VALIDATION OF WIND SPEED DISTURBANCES TO CUPS AT THE METEORLOCICAL MAST ON THE OFFSHORE PLATFORM FINO1 USING WIND-LIDAR MEASUREMENTS.

Similar documents
On- and Offshore Assessment of the ZephIR Wind-LiDAR

FINO1 Mast Correction

GL GH Offshore Wind Measurements

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

TESTING AND CALIBRATION OF VARIOUS LiDAR REMOTE SENSING DEVICES FOR A 2 YEAR OFFSHORE WIND MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN

Measurement and simulation of the flow field around a triangular lattice meteorological mast

10 years of meteorological measurements at FINO1

Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

2. Fachtagung Energiemeteorologie 2011, Bremerhaven SITE ASSESSMENT. WIND TURBINE ASSESSMENT. GRID INTEGRATION. DUE DILIGENCE. KNOWLEDGE.

OFFSHORE CREDENTIALS. Accepted for wind resource assessment onshore and offshore by leading Banks Engineers, globally

FIVE YEARS OF OPERATION OF THE FIRST OFFSHORE WIND RESEARCH PLATFORM IN THE GERMAN BIGHT FINO1

DIRECTION DEPENDENCY OF OFFSHORE TURBULENCE INTENSITY IN THE GERMAN BIGHT

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen

FRØYA SEAWATCH WIND LIDAR BUOY PRE-DEPLOYMENT VALIDATION

Measuring offshore winds from onshore one lidar or two?

! " " # $% $ % % & %

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

The NORCOWE legacy - data and instrumentation

Offshore Micrositing - Meeting The Challenge

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

New IEC and Site Conditions in Reality

Wind LiDAR measurement campaign at CESAR Observatory in Cabauw: preliminary results

The OWEZ Meteorological Mast

Testing and Validation of the Triton Sodar

E. Agu, M. Kasperski Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences

NORCOWE met-ocean measurement campaigns

Introduction EU-Norsewind

Coherence of turbulent wind at FINO1

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Report on the Research Project OWID Offshore Wind Design Parameter

Investigating Wind Flow properties in Complex Terrain using 3 Lidars and a Meteorological Mast. Dimitri Foussekis

Analysis and Verification of Wind Data from Ground-based LiDAR

Full Classification acc. to IEC for SoDAR AQ510 Wind Finder. Vincent Camier, Managing Director, Ammonit Measurement GmbH

Equation 1: F spring = kx. Where F is the force of the spring, k is the spring constant and x is the displacement of the spring. Equation 2: F = mg

Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator. OWA floating LiDAR campaign: Babcock trial at Gwynt Y Môr Copenhagen, 11 March 2015 Megan Smith

Validation of long-range scanning lidars deployed around the Høvsøre Test Station

MEMO CC: Summary. ESMWT16419: _MEM_RVO_HKZ floating LiDAR uncertainty_v3.docx 1/8

Evaluation of wind flow with a nacelle-mounted, continuous wave wind lidar

Assessing the quality of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) wind retrieval in coastal zones using multiple Lidars

FUGRO/OCEANOR SEAWATCH WIND LIDAR BUOY ASSESSMENT OF THE FUGRO/OCEANOR SEAWATCH FLOATING LIDAR VERIFICATION AT RWE IJMUIDEN MET MAST

WIND ENERGY REPORT GERMANY 2013

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Evaluation of High Lift System with Oscillatory Blowing in 2.5D Configuration

Sodar Power Performance measurements

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Measuring power performance with a Wind Iris 4- beam in accordance with EUDP procedure

Modeling of Scroll Compressor Using GT-Suite

PROJECT CYCLOPS: THE WAY FORWARD IN POWER CURVE MEASUREMENTS?

