Methods and Approach. (b) (a) (c)

Similar documents
Salmon age and size at maturity: Patterns and processes

Seafood Watch Standard for Salmon Fisheries. Public comment period 3: Comment Form

Kamchatka Steelhead Project Science Report for the Utkholok River

Eric Taylor University of British Columbia

Pat DeHaan and Brice Adams. Sam Brenkman and Pat Crain

Kamchatka Steelhead Project Science Report for the Utkholok River. Mara S. Zimmerman, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

Fish Tech Weekly Outline January 14-18

Maintaining biodiversity in mixed-stock salmon fisheries in the Skeena watershed

Managing for Diversity

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

Employer Name: NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center

Salmon bycatch patterns in the Bering Sea pollock fishery

Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Submitted to the

Variation of Chinook salmon fecundity between the main stem of the Naknek River and a. tributary stream, Big Creek in southwestern Alaska

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

6 Jon E. Hess 1, Nathan R. Campbell 1, Margaret F. Docker 2,

Population Structure

Appendix A Recommended EPA Temperature Thresholds for use in Establishing Thermal Potential and Species Life Stage Numeric Criteria

Western native Trout Status report

Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

PETER A.H. WESTLEY CURRICULUM VITAE

Benchmark Statement Respecting the Fish, Fish Habitat and Fisheries of Fish and Little Fish Lake, within the Taseko River Watershed.

OHRC Advisory Committee. Research Report. 17 September 2012

Attachment 2. Exhibit (I) Public Correspondence received as of May 25, 2018.

Chinook salmon (photo by Roger Tabor)

Genetic analysis of radio-tagged westslope cutthroat trout from St. Mary s River and Elk River. April 9, 2002

Applied population biology: pacific Salmon

GENETICS, METAPOPULATIONS, AND ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF FISHERIES

Ecology of Columbia River redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) in high desert streams

Strategies for mitigating ecological effects of hatchery programs

For next Thurs: Jackson et al Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:

Todd R. Seamons Page 1 of 6

NINA Aquatic Research Station, Ims

3. B.S.. cum laude Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, June 2004, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Oregon Hatchery Research Center January 2014 David L. G. Noakes, Professor & Director

State of San Francisco Bay 2011 Appendix O Steelhead Trout Production as an Indicator of Watershed Health

Early Marine Migrations. General geography Four general patterns Influence of genetics

Western CEDAR. Western Washington University. Kim Sager-Fradkin Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe,

A.23 RIVER LAMPREY (LAMPETRA

UNIT 4E. SALMON SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning and Reproductive Success Studies in the Columbia River Basin

Chum Salmon in the Canadian Arctic: The past, the present and the future

Patterns of migration and delay observed in Summer Steelhead from the Upper Columbia and Snake River Basins from PIT tag data

OHRC Advisory Committee. Research Report. 13 December 2010

Proposed 2018 Fisheries Management Measures to Support Recovery of Interior Fraser River Steelhead

The Sustainability of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) in South West England

Catlow Valley Redband Trout

Is interbreeding of wild and artificially propagated animals prevented by divergent life history?

DOWNLOAD OR READ : TROUT STREAMS OF WESTERN NEW YORK PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Genome mapping in salmonid fish

Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Ray Hilborn Tom Quinn Daniel Schindler School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington

Phone: (907) Homepage: Ph.D. Integrative Biology, Minor in Statistics, Oregon State University, 2017

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

Yakima River Basin Coho Reintroduction Feasibility Study

Southern Oregon Coastal Cutthroat Trout

Final Bull Trout Genetics Monitoring Plan for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project. (FERC No. P-308) June 2017

Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

Reproductive Success of Artificially Reconditioned Kelt Steelhead in the Yakima River

Upper Columbia Redband Trout: Conservation for the Future

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion,

Warner Lakes Redband Trout

Executive Summary. Map 1. The Santa Clara River watershed with topography.

The ecology of salmon and trout in lakes

Faculty Focus. Robert J. Naiman, Professor. MD: Were you the only freshwater person at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI)?

