TEXAS LAND MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 2007

Similar documents
OPPORTUNITY ZONE TRACT LISTING

Perforated Appendix Admission Risk-Adjusted-Rate, 2013

Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit

Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit

Texas. Demographic Characteristics and Trends. Senate Select Committee on Redistricting. September 1, 2010 Austin, TX

TxAlerts (Flyer Program)

2014 Annual Report Epidemiology and Supplemental Projects Group Prepared July 22, 2015

March 27, All Nursing Facility Administrators

Dr. James P. Gaines Chief Economist. recenter.tamu.edu

Dr. James P. Gaines Chief Economist. recenter.tamu.edu

Texas County & District Retirement System Pension Trust Fund Schedule of Changes in Financial Net Position by Employer

2002 PLAGUE SURVEILLANCE REPORT (REVISED )

Intensive management of native ungulates: Conservation success inside a Pandora s box. Randy W. DeYoung

SAFE-D Members *updated 1/18/2019

SAFE-D Members *updated 11/1/2017

Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/19/14 Page 1 of 5 OF PUBLIC SAFETY AUSTIN. wwwdpstexasgov. the Department of Public

AGENDA. TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 125 East 11 th Street Austin, Texas THURSDAY June 30, 2005 * * *

OFFICIAL MINUTES. MINUTES OF THE DIRECTORS BOARD OF THE TEXAS MASTER GARDENERS ASSOCIATION FEBRUARY 3/2018 Texas A&M University College Station, Texas

Texas Rural Transportaion Plan - Preliminary Project Rankings by District

THSADA NEWSLETTER. Letter From the Executive Director Rusty Dowling, Executive Director, THSADA

Texas Rural Transportaion Plan - Preliminary Project Rankings by District

Commission Approved Stimulus Maintenance Projects

texas department of transportation Commission Approved Stimulus Maintenance Projects

North Texas Real Estate Information System MLS Current Month Summary for: July 2010

Dangerous by Design 2014 Texas

EXHIBIT A. Revised List of Projects Originally Approved by the Commission in Minute Order Dated November 19, 2009.

Houston. Arturo Garcilazo. Darell Hoffer. Chase Karl PEOPLE'S CHOICE BEST OF SHOW OPEN RANGE

I-69 Program Segment Committee

AGENDA TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. 125 East 11 th Street Austin, Texas THURSDAY April 30, 2009

TBGA Unofficial Entries as of March 20, 2018 Youth Division

OPEN GIRLS Winners are (left to right) Champion Meagan Harrington from Nueces County 4-H, Runner-Up Rachel Barringer from Victoria County 4-H, Third P

Copyrighted STANDARD PRINTING & LITHOGRAPHING Co Capitol Ave. Houston, Texas

Partnerships with Purpose: Housing for Texans

Presentation Objectives

texas department of transportation Commission Approved Stimulus Projects

APPROVED PROJECTS RESCHEDULED FROM AUGUST TO SEPTEMBER :19 Thursday, June 13,

Population Change during Trying Times: Illinois New Demographic Reality

TB/HIV/STD Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. Texas STD Surveillance Report

2017 Jr. Market Lamb Results

Duval Classic Prospect Show 11 th Annual Duval Classic Prospect Show Nov 10, 2012-Steers and Heifers Nov 11, 2012-Lambs and Goats Benavides Ag Farm

STATEWIDE OBSERVATIONAL SURVEY OF SAFElY BELT AND MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE IN TEXAS Prepared By KN. Womack VJ. Pezoldt

ESTIMATED PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE OF LUNG DISEASE BY LUNG ASSOCIATION TERRITORY

DISTRICT AUSTIN 3226 BASTROP US NH 2011(720) $ 578, NO AWARD

Demographic Characteristics and Trends of Bexar County and San Antonio, TX

Last Name First Name County District Scholarship San Antonio Stock Show & Rodeo Arthur Jadeyn Crosby 2 San Antonio Livestock Exposition Dallmeyer

Lubbock Rape Crisis Center

ZONE V SEPTEMBER 7-9, 2018

2018 Jr. Market Lamb Results

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Main Event - Modified Trap

Jr. Market Lambs. Rodeo Austin

TVMDL PT Authorized Testing Agent List

1 Tracy Gilliam Brewster N Mule Deer NonTypical 201 1/ /8 1 Mike Dunnahoo Brewster N Mule Deer NonTypical 160 5/ /8 El Cielo

