DS/EN DK NA:2015

Similar documents
DS/EN DK NA:2015 2nd edition

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

windnavigator Site Analyst Report

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

WindPRO version Jan 2011 Printed/Page :55 / 1. SHADOW - Main Result

Basis of Structural Design

Wind Resource Assessment Østerild National Test Centre for Large Wind Turbines

PARK - Main Result Calculation: PARK calculation (5 x 166m, + LT CORR + MITIGATION) N.O. Jensen (RISØ/EMD)

ANALYSIS OF WIND ENERGY AT CHANDANA, GAZIPUR, DHAKA BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD DATA

Fish Farm Consent Modelling. Poll na Gille

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings

Race car damping 2. Fig-1 quarter car model.

Wind Characteristics and Wind Potential Assessment for Braşov Region, Romania

WINDA-GALES wind damage probability planning tool

Brian P. Casaday and J. C. Vanderhoff Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah

IMPROVED SPECTRAL WAVE MODELLING OF WHITE-CAPPING DISSIPATION IN SWELL SEA SYSTEMS

S L G. Chapter 12: The Behavior of Gases. I. First Concepts a. The 3 states of matter most important to us: solids, liquids, and gases.

Momentum and Impulse. Physics 6A. Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB

Simulating Method of Ship s Turning-basins Designing

Projectile Motion Lab (2019)

Physics 1 HW #8: Chapter 3

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes

WindPRO version Nov 2012 Project:

Interacting Turbulent Plumes in a Naturally Ventilated Enclosure

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Recommendations on Two Acceleration Measurements with Low Strain Integrity Test

Site Description: Tower Site

Unit Activity Answer Sheet

Site Assessment Report. Wind farm: Ascog Farm (GB)

MODELLING THE EFFECTS OF PEDESTRIANS ON INTERSECTION CAPACITY AND DELAY WITH ACTUATED SIGNAL CONTROL

Investigating Wind Flow properties in Complex Terrain using 3 Lidars and a Meteorological Mast. Dimitri Foussekis

NordFoU: External Influences on Spray Patterns (EPAS) Report 16: Wind exposure on the test road at Bygholm

Kinematics of the turning kick measurements obtained in testing well-trained taekwon-do athletes

Name: Answer Key Date: Regents Physics. Waves

Wind resource assessment over a complex terrain covered by forest using CFD simulations of neutral atmospheric boundary layer with OpenFOAM

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

GEA FOR ADVANCED STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

STRUCTURAL DESIGN FIGURE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 288aR

Ripple Tank: Instruction Manual

2018 HR & PAYROLL Deadlines

Wisconsin 511 Traveler Information Annual Usage Summary January 3, Wisconsin 511 Phone Usage ( )

Gorge Wind Characteristics in Mountainous Area in South-West China Based on Field Measurement

501 Interchange Design Interchange Design Considerations... 10

Integration of Lean Approaches to Manage a Manual Assembly System

Numerical simulation on fluctuation in wellhead pressure of geothermal well

CARPET BOWLING m

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

Wave Force on Coastal Dike due to Tsunami

Design of Pedal Driven Unit: An unconventional alternative Energy Source

AN OPTIMIZATION MODEL AND ALGORITHM OF STUDENTS' PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST SEQUENCE

Global Flow Solutions Mark Zagar, Cheng Hu-Hu, Yavor Hristov, Søren Holm Mogensen, Line Gulstad Vestas Wind & Site Competence Centre, Technology R&D

Dewpoint Internal Gas Pressure and Chemical Composition of the Gas Within the Free Volume of DWPF Canistered Waste Forms (U)

SCANTLING AND EQUIPMENT TABLES (STEEL AND ALUMINIUM ALLOY)

External Pressure Coefficients on Saw-tooth and Mono-sloped Roofs

Measured wake losses By Per Nielsen

On Runway Capacity and Wake Vortex Safe Separation Distance (SSD)

ABS lifting unit 2,3 kn

Wave Energy Resources Assessment for the China Sea Based on AVISO Altimeter and ERA Reanalysis Data (ID:10412)

UK Integrated Behaviour Change Programmes

Basics of Flow measurement using Hot-film anemometer

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Estimation of the Effect of Cadence on Gait Stability in Young and Elderly People using Approximate Entropy Technique

Some Design Criteria in Basic Ship Design

Wind Action Effects on Mixed Reinforced Concrete Structures in Non Seismic Zones

WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Physics 11 Unit III Practice Test Projectile Motion. Instructions: Pick the best answer available in Part A and Show all your work for Part B

Sensor Technologie A TEMPOSONICS. R Series CANbasic C207. Operating Manual. Configuration and CAN-Bus Coupling. page PL.

