Promoting Active Communities Award Application

Similar documents
Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN LEON COUNTY FOR CURB RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 1 P age

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

This page intentionally left blank.

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Peterborough Council on Aging

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

Bikeable/Walkable Community Plan. Oct. 11, 2012 City Council Workshop

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Land Use Bicycle Spaces Required Type Residential

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

This page intentionally left blank.

TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Chapter 9: Pedestrians and Bicyclists

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT

COMPLETE STREETS A STEP FORWARD ITE District 10/FSITE Annual Meeting November 3, 2015

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

OSHTEMO TOWNSHIP COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

1

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Land Use Patterns. Traditional Modern

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Living Streets Policy

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION URBAN TRAILS COMMITTEE 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Complete streets serve the 1/3 of Hoosiers who do not drive.

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

4. Mobility and Transportation Element. Page Bikes and Pedestrians

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study Phase 2

Complete Streets Training. Georgia Municipal Association June 27, 2016

Table of Contents Introduction. 2 Purpose of the Plan...2 The Benefits of Walking and Bicycling...3 Vision and Goals of the Plan...

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

Hampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Walking & Bicycling Questionnaire for Candidates

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

Improve the livability of our streets by

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

TRANSPORTATION STUDY REPORT DRAFT - APRIL 2015 A BLUEPRINT FOR HOW WE CAN GET AROUND GREATER SUDBURY, FROM NOW UNTIL 2031

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

ANNUAL TRANSPORTATION REPORT

LOUISIANA COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. Ellen W. Soll, AICP Principal Soll Planning

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Westgate/Belvedere Homes Community Redevelopment Agency. Belvedere Heights. Streetlights & Sidewalks Improvements Project.

Chair and Members of Transportation Standing Committee. Bruce Zvaniga, P.Eng., Director, Transportation and Public Works

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Section 9. Implementation

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation

Vision. Goals and Objectives. Walking

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Transcription:

Promoting Active Communities Award Application Michigan s Promoting Active Communities (PAC) assessment and award application is available for online completion and submission at www.mihealthtools.org/communities. To be considered for the PAC award, the application must be completed and submitted online. However, communities may find this print version of the application useful for previewing the assessment before they register or for collecting data, which can then be transferred to the online application. This print version includes all the PAC assessment questions and is similar but not identical to the online version. When you complete the questions online, the computer provides assistance. For example, the online assessment displays relevant questions based on your previous answers automatically, performs all calculations for you, checks to make sure all questions are answered, and checks for inconsistent or illogical information. Community population and geographic information is also provided with the online version along with links to numerous online resources to assist your community in completing the assessment and obtaining ideas for ways to make your community more conducive to active living. Additionally, scorecards are provided on the online application; each time you enter data and save, the scorecard is updated. Please note the following on this print version: Instructions for skipping/answering questions and calculation instructions are provided in red. (These functions are performed automatically with the online version.) Terms that you can find in the Promoting Active Communities glossary located at the PAC website are in bold face in the print version. In the online version, these appear in bold blue letters throughout the application. All you need to do is click on the word and the definition will appear. Icons in the print version represent links to the Design Guidelines for Active Michigan Communities and Promoting Active Communities Resource Guide. In the online version, these links are active. When you click, the link will take you to the Design Guidelines or Resource Guide where you can learn more about the topic referenced in the question, section or subsection. All Michigan communities are eligible to apply for the Promoting Active Communities award. Communities that achieve an award are recognized at an annual event. Look at the PAC website Frequently Asked Questions for this year s award application deadline (www.mihealthtools.org/communities/default.asp?tab=faqs). For more information, please visit the Promoting Active Communities website at www.mihealthtools.org/communities. Or contact Sarah Panken at slpanken@michiganfitness.org or 517-908-3822. Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 1

SECTION 1: COMMUNITY PLANNING In this section, we ask if your community s planning documents, priorities, and funding reflect commitments to health, recreation, and/or active living. To complete Section 1, you may need to talk with your community planning director, planning and zoning officer, town clerk, township supervisor, regional transportation authority, and/or city manager. Questions with a (CSI), (CSP), or (CSP&I) notation at the end are included in the Complete Streets Score. Note: If you have questions about any aspect of the assessment, please contact Sarah Panken (via email at slpanken@michiganfitness.org or via phone at 517-908-3822). Learn more! Follow the and \ links. Community Commitment to Active Living 1.1 Has your community's governing body (for example, your city or village council, or township board) formed a standing citizens' advisory group, non-motorized transportation advisory group, or health coalition that is working to increase, improve and/or promote opportunities for active living such as walking, biking, or recreation in your community? (CSI) Yes No 1.1a. [Answer if Yes to 1.1] Who is the leader or chairperson of that group? Name: Organization: Title: Email: Phone: 1.2 Has your community's governing body (for example, your city or village council, or township board) assigned a staff person to be specifically responsible for pedestrian and/or bicycle transportation options? (CSI) Yes 1 pt No 0 pt 1.2a. [Answer if yes to 1.2] Who is that person? Name: Organization: Title: Email: Phone: Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 2

