusual bass die-offs to your district fisheries office and never move fish from one body of water to another. Graphs in Appendix A provide a historical record of how your favorite waters have performed in the B.A.I.T. program. A few words of caution, these graphs are not restricted to bodies of water with five or more tournaments. Data points for some years may be represented by only a few tournaments. However, those situations are restricted to those water bodies that generally have not been included in the quality indicator rankings in Table. Secondly, when comparing water bodies, be aware that the scales on the vertical axes have maximum ranges that vary. You can use these graphs to predict future fishing by looking for trends. Good luck fishing and don t forget to take a child with you and introduce him or her to your sport. Our children are our future anglers and stewards of Alabama s resources. To obtain more information on Alabama s fisheries resources visit the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Internet Homepage: www.outdooralabama.com
Table. Statewide summary of tournaments for bass clubs participating in the 6 B.A.I.T. Program. Number of Number of Anglers with Number of Total Number of Total Percent Average Bass per Pounds per Hours per Reservoir Tournaments Anglers a Fish Bass Weight Bass > 5 lbs. Hours Success Weight Angler-day Angler-day Bass > 5 lbs. Aliceville 666 5. 7.5 7.59.. 5. 7 Cedar Creek 5. 95....7.7 95 Claiborne 7 6 7. 5. 58.8..7. Coffeeville 8 7 9 8. 7 6. 9..65..68 88 Demopolis 8 85 6 6 9.8 9 8.5 57.9...5 Eufaula 5 69 5 9 78.7 685.5 7.89.9.78.7 78 Gainesville 6 5 6 8.6 6.5 8.5.6.5.6 6 Guntersville 58 6 96 658.8 5 589. 68.75.76.6.5 6 Harding 6 88 56. 86. 75.7..9.78 6 Harris 6 59 777.5 78. 87..7.8 5.6 78 Holt 86 6 6.6 8. 76.79.8.5. 8 Jones Bluff 7 8 75 98.9 96.5 69..66.57.6 68 Jordan 8 7 9 76. 6.5 9...7 7.56 5 Lay 58 5 85. 5. 89..66. 5.67 5 Logan Martin 8 7 9 8 76.6 6 67.5 9.59.5.9 5.99 77 Martin 8 7 98 7 7. 787. 89..7.6.96 596 Millers Ferry 8 98 69 999. 7 966. 6.6.6.9.7 Mitchell 9 7 9 66. 96.5 8.5.58..75 97 Mobile Delta 8 86 9 89.6 695. 8.5.5.9.7 88 Neely Henry 7 8 65 99..8 89..5.9.7 Pickwick 8 57 55 8 6888. 8 5. 57.9..56. 7 Smith 5 9 9 75 9.6 7.5 8.98.8.7.9 Tuscaloosa 5 5 9. 9. 8...7.88 9 Warrior 78 59 76 89. 776. 75.6.6.7.7 88 Weiss 8 69 6 9 576. 66. 88.7.78. 5.5 West Point 6 58 6 87 859.8 9 699. 79.8.55.9.5 7 Wheeler 9 57 667. 79.5 7.6.55..7 Wilson 8 8.6 7....6.8 Yates 8 7.9...56.8 7.9 Grand Total 6 9 659 888 765.8 8 8796.8 7.9.8.7.8 7
Table. Ranking by quality indicators for all reservoirs with five or more tournament reports in the 6 B.A.I.T. Program. Percent Average Bass per Pounds per Hours per Rank Success Weight Angler-day Angler-day Bass > 5 lbs. Overall Value Logan Martin Guntersville Logan Martin Jordan Guntersville Jordan 8 Jordan Demopolis Harris Logan Martin West Point Weiss 75 Neely Henry Pickwick Jordan Lay Aliceville Lay 7 Lay Aliceville Martin Harris Eufaula Logan Martin 7 5 Martin Eufaula Lay Weiss Weiss Aliceville 67 6 Weiss Jordan Weiss Aliceville Demopolis West Point 6 7 Harris Smith Mitchell Martin Pickwick Guntersville 57 8 Mitchell Weiss West Point Mitchell Millers Ferry Harris 57 9 Mobile Delta Lay Neely Henry West Point Jones Bluff Mitchell 5 West Point Jones Bluff Jones Bluff Demopolis Lay Eufaula 5 Harding Millers Ferry Aliceville Guntersville Jordan Demopolis 5 Eufaula Mitchell Wheeler Neely Henry Harding Martin 5 Wheeler Wheeler Mobile Delta Jones Bluff Logan Martin Neely Henry 5 Aliceville West Point Millers Ferry Eufaula Smith Jones Bluff 8 5 Jones Bluff Mobile Delta Harding Wheeler Neely Henry Pickwick 6 Guntersville Neely Henry Demopolis Pickwick Mitchell Millers Ferry 8 7 Millers Ferry Logan Martin Eufaula Millers Ferry Harris Wheeler 8 Pickwick Harris Smith Mobile Delta Martin Mobile Delta 9 Demopolis Martin Guntersville Smith Mobile Delta Harding 7 Smith Harding Pickwick Harding Wheeler Smith 7
Table. Tournament summary for bass clubs participating in the 6 B.A.I.T. Program. Number of Number of Anglers with Number of Total Number of Total Percent Average Bass per Pounds per Hours per Club No. Tournaments Anglers a Fish Bass Weight Bass > 5 lbs. Hours Success Weight Angler-day Angler-day Bass > 5 lbs. 5 7 7 5.. 6.67.67.5.75 9 99 55. 6. 79..57.. 6 5 8. 6 5.5 8.6.59.76.7 87 5 5 58.6 5. 8...9.5 5 6 8 5 8 78. 86. 7.9.9.5 5.5 88 7 7 5.6 6. 8.5.5.68 8.8 6 8 9 56.. 9.86..8 5. 9 6 9 7. 6. 5...99.85 9 59.5 6.5 7.9.8.. 7 6 8 87.6 78. 5..7. 6. 78 9 9 79 75.8 99. 8.89.58.7. 9 6 65 5 9. 6. 8.8.57.9. 6 5 8 8 7 7....5 5.69.8 5 6 8 96 65 6 5. 5. 67.7.57.5. 57 7 9 66 75 85.5 87.5 58..6..7 87 8 6 9.. 66.67.9.8.5 9 59 6 6. 78.5 5.97.87.6.7 96 7 55 9. 89. 79.9.66.88.77 89 6 55 8. 5. 8.77.8.8. 8 6 6. 7. 56.79..7.8 6.5 9. 8.6..86.79 7 68 77.8 99. 86..65.5.87 997 5 5 9 687.. 87..68.58 6. 6 8 56 5.6 6. 7...67.7 6 7 95 7 688 9.6 58..9.88.9.6 76 8 8 7. 68. 5.6.56.8.8 68 9 8 7 666. 98. 9.57.69.6 5.68 66 87 6 9. 878. 86..6.8.7 9 9 8 8 56 95. 79. 96..9.56 6.89 6 8 765. 7 7. 8.6.9.99 7. 6 6 8 68. 69.5 9..9. 6. 86 6 97 55.9 97 78. 8.5.65.7.5 8 5 6 58 686 8. 5 85. 59...66.66 7 Grand Total 6 9 659 888 765.8 8 8796.8 7.9.8.7.8 7 5