Cotton Ginnings Crop Summary. !ti1) Depaimertc. United States. ' Agicutze. National Agricultural Statistics Service. May 1992 Ct Gn 1(92)

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

Junior Wether Doe Results

Award List-By County. County Variety Award First Name Last Name. Andrews. San Saba Improved 1st Place Stokes Family. Stuart 1st Place Ron Richardson

July 2007 NO UPDATE FOR TEX-207-F, EFFECTIVE MAY 2007

FIRST HARVEST First Last County Animal Category Ranch Macayla Abbott Hemphill White-Tailed Deer First Big Game Harvest Tubb Ranch Terry Akers

Agriculture and the Economy: A View from the Chicago Fed

13,351. Overall Statewide Results. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle? What is your primary means of transportation?

Junior Breeding Goat Results

HUD's 2012 Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs Housing Inventory Count Report

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH HUNTING ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST. Joni S. Charles, PhD. Contracted through the. River Systems Institute

Pasture Cash Rental Rates

A Distant Mirror: Credit contraction, monetary policy and commodity prices during the Great Depression. John Kemp Reuters 30 January 2009

Texas AgriLife Extension Service

YOUTH DIVISION

NEW PERMITS ISSUED IN UPDATED THROUGH DECEMBER 1, 2013

RODEO AUSTIN HOLDS JUNIOR MARKET GOAT SHOW. Austin, Texas, March 16, 2016 Rodeo Austin held their Junior Market Goat Show where

U.S., Texas and North Texas Economic Trends and Forecast. Where are we? Where are we going? And what can we do about it?

THE BLUE SKY REPORT A KERRIGAN QUARTERLY. Third Quarter 2018 December 2018

Economic Outlook for Canada: Economy Confronting Capacity Limits

ANNUAL BUSINESS FORMATION REPORT January 11, 2013

Atascosa County Deer Hunting Market Research

Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Brooks County Deer Hunting Market Research

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

Cotton Ginnings Summary. May 1993 Ct Gn 1(93) United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service

Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Equine Equine Income Acres

Trap Shooters Extravaganza Results

Macro and Agricultural Economic Outlook FCL 2017 Annual Meeting. Tanner Ehmke, Manager Knowledge Exchange Division

Borderplex Business Barometer, Volume 2, Number 10

Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Official Scored Entry Standings

Iowa Farmland Market Update: What s Ahead?

Agricultural Outlook: Rebalancing U.S. Agriculture

Dr. James P. Gaines Research Economist. recenter.tamu.edu

Kenedy County Deer Hunting Market Research

Georgia Department of Education

Junior Market Lamb Show Placings

Iowa Land Values. Wendong Zhang Assistant Professor of Economics and Extension Economist

Texas Economic Outlook: Recovery in 2010 Keith Phillips Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas San Antonio Office

Will 2016 Be the Last Hurrah for Commercial Real Estate? Presented By: John Chang First Vice-President Marcus & Millichap Research Services

2018 Jr. Market Steer Results

A Primer on Factors Affecting Farmland Values

Nueces County Guided Fishing Market Research

Welcome to The University of Texas Golf Club

Texas Revolution Notes & Exit Ticket(s) Complete the Texas Revolution Research Notes You will need notebook paper for your formative assessment

Transcription:

TEXAS LAND MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 2007 Charles E. Gilliland Research Economist Nirad Pachchigar Research Assistant Siddhartha Singh Research Assistant TECHNICAL REPORT 1 8 6 1 JUNE 2008 TR

Texas Land Market Developments 2007 Charles E. Gilliland Research Economist Nirad Pachchigar Research Assistant Siddhartha Singh Research Assistant Texas A&M University June 2008 2008, Real Estate Center. All rights reserved.

