Overview of the U. S. Trout Industry

Similar documents
Catfish Feed Deliveries

Mink. Pelt Production Down 10 Percent

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and , , ,514

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and , , ,564

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and , , ,619

Propagating and Selling Fish

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

LAKES - NACHES RANGER DISTRICT

Trout Production at the Bobby N. Setzer Fish Hatchery

Agaricus and Specialty Mushroom Number of Growers, Sales, Price, and Value United States: , , and

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service

Korell Outfitter and Guide Special-Use Permit Amendment

2011 U. S. Catfish Database

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

2010 U.S. Catfish Database

SST Installation Guide. Brenda Land, Sanitary Engineer

, PIl USDA/Sll-B77 CO'T'l'ON', GINNING CIIARGE;S, HARVESTING PRAC'l'ICES, ' AND SELECTED MARKETING COSTS, 19f!2/93 SEASON.

BMO Capital Markets 2014 Farm to Market Conference New York, New York. May 21, 2014

GROWS. Hello 4-H families, Please take the time to read through this months newsletter and mark the below dates on your calendars.

June 3, 2014 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. Stacy Horton, Policy Analyst, Washington. SUBJECT: Final 2012 Hatchery Fin Clip Report

'30"W '25"W 82 43'20"W 94B 94C 94C1 56 NOLICHUCKY

Sunfish / Bluegill Fillets - 5 lbs Price: $87.00 Skin on Fillets - Individually Frozen 2012 source: internet

2012 U. S. Catfish Database

Maintenance of Ontario s Aquaculture Statistics Program: AQUASTATS. Final Report submitted to: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

BMO Capital Markets New York Road Show New York, New York. December 5, 2013

Striped Bass and White Hybrid (x) Striped Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

Goldman Sachs U.S. Emerging/SMID Cap Growth Conference. New York, New York

Cocahoe Economics Fact Sheet

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

The UK Experience with use of Triploids for Restocking

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Economic Modeling of Walleye and Hybrid Walleye Production Protocols

Goldman Sachs Eighteenth Annual Agribusiness Conference New York, New York. March 12, 2014

Auburn University. Marine Extension. & Research Center SEA GRANT EXTENSION. Circular ANR-805 MASG P

Sidoti & Company, LLC West Coast Road Show. San Francisco, California

June 23, Re: Docket No. FSIS To Whom It May Concern:

Livestock, Poultry, and Dairy: Situation and Outlook

ANS 18 Test Yourself Sample Test Questions. 1. With respect to relative GLOBAL production tonnage, correctly order the following on the pyramid below:

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

Mount Snow Disc Golf Course and Mountain Bike Race Course Project

The University of Georgia

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

BMO Capital Markets 2013 Farm to Market Conference New York, New York. May 14, 2013

Appendix B General Explanation and Report Form

Toward an Outlook for California Agriculture Relevant to GHG Emissions Mitigation. April 30, Daniel A. Sumner

Golden Eggs: Kern River Hatchery and the Conservation of California s State Fish

Hybrid Walleye (Saugeye)- The Wisconsin Experience. Why Walleye? High market value Wide-spread reputation as a food fish Limited domestic supply

(Shell)Fish out of water... Skills: calculating, reasoning, critical thinking, writing, participating

Outlook for Livestock and Poultry. Michael Jewison World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA

Winter Culture of Caged Rainbow Trout in the South.

Winter Culture of Caged Rainbow Trout in the South.

Contribution of the Bison Industry to the North Dakota Economy

ANS 18 Test Yourself Sample Test Questions. 1. With respect to relative GLOBAL production tonnage, correctly order the following on the pyramid below:

Previous Work on the Culture of the Cocahoe Minnow Fundulus grandis

SGS, LLC AQUACULTURE

Goldman Sachs Agricultural Biotech Forum New York, NY. March 7, 2012

Outlook for the U.S. Livestock and Poultry Sectors in 2011

Outlook for the U.S. Livestock and Poultry Sectors in 2012 Presented By Shayle D. Shagam World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA

Ad Hoc Review Group IP(06)12 FINAL. Implementation Plan. European Union (Denmark)

Horse and Pony Project Worksheet

Internet Use Among Illinois Hunters: A Ten Year Comparison

An Agricultural Update

Angling in Manitoba (2000)

CHANNEL CATFISH CULTURE IN THE UNITED STATES. Leonard Lovshin Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures Auburn University, AL 36849

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

Submitted by The Canadian Biotechnology Action Network (CBAN) Contact: Lucy Sharratt, Coordinator cban.

Grading Ornamental Fish 1

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

Prince William Sound Aquaculture Corporation Economic Impact Update for 2010

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

2014 Winnebago System Walleye Report

WF4133 Fisheries Science. Housekeeping. Random selection from lab WHAT EXACTLY IS FISHERIES SCIENCE?