Table. Clubs supporting the 6 B.A.I.T. annual report. CLUB NAME ADDRESS CITY ST ZIP REPRESENTATIVE PHONE ARK OF FAYETTE SW WASHINGTON ST. DEMOPOLIS AL 67 WADE REESE -87-5 BALDWIN COUNTY BASSMASTERS CO. RD. FAIRHOPE AL 65 LARRY YOUNG 5-98-5 BAY AREA BASSMASTERS 88 MICHIGAN AVE FAIRHOPE AL 65 ELMER VICK 5-98-76 BLACK WARRIOR BASS TRACKERS 55 SUMMERFIELD DR E TUSCALOOSA AL 5 CHARLIE TIDMORE 5-55-99 BLUFF CITY BASSMASTERS 5 FIVE MILE RD. EUFAULA AL 67 JIM HOWARD -66-6956 BOEING BASS CLUB 6555 LAMBERT ROAD ELKMONT AL 65 JOANTHAN MANTEUFFEL 56--867 CENTRAL TENNESSEE BASS CLUB 5 GREENLAND DR. FRANKLIN TN 769 DANNY SUTTON 65-77-77 COOSA LODGE 6 P.O.BOX 5 COOSA GA 9 CELL RAMEY 76-766-558 DEMOPOLIS H.S. F.F.A. 7 HWY 8 W. DEMOPOLIS AL 67 CLIFTON McNIGHT -89-9 EAST COBB BASS PROS 555 KINGS COUNTY CT. ALPHARETTA GA STEVE GALBRAITH -5-8 FAYETTE BASS CLUB COLUMBUS ST. E FAYETTE AL 5555 DANA BEAVERS 5-9-775 FIVE FLAGS BASS CLUB 77 MUSCODA ST. PENSACOLA FL 56 WAYNE LASSITTER 85-9-99 GEORIGA BASS FEDERATION CARROLLTON GA 8 DR. CARL QUERTERMUS 678-89-5 GILBERTOWN BASS CLUB P.O. BOX 8 GILBERTOWN AL 698 MIKE THORN 5-8-668 HAWG MASTERS 8 CO ROAD 656 HANCEVILLE AL 577 PHILLIP BRISCOE 56-5-99 I.L.B.C. BASS TRAIL 85 WATERMELLON RD. NORTHPORT AL 57 SAM DAVIS 5-75-7 KOWALIGA 7 N. ANN AVE. TALLASSEE AL 678 HANK GOLDEN -8-67 LAKE GUNTERSVILLE BASSMASTERS 8 LITTLE DR SW HARTSELLE AL 56 PHIL EKEMA 56-75-656 MAGNOLIA BASS CLUB 595 U.S. HWY CUBA AL 697 MICHAEL DENNIS 5-9- MISSISSIPPI WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, & PARKS 7 CO. RD. 995 TUPELO MS 88 LARRY PUGH 66-8-57 MOBILE BASSMASTERS 95 GOVERNMENT BLVD. MOBILE AL 669 BOB STEELE 5-66-96 OUTCASTERS BASS CLUB 75 CO. RD. 68 SECTION AL 577 BIG STEVE TURNER 56-57-59 PEMCO BASS CLUB 8 MARIGOLD AVE. BIRMINGHAM AL 57 FRED YOUNG 5-66-899 PINE LEVEL BASSMASTERS 6 FOXDALE RD. MILLBROOK AL 65 RICKY BENTON -85-9 PIPEMILL BASSMASTERS 5 SPRING TRAIL WARRIOR AL 58 BILLY J. LAWSON 5-67-87 PRATTVILLE BASS ANGLERS 6 REGENT CT. PRATTVILLE AL 666 D.L. ABERNETHY --999 RED BIRD BASS 6 LAWNWOOD DR. MONTGOMERY AL 68 LEE ZEIGLER -8-9 RIVER CITY CLASSIC 875 CO RD GALLION AL 67 JOHN McALPINE -89-589 RIVER CITY OPEN 77 BARLEY ST DEMOPOLIS AL 67 GREGG McPHERSON -89-99 SEMMES SOUTHERN COMFORT BASS CLUB 575 PONDEROSA DRIVE SEMMES AL 6575 DANNY HEATHCOE 5-69-95 SMITH LAKE DAM TOURNAMENT 769 CO. RD. 9 CRANE HILL AL 55 WAYNE COLE 56-77-755 TMT ANGLERS LEACH DR. BIRMINGHAM AL 5 LANCE GRANGER TRI-RIVERS BASS CLUB 5 DUSTY TRAILS DEATSVILLE AL 6 DAN SPIRES -6-878 WEST ALABAMA BASS FISHERMANS ASSN. P.O. BOX GORDO AL. 566 JEFF GILLIAM 5-6-85 WESTSIDE BASS CLUB 8 CHEROKEE DR. NORTHPORT AL 575 D.L. BOBO 5--58 6
Table 5. Bass eight pounds and larger from 6 BAIT data. WEIGHT DATE ORGANIZATION LOCATION 8.8 January American Bass Anglers Pickwick 8. February Outcasters Bass Club Guntersville 8.5 February Bass Fishing League Guntersville 9.5 February Bass Fishing League Guntersville 8.8 February 5 FLW Stren Series West Point 8.8 February 6 FLW Stren Series West Point 8.8 February 6 FLW Stren Series West Point. February 5 Bass Fishing League Guntersville 8. March American Bass Anglers Guntersville 8. March 5 Bassmaster Weekend Series Guntersville 8. March 5 Bassmaster Weekend Series Guntersville 8.88 March 5 FLW Stren Series Eufaula 8.56 March 9 Bassmaster Weekend Series West Point 8.6 April 9 Hawg Masters Guntersville 8. April Bassmaster Elite Guntersville 8.9 June Bass Fishing League West Point 8. October 9 Central Ala. Buddy Tourn. Trail Martin 7
5 Hrs. / 5 lb. Bass Bass / Day Pounds / Day 9 85 8 75 7 65 Pounds or Number 6 55 5 5 Hours 5 5 986 988 99 99 99 996 998 6 Year Figure. Annual catch for B.A.I.T. tournaments 5 8
POUNDS OR NUMBER 5 COFFEEVILLE AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR POUNDS OR NUMBER 6 DEMOPOLIS 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 POUNDS OR NUMBER 8 7 6 5 YEAR EUFAULA AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR Figure. Annual quality indicators for Coffeeville, Demopolis, and Eufaula, through 6. 9
6 GAINESVILLE 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 5 GUNTERSVILLE AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 5 HARDING AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR Figure. Annual quality indicators for Gainesville, Guntersville, and Harding, through 6. POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER
POUNDS OR NUMBER 6 HARRIS 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 8 JONES BLUFF 7 6 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 8 7 JORDAN 6 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR Figure. Annual quality indicators for Harris, Jones Bluff, and Jordan, through 6. POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER
7 LAY 6 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 7 LOGAN MARTIN 6 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 6 MARTIN 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR Figure 5. Annual quality indicators for Lay, Logan Martin, and Martin, through 6. POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER
7 MILLERS FERRY 6 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 6 MITCHELL 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 5 MOBILE DELTA AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR Figure 6. Annual quality indicators for Millers Ferry, Mitchell, and the Mobile Delta, through 6. POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER
POUNDS OR NUMBER 6 NEELY HENRY 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 5 PICKWICK AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 5 SMITH AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR Figure 7. Annual quality indicators for Neely Henry, Pickwick, and Smith, through 6. POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER
5 WARRIOR AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 7 WEISS 6 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR 5 WEST POINT AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR Figure 8. Annual quality indicators for Warrior, Weiss, and West Point, through 6. POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER POUNDS OR NUMBER 5
POUNDS OR NUMBER 6 WHEELER 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR POUNDS OR NUMBER 7 WILSON 6 5 AVERAGE WEIGHT BASS/ANGLER POUNDS/ANGLER 985 99 995 5 YEAR Figure 9. Annual quality indicators for Wheeler and Wilson, through 6. 6
CHAPTER TRAIL TOURNAMENTS 7
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Mobile Delta During 6, we received trail tournament reports from this reservoir that were held from January through July with the majority ( ea.) being held in February. A total of 68 tournament anglers fished for days, catching 69 bass that averaged.58 pounds (Table 6). The average winning weight for tournaments on this reservoir was 9.6 pounds and ranged from 6. to 5. pounds. Most anglers had to catch at least 6. pounds to receive a check, while the percentage of anglers that did not catch a fish during competition ranged from 9% to 6% and averaged %. Big bass averaged.7 pounds and ranged from.6 to 5. pounds. The heaviest five fish limits were caught in March, but the majority of competitors caught more and bigger fish in April. Although bass in the Delta are generally small when compared to other Alabama reservoirs, the Delta gave up its larger bass uniformly throughout the year. In other words, time of year seemed to have little effect on an angler s chances of catching a larger bass. Catch rates were highest in April with 8% of competitors weighing in at least one fish. This peak in catch rates resulted in the highest average bag weight (.5 pounds) for any month during the entire year. Eufaula During 6, we received 7 trail tournament reports from this reservoir that were held from January through October with the majority (8) occurring in April. A total of,659 tournament anglers fished for,6 days, catching,7 bass that averaged. pounds (Table 7). The average winning weight for tournaments on this reservoir was.86 pounds and ranged from 5.6 to.78 pounds. Most anglers had to catch at least 9.7 pounds to receive a check, while the percentage of anglers that did not catch a fish during competition ranged from % to 5% and averaged %. Big bass averaged 5.7 pounds and ranged from.9 to 8.88 pounds. Average weight of bass varied little throughout the year, but the largest bass were caught in February and March. Catch rates were poorest in April with % of competitors not weighing in any fish. These poor catch rates resulted in the lowest average bag weight (.9 pounds) for any month during the entire year. From January through February, catch rates were good (8%), bass were larger (.55 pounds), and average bag weights were heaviest (6.7 pounds); indicating that this was probably the best time of year to hold tournaments on Lake Eufaula in 6. 8
Guntersville During 6, we received 9 trail tournament reports from this reservoir that were held from January through September with the majority (6) occurring in March. A total of, tournament anglers fished for,8 days, catching 5,6 bass that averaged.9 pounds (Table 8). The average winning weight for tournaments on this reservoir was 9.6 pounds and ranged from.6 to 6.69 pounds. Most anglers had to catch at least.8 pounds to receive a check, while the percentage of anglers that did not catch a fish during competition ranged from % to 59% and averaged 9%. Big bass averaged 7. pounds and ranged from 5.9 to. pounds, with the largest bass being caught during February. Average weight of bass was almost.5 pounds during winter and spring and dropped to around. pounds during the summer months. Catch rates were highest in April with 9% of competitors weighing in at least one fish. This April peak in catch rates resulted in an average bag weight of 8.58 pounds. Nearly 7% of competitors