Texas Land Market Developments 2007 Executive Summary Size of properties fell to 80 acres in 2007, a new low. Prices rose 20 percent from $1,825 per acre in 2006 to $2,190 per acre in 2007, continuing the rapid price appreciation since 2003. Prices rose strongly throughout the state. Volume of sales slowed slightly in 2007, falling to 7,588 sales compared with a 2006 volume of 8,215 sales, an 8 percent drop. Numbers of large acreage sales (5,000 acres or more) declined 36 percent in 2007. Buoyed by high commodity prices and generous yields, the 2007 market saw growing interest in cropland land by investors and farmers. Some investors appear to perceive inflation in the future. Some observers saw a noticeable increase in the number of buyers who immediately offer the property for resale at a higher price. The market continues to see a dearth of quality properties for sale, contributing to the slow-down in sales volume. Although more leverage has appeared in 2007, much of the market still involves substantial percentages of cash. Texas land prices have spiraled to ever-higher levels in the past five years. Early in 2007, observers reported slowing sales and emerging resistance to higher asking prices. While continuing to note a lack of good-quality land for sale, market participants began to wonder if the long awaited cooling in price appreciation had begun. But rising levels of uncertainty in financial markets, coupled with soaring commodity prices and a lack of alternative investments drove market acceleration once more as the year drew to a close. At 20 percent, the growth in sale price slightly moderated from the stratospheric 23 percent posted in 2006 (Figure 1). At $2,190 per acre, the 2007 statewide price topped $2,000 per acre for the first time. The 2006 price was $1,825 per acre. Despite the slight dip in price growth in 2006, the 2007 increase eclipses the 16 percent growth in both the 2003 and 2004 markets. In 2007, Texas land prices were 224 percent of 2002 prices. That change amounts to a compound growth rate of more than 17 percent annually. Dollars per Acre 2,200 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 1966 1968 1970 1972 The real or inflation adjusted price of $424 per acre in 1966 dollars pushed past the $400 mark for the first time. Nominal prices shown in Figure 1 reflect the actual prices paid while real prices represent those nominal prices adjusted for inflation. The real price change indicates that prices, in terms of purchasing power, rose 17 percent above inflation in 2007 compared to 2006 prices. Tract Size The 2007 market recorded a pronounced shift away from larger properties. Size of tract per transaction dropped precipituously from 98 acres in 2006 to 80 acres. Markets have hovered in the 100-acre range for the past five years. Figure 2 reveals that tract size has dropped well below 100 acres and substantially under the 140-acre levels posted in 1997 98. The 80-acre size sets a new low for Texas land markets. Since the 1960s, prices of small, typical and large properties have generally followed similar trends (see Figure 3). Small properties are the smallest quarter of sales while the large properties are the largest one-fourth of sales. Typical tracts are the half of sales in the middle. Since 2003, small property prices have increased more rapidly than prices for the typical and large properties. In 2007, small property prices registered a $4,000 per acre median compared to $1,800 per acre for the large properties. Typical property prices recorded a median of $2,132 per acre. Small property prices rose 15 percent in 2007 while typical property prices increased 13 percent. However, following a dramatic rise in 2006, large property prices barely changed in Figure 1. Texas Rural Land Prices, 2007 Nominal 1974 1976 Real or Deflated 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 1

Acres 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 1966 1968 1970 2007, rising only 4 percent over 2006 levels. These developments suggest that demand for large properties cooled in 2007. Sales Volume Figure 2. Texas Typical Tract Size 1972 1974 Land Prices Per Acre 500 0 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1976 1978 Large Small Typical 1978 The year began with an apparent slowing in volume of sales, but later buying activity reversed that trend. At 7,588, the 2007 volume of sales came in at 8 percent less than the 8,215 sales in 2006 (Figure 4). This virtually unchanged level of activity kept the 2007 market apace with the high level of activity recorded between 2003 and 2007. However, reflecting the cooling of large property sales prices, the volume shifted away from the large end of the market. While small properties sales volume remained steady (Figure 5), large sales volume fell substantially (Figure 6) from 96 in 2006 to 61 in 2007. 1980 1980 1982 1982 1984 1984 1986 1986 1988 1988 1990 1990 1992 1992 1994 1994 1996 1996 Future Trends With soaring commodity prices and an unparalleled five-year increase in prices, land markets are increasingly difficult to predict. Many conventional assumptions about price behavior no longer seem to apply. In the current situation, observers see an array of nearterm prospects. First, land prices probably cannot indefinitely sustain the rate of increase seen for the past five years. However, current trends continue to reflect an upward price spiral. Second, a substantial drop in prices would most likely follow a severe economic dislocation such as a prolonged, deep recession. Ongoing financial market problems now make that a possibility. It seems increasingly likely that some kind of direct governmental intervention in financial markets will take place. That kind of solution may help to avoid or at least limit the financial damage that the economy faces without it. Third, without a severe economic blow, land prices will likely continue to rise but at a more sustainable rate. The question then is how likely are each of those scenarios? What is the probability that buyers will continue to flock into land markets with cash to drive prices ever higher? Currently, the economy remains awash in investment money seeking a safe haven. Much of it seems to have settled on land as a viable option, and in the closing months of 2007, cropland in particular was targeted. Soaring commodity prices led investors to anticipate strong earnings from farming well into the future. These investors, competing with farmers flush with cash from good crops are driving up cropland prices. Some new investors have begun to focus on ranch properties. And the falling U.S. dollar makes land prices extremely cheap for many foreign investors. What is the probability of an economy-wide recession or dislocation severe enough to induce a substantial downward repricing of land? Purchasing power has eroded with fuel and food prices increasing dramatically during 2007. The subprime crisis continues to snarl financial markets with no resolution in sight. Observers increasingly fret that a substantial economic adjustment lies just ahead. A pronounced economic downturn would undoubtedly prompt an exodus of potential buyers from the market. There is no question that this scenario is possible. However, powerful political and economic forces are grappling with the problems and may be able to stave off the worst-case scenario. 1998 1998 2000 2000 2002 2002 2004 2004 2006 2006 2