Rural Ontario s Hidden Sector: The Economic Importance of the Horse Industry Final Report

Page 1. USDA s Mandatory Farm Programs CBO s January 2019 Baseline

Farm Sector Income & Finances 2016 Outlook. By Ryan Kuhns and Kevin Patrick March 16, 2016

colorado.edu/business/brd

Catfish Industry. The Delta. ANS 18 - CATFISH vs BASA 1

Provide a brief introduction to the U.S. seafood industry

1/12/17 - Final Doddridge County 4-H & FFA Livestock Show and Sale Rules and Regulations

Section J. Games & Activities

A WHITE PAPER ON THE STATUS AND NEEDS OF SALMONID AQUACULTURE IN THE NORTH CENTRAL REGION

Overview of Recreational Pond Management

~ Origin & Goals. Paul Rawson, Dale Leavitt, Dana Morse & Diane Murphy

Iowa 4-H Animal and Poultry Identification, Weighing, and Exhibiting Requirements for County, State and Interstate Shows

Platte River State Fish Hatchery Summary of 2012 Production and Operational Activities

U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Tampier Lake Population Survey

Appendix G Coastal Demographic and Economic Trends Additional Figures

Agriculture and the Economy: A View from the Chicago Fed

VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE APALACHICOLA BAY MARINE ECONOMY

Salmon in the classroom

CHALLENGES OF MARKETING NON-NATIVE DEER AND VENISON PRODUCTS. Dr. Greg Clary 1

Livestock Feed Requirements Study

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

HORSES IN CANADA IN 2010

Transcription:

Washington, D.C. Overview of the U. S. Trout Industry Released September 29, 2009, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on call Chris Hawthorn at 202-720-08, office hours 7:0 a.m. to :00 p.m. ET. History and Background of Trout Production in the U.S. The trout industry in the United States traces its roots back to the mid 1800 s. America s westward expansion created more demand on local fish populations. The development of an artificial spawning system for rearing of eggs into fry was a major achievement for the industry. This revolutionized the trout industry in the U.S. by allowing hatcheries to raise far higher numbers of young fish, which would be stocked into rivers, lakes and ponds. Several species of trout are raised in U.S. farms, but the majority of trout grown in U.S. farms are rainbow trout. Brown trout, lake trout, and steelhead, which is the ocean-going variety of the rainbow trout, are also found in the U.S. Many people across the country enjoy both the food and recreational opportunities that U.S. trout farmers provide. No two trout farms are exactly alike. Each one is specialized to meet a different public need. Fee-fishing operations are set up to provide the public with the opportunity to harvest their own fish. State, Federal and Tribal hatcheries raise trout to be released back into streams and lakes. Commercial trout farms raise the fish that ultimately make it into restaurants across the country. Trout can be raised in open ponds, circular tanks, and straight raceways or in floating fish cages. Intensive trout production begins with quality brood stock. Eggs from carefully selected adult females are harvested and fertilized by male fish shortly after. Eggs are transferred into special troughs designed to accommodate their incubation and hatching. Once hatched, trout fry still depend on their yolk sack for nourishment. After the yolk sac has been absorbed the young fish will begin to look for its own food. This is usually the stage where they will be transferred to another tank designed for raising these small fry. Fry are grown into fingerling fish and then ultimately food size with each new life cycle requiring different space and feeding needs. Trout farmers take the utmost care in making sure that the needs of their fish are being met. Chemicals, oxygenation, water temperature, susceptibility to predators and protection from disease are all carefully monitored to ensure the health of the fish. Brief Overview of the Report Looking at the change in trout operations (Graph 1) from 200 to 2007, all trout producing states increased the number of operations with the exception of Idaho and West Virginia. During that same time period the total value of fish sold and the fish distributed increased (Graph 2). Beginning in 200 the value of trout distributed for restoration, conservation, and recreational purposes, primarily by State and Federal hatcheries became larger than the total value of fish sales received by the trout growers in the U.S. Trout sales for the size category twelve inches and longer made up the majority of trout dollars (Graph ) from 200 to 2007. Comparing 200 to 2007, trout sales including eggs increased by 9.1 percent. A comparison of the number of U.S. trout lost versus the pounds lost can be found in Graph. A break out of the percent of trout sold by point of first sale for 2007 can be found on graphs and. Graph shows the percentage for inch to 12 inch trout. Fee fishing makes up the largest percentage for this size category, fish sold to other producers followed by fish sold to the government were the next two largest categories. Graph shows the percentage for 12 inch or longer trout. Processing makes up the largest percentage of this size category followed by fee fishing establishments. Aq 9 (9-09)

Brief Comment about 200-2007 Final Estimates This report is a comprehensive collection of statistics on the U.S. Trout industry from 200-2007. Revisions to the data were made after a thorough review of survey and administrative data and information from the 200 Census of Aquaculture and the 2007 Census of Agriculture. The 200-2007 estimates shown herein are considered final and will not be revised again. As you can see on the following pages, sales of trout in the U.S. have been on a steady increase since 200. The major sales outlet for inch to 12 inch trout were to fee and recreational fishing establishments followed by federal and state government. The majority of fish larger than 12 were sold to processors. Survey Procedures and Methodology Trout data are collected through three different surveys. A description of each survey follows. Annual Trout Survey The annual Trout Survey is conducted each January. Every known operator who produces trout or trout eggs either for distribution or sale is contacted either by mail, phone or in-person. Data are carefully analyzed for consistency and reasonableness. Results are published in the Trout Production report near the end of February each year. Questions such as the number of trout raised, total pounds produced and total value of production are asked. Also, breakouts of losses and point of first sale information is collected. Census of Agriculture The Census of Agriculture is conducted every five years and is mandatory for all types of farming operations with at least $1,000 in sales or potential sales of agricultural products. The Census of Agriculture encompasses all livestock, crop and aquaculture commodities. Data collected during this survey are tabulated at the County, State, and U.S. levels. Aquaculture data are asked in the other livestock section where respondents have the opportunity to list the type of aquaculture that they raise as well as production numbers during the reference year. Census of Aquaculture The Census of Aquaculture expands on the aquaculture data collected from the Census of Agriculture and provides a current and comprehensive picture of the aquaculture sector at the State and National level. The first aquaculture census was conducted in 1998 in response to the need for an accurate measure of the aquaculture sector. The second aquaculture census was conducted in 200. The target population for the 200 Census of Aquaculture was all commercial or non-commercial places from which $1,000 or more of aquaculture products were produced and either sold or distributed during the census year. Commercial operations qualified with sales greater than or equal to $1,000. Non-commercial operations included operations that produced an estimated value of $1,000 or more of aquaculture products, but released or distributed their production for purposes of restoration, conservation, or recreation. Examples of non-commercial operations include Federal and State hatcheries. The Census of Aquaculture collects data concerning methods of production, sources of water used, farm employment and sales outlets.