weighed-in over 5 pounds per day, and % of them had weights in excess of pounds. From January through March when the heaviest catches occurred on Guntersville, it took at least pounds to win 7 of tournaments. During the same time period, big bass exceeded 8 pounds in 6 of tournaments. Neely Henry During 6, we received trail tournament reports from this reservoir that were held from February through November with the majority () occurring in April. A total of,7 tournament anglers fished for,69 days, catching,5 bass that averaged.8 pounds (Table 9). The average winning weight for tournaments on this reservoir was. pounds and ranged from. to 9. pounds. Most anglers had to catch at least 8. pounds to receive a check, while the percentage of anglers that did not catch a fish during competition ranged from 5% to 5% and averaged 9%. Big bass averaged 5.7 pounds and ranged from.8 to 6.5 pounds. Average weight of bass was highest from February through mid April, with smaller fish being caught during summer months. Catch rates were highest in June and July with 9% of competitors weighing in at least one fish. Bag weights varied little throughout the year, but were lowest during May (.77 pounds). Big bass varied little throughout the year, and exceeded five pounds in of tournaments. 9
Pickwick During 6, we received 9 trail tournament reports from this reservoir that were held from January through September with the majority (7) occurring in April. A total of,7 tournament anglers fished for,577 days, catching,5 bass that averaged.7 pounds (Table ). The average winning weight for tournaments on this reservoir was.7 pounds and ranged from 5.8 to.9 pounds. Most anglers had to catch at least 8.69 pounds to receive a check, while the percentage of anglers that did not catch a fish during competition ranged from % to 6% and averaged %. Big bass averaged 5.5 pounds and ranged from.78 to 8. pounds. Average weight of bass varied little throughout the year, but the largest bass were caught in March. Catch rates were highest in June with 96% of competitors weighing in at least one fish. This peak in catch rates resulted in the highest average bag weight (8.7 pounds) for any month during the entire year. From January through April, catch rates were generally poor, indicating that a small number of anglers were catching most of the fish. Smith During 6, we received trail tournament reports from this reservoir that were held from January through June with the majority () being held in March. A total of 6 tournament anglers fished for 8 days, catching 9 bass that averaged.79 pounds (Table ). The average winning weight for tournaments on this reservoir was. pounds and ranged from 8. to 8.76 pounds. Most anglers had to catch at least 9. pounds to receive a check, while the percentage of anglers that did not catch a fish during competition ranged from % to 7% and averaged %. Big bass averaged.5 pounds and ranged from.77 to 7.6 pounds. The heaviest five fish limits were caught in March, but the majority of competitors caught more and bigger fish in January and February. The biggest bass were caught in January. West Point During 6, we received trail tournament reports from this reservoir that were held from February through July with the majority ( ea.) being held in March and June. A total of,96 tournament anglers fished for,856 days, catching,99 bass that averaged.9 pounds (Table ). The average winning weight for tournaments on this reservoir was.9 pounds and ranged from 5.5 to. pounds. Most anglers had to catch at least 7. pounds to receive a check, while the percentage of anglers that did not catch a fish during competition ranged from 6% to 7% and averaged %. Big bass averaged 6.9 pounds and ranged from
.8 to 8.56 pounds. The heaviest five fish limits were caught in May, but the majority of competitors caught more and bigger fish in March and April. The biggest bass were caught in February and March. Wheeler During 6, we received 6 trail tournament reports from this reservoir that were held from March through November with the majority (6) occurring in March. A total of,56 tournament anglers fished for,96 days, catching,7 bass that averaged.78 pounds (Table ). The average winning weight for tournaments on this reservoir was. pounds and ranged from 6. to. pounds. Most anglers had to catch at least 8.98 pounds to receive a check, while the percentage of anglers that did not catch a fish during competition ranged from % to 5% and averaged 6%. Big bass averaged 5.9 pounds and ranged from.88 to 7. pounds. Average weight of bass dropped steadily from.6 pounds in February to.8 pounds in August. The largest bass were caught in March and began a steady decline in mid April. Interestingly, there was another small peak in big bass weights during July. Catch rates were highest in May with 95% of competitors weighing in at least one fish. This peak in catch rates resulted in the highest average bag weight (6. pounds) for any month during the entire year.