Number of Sales 8,500 7,500 6,500 5,500 4,500 3,500 2,500 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 Number of sales 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 Figure 4. Texas Land Market Volume 1976 1976 1978 What is the probability that markets will moderate to a sustainable level of increase? The past five years have seen conditions that produced an almost frenzied desire for land. Rising incomes, inflationary fears, relatively low land prices and a host of other factors combined to boost prices to unprecedented highs. With investment markets still in turmoil and uncertainty about future economic events, land prices will likely continue to climb. When the investing environment settles into a more predictable pattern, the rate of increase seen in recent years will slow. As Texas land prices, which are low compared with those in many states, begin to rise, the lure of Texas markets will wane. But do not look for this to happen in the near term. Based on early 2008 data, continued growth at a lower level seems the most likely short-term prospect. Over the longer 1978 1980 1980 1982 1982 1984 1984 1986 1986 1988 1988 1990 1990 1992 1992 1994 1994 1996 term, prices will probably moderate to growth rates more typically seen over the past 40 years. Regional Land Market Developments Market developments in 2007 reflected an emerging disposition among buyers to resist newly escalated asking prices in many areas, especially for larger properties. Still, the supply of land for sale remains tight while demand remains healthy. Some markets in south Texas appear poised to take a breather from the rapid price escalation in recent years as some sellers have reduced asking prices. Although more leverage is evident in many areas, cash is still plentiful and looking for investments in the tight markets. In addition, spurred on by high commodity prices, investors have discovered agricultural cropland. Purchases of farmland accelerated in the latter part of the year. These factors point to a further rise in already historically high prices in the near term. The following land market areas (LMAs) registered especially strong (statistically significant) trends compared with markets levels in 2006. All regions experienced price increases in 2007. Local developments reflected a voracious appetite for land encountering a limited supply of listings. The following analysis notes some of the forces driving those trends. Detailed statistics documenting regional developments are shown in Table 2. LMAs 19, 20 and 21 Price increases here ranked among the highest in the state in 2007. Buyers discovered the relatively low prices prevailing in these coastal bend regions and drove markets up strongly in 2007. Percentage increases ranged from 34 to 46 percent. Although there is still a lot of cash in the market, borrowing is becoming more prevalent. Lenders report an increased demand for loans from an emerging pool of borrowers with substantial amounts of existing debt. LMAs 28, 29, 30 and 31 East Texas markets have not seen immediate flipping of deals, but some buyers from 2004 and 2005 are now reselling at 25 to 35 percent profits. This market is largely cash-driven. LMAs 29 and 31 both saw sales volume increase substantially in 2007. LMAs 12 and 23 These north Texas areas registered regionwide increases as the Wichita Falls and Fort Worth areas posted 1996 1998 1998 2000 2000 2002 2002 2004 2004 2006 2006 3