Contents Page Graphics... 1 Number of Trout Operations... Value of Trout Sold and Distributed... Trout Sales... 7 Trout Point of First Sale... 1 Trout... Distributed Trout... 1 Reliability of Trout Production Estimates... 22 Terms and Definitions... 22 Information Contacts... 2 September 2009 i NASS, USDA

September 2009 1 NASS, USDA

September 2009 2 NASS, USDA

September 2009 NASS, USDA

State Trout: Number of Operations Selling and/or Distributing Fish and/or Eggs, by State and United States, 200-200 Selling Trout Distributing Trout 1 200 200 200 200 200 200 Number Number Number Number Number Number CT ME MA TN 2 2 7 11 18 10 0 1 7 1 21 19 1 2 2 0 9 1 1 28 11 7 1 9 8 27 1 9 1 1 1 9 2 7 17 1 17 7 11 1 1 1 9 9 29 7 9 2 8 28 8 18 7 1 11 1 21 1 17 2 27 8 1 2 1 8 10 7 21 1 21 17 8 7 2 19 8 12 1 20 US 2 92 1 Trout distributed for restoration, conservation, or recreational purposes. 1 22 22 2 20 State total. CT 2 ME 2 MA 2 TN 2 State Trout: Number of Operations Selling and/or Distributing Fish and/or Eggs, by State and United States, 200-200 Selling Trout Distributing Trout 1 200 200 200 200 200 200 Number Number Number Number Number Number 27 2 1 1 20 1 9 8 7 21 20 9 2 70 1 2 7 2 1 2 2 9 28 1 8 10 2 9 9 17 8 22 18 2 7 9 1 17 17 1 1 10 2 21 8 22 1 8 12 1 12 18 8 21 19 17 8 7 7 1 19 7 1 2 2 2 21 1 8 1 18 1 9 8 1 20 Oth Sts 18 98 US 02 1 Trout distributed for restoration, conservation, or recreational purposes. 2 Estimates discontinued in 200. Other States include State estimates not shown and States suppressed due to disclosure. 20 State total for 200. All States included in 200. 7 12 281 September 2009 NASS, USDA

State Trout: Number of Operations Selling and/or Distributing Fish and/or Eggs, by State and United States, 2007 Selling Trout Distributing Trout 1 2007 2007 2007 Number Number Number 1 2 8 12 7 71 7 229 2 11 2 7 19 11 29 1 2 9 20 9 1 22 1 2 2 2 7 2 12 8 17 1 1 99 10 2 Oth Sts 2 2 1 12 US 1,12 1 Trout distributed for restoration, conservation, or recreational purposes. 2 Other States include State estimates not listed and States suppressed due to disclosure. 2 8 State Trout: Value of Fish Sold and Distributed, by State (excluding eggs), and United States (excluding and including eggs), 200-200 Value of Fish Sold Value of Distributed Fish 200 1 200 200 200 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars CT ME MA TN,18 2,12 7 81 2,98 220 89 91 1,990 797,70 0,78 199 1,0 1,8,191 77 1,9,10 991 0 9, 212 790 2,7 78,909 807,22 181 70 92,792 9 1, 10,2,79,2 1, 92 2,2,89 1,9,2 1,78 2,07 8,8,9 2,79 1,0,29 9,128 818,989 2,1 1,77 Oth Sts 2 18,91 19,9 US 9,871,21 0,091 0,72 US,07 71,0 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Other States include States suppressed due to disclosure. 20 State total. Due to disclosure, the sum of individual States may not equal the total. Excludes value of eggs. 20 State total. Due to disclosure, the sum of individual States may not equal the total. Includes value of eggs. 1,0 2,1 September 2009 NASS, USDA

