( max)o Wind Waves 10 Short Swell (large wave steepness) 25 Long Swell (small wave steepness) 75

Similar documents
BRRAKING WAVE FORCES ON WALLS

Kelly Legault, Ph.D., P.E. USACE SAJ

Characterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements

Internal Waves and Mixing in the Aegean Sea

High-Frequency Scattering from the Sea Surface and Multiple Scattering from Bubbles

Air-Sea Interaction Spar Buoy Systems

Rogue Wave Statistics and Dynamics Using Large-Scale Direct Simulations

PREDICTION OF ERODED VERSUS ACCRETED BEACHES

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SPILLING BREAKERS

Waves, Turbulence and Boundary Layers

TITLE: Assessing the Hydrodynamic Performance of Fouling-Release Surfaces (ONR Research Contract # N WR )

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY FRAGMENTATION SEPARATION DISTANCES FOR CASED CYLINDRICAL MUNITIONS

Internal Waves in Straits Experiment Progress Report

Marine Mammal Acoustic Tracking from Adapting HARP Technologies

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Determination Of Nearshore Wave Conditions And Bathymetry From X-Band Radar Systems

Imaging the Lung Under Pressure

Navy Shipbuilding Industrial Base

Determination of Nearshore Wave Conditions and Bathymetry from X-Band Radar Systems

Using SolidWorks & CFD to Create The Next Generation Airlocks

Remote Monitoring of Dolphins and Whales in the High Naval Activity Areas in Hawaiian Waters

DoD Coral Reef Protection and Management Program

Long-Term Autonomous Measurement of Ocean Dissipation with EPS-MAPPER

AFRL-RX-WP-TP

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

Temporary Flying Restrictions Due to Exogenous Factors

Global Ocean Internal Wave Database

NONLINEAR INTERNAL WAVES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA

z Interim Report for May 2004 to October 2005 Aircrew Performance and Protection Branch Wright-Patterson AFB, OH AFRL-HE-WP-TP

Development of Low Volume Shape Memory Alloy Variable Ballast System for AUV Use

Three Dimensional Shallow Water Adaptive Hydraulics (ADH-SW3): Waterborne Vessels

Stability & Control Aspects of UCAV Configurations

M2.50-cal. Multishot Capabilities at the US Army Research Laboratory

STUDIES OF FINITE AMPLITUDE SHEAR WAVE INSTABILITIES. James T. Kirby. Center for Applied Coastal Research. University of Delaware.

Analysis of Packery Channel Public Access Boat Ramp Shoreline Failure

Waves, Bubbles, Noise and Underwater Communications

Aircraft Fuel Cell Repair Equipment

Surface Wave Processes on the Continental Shelf and Beach

AFT'LICATION OF M3vABLE-RED F'HYSICAL MODHIS To FBED1crslWM-INDUCED ERmIoN

Behavioral Response of Dolphins to Signals Simulating Mid-Frequency Sonar

Observations of Near-Bottom Currents with Low-Cost SeaHorse Tilt Current Meters

AFRL-RH-WP-TR

OE Barricade Guide Development. Michelle Crull, PhD, PE Wallace Watanabe James Manthey, PE Charles Barker, PE

Inlet Influence on the Pressure and Temperature Distortion Entering the Compressor of an Air Vehicle

Acoustic Focusing in Shallow Water and Bubble Radiation Effects

Shoreline Change Modeling Using One-Line Models: Application and Comparison of GenCade, Unibest, and Litpack

Surface Wave Processes on the Continental Shelf and Beach

Implementation of Structures in the CMS: Part IV, Tide Gate

Frostbite in Ski Boots for Marines

Internal Tides and Solitary Waves in the Northern South China Sea: A Nonhydrostatic Numerical Investigation

Coastal & Marine Environment. Chapter. Wave Transformation. Mazen Abualtayef Assistant Prof., IUG, Palestine

Tedious Creek Small Craft Harbor: CGWAVE Model Comparisons Between Existing and Authorized Breakwater Configurations

Nearshore Wave-Topography Interactions

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

The Great Coastal Gale of 2007 from Coastal Storms Program Buoy 46089

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Observations of Velocity Fields Under Moderately Forced Wind Waves

Proceedings, 2001National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, pp COASTAL INLET BANK EROSION. William C.

