Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp (Lepidurus packardi)

Similar documents
Longhorn Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta longiantenna)

Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi)

Biology & Ecology of large branchiopods

SEASONAL OCCURRENCE AND HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME VERNAL POOL BRANCHIOPODA IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, U.S.A. Sean P. Gallagher

A.23 RIVER LAMPREY (LAMPETRA

Restored Vernal Pools in California and post-creation Monitoring and Management Introduction Vernal Pool Context Biota of Vernal Pools

Catlow Valley Redband Trout

California Tiger Salamander (Ambystoma californiense)

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

Frequently Asked Questions About Revised Critical Habitat and Economic Analysis for the Endangered Arroyo Toad

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

Klamath Lake Bull Trout

State of San Francisco Bay 2011 Appendix O Steelhead Trout Production as an Indicator of Watershed Health

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

Preserving Biodiversity

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Causes of Tiger (Panthera tigris) Population Decline, and Potential Consequences if the Decline Continues

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Crossing Corridors. Objective. Materials. Background Information

Factors Affecting the Reproduction of Bluegill Bream and Largemouth Black Bass in Ponds

Searsville Dam Removal

Critical Habitat: No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District

Species at Risk Act (SARA) Consultation Workbook

A.21 SACRAMENTO SPLITTAIL (POGONICHTHYS

BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 10

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Protect Our Reefs Grant Interim Report (October 1, 2008 March 31, 2009) Principal investigators: Donald C. Behringer and Mark J.

Improving post-stocking survival of hatchery reared threatened fish species

Description of the Fields

ESA, Proposed Threatened ESA, Threatened New Mexico-WCA, Endangered

Goldfish Removal Millar s Pond. Resort Municipality of Whistler

Policy Position Statement on Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and hybrids in Ireland and Northern Ireland

The great obstacle is simply this: the conviction that we cannot change because we are dependent on what is wrong. But that is the addict s excuse,

Scientific Name: Ameiurus melas Common Name: Black bullhead BISON No.:

Native Suckers of the Chuska Mountains and Defiance Plateau GLENN SELBY-FISH BIOLOGIST

CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND SUSTAINING S LIVELIHOODS ALONG THE MEKONG RIVER IN LUANG PHRABANG, XAYABOURI AND

Winter Drawdown Issues of Concern

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

Managing Chesapeake Bay s Land Use, Fish Habitat, and Fisheries: Studies. Jim Uphoff & Margaret McGinty, Fisheries Service

Willamette River Oregon Chub

INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR THE DOS PALMAS AREA

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Wildlife Introduction

ESRM 350 Habitat Loss and Fragmentation

Living Beaches: Integrating The Ecological Function Of Beaches Into Coastal Engineering Projects and Beach Management

Field Guide: Teacher Notes

Endangered Species Conservation in Indiana. Scott Johnson Wildlife Science Program Manager Division of Fish and Wildlife, IDNR

Managing floodplain productivity: Slow it down, Spread it out, Grow em Up

We Should Protect Vulnerable Vernal Pools

Managing Development and Chesapeake Bay s Estuarine Fish

The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank

Golden Eggs: Kern River Hatchery and the Conservation of California s State Fish

11426 Moorage Way P.O. Box 368 LaConner, WA Phone: Fax:

FACT SHEET I. LOCATION

ESA, Proposed Threatened ESA, Threatened New Mexico-WCA, Endangered

Deschutes Bull Trout

Coho Salmon 1. COMMON NAMES: Silver salmon, Coho, blue back, silversides, and jack salmon.

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Wood Storks & Wetlands. UCF Jan. 26, 2010 Jason Lauritsen Asst. Director Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

First Nations Fish Habitat Program Discussion Workbook

AQUATIC HABITAT AND LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS PREDICT DISTRIBUTION OF AMPHIBIANS IN ELKHORN SLOUGH. January 16 th, 2007

Malheur Lakes Redband Trout

What is a CTS. Amphibian Conservation. CTS Pre-Test. California Tiger Salamander Biology and Conservation. Pete Trenham

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

Oregon Spotted Frogs 101. Deanna Lynch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Discovery Safari Field Guide

Covered Species Accounts Green Sturgeon

Warner Lakes Redband Trout

Green Sturgeon Feeding Observations in Humboldt Bay, California

The UK Experience with use of Triploids for Restocking

WHALE SHARK (Rhincodon typus) RECOVERY PLAN

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Community Conservation Plan

Blending Research, Management, Outreach, and Policy to Recover a Federally Listed Species. Megan M. Seymour

Aggregate Permit Applications: Natural Environment Report A.R Yes. Lands & Waters Aggregate & Petroleum Resources March 15, 2006

CARL BLACKWELL LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Western native Trout Status report

FACT SHEET MCGREGOR LAKE RESTORATION HABITAT PROJECT POOL 10, UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Wildlife Issues With Oil and Gas Exploration. Peter D. McKone, CWB Senior Project Director

Our foundation introduce Nature and conservation in Lake Izunuma Uchinuma.