State Trout: Value of Fish Sold and Distributed, by State (excluding eggs), and United States (excluding and including eggs), 200-200 1 Value of Fish Sold Value of Distributed Fish 200 200 200 200 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars CT 2 ME 2 MA 2 TN 2,880 1,7 7 8,89 28 99 1,010 2, 27,11 807,822 00 7 1,20,1 1,7, 2, 0 1, 902 2,2 78 7,22 1,790 18 1,7,007 2 1,7 8,989,8,9,1 721,78 10,7 2,90, 1,818 2,120 11,912,,7 2,72 1,8 7,9 1,01 2,10 7,81 2,0 2,9 Oth Sts,01 2,990, US 70, 78,98 7,79 10,09 US 7,11 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Estimates discontinued in 200. Other States include State estimates not listed and States suppressed due to disclosure. Excludes value of eggs. Includes value of eggs. 20 State for 200, US total for 200. 79,8 107,78 State Trout: Value of Fish Sold and Distributed, by State (excluding eggs), and United States (excluding and including eggs), 2007 Value of Fish Sold Value of Distributed Fish 2007 2007 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars,98 2,7 78,1 88 2,11 0,2 1,1,212 1,11,29 9 1,90 11,711,8,99 1,220 1,71 1,071, 2,27 1,910 9,0 2,89 Oth Sts 1,81,11 US 2 87,8 112,7 US 9,7 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Other States include State estimates not listed and States suppressed due to disclosure. 2 Excludes value of eggs. Includes value of eggs. 11,180 September 2009 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 12" or Longer CT ME MA TN Number of Fish Trout Sales by Size Category, by State and United States, 200-200 Live Weight Average per Fish Sales Average Price per Pound 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pounds 1,000 Pounds Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars Dollars Dollars 1,720 20 10,000 20 10,10 10 1,80 0 17 00 870 20 90 1,80 27 00 9,000 7 28 90,10 220 1,10 180 00 70 00 2,00 70 12,00 1 27 19,110 210 1,0 190 0,700 1 2,200 2 20 2,900 0 87,90 200 1,10 1 00,00 78 87 1. 1.. 1..,0 1,10 2,2 1 87,0 18,79 19 9 1,10,18 0 1,7,12 7 827,20 18 01 22,7 8, 21 808,99 8 1,072 1.90.00 2.90 0.77.9 2.0 2.88 2 1.99 2.0 2.2 2.7 2. 1. 2.0 1.9 2. 1.97 0.80 1.97.01 1.8 2. 2.90 2.8 2. 2.02 8 1.7 2.77 Oth Sts 2 81 7 717 72 1,8 2,021 2.17 2.7 US,0 9,91 0,8 7, 2,898 9,97 Fish " - 12" CT ME MA TN 0 70 10 00 7 0 00 0 1 10 00 10 0 880 00 20 22 0 211 0 170 71 20 8 0 110 21 277 12 0.2 0. 0.2 0. 0. 0. 77 289 1 7 802 108 8 191 80 17 179 217 10 821 9 2 2.1. 1. 2.7.80 2.9 2.27 2.9 2.72 2.7.70 1. 2.82.80 2.0 2.70 Oth Sts 2, 2,8 1,2 90 2,9 2, 2. 2. US See footnote(s) at end of table.,1,18 2,29 2,179,7,82 2.0 2.9 --continued September 2009 7 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 1" - " CT ME MA TN Number of Fish Trout Sales by Size Category, by State and United States, 200-200 (continued) Live Weight Average per 1,000 Fish Sales Average Price per 1,000 Fish 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pounds 1,000 Pounds Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars Dollars Dollars 210 70,90 0 270 190 1,00 1 0 110 2,80 0 190 10 290 2 1 8 2 1 1. 28. 19.2 20.0 29. 1.8. 12.1. 27. 1.9 2.0 2. 1.7 1.8 8 21 0 80 0 87 1 18 22 7 2 11 7 10 1 227.00 00.00 90.00 28.00 29.00 17.00 298.00 18.00 18.00 08.00 2.00 90.00 2.00.00 17.00 209.00 Oth Sts 2 1,712 1,29 1. 2. 2 2 189.00 189.00 US 7,7,0 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Other States include States suppressed due to disclosure. 20 State total. Due to disclosure, the sum of the 20 individual States may not equal total. 18 11 2.9 2 1,20 9 19.00 17.00 Region 2 Northeast South and Central West Trout Eggs Sales by State, Region, and United States, 200-200 1 Number of Eggs Average Price per 1,000 Eggs Sales 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 Dollars Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 0 20 22,20 2,000 90 1,080 287,00 277,000 1.0 20 1.80 1.00 27.70 22.20 1.0 1.0 10 1,1,08 2 2,780,71 US 2, 289,20 1 Revised. 2 Data published at the regional level to avoid disclosure of individual operations. Regions are defined as follows - Northeast: CT, MA, ME,, and ; South:,,, TN,, and ; Central:,, and ; West:,,,,, and. 20 State total. 1.80 1.70,17,80 September 2009 8 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 12" or Longer CT 2 ME 2 MA 2 TN 2 Number of Fish Trout Sales by Size Category, by State and United States, 200-200 1 Live Weight Average per Fish Sales Average Price per Pound 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pounds 1,000 Pounds Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars Dollars Dollars 2,00 10 0,000 00 100,0 109 1,290 8 1 90 910 11 0 1,0 20 20 8,000 70 80,890 100 1,290 7 0 970 99 0 2,0 0,00 28 1,0 1,20 92 1 7,10 171 8 2,000 9 20,00 2 82,0 108 1,00 87 1,900 100 7 1...0,018 9 89,1 819 2,71 99,97 2 1,010,0 28 1,02,000 1,9 80 0,920 718 11,9 22,78 01 1,288,27 209 1,2 2. 2.7 1.9 1.0 2.0 2.91 1.8 2.79.01 2.78 2.97 1.0 2 1.92 2.8 2.0.1 2.2 8 2.0.79 1.7 2.09 2.7. 2.01 2.09 2.20 Oth Sts 79 1,0 1, 1,27 1. 2,2,09 1.98 2.8 US,18 0,19 9,900 2,7, 9,872 2 Fish " - 12" CT 2 ME 2 MA 2 TN 2 970 1 177 0 90 1 12 0 20 00 120 70 11 10 80 210 02 8 8 27 190 2 7 171 88 179 0 22 1 200 198 0. 0. 7 2 0 72 8 2 0 22 90 199 1 101 90 77 22 2.21 1.80.20 1.0.01 2.71.07 2. 2.7 2.7.98 1. 2.. 2.1.1 Oth Sts 2,09, 801 2,19 0. 2,21,797 2.77 2.19 US See footnote(s) at end of table.,8 7,8 1,99,179,290 7,2 2. 2.0 --continued September 2009 9 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 1" - " CT 2 ME 2 MA 2 TN 2 Number of Fish Trout Sales by Size Category, by State and United States, 200-200 1 (continued) Live Weight Average per 1,000 Fish Sales Average Price per 1,000 Fish 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pounds 1,000 Pounds Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars Dollars Dollars 10 109,0 290 22 91 1,0 198 0 200,90 90 1,00 0 11 7 2 1 0 1 8 8 10 10 21. 27. 1. 17.2 9 1 0.1 20.2 29. 0.0 2. 2. 19 1 8 87 17 2 1 1 8 2 122 2 8 82.00.00 1.00 299.00 29.00 18.00 2.00 19.00 7.00 9.00 118.00 1.00 19.00 20 Oth Sts 99 1,7 0 70 0.2 9. 11 12.00 207.00 US,98 8,01 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Estimates discontinued in 200. Other States include State estimates not shown and States suppressed due to disclosure. 20 State total for 200, US total for 200. 1 202 2. 2.2 1,22 1,82 189.00 18.00 Northeast South and Central West Region 2 Trout Eggs Sales by State, Region, and United States, 200-200 1 Number of Eggs Average Price per 1,000 Eggs Sales 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 Dollars Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 2 2 0,210 29,000 71 2 20.20 19.10 1.80 17.00 20 11.0 1 10,119,01 10 US 07,81 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Data published at the regional level to avoid disclosure of individual operations. Regions for 200 are defined as follows - Northeast: CT, MA, ME,, and ; South:,,, TN,, and ; Central:,, and ; West:,,,,, and. Regions for 200 are the same as 200 but excludes CT, MA, ME, and TN. 20 State total for 200, 1 State total for 200. Due to disclosure, the sum of individual regions may not equal the total. 1.80,1 September 2009 10 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 12" or Longer Number of Fish Trout Sales by Size Category, by State and United States, 2007 Live Weight Average per Fish Sales Average Price per Pound 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 1,000 1,000 Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars Dollars 1,810 70,00 20,020 1,080 101 90 1,210 18 80 2,10 82 9,900 2,00 1,10 111 8,900 202 2 1..2,0 2,20,07 7 179,00,0 0 1,272,212 1, 2..27 2.8.97 2.8.1 2.17 8 1..9 Oth Sts 1 2,7 2,8 7,2 2.7 US 8,7,910 79,2 9 Fish " - 12" 90 88 790 1 10 20 100 8 9 2 20 187 0 0. 0. 210 79 208 1,00 1 9 2.9.00 1.72..10.00.1 Oth Sts 1 2,78 1,100,29 2.99 US See footnote(s) at end of table.,11 2,11,22.02 --continued September 2009 11 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 1" - " Number of Fish Trout: Sales by Size Category, by State and United States, 2007 (continued) Live Weight Average per 1,000 Fish Sales Average Price per 1,000 Fish 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 1,000 1,000 Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars Dollars 0,10 00 2,70 1 11 2 1 21 9. 2. 2..2 8. 1 19 1 0 2 129 8 202 199 Oth Sts 1 2,9 8 18 US 10,7 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Other States include State estimates not shown and States suppressed due to disclosure. 9 9.0 1,811 178 Northeast South and Central West Region 1 2 Trout Eggs: Sales by State, Region, and United States, 2007 Number of Eggs Average Price per 1,000 Eggs Sales 2007 2007 2007 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1 80 98,07 89,000 21.80 19.90 19.10 19.20 12 1 7,92 7,9 US 99, 1 Data published at the regional level to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 2 Regions for 2007 are defined as follows - Northeast:, and ; South:,,,, and ; Central:,, and ; West:,,,,, and. 1 State total. 19.10 7,20 September 2009 12 NASS, USDA