Table 6. Bass tournament statistics from the Mobile Delta during 6. No. of No. of Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Winning Big Last $$ No. Anglers No. Anglers No. Anglers % Anglers Month Day Format Anglers Angler-Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Weight Bass Weight w/ + lbs. w/ 5+ lbs. w/ + lbs. w/ no Fish January DRAW 9..7.6.6 5..87 8. 6 6 9 DRAW 5 5 6.5.8.7.5 8.68.9.55 JANUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 67 67 5 56.7.6..57.6. 6.5 6 5 February 8 DRAW 7 7 9 8..7.8. 9.9.68 5.7 9 5 TEAM 7 59.7.6.6.6 9.87.55 8.7 6 DRAW 7 7 6 96..58..57.5. 6.8 FEBRUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 68 68 7..6..65..8 6.98 March 8 DRAW 7 8..6. 5..5.59 7. 9 6 DRAW 7 7 5..66.8..87.97 6.9 5 MARCH TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 69.5.6.5.8.66.8 7. April 5 DRAW 6 9.6.8..58 9.6.96 6.88 DRAW 9 9 5..6.8.6.6.8 6.8 APRIL TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 9 87.7.5.9.5 9.8.67 6.68 6 May DRAW 9 8 75 8.6.5..86 6.9.8 5. 8 DRAW 6 7..69.5.5 6. 5.9 5.9 6 MAY TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 9 5.6.57.7.66 6.67.7 5.5 June 5 DRAW.9.5..9 7..6 6. JUNE TOTALS & AVERAGES.9.5..9 7..6 6. July 9 DRAW 8 85 6.6.9.8.6 6.78 5.. 5 JULY TOTALS & AVERAGES 8 85 6.6.9.8.6 6.78 5.. 5 6 TOTALS & AVERAGES 68 69 95..58..59 9.6.7 6. 9
Table 7. Bass tournament statistics from Eufaula Reservoir during 6. No. of No. of Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Winning Big Last $$ No. Anglers No. Anglers No. Anglers % Anglers Month Day Format Anglers Angler-Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Weight Bass Weight w/ + lbs. w/ 5+ lbs. w/ + lbs. w/ no Fish JANUARY 7 DRAW 6 6 5.6.6.75 7..78 5.7. 8 DRAW 6 6 79.9.5..99.5 5..77 9 JANUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 76 95.5.56.8 6. 7.6 5..5 7 6 FEBRUARY 8 TEAM...6 6.8 9. 7..9 9 8 DRAW 86..69.67 7.8 8.9.9.6 8 FEBRUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 5 6 9..5.6 6.6 9. 6.9.9 6 MARCH DRAW 8 7... 5.7.5.9 9.5 DRAW 5 5 8..66.66..6 7.9 7.9 8 5 PRO/AM 5 58.6.55.6 7.8 8.97 8.88.9 8 PRO/AM 66 56.8.5.5.6 9.67 6.9 5. 5 8 TEAM 9 9 5 6...7 6.65. 6.67. 8 5 DRAW 97.9..5.6 7.8 7. 5.6 9 5 DRAW 5.8.5.8..8.67.7 MARCH TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 99 6 55.7..8 5.5.5 6.7 8.76 66 APRIL 8 DRAW 6 6...69.9 6.97 5. 5. 9 TEAM 9 9 5 6.7.59.7 6..58 6.6.67 6 PRO/AM 68 68 76.8...5 6.6 5.88 8.6 5 9 PRO/AM 68 68 6 6...96.6.6 5.8. 6 PRO/AM 77 77 5..6.. 6.8 6.6 7.88 8 8 PRO/AM 78 78 7 7. * * * *.5 * * * * 9 DRAW...67.5.. 9. 5 PRO/AM 78 78 8... 5.8 7.6 6.5 8.75 7 APRIL TOTALS & AVERAGES 66 66 58..5.86. 5.5 5.59 7.9 9 MAY 6 PRO/AM 67 67 8 76...8.7 8. 5.5 8. PRO/AM 67 67 86 97.7...8..8.8 5 9 7 DRAW...5 7.5.58.9.58 7 DRAW 9 9 5 5...78 5.89 9.98.99 9.98 MAY TOTALS & AVERAGES 7 7 57 7...7 5.6..5 8.9 JUNE TEAM 7 6..9.6.7.9 7. 6.8 8 5 DRAW 6 6.8.6.8.97 5.6.9 5.6 7 JUNE TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 9 58 59.9.5.7 7..87 5.66.86 8 6 JULY 5 DRAW 9 9 5.8.7. 5.76 6.97 5.68.69 JULY TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 9 5.8.7. 5.76 6.97 5.68.69 OCTOBER 7 TEAM 8 96 7.8.8..85.5 9.7 9 OCTOBER TOTALS & AVERAGES 8 96 7.8.8..85.5 9.7 9 6 TOTALS & AVERAGES *denotes tournaments without a five fish limit 659 6 7 5.5.5. 5. 5.6 5.7 9.8 68