The Offshore Boundary Layer Observatory (OBLO) Possibilities for the offshore wind industry

Remote sensing standards: their current status and significance for offshore projects

Comparison of flow models

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

First studies with the high-resolution coupled wave current model CWAM and other aspects of the project Sea State Monitor

How good are remote sensors at measuring extreme winds?

Windcube FCR measurements

Comparison on Wind Load Prediction of Transmission Line between Chinese New Code and Other Standards

A Comparison of the UK Offshore Wind Resource from the Marine Data Exchange. P. Argyle, S. J. Watson CREST, Loughborough University, UK

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Analysis of Traditional Yaw Measurements

Strategic Advice about Floating LiDAR Campaigns. Borssele offshore wind farm

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

Flow analysis with nacellemounted

Wind measurements that reduce electricity prices

COMPARISON OF ZEPHIR MEASUREMENTS AGAINST CUP ANEMOMETRY AND POWER CURVE ASSESSMENT

Lifting satellite winds from 10 m to hub-height

Valerijs Bezrukovs, Vladislavs Bezrukovs Ventspils University College Latvia. WREF2012 Denver, CO May 13-17, 2012

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

Agreement n.: FP7-ENERGY / n Duration January 2012 to June DTU Wind Energy, Risø Campus, Denmark

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

OPERATIONAL TEST OF SONIC WIND SENSORS AT KNMI

Is lung capacity affected by smoking, sport, height or gender. Table of contents

Can Lidars Measure Turbulence? Comparison Between ZephIR 300 and an IEC Compliant Anemometer Mast

An analysis of offshore wind farm SCADA measurements to identify key parameters influencing the magnitude of wake effects

Wind Farm Blockage: Searching for Suitable Validation Data

Load extrapolations based on measurements from an offshore wind turbine at alpha ventus

Competitive Performance of Elite Olympic-Distance Triathletes: Reliability and Smallest Worthwhile Enhancement

Wind Turbine Noise Measurements How are Results influenced by different Methods of deriving Wind Speeds? Sylvia Broneske

Calibration of wind direction sensors at Deutsche WindGuard Wind Tunnel Services GmbH

Rotor Average wind speed for power curve performance. Ioannis Antoniou (LAC), Jochen Cleve (LAC), Apostolos Piperas (LAC)

AutoGait: A Mobile Platform that Accurately Estimates the Distance Walked

Rotor equivalent wind speed for power curve measurement comparative exercise for IEA Wind Annex 32

Atmospheric Impacts on Power Curves of Multi- Megawatt Offshore Wind Turbines

Airborne Coherent Wind Lidar measurements of vertical and horizontal wind speeds for the investigation of gravity waves

Monitoring Conditions Offshore with Satellites

NordFoU: External Influences on Spray Patterns (EPAS) Report 16: Wind exposure on the test road at Bygholm

EMPOWERING OFFSHORE WINDFARMS BY RELIABLE MEASUREMENTS

Wind Load Reduction for Light-Weight Heliostats

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report

Pairwise Comparison Models: A Two-Tiered Approach to Predicting Wins and Losses for NBA Games

Measurement of rotor centre flow direction and turbulence in wind farm environment

Influence of real phase equilibria on the sizing of pressure relief devices

MaxWave Rogue Waves Forecast and Impact on Marine Structures

Tension-Leg-Buoy (TLB) Platforms for Offshore Wind Turbines

Transcription:

VALIDATION OF WIND SPEED DISTURBANCES TO CUPS AT THE METEORLOCICAL MAST ON THE OFFSHORE PLATFORM FINO1 USING WIND-LIDAR MEASUREMENTS Authors: Detlef Kindler K.-W.-Koog GmbH Andy Oldroyd Oldbaum Services Ltd. DOWNVInD EU-Project FINO BMU-Project Title Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 1

Motivation Undisturbed wind measurements offshore North Sea research platforms FINO-1 & -3 Assessment of a wind LiDAR system offshore on FINO-1 Investigation of the distorted wind flow by the met. mast structure on the FINO-1 platform using a wind LiDAR Application to future measurements on FINO-3 Outline Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 2