Number of sales 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 1966 strongly higher prices, up 32 and 23 percent. Barnett shale activity continues to fuel land-buying activity in these areas. LMAs 25 and 27 The Brazos River region posted increases of 12 and 23 percent in 2007. The market is awash in cash with few large properties for sale. LMAs 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 These west Texas regions saw median prices expand from 17 to 39 percent above comparable 2006 levels. Brokers report a struggle to find good properties to sell. The volume of calls has increased and asking prices are about 30 percent higher than recent sale prices. Sales of cropland accelerated in the fourth quarter with investors invading this market, driving prices to unprecedented levels in some areas. LMAs 10 and 11 The volume of transactions is noticeably down in some parts of this region according to observers. Leverage is up. Asking prices, higher than last year, are no longer firm and price resistance is evident, especially for larger properties. However, 2007 prices still rose 17 to 18 percent above 2006 levels. LMAs 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 26 Prices in the Hill Country, the Highland Lakes, and Austin surged substantially with percentage increases ranging from 19 to 33 percent. Observers report an increase in investment-motivated purchases with an attendant increase in the numbers of properties bought and immediately reoffered for sale. Prices are strong, but more bargaining is going on. Proper Use of the Data The tables included in this analysis contain statistics based on regional medians of prices paid for rural lands in Texas. Approximately 8,000 reported transactions form the foundation for this analysis of general trends in Texas land markets. The median is the middle price in a ranked list of prices. Each individual Land Market Area listing in the tables relates to the median sale prices for the indicated region. Because medians are not unduly influenced by extremely high or low prices (outliers), these medians provide a stable indicator of typical properties over time using relatively small samples of sold properties. The statewide trend analysis reflects changes in weighted average of regional median land prices. The weighting process reflects the percentage of Texas rural land found in each land market area as well as each regional median price. Readers should use the statistics from the tables as an indicator of past general trends in prices in Texas land markets. The data are highly aggregated and do not represent land prices or values of any particular farm, ranch or tract. However, the statistics do provide a general guide to land market developments. Readers should not regard the reported statistics as a substitute for an appraisal or market study of current local sales regarding the value of any particular farm or ranch. 08-1861 4

5

Table 1. Nominal and Real Changes in Weighted Average Price of Texas Rural Land, 1966 2007 Nominal Annual Deflated Annual Median Weighted Compound Weighted Compound Tract Average Year-to-Year Pretax Average Year-to-Year Pretax Size Price per Percentage Growth Rate Price per Percentage Growth Rate Year (acres) Acre Change from 1966 Acre* Change from 1966 1966 120 $157 **** **** $157 **** **** 1967 110 169 8 8 164 4 4.5 1968 101 181 7 7 168 2 3.4 1969 100 190 5 7 168 0 2.3 1970 107 204 7 7 172 2 2.3 1971 110 213 4 6 171 1 1.7 1972 120 233 9 7 179 5 2.2 1973 153 304 30 10 221 23 5.0 1974 150 372 22 11 248 12 5.9 1975 126 384 3 10 234 6 4.5 1976 128 412 7 10 238 2 4.2 1977 121 436 6 10 236 1 3.8 1978 126 485 11 10 246 4 3.8 1979 132 544 12 10 254 3 3.8 1980 138 613 13 10 263 4 3.8 1981 124 708 15 11 278 6 3.9 1982 105 773 9 10 286 3 3.8 1983 113 796 3 10 283 1 3.5 1984 125 842 6 10 288 2 3.4 1985 118 865 3 9 288 0 3.2 1986 113 714 17 8 232 19 2.0 1987 130 611 14 7 193 17 1.0 1988 139 574 6 6 176 9 0.5 1989 141 562 2 6 166 6 0.2 1990 135 539 4 5 153 8 0.1 1991 138 508 6 5 139 9 0.5 1992 145 499 2 5 134 4 0.6 1993 140 503 1 4 132 1 0.6 1994 136 544 8 5 140 6 0.4 1995 122 586 8 5 147 5 0.2 1996 111 638 9 5 158 7 0.0 1997 139 657 3 5 160 1 0.1 1998 139 723 10 5 174 9 0.3 1999 120 786 9 5 186 7 0.5 2000 117 842 7 5 195 5 0.6 2001 101 945 12 5 214 10 0.9 2002 107 974 3 5 217 1 0.9 2003 100 1,097 13 5 239 10 1.1 2004 102 1,274 16 6 270 13 1.4 2005 100 1,483 16 6 304 13 1.7 2006 99 1,825 23 6 363 19 2.1 2007 80 2,190 20 7 424 17 2.5 *In 1966 dollars 6 Real

