NCTCOG 16-County Crash and Fatality Data

Similar documents
NCTCOG 16-County Crash and Fatality Data

NCTCOG 16-County Crash and Fatality Data

North Central Texas Council of Governments - Roadway Safety Program Area

REGIONAL SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Council Room Friday, April 27, :00 am 12:00 pm

Traffic Incident Management. Business Case Study. Co-location of Arizona Department of Public Safety and Department of Transportation

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

Best Southwest Transportation Committee. North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department

BASS PRO DRIVE TO: WEST OF FARM-TO-MARKET ROAD (FM)

Public Hearing Tarrant County. October 11 th, 2012

Urban Search and Rescue. An undaunting task that only a handful can accomplish

6/14/2013. Welcome. to the US 75 Corridor Study. Public Meeting. US 75 Corridor Study Area

Purdue Road Show IN-TIME Executive Session March 8, 2016

New Jersey State Police / New Jersey Department of Transportation Incident Management Partnership

Dallas Trail Safety Initiatives. Quality of Life Committee February 14, 2011 Park and Recreation Department

DALLAS FORT WORTH. There are several congested sections of road that do not have a logical big fix solution.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Kansas Department of Transportation Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Intersections

REGIONAL SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Council Room Friday, October 26, :00 am AGENDA

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP): Project Overview & Preliminary Findings. April 15, 2016

Characteristics of Fatal Pedestrian Crashes on Freeways. Kay Fitzpatrick Texas A&M Transportation Institute

COMMUNITY SCHOOLS AND TRANSPORTATION

Traffic Safety Plan Traffic Safety Plan 2015

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

BICYCLE PUBLIC HEARING INTRODUCTION. Kathy Kleinschmidt, P.E. Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator Dallas District

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

GENERAL DESCRIPTION. Page 1 of 5

ENGINEERING DRIVER SAFETY INTO PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT SOME OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION IS OUTDATED SO IT IS ABLE TO SHOW CHANGES IN THE PLAN OVER TIME.

Everyone is a Pedestrian

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Workshop JUNE 2, 2016

NHI Course Managing Traffic Incidents and Roadway Emergencies Module 14. Quick Clearance Techniques 14-1

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Automated Traffic Enforcement Technology Guidelines

Closing Plenary Session

Sarasota - Manatee Traffic Incident Management Team October 7, 2014 Meeting Minutes

Roadway Safety S.O.G. and Training Outline. Captain Rodney J. Palmer. Oak Creek Fire Department

Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona

SHSP Action Plan Development. Intersection EA Team

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE:

DRIVING ZERO FATALITIES TO A REALITY ILLINOIS LOCAL SAFETY INITIATIVE

road safety issues 2002 road trauma for TNZ Region Two July 2003 Road deaths Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues

Mineral Avenue Corridor Assessment. ITE 2017 Western District Annual Meeting San Diego, CA June 21 st

100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas

Road Safety Audit Course Participant Guidebook. August 22 & 23, Cleveland Avenue Columbus, Ohio

Hillsborough Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 2015 Update. Hillsborough MPO BPAC May 2015

PHOTOVOICE for Pedestrian Safety: Students Saving Lives One Block at a Time. Marissa A Rodriguez Jimma Njoku Shelli Stephens-Stidham

Officer Safety Webinar

Orange County Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Enhancement Program. City of San Juan Capistrano April 17, 2012

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

RSTF Measurements and Status

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Speed Management Action Plan

Pedestrian Safety Campaign

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON APRIL 25, 2016

2009 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT: Six Congestion Reduction Strategies and Their. Effects on Mobility

100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas

Pedestrian-Bicycle Emphasis Area Breakout Session. Highway Safety Summit April 26, 2016

US 69 RELIEF ROUTE STUDY

Shenango Valley MPO. State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development

Glossary of Terms. ABANDONMENT The permanent cessation of rail activity on a given line of railroad.

road safety issues 2002 road trauma for Tauranga District July 2003 Regional crash causes Estimated social cost of crashes*

Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2014 Crash Data Report

GUIDELINES FOR EMERGENCY TRAFFIC CONTROL

Texas Strategic Highway Safety Plan Update. 2 nd Emphasis Area Team Meeting Older Road Users 3/7/2017 Austin, TX

Safety Performance Management Target Setting. Data: Fatalities and Serious Injuries

An Easier Commute. Learn how to use I-77 Express to save you time.