Wind speed measurements offshore masts wind statistic, speed and direction wind speed profile energy yield analysis High quality data at all heights for all wind directions Attention: wind flow distortion by mast structure itself (in certain wind directions) Motivation Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 3

FINO 3 (2008) FINO 1 (2003) & Alpha Ventus German offshore test site (2008) FINO Research Platforms Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 4

+103 + 103 SKN m + +105 m FINO 1 FINO 3 +20,5m + SKN m +26 m + +22 21,5 m m SKN=NW +4.6 m SKN -28m - SKN m -23-23 mm -58m SKN -50 m Layout FINO 1 vs. FINO 3 Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 5

B 6 WS, WD Top 11 WS 10 WS, WD 6 a 5 T, F WS A 10 a 9 T, P, F, N, dt WS C 4 WS, WD 8 WS, WD 3 WS 7 WS T, P, F, N, S, dt 2 Container Main Deck D Pile 1 WS Measurement Levels Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 6

Top 11 10 10 a WS/WD SONIC 10 Hz A 9 8 WD Vane 1Hz 7 B 6 6 a 5 C 4 3 2 Container D Pfahl Hauptdeck 1 WS Cup 1 Hz Wind Sensors Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 7

Square Mast Base Disturbed Sectors B A 345 A 015 W N S E 285 B 030 075 B A A B 255 240 105 cup on mast top 195 A 165 cup on boom 60m FINO-1 Wind Flow Distortion Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 8

103 m 81 m Comparison top level & 2 boom levels Cups, disturbed LiDAR, undisturbed Level3 Level 2 61 m Level 1 FINO-1 Wind LiDAR Assessment Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 9

Undisturbed top sectors Height: 103 (78) m WS range: LiDAR 2 to 23 m/s Slope: m = 0.97 Regr. coefficient: Cup R 2 = 0.99 WS Regression 103 m (Top) Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 10

Analysis Sector 15-75, 105-165, 195-255, 295-345 30 to 90 and 180 to 240 103 (78) m 1st Period, 4 weeks 81 (56) m 61 (36) m 10-min-avg. values 1965 / / Slope "m" 0.97 / / Regr. Coeff "R 2 " 0.99 / / 2nd Period, 14 weeks 103 (78) m 81 (56) m 61 (36) m 10-min-avg. values 6005 2589 2749 Slope "m" 0.98 0,97 0,98 Regr. Coeff "R 2 " 0.99 0.99 1,00 Regression Results Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 11

Use regression results from undisturbed sectors to correct LiDAR wind speeds Use corrected LiDAR wind speeds as undisturbed equivalent of cup wind speeds for all wind directions, i.e. as well in disturbed sectors Derive correction factors in WD ranges, i.e. as well in disturbed sectors to be applied to the full time series Correction Procedure Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 12

Top WS corrections 103 m Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 13

Boom WS Corrections 81 m Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 14

FINO 3: Triangular Base FINO 1: Square Base Main Wind Direction SW Met Mast Base Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 15

Main Wind Direction SW N W E S Messmast Messmast Main Deck Heli Deck FINO 3 Mast & Boom Orientation Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 16

70 m - Level 7 N Cup W E S Cup Cup Pure Wind Speed Level Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 17

Cup vs. LiDAR comparison campaign on FINO1 LiDAR proved high quality and good availability allowed an analysis of mast disturbance effects Heavy disturbances of wind flow from mast structure need pre-cautions - slim mast structure - triangular mast shape three boom directions - sufficient boom length Consequences for FINO3 triangular shaped, slim met. mast layout final boom layout still to be defined Outlook: LiDAR as stand alone offshore wind monitoring tool on smaller support structures (maybe floating ) on existing offshore structures e.g. like oil & gas platforms research project Summary Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 18

The End Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH EOW 2007 Berlin Slide No. 19 Thanks