200 200 200 200 2007 200 200 200 200 2007 Year Year 1 Revised. 2 Excludes distributed fish. Percent of total sold. Live Haulers Trout: 12" or Longer Percent Sold by Point of First Sale, United States, 200-2007 1 2 Fee/Rec Fishing Other Producers Government Percent Percent Percent Percent Direct to Consumer 1. 2...9.2 Processors 2 17. 20. 1. 17.0 Restaurant & Retail 1.8 1.8 1.. Other Percent Percent Percent Percent. 2.1.1 2.. 8. 7.. 71.. 1. 1. 2.. 2.0 1. 0. 1. 0.1 2.1 0. 200 200 200 200 2007 200 200 200 200 2007 Year Year 1 Revised. 2 Excludes distributed fish. Percent of total sold. Live Haulers Trout: "-12" Percent Sold by Point of First Sale, United States, 200-2007 1 2 Fee/Rec Fishing Other Producers Government Percent Percent Percent Percent Direct to Consumer..7.7.8 12. Processors 2. 9.9 2. 8.0.8 Restaurant & Retail 12.0 11.. 1.9 1.8 Other Percent Percent Percent Percent.8 1 8.0 1 12.0 1.7 2.1..0 0. 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7 19. 7.9 12.....1 2.1 September 2009 1 NASS, USDA