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

YELLOWHEAD TRAIL / 149 STREET INTERCHANGE

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

Lane Area Transportation Safety and Security Plan Vulnerable Users Focus Group

10 Year Plan Cost/Revenue Matrix for the Dallas Fort Worth Region FY 2017 FY 2028

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

MOBILITY RESULTS AREA. Budgeting For Outcomes Council Presentation January 12, 2007

APPENDIX G Lane Departure Action Plan

8. Collisions INTRODUCTION

I-635 LBJ EAST PROJECT

COLLISION STATISTICS May Engineering Services Box 5008, th Avenue Red Deer, AB T4N 3T4

Technology and the Changing Face of Tollways

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2007 June 2011 (All ages) Mode of travel

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

RM 620 FEASIBILITY STUDY

Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Bicycle Safety Action Plan

Wichita TMC Support- Monthly Incident Report for October 2018

Preliminary Findings for Texas s North Central Texas Council of Governments Region

Transportation and Health Tool

FHWA Resources for Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals

MINERAL AVENUE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT STUDY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Transcription:

North Central Texas Council of Governments - Traffic Safety Crash and Fatality Statistics NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (NCTCOG) 2013 Safety Program Performance Measures NCTCOG 16-County Crash and Fatality Data 2011-2013 NCTCOG staff receives regional crash data from TxDOT s Crash Records Information System (CRIS) annually. The collected data will help identify crash hotspots and assist in the development of improvement strategies for the locations. The performance measures below highlight reportable crashes and fatalities that occurred in the North Texas region in 2011, 2012 and 2013. The data below indicates that in 2013 the NCTCOG region experienced one crash every five minutes and one fatality every 15 hours. 2011-2013 Crashes County 2011 2012 2013 % Change 2012 to 2013 Collin 9,024 9,406 10,419 10.77% Dallas 34,955 36,082 40,330 11.77% Denton 6,979 7,634 8,975 17.57% Ellis 1,841 1,801 1,858 3.16% Erath 550 558 500-10.39% Hood 698 633 638 0.79% Hunt 1,060 1,037 949-8.49% Johnson 2,039 1,947 2,010 3.24% Kaufman 1,322 1,335 1,388 3.97% Navarro 983 930 968 4.09% Palo Pinto 435 495 535 8.08% Parker 1,626 1,613 1,804 11.84% Rockwall 901 982 1,026 4.48% Somervell 131 135 141 4.44% Tarrant 24,006 25,419 27,595 8.56% Wise 801 837 903 7.89% Total 87,351 90,844 100,039 10.12% 2011-2013 Fatalities County 2011 2012 Source (Crashes and Fatalities): TxDOT's Crash Records Information System (CRIS) current as of 1/31/2014- All TxDOT disclaimers apply to this information. Note: A reportable motor vehicle crash is defined by TxDOT as: Any crash involving a motor vehicle in transport that occurs or originates on a traffic way, results in injury to or death of any person, or damage to property of any one person to the apparent extent of $1,000. 2013 % Change 2012 to 2013 Collin 34 47 41-12.77% Dallas 168 173 218 26.01% Denton 27 34 40 17.65% Ellis 16 12 19 58.33% Erath 6 7 10 42.86% Hood 5 8 5-37.50% Hunt 19 22 15-31.82% Johnson 16 20 18-10.00% Kaufman 15 27 12-55.56% Navarro 1 8 13 62.50% Palo Pinto 8 7 11 57.14% Parker 18 20 18-10.00% Rockwall 4 12 8-33.33% Somervell 3 5 6 20.00% Tarrant 134 107 139 29.91% Wise 13 19 10-47.37% Total 487 528 583 10.42% 2013 NCTCOG Total Crashes vs. Bike/Ped Crashes 2013 NCTCOG Total Crashes vs. Crash Severity 2012 NCTCOG Total Crashes vs. Bike/Ped Crashes