Species Status review:

STEPHANIE MARIE CARLSON

Rev. Natalia V. Varnavskaya KamchatNIRO Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky Naberejnaya 18. submitted to the. North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission

Temperature-associated population diversity in salmon confers benefits to mobile consumers

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE TROUT FISHERMEN PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Juvenile chum migration patterns in the lower Columbia River and estuary

SALMON FACTS. Chinook Salmon. Oncorhynchus tshawytscha

Potlatch River Drainage: Salmonid Presence: Largest lower Clearwater River tributary

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery

"Recommended Improvements for the Next Pacific Salmon Treaty"

OHRC Advisory Committee. Research Report. 20 September 2010

Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager

Deschutes Bull Trout

Todd R. Seamons and Kenneth I. Warheit Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Science Division

Alberta Conservation Association 2009/10 Project Summary Report. Project Name: North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment

Wild Steelhead Coalition Richard Burge Conservation VP September 11, 2006

Life history patterns: many solutions to the same problem

Summary of HSRG Findings for Chum Populations in the Lower Columbia River and Gorge

Spring Chinook Salmon in the Chehalis River. Mara S. Zimmerman Chehalis Basin ASRP Science Symposium September 19, 2018

Smolt Monitoring Protocol at COE Dams On the Lower Snake and Lower Columbia rivers

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Homing and Straying, Part II Mechanisms of Homing: Imprinting, Genetics, and Pheromones

Salmon Challenge. Salmon evolution and obstacles to survival

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

CHAPTER 2 - THE COQUILLE FISHERY

Lect 19 - Populations - Chapter 23. Different Levels of Ecological Organization. Populations

Whither the Hybrid Swarm? Stream environments segregate cutthroat and rainbow trout to control hybrid zone locations

JOHN R. MCMILLAN* The Wild Salmon Center, 721 Northwest Ninth Avenue, Suite 290, Portland, Oregon 97209, USA

R & E Grant Application Biennium

Union Pacific Railroad

Informal education programs 0 Not designed as an outcome of the project.

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Transcription:

Issue and Question I propose to identify adaptive genetic markers associated with the expression of alternative life histories (stream-resident and stream-lake migratory) in nonanadromous rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). This will greatly expand our understanding of the genetic control over life history and migration pathways using O. mykiss as the model, and thereby improve conservation of genetically significant units below the species level of classification. Context Rainbow trout (O. mykiss) span a wide distribution of native forms within North America, ranging from northwest Mexico to southwest Alaska, including several recognized subspecies (Behnke 1992; Quinn 2005). The best-known types of O. mykiss are the ocean-rearing (anadromous) steelhead and the freshwater-resident (nonanadromous) rainbow trout (Quinn 2005), which are the focus of nearly all studies of genetic differentiation between life history forms (Docker and Heath 2003; Narum et al. 2004; McPhee et al. 2007; Heath et al. 2008). Yet, freshwater-resident and nonanadromous are umbrella terms that do not recognize the diversity of life histories and patterns of migration in this species that likely contribute to its productivity and population stability (for example, compare Pacific salmon studies of Greene et al. 2010; Schindler et al. 2010). After emergence in their natal stream, rainbow trout display an array of life history patterns that result in differential habitat use and trophic ecology. Juveniles of all types initially reside in streams and some stay within the natal stream for their entire life cycle (Quinn 2005). In river systems with small tributaries, trout may leave their natal stream to rear within the larger main stem river and return only to spawn (Quinn 2005). Certain rainbow trout leave their natal streams to rear in lakes, typically only returning in the spring for spawning (Holecek and Scarnecchia 2013) or to opportunistically forage in rivers. Finally, anadromous steelhead migrate to sea after 1-4 years of residence in river systems (Quinn 2005). This gradient of migration balances fitness trade-offs between potential size at reproduction, fecundity in females, and mortality (Holecek and Scarnecchia 2013). The development of restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping now provides enhanced parentage assignment performance (Hauser et al. 2011) and population structure resolution (Seeb et al. 2011), enabling discovery of fine-scale genetic differentiation between sympatric ecotypes. Such studies of anadromous steelhead and nonanadromous rainbow trout have identified and located genes associated with their migratory patterns and life histories that affect functions including neuronal and muscle development, immune response, circadian rhythm, olfaction, and sexual differentiation (Hale et al. 2013; Baerwald et al. 2015). Employing these advanced methods in the study of different nonanadromous life histories will improve our understanding of the adaptive genetic basis for their behavioral and phenotypic divergence. With an augmented knowledge of and a greater appreciation for the variety of alternative nonanadromous life histories utilized by rainbow trout, we may better conserve and protect the intraspecific diversity that sustains native O. mykiss populations across the watersheds of western North America (Keeley et al. 2007). Thesis Context My thesis research aims to better describe cryptic life history forms of nonanadromous rainbow trout in order to better inform their conservation. I will use a population complex from Iliamna Lake in southwest Alaska as the model system because it has had no artificial propagation or transplanted populations, and currently is only subjected to a nominal subsistence fishery and catch-and-release recreation (Sepez et al. 2005). As a part of the Bristol Bay watershed, which is located at the beginning of the Alaska Peninsula, Iliamna Lake has minimal human development (Sepez et al. 2005) and no introduced species (Bond and Becker 1963).