Wind Loading Code for Building Design in Thailand

Utility Debt Securitization Authority 2013 T/TE Billed Revenues Tracking Report

COLLECTOR WIND FARM SHADOW FLICKER ASSESSMENT

Percent

Visualising seasonal-diurnal trends in wind observations

Analyses of 03 OP-FTIR monitoring results

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA

Wake effects at Horns Rev and their influence on energy production. Kraftværksvej 53 Frederiksborgvej 399. Ph.: Ph.

Limits of Wave Runup and Corresponding Beach- Profile Change from Large-Scale Laboratory Data

Quantification of the Effects of Turbulence in Wind on the Flutter Stability of Suspension Bridges

Wind Directional Effect on a Single Storey House Using Educational Wind Tunnel

Control Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cut-out wind speeds

Row / Distance from centerline, m. Fan side Distance behind spreader, m 0.5. Reference point. Center line

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Paxton, MA

2 Asymptotic speed deficit from boundary layer considerations

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

Poland is one of the new countries, which seems to have the potential of being a large market for wind energy projects in the near future.

Saint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers)

Chapter 6. Gait cycle parameters recognition using the. wearable motion detector

Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters

St. Augustine Yacht Club Founded 1873

Snowboard Course: The Optimization of the Halfpipe Shape. Abstract. Team # 10061

Conditions for occurrence of vortex shedding on a large cable stayed bridge. Full scale data from monitoring system

An Indian Journal FULL PAPER ABSTRACT KEYWORDS. Trade Science Inc.

Chapter 5 Directional static stability and control - 2 Lecture 17 Topics

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

Influence of rounding corners on unsteady flow and heat transfer around a square cylinder

Design wind pressures and forces are determined per equations given in section : q Gf Cp - qi GCpi : at height z above ground Resisting System

Short-Term Transit Ridership and Revenue Forecasting

I though clearly subject to heredity, is not inherited in a simple Mendelian

Transcription:

National Annex to Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions Foreword This national annex (NA) is a reision of DS/EN 1991-1-4 DK NA:010-03 and addendu 1 of 010-03-30, and replaces both docuents on 015-07-15. For a transition period until 015-11-01, this National Annex as well as the preious National Annex will be applicable. Technical changes hae been ade in clauses 7..3(4) and 7..10(3), note. Preious ersions of and addenda to this NA as well as an oeriew of all NAs can be found at www.eurocodes.dk This NA lays down the conditions for the ipleentation in Denark of DS/EN 1991-1-4 for construction works in confority with the Danish Building Act or the building legislation. Other parties can put this NA into effect by referring thereto. A National Annex contains national proisions, iz. nationally applicable alues or selected ethods. The Annex ay furtherore gie copleentary, non-contradictory inforation. This NA includes: an oeriew of possible national choices and clauses containing copleentary inforation; national choices; copleentary, non-contradictory inforation.. Foreword Page 1 of 9

Oeriew of possible national choices and copleentary inforation The list below identifies the clauses where national choices are possible and the applicable/not applicable inforatie annexes. Furtherore, clauses giing copleentary inforation are identified. Copleentary inforation is gien at the end of this National Annex. Clause Subject National choice 1) Copleentary inforation 1.5() Design assisted by testing and easureents 4.1(1) National cliatic inforation No choice ade 4.(1)P Fundaental alue of the basic wind elocity National choice Note 4.()P Notes Directional factor, seasonal factor and odified National choice 1,, 3 and 5 basic wind elocity 4.3.1(1) Orography factor and ean wind elocity Notes 1 and 4.3.(1) Roughness factor National choice 4.3.() Deterination of terrain roughness 4.3.3(1) Deterination of orography factor 4.3.4(1) Effect of neighbouring structures 4.3.5(1) Effect of closely spaced buildings 4.4(1) Turbulence intensity Note 4.5(1) Characteristic peak elocity pressure and air density Notes 1 and 5.3(5) Lack of correlation National choice 6.1(1) Structural factor 6.3.1(1) Procedure for deterining the dynaic response National choice Note 3 6.3.(1) Deterination of displaceents and accelerations National choice 7.1.() Asyetry and torsional effects 7.1.3(1) Effects of ice and snow 7..1(1) Force coefficients for loaded areas between 1 ² Note and 10 ² 7..(1) Reference heights 7..() Pressure coefficients - walls 7..3() Pressure coefficients flat roofs 7..3(4) Pressure coefficients flat roofs National choice 7..4(1) Pressure coefficients onopitch roofs 7..4(3) Pressure coefficients onopitch roofs 7..5(1) Pressure coefficients duopitch roofs Page of 9 Oeriew, national choices and copleentary inforation