Brook Trout in Massachusetts: A Troubled History, A Hopeful Future

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Watershed Management Plan, Final Version Part I: Existing Conditions Report

SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

Don Pedro Project Relicensing

CHINOOK SALMON SACRAMENTO RIVER WINTER-RUN ESU, CENTRAL VALLEY SPRING-RUN ESU, AND CENTRAL VALLEY FALL AND LATE FALL-RUN ESU

San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotus mutica)

Sustaining Wild Species

Fish Texas AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

Aquatic Biological Assessment. Lassen 15 Restoration Project. Modoc National Forest Warner Mountain Ranger District

Invasive Species. Grade Levels. Introduction. This activity is intended for grades 9 12.

Endangered Cactus Role-Playing Debate May, The Proposed Action

Transcription:

Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp (Lepidurus packardi) Status State: Meets the requirements as a rare, threatened or endangered species under CEQA Federal: Endangered Critical Habitat: Designated, but none occurs in inventory area (USFWS 2006) Population Trend Global: Declining due to habitat loss and fragmentation (Eriksen and Belk 1999). State: Same as above Within Inventory Area: Unknown Data Characterization The location database for the vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi) within the inventory area does not include any records from within the ECCC HCP/NCP inventory area. However, this species commonly co-occurs with the vernal pool fairy shrimp, which is known to occur within the inventory area, and is also recorded from areas adjacent to the inventory area. Other natural and artificial habitats throughout the grassland habitats within the inventory area have a high probability of being occupied by additional populations of the vernal pool tadpole shrimp. Systematic, distribution, and ecological data are presented in Rogers (2001). Range The vernal pool tadpole shrimp is a California Great Central Valley endemic species, with the majority of the populations occurring in the Sacramento Valley. This species has also been reported from the Sacramento River Delta to the east side of San Francisco Bay, and from a few scattered localities in the San Joaquin Valley from San Joaquin County to Madera County (Rogers 2001). Occurrences within the ECCC HCP/NCCP Inventory Area The vernal pool tadpole shrimp is not known to be present within the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area. However, due to the presence of suitable habitat and populations within close proximity to the inventory area, unrecorded populations may be present in vernal pool and swale habitat of the non-native annual grassland and in other depressions that seasonally collect rainwater. Since a comprehensive survey for the vernal pool tadpole shrimp has not been conducted East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 1

in the inventory area, the current population distribution within the inventory area is unknown. As of January 2001, the California Natural Diversity Database listed 5 occurrences of vernal pool tadpole shrimp adjacent to the inventory area. The lack of data points within the open-space areas is probably due to a lack of survey effort. Biology Habitat Vernal pool tadpole shrimp occur in a wide variety of seasonal habitats, including vernal pools, clay flats, alkaline pools, ephemeral stock tanks, roadside ditches, and road ruts (Rogers 2001, California Natural Diversity Database 2001). Habitats where vernal pool tadpole shrimps have been observed range in size from small, clear, well-vegetated vernal pools to highly turbid, alkali scald pools to large winter lakes (Rogers 2001). Tadpole shrimp cysts (resting eggs) must dry out before they will hatch. Typically the vernal pool tadpole shrimp is found in habitats that are deeper than 12 centimeters, pond for 15 to 30 days, and do not suffer wide daily temperature fluctuations. The vernal pool tadpole shrimp has not been reported as utilizing strongly saline habitats. This species is found in seasonal wetlands and other winter/springtime temporarily ponded areas of sufficient size (depth and area) and seasonality that pond for a sufficient duration to maintain conducive water temperatures to allow the vernal pool tadpole shrimp to complete their life cycles (Rogers 2001). Feeding Tadpole shrimp are omnivores. Typically, they forage while digging through sediments at the bottom of their habitats, feeding on plants as well as metazoans. Tadpole shrimp are cannibalistic and have been observed consuming newly molted fellow tadpole shrimp (Rogers pers. comm.). In addition, vernal pool tadpole shrimp will consume fairy shrimp, including both vernal pool fairy shrimp and midvalley fairy shrimp. Though they do not actively seek out these species, they will consume them if the fairy shrimp are present at the bottom of the pool where the tadpole shrimp is foraging. Ecology Vernal pool tadpole shrimp are either hermaphroditic or parthenogenic (Rogers 2001). All animals produce cysts (resting eggs), which are typically shed as the animal moves about (Rogers in press). These cysts diapause (enter into a quiescent, dormant stage), remaining in the soil through the drying phase of the habitat, and then hatching as the subsequent rainy season inundates the habitat. East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 2