Table 8. Bass tournament trail statistics from Guntersville Reservoir during 6. No. of No. of Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Winning Big Last $$ No. Anglers No. Anglers No. Anglers % Anglers Month Day Format Anglers Angler-Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Weight Bass Weight w/ + lbs. w/ 5+ lbs. w/ + lbs. w/ no Fish JANUARY DRAW 9 9 6.6.. 7..7 6.5 5.59 7 JANUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 9 6.6.. 7..7 6.5 5.59 7 FEBRUARY 5 TEAM 5 6..58.75..9 7.85.69 7 7 8 PRO/AM 8 8 89.6.7.76 5.9 6.69 9.5. 6 PRO/AM 8 8 95..9.87.86 7.88 8.5 6. 55 5 PRO/AM 8...9 6.5.6 7.69.88 55 7 PRO/AM 98 76.8.57.99.5 9.5. 6.88 8 6 TEAM 9 9 97 5..56.98 7..5 7.5.75 5 9 9 FEBRUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 77 77 86 79..6.88 6.55. 8.8.9 55 5 MARCH DRAW 59 59 7.8.8..7 6.7 8. 6.69 5 PRO/AM 9 9 86..8.55 5..56 8..8 8 PRO/AM 9 9 7.9.5 * * * 8. * * * * 5 TEAM 6 6 9..68. 5.69 6.6 5.8.7 9 PRO/AM 8 8.8.7.76 5.9 6.8 6..9 7 PRO/AM 77 77 58 7.7.9 * * * 6.8 * * * * 5 MARCH TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 65.6..66.9.9 7..6 7 7 APRIL PRO/AM 7 58 9..9.9.6 7.95 7.6 5.8 8 6 PRO/AM 5 9..7.77.8.6 8. 6.8 TEAM 5 5.6.8.6 7.8 5.6 6..5 7 TEAM 9 9 6....8.9 7.7. 5 9 DRAW 8 8 5..5.5 6..66 5.55.9 5 7 APRIL TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 57 75 999.7.89.9 8.58 6.59 6.87.6 8 66 8 MAY DRAW 6 6 6 8.6.95.8 7. 7.78 5.9.6 9 9 7 TEAM 6 6 96 6..7.67 7. 5.67 7.8.6 7 TEAM 8 7..8.8 9.7.6 7.9.77 MAY TOTALS & AVERAGES 86 86 9 67..8.8 7.9 9. 6.5. 9 5 JUNE TEAM 9 9 8...78 6.. 6.7 9.67 8 6 JUNE TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 9 8...78 6.. 6.7 9.67 8 6 JULY 5 DRAW 7.7.8.9 8.77 8.9 6.6.99 8 JULY TOTALS & AVERAGES 7.7.8.9 8.77 8.9 6.6.99 8 SEPTEMBER 9 PRO/AM 6 8 957.5..6..7 7.9 6.8 6 PRO/AM 5 5..5.6.98 6.9 6.8 6.6 59 7 PRO/AM 68 68 5 78...5 7.. 7.56.75 9 5 PRO/AM 68 68 5 56.6.9 * * * 6. * * * * PRO/AM 6 9 96..8. 6. 8.5 6.75 7.8 8 6 6 PRO/AM 6 9 98 565.8.86..95. 6.5 5.5 59 SEPTEMBER TOTALS & AVERAGES 67 956 67 769.5..9.8 8.7 6.8 9.59 6 6 TOTALS & AVERAGES *denotes tournaments without a five fish limit 8 56 556.5.9.5 6.95 9.6 7..8 59 96 8 9
Table 9. Bass tournament trail statistics from Neely Henry Reservoir during 6. No. of No. of Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Winning Big Last $$ No. Anglers No. Anglers No. Anglers % Anglers Month Day Format Anglers Angler-Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Weight Bass Weight w/ + lbs. w/ 5+ lbs. w/ + lbs. w/ no Fish FEBRUARY 8 TEAM 9 8.7.65. 7.96 9.96 5.8.6 FEBRUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 8.7.65. 7.96 9.96 5.8.6 MARCH 5 DRAW 7 65.7..9.69.88 5. 7.9 MARCH TOTALS & AVERAGES 7 65.7..9.69.88 5. 7.9 APRIL 5 DRAW 65 65 85 69.6..85 5.69. 5.5.6 7 - PRO/AM 5 9..69.55..6 5.69 7. 6 9 PRO/AM 76..55.9.8 9. 6.5 6.56 5 TEAM 6 6 88.9.87.88 7.7.9 5.9.6 9 5 APRIL TOTALS & AVERAGES 96 57 69 89..78.6.78.5 5.7 8.7 8 MAY DRAW 5 55.6.59.67.65 9.7.97. 9 PRO/AM 69 69 96 7.8.7.8.89.8.56 7.88 5 PRO/AM 69 69 8..6 * * * 5.88 * * * * MAY TOTALS & AVERAGES 59 59 57.6.65.5.77.8.8 6.5 5 JUNE PRO/AM 56 56 57.7.77.66 6.9 6.6 5.9 9.69 6 PRO/AM 5 5 6.8.7.68.9.8 5. 6. 5 JUNE TOTALS & AVERAGES 98 65..6.7 5..9 5. 8. 9 JULY DRAW 9 9 6 96..55.6 5.7 9.7.8 7.6 5 JULY TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 9 6 96..55.6 5.7 9.7.8 7.6 5 NOVEMBER - PRO/AM 8 658..6.8 5.8. 5. 7.7 6 PRO/AM 6 7 5 87.6.6 * * * 5.88 * * * * 9 NOVEMBER TOTALS & AVERAGES 79 58 5 59..6.8 5.8. 5.66 7.7 6 7 6 TOTALS & AVERAGES *denotes tournaments without a five fish limit 7 69 5 6968..8.7 5.. 5.7 8. 8 8 9 5
