AOGA Educational Seminar Endangered Species Act Permitting Legal Challenges Trends Jeff Leppo Stoel Rives LLP December 11, 2012 Anchorage, AK jwleppo@stoel.com 1
ESA Overview "My lawyer finally got me on the endangered-species list!" 2
The ESA Basics The ESA authorizes the Secretaries of Interior and Commerce to conserve fish, wildlife and plants facing extinction by: (1) listing species as threatened or endangered (2) designating critical habitat (3) enforcing the prohibition on take of listed species (4) Consulting to ensure that actions funded or authorized by federal agencies do not jeopardize listed species or adversely modify critical habitat 3
The ESA Basics Procedural and substantive requirements Implemented by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (the Services ) 4
ESA Listing Identifying species for possible designation as endangered or threatened A citizen may petition the FWS or NMFS The Services may identify species through internal studies and discussions Subpopulations may be listed as a Distinct Population Segment (DPS) if both discreet and significant 5
Key Definition Endangered Species Any species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range Bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) 6
Key Definition Threatened Species Any species likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future Spectacled Eider (Somateria fischeri) 7
ESA Listing Criteria 1. Present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of species range or habitat 2. Over-use for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes 3. Disease or predation 4. Inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms 5. Other natural or man-made factors affecting continued existence of species 8
ESA Listing Steps Petition 90-day finding on Petition Species status review 12-month finding Proposed listing Final listing Designation of critical habitat Recovery plan 9
ESA Listings - Alaska 8 marine mammals Polar bear Northern sea otter (DPS) Steller sea lion (2 DPSs) Bowhead whale Fin whale Humpback whale Cook Inlet beluga whale (DPS) 4 birds Short-tailed albatross Spectacled eider Steller s eider (DPS) Eskimo curlew (extirpated) 1 terrestrial mammal Canadian Lynx 1 plant Aleutian shield fern Others (uncommon) Leatherback sea turtle Blue whale North Pacific right whale Sei whale Loggerhead sea turtle Green sea turtle Sperm whale 3 candidate species Pacific walrus Kittlitz s murrelet Yellow-billed loon 2 proposed species Ringed seal Bearded seal 1 species being reconsidered Ringed seal 10
11
Key Definition - Take Includes harassing, harming, injuring or killing listed species Harm includes significant habitat alteration which actually kills or injures fish or wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns 12
Take of Listed Species Is Prohibited ESA take prohibitions immediately apply when species are listed as endangered ESA take prohibitions do not automatically apply to threatened species FWS has adopted a general 4(d) rule applying take prohibitions subject to species specific limitations NMFS adopts species specific 4(d) regulations that apply or limit application of the take prohibition 13
Prerequisite to ESA Take Authority Take authority under the ESA for listed marine mammals cannot be obtained without an MMPA take (negligible impact) authorization 14
Takings Exceptions Alaska Natives for subsistence purposes Self Defense actions to protect yourself or any human from bodily harm 15
Critical Habitat Use best scientific data to identify areas essential to conservation of species, and that may require special management Economic impact analysis required; areas may be excluded from protection based upon that analysis and consideration of other relevant factors if benefits of exclusion outweigh benefits of designation Notice and public comment Designation does not create a park or preserve, but does complicate activities within the habitat area 16
Key Definition Critical Habitat Specific geographic areas with physical and biological features essential to the conservation of a listed species and that may require special management 17
Polar Bear Critical Habitat Dec. 7, 2010 (75 FR 76086) 187,000 square miles Sea ice habitat Terrestrial denning habitat Barrier Island habitat Service admits no conservation benefit ESA and MMPA adequately protective FWS will not use to regulate GHG emissions Service recognized O&G activities are not a threat 18
Cook Inlet Beluga Whale Critical Habitat (proposed) Nearshore foraging and calving (Area 1) Near and offshore feeding and transit (Area 2) Economic analysis estimates under $600K in impacts Underestimates costs, delays, regional impact 19 19
Potential Bearded & Ringed Seal Habitat 20
Future Walrus Critical Habitat? 21
Section 7 Consultation Purpose is to ensure that actions authorized, funded or carried out by federal agencies are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species, or to destroy or adversely modify critical habitat. 22
Key Definition Jeopardy Jeopardizing the continued existence of a species means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species 23
Section 7 Consultation If agency action may affect a listed species or critical habitat, the agency must initiate consultation with the Services Private entities are affected by Section 7 when their activities require federal permits or authorizations, or federal funding 24
Informal Consultation Summary Federal Action No Effect = no consultation May Affect Listed Species Develop biological assessment Not likely to adversely affect Likely to adversely affect End of Informal Consultation Go to Formal Consultation Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Statement 25
Formal Consultation Biological opinion evaluating the action Two possible outcomes: 1. No jeopardy opinion federal action not likely to jeopardize species or adversely modify critical habitat Issuance of incidental take statement Imposition of reasonable and prudent measures to minimize take 26
Formal Consultation 2. Jeopardy Opinion federal action likely to jeopardize species or adversely modify critical habitat Identifies reasonable and prudent alternatives that avoid jeopardy or adverse modifications 27
Endangered Species Act Trends Climate change-based listings, and related critical habitat designations, for currently abundant arctic species, pose new resource use challenges The ESA regulatory process, particularly as interrelated with NEPA and MMPA regulatory process, poses important schedule discipline and substantive legal challenges Change and uncertainty, conflicting and competing priorities, and new listings and critical habitat designations will continue to be confounding factors 28
Resource Development Permitting Challenges 2013 engo initiatives will continue to proliferate and to complicate Alaska resource development, but their strategies will evolve Nearly every significant federal permitting decision, including project-specific decisions, are likely to be challenged NEPA, ESA, CAA, CWA, MMPA will continue to be primary legal battlegrounds Responsible federal officials will not be nimble in anticipating and responding to these circumstances 29
Important Trends engo challenges and federal decisions are being heavily influenced by the so-called precautionary principle. Reliable published data and analysis is essential. Actual data will demonstrate that conservatively biased assumptions are not reasonable. The State of Alaska can serve a critically important role in advancing science-based decision-making. 30