Table 2. Trends in Texas Rural Land Markets Through 4th Quarter 2006 07 Land Market Area Volume of Sales Typical Size of Transaction Typical Prices Acres per Sale Change Extremes Dollar per Acre Change Extremes LMA Description 2006 2007 Percentage 2006 2007 Percentage TEST Minimum Maximum 2006 2007 Percentage TEST Minimum Maximum 1 Panhandle North 84 89 6 480 640 33 ** 17 5,276 651 727 12 260 5,000 2 Panhandle Central 201 197 2 327 320 2 ** 10 4,160 550 700 27 ** 211 19,319 3 South Plains 233 157 33 200 170 15 10 6,444 600 700 17 * 119 15,600 4 Permian West 302 280 7 245 238 3 10 31,076 571 747 31 ** 108 15,727 5 Canadian Breaks 36 38 6 639 615 4 69 5,873 471 481 2 148 4,500 6 Rolling Plains North 179 163 9 320 320 0 * 20 37,256 625 750 20 ** 199 5,400 7 Rolling Plains Central 263 261 1 190 160 16 * 10 2,370 675 935 39 ** 111 17,449 8 Trans-Pecos 52 21 60 194 2,273 1,070 ** 41 32,882 295 315 7 188 873 9 Edwards Plateau West 408 304 25 192 162 16 10 27,758 950 1,217 28 ** 78 8,582 10 Edwards Plateau South 200 168 16 102 134 31 10 13,399 2,314 2,705 17 ** 637 20,000 11 Rio Grande Plains 127 164 29 371 420 13 11 6,101 1,460 1,724 18 ** 445 6,700 12 North Central Plains 548 495 10 134 159 19 10 5,781 1,135 1,500 32 ** 178 18,519 13 Crosstimbers 597 422 29 121 113 7 * 10 1,254 1,916 2,295 20 ** 308 21,739 14 Hill Country North 311 305 2 135 100 26 ** 10 4,369 2,250 3,000 33 ** 257 13,430 15 Hill Country West 148 139 6 206 109 47 ** 10 6,249 1,994 2,600 30 ** 831 22,000 16 Highland Lakes 317 311 2 60 52 14 10 6,651 4,600 5,750 25 ** 2,224 28,928 17 Hill Country South 175 155 11 36 45 27 * 10 4,929 7,086 8,431 19 ** 1,055 29,707 18 San Antonio 331 325 2 47 44 6 10 2,414 3,799 4,000 5 467 29,364 19 Coastal Prairie North 347 388 12 50 45 10 * 10 671 3,500 4,676 34 ** 1,103 20,496 20 Coastal Prairie South 152 116 24 125 91 27 ** 10 5,320 1,773 2,401 35 ** 950 14,572 21 Coastal Prairie Middle 158 146 8 110 88 20 12 4,964 1,800 2,624 46 ** 471 14,658 22 Texoma 343 364 6 49 50 3 10 1,949 3,200 3,163 1 664 25,670 23 Fort Worth Prairie 363 322 11 32 27 17 ** 10 4,446 5,274 6,500 23 ** 1,792 25,000 24 Dallas Prairie 243 170 30 40 41 3 10 964 4,400 4,967 13 850 29,808 25 Blacklands North 530 514 3 87 55 37 ** 10 3,208 2,389 2,665 12 ** 599 27,978 26 Blacklands South 500 402 20 50 39 23 ** 10 1,506 4,000 4,998 25 ** 984 29,153 27 Brazos 276 276 0 48 39 19 * 10 1,723 4,078 5,012 23 ** 975 24,840 28 Houston 471 500 6 32 31 4 10 7,834 6,000 7,500 25 ** 680 30,000 29 North East 124 183 48 72 60 18 ** 10 2,950 1,374 1,557 13 ** 482 12,800 30 Piney Woods North 95 59 38 105 81 23 10 2,714 2,156 2,500 16 ** 1,058 11,786 31 Piney Woods South 41 64 56 76 55 28 11 2,366 2,000 2,400 20 ** 769 25,833 32 Lower Rio Grande Valley 59 89 51 25 34 36 10 4,140 5,715 4,700 18 1,000 25,000 33 El Paso 1 1 0 145 12 92 * 12 12 10,791 10,852 1 10,852 10,852 Texas 8,215 7,588 8 98 80 18 ** 10 37,256 1,825 2,190 20 ** 78 30,000 Note 1: Test shows the result of a Mann-Whitney test of the indicated changes; (**) indicates significance at 99% level; (*) indicates significance at the 95% level; all others showed no statistically verifiable trend Note 2: Test data in the volume, size and price columns are rounded. Percentage calculations are based on unrounded numbers. 7