Hyperspectral Optical Properties, Remote Sensing, and Underwater Visibility

Anthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment

Understanding the Dynamics of Shallow-Water Oceanographic Moorings

ENGINEERING STUDY OF INLET ENTRANCE HYDRODYNAMICS: GRAYS HARBOR, WASHINGTON, USA

RIP CURRENTS. Award # N

Next Generation Modeling for Deep Water Wave Breaking and Langmuir Circulation

The Continued Development of the Third-Generation Shallow Water Wave Model "Swan"

Wave Propagation and Shoaling

Rip Currents Onshore Submarine Canyons: NCEX Analysis

Imagine that you can see a side view of a wave as it approaches a beach. Describe how the wave changes as the wave approaches the beach.

Plankton Distribution in Internal Waves in Massachusetts Bay

Seafloor Ripple Measurements at the Martha s Vineyard Coastal Observatory

Numerical modeling of refraction and diffraction

First Year Morphological Evolution of an Artificial Berm at Fort Myers Beach, Florida

Hydro-Thermal Vent Mapping with Multiple AUV's AZORES-2001

Data Analysis: Plankton Distribution in Internal Waves in Massachusetts Bay

The Influence of Breaking at the Ocean Surface on Oceanic Radiance and Imaging

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON WAVE OVERTOPPING OVER SMOOTH AND STEPPED GENTLE SLOPE SEAWALLS

Calculation of the Internal Blast Pressures for Tunnel Magazine Tests

Coastal Engineering Technical Note

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS FOR WAVE RUN-UP ON THE TETRAPOD ARMOURED RUBBLE MOUND STRUCTURE WITH A STEEP FRONT SLOPE

Distributed Integrated Ocean Prediction System (DIOPS) / SWAN Rapid Transition Program

Harbor Threat Detection, Classification, and Identification

Optical Imaging of the Nearshore

WAVE MECHANICS FOR OCEAN ENGINEERING

Technical Note AN EMPIRICAL. METHOD FOR DESIGN OF BREAKWATERS AS SHORE PROTECTION STRUCTURES

Concrete Obstacle Vulnerability

Adib R. Farsoun. U.S. Army Engineer Division, Huntsville 106 Wynn Dr. Huntsville, AL ABSTRACT

Testing TELEMAC-2D suitability for tsunami propagation from source to near shore

(Supplementary) Investigation Waves in a Ripple Tank

WAVE PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION ON PERMEABLE VERTICAL WALLS

National Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Program Overview

Broadband acoustic transmission measurements in surface ship wakes

PHYSICAL MOMTORING OF NEARSHORE SANDBERMS

C/JU,TING TIDAL EL FVATION PROBABILITIES

LOADED MULTICELLULAR MAGAZINE. Laurent ALLA IN

FEDERAL INLETS DATABASE

Wave Transmission at Detached Breakwaters for Shoreline Response Modeling

Appendix E Cat Island Borrow Area Analysis

OCEAN WAVES NAME. I. Introduction

Secretary of the Navy Professor of Oceanography

Transcription:

CEPi-I-18 REvKn, 3188 IRREGULAR WAVE DIFFRACTION BY GODA'S KETHOD PURPOSE : To provide a simplified method for determining random wave diffraction coefficients for a semi-infinite breakwater. GENERAL : Studies of wave diffraction have typically assumed that waves are monochromatic. Actual sea waves occur in a directional spectrum lengths or periods. Wave diffraction methods which are based on waves, and which ignore the wave spectrum, may give an incorrect (overestimation) of wave heights near a coastal structure. of many wave- monochromatic prediction Goda, et al. (1978) and Goda (1985) discuss a means of determining wave diffraction coefficients at a large island or semi-infinite length-breakwater for directional wave spectra. This method is based on a dimensionless frequency parameter, S,,,. Recommended values of this parameter for different types of waves in deep water, (S,,,),, arei TYPE OF WAVE ( max)o Wind Waves 10 Short Swell (large wave steepness) 25 Long Swell (small wave steepness) 75 Kraus (1984) has developed simple approximations based on the work of Goda which result in a relatively easy procedure for calculating the diffraction coefficients. These approximations provide wave heights along a coast, e.g., for longshore transport calculations, with little loss of accuracy. However, in some areas of the shadow zone between the breakwater and the shoreline, particularly close to the breakwater, the approximations may underestimate the diffraction coefficient, i.e., not provide a conservative estimate., U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Stat&m, Coastal Engineering Research Center r. 0. 60x 631, vicksburg# Mhdssippi 39180