CT ME MA TN State Number Trout, Intended for Sale: Number and Pounds by State and United States, 200-2007 200 200 200 Pounds Number Pounds Number Pounds 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 22 7 1 2,080 11 87 28 102 1,210 2 1 9 2 189 1 11 21 70 1 2,00 1 20 17 9 1 1 2 0 7 89 127 1 1,90 22 17 111 270 10,7 19 7 1 17 212 128 18 8 17,7 7 10 1 1,2 180 29 2 0 79 9 878 90 27,100 9 10 109 7 22 1,0 8 8 10 1,020 191 298 2 2, 1 7 11 9 1,077 12 21 1 19 180 2 72 US 1 State 28,8 Number,0 21,892,8 200 2 2007 Pounds Number 2,12 Pounds 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 20 1 2,0 0 102 1,80 100 7 191 01 10 27 80 9 12,1 2 27 92 7 27 121 7 27 21 29 90 27,7 82 1,9 2 80 9 9 171,00 12 28,08 9 1,2 00 7 2 109 2 0 Oth Sts 1,81 178 1 181 US 2,8 1 20 State total for 200-200. All States for 200-2007.,9 2,879,82 2 Revised. Other States include State estimates not shown. September 2009 NASS, USDA

200 200 200 200 2 2007 200 200 200 200 2 2007 Year Year Number Trout, Intended for Sale: Number and Pounds by Cause, United States, 200-2007 1 Disease Theft Chemicals Drought Pounds Number Pounds Number Pounds Number 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 2,71 1,92 1,9 29,80 28,108 Number,900,870 2,19,112,9 1 8 2 107 0 19 22 2 2 9 2 2 2 1 1 78 2,188 9 1,2 Flood Predators Other Pounds Number Pounds Number Pounds Number 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 2 2, 2 272 9 102 1,02 70 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 20 State total for 200-200, US total for 200-2007. 2 Revised.,10 2,17 2,7 1,0 2,70 772 82 700 9 91 7 718,18 92 19 211 1,0 28 28,8 21,892 2,12 2,8 2,879 Pounds Pounds 1 110 1,097 28 77,0,8,00,9,82 September 2009 1 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 12" or Longer CT ME MA TN Number of Fish Distributed Trout by Size Category, by State and United States, 200-200 Live Weight Average Pounds per Fish Sales Average Value per Pound 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1 200 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pounds 1,000 Pounds Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars Dollars Dollars,70 80 2 0 0 91 1,0 92 28 90 1 20 71,000 7 0 7 10 12 8,10 80 0 8 2 290 109 0 1. 2.0 1. 2.9 1. 1. 2.1 8,0 20 17 29 1 112,77 192 82 78 1.9 2.7.0 2.88.0 2.9 1.0 2.0 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.0 Oth Sts 2,901 2,90,88 2,028 0.7 9,7, 2..2 US 11,92 7,8 9,81,289 19,18 1, 2.00 2. Fish " - 12" CT ME MA TN 2,010 2,90 7,80 710 11 2,20,10,00 900,720,180 2,90,020 2,20 70 2,78,200,20,0,70 2,880 80 1,10 1,90 19 7 90 2,10 78 0 9 0 1,00 1,200 80 20 2 1,0 2,90 877 1,120 79 0. 0.2 0. 0.1 0.1 0. 0.1 2,081,70 2,702 2,12,777 1,9,11 1, 2,7,780 1,97 1,201,7 7,170,920 1,19 2.2.80 1.0 2.0 2.70.10.0.01 2.7.1 2..90 2.9.00.0.8 Oth Sts 2 11,0 11,9,27,99 12,01 1,1.1.2 US See footnote(s) at end of table.,80 2,11 1,779,1,19 0,710 2. 2.88 --continued September 2009 1 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 1" - " CT ME MA TN Number of Fish Distributed Trout by Size Category, by State and United States, 200-200 (continued) Live Weight Average per 1,000 Fish Sales Average Value per 1,000 Fish 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1 200 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pounds 1,000 Pounds Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars Dollars Dollars,20,10 10,00 20 00,720,900 18,00,20,70 8,880 21,00 20,800,20 19,800 2,070 2 10 19 8 80 12 17 98 8 200 170 122 199 11.8 2 18.9 1..0 1.9 2 9. 18.7 10.2 22. 7.9 1.0 17.1 2.2 10.1 21.7 9 1,218 1 22 07 1 1,21 9 1 87 77 17.80 190.00.0 29.80 28.20 11.00 2.00 10.00 2.0 0.70.70 182.00 Oth Sts 2,890 8,70 17 29 2..0 1,792,0 20.09 1.87 US,20 7,80 1,09 1,18 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Other States include States suppressed due to disclosure. 20 State total. Due to disclosure, the sum of individual States may not equal the total. 1. 1.,729,08 7.0 8.0 Northeast South and Central West Region 2 Distributed Trout Eggs by Region and United States, 200-200 1 Number of Eggs Average Value per 1,000 Eggs Value of Sales 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 Dollars Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 9,000 82,200.0 1.0 8 1,2 US 7,00 111,99 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Data published at the regional level to avoid disclosure of individual operations. Regions are defined as follows - Northeast: CT, MA, ME,, ; South:,,, TN,, and ; Central:,, and ; West:,,,,, and. 20 State total. Due to disclosure, the sum of individual regions may not equal the total. 