NCTCOG Crash and Fatality Data 2013 2013 Contributing Factors for Serious Injury and Fatality Crashes Top Ten Contributing Factors Percentage 1 Speeding - (Overlimit / Unsafe Speed / Failed to Control Speed) 27.99% 2 Driver Related (Distraction in Vehicle / Driver Inattention / Drove Without Headlights / Road Rage) 10.65% 3 Faulty Evasive Action 7.99% 4 Changed Lane When Unsafe 7.28% 5 Followed Too Closely 7.16% 6 Failed to Drive in Single Lane 6.15% 7 Under Influence - (Had Been Drinking / Alcohol / Drug) 5.96% 8 Disregard Traffic Control (Stop and Go Signal / Stop Sign or Light) 5.75% 9 Failed to Yield ROW - (Turn on Red / Open Intersection / Private Drive / To Pedestrian / Stop Sign / Yield Sign / Turning Left) 4.34% 10 Fatigued or Asleep 1.65% Note: The Contributing Factor Analysis above includes Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Contributing Crash Factors on limited access facilities in the NCTCOG 12-County MPA. 2013 Crash Rates by County In 2009, NCTCOG began calculating crash rates on limited access facilities for the NCTCOG 12-County MPA. The first phase was focused on developing a limited access facility crash rate for the individual counties and developing a limited access facility crash rate for the region as a whole. The map below displays crash rates by county in comparison to the 2013 regional crash rate of 78.74 crashes per 100 million vehicle miles traveled. Counties that have a higher crash rate than the regional rate are shown in red, while counties with a rate below the regional crash rate are shown in green.

2012 Crash Rates by CMP Corridor Segment Crash Rates by Corridor To assist with the 2013 Congestion Management Process (CMP) update, crash rates were calculated for 93 limited access facility corridor segments using 2012 crash data. The average corridor segment crash rate was 75.19 indicating there s an of average 75.19 crashes per 100 million vehicle miles traveled. The map below displays corridor segments that are above (red) or below (green) the average crash rate of all corridor segments. The table below highlights the top 10 crash rates by corridor segment as included in the CMP 2013 Update. More information on each individual corridor analysis is included in Appendix C of the CMP 2013 Update. http://www.nctcog.org/trans/cmp/index.asp 2012 Crash Rates / Corridor Rank Highway From To VMT Crashes Crash Rate 1 IH-635 DNT US-75 848,431 629 203.11 2 IH-30 I-35E US-80 1,693,845 1133 183.26 3 IH-35E N. Garden Ridge SH-121 940,871 616 179.37 4 IH-635 I-35E DNT 1,058,378 686 177.58 5 IH-20 S Hulen St I-35W 587,390 349 162.78 6 IH-35E I-30 Ledbetter Rd 1,152,159 684 162.65 7 IH-820 I-30 US-287 410,051 240 160.35 8 DNT PGBT I-635 1,062,054 618 159.42 9 SH-360 I-30 I-20 975,571 537 150.81 10 IH-35W I-820 I-30 758,999 405 146.19

NCTCOG Freeway Incident Management (FIM) Program Regional Incident Management Performance Measure Definitions In May 2013, NCTCOG staff held a workshop with regional partner agencies and first responders to build consensus on regional incident management performance measures. During the workshop, the following regional definitions were agreed upon: Incident Clearance Time The time between the first recordable awareness of an incident and the time at which the last responder has left the scene. Roadway Clearance Time The time between the first recordable awareness of an incident by the responding agency and the time at which all lanes are available for traffic flow. Secondary Crash Incidents beginning with the time of detection of the primary incident where a collision occurs either a) within the incident scene or b) within the queue, including the opposite direction, resulting from the original incident. Recovery Time The time between the first recordable awareness of an incident and the restoration of impacted roadway/ roadways to normal operations. 2013 Regional Crash Pyramid The statistics below show the importance of training for agencies responsible for managing and clearing traffic incidents is extremely important, as well as consistency among agencies, and has demonstrated the ability to improve responder and motorist safety and to significantly reduce the length and size of roadway closures. On average, each injury crash requires 2 Law Enforcement 4 Fire/Rescue 2 Emergency Medical Services 1 Towing and Recovery 9 Responders Potentially 36 responders working in or near moving traffic every hour 24/7/365