Iliamna lake and its associated tributaries support large, diverse populations of nonanadromous rainbow trout. The local habitat diversity and corresponding environmental conditions indicate the presence of both stream-resident (fluvial) and stream-lake migratory (adfluvial) individuals, which is consistent with the documented plasticity of O. mykiss life history patterns (Holecek and Scarnecchia 2013). For these rainbow trout, which could easily migrate to the ocean, their lifelong presence in freshwater is attributed to the presence of ample food resources (Kline et al. 1993; Quinn and Myers 2004) that enable maturity at sizes comparable to those of steelhead elsewhere (Kuzishchin et al. 2007; Kendall et al. 2015). The Kvichak River system, of which Iliamna Lake is a part, does not contain steelhead (Behnke 1992), which makes it an ideal area in which to study the diversity of nonanadromous life history forms. Employing a multifaceted approach, I will assess the ecological, growth, and genetic differentiation of nonanadromous rainbow trout in Iliamna Lake and its associated tributaries. Life History Forms Stable isotope analysis of δ 15 N and δ 13 C will facilitate assessment of trophic level (Minagawa and Wada 1984) and habitat use (Rau 1980), respectively, and ontogenetic shifts in both. The resident trout may share prey in the same habitats (suggestive of generalist foraging ecology) or may utilize different food resources in discrete habitats (indicative of ecotypic separation) (Robillard et al. 2011). Analysis of preliminary samples collected in 2015 shows that this is promising, and we will collect additional samples in 2016. Fitting mixture models of Von Bertalanffy growth curves to length-at-age data will allow for the identification of growth trajectories and asymptotic sizes characteristic of different life history forms (Woods et al. 2012). Similar growth trajectories may suggest that they experience the same environmental conditions, while dissimilar trajectories with different asymptotic sizes may indicate experience of discrete conditions (Woods et al. 2013). Additionally, non-overlapping age distributions in the stream and lake may indicate an ontogenetic shift from resident to migratory behavior by all trout, whereas overlapping age distributions in those two habitats would indicate that individual trout adopt stream-resident (fluvial) or stream-lake migratory (adfluvial) life histories (Al-Chokhachy and Budy 2008). Genetic Analyses The genetic analyses proposed are designed to enable the identification and genomic location of candidate markers associated with the expression of alternative life histories (Hale et al. 2013). Fluvial and adfluvial fish may exhibit minimal population differentiation at adaptive loci, suggesting weak selection, or significant differentiation at adaptive loci, indicating strong selection (Hale et al. 2013). Reproductive isolation of life history forms, resulting from spatial or temporal separation, in addition to mate selectivity (Jonsson et al. 1988), may result in differentiation at neutral loci (Limborg et al. 2012). In concert, the three synergistic approaches described above will yield information that augments the ability of conservation and management efforts to recognize and protect the diverse life history forms of nonanadromous rainbow trout throughout their range.