Clause Subject National choice 1) 7..5(3) Pressure coefficients duopitch roofs 7..6(1) Pressure coefficients hipped roofs 7..6(3) Pressure coefficients hipped roofs 7..7 Pressure coefficients ultispan roofs 7..8(1) Pressure coefficients aulted roofs and does 7..9() Internal pressure opening ratio 7..9(6) Note Internal pressure without a doinant face 7..10(3) Wind pressure on walls or roofs with ore than one skin 7..10(3) Wind pressure on walls or roofs with ore than National choice Note one skin 7.3(6) Canopy roofs onopitch roofs 7.4.1(1) Free-standing walls and parapets 7.4.3() Horizontal eccentricity for signboards 7.6(1) Effects of rounded corners 7.7(1) Force coefficients for priss with sharp edged sections 7.8(1) Force coefficients for priss with regular polygonal section (>4) 7.9.() Force coefficient surface roughness, k, for worn surfaces 7.9.3 Force coefficients for ertical cylinders in a row arrangeent National choice Table 7.14 7.10(1) Force coefficients for spheres 7.11(1) Reduction factors for scaffolding Note 7.13(1) Reduction factors for free-end flow for cylinders or priss 7.13() Slenderness and reduction factors 8.1(1) Notes 1 and Wind actions on bridges Not releant for building struc- 8.1(4) Substitute alue for the fundaental alue of the basic wind elocity 8.1(5) Substitute alue for the fundaental alue of the basic wind elocity tures Not releant for Not releant for Page 3 of 9 Oeriew, national choices and copleentary inforation Copleentary inforation Copleentary inforation

Clause Subject National choice 1) Page 4 of 9 Oeriew, national choices and copleentary inforation Copleentary inforation 8.(1) Dynaic response procedure for bridges 8.3(1) Force coefficients for wind force on parapets etc. on bridges Not releant for Not releant for 8.3.1() Reduction factor for wind actions on bridges Not releant for 8.3.(1) Force coefficient for wind actions on bridges Not releant for 8.3.3(1) Force coefficient for wind actions on bridges Not releant for 8.3.4(1) Force coefficient for wind actions on bridges Not releant for 8.4.(1) Notes 1 and Wind effects on piers Not releant for A.(1) Inhoogeneous terrain National choice E.1.3.3(1) Air density E.1.5.1(1) Notes Choice between procedures 1 and National choice 1 and E.1.5.1(3) Choice between procedures 1 and National choice E.1.5..6(1) Nuber of load cycles National choice E.1.5.3() Air density E.1.5.3(4) Influence of turbulence intensity National choice E.1.5.3(6) Peak factor E.3() Stability paraeter No choice ade 1) : The recoendation in the Eurocode is followed. National choice: A national choice has been ade. Not releant for : See the National Annexes published by the Danish Road Directorate and Banedanark. No choice ade: The Eurocode does not recoend alues or ethods, but allows the option of deterining national alues or ethods.

National choices 4. (1)P NOTE Fundaental alue of the basic wind elocity The fundaental alue of the basic wind elocity, b,0, is taken as 4 /s eerywhere in Denark apart fro a border zone in Jutland with localities less than 5 k fro the North Sea and Ringkøbing Fjord. The fundaental alue of the basic wind elocity in the border zone is taken as 7 /s at the coastline decreasing linearly to 4 /s at the other edge of the border zone. For the deterination of the border zone, local orographic conditions, e.g. the inlets of Western Jutland, shall be taken into account. 4. ()P NOTES 1,, 3 and 5 Directional factor and seasonal factor and odified basic wind elocity The odified basic wind elocity is not changed. The directional factor squared, c dir, is gien in table 1a, where the wind direction denotes the idpoint of the 30 sector fro where the wind coes. The directional factor should be applied together with the terrain ealuation to deterine the characteristic wind elocity fro the wind direction considered, if the direction conditions can be assued to exist as long as the structure. Table 1a DK NA - Directional factor squared c dir Wind direction N 0 NNE 30 ENE 60 E 90 ESE 10 SSE 150 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 0,8 c dir S SSW WSW Wind direction 180 10 40 70 300 330 0,8 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,0 0,9 c dir W WNW The seasonal factor squared is gien in Table 1b DK NA. NNW Table 1b DK NA - Seasonal factor squared c season Month s. c season Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct No Dec 1,0 1,0 0,9 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,7 0,7 0,8 0,9 0,9 1,0 4.3. (1) Terrain roughness The recoended procedure for deterining the roughness factor at height z is gien by Expression (4.4). The following is added at the end of the NOTE after sufficiently, see () Costal areas exposed to onshore wind are assigned to terrain category I for the wind directions in question In Table 4.1, terrain category I is extended to include and costal area exposed to the open sea. National choices Page 5 of 9