Community Planning Documents 1.3 Does your community have a: a. Master Plan and/or Parks and Recreation Plan Yes b. Regional Transportation Plan c. One or more of the following: Nonmotorized Transportation Plan, Bicycle Master Plan* and/or Pedestrian Master Plan** *Bicycle master plan: A document created to establish ways to include biking facilities in a city s transportation plan. Bicycle master plans usually cover ways to plan and design bicycle route networks, create bicycle parking, provide bicycling amenities such as showers and clothing lockers (usually with landowners assistance), maintain the route network, offer bicycle safety programs, promote bicycling in the city, and obtain the funds to implement these items. **Pedestrian master plan: A city- or township-wide plan developed to address the needs of pedestrians. Commonly these plans inventory existing pedestrian facilities and conditions (e.g., identify areas missing sidewalks or places with previous pedestrian-automotive accidents), create a priority list for public investment in infrastructure improvements, and implement the plan through a capital improvements program and the adoption of pedestrian supportive regulations or actions (e.g., creating pedestrian oriented design guidelines). Overall goals of such a plan can include enhancing mobility and physical activity for persons of all age and socioeconomic groups, increasing the use of non-motorized forms of transit, and enhancing environmental quality (i.e., air and water quality). No If yes, to 1.3a, answer 1.3a.1 through 1.3a.5: 1.3a.1 You indicated your community has a Master Plan or a Parks and Recreation Plan or both. Which answer best describes your Master Plan and Parks and Recreation Plan? We have a Master Plan, but not a Parks and Recreation Plan We have a Parks and Recreation Plan, but not a Master Plan We have both types of plans but they are separate documents We have both types of plans combined into one document 1.3a.2 When was your Master Plan last updated? (If your community does not have a Master Plan, answer for your Parks and Recreation plan.) Year: 1.3a.3 Is there a budget, cost estimates or capital improvement plan (CIP) connected to your Master Plan and/or Parks and Recreation Plan? Yes No 1.3a.4 Is there a timetable for implementation of your Master Plan and/or Parks and Recreation Plan? Yes No Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 3

1.3a.5 Are your Master Plan and/or Parks and Recreation Plan being followed? Note: This means some elements of the plan have been implemented or there are budget allocations or contracts in place for implementing certain elements. Yes No 1.3a.6 Do either your Master Plan and/or Parks and Recreation Plan support the following active living concepts: Yes No a. Creating and maintaining a comprehensive network of safe walking routes in your community(csp) b. Creating and maintaining a comprehensive network of safe bike routes in your community(csp) c. Protection of open spaces and natural resources d. Mixed use (mixing of residential and commercial land in the same area) e. Providing shared public places f. Designing attractive downtown areas or village centers g. Creating a network of parks h. Maintaining and increasing the amount of shared-use paths and trails i. Providing recreation facilities for people of all ages and all abilities j. Creating greenways between parks, open spaces and outdoor recreation areas k. Improving access to public transportation(csp) l. Ensuring that parks, shared-use paths/trails and open spaces are within walking distance of most homes, especially affordable housing Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 4

If yes, to 1.3b, answer 1.3b.1 through 1.3b.4: The following questions pertain to your community s Regional Transportation Plan. 1.3b.1 When was your Regional Transportation Plan last updated? Year: 1.3.b2 Is there a timetable for implementation of your Regional Transportation Plan? Yes No 1.3b3 Is your Regional Transportation Plan being followed? NOTE: This means some elements of the plan have been implemented or there are budget allocations or contracts in place for implementing certain elements. Yes No 1.3b.4 Does your Regional Transportation Plan support the following active living concepts: Yes No a. Creating and maintaining a comprehensive network of safe walking routes in your community (CSP) b. Creating and maintaining a comprehensive network of safe bike routes in your community (CSP) c. Protection of open spaces and natural resources d. Mixed use (mixing of residential and commercial land in the same area) e. Providing shared public places f. Creating a network of parks g. Maintaining and increasing the amount of shared-use paths and trails h. Improving access to public transportation(csp) i. Ensuring that parks, shared-use paths/trails and open spaces are within walking distance of most homes, especially affordable housing Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 5