1.00 17.0 1,21 1,9 September 2009 17 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 12" or Longer CT 2 ME 2 MA 2 TN 2 Number of Fish Distributed Trout by Size Category, by State and United States, 200-200 1 Live Weight Average Pounds per Fish Sales Average Value per Pound 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pounds 1,000 Pounds Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars Dollars Dollars 2,20 120 128 87 90 280 00 122 1,910 170 0 0 0 10 27 00 12 22 1,970 10 117 8 77 0 2 8 2 1,00 17 0 0 20 2 0 18 1. 1.9 1. 1. 1.,78 08 81 1,88 8 1,22 998 19 107,78 17 8 1,277 87 1,12 79 2.1 2.99 0.9.00 9.2 2.90.1.12 2.99 2.2 8.7.0. 2..0 2.19 Oth Sts 2,79,0 2,01,78,92,9 2.8.8 US,19 8,0,91 7,222 1,82 2,82 2.8.28 Fish " - 12" CT 2 ME 2 MA 2 TN 2,770,070 7,280 770 20 2,170,90,00,10,00,00 7,80,0,90,100 7,20,00,700,200,80 1,90 1,210 1,80 207 7 01 1,870 2,70 780 1,280 0 2,90 1,0 1,820 1,20 1,80 2,70 80 1,80 1 0.2 0. 0.2 0.2 0.1 0. 0.2 0.2,72,71,07 08 727,2 8,8,20 1,00,992, 2,020,21 7,08 11,09 2,11,0 2,07 2..10 1.7.0 1..17.2.9 2.7 2. 1.7.9.02 2..0. Oth Sts,82 21,289,7 7,90 21,98 28,8.82.8 US See footnote(s) at end of table. 8,0 9,289 18, 2,2,8 7,197 2.98.18 --continued September 2009 18 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 1" - " CT 2 ME 2 MA 2 TN 2 Number of Fish Distributed Trout by Size Category, by State and United States, 200-200 1 (continued) Live Weight Average per 1,000 Fish Sales Average Value per 1,000 Fish 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 Pounds 1,000 Pounds Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars Dollars Dollars 8,0,20 7,20 18 20,910,20 9,870 2,80 2,980,810 0,200 1,20,00 2,180,870 12,00,280 7 17 1 2 2 1 2 20 0 2 20 1 117 18 20 7 17.0 2. 22.7 11.9.8.8 2. 2. 2 18.1 2 8. 9.2. 2.8 28. 22.9 89 2 8 29 817 89 1 1 1,18 1,01 7 71 7 807.0 81.0.0 70.00 209.00 90.0.00.0 170.00 9.70 11.00 19.00 29.00 10.00 1.0 2.00 Oth Sts 12,807 1,89 291 2. 2 2,2 1,19 207.8 8.1 US 8,0 81, 1,7 1,9 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Estimates discontinued in 200. Other States include State estimates not shown and States suppressed due to disclosure. 20 State total for 200, US total for 200. 2.7 17.1,1 7,0 109.00 9.80 Northeast South and Central West Region 2 Distributed Trout Eggs by Region and United States, 200-200 1 Number of Eggs Average Value per 1,000 Eggs Value of Sales 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,000 1,000 Dollars Dollars 1,000 Dollars 1,000 Dollars 72,020 9,0 2.0 1.70 1,77 1,2 US 11,212 12,100 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Revised. 2 Data published at the regional level to avoid disclosure of individual operations. Regions for 200 are defined as follows - Northeast: CT, MA, ME,, and ; South:,,, TN,, and ; Central:,, and ; West:,,,,, and. Regions for 200 are the same as 200 but excludes CT, MA, ME, and TN. 20 State total for 200, 1 State total for 200. Due to disclosure, the sum of individual regions may not equal the total. 2.20 18.00 2,2 2,28 September 2009 19 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 12" or Longer Number of Fish Distributed Trout by Size Category, by State and United States, 2007 Live Weight Average Pounds per Fish Sales Average Value per Pound 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 1,000 1,000 Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars Dollars,270 0 17 0 12 1,20 2 20 182 0.7 2.2,818 0 7 1, 7 2 1.79 1..79 2..0.29 Oth Sts 1,90,7 10,921.18 US 8,8 7,727 19,28 2.9 Fish " - 12" 7,10,870 2,70 9,180 10,00,90 2,200 1,0 1,100,00 2,100 9 0. 0.2 0.1,78,201,77 21,712 7,02 2,1 2. 2.71.07.72.2.90 Oth Sts 1 2,80 10,7,20.1 US See footnote(s) at end of table. 71,90 22, 79,179.9 --continued September 2009 20 NASS, USDA

Size Category and State Fish 1" - " Number of Fish Distributed Trout by Size Category, by State and United States, 2007 (continued) Live Weight Average Pounds per 1,000 Fish Average Sales Average Value per 1,000 Fish 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 1,000 1,000 Pounds Pounds 1,000 Dollars Dollars 2,00 29,700 2,10,80 7,170,000 18 1,200 101 20 2 10 70.0 8.7 2.0.8.0 107,8 1 1,9 82 12 12 1 00 11 20 Oth Sts 1 2,181 1,00 2.9 7,21 227 US 81,891,101 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Other States include State estimates not shown and States suppressed due to disclosure. 7.9,10 17 Northeast South and Central West Region 2 Distributed Trout Eggs by Region and United States, 2007 1 Number of Eggs Average Value per 1,000 Eggs Value of Sales 2007 2007 2007 1,000 1,000 Dollars 89,998 19.20 1,72 US 12,2 Not published to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 1 Data published at the regional level to avoid disclosure of individual operations. 2 Regions for 2007 are defined as follows - Northeast:, and ; South:,,,, and ; Central:,, and ; West:,,,,, and. 1 State total. 19.80 2, September 2009 21 NASS, USDA