5.3 (5) Lack of correlation The effect of the lack of correlation of wind pressures between the windward and leeward sides ay be taken into account when deterining the wind force. 6.3.1(1) Note 3 Procedure for deterining the dynaic response The procedure gien in Annex C is applied. 6.3.(1) Deterination of displaceents and accelerations The procedure gien in Annex C is applied. 7..3(4) Pressure coefficients flat roofs The pressure coefficient for zone I of -0, is changed to -0,5. 7..10 (3), Note, Wind pressure on walls with ore than one skin In the first indent ("-"), the following is added after the last sentence: For zones denoted "A" in Figure 7.5, the pressure coefficient stated for the pereable outer skin ay underestiate the wind force. This wind force is not underestiated if the pressure coefficient is taken as -0,9. 7.9.3 Table 7.14, Force coefficients for ertical cylinders in a row arrangeent Table 7.14 ay underestiate the wind force for a/b <,5 A. (1) Inhoogeneous terrain Procedure 1 is applied. For procedure 1, category 0 is replaced by category I and categories I to III is replaced by "categories II and III". E.1.5.1 (1), Notes 1 and, Choice between procedures 1 and Procedure is applied. En1.5.1 (3), Choice between procedures 1 and Procedure is applied. E.1.5..6 (1),, Nuber of load cycles - fatigue actions For structures where the characteristic axiu displaceent deterined in E.1.5.3 of EN 1991-1- 4:005 is less than approx.10% of the cross-wind diensions, the fatigue actions ay be deterined by eans of E.1.5.3 of EN 1991-1-4:005 using the constants C and K as stated below. c a National choices Page 6 of 9

The dependence of the constant C of the wind elocity ratio ean wind elocity and crit c /, where is the 10 inute crit, i, i is the resonance wind elocity, is deterined approxiately by: C c C c ( Table E.6) crit, i 3/ 1 1 crit, i / exp B C c ( Table E.6) is gien in Table E.6 in EN 1991-1-4, and B can approxiately be taken as B = 0,1. The 10 inute ean wind elocity and the resonance wind elocity height aboe ground with the largest oeent of the structure. crit, i are deterined at the The oeent of the structure is not underestiated if the dependence of the aerodynaic daping constant K a of the wind elocity ratio / crit, i and the turbulence intensity I is deterined by the following siplified and approxiated expression: K a K a, ax h( I ) g crit, i The function h I ) is defined in E.1.5.3 (4) below. The function g assues its axiu alue equal ( to 1 for and is taken to decrease linearly fro 1 to 0 for crit, i. g is taken as 0 for and i. crit, i crit, i crit, The frequency of ean wind elocities up to approx. 15-0 /s can be deterined on the basis of the European wind atlas, see Troen, I.; Petersen, B. & Lundtang, E., 1989, European Wind atlas, Risø, Roskilde. For wind oer a terrain of a roughness length between approx. 0,01 and approx. 0,05, the frequencies of the different turbulence intensities can be ealuated on the basis of a noral distribution using the ean alue gien in 4.4 (1) in EN 1991-1-4 and a deiation decreasing gradually fro approx. 0,06 at ean wind elocities saller than approx. 5 /s to approx. 0,03 for ean wind elocities of approx. 10 /s. The probability ass of the noral distribution for negatie arguents should be taken here to correspond to a turbulence intensity of 0. For fatigue analyses based on the specifications stated aboe, the coefficient of ariation of the fatigue loads should be taken as 30% when the partial factor is deterined, see the National Annex to EN 1990. E.1.5.3 (4) Influence of turbulence intensity The effect of rhythic ortex shedding depends on the turbulence intensity of the wind. For 10 inute wind elocities larger than approx.15 /s, the turbulence intensity of the wind is deterined using National choices Page 7 of 9

4.4 (1) in EN 1991-1-4:005. For 10 inute wind elocities saller than approx. 10 /s, consideration should be gien to rhythic ortex shedding in turbulence free wind which occurs under certain, relatiely rare eteorological conditions. The oeent of the structure is not underestiated if the dependence of the aerodynaic daping constant K a of the turbulence intensity I is deterined by eans of the following siplified and approxiated expression: K a ( I ) K ax h( I a, ) where K a, ax is gien in Table E.6 in EN 1991-1-4:005. The function h is deterined fro h( I ) 1 3I for 0 I 0, 5 og h ( I ) 0, 5 for I > 0,5. The turbulence intensity I is deterined at the height aboe ground with the largest oeent of the structure. National choices Page 8 of 9

Copleentary, non-contradictory inforation 7..9(6) Note, Internal pressure without a doinant face The following is added at the end of the note after "... ore onerous of +0, and -0,3": In this case partitions can be taken as a wind action corresponding to the pressure coefficient of 0,4 due to pressure ariations in the roos separated by the partitions. Literature Troen, I.; Petersen, B. & Lundtang, E., 1989, European Wind Atlas, Risø, Roskilde. Copleentary inforation Page 9 of 9