NCTCOG Freeway Incident Management (FIM) Program First Responder and Manager s Course/Executive Level Course Training The Freeway Incident Management (FIM) training series was developed in February of 2003 and first offered in December of 2003. The goal of the FIM training course is to initiate a common, coordinated response to traffic incidents that will build partnerships, enhance safety for emergency personnel, reduce upstream traffic accidents, improve the efficiency of the transportation system, and improve the air quality in the Dallas-Fort Worth region. The First Responder and Manager s Course is specifically designed for those with daily involvement in responding to traffic incidents on the region s freeways. This course is offered at least six times per year. NCTCOG recently updated the course material in partnership with FHWA to ensure the NCTCOG FIM Course is equivalent with the Strategic Highway Research Project 2 (SHRP2) National Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Program Course. First Responder and Manager s Course Attendance 2003-2012 2013 January and March 2014 Total 2,131 183 49 2,363 First Responder and Manager s Course Attendance - Police A similar map for agencies with Fire Attendance is also available upon request. The Executive Level Course was introduced in 2005 and is geared towards agency decision makers and policy makers and provides a highlevel overview of the topics discussed in the First Responder and Manager s Course. The Executive Level Course is offered twice a year. Executive Level Course Attendance Police Fire City Staff Elected Officials Public Works/ Strategic Services Transportation Medical Staff Other Total (February 2005 - November 2013) 212 82 17 13 13 3 71 411 Photogrammetry Training 2007-2013 Photogrammetry Training is offered as a complement to the region s FIM Training series. The Photogrammetry System, used for crash reconstruction and forensic measurements, is an image-based 3D system that calculates measurements from photographs and digital images. The System helps reduce the time needed to investigate a crash scene. The following training is offered twice a year: Basic Training - five-days (includes a three-day iwitness workshop and a two-day Crash Zone workshop) Advanced Training - two-days (offered to students who completed Basic Training) Course Total Basic Training 135 Advanced Training 78

NCTCOG Freeway Incident Management (FIM) Program Incident Management Commitment Level Survey NCTCOG recently released an Incident Management Commitment Level Tracking Survey to regional partners. The purpose of the survey is to gather information on our partner agencies commitment to incident management. The release of this survey is a part of our continued efforts to emphasize the importance of effective incident management goals and objectives throughout the region. The submittal of this survey will be a scoring factor in the upcoming 2014 Incident Management Equipment Purchase Call for Projects, which will be released later this year. The results of the survey are as follows: Regional Agency Survey Response Map

Mobility Assistance Patrol Program (MAPP) The Mobility Assistance Patrol Program (MAPP) is an essential element to the region s Freeway Incident Management operations. The MAPP coverage area is focused on congested roadway systems in Dallas and Tarrant Counties and portions of Collin and Denton Counties. The goal of the Regional MAPP is to assist in the alleviation of congestion on area highways/freeways and toll roads. The MAPP provides free assistance to stalled and stranded motorists by helping them to move disabled vehicles from the main lanes of regional highway/freeway facilities, assisting with flat tires, stalled vehicles, and minor accidents and ultimately getting the vehicles operating or off the facility completely. Assistance is also provided to law enforcement with traffic control when deemed necessary or when requested by law enforcement. MAPP is currently being operated by the Dallas County Sheriff s Office, Tarrant County Sheriff's Office and the North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA). Portions of Dallas and Tarrant County Operations are currently being patrolled by private sector partner agencies on particular corridors while they are under construction. This may reflect a decrease in assist numbers. We are currently not receiving performance stats from the private sector partner agencies. Mobility Assistance Patrol Program Performance Measures Agency 2012 Assists 2013 Assist Dallas County 68,303 62,356 Tarrant County 23,729 20,164 NTTA 32,531 37,998 Patrol Routes Hours of Operation Dallas County Tarrant County NTTA CDA (NTE) CDA (LBJ) CDA (DFW) Mon - Fri 5 am - 9:30 pm Sat - Sun 11 am - 7:30 pm Mon - Sun Mon - Sun Mon - Sun Mon - Sun 6 am - 10 pm 24 hours/day 24 hours/day 24 hours/day Mon - Fri 5:30 am - 8:30 am Mon - Fri 3:30 pm - 7 pm