Table. Bass tournament statistics from Pickwick Lake during 6. No. of No. of Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Winning Big Last $$ No. Anglers No. Anglers No. Anglers % Anglers Month Day Format Anglers Angler-Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Weight Bass Weight w/ + lbs. w/ 5+ lbs. w/ + lbs. w/ no Fish JANUARY DRAW 87..98.67 7.6 9.5 8..8 7 JANUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 87..98.67 7.6 9.5 8..8 7 MARCH PRO/AM 658 57..9.57.75.8 7. 5.75 6 PRO/AM 6 6.8.8.6.7 7.77 6.69. 5 TEAM 6 6 8..6.5..9 6.7 6.7 TEAM..8. 7..9 7.7.98 7 MARCH TOTALS & AVERAGES 55 95 688.6..67.96.96 7. 6.7 APRIL PRO/AM 8 8 98...9. 5. 6..6 7 8 PRO/AM 7 7 9 7..99.6.8 9.8 5.56.5 6 DRAW 6 6 9 9.8.9.5.6 5.8.78 5.8 8 DRAW 7 7..76.5..8.. 9 8 TEAM 9.6.. 9.6 5.5 5..76 5 9 TEAM 6 76..89.65 6.9 5.5 5.5 9.99 7 9 DRAW 77..79.9 7..96.7.55 9 APRIL TOTALS & AVERAGES 57 65.5.86.9.7.78.6 7.97 6 MAY TEAM 6 6 6 9.7..67 6. 8.8 5.9.89 6 5 DRAW 9.5.77.75.88 9..65 9. 5 MAY TOTALS & AVERAGES 65 65 7..8.7 5.6.56. 9.97 6 JUNE DRAW 8 8 67.5..7 7.7 5.89 6..79 6 DRAW 5 5 95 78.7.88.8 7.5 6.6 5.9. 5 TEAM 5 6..6.58 9.89 7.55 5.9.8 8 JUNE TOTALS & AVERAGES 76 76 69.6.. 8.7 6.68 5.57.59 7 5 JULY 5 DRAW 6 6... 6.7 6.87.6 8. JULY TOTALS & AVERAGES 6 6... 6.7 6.87.6 8. SEPTEMBER 6 TEAM 5 5 76 9..56..66 7. 5.99 8.5 8 55 SEPTEMBER TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 5 76 9..56..66 7. 5.99 8.5 8 55 6 TOTALS & AVERAGES 7 577 5 55.5.7.6 5.8.7 5.5 8.69 9 6
Table. Bass tournament statistics from Smith Lake during 6. No. of No. of Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Winning Big Last $$ No. Anglers No. Anglers No. Anglers % Anglers Month Day Format Anglers Angler-Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Weight Bass Weight w/ + lbs. w/ 5+ lbs. w/ + lbs. w/ no Fish JANUARY 5 DRAW.6..5 8.7.96 5.98.9 6 8 DRAW 6..69.77.69 9.9 5. 8.9 JANUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES.8.6. 6.58.8 5.56.9 6 7 FEBRUARY 8 DRAW 5 5 56..8.7 6.8.76 5.55.6 9 DRAW 5... 8...8. FEBRUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 8 8 68 7.6.97.87 7.6..8.7 5 MARCH PRO/AM 86 65.6..6 5. 6.75 5.88 9.6 8 PRO/AM 5 5 6..9..9..6.5 7 DRAW 8 8 7.9.66.8 5.6..6 9.5 5 8 DRAW 86..5.9 5.65 8.76 7.6 7.55 MARCH TOTALS & AVERAGES 66 66 55 998..79.66.55.7 5.8 7. APRIL 5 DRAW 5 5 5 89..7.7 5.9.7.56.6 7 DRAW 8 6.5.6.97 6..68. 9. DRAW 6 6 6 7.6.7.67.6 8..77 8. 7 APRIL TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 57 7..68.7 5.65.66.58 9.5 7 8 JUNE DRAW 8 5 5..9.8 5.6 9.98.5 9.98 JUNE TOTALS & AVERAGES 8 5 5..9.8 5.6 9.98.5 9.98 6 TOTALS & AVERAGES 6 8 9 7.6.79.6 5.77..5 9. 7
Table. Bass tournament trail statistics from West Point Reservoir during 6. No. of No. of Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Winning Big Last $$ No. Anglers No. Anglers No. Anglers % Anglers Month Day Format Anglers Angler-Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Weight Bass Weight w/ + lbs. w/ 5+ lbs. w/ + lbs. w/ no Fish FEBRUARY 5 PRO/AM 56 6..6..8. 8.8 5.7 5 PRO/AM 7 6.7.8.6.5 5.5 8.8.75 7 FEBRUARY TOTALS & AVERAGES 86 85 99.9..97.7 8.59 8.8.9 6 MARCH DRAW 9 9 98 8..88..76.6 5.55 7. 5 TEAM 9 98..5.97 6.9.9 7.. 8 9 9 PRO/AM 9 9 98 5.7.76. 5.6 6.5 8.56 8. 9 5 TEAM 9.7.7.56 6.5.6 6. 9.7 5 6 MARCH TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 5 6..87.9 5.6.8 6.8 9. 5 7 APRIL DRAW 9 9 88 69.9.9. 5.86.5 6..7 6 APRIL TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 9 88 69.9.9. 5.86.5 6..7 6 MAY 7 TEAM 76 9..97.5 6.79 6.5 6.75 9.87 DRAW 9 9 9 89.9.9. 6.55 9.6 6.5 8.8 5 PRO/AM 6 6 7 66.5.67..85 5.6 5.8 6.69 7 PRO/AM 6 6 7 6.9.7.5.6 8.56 6.5. 6 MAY TOTALS & AVERAGES 7 7 78 7.7.8.6.86.7 6. 7.8 5 5 JUNE PRO/AM 7 7 5 676..9.7.98. 8.9 7.6 7 PRO/AM 5 5 9 79..8.8.5.56 5.5.8 8 DRAW 8.5.9... 5. 9.79 9 TEAM 96...7.8.8 6. 7.8 6 5 TEAM 6 6.9.7..8 5.88.8 5.88 JUNE TOTALS & AVERAGES 7 7 657 57..96.86.6. 5.7 7. 7 JULY 9 DRAW 8..5..5 8.9.8.67 5 JULY TOTALS & AVERAGES 8..5..5 8.9.8.67 5 6 TOTALS & AVERAGES 96 856 99 588.5.9...9 6.9 7. 6 7 8
