Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry. Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014

Similar documents
Small Footprint Topo-Bathymetric LiDAR

PACIFIC NORTHWEST TEST OF A HYDROGRAPHIC AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER

LiDAR My favourite tool in the bag 2011 St Kitts & Nevis

Emerging Subsea Networks

THE CHALLENGES OF A LARGE-AREA BATHYMETRIC SURVEY

Advantages of Using Combined Bathymetry and Side Scan Data in Survey Processing T.M. Hiller, L.N. Brisson

Utilizing Vessel Based Mobile LiDAR & Bathymetry Survey Techniques for Survey of Four Southern California Breakwaters

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTION

Bathymetry Data Collection for Subaqueous Soil Mapping. Maggie Payne 2 nd National Workshop on Subaqueous Soils Rhode Island August 9-12, 2010

Boost Your Skills with On-Site Courses Tailored to Your Needs

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Monetisation of sustainable business models for Satellite Derived Bathymetry

Analysis of Wave Predictions from the Coastal Model Test Bed using cbathy

Processing Lidar Data for Charting Applications Understanding the Trade-Offs and Challenges

Total Shallow-Water Survey Through Airborne Hydrography

Data Collection and Processing: Elwha Estuary Survey, February 2013

Pathways Interns: Annika O Dea, Ian Conery, Andrea Albright

Sonar Bathymetry: Waquoit Bay NERR

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

14/10/2013' Bathymetric Survey. egm502 seafloor mapping

RIVET Satellite Remote Sensing and Small Scale Wave Process Analysis

Airborne Laser Bathymetry for Monitoring the German Baltic Sea Coast

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

High Resolution Sea Surface Roughness and Wind Speed with Space Lidar (CALIPSO)

Bathymetry User Needs and Challenges in Australia and New Zealand

Evaluation of the Klein HydroChart 3500 Interferometric Bathymetry Sonar for NOAA Sea Floor Mapping

Airborne Remote Sensing of Surface and Internal Wave Processes on the Inner Shelf

Boothbay Harbor Rotary Club May 12, 2016

Homework 2 Bathymetric Charts [based on the Chauffe & Jefferies (2007)]

Beach Wizard: Development of an Operational Nowcast, Short-Term Forecast System for Nearshore Hydrodynamics and Bathymetric Evolution

Uncertainty Estimates in Satellite Derived Bathymetry

Digital Elevation Models

METHODS PAPER: Downstream Bathymetry and BioBase Analyses of Substrate and Macrophytes

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF JUVENILE BLUEFIN TUNA AGGREGATIONS: A FEASIBILITY STUDY

Certified Professionals in Hydrographic Solutions

Topo-bathymetric Lidar Research for Aquaculture and Coastal Development in Nova Scotia: Final Report

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

Wade Reynolds 1 Frank Young 1,2 Peter Gibbings 1,2. University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba 4350 AUSTRALIA

Hydrographic Surveying at The Port of London

Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards Part 5: Standards for Nautical Charting Hydrographic Surveys - Public Review Draft

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 15 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

Ongoing Research at the USACE Field Research Facility Jeff Waters, PhD Chief, Coastal Observations & Analysis Branch Coastal & Hydraulics Lab

Coastal Wave Studies FY13 Summary Report

from ocean to cloud PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM

RAMSTM. 360 Riser and Anchor-Chain Integrity Monitoring for FPSOs

Robin J. Beaman. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.

NOAA s Underwater UXO Demonstration Projects Vieques Island, Puerto Rico

Surf Zone Mapping and Sensor System

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

Creation of bathymetric maps using satellite imagery

An Evaluation of Bathymetric LiDAR Systems

SeaSmart. Jonathan Evans

San Diego Coastal Ocean Observing System

East Isa Airborne Electromagnetic Survey, QLD, 2016 Contractor supplied data and conductivity models

Vieques Underwater Demonstration Project

NSF's Ocean Observatories Initiative: Building Research Infrastructure for the Pacific Northwest and the Broader Community

Marine Mammal Acoustic Tracking from Adapting HARP Technologies

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

Optimizing Sound Speed Profiling to Meet TPU Requirements using a CAST Gauge

THE POLARIMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF BOTTOM TOPOGRAPHY RELATED FEATURES ON SAR IMAGES

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

Coastal Sediment Transport Modeling Ocean Beach & San Francisco Bight, CA

Meeting the Challenges of the IHO and LINZ Special Order Object Detection Requirements

HOW TO BEST USE YOUR ELECTRONICS: CHARTING, SONAR, AND IMAGING. By: Captain Tom Blackburn