Reliability of Trout Production Estimates Survey Procedures: Data for trout production are collected from all known producers. Individual NASS field offices maintain a list of all known trout producers and use known sources of producers to update their lists. All known trout producers are mailed a questionnaire as close as possible to January 1 and given adequate time to respond by mail. Those that do not respond by mail are telephoned or possibly enumerated in person during the middle of January. Care is exercised to ensure all operations are accounted for. Estimation Procedures: Sound statistical methodology is employed to derive the estimates from reported data. All data are analyzed for unusual values. Data from each operation are compared to their own past operating profile and to trends from similar operations. Data for missing operations were estimated based on similar operations or historical data. NASS field offices prepare these estimates by using a combination of survey indications and historic trends. Individual State estimates are reviewed by the for reasonableness. Revision policy: Estimates for the previous year are subject to revision when current estimates are made. Revisions are the result of late or corrected data. Reliability: Trout production estimates are based on a census of all known active producers and therefore, have no sampling variability. However, estimates are subject to errors such as omissions, duplication, and mistakes in reporting, recording, and processing the data. While these errors cannot be measured directly, they are minimized through strict quality controls in the data collection process and a careful review of all reported data for consistency and reasonableness. Terms and Definitions Used for Trout Production Estimates 12" or Longer Fish: Grown commercially for food, usually weighing from three-fourths to one and one-half pounds. "- 12" Fish: Usually stockers that weigh less than three-fourths of a pound. They may be sold as foodsize fish. Fingerlings: Fish usually from 1 to inches long. Live Haulers: Person who buys live fish on the farm and functions as a middleman. Chemicals: Includes losses from pesticides or herbicide poisoning. Disease: Includes losses from both parasitic and bacterial caused sickness. Drought: Includes losses from lack of water causing oxygen depletion. Floods: Includes losses from too much water washing the fish away. Predators: Includes losses from mink, otters, birds, and other animals. Theft/Vandalism: The unauthorized removal of fish and/or the destruction of property causing a loss of fish by intentional acts by persons known or unknown. September 2009 22 NASS, USDA

Information Contacts Listed below are the commodity specialists in the Livestock Branch of the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additional information. Dan Kerestes, Chief, Livestock Branch... (202) 720-70 Bruce Boess, Head, Poultry and Specialty Commodities Section... (202) 720-7 David Colwell - Cold Storage... (202) 720-878 Doug Bounds - Poultry Slaughter, Turkey Hatchery, Turkeys Raised... (202) 90-27 Chris Hawthorn - Catfish Processing, Catfish Production, Trout Production, Census of Aquaculture, Egg Products, Mink... (202) 720-08 Kim Linonis - Layers, Eggs... (202) 90-82 Troy Marshall - Broiler Hatchery, Chicken Hatchery, Honey... (202) 720-2 September 2009 2 NASS, USDA

ACCESS TO REPTS!! For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data products, and services: INTERNET ACCESS All NASS reports are available free of charge. For free access, connect to the Internet and go to the NASS Home Page at: www.nass.usda.gov. E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION All NASS reports are available by subscription free of charge direct to your e-mail address. Starting with the NASS Home Page at www.nass.usda.gov, under the right navigation, Receive reports by Email, click on National or State. Follow the instructions on the screen. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRINTED REPTS DATA PRODUCTS LL OUR TOLL-FREE DER DESK: 800-999-779 (U.S. and Canada) Other areas, please call 70-0-220 FAX: 70-0-900 (Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASSISTAE For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about NASS or its products or services, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at 800-727-90, 7:0 a.m. to :00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: nass@nass.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA s TGET Center at (202) 720-200 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 00 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 2020-910, or call (800) 79-272 (voice) or (202) 720-82 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

USDA Data Users Meeting Monday, November 2, 2009 Crowne Plaza Hotel Chicago-Metro Chicago, Illinois 01 (12) 829-000 The USDA s National Agricultural Statistics Service will be organizing an open forum for data users. The purpose will be to provide updates on pending changes in the various statistical and information programs and seeks comments and input from data users. Other USDA agencies to be represented will include the Agricultural Marketing Service, the Economic Research Service, the Foreign Agricultural Service, and World Agricultural Outlook Board. The Foreign Trade Division from the Census Bureau will also be included in the meeting. For registration details or additional information for the Data Users Meeting, see the NASS homepage at www.nass.usda.gov/forum/ or contact Marjorie Taylor (NASS) at (202) 90-81 or at marjorie_taylor@nass.usda.gov. This Data Users Meeting precedes an Industry Outlook Conference that will be held at the same location on Tuesday, November, 2009. The Outlook Conference brings together analysts from various commodity sectors to discuss the outlook situation. For registration details or additional information for the Industry Outlook Meeting see the Livestock and Marketing Information Center (LC) homepage at www.lmic.info or contact Jim Robb at (720) -291 or at robb@lmic.info.