Texas Land Market Areas DALLAM HARTLEY SHERMAN HANSFORD OCHILTREE LIPSCOMB 1 5 MOORE HUTCHINSON ROBERTS HEMPHILL OLDHAM POTTER CARSON GRAY WHEELER 33 EL PASO HUDSPETH CULBERSON JEFF DAVIS PRESIDIO REEVES LOVING WINKLER WARD BAILEY 4 ANDREWS 2 3 ARMSTRONG BORDEN SAN SABA CROCKETT MENARD SCHLEICHER PECOS MASON 8 9 15 SUTTON 16 BREWSTER COCHRAN DEAF SMITH PARMER YOAKUM GAINES ECTOR CRANE CASTRO LAMB HOCKLEY TERRY RANDALL HALE LUBBOCK DAWSON MARTIN MIDLAND UPTON TERRELL SWISHER LYNN BRISCOE FLOYD CROSBY GARZA HOWARD GLASSCOCK REAGAN DONLEY MOTLEY DICKENS SCURRY IRION KENT MITCHELL STERLING VAL VERDE HALL 6 COKE COLLINGS- WORTH 7 CHILDRESS COTTLE KING STONEWALL FISHER NOLAN TOM GREEN EDWARDS KINNEY MAVERICK JONES TAYLOR RUNNELS HARDEMAN CONCHO FOARD HASKELL KIMBLE REAL KNOX UVALDE BANDERA 10 ZAVALA BAYLOR CALLAHAN COLEMAN KERR WILBARGER 12 THROCK- MORTON SHACKLE- FORD MCCULLOCH 17 MEDINA ARCHER EASTLAND 13 BROWN FRIO STEPHENS 14 GILLESPIE WICHITA YOUNG COMANCHE LLANO KENDALL BEXAR BLANCO 18 ATASCOSA CLAY JACK PALO PINTO MILLS ERATH BURNET COMAL HAMILTON LAMPASAS HAYS 23 HOOD CORYELL GUADALUPE KARNES MONTAGUE PARKER TRAVIS WILSON WISE SOMERVELL BOSQUE BELL 26 CALDWELL COOKE JOHNSON WILLIAMSON BASTROP GONZALES DE WITT GOLIAD DENTON TARRANT HILL MCLENNAN 25 19 22 DALLAS COLLIN 24 ELLIS FALLS MILAM LEE FAYETTE LAVACA VICTORIA GRAYSON LIMESTONE BURLESON TRINITY MADISON POLK 27 31 WALKER COLORADO JACKSON ROCK- WALL NAVARRO ROBERTSON FANNIN KAUFMAN FREESTONE BRAZOS WASHINGTON AUSTIN WHARTON HUNT LEON GRIMES WALLER 21 MATAGORDA RAINS VAN ZANDT DELTA HOPKINS HENDERSON ANDERSON HARRIS FORT BEND LAMAR FRANKLIN WOOD CHEROKEE HOUSTON MONTGOMERY 28 BRAZORIA RED RIVER SMITH SAN JACINTO 29 TITUS CAMP UPSHUR GREGG 30 LIBERTY GALVESTON MORRIS RUSK NACOGDOCHES ANGELINA BOWIE CASS HARDIN CHAMBERS MARION HARRISON PANOLA TYLER SHELBY SAN AUGUSTINE JASPER JEFFERSON SABINE ORANGE NEWTON DIMMIT WEBB LA SALLE 11 MCMULLEN DUVAL LIVE OAK JIM WELLS BEE KLEBERG 20 NUECES SAN PATRICIO REFUGIO ARANSAS CALHOUN ZAPATA JIM HOGG BROOKS KENEDY STARR HIDALGO 32 WILLACY CAMERON 1 Panhandle North 12 North Central Plains 23 Fort Worth Prairie 2 Panhandle Central 13 Crosstimbers 24 Dallas Prairie 3 South Plains 14 Hill Country North 25 Blacklands North 4 Permian West 15 Hill Country West 26 Blacklands South 5 Canadian Breaks 16 Highland Lakes 27 Brazos 6 Rolling Plains North 17 Hill Country South 28 Houston 7 Rolling Plains Central 18 San Antonio 29 Northeast 8 Trans-Pecos 19 Coastal Prairie North 30 Piney Woods North 9 Edwards Plateau West 20 Coastal Prairie South 31 Piney Woods South 10 Edwards Plateau South 21 Coastal Prairie Middle 32 Lower Rio Grande Valley 11 Rio Grande Plains 22 Texoma 33 El Paso 8