If yes, to 1.3c, answer 1.3c.1 through 1.3c.6: Please answer the following questions in regard to your Non-Motorized Transportation Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, and/or Pedestrian Master Plan. 1.3c.1 When was your Non-Motorized Transportation/Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan last updated? (Use the plan that was updated most recently.) Year: 1.3c.2 Is there a budget, cost estimates or capital improvement plan (CIP) connected to one or more of your Non-Motorized Transportation/Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plans? (CSI) Yes No 1.3c.3 Is there a timetable for implementation of any of your Non-Motorized Transportation/Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plans? Yes No 1.3c.4 Are any of your Non-Motorized Transportation/Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plans being followed? Note: This means some elements of at least one of the plans have been implemented or there are budget allocations or contracts in place for implementing certain elements. Yes No 1.3c.5 Are any of these plans linked and integral to your Regional Transportation and Master Plans? Yes No 1.3c.6 Do any of your Non-Motorized Transportation/Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plans support the following active living concepts: Yes No a. Creating and maintaining a comprehensive network of safe walking routes in your community (CSP) b. Creating and maintaining a comprehensive network of safe bike routes in your community (CSP) c. Providing shared public places d. Designing attractive downtown areas or village centers e. Maintaining and increasing the amount of shared-use paths and trails f. Creating greenways between parks, open spaces and outdoor recreation areas g. Improving access to public transportation(csp) h. Ensuring that parks, shared-use paths/trails and open spaces are within walking distance of most homes, especially affordable housing Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 6

Government Support for Active Living 1.4 Has your community conducted a walkability audit? Yes; Indicate Year: No 1.5 Does your community have a plan or program to complete important sidewalk connections that are currently missing? (CSP) Yes No All sidewalks in the community are already connected 1.6 Does your community have a plan or program to bring all sidewalks into compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements? (CSP) Yes No All sidewalks in the community are ADA compliant 1.7 Has your community conducted a bikeability audit? Yes; Indicate Year: No 1.8 Do your community s planning documents require the accommodation of bicyclists in the roadway, such as the striping of bike lanes or paving of wide curb lanes, whenever major roads (like arterials or collectors) are newly constructed or resurfaced in your community? (CSP) Yes No 1.9 When major roads (like arterials or collectors) are newly constructed or resurfaced in your community, how often are bicycle accommodations provided in the roadway, such as the striping of bike lanes or paving of wide curb lanes?(csi) Always (More than 75% of the time) Often (50-75% of the time) Sometimes (Less than 50% of the time) Never 1.10 In the past 5 years, has your community shown a commitment to creating opportunities for physical activity by passing bonds, passing millages, levying taxes or getting grants to finance the following: Yes a. Shared-use paths or trails b. Recreation facilities c. Parks and/or greenways d. Sports facilities e. Pedestrian enhancements (sidewalks, street crossing enhancements, etc.) (CSI) f. Bicycle enhancements (bike lanes, bike parking, road diets, etc.) (CSI) No Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 7

1.11 Section 10k of Act 51 establishes non-motorized transportation as a transportation purpose under the law, and therefore an eligible use of revenues distributed to cities and villages from the Michigan Transportation Fund (MTF). The section requires recipients of MTF revenues to spend an average (over a 10 year period) of not less than 1 percent of these revenues on nonmotorized transportation services and facilities.(csi) To answer the following questions, speak to your street engineer if you are in a city or village, and your county road commission if you are in a township. 1.11a. What was your community s total funding through the MTF (Michigan Transportation Funds) last year? $ 1.11b. If your community s MTF funding has remained relatively constant, approximately [calculate] = was available to your community through MTF funds for nonmotorized transportation over the past 10 years. Calculation: Dollars in 1.11 times 0.10. 1.12 How much of your community s Michigan Transportation Fund revenues did your community spend last year on non-motorized transportation services and facilities? (CSI) $ 1.12a. Last year, your community spent Calculated % of their Michigan Transportation Fund revenues on non-motorized transportation services and facilities. Calculation: Divide dollars in 1.12 by dollars in 1.11a and convert to % by multiplying by 100. Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 8

Complete Streets Policy & Responsibility 1.13 Has your community expressed a commitment to support and/or adopt a Complete Streets (CS) policy (such as, resolution, ordinance, design guidelines, etc.)? (CSP) Yes No My community has already adopted a Complete Streets Policy If answer to 1.13, is My community has already adopted a Complete Streets Policy, answer 1.13a and 1.13b 1.13a Which of the following best describes the type of CS policy your community adopted? (CSP) Resolution Design guidelines Specific elements integrated into adopted local plans (e.g., master plan) Internal local government policy adopted by departmental leaders Ordinance 1.13b Has your community identified a main person responsible for implementing your community s Complete Streets policy? (CSI) Yes No If Yes to 1.13b, answer 1.13b.1. 1.13b.1 Please provide the name and contact information for the main person responsible for implementing your community s Complete Streets Policy. (CSI) Name: Organization: Title: Email: Phone: Promoting Active Communities Assessment-Section 1 Print Version 9