Body Search and Recovery Using Sonar

Wave-Phase-Resolved Air-Sea Interaction

Design and Planning Considerations For a Seabed Survey

Reply of Guyana Annex R2

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Specifications for Synchronized Sensor Pipe Condition Assessment (AS PROVIDED BY REDZONE ROBOTICS)

REMOTE SENSING APPLICATION in WIND ENERGY

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

The optimal position of a sidescan sonar towfish fixed to a shellfish vessel for very shallow surveys an experiment in the Dutch Wadden Sea

Homework 2a Bathymetric Charts [based on the Chauffe & Jefferies (2007)]

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

Copicut Reservoir Sidescan Sonar. Fall River, MA May 7, 2013

GNSS Technology for the Determination of Real-Time Tidal Information

SARASOTA BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM OYSTER HABITAT MONITORING RESULTS: YEAR 1. Jay R. Leverone

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title:

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

Monitoring tidal movements in Cook Inlet, Alaska, using the integration of remote sensing data, GIS, and inundation models

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/ Mulberry Phosphate Trustee Council September 12, 2013

Nortek Technical Note No.: TN-021. Chesapeake Bay AWAC Evaluation

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

Hydrographic Surveying:

DUKC Chart Overlay. Presentation to IHO TWL and DQ Working Groups Wollongong, March 2014

ScanFish Katria. Intelligent wide-sweep ROTV for magnetometer surveys

INSIDE 16. Hydrographic Soundings, Sensors, and Bots. Dual-head Sonar Mapping. 25 A Case for Big Blue Data. Collaboration in the Air & on the Ground

Shallow Surveying in Hazardous Waters

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

Eastern Equatorial Pacific

Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis. Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. Final Version

page - Laboratory Exercise #5 Shoreline Processes

Transcription:

Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014

Why topobathy LiDAR? Complements acoustic (multi-beam sonar) technology Airborne topobathy LiDAR is of high value in filling the 0 to 10 m depth gap in coastal and riverine areas Rapid survey of shallow water areas that are difficult, dangerous, or impossible to get using water borne methods Ability to rapidly assess riverine and estuary environments: channel cross sections, biological habitat, riparian conditions

Sandy River Results 3 Powerpoint title goes here December 20, 2011 Digital Surface Model Seamless topo-bathy model

Why do we need water surface returns? surface specular reflection bottom reflection Bathymetric data need to be corrected for the refraction of the incident laser pulse at the air-water interface, the change in the speed of light as it enters the water column, the attenuation of the laser signal in water, and the effect of water-column turbidity on the laser backscatter. water surface bathymetry sea bed

Topobathy LiDAR when is a good time to conduct a survey? Weather, snow-free, leaf-off, etc. Good water column clarity What about state of the sea surface? Large ocean waves are great for surfing, not for LiDAR! White Water

Topobathymetry when is a good time to conduct a survey? No wind and no surface waves Mirror like conditions Results in only specular reflection ( that the sensor sees at or near nadir)

Topobathymetry when is a good time to conduct a survey? Light wind conditions generate small waves (capillary waves) These small waves enable backscatter (reflection) at various angles along the LiDAR scan.

Questions: In very shallow areas, does the green LiDAR reflect off the water surface or the seabed? Can we obtain reliable water surface returns using Green and NIR sensor operating simultaneously (on the same platform)? Does mounting of the 2 systems at different lookangles improve the ability to determine surface returns?

2-laser source sensor configuration Riegl VQ-820G (Green) Leica ALS50 (NIR) Images courtesy Quantum Spatial Riegl VQ-820G has a 20 degree forward look angle Leica ALS50 is mounted at nadir At 600 m operating altitude, the same spot is illuminated by both sensors up to 3.2 seconds apart.

Project Area Supplemental Sandy Topobathy LiDAR and Imagery Task for the NOAA NGS Shoreline Mapping Program Dewberry tasked as prime contractor under the NOAA CGSC II contract Subcontractors Quantum Spatial (LiDAR and Imagery), RC&A (Imagery Acquisition), Woolpert (Imagery Processing) Project is currently underway (acquisition began Nov 21, 2013). 3 aircrafts with topobathy LiDAR being deployed and 2 aircrafts with DMC (imagery) Current acquisition status: ~95% complete Reflights currently underway in all 3 blocks for bathymetry during better water clarity conditions.

Acquisition Tracking Portal Tracking Supplemental Sandy LiDAR acquisition for NOAA and USGS.