Cysts may hatch at various times, anywhere from 1 hour to 3 weeks after the pools are inundated. The exact hatching stimuli are unknown. The vernal pool tadpole shrimp mature more slowly than fairy shrimp, and are longer lived. Typically, adults will survive until the vernal pool dries or until temperatures of 10 to 15 degrees Celsius are reached (Rogers pers. comm.). Vernal pool tadpole shrimp can begin shedding cysts in as little as 15 days. Vernal pool tadpole shrimp are prey to amphibians and waterfowl. Predator consumption of tadpole shrimp cysts aids in distributing populations of tadpole shrimps. Predators expel the cysts in their excrement, often at a location other than where they were consumed (Rogers in prep.). If conditions are suitable, these transported cysts may hatch at the new location and potentially establish a new population. Cysts can also be transported in mud carried on the feet of animals that may wade through the habitat, such as tule elk, (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) feral pigs, and livestock (Rogers in prep.). Vernal pool tadpole fairy shrimp have been found co-occurring with the fairy shrimp Linderiella occidentalis, Branchinecta lynchi, Branchinecta coloradensis, Branchinecta lindahli, and Branchinecta conservatio (Rogers in prep.). Threats Vernal pool tadpole shrimp are threatened by the same activities as other vernal pool invertebrates. These threats include the conversion of vernal pool habitat to agricultural lands and urban development, and stochastic extinction because of the small and isolated nature of remaining populations (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994). The limited and disjunct distribution of vernal pools, coupled with the even more limited distribution of the vernal pool tadpole shrimp, means that any reduction in vernal pool habitat quantity could adversely affect this species. Habitat fragmentation can isolate and reduce population size, resulting in a process of progressive population extinctions. Small or isolated populations are more susceptible to extinction from random environmental disturbance. Recolonization opportunities are also diminished when physical barriers, such as development or lack of vernal pool habitat, isolate populations from one another or inhibit transport of cysts. Isolated populations are potentially more susceptible to inbreeding depression, which can result in local extinction or reduced fitness (Gilpin and Soule 1986, Goodman 1987a, 1987b). However this has never been demonstrated for branchiopod crustaceans. Activities that alter the suitability of habitat may impact the special-status crustaceans dependent on these habitats. These activities include damaging the impermeable clay and/or hardpan layers of the habitat bottom, filling in the habitat, and altering (e.g. through contaminants) or destroying the watershed that conveys overland flow into the habitat. Additionally, introducing non-native plants, destroying or degrading the surrounding upland habitat, introducing fish (such as Gambusia spp.), into special-status shrimp habitats, and engaging in activities that discourage or prevent waterfowl and waders from feeding at East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 3

occupied habitats and thereby restricting gene-flow between populations may also significantly affect midvalley fairy shrimp populations. Conservation and Management Conservation of the vernal pool tadpole shrimp is directly tied to conservation of suitable vernal pool habitat. However, because comprehensive surveys for the vernal pool tadpole shrimp in the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area have not been conducted, the population size and locations of this species in the inventory area are not known. Also, suitable habitat for the vernal pool tadpole shrimp in the inventory area was identified based on a general classification of land-cover types. Field evaluation of the habitat classification has not been conducted, and the extent to which vernal pools in the inventory area meet the habitat requirements of vernal pool tadpole shrimp is unknown. The importance of artificial habitats that may support vernal pool tadpole shrimp in the inventory area has not been evaluated. Species Distribution Model No species distribution model could be developed for the vernal pool tadpole shrimp because vernal pools and other suitable microhabitats occur at too small a scale to be mapped in the inventory area (e.g., vernal pools are subsumed within seasonal wetlands ). Literature Cited Eriksen, C. and D. Belk. 1999. Fairy shrimps of California s pools, puddles, and playas. Mad River Press, Eureka, California. Gilpin, M. E. and M. E. Soule. 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Pp. 11 34 in M. E. Soule, ed. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer and associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA. Goodman, D. 1987a. The demography of chance extinction. Pp. 11 34 in M. E. Soule, ed. Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain. Goodman, D. 1987b. How do species persist? Lessons for conservation. Conservation Biology 1:59 62. Rogers, D.C. 2001. Revision of the North American Lepidurus (Notostraca: Crustacea) with a description of a new species previously confused with two other species. Journal of Crustacean Biology. East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 4

Rogers, D.C. In preparation. Observations on Western North American Large Branchiopods. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. September 19, 1994. Federal Register Final Rule; determination of endangered status for the conservancy fairy shrimp, longhorn fairy shrimp, and the vernal pool tadpole shrimp; and threatened status for the vernal pool fairy shrimp.. April 19, 1996. Interim survey guidelines to permittees for recovery permits under Section 10(a) (1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act for the listed vernal pool brachiopods.. August 6, 2003. Federal Register Final Rule; designation of critical habitat for four vernal pool crustaceans and eleven vernal pool plants in California and southern Oregon.. February 10, 2006. Federal Register Final Rule; Designation of Critical Habitat for Four Vernal Pool Crustaceans and Eleven Vernal Pool Plants, Final Rule. Federal Register 71(28):7118 7316. East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 5