Mobility Assistance Patrol Program (MAPP) Roadway 2013 Dallas County Assist Totals by Roadway IH30 IH 35E IH 635 IH 20 US 75 LOOP 12 IH 45 SH 183 US 67 US 175 SPUR 408 US 80 SH 114 SPUR 366 SH 121 DNT SH 310 SH 161 PGBT 3275 3185 1758 1726 1373 1371 894 846 545 53 39 35 24 9 0 2000 8851 7582 4000 6000 10439 10273 10078 8000 10000 12000 Total Assist 2013 Tarrant County Assist Totals by Roadway 5171 I-30 4445 I-35 3794 Roadway I-20 3036 LOOP I-820 2157 STATE HWY 360 559 504 493 STATE HWY 287 STATE HWY 121 STATE HWY 183 3 2 STATE HWY 199 STATE HWY 377 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Total Assist 2013 NTTA Assist Totals by Roadway 20124 PGBT 11378 Roadway DNT 6460 SRT MCLB 16 LLBT 14 AATT 6 0 5000 10000 15000 Total Assist 20000 25000

Wrong Way Driving Pilot Project - Dallas County In 2012, NCTCOG began working with TxDOT and local jurisdictions to implement a Wrong Way Driving (WWD) Pilot Project in Dallas County. The goal was to implement a project that focuses on preventing wrong way driving along regional corridors through the implementation of intersection improvements, signage and/or other available countermeasures. The project will focus on Diamond Interchanges throughout Dallas County. In 2013, intersection inventories were completed to identify signage, striping and signal locations for each intersection. Project design plans were then developed for the individual intersections. 2014 Update: The project let in January, 2014. Work authorizations are being developed for individual intersections. The first group of cities are expected to receive their work authorizations within the next few months. City/Agency Total # of Intersections Identified Carrollton 12 Dallas 199 Farmers Branch 2 Garland 15 Grand Prairie 25 Irving 38 Mesquite 16 Richardson 7 Rowlett 4 TxDOT 37 Total 355 Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) NCTCOG hosted a workshop in June, 2013 on the Highway Safety Improvement Project (HSIP) Call For Projects (CFP). During the workshop TxDOT district engineers from both the Dallas and Fort Worth Districts, provided information to local agencies on the process for submitting project applications as well as types of projects that would be accepted. The CFP resulted in the following projects for our region: The Dallas District received approval on 39 projects for a total of $22,511,138. The Fort Worth District received approval on 11 projects for a total of $22,645,751. 2014 Update: NCTCOG held a workshop in March for the 2014 HSIP call for projects. The deadline to submit projects was April 9, 2014. Strategic Highway Research Program 2 L34 Pilot Project In October 2013, NCTCOG hosted a Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) 2 L34 Pilot Workshop that focused on improving business processes in the area of incident response. The workshop was a component of the SHRP 2 L34 Project which has a primary objective of developing and pilot testing an e-tool for evaluating existing and proposed business processes to improve travel time reliability. The pilot case study is limited to the existing City of Dallas/Dallas County partnership. Representatives from TxDOT Dallas District, Dallas County Sheriff s Office, City of Dallas PD, City of Dallas Fire/EMS and NCTCOG participated in the workshop. Information gathered during the workshop will support a 7-step process that is used to identify business processes that affect travel time reliability outlined in SHRP L34 and SHRP L01. The results of the SHRP 2 research program are expected to help local, state, and national agencies reduce travel time variability for commuters. These efforts are expected to continue in 2014. Contact Information Camille Fountain (817) 704-2521 cfountain@nctcog.org Jory Dille (817) 704-5644 jdille@nctcog.org Sonya Jackson Landrum (817) 695-9273 slandrum@nctcog.org