Methods and Approach (a) (b) (c) Figure 1 (a) Sampling site map of eastern Iliamna Lake, AK (Google Earth). Gray F and red A marks show where fluvial and adfluvial rainbow trout, respectively, will be sampled. Representative fluvial (b) and adfluvial (c) individuals. I will collect caudal fin clips from 96 rainbow trout in each of three primary sampling areas; Russian Creek (1 site), Roadhouse Creek (1 site), and Iliamna Lake (5 sites; Fig. 1). Fish in Russian and Roadhouse Creek represent stream-resident (fluvial) populations, whereas those in Iliamna Lake represent stream-lake migratory (adfluvial) populations (Fig. 1). All sampling will be conducted under an ADF&G fish resource permit, following IACUC Animal Care Protocol 3142-01. Following the methods of Baird et al. (2008) and Everett et al. (2012), RAD libraries will be prepared for 192 fluvial and 96 adfluvial O. mykiss with the SbfI restriction enzyme. An Illumina HiSeq2000 (single-end, 100 bp target SE:100) will be used for sequencing with 96 individuals pooled into each sequencing lane. Product The findings of this work will be submitted as a manuscript to Molecular Ecology and be presented at the Alaska Salmon Program Science Symposium in 2017. Timeline Table 1 Quarterly timeline of proposed research Field sampling of fin clips Collect RAD data Genetic analysis Manuscript preparation 2016 2017 Summer Fall Winter Spring Budget I am requesting $6,000 for this project. Please see Table 2 for the itemized costs.

Table 2 Itemized budget of RAD sequencing data collection costs for proposed identification and location of genetic markers associated with alternative life histories of nonanadromous rainbow trout. Data collection costs Item No. items $/Item Total DNA extraction 96 well plate 3 254 762 University of Oregon sequencing Sequencing lane 3 1800 5400 $6,162 Budget Justification The well plates and sequencing lanes are necessary for the proposed data collection and will allow for genetic sampling of up to 288 individual rainbow trout. I request no field personnel or travel funding, which will be covered by the Alaska Salmon Program and Dr. Quinn s research budget, respectively. Dr. Quinn has also agreed to cover the difference between my request ($6000) and the anticipated total cost ($6162). References Al-Chokhachy, R., and Budy, P. 2008. Demographic characteristics, population structure, and vital rates of a fluvial population of bull trout in Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137: 1709-1722. Baerwald, M. R., Meek, M. H., Stephens, M. R., Nagarajan, R. P., Goodbla, A. M., Tomalty, K. M. H., Thorgaard, G. H., May, B., and Nichols, K. M. 2015. Migration-related phenotypic divergence is associated with epigenetic modifications in rainbow trout. Molecular Ecology doi:10.1111/mec.13231. Baird, N. A., Etter, P. D., Atwood, T. S., Currey, M. C., Shiver, A. L., Lewis, Z. A., Selker, E. U., Cresko, W. A., and Johnson E. A. 2008. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3: e3376. Behnke, R. J. 1992. Native trout of western North America. American Fisheries Society Monograph 6. Bethesda, Maryland. Bond, C. E., and Becker, C. D. 1963. Key to the fishes of the Kvichak River system. Fisheries Research Institute Circular No. 189: 1-9. Docker, M. F., and Heath, D. D. 2003. Genetic comparison between sympatric anadromous steelhead and freshwater resident rainbow trout in British Columbia, Canada. Conservation Genetics 4(2): 227-231. Everett, M. V., Miller, M. R., and Seeb, J. E. 2012. Meiotic maps of sockeye salmon derived from massively parallel DNA sequencing. BMC Genomics 13: 521. Greene, C. M., Hall, J. E., Guilbault, K. R., and Quinn, T. P. 2010. Improved viability of populations with diverse life-history portfolios. Biology Letters 6: 382-386. Hauser, L., Baird, M., Hilborn, R., Seeb, L. W., and Seeb, J. E. 2011. An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population. Molecular Ecology Resources 11(Suppl. 1): 150-161. Hale, M. C., Thrower, F. P., Berntson, E. A., Miller, M. R., and Nichols, K. M. 2013. Evaluating adaptive divergence between migratory and nonmigratory ecotypes of a salmonid fish, Oncorhynchus mykiss. G3 3: 1273-85. Heath, D. D., Bettles, C. M., Jamieson, S., Stasiak, I., and Docker, M. F. 2008. Genetic differentiation among sympatric migratory and resident life history forms of rainbow trout in British Columbia. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137(4): 1268-1277.