Texas Market Areas and Counties Land Market Area 1 Dallam Hansford Hartley Moore Ochiltree Sherman Land Market Area 2 Armstrong Briscoe Carson Castro Deaf Smith Gray Parmer Randall Swisher Land Market Area 3 Borden Crosby Dawson Floyd Garza Hale Lubbock Lynn Land Market Area 4 Andrews Bailey Cochran Ector Gaines Hockley Howard Lamb Martin Midland Terry Yoakum Land Market Area 5 Hemphill Hutchinson Lipscomb Oldham Potter Roberts Land Market Area 6 Childress Collingsworth Cottle Dickens Donley Hall Kent King Motley Stonewall Wheeler Land Market Area 7 Fisher Jones Mitchell Nolan Runnels Scurry Taylor Land Market Area 8 Brewster Crane Culberson Hudspeth Jeff Davis Loving Pecos Presidio Reeves Terrell Ward Winkler Land Market Area 9 Coke Concho Crockett Edwards Glasscock Irion Kinney Reagan Schleicher Sterling Sutton Tom Green Upton Val Verde Land Market Area 10 Frio Maverick Medina Uvalde Zavala Land Market Area 11 Brooks Dimmit Duval Jim Hogg Kenedy La Salle McMullen Starr Webb Zapata Land Market Area 12 Archer Baylor Clay Foard Hardeman Haskell Jack Knox Shackelford Stephens Throckmorton Wichita Wilbarger Young Land Market Area 13 Brown Callahan Coleman Comanche Eastland Erath Land Market Area 14 Hamilton McCulloch Mills Lampasas San Saba Land Market Area 15 Kimble Menard Real 9

Land Market Area 16 Burnet Gillespie Llano Mason Land Market Area 17 Bandera Blanco Kendall Kerr Land Market Area 18 Atascosa Bexar Comal Guadalupe Karnes Wilson Land Market Area 19 Colorado DeWitt Fayette Gonzales Lavaca Land Market Area 20 Aransas Bee Goliad Jim Wells Kleberg Live Oak Nueces Refugio San Patricio Land Market Area 21 Calhoun Jackson Matagorda Victoria Wharton Land Market Area 22 Cooke Fannin Grayson Montague Land Market Area 23 Hood Johnson Palo Pinto Parker Somervell Tarrant Wise Land Market Area 24 Collin Dallas Denton Ellis Hunt Kaufman Rains Rockwall Van Zandt Land Market Area 25 Bell Bosque Coryell Falls Freestone Hill Limestone McLennan Navarro Land Market Area 26 Bastrop Caldwell Hays Lee Milam Travis Williamson Land Market Area 27 Brazos Burleson Grimes Leon Madison Robertson Washington Land Market Area 28 Austin Brazoria Chambers Fort Bend Galveston Hardin Harris Jefferson Liberty Montgomery Orange San Jacinto Walker Waller Land Market Area 29 Bowie Camp Cass Delta Franklin Hopkins Lamar Marion Morris Red River Titus Upshur Wood Land Market Area 30 Anderson Cherokee Gregg Harrison Henderson Houston Nacogdoches Panola Rusk Shelby Smith Land Market Area 31 Angelina Jasper Newton Polk Sabine San Augustine Trinity Tyler Land Market Area 32 Cameron Hidalgo Willacy Land Market Area 33 El Paso 10

MAYS BUSINESS SCHOOL Texas A&M University 2115 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-2115 http://recenter.tamu.edu 979-845-2031 DIRECTOR GARY W. MALER ADVISORY COMMITTEE D. MARC McDOUGAL, CHAIRMAN Lubbock JAMES M. BOYD Houston CATARINA G. CRON Houston DAVID E. DALZELL Abilene TOM H. GANN Lufkin RONALD C. WAKEFIELD, VICE CHAIRMAN San Antonio JACQUELYN K. HAWKINS Austin BARBARA A. RUSSELL Denton DOUGLAS A. SCHWARTZ El Paso JOHN D. ECKSTRUM, EX-OFFICIO Conroe 11