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE MAR 1988 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-1988 to 00-00-1988 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Irregular Wave Diffraction By Goda s Method 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiemnt Station,Coastal Engineering Research center,vicksburg,ms,39180 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 4 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

METHOD : Goda defines the parameter, Smax, in shallow water in terms of the deepwater parameters, (S,,x)o, by using Figure 1, in which d is the water depth at the breakwater tip, Lo is the deepwater wavelength of the significant wave, and a o is the angle of the wave crest with respect to the bottom contours where the wave enters shallow water (a 5 00 0 parallel to the bottom contours). if the wave crest is s ma d/l, Figure 1. Change of maximum directional concentration parameter, S max, due to wave refraction in shallow water (Coda, 1985) After the value of S,,, is determined, the value of K(B), the diffraction coefficient along a line at an angle 0 from the wave direction at the breakwater tip (see Figure 21, is determined as a decimal fraction of the wave height at the tip. Kraus (1984) gives this as an approximation by the equation where 8 is in radians, and W is given by w= -0.000103 s;,, + 0.270 Sm,, + 5.31. 2

ElJ'kI-18 REVISED 3188 Incident wave direction at the breakwater tip Figure 2. Definition sketch for using the random wave diffraction method of Goda (1985) The diffraction coefficients obtained by Kraus compare favorably with those computed more exactly by Coda, et al. (19781, except where KO (0.2. Where K(O) CO.2, the approximations of Kraus will underestimate the value of Ke. However, this error is not expected to have significant impact since-it is in a small waveheight region. Examples of the more exact value of K(B) obtained by Goda are shown in Figure 3. Is,,,=lol a NAVE DIRECTION t 10 8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 (s.i.-7s10 z WAVE DIRECTION z (al S,, = 10 - HEIGHT RATIO,KC8) b) Smax = 75 Fig.3 Dlffraction Diagrams of a Seml~Infinlte Breakwater for Directional Random Waves of tiormal Incidence (G&a, et al., 1978)

GIVEN: Wind waves are determined to have a significant period, T, of 12 seconds and a deepwater wavelength, Lo of 738 feet. The wave angle, uo, with respect to the bottom contours where the wave enters shallow water is 30'. A breakwater tip is in a water depth of 30 feet. The wave direction at the breakwater tip is at the angle of 90' shown. FIND: The diffraction coefficient K along the line at an angle of -30' shown. SOLUTION: At the breakwater tip Incident wave direction d 30 L, = - 738 = 0.0407 (S,,,), = 10 (for wind waves) From Figure 1, for (Sma,)o = 10, d - = 0.0407 and o. = 30", S,,x = 75 LO W =-0.000130 Siax + 0.270 Smax + 5.31 w =-0.000130 (75)2 + 0.270 (75) + 5.31 = 24:83 6 = -30 = -0.5236 radians -_ K(8) = I-!$$).+ 3 ' = J 0.5 kanh.( 75 (-~~~~~61) + g K(8) = 0.201 This is comparable to the value obtained from Figure 3b. ****************************XX** REFERENCES: Goda, Y. 1985. Random Seas and Design of Maritime Structures, University of Tokyo Press. Tokyo, Japan. Coda, Y., Takayama, T., and Suzuki, Y. 1978. "Diffraction Diagrams for Directional Random Waves," Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Coastal Engineering, AXE, Chapter 35, pp. 628-650. Kraus, N. C. 1984. "Estimate of Breaking Wave Height Behind Structures," Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, AXE, Vol. 110, No. 2, pp. 276-282. 4