Holecek, D. E., and Scarnecchia, D. L. 2013. Comparison of two life history strategies after impoundment of a historically anadromous stock of Columbia River redband trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142(5): 1157-1166. Jonsson, B., Skúlason, S., Snorrason, S. S., Sandlund, O. T., Malmquist, H. J., Jónasson, P. M., Gydemo, R., and Lindem, T. 1988. Life history variation of polymorphic Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus) in Thingvallavatn Iceland. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45: 1537-1547. Keeley, E. R., Parkinson, E. A., and Taylor, E. B. 2007. The origins of ecotypic variation of rainbow trout: a test of environmental vs. genetically based differences in morphology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 20(2): 725-736. Kendall, N. W., McMillan, J. R., Sloat, M. R., Buehrens, T. W., Quinn, T. P., Pess, G. R., Kzushchin, K. V., McClure, M. M., and Zabel, R. W. 2015. Anadromy and residency in steelhead and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): a review of the processes and patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 72: 319-342. Kline, T. C., Goering, J. J., Mathisen, O. A., Poe, P. H., Parker, P. L., and Scalan, R. S. 1993. Recycling of elements transported upstream by runs of pacific salmon: δ 15 N and δ 13 C evidence in the Kvichak River watershed, Bristol Bay, southwestern Alaska. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 2350-2365. Kzushchin, K. V., Mal tsev, A. Y., Gruzdeva, M. A., Savvaitova, K. A., Pavlov, D. S., and Stanford, D. A. 2007. On joint spawning of anadromous and resident mykiss Parasalmo mykiss in rivers of western Kamchatka. Journal of Ichthyology 47(5): 348-352. Limborg, M. T., Blankenship, S. M., Young, S. F., Utter, F. M., Seeb, L. W., Hansen, M. H. H., Seeb, J. E. 2012. Signatures of natural selection among lineages and habitats in Oncorhynchus mykiss. Ecology and Evolution 2(1): 1-18. McPhee, M. V., Utter, F., Stanford, J. A., Kuzishchin, K. V., Savvaitova, K. A., Pavlov, D. S., and Allendorf, F. W. 2007. Population structure and partial anadromy in Oncorhynchus mykiss from Kamchatka: relevance for conservation strategies around the Pacific Rim. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 16: 539-547. Minagawa, M. and Wada, E. 1984. Stepwise enrichment of 15 N along food chains: further evidence and the relation between δ 15 N and animal age. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 48(5): 1135-1140. Narum, S. R., Contor, C., Talbot, A., and Powell, M. S. 2004. Genetic divergence of sympatric resident and anadromous forms of Oncorhynchus mykiss in the Walla Walla River, U.S.A. Journal of Fish Biology 65(2): 471-488. Quinn, T. P. 2005. The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Quinn, T. P., and Myers, K. W. 2004. Anadromy and the marine migrations of Pacific salmon and trout: Rounsefell revisited. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 14: 421-442. Rau, G. H. 1980. Carbon-13/Carbon-12 variation in subalpine lake aquatic insects: food source implications. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 742-746. Robillard, M. M., McLaughlin, R. L., and Mackereth, R. W. 2011. Diversity in habitat use and trophic ecology of brook trout in Lake Superior and tributary streams revealed through stable isotopes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140(4): 943-953. Schindler, D. E., Hilborn, R., Chasco, B. Boatright, C. P., Quinn, T. P., Rogers, L. A., and Webster, M. S. Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 465: 609-612. Seeb, J. E., Carvalho, G., Hauser, L., Naish, K., Roberts, S., and Seeb, L.W. 2011. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery and applications of SNP genotyping in nonmodel organisms. Molecular Ecology Resources 11(Suppl. 1): 1-8.

Sepez, J. A., Tilt, B. D., Package, C. L., Lazarus, H. M., and Vaccaro, I. 2005. Community profiles for North Pacific fisheries Alaska. U. S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS- AFSC-160, 552 p. Woods, P. J. Skúlason, S., Snorrason, S. S., Kristjánsson, B. K., Malmquist, H. J., and Quinn, T. P. 2012. Intraspecific diversity of Arctic charr. Salvelinus alpinus, in Iceland I: detection using mixture models. Evolutionary Ecology Research 14: 973-992. Woods, P. J., Young, D., Skúlason, S., Snorrason, S. S., and Quinn, T. P. 2013. Resource polymorphism and diversity of Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus in a series of isolated lakes. Journal of Fish Biology 82(2): 569-587.