Determining days of suitable water clarity

Acquisition using 2 laser sources LiDAR Survey Settings & Specifications Sensor Riegl VQ820G Leica ALS50 Laser Wave Length 532nm 1064 nm Laser Pulse Diameter 60cm 15 cm Scan Pattern Elliptical Sinusoidal Field of View 40, 20 forward fixed angle Maximum Returns unlimited 4 40⁰ Intensity 16-bit 8-bit Full Waveform Yes No Survey Altitude (AGL) 600 m 600 m Target Pulse Rate 130 khz 135 khz GPS Baselines 13 nm 13 nm GPS PDOP 3.0 3.0 GPS Satellite Constellation 6 6 Resolution/Density 6-8 pulses/m 2 6-8 pulses/m 2

Topobathy data preliminary images Green Intensity Waveform Bottom inflection Surface inflection Water column Rich Inlet, North Carolina

Topobathy data sample profiles Reliable water surface returns from green-only Riegl VQ- 820G 3-4 meter water depths in North Carolina Significant backscatter returns from the water column North Carolina

Sample profiles (NC) 7 meters at deepest extent 6 meters at deepest extent 11 meters at deepest extent, bathy extending nearly 800 meters offshore

Sample Area Assateague Island 7 cm resolution RGB Imagery Back Bay Tidally influenced wetlands White water Upland Veg. Beach Ocean waves

Sample Area Assateague Island NIR LiDAR Intensity Back Bay Tidally influenced wetlands White water Upland Veg. Beach Ocean waves

Sample Area Assateague Island Green LIDAR Intensity Back Bay Tidally influenced wetlands White water Upland Veg. Beach Ocean waves

Sample Area Assateague Island Bare Earth Digital Elevation Model NIR

Sample Area Assateague Island Seamless topobathy Digital Elevation Model Green bathymetry bathymetry NOT bathymetry

Are we seeing water surface returns in green LiDAR? Green Intensity NIR Intensity Profile Green ALL Returns 30 cm Profile NIR (white) + Green Returns

Water surface returns only in NIR data Green Intensity NIR Intensity Profile NIR + Green ALL Returns

24 Dewberry s Custom Refraction Correction Tool Allows the use of any water surface DEM to perform the refraction Creation of clean water surface DEM can be done in any COTS software. Python Executable Input: SBET (Trajectory), Water surface DEM, Green LAS data Output: Refracted Green LAS

Breaklines need to be collected to define the water surface mask using a combination of Ecognition and manual methods

Results Topobathy DEM after refraction correction

Results Profile View Green Intensity NIR Intensity Profile NIR (white) + Pink (unrefracted) + Green (refracted)

Results How much does the depth change after refraction correction? Water Depths (m)

Results How much does the depth change after refraction correction? 15-20, 1.20% 20-70, 1.24% 10-15, 5.30% 0-1, 12.40% 5-10, 20% 1-2, 7.70% 72% of the depths changed between 1-5 cm 20% of the depths changed between 5-10 cm 5.3% changed between 10-15 cm 4-5, 15.70% 3-4, 18.50% 2-3, 17.90%

Identifying submerged features in topobathy LiDAR NIR Green NIR Elevation (Seamless) Intensity (DSM) topobathy DEM

Temporal discrepancies in neashore bathymetry data Pilot area located near Rich Inlet, NC

Temporal discrepancies in neashore bathymetry data acquired within 7 days Point 3 90 cm Point 5 50 cm 30 cm Point 6

Decision tree to resolve temporal issues in data

Pilot Area

Pilot Area

Pilot Area

Pilot Area ocean side bathymetry

LAS Classes used for this project Class Class 0 Class 1 Class 2 Class 7 Class 14 Class 15 Class 16 Class 18 Class 19 Class 20 Class 21 Class 22 Class 23 Class 24 Class 25 Class 26 Class 27 Class 28 LiDAR Classification Production/Editing Description Never Classified Unclassified Ground (Topo) Topo Noise (low or high) Points unrefracted because water surface raster does not cover these points Unrefracted points due to out of range values compared to sbets Refracted Points above NIR Points Refracted High Water (HW) points landward of the MLLW land/water interface breakline Refracted Points Bathy Points that remain Unrefracted Sensor noise water surface Bathy Noise (Unrefracted green points higher than the NIR water surface) Sensor Noise (all sensor noise-as classified by the sensor software RiProcess-over land, only unrefracted sensor noise points over water) Sensor noise Refracted Water Column (No Bottom Found) Bathy Bottom (Submerged Topography) Water Surface Temporally-changed bottom

Summary In very shallow areas, green LiDAR can have no surface returns and reflect only off the seabed (when water column is relatively clear) Water surface returns from NIR sensor are more reliable in shallow depths and can be used to correct for refraction. Dewberry s refraction tool enables use of multiple sources of LiDAR data. Using green-only sensor, if refraction correction is not performed, vertical errors of 5-15 cm are possible in shallow water depths.

Thank you. Questions? Amar Nayegandhi Director of Remote Sensing Dewberry anayegandhi@dewberry.com Ph: 813 421 8642 (office) Cell: 727 967 5005