Table. Bass tournament statistics from Wheeler Reservoir during 6. No. of No. of Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Winning Big Last $$ No. Anglers No. Anglers No. Anglers % Anglers Month Day Format Anglers Angler-Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Weight Bass Weight w/ + lbs. w/ 5+ lbs. w/ + lbs. w/ no Fish MARCH 5 DRAW 6 6 7 7...6.76 8.5 7. 9. 5 8 DRAW 9 9 6 9.6.9..8 7.6 6.65.6 6 9 TEAM 7 8...7.8. 6.9. 5 TEAM 98 5.7..5 5. 7.7 6.98 8.8 5 5 PRO/AM 8 8 8 66..9.75.9.8 6.6 6.8 9 PRO/AM 8 8 8..97.79.56 7.56 5.9.8 5 6 PRO/AM 7 7 86.9..8.88 7.9 6.9 6.9 9 8 PRO/AM 7 7 55 6.8.9 * * * 6.8 * * * * 5 MARCH TOTALS & AVERAGES 6 6 9 98..6..9 7.76 6.55 9.5 8 APRIL DRAW 6 6 86 79..8.9.97 6.9 6.6 8.6 6 5 8 PRO/AM 96 96 5 9..95.6 5. 5. 6.6 9. 5 PRO/AM 9 9 75..9.9.6 5.9 5.8 6.69 7 5 DRAW 9 9 86 5..75.97 5.8.87 5.6 8.95 7 APRIL TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 5 599 5.7.9.7.7 5. 5.9 8. MAY TEAM 9 9 6.8.79.78 6.76.9.7 9.95 DRAW 7 7 8.6.69. 5..7.8 9. 5 TEAM 7 7 7.7..7.9 6.75.9 6.75 MAY TOTALS & AVERAGES 5 75..8.87 7.6.5.8.9 6 5 JUNE 7 DRAW 6..6.97.78.8.9 8.7 7 DRAW 9.7.5. 5.9.6.5 7.96 5 TEAM 5 5 9.8.. 9.. 6.. 9 DRAW 8 7.8.5.55..7.88 6.5 5 JUNE TOTALS & AVERAGES 7.7.78. 5.6.7.8 9.8 JULY 8 DRAW 65..8.8 5..8 5.6 9.6 DRAW 6.9.76.9.5.9 5. 7.8 6 TEAM 7 7 8 55..97. 7.89.85 7.7.85 JULY TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 57..69. 5.. 6. 9.68 6 AUGUST 5 DRAW 7 7 5.5.76. 7.79.7.9.7 5 DRAW 6 6.7..55.6.69 6. 5. AUGUST TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 7 9 87..8.9 5.7. 5. 8.6 6 7 NOVEMBER PRO/AM 97 6..78. 5.7.67 7. 8. PRO/AM 97 76.9.65.8. 6. 5..78 9 NOVEMBER TOTALS & AVERAGES 9 88 67 576..7.5.6 9. 6.6 6.6 7 6 TOTALS & AVERAGES *denotes tournaments without a five fish limit 56 96 7 8..78.86 5.8.5 5.9 9.8 9 6 9
Table. Bass tournament trail statistics from Alabama reservoirs during 6. No. of No. of Competition Total Fish Total Wt. Avg. Fish per Wt. per Reservoir Tourn. Anglers Days Caught Caught Fish Wt. Angler Angler Bankhead 7 9.6.8.7.7 Claiborne 6 6 59 86.5.7.69 5. Demopolis 58 58 68 6.6.99.9.6 Eufaula 7 659 6 7 5.5.5. 5. Guntersville 9 8 56 556.5.9.5 6.95 Harding 5...6.9 Holt 6 6 75.8.8.69 6.9 Jones Bluff 9 6 89 78. 5. Jordan 7 5 5 67. 8.65 Lay 8 89 5.5 6.7 Logan Martin 6 57 597 5 6..9.77 7. Martin 9 9 9. 5.7 Millers Ferry 8 6.5.66.6.9 Mitchell 85 85. 7.7 Mobile Delta 68 69 95..58..59 Neely Henry 6 69 6968..69.5. Pickwick 9 7 577 5 55.5.7.6 5.8 Smith 6 8 9 7.6.79.6 5.77 Warrior 8 8 8.5.9.5.8 Weiss 7 7 7 95 76..9.78 5.7 West Point 7 96 856 99 588.5.9.. Wheeler 6 56 96 7 8..78.86 5.8 Wilson 6 6 67...69 5.7
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the independent Alabama bass clubs, the Georgia Bass Federation, and the Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks for their genuine interest in this program and their willingness to take a proactive approach to managing bass fisheries in Alabama s reservoirs. Without their cooperation, assistance, and enthusiasm, this program would not be possible.
The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, age, gender, national origin, or disability in its hiring or employment practices nor in admission to, or operations of its programs, services, or activities. This publication is available in alternative formats.
RT OR A